Search

In the past decade we have seen new advances and thus remarkable progress in the therapeutic options for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Among cytostatic therapies with new approaches in molecularly targeted therapies, we see new developments in a wide range of applications for immunotherapies. In this review we discuss the new potential modalities for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the frontlines, including in early-stage (perioperative) and metastatic settings. The perioperative use of ICIs in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings may show benefits for patients. In early-stage NSCLC (from stage IIB and above) a multimodality approach is recommended as the gold standard for the treatment. After surgical resection platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy has been the standard of care for many years. Based on the benefit of disease-free survival, the approval of adjuvant atezolizumab and adjuvant pembrolizumab was a significant breakthrough. In the metastatic setting, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy, regardless of PD-L1 expression or ICI alone (PD-L1 expression equal to or greater than 50%) also improves overall survival and progression-free survival.

Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is an enzyme that removes lysine methylation marks from nucleosome histone tails and plays an important role in cancer initiation, progression, metastasis, and recurrence. Recent research shows that LSD1 regulates tumor cells and immune cells through multiple upstream and downstream pathways, enabling tumor cells to adapt to the tumor microenvironment (TME). As a potential anti-tumor treatment strategy, immunotherapy has developed rapidly in the past few years. However, most patients have a low response rate to available immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including anti-PD-(L)1 therapy and CAR-T cell therapy, due to a broad array of immunosuppressive mechanisms. Notably, inhibition of LSD1 turns "cold tumors" into "hot tumors" and subsequently enhances tumor cell sensitivity to ICIs. This review focuses on recent advances in LSD1 and tumor immunity and discusses a potential therapeutic strategy for combining LSD1 inhibition with immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive malignancy that accounts for about 14% of all lung cancers. Platinum-based chemotherapy has been the only available treatment for a long time, until the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) recently changed first-line standard of care and shed light on the pivotal role of the immune system. Despite improved survival in a subset of patients, a lot of them still do not benefit from first-line chemo-immunotherapy, and several studies are investigating whether different combination strategies (with both systemic and local treatments, such as radiotherapy) may improve patient outcomes. Moreover, research of biomarkers that may be used to predict patients' outcomes is ongoing. In addition to ICIs, immunotherapy offers other different strategies, including naked monoclonal antibodies targeting tumor associated antigens, conjugated antibody, bispecific antibodies and cellular therapies. In this review, we summarize the main evidence available about the use of immunotherapy in SCLC, the rationale behind combination strategies and the studies that are currently ongoing in this setting, in order to give the reader a clear and complete view of this rapidly expanding topic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive disease with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 10%. Recent data suggest that MPM is an immunologically active tumor, in which checkpoint inhibition through the blockade of the anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (-CTLA-4) or anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) could play a major therapeutic role. Initially, clinical trials evaluated immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the salvage setting after platinum-based chemotherapy with mixed results in terms of efficacy. More recently, the combination of the anti-CTLA-4 agent ipilimumab plus the anti-PD-1 agent nivolumab was tested in the front-line setting, and reported a superior survival as compared to platinum/pemetrexed. While other clinical trials ore ongoing in order to investigate ICIs for MPM, it seems now evident that we have entered a new “era” for the treatment of MPM. In the future, a few issues need to be solved with regard to the use of ICIs for MPM. Among them, there is the identification of biomarkers of sensitivity to immunotherapy that may help enrich the patient population who could benefit the most from treatment, while avoiding for some other patients the potential occurrence of immune-related side effects from therapies that are anticipated to be ineffective.

The gut microbiota influences the clinical responses of cancer patients to immunecheckpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, there is no consensus definition of detrimental dysbiosis. Based on metagenomics (MG) sequencing of 245 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient feces, we constructed species-level co-abundance networks that were clustered into species-interacting groups (SIGs) correlating with overall survival. Thirty-seven and forty-five MG species (MGSs) were associated with resistance (SIG1) and response (SIG2) to ICIs, respectively. When combined with the quantification of Akkermansia species, this procedure allowed a person-based calculation of a topological score (TOPOSCORE) that was validated in an additional 254 NSCLC patients and in 216 genitourinary cancer patients. Finally, this TOPOSCORE was translated into a 21-bacterial probe set-based qPCR scoring that was validated in a prospective cohort of NSCLC patients as well as in colorectal and melanoma patients. This approach could represent a dynamic diagnosis tool for intestinal dysbiosis to guide personalized microbiota-centered interventions. [Display omitted] • Two topological metagenomic bacterial communities are associated with patient survival • A unidimensional dysbiosis score was calculated, allowing survival risk stratification • Gut dysbiosis TOPOSCORE computed from lung cancers could be applied to other cancers • The metagenomics-based score was translated into a rapid 21-bacteria-based qPCR test Topological communities of "favorable or unfavorable" bacteria are functional groups in interaction or competition in the gut. The balance between these anti- or pro-inflammatory communities can be translated into a rapid diagnostic test to evaluate the intestinal dysbiosis associated with survival in patients with lung and kidney cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractBackground The overall response rate of immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains unsatisfactory. Accumulating evidence indicated that glucose metabolic reprogramming could modulate immunotherapy efficacy. However, transcriptomic evidence remains insufficient.Methods Genes' relationship with glucose metabolism and TNBC-specific immune was demonstrated by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). The glucose metabolic capability was estimated by standardised uptake value (SUV), an indicator of glucose uptake in 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), and a reflection of cancer metabolic behaviour. PD-(L)1 expression was used to reflect the efficacy of immunotherapy. Additionally, immune infiltration, survival, and gene coexpression profiles were provided.Results Comprehensive analysis revealing that IL4I1, ITGB7, and FUT7 hold the potential to reinforce immunotherapy by reshaping glucose metabolism in TNBC. These results were verified by functional enrichment analysis, which demonstrated their relationships with immune-related signalling pathways and extracellular microenvironment reprogramming. Their expressions have potent positive correlations with Treg and Macrophage cell infiltration and exhausted T cell markers. Meanwhile, their overexpression also lead to poor prognosis.Conclusion IL4I1, ITGB7, and FUT7 may be the hub genes that link glucose metabolism, and cancer-specific immunity. They may be potential targets for enhancing ICB treatment by reprogramming the tumour microenvironment and remodelling tumour metabolism.

The overall response rate of immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains unsatisfactory. Accumulating evidence indicated that glucose metabolic reprogramming could modulate immunotherapy efficacy. However, transcriptomic evidence remains insufficient. Genes' relationship with glucose metabolism and TNBC-specific immune was demonstrated by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). The glucose metabolic capability was estimated by standardised uptake value (SUV), an indicator of glucose uptake in 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), and a reflection of cancer metabolic behaviour. PD-(L)1 expression was used to reflect the efficacy of immunotherapy. Additionally, immune infiltration, survival, and gene coexpression profiles were provided. Comprehensive analysis revealing that IL4I1, ITGB7, and FUT7 hold the potential to reinforce immunotherapy by reshaping glucose metabolism in TNBC. These results were verified by functional enrichment analysis, which demonstrated their relationships with immune-related signalling pathways and extracellular microenvironment reprogramming. Their expressions have potent positive correlations with Treg and Macrophage cell infiltration and exhausted T cell markers. Meanwhile, their overexpression also lead to poor prognosis. IL4I1, ITGB7, and FUT7 may be the hub genes that link glucose metabolism, and cancer-specific immunity. They may be potential targets for enhancing ICB treatment by reprogramming the tumour microenvironment and remodelling tumour metabolism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the past decade we have seen new advances and thus remarkable progress in the therapeutic options for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Among cytostatic therapies with new approaches in molecularly targeted therapies, we see new developments in a wide range of applications for immunotherapies. In this review we discuss the new potential modalities for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the frontlines, including in early-stage (perioperative) and metastatic settings. The perioperative use of ICIs in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings may show benefits for patients. In early-stage NSCLC (from stage IIB and above) a multimodality approach is recommended as the gold standard for the treatment. After surgical resection platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy has been the standard of care for many years. Based on the benefit of disease-free survival, the approval of adjuvant atezolizumab and adjuvant pembrolizumab was a significant breakthrough. In the metastatic setting, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy, regardless of PD-L1 expression or ICI alone (PD-L1 expression equal to or greater than 50%) also improves overall survival and progression-free survival., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Lieber, Makai, Orosz, Kardos, Isaac, Tornyi and Bittner.)

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive malignancy that accounts for about 14% of all lung cancers. Platinum-based chemotherapy has been the only available treatment for a long time, until the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) recently changed first-line standard of care and shed light on the pivotal role of the immune system. Despite improved survival in a subset of patients, a lot of them still do not benefit from first-line chemo-immunotherapy, and several studies are investigating whether different combination strategies (with both systemic and local treatments, such as radiotherapy) may improve patient outcomes. Moreover, research of biomarkers that may be used to predict patients’ outcomes is ongoing. In addition to ICIs, immunotherapy offers other different strategies, including naked monoclonal antibodies targeting tumor associated antigens, conjugated antibody, bispecific antibodies and cellular therapies. In this review, we summarize the main evidence available about the use of immunotherapy in SCLC, the rationale behind combination strategies and the studies that are currently ongoing in this setting, in order to give the reader a clear and complete view of this rapidly expanding topic.

Introduction: The development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) has been associated with improved efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with urothelial cancer, melanoma, and NSCLC. Whether this association exists in patients with SCLC is currently unknown. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the relationship between irAEs and immunotherapy efficacy in SCLC. To account for the lead-time bias resulting from the time-dependent nature of irAEs, the development of irAEs was considered as a time-varying covariate in univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Of the 183 patients treated with immunotherapy, 73 (39.9%) experienced at least one irAE. A total of 42 patients (22.9%) had grade 1 to 2 irAEs, whereas 31 patients (16.9%) had grade 3 to 4 irAEs. The median time of onset to the first irAE was 24 days (interquartile range: 14–55). The baseline clinicopathologic features were well-balanced between patients with and without irAEs. At a median follow-up of 24 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.0–31.6), the median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the irAE group than the non-irAE group (3.8 versus 1.3 mo, p < 0.0001). The median overall survival was also significantly longer among patients with irAEs than patients without irAEs (13.8 versus 2.9 mo, p < 0.0001). When analyzed as a time-varying covariate, the development of irAEs was associated with a significant improvement in progression-free survival (hazard ratio: 0.44 [95% CI: 0.29–0.66], p < 0.001) and overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.47 [95% CI: 0.32–0.71], p < 0.001) in multivariate models. Conclusions: The development of irAEs is associated with improved clinical outcomes for immunotherapy in patients with advanced SCLC.

Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is an efficient strategy of tumor cells to escape immunological eradiation. However, only little is known about the factors that affect the cellular expression levels. Here we assessed the PD-L1 expression on different breast cancer cell lines under standard in vitro culture conditions and as a function of Epirubicin or Paclitaxel treatment. Moreover, we evaluated the expression in immunodeficient tumor mice as well as in humanized tumor mice (i.e., in the presence of a human immune system). We found highest PD-L1 levels in JIMT-1 and MDA-MB-231 cells. Epirubicin treatment caused a decrease and Paclitaxel treatment an increased PD-L1 expression in MDA-MB-231 cells. In addition, we identified nuclear PD-L1 in MDA-MB-231 cells. All in vivo transplanted breast cancer cell lines downregulated PD-L1 expression compared to their in vitro counterpart. Neither the gene copy number nor the presence of human immune system in humanized tumor mice had an effect on the PD-L1 content. We demonstrate that the degree of PD-L1 expression amongst breast cancer cell lines varies considerably. In addition, cytotoxic treatments and other extrinsic parameters differentially affect the expression. Hence, further investigations including in vivo evaluations are necessary to understand PD-L1 regulation for advanced breast cancer stratification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PD-L1 checkpoint blockade is revolutionizing cancer therapy, and biomarkers capable of predicting which patients are most likely to respond are highly desired. The detection of PD-L1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry can enrich for response to anti-PD-(L)1 blockade in a variety of tumor types, but is not absolute. Limitations of current commercial PD-L1 immunohistochemical (IHC) assays and improvements anticipated in next-generation PD-L1 testing are reviewed. Assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in conjunction with PD-L1 testing could improve specificity by distinguishing adaptive (interferon γ driven and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated) from constitutive (non-immune mediated) expression. The presence of a high tumor mutational burden also enriches for response to therapy, and early data indicate that this may provide additive predictive value beyond PD-L1 IHC alone. As candidate biomarkers continue to emerge, the pathologist's assessment of the tumor microenvironment on hematoxylin-eosin stain combined with PD-L1 IHC remains a rapid and robust way to evaluate the tumor-immune dynamic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is an enzyme that removes lysine methylation marks from nucleosome histone tails and plays an important role in cancer initiation, progression, metastasis, and recurrence. Recent research shows that LSD1 regulates tumor cells and immune cells through multiple upstream and downstream pathways, enabling tumor cells to adapt to the tumor microenvironment (TME). As a potential anti-tumor treatment strategy, immunotherapy has developed rapidly in the past few years. However, most patients have a low response rate to available immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including anti-PD-(L)1 therapy and CAR-T cell therapy, due to a broad array of immunosuppressive mechanisms. Notably, inhibition of LSD1 turns "cold tumors" into "hot tumors" and subsequently enhances tumor cell sensitivity to ICIs. This review focuses on recent advances in LSD1 and tumor immunity and discusses a potential therapeutic strategy for combining LSD1 inhibition with immunotherapy., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Bao, Zhu, Mou, Song and Qin.)

Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is an efficient strategy of tumor cells to escape immunological eradiation. However, only little is known about the factors that affect the cellular expression levels. Here we assessed the PD-L1 expression on different breast cancer cell lines under standard in vitro culture conditions and as a function of Epirubicin or Paclitaxel treatment. Moreover, we evaluated the expression in immunodeficient tumor mice as well as in humanized tumor mice (i.e., in the presence of a human immune system). We found highest PD-L1 levels in JIMT-1 and MDA-MB-231 cells. Epirubicin treatment caused a decrease and Paclitaxel treatment an increased PD-L1 expression in MDA-MB-231 cells. In addition, we identified nuclear PD-L1 in MDA-MB-231 cells. All in vivo transplanted breast cancer cell lines downregulated PD-L1 expression compared to their in vitro counterpart. Neither the gene copy number nor the presence of human immune system in humanized tumor mice had an effect on the PD-L1 content. We demonstrate that the degree of PD-L1 expression amongst breast cancer cell lines varies considerably. In addition, cytotoxic treatments and other extrinsic parameters differentially affect the expression. Hence, further investigations including in vivo evaluations are necessary to understand PD-L1 regulation for advanced breast cancer stratification.

68 Ga-NOTA-WL12 is a peptide-based PET imaging agent. We conducted a first-in-human study of 68 Ga-NOTA-WL12 for PET to study the in vivo biodistribution, metabolism, radiation dosimetry, safety, and potential for quantifying programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression levels in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: In vitro assessment of the PD-L1 expression and cellular uptake of 68 Ga-NOTA-WL12 was performed, followed by in vivo evaluation of 68 Ga-NOTA-WL12 uptake in mouse models with tumors. Nine patients with NSCLC with lesions expressing PD-L1 were enrolled and monitored for adverse events during the study. 68 Ga-NOTA-WL12 and paired 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging were performed. Uptake (SUV, SUL [SUV lean ], and kBq/mL) values of tumors and normal organs were obtained. Radiopharmaceutical biodistribution, radiation dosimetry, and the relationship of tumor uptake to PD-L1 expression were evaluated. Follow-up 18 F-FDG PET/CT was performed in patients who had undergone treatment with a combination of pembrolizumab with chemotherapy. Results: 68 Ga-NOTA-WL12 exhibited PD-L1-specific uptake in vitro and in PD-L1-positive tumors in vivo. 68 Ga-NOTA-WL12 PET imaging proved safe with acceptable radiation dosimetry. Physiologic tracer uptake was mainly visible in the liver, spleen, small intestine, and kidney. Tumors were clearly visible, particularly in the lungs, with a tumor-to-lung ratio of 4.45 ± 1.89 at 1 h. One hour was a suitable time point for image acquisition because no significant differences were noted in tumor-to-background ratios between 1 and 2 h. A strong, positive correlation was found between tumor uptake (SUV peak ) and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry results ( r = 0.9349; P = 0.002). 68 Ga-NOTA-WL12 and 18 F-FDG PET studies suggest that PD-L1 PET before therapy may indicate the therapeutic efficacy of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy combination treatment. Conclusion: Our first-in-human findings demonstrate the safety and feasibility of 68 Ga-NOTA-WL12 for noninvasive, in vivo detection of tumor PD-L1 expression levels, indicating potential benefits for clinical PD-L1 therapy., (© 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive disease with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 10%. Recent data suggest that MPM is an immunologically active tumor, in which checkpoint inhibition through the blockade of the anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (-CTLA-4) or anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) could play a major therapeutic role. Initially, clinical trials evaluated immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the salvage setting after platinum-based chemotherapy with mixed results in terms of efficacy. More recently, the combination of the anti-CTLA-4 agent ipilimumab plus the anti-PD-1 agent nivolumab was tested in the front-line setting, and reported a superior survival as compared to platinum/pemetrexed. While other clinical trials ore ongoing in order to investigate ICIs for MPM, it seems now evident that we have entered a new "era" for the treatment of MPM. In the future, a few issues need to be solved with regard to the use of ICIs for MPM. Among them, there is the identification of biomarkers of sensitivity to immunotherapy that may help enrich the patient population who could benefit the most from treatment, while avoiding for some other patients the potential occurrence of immune-related side effects from therapies that are anticipated to be ineffective.

Introduction: The development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) has been associated with improved efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with urothelial cancer, melanoma, and NSCLC. Whether this association exists in patients with SCLC is currently unknown., Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the relationship between irAEs and immunotherapy efficacy in SCLC. To account for the lead-time bias resulting from the time-dependent nature of irAEs, the development of irAEs was considered as a time-varying covariate in univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models., Results: Of the 183 patients treated with immunotherapy, 73 (39.9%) experienced at least one irAE. A total of 42 patients (22.9%) had grade 1 to 2 irAEs, whereas 31 patients (16.9%) had grade 3 to 4 irAEs. The median time of onset to the first irAE was 24 days (interquartile range: 14-55). The baseline clinicopathologic features were well-balanced between patients with and without irAEs. At a median follow-up of 24 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.0-31.6), the median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the irAE group than the non-irAE group (3.8 versus 1.3 mo, p < 0.0001). The median overall survival was also significantly longer among patients with irAEs than patients without irAEs (13.8 versus 2.9 mo, p < 0.0001). When analyzed as a time-varying covariate, the development of irAEs was associated with a significant improvement in progression-free survival (hazard ratio: 0.44 [95% CI: 0.29-0.66], p < 0.001) and overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.47 [95% CI: 0.32-0.71], p < 0.001) in multivariate models., Conclusions: The development of irAEs is associated with improved clinical outcomes for immunotherapy in patients with advanced SCLC., (© 2020 The Authors.)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) targeting PD-(L)1 are effective in select patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). High PD-L1 expression enriches for response to ICIs; however, the predictive value of PD-L1 expression is limited, which may be due in part to dynamic expression of PD-L1 in the tumor environment. We sought to characterize PD-L1 expression in primary UC and paired metastatic lesions to gain insight into the potential discordance of tumor PD-L1 expression during the metastatic process.Materials and Methods: Immunohistochemical staining for PD-L1 using the SP-142 antibody was performed on primary tumors and matched metastatic specimens in 77 evaluable subjects with advanced UC. Immunohistochemical staining was scored for the percentage of cells positive (<5%, ≥5%) in tumor cell (TC) and immune cell (IC) compartments. Correlation of PD-L1 expression in TCs and ICs was estimated using Spearman's correlation coefficients (rho, ρ). Cohen's kappa statistics (κ) were utilized to assess the agreement in PD-L1 expression between groups.Results: High (≥5%) PD-L1 expression in primary and metastatic biopsies, respectively, was observed in 6.0% and 7.7% of TCs and in 14.5% and 11.5% of ICs. IC PD-L1 expression in primary tumors was not correlated with IC PD-L1 expression in paired metastatic lesions (ρ = 0.05, P = 0.67) and there was poor agreement in high expression rates between primary and metastatic lesions in the IC compartment (κ= 0.086).Conclusion: High PD-L1 IC expression is temporally and spatially discordant between primary and metastatic UC lesions. Future studies of PD-(L)1 targeted therapies in patients with metastatic UC may benefit from use of fresh biopsies of metastatic lesions to define PD-L1 expression when feasible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Triple negative breast cancer patients have a poor course of disease not least because of limited treatment options however immunotherapy by targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint system is a promising strategy to improve the outcome. Here we systematically investigated the expression of PD-1 on tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and PD-L1 on both tumor and infiltrated immune cells. Moreover, the PD-L1 gene status in tumor cells was assessed. 103 tissue microarray samples derived from triple negative breast cancer specimens were immunohistochemically stained against PD-1 and PD-L1. Dual marker fluorescence in-situ hybridization was applied to the PD-L1 gene and centromere region of chromosome 9. The disease free and overall survival rates were determined as a function of the PD-1/PD-L1 status. A slight gain of the PD-L1 gene region was found in 55% of all samples but an elevated PD-L1/cen9 ratio was rather rare (7%). An increased gene dose is not associated with an enhanced protein expression and the PD-L1 expression only weakly correlates with the amount of immune cell infiltration. Instead, we found an association of PD-L1 expression on tumor and immune cells, respectively. Notably, the PD-1 expression on immune cells is associated with a favorable disease free and overall survival. PD-1 expression indicates an enhanced immunological anti-tumor activity and represents a favorable prognostic impact. A deeper understanding of factors that affect the regulation and function of the PD-1/PD-L1 system is required to establish predictive variables and to utilize the system for therapeutic intervention of triple negative breast cancer patients., Competing Interests: CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Aim: The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of solid tumors has been expanding recently. Standard response evaluation criteria are not well suited to evaluate the clinical benefit from these agents. To systematically review the incidence and characteristics of nonconventional patterns of benefit observed in solid tumors treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors., Materials & Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE databases have been searched. Moreover, reference lists of relevant articles were checked for cross-references., Selection Criteria: Clinical studies evaluating PD-(L)1 inhibitors for the management of advanced solid tumors irrespective of the publication status or language. The review author extracted relevant data on the characteristics of participants and the outcomes of the different studies., Results: Nineteen prospective trials with 5404 participants were included. Among patients experiencing RECIST-defined progression and continued treatment beyond progression, rates of response beyond progression ranged from 4 to 10% (of the total number of included patients). These findings were similarly observed regardless of the PD-(L)1 inhibitor used, the disease treated, or the dose used indicating that these findings are part of the inherent characteristics of PD-(L)1 inhibitors for solid tumors. These findings need confirmation from the results of other prospective studies. Many additional ongoing trials were identified evaluating the use of PD-(L)1 inhibitors for the management of solid tumors., Conclusion: Traditional RECIST criteria are not suited for proper assessment of response to PD-(L)1 inhibitors; and more tailored criteria (e.g. immune-related response criteria) should be employed for patients treated with PD-(L)1 inhibitors; moreover in patients with an evidence of disease progression on initial disease evaluation, treatment should not be stopped except after confirmation of progressive disease with a second evaluation at least 4 weeks later.