Search

Let ${\cal G}$ and ${\cal H}$ be minor-closed graph classes. The pair $({\cal H},{\cal G})$ is an Erd\H{o}s-P\'osa pair (EP-pair) if there is a function $f$ where, for every $k$ and every $G\in{\cal G},$ either $G$ has $k$ pairwise vertex-disjoint subgraphs not belonging to ${\cal H},$ or there is a set $S\subseteq V(G)$ where $|S|\leq f(k)$ and $G-S\in{\cal H}.$ The classic result of Erd\H{o}s and P\'osa says that if $\mathcal{F}$ is the class of forests, then $({\cal F},{\cal G})$ is an EP-pair for every ${\cal G}$. The class ${\cal G}$ is an EP-counterexample for ${\cal H}$ if ${\cal G}$ is minimal with the property that $({\cal H},{\cal G})$ is not an EP-pair. We prove that for every ${\cal H}$ the set $\mathfrak{C}_{\cal H}$ of all EP-counterexamples for ${\cal H}$ is finite. In particular, we provide a complete characterization of $\mathfrak{C}_{\cal H}$ for every ${\cal H}$ and give a constructive upper bound on its size. Each class ${\cal G}\in \mathfrak{C}_{\cal H}$ can be described as all minors of a sequence of grid-like graphs $\langle \mathscr{W}_{k} \rangle_{k\in \mathbb{N}}.$ Moreover, each $\mathscr{W}_{k}$ admits a half-integral packing: $k$ copies of some $H\not\in{\cal H}$ where no vertex is used more than twice. This gives a complete delineation of the half-integrality threshold of the Erd\H{o}s-P\'osa property for minors and yields a constructive proof of Thomas' conjecture on the half-integral Erd\H{o}s-P\'osa property for minors (recently confirmed, non-constructively, by Liu). Let $h$ be the maximum size of a graph in ${\cal H}.$ For every class ${\cal H},$ we construct an algorithm that, given a graph $G$ and a $k,$ either outputs a half-integral packing of $k$ copies of some $H \not\in {\cal H}$ or outputs a set of at most ${2^{k^{\cal O}_h(1)}}$ vertices whose deletion creates a graph in ${\cal H}$ in time $2^{2^{k^{{\cal O}_h(1)}}}\cdot |G|^4\log |G|.$, Comment: Accepted to FOCS 2024

In 1986 Robertson and Seymour proved a generalization of the seminal result of Erd\H{o}s and P\'osa on the duality of packing and covering cycles: A graph has the Erd\H{o}s-P\'osa property for minors if and only if it is planar. In particular, for every non-planar graph $H$ they gave examples showing that the Erd\H{o}s-P\'osa property does not hold for $H.$ Recently, Liu confirmed a conjecture of Thomas and showed that every graph has the half-integral Erd\H{o}s-P\'osa property for minors. Liu's proof is non-constructive and to this date, with the exception of a small number of examples, no constructive proof is known. In this paper, we initiate the delineation of the half-integrality of the Erd\H{o}s-P\'osa property for minors. We conjecture that for every graph $H,$ there exists a unique (up to a suitable equivalence relation) graph parameter ${\textsf{EP}}_H$ such that $H$ has the Erd\H{o}s-P\'osa property in a minor-closed graph class $\mathcal{G}$ if and only if $\sup\{\textsf{EP}_H(G) \mid G\in\mathcal{G}\}$ is finite. We prove this conjecture for the class $\mathcal{H}$ of Kuratowski-connected shallow-vortex minors by showing that, for every non-planar $H\in\mathcal{H},$ the parameter ${\sf EP}_H(G)$ is precisely the maximum order of a Robertson-Seymour counterexample to the Erd\H{o}s-P\'osa property of $H$ which can be found as a minor in $G.$ Our results are constructive and imply, for the first time, parameterized algorithms that find either a packing, or a cover, or one of the Robertson-Seymour counterexamples, certifying the existence of a half-integral packing for the graphs in $\mathcal{H}.$

We introduce a graph-parametric framework for obtaining obstruction characterizations of graph parameters with respect to partial ordering relations. For this, we define the notions of class obstruction, parametric obstruction, and universal obstruction as combinatorial objects that determine the asymptotic behavior of graph parameters. Our framework permits a unified framework for classifying graph parameters. Under this framework, we survey existing graph- theoretic results on most known graph parameters. Also we provide some unifying results on their classification.

We introduce the notion of a universal obstruction of a graph parameter with respect to some quasi-ordering relation on graphs. Universal obstructions may serve as a canonical obstruction characterization of the approximate behaviour of graph parameters. We provide an order-theoretic characterization of the finiteness of universal obstructions and, when this is the case, we present some algorithmic implications on the existence of fixed-parameter algorithms.

Many standard graph classes are known to be characterized by means of layouts (a permutation of its vertices) excluding some patterns. Important such graph classes are among others: proper interval graphs, interval graphs, chordal graphs, permutation graphs, (co-)comparability graphs. For example, a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a proper interval graph if and only if $G$ has a layout $L$ such that for every triple of vertices such that $x\prec_L y\prec_L z$, if $xz\in E$, then $xy\in E$ and $yz\in E$. Such a triple $x$, $y$, $z$ is called an indifference triple and layouts excluding indifference triples are known as indifference layouts. In this paper, we investigate the concept of tree-layouts. A tree-layout $T_G=(T,r,\rho_G)$ of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a tree $T$ rooted at some node $r$ and equipped with a one-to-one mapping $\rho_G$ between $V$ and the nodes of $T$ such that for every edge $xy\in E$, either $x$ is an ancestor of $y$ or $y$ is an ancestor of $x$. Clearly, layouts are tree-layouts. Excluding a pattern in a tree-layout is defined similarly as excluding a pattern in a layout, but now using the ancestor relation. Unexplored graph classes can be defined by means of tree-layouts excluding some patterns. As a proof of concept, we show that excluding non-indifference triples in tree-layouts yields a natural notion of proper chordal graphs. We characterize proper chordal graphs and position them in the hierarchy of known subclasses of chordal graphs. We also provide a canonical representation of proper chordal graphs that encodes all the indifference tree-layouts rooted at some vertex. Based on this result, we first design a polynomial time recognition algorithm for proper chordal graphs. We then show that the problem of testing isomorphism between two proper chordal graphs is in P, whereas this problem is known to be GI-complete on chordal graphs., Comment: 33 pages, 13 figures

We consider the mixed search game against an agile and visible fugitive. This is the variant of the classic fugitive search game on graphs where searchers may be placed to (or removed from) the vertices or slide along edges. Moreover, the fugitive resides on the edges of the graph and can move at any time along unguarded paths. The mixed search number against an agile and visible fugitive of a graph $G$, denoted $avms(G)$, is the minimum number of searchers required to capture to fugitive in this graph searching variant. Our main result is that this graph searching variant is monotone in the sense that the number of searchers required for a successful search strategy does not increase if we restrict the search strategies to those that do not permit the fugitive to visit an already clean edge. This means that mixed search strategies against an agile and visible fugitive can be polynomially certified, and therefore that the problem of deciding, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k,$ whether $avms(G)\leq k$ is in NP. Our proof is based on the introduction of the notion of tight bramble, that serves as an obstruction for the corresponding search parameter. Our results imply that for a graph $G$, $avms(G)$ is equal to the Cartesian tree product number of $G$ that is the minimum $k$ for which $G$ is a minor of the Cartesian product of a tree and a clique on $k$ vertices., Comment: 14 pages, 5 figures

We introduce the graph theoretical parameter of edge treewidth. This parameter occurs in a natural way as the tree-like analogue of cutwidth or, alternatively, as an edge-analogue of treewidth. We study the combinatorial properties of edge-treewidth. We first observe that edge-treewidth does not enjoy any closeness properties under the known partial ordering relations on graphs. We introduce a variant of the topological minor relation, namely, the weak topological minor relation and we prove that edge-treewidth is closed under weak topological minors. Based on this new relation we are able to provide universal obstructions for edge-treewidth. The proofs are based on the fact that edge-treewidth of a graph is parametetrically equivalent with the maximum over the treewidth and the maximum degree of the blocks of the graph. We also prove that deciding whether the edge-treewidth of a graph is at most k is an NP-complete problem., Comment: 22 pages, 10 figures

The minimum height of vertex and edge partition trees are well-studied graph parameters known as, for instance, vertex and edge ranking number. While they are NP-hard to determine in general, linear-time algorithms exist for trees. Motivated by a correspondence with Dasgupta's objective for hierarchical clustering we consider the total rather than maximum depth of vertices as an alternative objective for minimization. For vertex partition trees this leads to a new parameter with a natural interpretation as a measure of robustness against vertex removal. As tools for the study of this family of parameters we show that they have similar recursive expressions and prove a binary tree rotation lemma. The new parameter is related to trivially perfect graph completion and therefore intractable like the other three are known to be. We give polynomial-time algorithms for both total-depth variants on caterpillars and on trees with a bounded number of leaf neighbors. For general trees, we obtain a 2-approximation algorithm., Comment: Full version, 19 pages

We consider a cops and robber game where the cops are blocking edges of a graph, while the robber occupies its vertices. At each round of the game, the cops choose some set of edges to block and right after the robber is obliged to move to another vertex traversing at most $s$ unblocked edges ($s$ can be seen as the speed of the robber). Both parts have complete knowledge of the opponent's moves and the cops win when they occupy all edges incident to the robbers position. We introduce the capture cost on $G$ against a robber of speed $s$. This defines a hierarchy of invariants, namely $\delta^{1}_{\rm e},\delta^{2}_{\rm e},\ldots,\delta^{\infty}_{\rm e}$, where $\delta^{\infty}_{\rm e}$ is an edge-analogue of the admissibility graph invariant, namely the {\em edge-admissibility} of a graph. We prove that the problem asking wether $\delta^{s}_{\rm e}(G)\leq k$, is polynomially solvable when $s\in \{1,2,\infty\}$ while, otherwise, it is NP-complete. Our main result is a structural theorem for graphs of bounded edge-admissibility. We prove that every graph of edge-admissibility at most $k$ can be constructed using $(\leq k)$-edge-sums, starting from graphs whose all vertices, except possibly from one, have degree at most $k$. Our structural result is approximately tight in the sense that graphs generated by this construction always have edge-admissibility at most $2k-1$. Our proofs are based on a precise structural characterization of the graphs that do not contain $\theta_{r}$ as an immersion, where $\theta_{r}$ is the graph on two vertices and $r$ parallel edges., Comment: The paper has appeared as "Stratis Limnios, Christophe Paul, Joanny Perret, Dimitrios M. Thilikos: Edge degeneracy: Algorithmic and structural results. Theor. Comput. Sci. 839: 164-175 (2020)". This is a new version where a typo has been corrected. In particular, "$1,2,3$" is now "$1,2$" and "$\Bbb{N}_{\geq 4}$" is now "$\Bbb{N}_{\geq 3}$"

We study the complexity of finding an optimal hierarchical clustering of an unweighted similarity graph under the recently introduced Dasgupta objective function. We introduce a proof technique, called the normalization procedure, that takes any such clustering of a graph $G$ and iteratively improves it until a desired target clustering of G is reached. We use this technique to show both a negative and a positive complexity result. Firstly, we show that in general the problem is NP-complete. Secondly, we consider min-well-behaved graphs, which are graphs $H$ having the property that for any $k$ the graph $H(k)$ being the join of $k$ copies of $H$ has an optimal hierarchical clustering that splits each copy of $H$ in the same optimal way. To optimally cluster such a graph $H(k)$ we thus only need to optimally cluster the smaller graph $H$. Co-bipartite graphs are min-well-behaved, but otherwise they seem to be scarce. We use the normalization procedure to show that also the cycle on 6 vertices is min-well-behaved., Comment: 19 pages, 7 figures. Extended version of conference paper, to appear in proceedings from MFCS 2020

The graph parameter of pathwidth can be seen as a measure of the topological resemblance of a graph to a path. A popular definition of pathwidth is given in terms of node search where we are given a system of tunnels that is contaminated by some infectious substance and we are looking for a search strategy that, at each step, either places a searcher on a vertex or removes a searcher from a vertex and where an edge is cleaned when both endpoints are simultaneously occupied by searchers. It was proved that the minimum number of searchers required for a successful cleaning strategy is equal to the pathwidth of the graph plus one. Two desired characteristics for a cleaning strategy is to be monotone (no recontamination occurs) and connected (clean territories always remain connected). Under these two demands, the number of searchers is equivalent to a variant of pathwidth called {\em connected pathwidth}. We prove that connected pathwidth is fixed parameter tractable, in particular we design a $2^{O(k^2)}\cdot n$ time algorithm that checks whether the connected pathwidth of $G$ is at most $k.$ This resolves an open question by [Dereniowski, Osula, and Rz{\k{a}}{\.{z}}ewski, Finding small-width connected path-decompositions in polynomial time. Theor. Comput. Sci., 794:85-100, 2019]. For our algorithm, we enrich the typical sequence technique that is able to deal with the connectivity demand. Typical sequences have been introduced in [Bodlaender and Kloks. Efficient and constructive algorithms for the pathwidth and treewidth of graphs. J. Algorithms, 21(2):358-402, 1996] for the design of linear parameterized algorithms for treewidth and pathwidth. The proposed extension is based on an encoding of the connectivity property that is quite versatile and may be adapted so to deliver linear parameterized algorithms for the connected variants of other width parameters as well.

It is well known that the treewidth of a graph $G$ corresponds to the node search number where a team of cops is pursuing a robber that is lazy, visible and has the ability to move at infinite speed via unguarded path. In recent papers, connected node search strategies have been considered. A search stratregy is connected if at each step the set of vertices that is or has been occupied by the team of cops, induced a connected subgraph of $G$. It has been shown that the connected search number of a graph $G$ can be expressed as the connected treewidth, denoted $\mathbf{ctw}(G),$ that is defined as the minimum width of a rooted tree-decomposition $({{\cal X},T,r})$ such that the union of the bags corresponding to the nodes of a path of $T$ containing the root $r$ is connected. Clearly we have that $\mathbf{tw}(G)\leqslant \mathbf{ctw}(G)$. It is paper, we initiate the algorithmic study of connected treewidth. We design a $O(n^2\cdot\log n)$-time dynamic programming algorithm to compute the connected treewidth of a biconnected series-parallel graphs. At the price of an extra $n$ factor in the running time, our algorithm genralizes to graphs of treewidth at most $2$., Comment: 20 pages

We prove that the strong immersion order is a well-quasi-ordering on the class of semi-complete digraphs, thereby strengthening a result of Chudnovsky and Seymour that this holds for the class of tournaments.

A simple digraph is semi-complete if for any two of its vertices $u$ and $v$, at least one of the arcs $(u,v)$ and $(v,u)$ is present. We study the complexity of computing two layout parameters of semi-complete digraphs: cutwidth and optimal linear arrangement (OLA). We prove that: (1) Both parameters are $\mathsf{NP}$-hard to compute and the known exact and parameterized algorithms for them have essentially optimal running times, assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis; (2) The cutwidth parameter admits a quadratic Turing kernel, whereas it does not admit any polynomial kernel unless $\mathsf{NP}\subseteq \mathsf{coNP}/\textrm{poly}$. By contrast, OLA admits a linear kernel. These results essentially complete the complexity analysis of computing cutwidth and OLA on semi-complete digraphs. Our techniques can be also used to analyze the sizes of minimal obstructions for having small cutwidth under the induced subdigraph relation.

We study the minimum diameter spanning tree problem under the reload cost model (DIAMETER-TREE for short) introduced by Wirth and Steffan (2001). In this problem, given an undirected edge-colored graph $G$, reload costs on a path arise at a node where the path uses consecutive edges of different colors. The objective is to find a spanning tree of $G$ of minimum diameter with respect to the reload costs. We initiate a systematic study of the parameterized complexity of the DIAMETER-TREE problem by considering the following parameters: the cost of a solution, and the treewidth and the maximum degree $\Delta$ of the input graph. We prove that DIAMETER-TREE is para-NP-hard for any combination of two of these three parameters, and that it is FPT parameterized by the three of them. We also prove that the problem can be solved in polynomial time on cactus graphs. This result is somehow surprising since we prove DIAMETER-TREE to be NP-hard on graphs of treewidth two, which is best possible as the problem can be trivially solved on forests. When the reload costs satisfy the triangle inequality, Wirth and Steffan (2001) proved that the problem can be solved in polynomial time on graphs with $\Delta = 3$, and Galbiati (2008) proved that it is NP-hard if $\Delta = 4$. Our results show, in particular, that without the requirement of the triangle inequality, the problem is NP-hard if $\Delta = 3$, which is also best possible. Finally, in the case where the reload costs are polynomially bounded by the size of the input graph, we prove that DIAMETER-TREE is in XP and W[1]-hard parameterized by the treewidth plus $\Delta$., Comment: 29 pages, 6 figures

During the last years, several algorithmic meta-theorems have appeared (Bodlaender et al. [FOCS 2009], Fomin et al. [SODA 2010], Kim et al. [ICALP 2013]) guaranteeing the existence of linear kernels on sparse graphs for problems satisfying some generic conditions. The drawback of such general results is that it is usually not clear how to derive from them constructive kernels with reasonably low explicit constants. To fill this gap, we recently presented [STACS 2014] a framework to obtain explicit linear kernels for some families of problems whose solutions can be certified by a subset of vertices. In this article we enhance our framework to deal with packing problems, that is, problems whose solutions can be certified by collections of subgraphs of the input graph satisfying certain properties. ${\mathcal F}$-Packing is a typical example: for a family ${\mathcal F}$ of connected graphs that we assume to contain at least one planar graph, the task is to decide whether a graph $G$ contains $k$ vertex-disjoint subgraphs such that each of them contains a graph in ${\mathcal F}$ as a minor. We provide explicit linear kernels on sparse graphs for the following two orthogonal generalizations of ${\mathcal F}$-Packing: for an integer $\ell \geq 1$, one aims at finding either minor-models that are pairwise at distance at least $\ell$ in $G$ ($\ell$-${\mathcal F}$-Packing), or such that each vertex in $G$ belongs to at most $\ell$ minors-models (${\mathcal F}$-Packing with $\ell$-Membership). Finally, we also provide linear kernels for the versions of these problems where one wants to pack subgraphs instead of minors., Comment: 43 pages, 4 figures

In an edge-colored graph, the cost incurred at a vertex on a path when two incident edges with different colors are traversed is called reload or changeover cost. The "Minimum Changeover Cost Arborescence" (MINCCA) problem consists in finding an arborescence with a given root vertex such that the total changeover cost of the internal vertices is minimized. It has been recently proved by G\"oz\"upek et al. [TCS 2016] that the problem is FPT when parameterized by the treewidth and the maximum degree of the input graph. In this article we present the following results for the MINCCA problem: - the problem is W[1]-hard parameterized by the treedepth of the input graph, even on graphs of average degree at most 8. In particular, it is W[1]-hard parameterized by the treewidth of the input graph, which answers the main open problem of G\"oz\"upek et al. [TCS 2016]; - it is W[1]-hard on multigraphs parameterized by the tree-cutwidth of the input multigraph; - it is FPT parameterized by the star tree-cutwidth of the input graph, which is a slightly restricted version of tree-cutwidth. This result strictly generalizes the FPT result given in G\"oz\"upek et al. [TCS 2016]; - it remains NP-hard on planar graphs even when restricted to instances with at most 6 colors and 0/1 symmetric costs, or when restricted to instances with at most 8 colors, maximum degree bounded by 4, and 0/1 symmetric costs., Comment: 25 pages, 11 figures

In phylogenetics, a central problem is to infer the evolutionary relationships between a set of species $X$; these relationships are often depicted via a phylogenetic tree -- a tree having its leaves univocally labeled by elements of $X$ and without degree-2 nodes -- called the "species tree". One common approach for reconstructing a species tree consists in first constructing several phylogenetic trees from primary data (e.g. DNA sequences originating from some species in $X$), and then constructing a single phylogenetic tree maximizing the "concordance" with the input trees. The so-obtained tree is our estimation of the species tree and, when the input trees are defined on overlapping -- but not identical -- sets of labels, is called "supertree". In this paper, we focus on two problems that are central when combining phylogenetic trees into a supertree: the compatibility and the strict compatibility problems for unrooted phylogenetic trees. These problems are strongly related, respectively, to the notions of "containing as a minor" and "containing as a topological minor" in the graph community. Both problems are known to be fixed-parameter tractable in the number of input trees $k$, by using their expressibility in Monadic Second Order Logic and a reduction to graphs of bounded treewidth. Motivated by the fact that the dependency on $k$ of these algorithms is prohibitively large, we give the first explicit dynamic programming algorithms for solving these problems, both running in time $2^{O(k^2)} \cdot n$, where $n$ is the total size of the input., Comment: 18 pages, 1 figure

In this paper we design {\sf FPT}-algorithms for two parameterized problems. The first is \textsc{List Digraph Homomorphism}: given two digraphs $G$ and $H$ and a list of allowed vertices of $H$ for every vertex of $G$, the question is whether there exists a homomorphism from $G$ to $H$ respecting the list constraints. The second problem is a variant of \textsc{Multiway Cut}, namely \textsc{Min-Max Multiway Cut}: given a graph $G$, a non-negative integer $\ell$, and a set $T$ of $r$ terminals, the question is whether we can partition the vertices of $G$ into $r$ parts such that (a) each part contains one terminal and (b) there are at most $\ell$ edges with only one endpoint in this part. We parameterize \textsc{List Digraph Homomorphism} by the number $w$ of edges of $G$ that are mapped to non-loop edges of $H$ and we give a time $2^{O(\ell\cdot\log h+\ell^2\cdot \log \ell)}\cdot n^{4}\cdot \log n$ algorithm, where $h$ is the order of the host graph $H$. We also prove that \textsc{Min-Max Multiway Cut} can be solved in time $2^{O((\ell r)^2\log \ell r)}\cdot n^{4}\cdot \log n$. Our approach introduces a general problem, called {\sc List Allocation}, whose expressive power permits the design of parameterized reductions of both aforementioned problems to it. Then our results are based on an {\sf FPT}-algorithm for the {\sc List Allocation} problem that is designed using a suitable adaptation of the {\em randomized contractions} technique (introduced by [Chitnis, Cygan, Hajiaghayi, Pilipczuk, and Pilipczuk, FOCS 2012])., Comment: An extended abstract of this work will appear in the Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC), Patras, Greece, September 2015

The tree-cut width of a graph is a graph parameter defined by Wollan [J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B, 110:47-66, 2015] with the help of tree-cut decompositions. In certain cases, tree-cut width appears to be more adequate than treewidth as an invariant that, when bounded, can accelerate the resolution of intractable problems. While designing algorithms for problems with bounded tree-cut width, it is important to have a parametrically tractable way to compute the exact value of this parameter or, at least, some constant approximation of it. In this paper we give a parameterized 2-approximation algorithm for the computation of tree-cut width; for an input $n$-vertex graph $G$ and an integer $w$, our algorithm either confirms that the tree-cut width of $G$ is more than $w$ or returns a tree-cut decomposition of $G$ certifying that its tree-cut width is at most $2w$, in time $2^{O(w^2\log w)} \cdot n^2$. Prior to this work, no constructive parameterized algorithms, even approximated ones, existed for computing the tree-cut width of a graph. As a consequence of the Graph Minors series by Robertson and Seymour, only the existence of a decision algorithm was known., Comment: 17 pages, 3 figures

Linear rankwidth is a linearized variant of rankwidth, introduced by Oum and Seymour [Approximating clique-width and branch-width. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 96(4):514--528, 2006]. Motivated from recent development on graph modification problems regarding classes of graphs of bounded treewidth or pathwidth, we study the Linear Rankwidth-1 Vertex Deletion problem (shortly, LRW1-Vertex Deletion). In the LRW1-Vertex Deletion problem, given an $n$-vertex graph $G$ and a positive integer $k$, we want to decide whether there is a set of at most $k$ vertices whose removal turns $G$ into a graph of linear rankwidth at most $1$ and find such a vertex set if one exists. While the meta-theorem of Courcelle, Makowsky, and Rotics implies that LRW1-Vertex Deletion can be solved in time $f(k)\cdot n^3$ for some function $f$, it is not clear whether this problem allows a running time with a modest exponential function. We first establish that LRW1-Vertex Deletion can be solved in time $8^k\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$. The major obstacle to this end is how to handle a long induced cycle as an obstruction. To fix this issue, we define necklace graphs and investigate their structural properties. Later, we reduce the polynomial factor by refining the trivial branching step based on a cliquewidth expression of a graph, and obtain an algorithm that runs in time $2^{\mathcal{O}(k)}\cdot n^4$. We also prove that the running time cannot be improved to $2^{o(k)}\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ under the Exponential Time Hypothesis assumption. Lastly, we show that the LRW1-Vertex Deletion problem admits a polynomial kernel., Comment: 29 pages, 9 figures, An extended abstract appeared in IPEC2015

The Hadwiger number of a graph G is the largest integer h such that G has the complete graph K_h as a minor. We show that the problem of determining the Hadwiger number of a graph is NP-hard on co-bipartite graphs, but can be solved in polynomial time on cographs and on bipartite permutation graphs. We also consider a natural generalization of this problem that asks for the largest integer h such that G has a minor with h vertices and diameter at most $s$. We show that this problem can be solved in polynomial time on AT-free graphs when s>=2, but is NP-hard on chordal graphs for every fixed s>=2.

The Outerplanar Diameter Improvement problem asks, given a graph $G$ and an integer $D$, whether it is possible to add edges to $G$ in a way that the resulting graph is outerplanar and has diameter at most $D$. We provide a dynamic programming algorithm that solves this problem in polynomial time. Outerplanar Diameter Improvement demonstrates several structural analogues to the celebrated and challenging Planar Diameter Improvement problem, where the resulting graph should, instead, be planar. The complexity status of this latter problem is open., Comment: 24 pages

Several algorithmic meta-theorems on kernelization have appeared in the last years, starting with the result of Bodlaender et al. [FOCS 2009] on graphs of bounded genus, then generalized by Fomin et al. [SODA 2010] to graphs excluding a fixed minor, and by Kim et al. [ICALP 2013] to graphs excluding a fixed topological minor. Typically, these results guarantee the existence of linear or polynomial kernels on sparse graph classes for problems satisfying some generic conditions but, mainly due to their generality, it is not clear how to derive from them constructive kernels with explicit constants. In this paper we make a step toward a fully constructive meta-kernelization theory on sparse graphs. Our approach is based on a more explicit protrusion replacement machinery that, instead of expressibility in CMSO logic, uses dynamic programming, which allows us to find an explicit upper bound on the size of the derived kernels. We demonstrate the usefulness of our techniques by providing the first explicit linear kernels for $r$-Dominating Set and $r$-Scattered Set on apex-minor-free graphs, and for Planar-\mathcal{F}-Deletion on graphs excluding a fixed (topological) minor in the case where all the graphs in \mathcal{F} are connected., Comment: 32 pages

A \emph{$t$-treewidth-modulator} of a graph $G$ is a set $X \subseteq V(G)$ such that the treewidth of $G-X$ is at most some constant $t-1$. In this paper, we present a novel algorithm to compute a decomposition scheme for graphs $G$ that come equipped with a $t$-treewidth-modulator. This decomposition, called a \emph{protrusion decomposition}, is the cornerstone in obtaining the following two main results. We first show that any parameterized graph problem (with parameter $k$) that has \emph{finite integer index} and is \emph{treewidth-bounding} admits a linear kernel on $H$-topological-minor-free graphs, where $H$ is some arbitrary but fixed graph. A parameterized graph problem is called treewidth-bounding if all positive instances have a $t$-treewidth-modulator of size $O(k)$, for some constant $t$. This result partially extends previous meta-theorems on the existence of linear kernels on graphs of bounded genus [Bodlaender et al., FOCS 2009] and $H$-minor-free graphs [Fomin et al., SODA 2010]. Our second application concerns the Planar-$\mathcal{F}$-Deletion problem. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a fixed finite family of graphs containing at least one planar graph. Given an $n$-vertex graph $G$ and a non-negative integer $k$, Planar-$\mathcal{F}$-Deletion asks whether $G$ has a set $X\subseteq V(G)$ such that $|X|\leq k$ and $G-X$ is $H$-minor-free for every $H\in \mathcal{F}$. Very recently, an algorithm for Planar-$\mathcal{F}$-Deletion with running time $2^{O(k)} n \log^2 n$ (such an algorithm is called \emph{single-exponential}) has been presented in [Fomin et al., FOCS 2012] under the condition that every graph in $\mathcal{F}$ is connected. Using our algorithm to construct protrusion decompositions as a building block, we get rid of this connectivity constraint and present an algorithm for the general Planar-$\mathcal{F}$-Deletion problem running in time $2^{O(k)} n^2$., Comment: We would like to point out that this article replaces and extends the results of [CoRR, abs/1201.2780, 2012]

A circle graph is the intersection graph of a set of chords in a circle. Keil [Discrete Applied Mathematics, 42(1):51-63, 1993] proved that Dominating Set, Connected Dominating Set, and Total Dominating Set are NP-complete in circle graphs. To the best of our knowledge, nothing was known about the parameterized complexity of these problems in circle graphs. In this paper we prove the following results, which contribute in this direction: - Dominating Set, Independent Dominating Set, Connected Dominating Set, Total Dominating Set, and Acyclic Dominating Set are W[1]-hard in circle graphs, parameterized by the size of the solution. - Whereas both Connected Dominating Set and Acyclic Dominating Set are W[1]-hard in circle graphs, it turns out that Connected Acyclic Dominating Set is polynomial-time solvable in circle graphs. - If T is a given tree, deciding whether a circle graph has a dominating set isomorphic to T is NP-complete when T is in the input, and FPT when parameterized by |V(T)|. We prove that the FPT algorithm is subexponential.

Given an input graph G and an integer k, the parameterized K_4-minor cover problem asks whether there is a set S of at most k vertices whose deletion results in a K_4-minor-free graph, or equivalently in a graph of treewidth at most 2. This problem is inspired by two well-studied parameterized vertex deletion problems, Vertex Cover and Feedback Vertex Set, which can also be expressed as Treewidth-t Vertex Deletion problems: t=0 for Vertex Cover and t=1 for Feedback Vertex Set. While a single-exponential FPT algorithm has been known for a long time for \textsc{Vertex Cover}, such an algorithm for Feedback Vertex Set was devised comparatively recently. While it is known to be unlikely that Treewidth-t Vertex Deletion can be solved in time c^{o(k)}.n^{O(1)}, it was open whether the K_4-minor cover problem could be solved in single-exponential FPT time, i.e. in c^k.n^{O(1)} time. This paper answers this question in the affirmative.

The "c-pumpkin" is the graph with two vertices linked by c>0 parallel edges. A c-pumpkin-model in a graph G is a pair A,B of disjoint subsets of vertices of G, each inducing a connected subgraph of G, such that there are at least c edges in G between A and B. We focus on covering and packing c-pumpkin-models in a given graph: On the one hand, we provide an FPT algorithm running in time 2^O(k) n^O(1) deciding, for any fixed c>0, whether all c-pumpkin-models can be covered by at most k vertices. This generalizes known single-exponential FPT algorithms for Vertex Cover and Feedback Vertex Set, which correspond to the cases c=1,2 respectively. On the other hand, we present a O(log n)-approximation algorithm for both the problems of covering all c-pumpkin-models with a smallest number of vertices, and packing a maximum number of vertex-disjoint c-pumpkin-models., Comment: v2: several minor changes

Vertex deletion and edge deletion problems play a central role in Parameterized Complexity. Examples include classical problems like Feedback Vertex Set, Odd Cycle Transversal, and Chordal Deletion. Interestingly, the study of edge contraction problems of this type from a parameterized perspective has so far been left largely unexplored. We consider two basic edge contraction problems, which we call Path-Contractibility and Tree-Contractibility. Both problems take an undirected graph $G$ and an integer $k$ as input, and the task is to determine whether we can obtain a path or an acyclic graph, respectively, by contracting at most $k$ edges of $G$. Our main contribution is an algorithm with running time $4^{k+O(\log^2 k)} + n^{O(1)}$ for Path-Contractibility and an algorithm with running time $4.88^k n^{O(1)}$ for Tree-Contractibility, based on a novel application of the color coding technique of Alon, Yuster and Zwick. Furthermore, we show that Path-Contractibility has a kernel with at most $5k+3$ vertices, while Tree-Contractibility does not have a polynomial kernel unless coNP $\subseteq$ NP/poly. We find the latter result surprising, because of the strong connection between Tree-Contractibility and Feedback Vertex Set, which is known to have a vertex kernel with size $O(k^2)$.

Split decomposition of graphs was introduced by Cunningham (under the name join decomposition) as a generalization of the modular decomposition. This paper undertakes an investigation into the algorithmic properties of split decomposition. We do so in the context of graph-labelled trees (GLTs), a new combinatorial object designed to simplify its consideration. GLTs are used to derive an incremental characterization of split decomposition, with a simple combinatorial description, and to explore its properties with respect to Lexicographic Breadth-First Search (LBFS). Applying the incremental characterization to an LBFS ordering results in a split decomposition algorithm that runs in time $O(n+m)\alpha(n+m)$, where $\alpha$ is the inverse Ackermann function, whose value is smaller than 4 for any practical graph. Compared to Dahlhaus' linear-time split decomposition algorithm [Dahlhaus'00], which does not rely on an incremental construction, our algorithm is just as fast in all but the asymptotic sense and full implementation details are given in this paper. Also, our algorithm extends to circle graph recognition, whereas no such extension is known for Dahlhaus' algorithm. The companion paper [Gioan et al.] uses our algorithm to derive the first sub-quadratic circle graph recognition algorithm.

Circle graphs are the intersection graphs of chords in a circle. This paper presents the first sub-quadratic recognition algorithm for the class of circle graphs. Our algorithm is O(n + m) times the inverse Ackermann function, {\alpha}(n + m), whose value is smaller than 4 for any practical graph. The algorithm is based on a new incremental Lexicographic Breadth-First Search characterization of circle graphs, and a new efficient data-structure for circle graphs, both developed in the paper. The algorithm is an extension of a Split Decomposition algorithm with the same running time developed by the authors in a companion paper.

We initiate the study of the Bipartite Contraction problem from the perspective of parameterized complexity. In this problem we are given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, and the task is to determine whether we can obtain a bipartite graph from $G$ by a sequence of at most $k$ edge contractions. Our main result is an $f(k) n^{O(1)}$ time algorithm for Bipartite Contraction. Despite a strong resemblance between Bipartite Contraction and the classical Odd Cycle Transversal (OCT) problem, the methods developed to tackle OCT do not seem to be directly applicable to Bipartite Contraction. Our algorithm is based on a novel combination of the irrelevant vertex technique, introduced by Robertson and Seymour, and the concept of important separators. Both techniques have previously been used as key components of algorithms for fundamental problems in parameterized complexity. However, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time the two techniques are applied in unison.

We develop a technique that we call Conflict Packing in the context of kernelization, obtaining (and improving) several polynomial kernels for editing problems on dense instances. We apply this technique on several well-studied problems: Feedback Arc Set in (Bipartite) Tournaments, Dense Rooted Triplet Inconsistency and Betweenness in Tournaments. For the former, one is given a (bipartite) tournament $T = (V,A)$ and seeks a set of at most $k$ arcs whose reversal in $T$ results in an acyclic (bipartite) tournament. While a linear vertex-kernel is already known for the first problem, using the Conflict Packing allows us to find a so-called safe partition, the central tool of the kernelization algorithm in, with simpler arguments. For the case of bipartite tournaments, the same technique allows us to obtain a quadratic vertex-kernel. Again, such a kernel was already known to exist, using the concept of so-called bimodules. We believe however that providing an unifying technique to cope with such problems is interesting. Regarding Dense Rooted Triplet Inconsistency, one is given a set of vertices $V$ and a dense collection $\mathcal{R}$ of rooted binary trees over three vertices of $V$ and seeks a rooted tree over $V$ containing all but at most $k$ triplets from $\mathcal{R}$. As a main consequence of our technique, we prove that the Dense Rooted Triplet Inconsistency problem admits a linear vertex-kernel. This result improves the best known bound of $O(k^2)$ vertices for this problem. Finally, we use this technique to obtain a linear vertex-kernel for Betweenness in Tournaments, where one is given a set of vertices $V$ and a dense collection $\mathcal{R}$ of so-called betweenness triplets and seeks a linear ordering of the vertices containing all but at most $k$ triplets from $\mathcal{R}$.

Given a graph G = (V,E) and an integer k, an edge modification problem for a graph property P consists in deciding whether there exists a set of edges F of size at most k such that the graph H = (V,E \vartriangle F) satisfies the property P. In the P edge-completion problem, the set F of edges is constrained to be disjoint from E; in the P edge-deletion problem, F is a subset of E; no constraint is imposed on F in the P edge-edition problem. A number of optimization problems can be expressed in terms of graph modification problems which have been extensively studied in the context of parameterized complexity. When parameterized by the size k of the edge set F, it has been proved that if P is an hereditary property characterized by a finite set of forbidden induced subgraphs, then the three P edge-modification problems are FPT. It was then natural to ask whether these problems also admit a polynomial size kernel. Using recent lower bound techniques, Kratsch and Wahlstrom answered this question negatively. However, the problem remains open on many natural graph classes characterized by forbidden induced subgraphs. Kratsch and Wahlstrom asked whether the result holds when the forbidden subgraphs are paths or cycles and pointed out that the problem is already open in the case of P4-free graphs (i.e. cographs). This paper provides positive and negative results in that line of research. We prove that parameterized cograph edge modification problems have cubic vertex kernels whereas polynomial kernels are unlikely to exist for the Pl-free and Cl-free edge-deletion problems for large enough l.

The modular decomposition is a technique that applies but is not restricted to graphs. The notion of module naturally appears in the proofs of many graph theoretical theorems. Computing the modular decomposition tree is an important preprocessing step to solve a large number of combinatorial optimization problems. Since the first polynomial time algorithm in the early 70's, the algorithmic of the modular decomposition has known an important development. This paper survey the ideas and techniques that arose from this line of research.

A tournament T=(V,A) is a directed graph in which there is exactly one arc between every pair of distinct vertices. Given a digraph on n vertices and an integer parameter k, the Feedback Arc Set problem asks whether the given digraph has a set of k arcs whose removal results in an acyclic digraph. The Feedback Arc Set problem restricted to tournaments is known as the k-Feedback Arc Set in Tournaments (k-FAST) problem. In this paper we obtain a linear vertex kernel for k-FAST. That is, we give a polynomial time algorithm which given an input instance T to k-FAST obtains an equivalent instance T' on O(k) vertices. In fact, given any fixed e>0, the kernelized instance has at most (2+e)k vertices. Our result improves the previous known bound of O(k^2) on the kernel size for k-FAST. Our kernelization algorithm solves the problem on a subclass of tournaments in polynomial time and uses a known polynomial time approximation scheme for k-FAST.

In this paper, we revisit the split decomposition of graphs and give new combinatorial and algorithmic results for the class of totally decomposable graphs, also known as the distance hereditary graphs, and for two non-trivial subclasses, namely the cographs and the 3-leaf power graphs. Precisely, we give strutural and incremental characterizations, leading to optimal fully-dynamic recognition algorithms for vertex and edge modifications, for each of these classes. These results rely on a new framework to represent the split decomposition, namely the graph-labelled trees, which also captures the modular decomposition of graphs and thereby unify these two decompositions techniques. The point of the paper is to use bijections between these graph classes and trees whose nodes are labelled by cliques and stars. Doing so, we are also able to derive an intersection model for distance hereditary graphs, which answers an open problem., Comment: extended abstract appeared in ISAAC 2007: Dynamic distance hereditary graphs using split decompositon. In International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation - ISAAC. Number 4835 in Lecture Notes, pages 41-51, 2007

A graph G=(V,E) is a 3-leaf power iff there exists a tree T whose leaves are V and such that (u,v) is an edge iff u and v are at distance at most 3 in T. The 3-leaf power graph edge modification problems, i.e. edition (also known as the closest 3-leaf power), completion and edge-deletion, are FTP when parameterized by the size of the edge set modification. However polynomial kernel was known for none of these three problems. For each of them, we provide cubic kernels that can be computed in linear time for each of these problems. We thereby answer an open problem first mentioned by Dom, Guo, Huffner and Niedermeier (2005)., Comment: Submitted

This paper has been withdrawn by the corresponding author because the newest version is now published in Discrete Applied Mathematics., Comment: Published in Discrete Applied Mathematics

A module of a graph G is a set of vertices that have the same set of neighbours outside. Modules of a graphs form a so-called partitive family and thereby can be represented by a unique tree MD(G), called the modular decomposition tree. Motivated by the central role of modules in numerous algorithmic graph theory questions, the problem of efficiently computing MD(G) has been investigated since the early 70's. To date the best algorithms run in linear time but are all rather complicated. By combining previous algorithmic paradigms developed for the problem, we are able to present a simpler linear-time that relies on very simple data-structures, namely slice decomposition and sequences of rooted ordered trees., Comment: An EA of this work appeared in ICALP'08. The arXiv v2 contains an appendix with some sketches of proofs. To date, complete proofs can only be found in the PhD of M. Tedder and spread over several chapters. This is a self-contained version. To ease the understanding, the noveI presentation enlights the combinatorial objects involved in the algorithm, which still relies on the same ideas