Search

Poly(ADP-ribose)ylation or PARylation by PAR polymerase 1 (PARP1) and dePARylation by poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) are equally important for the dynamic regulation of DNA damage response. PARG, the most active dePARylation enzyme, is recruited to sites of DNA damage via pADPr-dependent and PCNA-dependent mechanisms. Targeting dePARylation is considered an alternative strategy to overcome PARP inhibitor resistance. However, precisely how dePARylation functions in normal unperturbed cells remains elusive. To address this challenge, we conducted multiple CRISPR screens and revealed that dePARylation of S phase pADPr by PARG is essential for cell viability. Loss of dePARylation activity initially induced S-phase-specific pADPr signaling, which resulted from unligated Okazaki fragments and eventually led to uncontrolled pADPr accumulation and PARP1/2-dependent cytotoxicity. Moreover, we demonstrated that proteins involved in Okazaki fragment ligation and/or base excision repair regulate pADPr signaling and cell death induced by PARG inhibition. In addition, we determined that PARG expression is critical for cellular sensitivity to PARG inhibition. Additionally, we revealed that PARG is essential for cell survival by suppressing pADPr. Collectively, our data not only identify an essential role for PARG in normal proliferating cells but also provide a potential biomarker for the further development of PARG inhibitors in cancer therapy.

Arrival of the novel SARS-CoV-2 has launched a worldwide effort to identify both pre-approved and novel therapeutics targeting the viral proteome, highlighting the urgent need for efficient drug discovery strategies. Even with effective vaccines, infection is possible, and at-risk populations would benefit from effective drug compounds that reduce the lethality and lasting damage of COVID-19 infection. The CoV-2 MacroD-like macrodomain (Mac1) is implicated in viral pathogenicity by disrupting host innate immunity through its mono (ADP-ribosyl) hydrolase activity, making it a prime target for antiviral therapy. We therefore solved the structure of CoV-2 Mac1 from non-structural protein 3 (Nsp3) and applied structural and sequence-based genetic tracing, including newly determined A. pompejana MacroD2 and GDAP2 amino acid sequences, to compare and contrast CoV-2 Mac1 with the functionally related human DNA-damage signaling factor poly (ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG). Previously, identified targetable features of the PARG active site allowed us to develop a pharmacologically useful PARG inhibitor (PARGi). Here, we developed a focused chemical library and determined 6 novel PARGi X-ray crystal structures for comparative analysis. We applied this knowledge to discovery of CoV-2 Mac1 inhibitors by combining computation and structural analysis to identify PARGi fragments with potential to bind the distal-ribose and adenosyl pockets of the CoV-2 Mac1 active site. Scaffold development of these PARGi fragments has yielded two novel compounds, PARG-345 and PARG-329, that crystallize within the Mac1 active site, providing critical structure-activity data and a pathway for inhibitor optimization. The reported structural findings demonstrate ways to harness our PARGi synthesis and characterization pipeline to develop CoV-2 Mac1 inhibitors targeting the ADP-ribose active site. Together, these structural and computational analyses reveal a path for accelerating development of antiviral therapeutics from pre-existing drug optimization pipelines.

Aim: To explore the relationship between poly(ADP‐ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) and the occurrence, development, and prognosis of endometrial carcinoma (EC), and investigate whether the PARG inhibitor PDD0017273 could increase the sensitivity of EC cells to cisplatin. Methods: The expression of PARG, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), and p53 in normal endometrial tissues (NE), endometrial hyperplasia without atypia (EH), atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AH), and EC was detected by immunohistochemistry. AN3CA EC cells with PTEN deficiency were treated with different cisplatin and PDD0017273, alone or in combination. Cell proliferation was detected by MTT method, apoptosis was detected by flow cytometry, and the expression of PARG in EC cells after treatment with different drugs was detected by western blot and immunohistochemistry. Results: Expression of PARG in NE, EH, AH, and EC increased gradually. In addition, compared with low PARG expression in PTEN‐positive EC, patients who had high PARG expression in PTEN‐negative EC had more advanced clinical stages (r = −0.399, p = 0.032) and shorter overall survival time (p = 0.037). A dose of 40 μM PDD0017273 effectively inhibited PARG expression, increased the sensitivity of AN3CA cells to cisplatin. Conclusions: The findings suggest that PARG overexpression is a promising immunohistochemical marker to predict the occurrence and prognosis of EC. Moreover, PARG inhibition produced antitumor effects and increased the sensitivity of EC cells with PTEN deficiency to cisplatin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Poly(ADP‐ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) is a key enzyme in poly(ADP‐ribose) (PAR) metabolism and a potential anticancer target. Many drug candidates have been developed to inhibit its enzymatic activity. Additionally, PDD00017273 is an effective and selective inhibitor of PARG at the first cellular level. Aims Using human colorectal cancer (CRC) HCT116 cells, we investigated the molecular mechanisms and tumor biological aspects of the resistance to PDD00017273. Methods and results HCT116RPDD, a variant of the human CRC cell line HCT116, exhibits resistance to the PARG inhibitor PDD00017273. HCT116RPDD cells contained specific mutations of PARG and PARP1, namely, PARG mutation Glu352Gln and PARP1 mutation Lys134Asn, as revealed by exome sequencing. Notably, the levels of PARG protein were comparable between HCT116RPDD and HCT116. In contrast, the PARP1 protein levels in HCT116RPDD were significantly lower than those in HCT116. Consequently, the levels of intracellular poly(ADP‐ribosyl)ation were elevated in HCT116RPDD compared to HCT116. Interestingly, HCT116RPDD cells did not exhibit cross‐resistance to COH34, an additional PARG inhibitor. Conclusion Our findings suggest that the mutated PARG acquires PDD00017273 resistance due to structural modifications. In addition, our findings indicate that PDD00017273 resistance induces mutation and PARP downregulation. These discoveries collectively provide a better understanding of the anticancer candidate PARG inhibitors in terms of resistance mechanisms and anticancer strategies.

Poly (ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) is a dePARylating enzyme which promotes DNA repair by removal of poly (ADP-ribose) (PAR) from PARylated proteins. Loss or inhibition of PARG results in replication stress and sensitizes cancer cells to DNA-damaging agents. PARG inhibitors are now undergoing clinical development for patients having tumors with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), such as cancer patients with germline or somatic BRCA1/2 -mutations. PARP inhibitors kill BRCA-deficient cancer cells by increasing single-stranded DNA gaps (ssGAPs) during replication. Here, we report that, like PARP inhibitor (PARPi), PARG inhibitor (PARGi) treatment also causes an accumulation of ssGAPs in sensitive cells. PARGi exposure increased accumulation of S-phase-specific PAR, a marker for Okazaki fragment processing (OFP) defects on lagging strands and induced ssGAPs, in sensitive cells but not in resistant cells. PARGi also caused accumulation of PAR at the replication forks and at the ssDNA sites in sensitive cells. Additionally, PARGi exhibited monotherapy activity in specific HR-deficient, as well as HR-proficient, patient-derived, or patient-derived xenograft (PDX)-derived organoids of ovarian cancer, and drug sensitivity directly correlated with the accumulation of ssGAPs. Taken together, PARGi treatment results in toxic accumulation of PAR at replication forks resulting in ssGAPs due to OFP defects during replication. Regardless of the BRCA/ HRD - status, the induction of ssGAPs in preclinical models of ovarian cancer cells correlates with PARGi sensitivity. Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) may be a useful model system for testing PARGi sensitivity and functional biomarkers., Competing Interests: Competing interests statement:A.D.D. reports consulting for AbbVie, Deerfield Management Company L.P., Impact Therapeutics, PrimeFour Therapeutics, Schrödinger Inc., and Servier Bio-Innovation LLC; is an Advisory Board member for Covant Therapeutics, and Impact Therapeutics; stockholder in Impact Therapeutics, and PrimeFour Therapeutics; and reports receiving commercial research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Moderna, and Tango Therapeutics. G.I.S. reports grant support from Merck KGaA/EMD-Serono, Tango Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Merck & Co., all related to DNA repair inhibitors, as well as from Eli Lilly and Pfizer. He has served on advisory boards for Merck KGaA/EMD-Serono, Circle Pharmaceuticals, Schrödinger, Janssen and Xinthera. He holds patents entitled, “Dosage regimen for sapacitabine and seliciclib,” also issued to Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals, and “Compositions and methods for predicting response and resistance to CDK4/6 inhibition.” J. Liu reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Clovis Oncology, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Regeneron Therapeutics, Revolution Medicine, Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, and Deciphera Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work and institutional funding for clinical trials from 2X Oncology, Aravive, Arch Oncology, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Clovis Oncology, GlaxoSmithKline, Impact Therapeutics, Pfizer, Regeneron, Seagen, SystImmune, Vigeo Therapeutics, and Zentalis Pharmaceuticals.

Abstract Background Patients with ovarian cancer often present at advanced stage and, following initial treatment success, develop recurrent drug-resistant disease. PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are yielding unprecedented survival benefits for women with BRCA-deficient disease. However, options remain limited for disease that is platinum-resistant and/or has inherent or acquired PARPi-resistance. PARG, the PAR glycohydrolase that counterbalances PARP activity, is an emerging target with potential to selectively kill tumour cells harbouring oncogene-induced DNA replication and metabolic vulnerabilities. Clinical development of PARG inhibitors (PARGi) will however require predictive biomarkers, in turn requiring an understanding of their mode of action. Furthermore, differential sensitivity to PARPi is key for expanding treatment options available for patients. Methods A panel of 10 ovarian cancer cell lines and a living biobank of patient-derived ovarian cancer models (OCMs) were screened for PARGi-sensitivity using short- and long-term growth assays. PARGi-sensitivity was characterized using established markers for DNA replication stress, namely replication fibre asymmetry, RPA foci, KAP1 and Chk1 phosphorylation, and pan-nuclear γH2AX, indicating DNA replication catastrophe. Finally, gene expression in sensitive and resistant cells was also examined using NanoString or RNAseq. Results PARGi sensitivity was identified in both ovarian cancer cell lines and patient-derived OCMs, with sensitivity accompanied by markers of persistent replication stress, and a pre-mitotic cell cycle block. Moreover, DNA replication genes are down-regulated in PARGi-sensitive cell lines consistent with an inherent DNA replication vulnerability. However, DNA replication gene expression did not predict PARGi-sensitivity in OCMs. The subset of patient-derived OCMs that are sensitive to single-agent PARG inhibition, includes models that are PARPi- and/or platinum-resistant, indicating that PARG inhibitors may represent an alternative treatment strategy for women with otherwise limited therapeutic options. Conclusions We discover that a subset of ovarian cancers are intrinsically sensitive to pharmacological PARG blockade, including drug-resistant disease, underpinned by a common mechanism of replication catastrophe. We explore the use of a transcript-based biomarker, and provide insight into the design of future clinical trials of PARGi in patients with ovarian cancer. However, our results highlight the complexity of developing a predictive biomarker for PARGi sensitivity.

Background: Patients with ovarian cancer often present at advanced stage and, following initial treatment success, develop recurrent drug-resistant disease. PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are yielding unprecedented survival benefits for women with BRCA-deficient disease. However, options remain limited for disease that is platinum-resistant and/or has inherent or acquired PARPi-resistance. PARG, the PAR glycohydrolase that counterbalances PARP activity, is an emerging target with potential to selectively kill tumour cells harbouring oncogene-induced DNA replication and metabolic vulnerabilities. Clinical development of PARG inhibitors (PARGi) will however require predictive biomarkers, in turn requiring an understanding of their mode of action. Furthermore, differential sensitivity to PARPi is key for expanding treatment options available for patients. Methods: A panel of 10 ovarian cancer cell lines and a living biobank of patient-derived ovarian cancer models (OCMs) were screened for PARGi-sensitivity using short- and long-term growth assays. PARGi-sensitivity was characterized using established markers for DNA replication stress, namely replication fibre asymmetry, RPA foci, KAP1 and Chk1 phosphorylation, and pan-nuclear γH2AX, indicating DNA replication catastrophe. Finally, gene expression in sensitive and resistant cells was also examined using NanoString or RNAseq. Results: PARGi sensitivity was identified in both ovarian cancer cell lines and patient-derived OCMs, with sensitivity accompanied by markers of persistent replication stress, and a pre-mitotic cell cycle block. Moreover, DNA replication genes are down-regulated in PARGi-sensitive cell lines consistent with an inherent DNA replication vulnerability. However, DNA replication gene expression did not predict PARGi-sensitivity in OCMs. The subset of patient-derived OCMs that are sensitive to single-agent PARG inhibition, includes models that are PARPi- and/or platinum-resistant, indicating that PARG inhibitors may represent an alternative treatment strategy for women with otherwise limited therapeutic options. Conclusions: We discover that a subset of ovarian cancers are intrinsically sensitive to pharmacological PARG blockade, including drug-resistant disease, underpinned by a common mechanism of replication catastrophe. We explore the use of a transcript-based biomarker, and provide insight into the design of future clinical trials of PARGi in patients with ovarian cancer. However, our results highlight the complexity of developing a predictive biomarker for PARGi sensitivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Poly(ADP-ribose)ylation or PARylation by PAR polymerase 1 (PARP1) and dePARylation by poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) are equally important for the dynamic regulation of DNA damage response. PARG, the most active dePARylation enzyme, is recruited to sites of DNA damage via pADPr-dependent and PCNA-dependent mechanisms. Targeting dePARylation is considered an alternative strategy to overcome PARP inhibitor resistance. However, precisely how dePARylation functions in normal unperturbed cells remains elusive. To address this challenge, we conducted multiple CRISPR screens and revealed that dePARylation of S phase pADPr by PARG is essential for cell viability. Loss of dePARylation activity initially induced S-phase-specific pADPr signaling, which resulted from unligated Okazaki fragments and eventually led to uncontrolled pADPr accumulation and PARP1/2-dependent cytotoxicity. Moreover, we demonstrated that proteins involved in Okazaki fragment ligation and/or base excision repair regulate pADPr signaling and cell death induced by PARG inhibition. In addition, we determined that PARG expression is critical for cellular sensitivity to PARG inhibition. Additionally, we revealed that PARG is essential for cell survival by suppressing pADPr. Collectively, our data not only identify an essential role for PARG in normal proliferating cells but also provide a potential biomarker for the further development of PARG inhibitors in cancer therapy., Competing Interests: LN, CW, MH, XL, XF, MT, SL, QH, HT, XS, LM, BG, JC No competing interests declared, (© 2023, Nie, Wang, Huang et al.)

The timely removal of ADP-ribosylation is crucial for efficient DNA repair. However, much remains to be discovered about ADP-ribosylhydrolases. Here, we characterize the physiological role of TARG1, an ADP-ribosylhydrolase that removes aspartate/glutamate-linked ADP-ribosylation. We reveal its function in the DNA damage response and show that the loss of TARG1 sensitizes cells to inhibitors of topoisomerase II, ATR, and PARP. Furthermore, we find a PARP1-mediated synthetic lethal interaction between TARG1 and PARG, driven by the toxic accumulation of ADP-ribosylation, that induces replication stress and genomic instability. Finally, we show that histone PARylation factor 1 (HPF1) deficiency exacerbates the toxicity and genomic instability induced by excessive ADP-ribosylation, suggesting a close crosstalk between components of the serine- and aspartate/glutamate-linked ADP-ribosylation pathways. Altogether, our data identify TARG1 as a potential biomarker for the response of cancer cells to PARP and PARG inhibition and establish that the interplay of TARG1 and PARG protects cells against genomic instability. [Display omitted] • TARG1 deficiency leads to DNA repair defects that can be exploited therapeutically • TARG1 and PARG suppression is synthetically lethal and induces replication stress • TARG1 levels could predict cancer cell sensitivity to PARP and PARG inhibition • TARG1 and PARG protect cells against toxic PARP1-mediated ADP-ribosylation Groslambert et al. identify TARG1 and PARG as factors protecting cells from toxic PARP1-mediated aspartate/glutamate-linked ADP-ribosylation and genotoxic stress. This underpins the finding of synthetic lethality between TARG1 and PARG, which is further exacerbated by HPF1 deficiency and reveals vulnerabilities in cancer cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) is a key enzyme in poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) metabolism and a potential anticancer target. Many drug candidates have been developed to inhibit its enzymatic activity. Additionally, PDD00017273 is an effective and selective inhibitor of PARG at the first cellular level., Aims: Using human colorectal cancer (CRC) HCT116 cells, we investigated the molecular mechanisms and tumor biological aspects of the resistance to PDD00017273., Methods and Results: HCT116R PDD , a variant of the human CRC cell line HCT116, exhibits resistance to the PARG inhibitor PDD00017273. HCT116R PDD cells contained specific mutations of PARG and PARP1, namely, PARG mutation Glu352Gln and PARP1 mutation Lys134Asn, as revealed by exome sequencing. Notably, the levels of PARG protein were comparable between HCT116R PDD and HCT116. In contrast, the PARP1 protein levels in HCT116R PDD were significantly lower than those in HCT116. Consequently, the levels of intracellular poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation were elevated in HCT116R PDD compared to HCT116. Interestingly, HCT116R PDD cells did not exhibit cross-resistance to COH34, an additional PARG inhibitor., Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the mutated PARG acquires PDD00017273 resistance due to structural modifications. In addition, our findings indicate that PDD00017273 resistance induces mutation and PARP downregulation. These discoveries collectively provide a better understanding of the anticancer candidate PARG inhibitors in terms of resistance mechanisms and anticancer strategies., (© 2022 The Authors. Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

PolyADP-ribosylation is a posttranslational modification of proteins that results from enzymatic synthesis of poly(ADP-ribose) with NAD + as the substrate. A unique characteristic of polyADP-ribosylation is that the poly(ADP-ribose) chain can have 200 or more ADP-ribose residues in branched patterns, and the presence and variety of these chains can have substantive effects on protein function. To understand how polyADP-ribosylation affects biological processes, it is important to know the physiological level of poly(ADP-ribose) in cells. Under normal cell physiological conditions and in the absence of any exogenous DNA damaging agents, we found that the concentration of poly(ADP-ribose) in HeLa cells is approximately 0.04 pmol (25 pg)/10 6 cells, as measured with a double-antibody sandwich, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay protocol that avoids artificial activation of PARP1 during cell lysis. Notably, this system demonstrated that the poly(ADP-ribose) level peaks in S phase and that the average cellular turnover of a single poly(ADP-ribose) is less than 40 s., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Abstract: Poly(ADP-ribose) is synthesized from nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1) and degraded by poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG). The aim of the present study was to examine the role of PARG in the development of experimental colitis. To address this question, we used an experimental model of colitis, induced by dinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (DNBS). Mice lacking the functional 110-kDa isoform of PARG (PARG110KO mice) were resistant to colon injury induced by DNBS. The mucosa of colon tissues showed reduction of myeloperoxidase activity and attenuated staining for intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1. Moreover, overproduction of proinflammatory factors TNF-α and IL-1β and activation of cell death signaling pathway, i.e., the FAS ligand, were inhibited in these mutant mice. Finally pharmacological treatment of WT mice with GPI 16552 and 18214, two novel PARG inhibitors, showed a significant protective effect in DNBS-induced colitis. These genetic and pharmacological studies demonstrate that PARG modulates the inflammatory response and tissue injury events associated with colitis and PARG may be considered as a novel target for pharmacological intervention for the pathogenesis. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Poly (ADP-ribosyl)ation, an early posttranslational modification in response to DNA damage, is catalyzed by poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP-1) and catabolized by poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG). The aim of this study was to investigate the role of PARG on the modulation of the inflammatory response caused by splanchnic ischemia and reperfusion. SAO shock in rats and wild-type (WT) mice was associated with a significant neutrophil infiltration in the ileum and production of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). Reperfused ileum tissue sections from SAO-shocked WT mice and rats showed positive staining for P-selectin and ICAM-1 localized mainly in the vascular endothelial cells. Genetic disruption of the PARG gene in mice or pharmacological inhibition of PARG by PARG inhibitors significantly improved the histological status of the reperfused tissues associated with reduced expression of P-selectin and ICAM-1, neutrophil infiltration into the reperfused intestine, and TNF-α production. These results suggest that PARG activity modulates the inflammatory response in ischemia/ reperfusion and participates in end (target) organ damage under these conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oxidative and replication stress underlie genomic instability of cancer cells. Amplifying genomic instability through radiotherapy and chemotherapy has been a powerful but nonselective means of killing cancer cells. Precision medicine has revolutionized cancer therapy by putting forth the concept of selective targeting of cancer cells. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors represent a successful example of precision medicine as the first drugs targeting DNA damage response to have entered the clinic. PARP inhibitors act through synthetic lethality with mutations in DNA repair genes and were approved for the treatment of BRCA mutated ovarian and breast cancer. PARP inhibitors destabilize replication forks through PARP DNA entrapment and induce cell death through replication stress-induced mitotic catastrophe. Inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) exploit and exacerbate replication deficiencies of cancer cells and may complement PARP inhibitors in targeting a broad range of cancer types with different sources of genomic instability. Here I provide an overview of the molecular mechanisms and cellular consequences of PARP and PARG inhibition. I highlight clinical performance of four PARP inhibitors used in cancer therapy (olaparib, rucaparib, niraparib, and talazoparib) and discuss the predictive biomarkers of inhibitor sensitivity, mechanisms of resistance as well as the means of overcoming them through combination therapy., (© 2020 Slade; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.)