Search

Your search keyword '"PAN Studio Associato"' showing total 3 results
Start Over Author "PAN Studio Associato"
3 results on '"PAN Studio Associato"'

1. Biologico 'Si', biologico 'No': una discussione tra specialisti con il Parlamento Italiano nel gioco

Author

Aubert, Michaël, Banas, Damien, Bernier, Nicolas, BLOUIN, Manuel, Bolzonella, Cristian, Bonneval, Karine, Brun, Jean-Jacques, Fritz, Ines, Giannini, Raffaello, Hager, Herbert, Katzensteiner, Klaus, Lowenfels, Jeff, Menta, Cristina, Micheloni, Cristina, Paoletti, Maurizio, Pelosi, Céline, Piccolo, Alessandro, Ponge, Jean-François, Surinder, Kukal, Tassinato, Efrem, Teo, Gianni, Tomasi, Mauro, Zanella, Augusto, Étude et compréhension de la biodiversité (ECODIV), Université de Rouen Normandie (UNIROUEN), Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU), Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Agronomie et des Industries Alimentaires (ENSAIA), Université de Lorraine (UL), Département Adaptations du vivant (AVIV), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (MNHN), Agroécologie [Dijon], Université de Bourgogne (UB)-AgroSup Dijon - Institut National Supérieur des Sciences Agronomiques, de l'Alimentation et de l'Environnement-Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] (UBFC)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry (TeSAF), Universita degli Studi di Padova, Ecole Supérieure des Arts Décoratifs de Strasbourg, Ecole Supérieure des Arts Décoratifs de Strasbourg (ESAD), Ministère de l'Education nationale, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche (M.E.N.E.S.R.)-Ministère de l'Education nationale, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche (M.E.N.E.S.R.), IRSTEA - Center of Grenoble, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Università degli Studi di Firenze = University of Florence [Firenze] (UNIFI), Garden Writers of America, University of Parma = Università degli studi di Parma [Parme, Italie], Associazione Italiana per l'Agricoltura Biologica (AIAB), Environnement Méditerranéen et Modélisation des Agro-Hydrosystèmes (EMMAH), Avignon Université (AU)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Università degli studi di Napoli Federico II, Mécanismes Adaptatifs et Evolution (MECADEV), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (MNHN)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Punjab Agricultural University, Wigwam Network, Azienda Agricola ColBel, and PAN Studio Associato

Subjects
SETA, alimentazione biologica, agricoltura, biodinamica, produzione di alimenti, Parlamento italiano, [SDV.EE.ECO]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Ecology, environment/Ecosystems, Humusica, [SDV.SA.SDS]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Soil study, [SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology, global change, agricoltura biologica
Abstract

Il gruppo SETA (Scienze e tecnologie agrarie) ha inviato una lettera al Parlamento italiano in cui consigliava di non adottare una misura legislativa a favore dell'agricoltura biologica e biodinamica rispetto a quella convenzionale. Un altro gruppo di scienziati ritiene invece che il governo italiano debba favorire l'agricoltura biologica e biodinamica e ne spiega le ragioni. Il presente articolo espone prima la lettera SETA, e poi il punto di vista di altri ecologi, economisti, pedologi, ecologi, scrittori e artisti italiani e internazionali, tendenzialmente "protettori della natura" ma non idealisti. Non sono nemmeno perfettamente d'accordo tra di loro. Giudicate voi stessi scorrendo la parte Discussione. La divergenza porta sul "perché" sia necessario passare all'agricoltura biologica ma non sulla "necessità" di farlo. Ci sono anche differenze di opinioni sull'uso di OGM o sul come comportarsi verso i costi di un'agricoltura altamente tecnologica. La situazione è tale sul pianeta Terra che è necessario coinvolgere l'intera società per uscire dal tunnel. Ai politici viene chiesto di strutturare l'azione collettiva che solo se concepita da tutta la società e non da individui o da organizzazioni non coordinate può salvare la nostra specie. Siamo convinti che l'agricoltura e in particolare le modalità di sfruttamento del suolo siano tra le leve fondamentali di quest’azione.

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Organic food 'Yes', organic food 'No': a discussion between specialists with the Italian Parliament in the fray

Author

Michaël Aubert, Karine Bonneval, Cristina Menta, Damien Banas, Jeff Lowenfels, Nicolas Bernier, Cristina Micheloni, Alessandro Piccolo, Jean-Jacques Brun, Herbert Hager, Cristian Bolzonella, Mauro Tomasi, Kukal Singh, Ines Fritz, Jean-François Ponge, Augusto Zanella, Efrem Tassinato, Klaus Katzensteiner, Raffaello Giannini, Manuel Blouin, Maurizio G. Paoletti, Céline Pelosi, Gianni Teo, Étude et compréhension de la biodiversité (ECODIV), Université de Rouen Normandie (UNIROUEN), Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU), Unité de Recherches Animal et Fonctionnalités des Produits Animaux (URAFPA), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université de Lorraine (UL), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (MNHN), Agroécologie [Dijon], Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université de Bourgogne (UB)-AgroSup Dijon - Institut National Supérieur des Sciences Agronomiques, de l'Alimentation et de l'Environnement-Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] (UBFC), Universita degli Studi di Padova, Ecole Supérieure des Arts Décoratifs de Strasbourg, Ecole Supérieure des Arts Décoratifs de Strasbourg (ESAD), Ministère de l'Education nationale, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche (M.E.N.E.S.R.)-Ministère de l'Education nationale, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche (M.E.N.E.S.R.), Ecosystèmes montagnards (UR EMGR), Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA), Universität für Bodenkultur Wien [Vienne, Autriche] (BOKU), Università degli Studi di Firenze [Firenze], Association for Garden Communicators (GWA), Università degli studi di Parma [Parme, Italie], Associazione Italiana per l'Agricoltura Biologica (AIAB), Agronomie, AgroParisTech-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Università degli studi di Napoli Federico II, Mécanismes adaptatifs : des organismes aux communautés (MECADEV), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (MNHN)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Punjab Agricultural University, Wigwam Network, Azienda Agricola ColBel, PAN Studio Associato, Université de Lorraine (UL), University of Padua, Strasbourg School of Decorative Arts, IRSTEA - Center of Grenoble, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences (BOKU), University of Florence (UNIFI), Garden Writers of America, University of Parma, Italian Association for Organic Agriculture (AIAB-FVG), Environnement Méditerranéen et Modélisation des Agro-Hydrosystèmes (EMMAH), Avignon Université (AU)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), University of Naples Federico II, Punjab Agriculltural University, ColBel Farm, PAN Studio Association, Université de Lorraine (UL)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Université de Bourgogne (UB)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] (UBFC)-AgroSup Dijon - Institut National Supérieur des Sciences Agronomiques, de l'Alimentation et de l'Environnement, Università degli Studi di Firenze = University of Florence [Firenze] (UNIFI), University of Parma = Università degli studi di Parma [Parme, Italie], Mécanismes Adaptatifs et Evolution (MECADEV), Normandie Université (NU), Université de Lorraine (UL)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), and University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU)

Subjects
Organic farming, Parliament, media_common.quotation_subject, [SDV.SA.SDS]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Soil study, Collective action, [SDV.EE.ECO]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Ecology, environment/Ecosystems, Food production, Political science, Organic food, SETA, Humusica, Organic farming, Organic food, Food production, Global change, Agriculture, Biodynamic, Italian Parliament, Global change, Law and economics, media_common, 2. Zero hunger, Biodynamic agriculture, Government, business.industry, Biodynamic, Legislature, Agriculture, [SDV.SA.AEP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Agriculture, economy and politics, SETA, Italian parliament, Action (philosophy), 13. Climate action, Humusica, [SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology, business, [SDV.AEN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food and Nutrition
Abstract

International audience; The SETA group (Agricultural Science and Technology) sent a letter to the Italian Parliament advising them not to adopt a legislative measure that favors organic and biodynamic agriculture compared to the conventional one. Another group of scientists thinks instead that the Italian government should favor organic and biodynamic agriculture and explains its reasons. The current article lists the SETA letter and the point of view of other Italian and international ecologists, economists, pedologists, ecologists, writers and artists, which are tendentially “protectors of nature” but not idealists. Nor are they so much in agreement with each other. Judge for yourself in scrolling through the Discussion chapter. The divergence leads to the “why” it is necessary to switch to organic farming not on the “need” to do so. There are also disappointments about the use of GMOs orthe costs of highly technological agriculture. The situation is such on planet Earth that it is necessary to involve the whole society to get out of it. In addition, politicians are also needed to structure the collective action that only if conceived by the whole society and not by individuals or by non-coordinated organizations can save our species. We are convinced that agriculture and soil are among the fundamental levers of this action.

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Fruit availability for migratory birds: a GIS approach.

Author

Tattoni C, Soardi E, Prosser F, Odasso M, Zatelli P, and Ciolli M

Abstract

Bird migration is a widely studied phenomenon, however many factors that influence migratory flows remain unknown or poorly understood. Food availability en route is particularly important for many species and can affect their migration success, pattern and timing but this relationship has not been addressed at a wide scale due to the lack of spatial models of food availability on the terrain. This work presents a GIS-database approach that combines spatial and non-spatial ecological information in order to map fruit availability from vegetation over time in the SE Alps, an important node of European migratory routes. We created a unique database that contains information on the presence and periods of fructification of 52 wild plants carrying berries and a series of original cartographic themes. The presence and coverage of the plant species was modelled with the geo-statistical method of the Gaussian Kernel, which was validated against the ground truth of field sampling data with a correct classification power above 80% in most cases. The highest fruit availability in the study area during September and October co-occurs with the peak of captures of berry eating birds. The maps created and distributed along this work can be useful to address more detailed studies about stopover sites as well as the spatial ecology of other fruit eating animals., Competing Interests: Maurizio Odasso is one of the three owners (also known as associate professionals) of PAN Studio Associato. The authors declare there are no other competing interests.

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results