Search

BackgroundLimited real-world evidence is available for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who received an autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in Germany.ObjectivesThis study aims to describe the real-world survival outcomes of patients with DLBCL who received ASCT in Germany after diagnosis.DesignThis study is a retrospective database analysis covering the period between 2010 and 2019.MethodsUnadjusted overall survival (OS) was plotted using the Kaplan–Meier estimator for the overall population and stratified by relapse status. A Cox regression was run to identify factors that influence OS.ResultsA total of 112 patients received an ASCT, with the average time from first-line treatment to ASCT being 11.7 months. The median OS estimated by Kaplan–Meier was 83.4 months for the entire cohort. The only variable that significantly reduced the OS was the presence of subsequent treatment after ASCT in a time-dependent model.ConclusionOS after ASCT for DLBCL patients in Germany is higher than previously reported and may still be considered a valid option for carefully selected patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL.

IntroductionPoint-of-care (POC) manufacturing of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) modified T cell has expanded rapidly over the last decade. In addition to the use of CD19 CAR T cells for hematological diseases, there is a growing interest in targeting a variety of tumor-associated epitopes.MethodsHere, we report the manufacturing and characterization of autologous anti-CD20 CAR T cells from melanoma patients within phase I clinical trial (NCT03893019). Using a second-generation lentiviral vector for the production of the CD20 CAR T cells on the CliniMACS Prodigy®.ResultsWe demonstrated consistency in cell composition and functionality of the products manufactured at two different production sites. The T cell purity was >98.5%, a CD4/CD8 ratio between 2.5 and 5.5 and transduction rate between 34% and 61% on day 12 (harvest). Median expansion rate was 53-fold (range, 42–65-fold) with 1.7-3.8×109 CAR T cells at harvest, a sufficient number for the planned dose escalation steps (1×105/kg, 1×106/kg, 1×107/kg BW). Complementary research of some of the products pointed out that the CAR+ cells expressed mainly central memory T-cell phenotype. All tested CAR T cell products were capable to translate into T cell activation upon engagement of CAR target cells, indicated by the increase in pro-inflammatory cytokine release and by the increase in CAR T cell amplification. Notably, there were some interindividual, cell-intrinsic differences at the level of cytokine release and amplification. CAR-mediated T cell activation depended on the level of CAR cognate antigen.DiscussionIn conclusion, the CliniMACS Prodigy® platform is well suited for decentralized POC manufacturing of anti-CD20 CAR T cells and may be likewise applicable for the rapid and automated manufacturing of CAR T cells directed against other targets.Clinical trial registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03893019?cond=Melanoma&term=NCT03893019&rank=1, identifier NCT03893019.

Abstract Hodgkin–Reed–Sternberg cells (HRSCs) in classic Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) frequently lack expression of human leukocyte antigen class I (HLA‐I), considered to hamper activation of cytotoxic T cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Here, we demonstrate HLA‐I expression on HRSCs to be a strong determinant of TME composition whereas expression of HLA‐II was associated with only minor differential gene expression in the TME. In HLA‐I‐positive HL the HRSC content and expression of CCL17/TARC in HRSCs are low, independent of the presence of Epstein–Barr virus in HRSCs. Additionally, HLA‐I‐positive HL shows a high content of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells. However, an increased expression of the inhibitory immune checkpoint LAG3 on CD8+ T cells in close proximity to HRSCs is observed. Suggesting interference with cytotoxic activity, we observed an absence of clonally expanded T cells in the TME. While HLA‐I‐positive HL is not associated with an unfavorable clinical course in our cohorts, they share features with the recently described H2 subtype of HL. Given the major differences in TME composition, immune checkpoint inhibitors may differ in their mechanism of action in HLA‐I‐positive compared to HLA‐I‐negative HL.

Introduction People with HIV-1 (PWH) have worse health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared with the general population. Using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may help reorient the focus of HIV care towards improving HRQoL. This study aims to develop, implement and evaluate the use of PROs in HIV care.Methods and analysis This is a Danish single-centre, multistage mixed-methods study consisting of four substudies (studies I–IV). Study I is a qualitative focus group interview study aiming to identify relevant PRO domains, and barriers and benefits to PRO use. Participants are 5–10 PWH and 5–10 HIV healthcare providers (HCPs). Data are thematically analysed. Results will guide the design of a PRO measure (PROM). Study II is a quantitative study aiming to assess PWH’s willingness and ability to engage with PRO. All PWH are consecutively invited to complete the PROMs before their next consultations. Demographic data are collected at enrolment. Differences between PWH who do/do not complete the PROMs are assessed. Study III is a quantitative before-and-after study aiming to assess the impact of PRO use on HCP awareness. Participants are all who complete the PROMs in Study II. In contrast to study II, HCPs are notified of the PROM results. The number of problems documented by the HCP in patients’ medical records during studies II and III are compared using χ2 tests. Multiple regression models are used to identify factors associated with HCP awareness. Study IV is a qualitative study aiming to explore PWH and HCP experiences of using PROs. Participants are 15–20 PWH and 10–15 HCP. Data are collected from participant observation of PRO consultations and individual interviews. Data are analysed thematically.Ethics and dissemination This study is approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency. Participants will provide written consent prior to participation. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

Abstract Introduction Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common form of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma with increasing prevalence. Although the disease burden associated with DLBCL is high, only limited data on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs of German patients with DLBCL is available. Methods Using a large claims database of the German statutory health insurance with 6.7 million enrollees, we identified patients who were newly diagnosed with DLBCL between 2011 and 2018 (index date). Treatment lines were identified based on a predefined set of medication. HCRU and related costs were collected for the entire post index period and per treatment line. Results A total of 2495 incident DLBCL patients were eligible for the analysis. The average follow-up time after index was 41.7 months. During follow-up, 1991 patients started a first-line treatment, 868 a second-line treatment, and 354 a third-line treatment. Overall, patients spent on average (SD) 5.24 (6.17) days per month in hospital after index. While on anti-cancer treatment, this number increased to nine (10.9) in first-line, 8.7 (13.7) in second-line, and 9.4 (15.8) in third-line treatments. Overall costs per patient per month (PPPM) increased from €421 (875.70) before to €3695 (4652) after index. While on a treatment line, PPPM costs were €17,170 (10,246) in first-line, €13,362 (12,685) in second-line, and €12,112 (16,173) in third-line treatments. Time-unadjusted absolute costs sum up to €59,868 (43,331), €35,870 (37,387), and €28,832 (40,540) during first-line, second-line, and third-line treatments, respectively. The main cost drivers were hospitalizations (71% of total costs) and drug acquisition costs (18% of total costs). Conclusions The financial burden of DLBCL in Germany is high, mainly due to hospitalization and drug costs. Therefore, there is a high medical need for new cost-effective therapeutic options that can lower the disease burden and remain financially viable to support the growing number of patients with this aggressive disease.

UNFOLDER (Unfavorable Young Low-Risk Densification of R-Chemo Regimens) is an international phase-3 trial in patients 18–60 years with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and intermediate prognosis defined by age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) of 0 and bulky disease (≥7.5 cm) or aaIPI of 1. In a 2 × 2 factorial design patients were randomized to 6× R-CHOP-14 or 6× R-CHOP-21 (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prediso[lo]ne) and to consolidation radiotherapy to extralymphatic and bulky disease or observation. Response was assessed according to the standardized response criteria published in 1999, not including F-18 fluordesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET). Primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). A total of 695 of 700 patients were eligible for the intention-to-treat analysis. Totally 467 patients qualified for radiotherapy of whom 305 patients were randomized to receive radiotherapy (R-CHOP-21: 155; R-CHOP-14: 150) and 162 to observation (R-CHOP-21: 81, R-CHOP-14: 81). Two hundred twenty-eight patients not qualifying for radiotherapy were randomized for R-CHOP-14 versus R-CHOP-21. After a median observation of 66 months 3-year EFS was superior in the radiotherapy-arm versus observation-arm (84% versus 68%; P = 0.0012), due to a lower rate of partial responses (PR) (2% versus 11%). PR often triggered additional treatment, mostly radiotherapy. No significant difference was observed in progression-free survival (PFS) (89% versus 81%; P = 0.22) and overall survival (OS) (93% versus 93%; P = 0.51). Comparing R-CHOP-14 and R-CHOP-21 EFS, PFS and OS were not different. Patients randomized to radiotherapy had a superior EFS, largely due to a lower PR rate requiring less additional treatment (NCT00278408, EUDRACT 2005-005218-19).

UNFOLDER (NCT00278408, EUDRACT 2005-005218-19) is a phase-3 trial in patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and intermediate prognosis, including primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL). In a 2 × 2 factorial design, patients were randomized to 6× R-CHOP-14 or R-CHOP-21 (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prediso(lo)ne) and to consolidation radiotherapy to extralymphatic/bulky disease or observation. Response was assessed according to the standardized criteria from 1999, which did not include F-18 fluordesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET) scans. Primary end point was event-free survival (EFS). A subgroup of 131 patients with PMBCLs was included (median age, 34 y; 54% female, 79% elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), 20% LDH >2× upper limit of normal [ULN], and 24% extralymphatic involvement). Eighty-two (R-CHOP-21: 43 and R-CHOP-14: 39) patients were assigned to radiotherapy and 49 (R-CHOP-21: 27, R-CHOP-14: 22) to observation. The 3-year EFS was superior in radiotherapy arm (94% [95% confidence interval (CI), 89-99] versus 78% [95% CI, 66-89]; P = 0.0069), due to a lower rate of partial responses (PRs) (2% versus 10%). PR triggered additional treatment, mostly radiotherapy (n = 5; PR: 4; complete response/unconfirmed complete response: 1). No significant differences were observed in progression-free survival (PFS) (95% [95% CI, 90-100] versus 90% [95% CI, 81-98]; P = 0.25) nor in overall survival (OS) (98% [95% CI, 94-100] versus 96% [95% CI, 90-100]; P = 0.64). Comparing R-CHOP-14 and R-CHOP-21, EFS, PFS, and OS were not different. A prognostic marker for adverse outcome was elevated LDH >2× ULN (EFS: P = 0.016; PFS: P = 0.0049; OS: P = 0.0014). With the limitation of a pre-PET-era trial, the results suggest a benefit of radiotherapy only for patients responding to R-CHOP with PR. PMBCL treated with R-CHOP have a favorable prognosis with a 3-year OS of 97%.

Nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is a Hodgkin lymphoma expressing functional B-cell receptors (BCR). Recently, we described a dual stimulation model of IgD+ lymphocyte-predominant cells by Moraxella catarrhalis antigen RpoC and its superantigen MID/hag, associated with extralong CDR3 and HLA-DRB1*04 or HLADRB1* 07 haplotype. The aim of the present study was to extend the antigen screening to further bacteria and viruses. The fragment antibody-binding (Fab) regions of seven new and 15 previously reported cases were analyzed. The reactivity of non-Moraxella spp.-reactive Fab regions against lysates of Rothia mucilaginosa was observed in 5/22 (22.7%) cases. Galactofuranosyl transferase (Gltf) and 2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase (Bdh) of R. mucilaginosa were identified by comparative silver- and immuno-staining in two-dimensional gels, with subsequent mass spectrometry and validation by western blots and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Both R. mucilaginosa Gltf and Bdh induced BCR pathway activation and proliferation in vitro. Apoptosis was induced by recombinant Gltf/ETA’-immunotoxin conjugates in DEV cells expressing recombinant R. mucilaginosa-reactive BCR. Reactivity against M. catarrhalis RpoC was confirmed in 3/7 newly expressed BCR (total 10/22 reactive to Moraxella spp.), resulting in 15/22 (68.2%) cases with BCR reactivity against defined bacterial antigens. These findings strengthen the hypothesis of bacterial trigger contributing to subsets of NLPHL.

IntroductionThe German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) HD17 trial established the omission of radiotherapy (RT) for patients with early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma being PET-negative after 2 cycles of BEACOPP escalated plus 2 cycles of ABVD. This patient group reveals heterogeneity in characteristics and disease extent which prompted us to perform a decisive dosimetric analysis according to GHSG risk factors. This may help to tailor RT individually balancing risks and benefits.MethodsFor quality assurance, RT-plans were requested from the treating facilities (n= 141) and analyzed centrally. Dose-volume histograms were scanned either paper-based or digitally to obtain doses to mediastinal organs. These were registered and compared according to GHSG risk factors.ResultsOverall, RT plans of 176 patients were requested, 139 of which had dosimetric information on target volumes within the mediastinum. Most of these patients were stage II (92.8%), had no B-symptoms (79.1%) and were aged < 50 years (89.9%). Risk factors were present in 8.6% (extranodal involvement), 31.7% (bulky disease), 46.0% (elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and 64.0% (three involved areas), respectively. The presence of bulky disease significantly affected the mean RT doses to the heart (p=0.005) and to the left lung (median: 11.3 Gy vs. 9.9 Gy; p=0.042) as well as V5 of the right and left lung, respectively (median right lung: 67.4% vs. 51.0%; p=0.011; median left lung: 65.9% vs. 54.2%; p=0.008). Significant differences in similar organs at risk parameters could be found between the sub-cohorts with the presence or absence of extranodal involvement, respectively. In contrast, an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate did not deteriorate dosimetry significantly. No association of any risk factor with radiation doses to the female breast was found.ConclusionPre-chemotherapy risk factors may help to predict potential RT exposure to normal organs and to critically review treatment indication. Individualized risk-benefit evaluations for patients with HL in early-stage unfavorable disease are mandatory.