Search

Continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion (CIPII) is a promising therapy of patients with Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus (IDDM), since it improves metabolic control and decreases frequency of severe hypoglycaemia. This could be due to more appropriate insulin kinetics. Our aim, therefore, was to compare plasma free insulin levels achieved in patients with Type 1 diabetes chronically treated with CSII or CIPII. Furthermore, as anti-insulin antibodies increase with this treatment, we wanted to assess their influence upon insulin kinetics. Plasma free insulin profiles were obtained during the night and then after the bolus for breakfast and the bolus for lunch in 11 patients with Type 1 diabetes treated successively by CSII and CIPII. In another group of 16 patients with long-term Type 1 diabetes, treated by CIPII, we examined the influence of anti-insulin antibody level on insulin kinetics after a bolus. During the night, plasma free insulin levels were lower with CIPII than with CSII (12:00 am: 10.1 +/- 1.7 vs 18.5 +/- 2.6 mU l-1; 4:00 am: 9.1 +/- 2 vs 15 +/- 3 mU l-1), p < 0.01. After the bolus, CIPII lead to an earlier (1h vs 3h) and higher (25.8 +/- 3.3 vs 18 +/- 2.7, p < 0.05) plasma free insulin peak than CSII. With CIPII, the return to baseline level was observed within 3 h. Conversely, during CSII, insulin levels did not return to baseline until the next meal. After the bolus, high insulin-antibody levels were associated with a reduced maximal value of plasma free insulin peak. Taken together, these findings suggest that CIPII provides plasma free insulin profiles which are much closer to physiology than CSII. This could explain the lower rate of severe hypoglycaemia observed with this type of treatment. But in long-term CIPII treated patients with high anti-insulin antibody level, insulin profile could be moderately modified. This emphasizes the need for a less immunogenic insulin preparation.

AIM: The purpose of this national multicenter prospective study by the French EVADIAC group was to investigate the possibility that continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion using an implanted pump (CIpii) increases the risk of autoimmune disease in type 1 diabetic patients as it increased anti-insulin immunogenicity.METHODS: Prevalence of clinical (Hashimoto's disease, hyperthyroidism, gastric atrophic disease and vitiligo) and subclinical (presence of anti-thyroperoxidase antibodies, anti-intrinsic factor antibodies, abnormal TSH levels) autoimmune diseases was estimated by comparing two groups of patients already treated by either CIpii (n=154) or external pump (CSII) (n=121) for an average of 6 years. Incidence of autoimmune disease was determined by comparing the same measurements one year after inclusion.RESULTS: No significant difference was observed for the total prevalence of clinical and subclinical auto-immune thyroid and gastric di-seases (35.6% and 3.2% respectively in the CIpii group versus 40.4% and 2.6% in the CSII group). No significant difference for the incidence of clinical and subclinical auto-immune diseases was observed: 7.2% and 0% in CIpii and 7.3% and 1.7% in CSII.CONCLUSION: As previously shown AIA (anti-insulin antibodies) levels were higher in CIpii than in CSII (32.9% vs 20.2%, P

OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy of the short-acting insulin analog lispro (LP) with that of regular insulin in IDDM patients treated with an external pump. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Thirty-nine IDDM patients (age, 39.4 ± 1.5 years; sex ratio, 22M/17W; BMI, 24.4 ± 0.4 kg/m2; diabetes duration, 22.5 ± 1.6 years) who were treated by external pump for 5.1 ± 0.5 years were involved in an open-label, randomized, crossover multicenter study comparing two periods of 3 months of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with LP or with Actrapid HM, U-100 (ACT). Boluses were given 0–5 min (LP) or 20–30 min (ACT) before meals. Blood glucose (BG) was monitored before and after the three meals every day. RESULTS The decrease in HbA1c was more pronounced with LP than with ACT (−0.62 ± 0.13 vs. −0.09 ± 0.15%, P = 0.01). BG levels were lower with LP (7.93 ± 0.15 vs. 8.61 ± 0.18 mmol/l, P < 0.0001), particularly postprandial BG levels (8.26 ± 0.19 vs. 9.90 ± 0.20 mmol/l, P < 0.0001). Standard deviations of all the BG values (3.44 ± 0.10 vs. 3.80 ± 0.10 mmol/l, P = 0.0001) and of postprandial BG values (3.58 ± 0.10 vs. 3.84 ± 0.10 mmol/l. P < 0.02) were lower with LP. The rate of hypoglycemic events defined by BG < 3.0 mmol/l did not significantly differ between LP and ACT (7.03 ± 0.94 vs. 7.94 ± 0.88 per month, respectively), but the rate of occurrences of very low BG, defined as BG < 2.0 mmol/l, were significantly reduced with LP (0.05 ± 0.05 vs. 0.47 ± 0.19 per month, P < 0.05). At the end of the study, all but two (95%) of the patients chose LP for the extension phase. CONCLUSIONS When used in external pumps, LP provides better glycemic control and stability than regular insulin and does not increase the frequency of hypoglycemic episodes.

Continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion (CIPII) is a promising therapy of patients with Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus (IDDM), since it improves metabolic control and decreases frequency of severe hypoglycaemia. This could be due to more appropriate insulin kinetics. Our aim, therefore, was to compare plasma free insulin levels achieved in patients with Type 1 diabetes chronically treated with CSII or CIPII. Furthermore, as anti-insulin antibodies increase with this treatment, we wanted to assess their influence upon insulin kinetics. Plasma free insulin profiles were obtained during the night and then after the bolus for breakfast and the bolus for lunch in 11 patients with Type 1 diabetes treated successively by CSII and CIPII. In another group of 16 patients with long-term Type 1 diabetes, treated by CIPII, we examined the influence of anti-insulin antibody level on insulin kinetics after a bolus. During the night, plasma free insulin levels were lower with CIPII than with CSII (12:00 am: 10.1 +/- 1.7 vs 18.5 +/- 2.6 mU l-1; 4:00 am: 9.1 +/- 2 vs 15 +/- 3 mU l-1), p0.01. After the bolus, CIPII lead to an earlier (1h vs 3h) and higher (25.8 +/- 3.3 vs 18 +/- 2.7, p0.05) plasma free insulin peak than CSII. With CIPII, the return to baseline level was observed within 3 h. Conversely, during CSII, insulin levels did not return to baseline until the next meal. After the bolus, high insulin-antibody levels were associated with a reduced maximal value of plasma free insulin peak. Taken together, these findings suggest that CIPII provides plasma free insulin profiles which are much closer to physiology than CSII. This could explain the lower rate of severe hypoglycaemia observed with this type of treatment. But in long-term CIPII treated patients with high anti-insulin antibody level, insulin profile could be moderately modified. This emphasizes the need for a less immunogenic insulin preparation.

Advantages and drawbacks of the treatment of insulin-dependent diabetes by intra-peritoneal administration of insulin through an implanted infusion system are presented. This review is based upon our personal studies and the french experience centralized by the EVADIAC group. Between 1989 and 1994, 312 insulin-dependent patients were implanted in France. The mean followed up was 36 +/- 1 months, allowing an experience of 660 patients years. The main benefit is an important reduction in the incidence of severe hypoglycemia falling down from 15 per cent patient years before implantation to 2.5 per cent after. Although the patients were previously treated by intensive insulin treatment and well controlled, mean glycated hemoglobin was slightly improved and the glycemic stability increased as evidenced by the reduction of standard deviation of glycemia. Life duration of the implanted system averaged 38 months excepted for incidents requiring an explantation. Although the frequency of incidents was non negligible, they were acceptable. Vigilance, as performed by EVADIAC group is still necessary. This point can be illustrated by a technical problem which appeared recently and was due to a poor compatibility between a new preparation of insulin and the ejection chamber of the pump. Intraperitoneal administration of insulin allows to obtain plasma insulin concentration through the day closer to the physiology than that obtained with subcutaneous insulin infusion. Blood levels of some proteins, mainly SHBG and IGF1, return to normal values. However, this mode of administration is associated in some cases with an important increase of the insulin antibody levels, increase which does not seem to have a deleterious metabolic effect, but has to be carefully evaluated on the long term.

Introduction Nous avons cree 2 outils : un imagier pour faciliter le dialogue sur le vecu du port de la pompe a insuline et une fiche de synthese pour recueillir les echanges. Materiels et methodes La faisabilite de l’utilisation de ces outils a ete testee par 8 soignants volontaires et des infirmiers prestataires dans 3 circonstances : suivi, bilan annuel, refus de la pompe. Un questionnaire (faisabilite et satisfaction) patient et soignant, a ete rempli chaque fois. 67 reponses patients completes ont ete analysees sur un test de 3 mois. Resultats Ces outils ont ete utilises en consultation (40 %), en hospitalisation (33 %) et a domicile (27 %) a l’occasion d’une mise sous pompe (58 %), d’un suivi (21 %), ou d’un refus de la pompe (21 %). 90 % des patients etaient diabetiques de type 1 (HbA1c a 8.1 %), d’âge moyen 42 ans, sans complication (60 %), avec une duree moyenne du diabete : 18 ans. L’imagier est simple d’utilisation pour les soignants (87 %) et les patients (64 %), il facilite le dialogue entre soignants (89 %) et patients (82 %). 49 % des soignants ont aborde de nouveaux sujets avec le patient et seulement 34 % des patients le pensent. Les principales thematiques abordees sont la vie intime (rapports sexuels) 16 % ; l’education (apprentissage, technologie) : 12 % ; les difficultes psychologiques (solitude, confiance, culpabilite) : 6 %. 92 % des soignants trouvent l’usage de cet imagier interessant pour leur pratique. La duree moyenne d’echange autour des images est de 12 minutes, en moyenne 3 images (sur 18) sont choisies par le patient. Pour la fiche de synthese, 98 % des soignants l’ont trouvee simple, interessante pour leur pratique (94 %). Conclusion L’imagier apparait simple, rapide d’utilisation, il facilite les echanges, peut permettre d’aborder de nouveaux sujets avec les patients. Les soignants « testeurs » souhaitent en disposer en routine.