Search

Study Design: Retrospective analysis of a prospective multicenter Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) registry., Objective: Assess whether spinal alignment deteriorates post-surgery in absence of mechanical complications and evaluate the long-term outcomes of ASD surgery over a five-year period., Summary of Background Data: ASD is prevalent among older adults, leading to significant pain and disability. Surgical intervention, although increasingly popular, is associated with complications, high costs, and uncertain long-term outcomes beyond two years. Mechanical failure and alignment loss often necessitate revision surgeries, but the natural progression of spinal alignment post-surgery without complications remains unclear., Methods: Clinical and radiological data were analyzed from surgical patients in a multicenter ASD registry who maintained alignment within the instrumented region and completed a 5-year follow-up. The study evaluated patient demographics, surgical details, radiological parameters, and quality of life (QoL) outcomes. Sub-analyses were conducted to compare patients with different initial postoperative alignments and fixation levels., Results: The study included 79 patients (83.5% women, average age 61.9 years) with a mean of 10.7 fused levels. Of these, 29.1% underwent three-column osteotomies (3CO), and 88.6% had a posterior-only approach. While 65% showed favorable alignment at 6 weeks post-surgery, there was a progressive deterioration in global sagittal alignment (Global Tilt/RSA) and thoracic kyphosis over five years (P<0.05), along with increased pelvic compensation (PT SS/RPV). These changes did not correlate with worsening Health-Related Quality of Life outcomes (P>0.05). Older age was linked to greater progression in T2-T12 kyphosis, and osteoporosis was associated with increased SVA and RPV. Optimal immediate postoperative sagittal alignment did not prevent this "aging effect.", Conclusions: ASD surgery and achieving ideal postoperative alignment do not prevent the ongoing "aging" of the non-instrumented spine. Both thoracic and global sagittal alignments deteriorate over time. Although no functional decline has been observed, the implications of these changes for surgical planning remain uncertain., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interests: The European Spine Study Group receives funding support from DePuy Synthes and Medtronic., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) are two commonly used self-rating outcome instruments in patients with lumbar spinal disorders. No formal crosswalk between them exists that would otherwise allow the scores of one to be interpreted in terms of the other. We aimed to create such a mapping function., Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of ODI and COMI data previously collected from 3324 patients (57 ± 17y; 60.3% female) at baseline and 1y after surgical or conservative treatment. Correlations between scores and Cohen's kappa for agreement (κ) regarding achievement of the minimal clinically important change (MCIC) score on each instrument (ODI, 12.8 points; COMI, 2.2 points) were calculated, and regression models were built. The latter were tested for accuracy in an independent set of registry data from 634 patients (60 ± 15y; 56.8% female)., Results: All pairs of measures were significantly positively correlated (baseline, 0.73; 1y follow-up (FU), 0.84; change-scores, 0.73). MCIC for COMI was achieved in 53.9% patients and for ODI, in 52.4%, with 78% agreement on an individual basis (κ = 0.56). Standard errors for the regression slopes and intercepts were low, indicating excellent prediction at the group level, but root mean square residuals (reflecting individual error) were relatively high. ODI was predicted as COMI × 7.13-4.20 (at baseline), COMI × 6.34 + 2.67 (at FU) and COMI × 5.18 + 1.92 (for change-score); COMI was predicted as ODI × 0.075 + 3.64 (baseline), ODI × 0.113 + 0.96 (FU), and ODI × 0.102 + 1.10 (change-score). ICCs were 0.63-0.87 for derived versus actual scores., Conclusion: Predictions at the group level were very good and met standards justifying the pooling of data. However, we caution against using individual values for treatment decisions, e.g. attempting to monitor patients over time, first with one instrument and then with the other, due to the lower statistical precision at the individual level. The ability to convert scores via the developed mapping function should open up more centres/registries for collaboration and facilitate the combining of data in meta-analyses., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: A normal sagittal vertical axis (SVA) after spinal deformity correction can yield mechanical complications of up to 30%. Post-operative compensatory pelvic orientation can produce a normal SVA. We assess relative pelvic version (RPV), an individualised measure, for persistent post-operative compensatory measures., Methods: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients who were treated operatively, with a normal SVA (< ± 50 mm) at 6-week follow-up were included, who were then followed-up after 2 years. These only included patients with fusion of > 4 vertebrae extending to L5 or below. Six-week subgroups were made regarding pelvis orientation, relative pelvic version (RPV: anteversion, aligned, moderate or severe retroversion) with analysis of patient-related outcome measures (PROMs), complications and spino-pelvic sagittal parameters., Results: At 6 weeks, 140 patients met the inclusion criteria, 5 (3.6%) patients had anteversion, 59 (42.1%) were aligned, 60 (42.9%) had moderate retroversion and 16 (11.4%) patients had severe retroversion. Follow-up after 2 years demonstrated increased RPV in all groups except the severe RPV group who were more likely to develop SVA > 50 mm. Complications occurred in all groups. Significant 2-year differences were observed between moderate and severe RPV for back pain and PROMs but not between other RPV groups., Conclusion: Adult spinal deformity patients with a normal SVA after spino-pelvic instrumentation carry a significant risk of retroversion progression post-operatively, followed by increased positive sagittal balance. Relative pelvic version (RPV) measurements when categorised into anteversion, aligned, moderate retroversion and severe retroversion at 6 weeks were predictive of PROMs at 2 years., (© 2021. Scoliosis Research Society.)

Introduction: Previous studies suggest that a meaningful and easily understood measure of treatment outcome may be the proportion of patients who are in a "patient acceptable symptom state" (PASS). We sought to quantify the score equivalent to PASS for different outcome instruments, in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD)., Methods: We analysed the following 12-month questionnaire data from the European Spine Study Group (ESSG): Oswestry Disability Index (ODI; 0-100); Numeric Rating Scales (NRS; 0-10) for back/leg pain; Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) questionnaire; and an item "if you had to spend the rest of your life with the symptoms you have now, how would you feel about it?" (5-point scale, dichotomised with top 2 responses "somewhat satisfied/very satisfied" being considered PASS+, everything else PASS-). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses indicated the cut-off scores equivalent to PASS+., Results: Out of 1043 patients (599 operative, 444 non-operative; 51 ± 19 years; 84% women), 42% reported being PASS+ at 12 months' follow-up. The ROC areas under the curve were 0.71-0.84 (highest for SRS subscore), suggesting the questionnaire scores discriminated well between PASS+ and PASS-. The scores corresponding to PASS+ were > 3.5 for the SRS subscore (> 3.3-3.8 for SRS subdomains); ≤ 18 for ODI; and ≤ 3 for NRS pain. There were slight differences in cut-offs for subgroups of age, treatment type, aetiology, baseline symptoms, and sex., Conclusion: Most interventions for ASD improve patients' complaints but do not totally eliminate them. Reporting the percentage achieving a score equivalent to an "acceptable state" may represent a more stringent and discerning target for denoting treatment success in ASD. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Study Design: Retrospective study of prospectively collected data., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between apical vertebral axial rotation and pretreatment patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL), disability, and pain in patients with adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) using a novel radiographic software tool., Summary of Background Data: Recent studies have demonstrated that in ADS, sagittal and coronal plane deformity are weakly to moderately associated with HRQOL, disability, and pain. However, as ADS is a three-dimensional spinal deformity, the impact of axial malalignment on HRQOL is yet to be determined., Methods: A total of 74 ADS patients were enrolled. HRQOL measures included the Short Form-36v2 (SF-36v2) and Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire (SRS-22r). Disability and pain measures included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and numeric rating scale back and leg pain. Radiographic measures included Cobb angle (CA), sagittal spinopelvic parameters, lateral and anteroposterior (AP) translation of the apical vertebra. The amount of apical vertebral axial rotation was measured on digital AP radiograph images using a novel software technology. Subjects were stratified into four clinical groups based on the degree of apical vertebral axial rotation., Results: Apical vertebral axial rotation showed no association with lateral (r = 0.21; p = .15) and AP (r = 0.08, p = .80) translation of the apical vertebra. A significant moderate association was found between apical vertebral axial rotation and Cobb angle (r = 0.57; p < .05). Patients in the group with the highest degree of apical vertebral axial rotation reported significantly worse ODI and SRS-22r Subtotal and Pain scores (p < .05), irrespective of sagittal spinopelvic parameters., Conclusions: This is the first study that reports on the association between apical vertebral axial rotation and pretreatment HRQOL, disability, and pain in ADS. This study suggests that increased apical vertebral axial rotation is associated with suboptimal pretreatment health status scores., Level of Evidence: Level III., (Copyright © 2018 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Multicenter, prospective study of consecutive adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients., Objective: To evaluate back and leg pain as a combined score in ASD and compare their relative and cumulative correlations with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and sagittal parameters., Summary of Background Data: Pain and disability are commonly reported in patients with ASD. This can affect their back, their legs or both. ASD-associated pain has been correlated with numerous HRQOL scores and radiological parameters., Methods: Preoperative pain intensity was assessed with a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for individual back and leg pain as well as a combined score, NRS20 (0-20, back plus leg pain).This yielded a range of static measures in all patients with ASD with differing burdens of disease. Linear regression analysis was performed to calculate the correlation between pain and HRQOL scores (Scoliosis Research Society 22, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Mental Component Summary, Core Outcome Measures Index, and Oswestry Disability Index), and radiological spinopelvic parameters (sagittal and coronal planes)., Results: A total of 1309 patients were included in this study. A combined score (NRS20) was better correlated with HRQOL (P < 0.01 for all) and sagittal parameters (P < 0.01 for all) than individual back or leg pain scores. Evaluation of the relative contributions of back and leg pain demonstrate a higher correlation with HRQOL scores for back pain and a higher correlation with sagittal parameters for leg pain. The distribution of NRS20 pain scores demonstrated three clear patterns of pain: back pain only, moderate back pain with varying mild-moderate leg pain, and severe equivalent back and leg pain. Similar values were noted for nonoperative and operative patients., Conclusion: The distribution and intensity of pain and its correlations with clinical and radiological parameters provide insight into the pathogenesis of ASD. A combined score has a simple yet valuable contribution to the assessment of symptoms in ASD., Level of Evidence: 3.

OBJECTIVE Previous studies have demonstrated that among patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD), sagittal plane malalignment is poorly tolerated and correlates with suboptimal patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL). These studies included a broad range of radiographic abnormalities and various types of ASD. However, the clinical and radiographic characteristics of de novo degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DNDLS), a subtype of ASD, may influence previously reported correlation strengths. The aim of this study was to correlate sagittal radiographic parameters with pretreatment HRQOL in patients with symptomatic DNDLS. METHODS In this multicenter retrospective study of prospectively collected data, 74 patients with symptomatic DNDLS were enrolled based on anteroposterior and lateral 36-inch standing radiographs. Measurements included Cobb angle, coronal imbalance, pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic kyphosis, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), T1-pelvic angle, and global tilt. HRQOL questionnaires included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22r), 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, and numeric rating scale (NRS) for back and leg pain. Correlations between radiographic parameters and HRQOL were assessed. Finally, HRQOL and increasing severity of sagittal modifiers (SVA, PI-LL, and PT) were evaluated. RESULTS Weak correlations were found between SVA and ODI (r = 0.296, p < 0.05) and PT with NRS back pain and the SRS pain domain (r = -0.260, p < 0.05, and r = 0.282, p < 0.05, respectively). Other sagittal radiographic parameters did not show any significant correlation with HRQOL. No significant differences in HRQOL were found concerning the increasing severity of PT, PI-LL, and SVA. CONCLUSIONS While DNDLS is a severe disabling condition, no noteworthy association between clinical and sagittal radiographic parameters was found through this study, demonstrating that sagittal radiographic parameters should not be considered the unique predictor of pretreatment suboptimal health status in this specific group of patients. Future studies addressing classification and treatment algorithms will have to take into account the existing subgroups of ASD.

Purpose: Designed for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, the SRS-22 is now widely used as an outcome instrument in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). No studies have confirmed the four-factor structure (pain, function, self-image, mental health) of the SRS-22 in ASD and under different contexts. Factorial invariance of an instrument over time and in different languages is essential to allow for precise interpretations of treatment success and comparisons across studies. This study sought to evaluate the invariance of the SRS-22 structure across different languages and sub-groups of ASD patients., Methods: Confirmatory factor analysis was performed on the 20 non-management items of the SRS-22 with data from 245 American English-, 428 Spanish-, 229 Turkish-, 95 French-, and 195 German-speaking patients. Item loading invariance was compared across languages, age groups, etiologies, treatment groups, and assessment times. A separate sample of SRS-22 data from 772 American surgical patients with ASD was used for cross-validation., Results: The factor structure fitted significantly better to the proposed four-factor solution than to a unifactorial solution. However, items 14 (personal relationships), 15 (financial difficulties), and 17 (days off work) consistently showed weak item loading within their factors across all language versions and in both baseline and follow-up datasets. A trimmed SRS (16 non-management items) that used the four least problematic items in each of the four domains yielded better-fitting models across all languages, but equivalence was still not reached. With this shorter version there was equivalence of item loading with respect to treatment (surgery vs conservative), time of assessment (baseline vs 12 months follow-up), and etiology (degenerative vs idiopathic), but not age (< vs ≥50 years). All findings were confirmed in the cross-validation sample., Conclusion: We recommend removal of the worst-fitting items from each of the four domains of the SRS-instrument (items 3, 14, 15, 17), together with adaptation and standardization of other items across language versions, to provide an improved version of the instrument with just 16 non-management items.

Introduction: The Core Outcome Measures Index for the back (COMI-back) is a very brief instrument for assessing the main outcomes of importance to patients with back problems (pain, function, symptom-specific well-being, quality of life, disability). However, it might be expected to be less responsive than a disease-specific instrument when evaluating specific pathologies. In patients with adult spinal deformity, we compared the performance of COMI-back with the widely accepted SRS-22 questionnaire., Methods: At baseline and 12 months after non-operative (N = 121) and surgical (N = 83) treatment, patients (175 F, 29 M) completed the following: COMI-back, SRS-22, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and SF-36 PCS. At 12 months' follow-up, patients also indicated on a 15-point Global Rating of Change Scale (GRCS) how their back problem had changed relative to 1 year ago. Construct validity for the COMI-back was assessed by the correlation between its scores and those of the comparator instruments; responsiveness was assessed with receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis of COMI-back change scores versus the criterion 'treatment success' (dichotomized GRCS)., Results: Baseline values for the COMI-back showed significant (p < 0.0001) correlations with SRS-22 (r = -0.85), ODI (r = 0.83), and SF-36 PCS (r = -0.82) scores; significantly worse scores for all measures were recorded in the surgical group. The correlation between the change scores (baseline to 12 months) for COMI and SRS-22 was 0.74, and between each of these change scores and the external criterion of treatment success were: COMI-back, r = 0.58; SRS-22, r = -0.58 (each p < 0.0001). The ROC areas under the curve for the COMI-back and SRS-22 change scores were 0.79 and 0.82, respectively., Conclusion: Both baseline and change scores for the COMI-back correlated strongly with those of the SRS-22, and differed significantly in surgical and non-operative patients, suggesting good construct validity. With the "change in the back problem" serving as external criterion, COMI-back showed similar external responsiveness to SRS-22. The COMI-back was well able to detect important change. Coupled with its brevity, which minimizes patient burden, these favourable psychometric properties suggest the COMI-back is a suitable instrument for use in registries and can serve as a valid instrument in clinical studies emerging from such data pools.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze and demonstrate the heterogeneity in adult spinal deformity (ASD) populations by baseline health-related quality of life (HRQL) data., Methods: ASD was defined as patients over 18 years of age with any of the following: coronal deformity >20°, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) >5 cm, pelvic tilt >25°, or thoracic kyphosis >60°. Three hundred fifty-two patients meeting the above definition of ASD were analyzed for measures of HRQL (Oswestry disability index [ODI], SRS-22 [Scoliosis Research Society-22], and SF-36 [Short form-36 health survey] questionnaires) at presentation. Age groups were defined as 18-40, 40-60, and >60 years. Deformity was analyzed as either degenerative (DS) or idiopathic (IS) (294 patients; 71 degenerative, 223 idiopathic)., Results: There were significant differences between age groups--predominantly between the lower age group (18-40) and others--for all HRQL parameters except SRS-22 mental health and SF-36 mental component score. Similarly, HRQL measures for DS and IS deformities were significantly different. Regarding location of main curves, thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) (70.2%) was dominant for the DS group and thoracic (55%) for the IS group. Mean age was 65 years for the DS group and 36 for the IS group, which were significantly different. Radiographic parameters were also significantly different between these groups, with IS patients having more coronal deformity and better sagittal balance., Conclusion: ASD patients are very heterogeneous at presentation, depending on age and diagnosis. There is a distinct need to stratify ASD as early and late presentation ASD and/or by diagnosis. Patients with IS deformity may be very different from those with DS deformity, even at time of presentation. These differences must be taken into consideration in treatment of these patients, as well as for the analysis of the results of treatment.

Thoracic hyperkyphosis is a sagittal deformity that can cause back pain and neurological impairment, leading to difficulties in maintaining a straight gaze. Sagittal thoracic malalignment has different etiologies and different corrective strategies. An adequate preoperative planning is mandatory to address correctly the surgical treatment, using an appropriate sagittal deformities classification and the rules that relate pelvic parameters to spine curvatures to determine the correction needed to restore a good sagittal alignment. Ponte osteotomies are performed in long non-angular hyperkyphotic thoracic deformities, even if idiopathic scoliosis, rigid deformities or proximal junctional kyphosis after instrumented fusions can benefit from the application of this technique that requires a mobile anterior column for the correction of the deformity. Ponte's is, together with Smith-Petersen osteotomy, a posterior column osteotomy. The magnitude of correction can reach 10° per level if intervertebral discs are still mobile.

Background/aim: Neither cervicotomy nor postero-lateral thoracotomy allow safe surgical access to the lower cervical spine and high posterior mediastinum with full control of the vascular and neural structures involved. We report our favorable experience with cervico-sternotomy for accessing this region., Patients and Methods: Six patients were operated upon between 1998 and 2011 for either removal of huge cervico-thoracic neural ganglioneuromas (n = 2) or anterior arthrodesis for congenital (n = 2), neuropathic (n = 1) or osteolytic scoliosis (n = 1). In all cases, cervicotomy was followed by sternotomy, thymectomy, division of the innominate vein and dissection of jugular veins, carotid arteries and vagus nerves., Results: The tumors measured 10.9 x 3.9 x 8.7 cm and 8 x 6 x 5 cm, and involved the paravertebral chain from the aortic arch to the base of the skull and from the left lung hilus to the thyroid region respectively. In the scoliosis patients, anterior vertebral fixation between C5 and T5 was readily feasible. Blood transfusion was avoided. Horner's syndrome and transient lymphedema were the only complications. Median operative time was 210 minutes (range 180-240 minutes) and median estimated blood loss was 2.7 cc/kg (0-13.8 cc/kg). Median hospital stay was 7 days (range 5-18 days)., Conclusions: Cervico-sternotomy is an optimal approach for this anatomical region in children. It offers better exposure of the anterior cervico-thoracic spine and the thoracic inlet than cervicotomy or thoracotomy. Control of the nervous and vascular structures was safely achieved in all cases and postoperative discomfort was surprisingly limited.

Background/aim: Surgery for neural tumors occasionally involves opening of the neural canal and/or costovertebral resection that may be followed by radiotherapy. Spinal deformities (SD) may occur in these cases. This study investigated the incidence, surgical indications and results of repair of late SD in a large series of patients with neural tumors., Methods: A retrospective review of neural tumors treated between 1991 and 2009 at our institution identified children with SD who subsequently required spinal surgery. SD was meaÂ-sured using Cobb's angle. Instrumentation of the spine was indicated in patients with a Cobb's angle of more than 60° or rapidly progressing SD. The operation was adapted to the location, type and degree of SD. Patients were followed up and the remaining deviations were measured annually., Results: Out of a series of 188 patients with neural tumors, 5 of 173 patients with neuroblastomas/ganglioneuromas (NB/GN) and 3 of 15 patients with PNET/Askin tumors developed SD over time. NB/GN children had intraspinal tumors requiring laminotomy (n=3) or laminectomy (n=2). PNET/Askin tumor patients had undergone largescale rib and partial vertebral body resection and radiotherapy. Scoliosis or kyphosis were located in the thoracic spine in 4, in the thoracolumbar spine in 3 and in the cervicothoracic spine in 1. The median preoperative Cobb's angle was 65° (50°-90°) prior to spinal surgery performed 2.9 (0.4-11) years after tumor removal. 3 growth bars, 2 vertical expandable prosthetic titanium ribs, 1 pediatric ISOLA device and anterior instrumentation were used. Arthrodesis was necessary in 3 patients. Median post-instrumentation deformity after 3.1 (0.2-12.2) years was 40° (20°-50°), giving an improvement of 38.4%., Conclusions: With increasing numbers of children surviving cancer, attention must focus on sequelae. A sizeable number of survivors of NB/GN and PNET/Askin tumors develop serious SD requiring surgical correction. Pediatric surgeons, patients and relatives must be aware of these possible sequelae., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)