Search

A substantial part of living cells activity involves transcription regulation. The RNA polymerases responsible for this job need to know ‘where/when' to start and stop in the genome, answers that may change throughout life and upon external stimuli. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, RNA Pol II transcription termination can follow two different routes: the poly(A)-dependent one used for most of the mRNAs and the Nrd1/Nab3/Sen1 (NNS) pathway for non-coding RNAs (ncRNA). The NNS targets include snoRNAs and cryptic unstable transcripts (CUTs) generated by pervasive transcription. This review recapitulates the state of the art in structural biology and biophysics of the Nrd1, Nab3 and Sen1 components of the NNS complex, with special attention to their domain structures and interactions with peptide and RNA motifs, and their heterodimerization. This structural information is put into the context of the NNS termination mechanism together with possible prospects for evolution in the field.

Heterodimerization of RNA binding proteins Nrd1 and Nab3 is essential to communicate the RNA recognition in the nascent transcript with the Nrd1 recognition of the Ser5-phosphorylated Rbp1 C-terminal domain in RNA polymerase II. The structure of a Nrd1-Nab3 chimera reveals the basis of heterodimerization, filling a missing gap in knowledge of this system. The free form of the Nrd1 interaction domain of Nab3 (NRID) forms a multi-state three-helix bundle that is clamped in a single conformation upon complex formation with the Nab3 interaction domain of Nrd1 (NAID). The latter domain forms two long helices that wrap around NRID, resulting in an extensive protein-protein interface that would explain the highly favorable free energy of heterodimerization. Mutagenesis of some conserved hydrophobic residues involved in the heterodimerization leads to temperature-sensitive phenotypes, revealing the importance of this interaction in yeast cell fitness. The Nrd1-Nab3 structure resembles the previously reported Rna14/Rna15 heterodimer structure, which is part of the poly(A)-dependent termination pathway, suggesting that both machineries use similar structural solutions despite they share little sequence homology and are potentially evolutionary divergent.

Gemin5 is a multifaceted RNA-binding protein that comprises distinct structural domains, including a WD40 and TPR-like for which the X-ray structure is known. In addition, the protein contains a non-canonical RNA-binding domain (RBS1) towards the C-terminus. To understand the RNA binding features of the RBS1 domain, we have characterized its structural characteristics by solution NMR linked to RNA-binding activity. Here we show that a short version of the RBS1 domain that retains the ability to interact with RNA is predominantly unfolded even in the presence of RNA. Furthermore, an exhaustive mutational analysis indicates the presence of an evolutionarily conserved motif enriched in R, S, W, and H residues, necessary to promote RNA-binding via ¿-¿ interactions. The combined results of NMR and RNA-binding on wild-type and mutant proteins highlight the importance of aromatic and arginine residues for RNA recognition by RBS1, revealing that the net charge and the ¿-amino acid density of this region of Gemin5 are key factors for RNA recognition

o investigate the structural impact of phosphory-lation on the human histone H1.0 C-terminal domain,weperformed NMR structural studies of model peptides con-taining asingle phosphorylation site:T118-H1.0 (T118PKKmotif) andT140-H1.0 (T140PVK motif). Both model peptides aremainly disordered in aqueous solution in their non-phos-phorylated and phosphorylated forms, but become struc-tured in the presence of trifluoroethanol. The peptides T118-H1.0 and pT118-H1.0 contain two helical regions, along am-phipathic a helix spanning residues 104–115 and ashort a/310helix (residues 119–123),that are almostperpendicular inT118-H1.0 but have apoorly defined orientation in pT118-H1.0.Peptides T140-H1.0 and pT140-H1.0 form very similar a helicesbetween residues 141–147. The TPKK and TPVK motifs showthe same backbone conformation,but differ in their side-chain contacts;the Thr and pThr side chains interact withthe i + 2Lys side chain in the TPKK motif, andwith the i+ 3Lysside chain in the TPVK motif. The pT phosphate group inpT118-H1.0andpT140-H1.0haspKavaluesbelowtheintrinsicvalues, which can be explained by non-specific charge–chargeinteractions with nearbyLys. The non-polar ValintheTPVK motif accounts forthe pT140pKabeing closer to the in-trinsic pKavalue than the pT118pKa.Altogether,these resultsvalidate that minimalist strategies using model peptides canprovide structural details difficult to obtain in short-lived in-trinsically disordered proteins and domains.

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) participate in all steps of gene expression, underscoring their potential as regulators of RNA homeostasis. We structurally and functionally characterize Mip6, a four-RNA recognition motif (RRM)-containing RBP, as a functional and physical interactor of the export factor Mex67. Mip6-RRM4 directly interacts with the ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain of Mex67 through a loop containing tryptophan 442. Mip6 shuttles between the nucleus and the cytoplasm in a Mex67-dependent manner and concentrates in cytoplasmic foci under stress. Photoactivatable ribonucleoside-enhanced crosslinking and immunoprecipitation experiments show preferential binding of Mip6 to mRNAs regulated by the stress-response Msn2/4 transcription factors. Consistent with this binding, MIP6 deletion affects their export and expression levels. Additionally, Mip6 interacts physically and/or functionally with proteins with a role in mRNA metabolism and transcription such as Rrp6, Xrn1, Sgf73, and Rpb1. These results reveal a novel role for Mip6 in the homeostasis of Msn2/4-dependent transcripts through its direct interaction with the Mex67 UBA domain.

Metazoan SR and SR-like proteins are important regulatory factors in RNA splicing, export, translation and RNA decay. We determined the NMR structures and nucleic acid interaction modes of Gbp2 and Hrb1, two paralogous budding yeast proteins with similarities to mammalian SR proteins. Gbp2 RRM1 and RRM2 recognise preferentially RNAs containing the core motif GGUG. Sequence selectivity resides in a non-canonical interface in RRM2 that is highly related to the SRSF1 pseudoRRM. The atypical Gbp2/Hrb1 C-terminal RRM domains (RRM3) do not interact with RNA/DNA, likely because of their novel N-terminal extensions that block the canonical RNA binding interface. Instead, we discovered that RRM3 is crucial for interaction with the THO/TREX complex and identified key residues essential for this interaction. Moreover, Gbp2 interacts genetically with Tho2 as the double deletion shows a synthetic phenotype and preventing Gbp2 interaction with the THO/TREX complex partly supresses gene expression defect associated with inactivation of the latter complex. These findings provide structural and functional insights into the contribution of SR-like proteins in the post-transcriptional control of gene expression.

Pub1p, a highly abundant poly(A)+ mRNA binding protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, influences the stability and translational control of many cellular transcripts, particularly under some types of environmental stresses. We have studied the structure, RNA and protein recognition modes of different Pub1p constructs by NMR spectroscopy. The structure of the C-terminal RRM domain (RRM3) shows a non-canonical N-terminal helix that packs against the canonical RRM fold in an original fashion. This structural trait is conserved in Pub1p metazoan homologues, the TIA-1 family, defining a new class of RRM-type domains that we propose to name TRRM (TIA-1 C-terminal domain-like RRM). Pub1p TRRM and the N-terminal RRM1-RRM2 tandem bind RNA with high selectivity for U-rich sequences, with TRRM showing additional preference for UArich ones. RNA-mediated chemical shift changes map to b-sheet and protein loops in the three RRMs. Additionally, NMR titration and biochemical in vitro cross-linking experiments determined that Pub1p TRRM interacts specifically with the Nterminal region (1–402) of yeast eIF4G1 (Tif4631p), very likely through the conserved Box1, a short sequence motif neighbouring the Pab1p binding site in Tif4631p. The interaction involves conserved residues of Pub1p TRRM, which define a protein interface that mirrors the Pab1p-Tif4631p binding mode. Neither protein nor RNA recognition involves the novel N-terminal helix, whose functional role remains unclear. By integrating these new results with the current knowledge about Pub1p, we proposed different mechanisms of Pub1p recruitment to the mRNPs and Pub1p-mediated mRNA stabilization in which the Pub1p/Tif4631p interaction would play an important role.

Yeast Rna15 and its vertebrate orthologue CstF-64 play critical roles in mRNA 3′-end processing and in transcription termination downstream of poly(A) sites. These proteins contain N-terminal domains that recognize the poly(A) site, but little is known about their highly conserved C-terminal regions. Here we show by NMR that the C-terminal domains of CstF-64 and Rna15 fold into a three-helix bundle with an uncommon topological arrangement. The structure defines a cluster of evolutionary conserved yet exposed residues we show to be essential for the interaction between Pcf11 and Rna15. Furthermore, we demonstrate that this interaction is critical for the function of Rna15 in 3′-end processing but dispensable for transcription termination. The C-terminal domain of the Rna15 homologue Pti1 contains critical sequence alterations within this region that are predicted to prevent Pcf11 interaction, providing an explanation for the distinct functions of these two closely related proteins in the 3′-end formation of RNA polymerase II transcripts. These results define the role of the C-terminal half of Rna15 and provide insight into the network of protein/protein interactions responsible for assembly of the 3′-end processing apparatus. © 2007 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

The emergence of bacterial resistance to the major classes of antibiotics has become a serious problem over recent years. For aminoglycosides, the major biochemical mechanism for bacterial resistance is the enzymatic modification of the drug. Interestingly, in several cases, the oligosaccharide conformation recognized by the ribosomic RNA and the enzymes responsible for the antibiotic inactivation is remarkably different. This observation suggests a possible structure-based chemical strategy to overcome bacterial resistance; in principle, it should be possible to design a conformationally locked oligosaccharide that still retains antibiotic activity but that is not susceptible to enzymatic inactivation. To explore the scope and limitations of this strategy, we have synthesized several aminoglycoside derivatives locked in the ribosome-bound “bioactive” conformation. The effect of the structural preorganization on RNA binding, together with its influence on the aminoglycoside inactivation by several enzymes involved in bacterial resistance, has been studied. Our results indicate that the conformational constraint has a modest effect on their interaction with ribosomal RNA. In contrast, it may display a large impact on their enzymatic inactivation. Thus, the work presented herein provides a key example of how the conformational differences exhibited by these ligands within the binding pockets of the ribosome and of those enzymes involved in bacterial resistance can, in favorable cases, be exploited for designing new antibiotic derivatives with improved activity in resistant strains.

The recognition of specific signals encoded within the 3′-untranslated region of the newly transcribed mRNA triggers the assembly of a multiprotein machine that modifies its 3′-end. Hrp1 recognises one of such signals, the so-called polyadenylation enhancement element (PEE), promoting the recruitment of other polyadenylation factors in yeast. The molecular bases of this interaction are revealed here by the solution structure of a complex between Hrp1 and an oligonucleotide mimicking the PEE. Six consecutive bases (AUAUAU) are specifically recognised by two RNA-binding domains arranged in tandem. Both protein and RNA undergo significant conformational changes upon complex formation with a concomitant large surface burial of RNA bases. Key aspects of RNA specificity can be explained by the presence of intermolecular aromatic–aromatic contacts and hydrogen bonds. Altogether, the Hrp1–PEE structure represents one of the first steps towards understanding of the assembly of the cleavage and polyadenylation machinery at the atomic level.

The N-terminal domain of the 64 kDa subunit of the cleavage stimulation factor (CstF-64) recognizes GU-rich elements within the 3'-untranslated region of eukaryotic mRNAs. This interaction is essential for mRNA 3' end processing and transcription termination, and its strength affects the efficiency of utilization of different polyadenylation sites. The structure of the RNA-binding N-terminal domain of CstF-64 showed how the N-terminal RNA recognition motif of CstF-64 recognizes GU-rich RNAs. However, it is still perplexing how this protein can bind selectively to RNAs that are rich in G and U residues regardless of their detailed sequence composition, yet discriminate effectively against non-GU-RNAs. We investigated by NMR the dynamics of the CstF-64 RNA-binding domain, both free and bound to two GU-rich RNA sequences that represent polyadenylation regulatory elements. While the free protein displays the motional properties typical of a well-folded protein domain and is uniformly rigid, the protein-RNA interface acquires significant mobility on the micro- to millisecond time-scale once GU-rich RNAs binds to it. These motional features, we propose, are intrinsic to the functional requirement to bind all GU-rich sequences and yet to discriminate against non-GU-rich RNAs. This behavior may be a general mechanism by which some RNA-binding proteins are able to bind to classes of sequences, as opposed to a well-defined sequence or consensus.

The structure of alpha-hemoglobin stabilizing protein (AHSP), a molecular chaperone for free alpha-hemoglobin, has been determined using NMR spectroscopy. The protein native state shows conformational heterogeneity attributable to the isomerization of the peptide bond preceding a conserved proline residue. The two equally populated cis and trans forms both adopt an elongated antiparallel three alpha-helix bundle fold but display major differences in the loop between the first two helices and at the C terminus of helix 3. Proline to alanine single point mutation of the residue Pro-30 prevents the cis/trans isomerization. The structure of the P30A mutant is similar to the structure of the trans form of AHSP in the loop 1 region. Both the wild-type AHSP and the P30A mutant bind to alpha-hemoglobin, and the wild-type conformational heterogeneity is quenched upon complex formation, suggesting that just one conformation is the active form. Changes in chemical shift observed upon complex formation identify a binding interface comprising the C terminus of helix 1, the loop 1, and the N terminus of helix 2, with the exposed residues Phe-47 and Tyr-51 being attractive targets for molecular recognition. The characteristics of this interface suggest that AHSP binds at the intradimer alpha1beta1 interface in tetrameric HbA.

Vertebrate polyadenylation sites are identified by the AAUAAA signal and by GU-rich sequences downstream of the cleavage site. These are recognized by a heterotrimeric protein complex (CstF) through its 64 kDa subunit (CstF-64); the strength of this interaction affects the efficiency of poly(A) site utilization. We present the structure of the RNA-binding domain of CstF-64 containing an RNA recognition motif (RRM) augmented by N- and C-terminal helices. The C-terminal helix unfolds upon RNA binding and extends into the hinge domain where interactions with factors responsible for assembly of the polyadenylation complex occur. We propose that this conformational change initiates assembly. Consecutive Us are required for a strong CstF-GU interaction and we show how UU dinucleotides are recognized. Contacts outside the UU pocket fine tune the protein-RNA interaction and provide different affinities for distinct GU-rich elements. The protein-RNA interface remains mobile, most likely a requirement to bind many GU-rich sequences and yet discriminate against other RNAs. The structural distinction between sequences that form stable and unstable complexes provides an operational distinction between weakly and strongly processed poly(A) sites.

The past few years have witnessed remarkable progress in knowledge of the structure and function of RNA-binding proteins and their RNA complexes. X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy have provided structures for all major classes of RNA-binding proteins, both alone and complexed with RNA. New computational and experimental tools have provided unprecedented insight into the molecular basis of RNA recognition.