Search

As ECMO support durations stretch to weeks or months, ECMO patients extubate and ambulate, and oxygenators are inserted into VADs, the line between ECMO and VAD support is blurring. We sought to determine whether serious adverse event (SAE) definitions could be harmonized to support direct safety comparisons across mechanical circulatory support (MCS) forms irrespective of an oxygenator's presence. Contemporary SAE definitions for VAD and ECMO were cross-referenced by comparing the ELSO (Extra-corporeal Life Support Organization), INTERMACS (Inter-Agency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulation), and ACTION (Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network) SAE definitions. Definitions were then integrated into unified SAE definitions called the MCS Unified SAE Integrated Criteria (MUSIC) definitions where relevance to all MCS forms was prioritized. ELSO, ACTION and INTERMACS share domains pertaining to neurological injury (stroke, seizures, ischemic encephalopathy), device malfunction, hemolysis, bleeding, thrombosis, renal failure, hepatic failure, cardiac arrhythmia, wound complications, and infection, though specific definitions and severity thresholds vary. ELSO and INTERMACS treat a pump exchange due to thrombus as a device malfunction whereas ACTION does not unless pump output is impaired. ELSO has unique domains for compartment syndrome and pneumothorax while ACTION/INTERMACS have unique domains for HTN, MI, psychiatric illness, respiratory failure, RHF, and VTE. As an example, Table 1 compares the ACTION and ELSO definitions for hemolysis with the proposed integrated definition and rationale summarized. It is possible to develop uniform SAE definitions that are common to both ECMO and VAD support. These definitions may be useful for MCS clinical trials and provide a meaningful way to compare SAE rates across MCS devices irrespective of the presence of an oxygenator. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To present recommendations and consensus statements with supporting literature for the clinical management of neonates and children supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) from the Pediatric ECMO Anticoagulation CollaborativE (PEACE) consensus conference., Data Sources: Systematic review was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases from January 1988 to May 2021, followed by serial meetings of international, interprofessional experts in the management ECMO for critically ill children., Study Selection: The management of ECMO anticoagulation for critically ill children., Data Extraction: Within each of eight subgroup, two authors reviewed all citations independently, with a third independent reviewer resolving any conflicts., Data Synthesis: A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, from January 1988 to May 2021. Each panel developed evidence-based and, when evidence was insufficient, expert-based statements for the clinical management of anticoagulation for children supported with ECMO. These statements were reviewed and ratified by 48 PEACE experts. Consensus was obtained using the Research and Development/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Results were summarized using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method. We developed 23 recommendations, 52 expert consensus statements, and 16 good practice statements covering the management of ECMO anticoagulation in three broad categories: general care and monitoring; perioperative care; and nonprocedural bleeding or thrombosis. Gaps in knowledge and research priorities were identified, along with three research focused good practice statements., Conclusions: The 91 statements focused on clinical care will form the basis for standardization and future clinical trials., Competing Interests: Drs. Alexander’s and Muszynski’s institutions received funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Drs. Alexander, Bembea, Himebauch, Barbaro, and Muszynski received support for article research from the NIH. Drs. Alexander’s and Bembea’s institutions received funding from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO). Dr. Alexander’s institution received funding from Novartis (Prospective Trial to Assess the Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Neprilysin Inhibitor LCZ696 Versus Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor for the Medical Treatment of Pediatric HF [PANORAMA-HF]). Dr. Alexander disclosed that she is Treasurer of the Board of Directors of ELSO, past Co-Chair of Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (Pedi-ECMO). Dr. Bembea’s institution received funding from the National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke and a Grifols Investigator Sponsored Research Grant. Dr. Cheifetz received funding from UptoDate. Dr. Dalton received funding from Innovative Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Concepts, Medtronic, Entegrion, and Hemocue. Drs. Dalton, Ozment, Barbaro, Almond, Brandão, Baumann Kreuziger, Paden, and Ryerson disclosed the off-label product use of pediatric ECMO-related medications for anticoagulation. Dr. Himebauch’s institution received funding from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (K23HL153759). Drs. Karam’s and Nellis’s institutions received funding from the NHBLI (R34HL159119). Dr. Ozment received funding from Kaufman & Canoles, Social Cascade, and Wiseman Ashworth Law Group. Dr. Steiner’s institution received funding from the Department of Defense (DoD); she received funding from Medtronic and Octapharma; she disclosed that she is a Pumps for Kids, Infantsand Neonates (PumpKIN) trial Data Safety and Monitoring Board member. Dr. Alexander’s and Thiagarajan’s institution received funding from the DoD Clinical Trial Award for Trial of Indication-Based Transfusion of RBCs in ECMO trial (W81XWH2210301). Dr. Thiagarajan received funding from Society of Critical Care Medicine and ELSO. Dr. Zantek disclosed that she is a Board Member and Vice President of the North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association and Board Member of the American Society for Apheresis, the External Quality Assurance in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, and Blood Network subgroup of Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators groups; she disclosed that her spouse is an employee of Boston Scientific and owns stock in Endo International PLC. Dr. Barbaro’s institution received funding from the NHLBI (R01 HL153519 and K12 HL138039); he disclosed that he is ELSO Board of Directors and Pedi-ECMO Co-Chair. Dr. Emani received funding from Chiesi Pharma. Dr. Hyslop disclosed he is Co-Chair of ELSO Registry Database Development Committee and Coordinator Liaison to ELSO Steering Committee. Dr. Baumann Kreuziger received funding from the Health Resources and Services Administration Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Dr. Paden disclosed that he is past president and board member of ELSO. Dr. Ryerson received an honorarium from Instrumentation Laboratory for consultation work. Dr. Sloan commenced employment with CSL Behring after the consensus process was complete. Dr. Patregnani received funding from Mallinckrodt; he discloses consultation payments from MNK pharmaceuticals and Pfizer. The Executive Committee (Drs. Alexander, Muszynski, Bembea, Cheifetz, Steiner, and Barbaro) served as arbitrators for conflict-of-interest management. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.)

Objectives: To identify and prioritize research questions for anticoagulation and hemostasis management of neonates and children supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) from the Pediatric ECMO Anticoagulation CollaborativE (PEACE) consensus., Data Sources: Systematic review was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases from January 1988 to May 2021, followed by serial consensus conferences of international, interprofessional experts in the management of ECMO for critically ill neonates and children., Study Selection: The management of ECMO anticoagulation for critically ill neonates and children., Data Extraction: Within each of the eight subgroups, two authors reviewed all citations independently, with a third independent reviewer resolving any conflicts., Data Synthesis: Following the systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from January 1988 to May 2021, and the consensus process for clinical recommendations and consensus statements, PEACE panel experts constructed research priorities using the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative methodology. Twenty research topics were prioritized, falling within five domains (definitions and outcomes, therapeutics, anticoagulant monitoring, protocolized management, and impact of the ECMO circuit and its components on hemostasis)., Conclusions: We present the research priorities identified by the PEACE expert panel after a systematic review of existing evidence informing clinical care of neonates and children managed with ECMO. More research is required within the five identified domains to ultimately inform and improve the care of this vulnerable population., Competing Interests: Drs. Muszynski and Alexander’s institutions received funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Drs. Muszynski, Bembea, Himebauch, Barbaro, and Alexander received support for article research from the NIH. Dr. Bembea’s institution received funding from the National Institute of Neurologic Disorder and Stroke (R01NS106292) and a Grifols Investigator Sponsored Research Grant. Drs. Bembea, Steiner, and Thiagarajan’s institutions received funding from the Department of Defense. Dr. Cheifetz received funding from UptoDate. Dr. Dalton received funding from Innovative Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Concepts, Entegrion, and Hemocue; she disclosed the off-label product use of ECMO equipment and drugs for anticoagulation. Dr. Himebauch receives support from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number K23HL153759. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. Dr. Said acknowledges research support from the Children’s Discovery Institute Faculty Development Award at Washington University in St. Louis. Dr. Ozment received funding from Kaufman & Canoles Law Firm, Wiseman Ashworth Law Group, and Social Cascade; she disclosed the off-label product use of Heparin and bivalirudin use in neonatal and pediatric patients on ECMO. Dr. Steiner received funding from Octapharma, MedTronic, and PumpKIN DSMB; she disclosed the off-label product use of rFVIIA, TXA, Amicar, Kcentra. Dr. Thiagarajan received funding from the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO). Dr. Zantek received funding from the North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association (NASCOLA), the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA), and BloodNet; she disclosed that she is a Board Member of External Quality Assurance in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, a committee member of NASCOLA, ASFA, the Association for the Advancement of Blood and Biotherapies, the College of American Pathologists, and the International Society for Laboratory Hematology; she disclosed that her spouse is an employee of Boston Scientific and has a financial interest in Boston Scientific and Endo International. Dr. Barbaro’s institution received funding from the NIH (R01 HL153519 and K12 HL138039); he disclosed that he is a Board Member for ELSO and Co-Chair for Pedi-ECMO. Dr. Alexander’s institution received funding from ELSO and Novartis. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.)

Objectives: To derive systematic-review informed, modified Delphi consensus regarding anticoagulation monitoring assays and target levels in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for the Pediatric ECMO Anticoagulation CollaborativE., Data Sources: A structured literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases from January 1988 to May 2021., Study Selection: Anticoagulation monitoring of pediatric patients on ECMO., Data Extraction: Two authors reviewed all citations independently, with a third independent reviewer resolving any conflicts. Evidence tables were constructed using a standardized data extraction form., Data Synthesis: Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool or the revised Cochrane risk of bias for randomized trials, as appropriate and the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Forty-eight experts met over 2 years to develop evidence-based recommendations and, when evidence was lacking, expert-based consensus statements for clinical recommendations focused on anticoagulation monitoring and targets, using a web-based modified Delphi process to build consensus (defined as > 80% agreement). One weak recommendation, two consensus statements, and three good practice statements were developed and, in all, agreement greater than 80% was reached. We also derived some resources for anticoagulation monitoring for ECMO clinician use at the bedside., Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to formulate optimal anticoagulation monitoring during pediatric ECMO, but we propose one recommendation, two consensus and three good practice statements. Overall, the available pediatric evidence is poor and significant gaps exist in the literature., Competing Interests: The Executive Committee (Dr. Alexander, Dr. Muszynski, Dr. Bembea, Dr. Cheifetz, Dr. Steiner, and Dr. Barbaro) served as arbitrators for conflict-of-interest management. Dr. Alexander’s institution received funding from Novartis (Prospective Trial to Assess the Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Neprilysin Inhibitor LCZ696 Versus Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor for the Medical Treatment of Pediatric HF [PANORAMA-HF]). Dr. Ozment received funding from Kaufman & Canoles Law Firm, Social Cascade, and Wiseman Ashworth Law Group. Drs. Ozment and Monagle disclosed the off-label product use of anticoagulants (heparin and bivalirudin) in neonatal and pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) patients. Drs. Alexander and Muszynski’s institutions received funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Dr. Alexander’s institution received funding from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) and Novartis. Drs. Alexander and Muszynski received support for article research from the NIH. Dr. Emani’s institution received funding from Cellvie Bio; he received funding from Cheisi Pharma. Dr. Hyslop disclosed that on a volunteer basis he is the Co-Chair of ELSO Registry Database Development Committee and Coordinator Liaison to ELSO Steering Committee. Dr. Alexander and Thiagarajan’s institution received funding from the US Department of Defense Clinical Trials Award, Trial of Indication-Based Transfusion of RBCs in ECMO trial (W81XWH2210301). Dr. Thiagarajan received funding from ELSO and the Society of Critical Care Medicine. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.)

Pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is an increasingly utilized, life-saving technology with high mortality and morbidity. A complex technology employed urgently or emergently for some of the sickest children in the hospital by a large multidisciplinary team, ECMO is an ideal area for using quality improvement strategies to reduce the variability in care and improve patient outcomes. We review critical concepts from quality improvement and apply them to patient selection and management, staffing, credentialing and continuing education, and the variability of management among providers and institutions., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None, (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Infection with influenza virus causes substantial morbidity and mortality globally, although antiviral treatments are available. Previous studies have suggested that anti-influenza immune plasma could be beneficial as treatment, but they were not designed as randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled trials. Therefore, we aimed to prospectively evaluate the clinical efficacy of high-titre immune plasma compared with standard low-titre plasma to improve outcomes in patients with severe influenza A infection., Methods: We did this randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial at 41 US medical centres to assess the efficacy of high-titre anti-influenza plasma (haemagglutination inhibition antibody titre ≥1:80) compared with low-titre plasma (≤1:10). Children and adults with PCR-confirmed influenza A infection, a National Early Warning score of 3 or greater, and onset of illness within 6 days before randomisation were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) using an interactive web response system to receive either two units (or paediatric equivalent) of high-titre plasma (high-titre group) or low-titre plasma (low-titre group), and were followed up for 28 days from randomisation. High-titre and low-titre plasma had the same appearance. Randomisation was stratified by severity (in intensive care unit, not in intensive care but requiring supplemental oxygen, or not in intensive care and not requiring supplemental oxygen) and age (<18 years and ≥18 years). All participants, site staff, and the study team were masked to treatment allocation until after the final database lock. The primary endpoint was clinical status assessed by a six-point ordinal scale on day 7 (death, in intensive care, hospitalised but requiring supplemental oxygen, hospitalised not requiring supplemental oxygen, discharged but unable to resume normal activities, and discharged with full resumption of normal activities) analysed in a proportional odds model (an odds ratio [OR] >1 indicates improvement in clinical status across all categories for the high-titre vs the low-titre group). The primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population, excluding two participants who did not receive plasma. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02572817., Findings: Participants were recruited between Jan 26, 2016, and April 19, 2018. Of 200 participants enrolled (177 adults and 23 children), 140 met the criteria for randomisation and were assigned to the high-titre group (n=92) or to the control low-titre group (n=48). One participant from each group did not receive plasma. At baseline, 60 (43%) of 138 participants were in intensive care and 55 (71%) of 78 participants who were not in intensive care required oxygen. 93% of planned plasma infusions were completed. The study was terminated in July, 2018, when independent efficacy analysis showed low conditional power to detect an effect of high-titre plasma even if full accrual (150 participants) was achieved. The proportional OR for improved clinical status on day 7 was 1·22 (95% CI 0·65-2·29, p=0·54). 47 (34%) of 138 participants experienced 88 serious adverse events: 32 (35%) with 60 events in the high-titre group and 15 (32%) with 28 events in the low-titre group. The most common serious adverse events were acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS; four [4%] vs two [4%]), allergic transfusion reactions (two [2%] vs two [4%]), and respiratory distress (three [3%] vs none). 65 (47%) participants experienced 183 adverse events: 42 (46%) with 126 events in the high-titre group and 23 (49%) with 57 events in the low-titre group. The most common adverse events were anaemia (four [3%] vs two [4%]) and ARDS (four [3%] vs three [5%]). Ten patients died during the study (six [7%] in the high-titre group vs four [9%] in the low-titre group, p=0·73). The most common cause of death was worsening of acute respiratory distress syndrome (two [2%] vs two [4%] patients)., Interpretation: High-titre anti-influenza plasma conferred no significant benefit over non-immune plasma. Although our study did not have the precision to rule out a small, clinically relevant effect, the benefit is insufficient to justify the use of immune plasma for treating patients with severe influenza A., Funding: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD, USA)., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Escherichia coli NAD synthetase was overexpressed and purified to homogeneity. The recombinant protein was active in an in vitro enzyme assay. The enzyme required approximately 1.5 mM magnesium for optimal activity. The pH optimum was found to be 8.0-8.5. The recombinant protein was crystallized at room temperature using the hanging-drop vapor diffusion technique with 1.5 M lithium sulfate, 0. 1 M Hepes buffer at pH 7.5 as precipitant. The protein was also crystallized in the presence of its substrates, nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide and adenosine triphosphate under similar conditions. These crystals diffract to 2.0-A resolution and belong to trigonal space group P3(1)21 with unit cell dimensions of a = b = 91.766, c = 74.17 A and alpha = beta = 90 degrees, gamma = 120 degrees. The structure of the complex has been determined using the molecular replacement method., (Copyright 1999 Academic Press.)

We have isolated cDNAs coding for the complete amino acid sequences of cholinesterase 1 (ChE1) and cholinesterase 2 (ChE2) from amphioxus. Both ChE transcripts have the characteristics of H-type catalytic subunits, which are inserted in the membrane via an ethanolamine-glycan-phosphatidylinositol anchor. The members of the catalytic triad of ChEs, the three pairs of cysteine residues involved in intrachain disulfide bonding, a cysteine near the carboxy terminal of both sequences, which could mediate interchain disulfide bonding, and 11 of the 14 aromatic amino acids that line the catalytic gorge of AChE are conserved. A remarkable difference between the two enzymes is in the region of the acyl-binding pocket, which plays an important role in determining substrate specificity in cholinesterases. ChE2 contains a sequence that resembles the acyl pocket of invertebrate ChE, while the acyl-binding site of ChE1 is novel. There are also differences between the two enzymes in the peripheral anionic site, which mediates inhibition by certain ligands. In vitro expression in COS-7 cells demonstrates that ChE2 hydrolyzes acetylthiocholine almost exclusively, while ChE1 hydrolyzes both acetylthiocholine and butyrylthiocholine. Both enzymes are inhibited comparably by BW284c51, but ChE1 is considerably more resistant to inhibition by propidium, ethopropazine, and eserine than is ChE2. Velocity sedimentation indicates that ChE1 and ChE2 are present as amphiphilic and nonamphiphilic G2 forms in vivo and in vitro. Another molecular form, which sediments at 17 S, is also present in vivo. Nondenaturing gel electrophoresis in conjunction with digestion by phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C demonstrates that the vast majority of ChE1 and ChE2 is present as ethanolamine-glycan-phosphatidylinositol-anchored G2 forms in vivo. ChE1 also possesses an ethanolamine-glycan-phosphatidylinositol-anchor in vitro; however, ChE2 produced in vitro could not be detected on nondenaturing gels.