Search

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the hypothesis test results after categorizing the scale scores with cut-off points and to assess whether similar results would be obtained in that best represent the categories., Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between March 15 and 20, 2023 via the Lime Survey. The questionnaire included questions about the sociodemographic and life characteristics of the participants and the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II). Four groups (minimal, mild, moderate, severe depression) were formed using the cutoff points. Data analysis was performed with all participants and referred to as the conventional analysis group. Then, six subanalysis groups were determined to best represent the groups formed according to the BDI-II. In each BDI-II category, six subanalysis groups were created, including those between Q1-Q3 (IQR group), including those within ± 1 std, including those between 5p-95p (90% of the sample), including those between 2.5p-97.5p (95% of the sample). In addition, 100 different samples were randomly selected containing 50% of each group., Results: Of the 1950 participants, 84.7% (n = 1652) were female and 15.3% (n = 298) were male. In terms of depression, it was observed that the significance varied in the analysis groups for sex (p = 0.039), medication use (p = 0.009) and age (p = 0.010) variables. However, these variables were not significant in some of the subanalysis groups. On the other hand, a p < 0.001 value was obtained for income, physical activity, health perception, body shape perception, life satisfaction, and quality of life variables in terms of depression in the conventional analysis group, and it was seen that the significance continued in all subanalysis groups., Conclusions: Our findings showed that variables with p < 0.001 in the conventional analysis group maintained their significance in the other analysis groups. In addition, as the p value got closer to 0.05, we observed that the significance changed according to different cutoff points in the analysis groups. In addition, 50% randomly selected samples support these results. At the end of our study, we reached results that support the necessity of secondary tests in the evaluation of scales. Although further studies are needed, we anticipate that our study will shed light on other studies., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: We aimed to assess the usefulness of the Salzburg Consensus Criteria (SCC) for determining the prognosis of critically ill patients with nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE)., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with unconsciousness followed up in the intensive care unit (ICU). Three clinical neurophysiologists, one of them blinded to clinical and laboratory data, reevaluated all EEG data independently and determined NCSE according to SCC. The incidence of NCSE and ictal EEG patterns and their relationship to clinical, laboratory, neuroradiological, and prognostic findings were assessed., Results: A total of 107 consecutive patients with mean age 68.2 ± 15.3 years (57 females) were enrolled in the study. Primary neuronal injury was detected in 59 patients (55.7%). Thirty-three patients (30.8%) were diagnosed as NCSE. While authors decided to treat 33 patients (30.8%), 32 patients (29.9%) had been treated in real-life evaluation. Clinical and EEG improvement were detected in 12 patients (11.3%) in real-life treatment group showing correlation with lack of intubation and ICU stay related to postsurgical event. Rate of mortality (45.8%) was high showing association with systemic-metabolic etiology, severity of coma and presence of "plus" modifiers in the EEG., Conclusion and Significance: Our findings suggest that SCC is highly compatible with clinical practice in the decision for treatment of patients with NCSE. The presence of "plus" modifiers in the EEG was found to be associated with mortality in these patients and was a significant marker for the high mortality rate.

In this study, we compared the bone-healing effects of the local application of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and hyaluronic acid (HA) to bilateral tibial fractures in rats. Twenty-three adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were used. Twenty-two animals were randomly allocated to a control group (n = 6) and 2 study groups: PRF (n = 8) and HA (n = 8). The 23rd rat was used as a donor to obtain PRF. Each group was divided into 2 subgroups for histomorphometric and radiologic assessments at 2 and 6 weeks. Foreign body reaction, necrosis, inflammation, new bone formation, and fibrosis were investigated as bone healing parameters in terms of histopathologic analysis. The difference between the groups for these parameters was evaluated. The radiologic evaluation was performed by comparing the 3-dimensional reconstruction images of the fracture sites between the study and control groups. Histomorphometric evaluation showed that at 2 weeks postoperatively, the control group showed lesser bone formation (26.1 ± 6.6%) when compared to the study (HA: 54.7 ± 9.7%; PRF: 75.3 ± 19.2%) groups and PRF group showed highest total ossification. At 6 weeks postoperatively the PRF group showed lesser total ossification (50.7 ± 28.2%) when compared to control (76.3 ± 21.7%) and HA group. The HA (88.8 ± 13.3%) showed highest total ossification. In the control group, fibrosis was more prominent at week 6, whereas in the HA and PRF groups the amount of ossification increased. In contrast to histopathologic healing, radiologic bone healing did not differ significantly among the study and control groups 2 weeks after surgery, whereas at 6 weeks, the results of radiologic bone formation were in accordance with those of histopathologic bone healing.

Introduction: Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is a major cause of death in patients with chronic drug-resistant epilepsy, and peri-ictal prone position has been elucidated as a risk factor for SUDEP. We aimed to investigate consecutive patients in peri-ictal prone positions in our video EEG monitoring (VEM) unit and compare patients with and without peri-ictal prone position to emphasize its relationship with other independent risk factors for SUDEP., Methods: We retrospectively screened all patients with peri-ictal prone position who underwent VEM for a 10-year period and these patients constituted the prone (+) group. All patients without peri-ictal prone position who underwent VEM in the past 2 years constituted the prone (-) control group. Sequences of peri-ictal positions and interventions were evaluated. Clinical and laboratory features and SUDEP-7 scores were compared between the groups., Results: A total of 21 seizures were identified with peri-ictal prone position from 16 patients. SUDEP-7 scores were significantly higher in the prone (+) group. Longer duration of epilepsy, early age at seizure onset, mental retardation, and frequency of seizures of any type (>50 seizures per month for the past year) were found significantly different between the prone (+) and prone (-) groups., Conclusion: Peri-ictal prone position in the VEM unit may relate with other independent risk factors of SUDEP, especially with mental retardation. Nocturnal supervision becomes important to reduce SUDEP risk, especially in patients with mental retardation.