Search

Cigarette smoking, either active or passive, is the most important risk factor in the development of human lung cancer. Mounting evidence indicates that cigarette smoke constituents not only contribute to tumorigenesis but also may increase the spread of cancer in the body. Nitrosamine 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) is formed by nitrosation of nicotine and has been identified as the most potent carcinogen. NNK, an important component in cigarette smoke, may also promote tumor metastasis by regulating cell motility. Here we found that NNK can induce activation of a functionally interdependent protein kinase cascade, including c-Src, PKCι and FAK, in association with increased migration and invasion of human lung cancer cells. c-Src, PKCι and FAK are extensively co-localized in the cytoplasm. Treatment of cells with α(7) nAChR specific inhibitor α-bungarotoxin (α-BTX) blocks NNK-stimulated activation of c-Src, PKCι and FAK and suppresses cell migration and invasion. Intriguingly, NNK enhances c-Src/PKCι and PKCι/FAK bindings, indicating a potential mechanism by which these kinases activate each other. Specific disruption of c-Src, PKCι or FAK expression by RNA interference significantly reduces NNK-induced cell migration and invasion. These findings suggest that NNK-induced migration and invasion may occur in a mechanism through activation of a c-Src/PKCι/FAK loop, which can contribute to metastasis and/or development of human lung cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

What Is This Summary About?: This is a summary of a phase 2 clinical study called DeLLphi-301. The study looked at how effective and safe a medicine called tarlatamab was in participants with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Participants previously received at least two other treatments for their SCLC. Tarlatamab is a new medicine that locates a protein called DLL3 on the cancer, which allows T cells to attack the cancer. T cells belong to the body's natural defense system known as the immune system. The DeLLphi-301 study separated participants into two groups to receive tarlatamab 10 mg or 100 mg to determine which dose best shrank SCLC with minimal side effects. All participants received a small first dose (1 mg tarlatamab) to decrease the risk of an immune system reaction called cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Tarlatamab was given through the participant's vein once every 2 weeks. This method of administration is known as intravenous (IV) infusion., What Were the Results of the Dellphi-301 Study?: In the group given 10 mg tarlatamab, 40% of participants responded to treatment (cancer shrank). In the group given 100 mg tarlatamab, 32% of participants responded to treatment (cancer shrank). After taking tarlatamab at either dose, 59% of participants lived for at least 6 months without their cancer growing or getting worse.The most common side effect was CRS, which occurred in 51% of participants in the group given 10 mg tarlatamab and 61% of participants in the group given 100 mg tarlatamab. Other common side effects were decreased appetite, fever, constipation, and anemia. Some participants had a type of immune reaction called immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). A small number of participants (3%) stopped taking tarlatamab because of side effects related to tarlatamab., What Do the Results From the Dellphi-301 Study Mean?: The study found that tarlatamab given every 2 weeks shrank SCLC in participants with SCLC who received previous treatments. Participants given the 10 mg tarlatamab dose had fewer side effects than those given the 100 mg tarlatamab dose. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05740566 (DeLLphi-304) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Purpose: International medical graduates (IMGs) are an essential component of the oncology workforce in the United States, comprising a third of all practicing oncologists and almost half of hematology/oncology fellows. In this article, we discuss the contributions of IMGs in the US oncology workforce, review unique challenges faced by IMGs, and propose potential solutions to overcome these challenges., Methods: ASCO's IMG Community of Practice was established with the mission to connect, mentor, guide, raise awareness, and overcome the challenges unique to IMGs interested in pursuing medical oncology in the United States. The content of this article is based on discussions at the IMG Community of Practice meetings at ASCO's 2023 and 2024 Annual Meetings., Results: IMGs bring an inherent diversity of thought and experience to the oncology workforce. They provide high-quality, culture- and language-concordant care to a diverse population of patients with cancer. However, IMGs in oncology face significant hardships throughout their careers, including visa-related restrictions, psychosocial and cultural struggles, as well as differential treatment while applying for residency and fellowship training, and early career positions. Greater awareness of these challenges among the members of the hematology/oncology community, along with institutional and individual efforts to support IMGs, is warranted., Conclusion: We encourage oncology professionals and institutions to join our efforts in recognizing the unique paths of IMGs and providing support and advocacy to maximize the potential of IMGs in the US oncology workforce.

Racial and ethnic minority populations are consistently under-represented in oncology clinical trials despite comprising a disproportionate share of a cancer burden. Phase I oncology clinical trials pose a unique challenge and opportunity for minority inclusion. Here we compared the sociodemographic characteristics of patients participating in phase 1 clinical trials a National Cancer Institute ( NCI)-designated comprehensive center to all patients at the center, patients with new cancer diagnosis in metropolitan Atlanta and patients with new cancer diagnoses in the state of Georgia. From 2015 to 2020, 2325 patients (43.4% female, 56.6% male) consented to participate in a phase I trial. Grouped self-reported race distribution was 70.3% White, 26.2% Black, and 3.5% other. Of new patient registrations at Winship Cancer Institute (N = 107 497) (50% F, 50% M), grouped race distribution was 63.3% White, 32.0% Black, and 4.7% other. Patients with new cancer diagnoses in metro Atlanta from 2015 to 2016 (N = 31101) were 58.4% White, 37.2% Black, and 4.3% other. Race and sex distribution of phase I patients was significantly different than Winship patients (P < .001). Over time, percent of White patients decreased in both phase I and Winship groups (P = .009 and P < .001, respectively); percentage of females did not change in either group (P = .54 phase I, P = .063 Winship). Although phase I patients were more likely to be White, male, and privately ensured than the Winship cohort, from 2015 to 2020 the percentage of White patients in phase I trials and among all new patients treated at Winship decreased. The intent of characterizing existing disparities is to improve the representation of patients from racial and ethnic minority backgrounds in phase I clinical trials., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Tarlatamab, a bispecific T-cell engager immunotherapy targeting delta-like ligand 3 and CD3, showed promising antitumor activity in a phase 1 trial in patients with previously treated small-cell lung cancer., Methods: In this phase 2 trial, we evaluated the antitumor activity and safety of tarlatamab, administered intravenously every 2 weeks at a dose of 10 mg or 100 mg, in patients with previously treated small-cell lung cancer. The primary end point was objective response (complete or partial response), as assessed by blinded independent central review according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1., Results: Overall, 220 patients received tarlatamab; patients had previously received a median of two lines of treatment. Among patients evaluated for antitumor activity and survival, the median follow-up was 10.6 months in the 10-mg group and 10.3 months in the 100-mg group. An objective response occurred in 40% (97.5% confidence interval [CI], 29 to 52) of the patients in the 10-mg group and in 32% (97.5% CI, 21 to 44) of those in the 100-mg group. Among patients with an objective response, the duration of response was at least 6 months in 59% (40 of 68 patients). Objective responses at the time of data cutoff were ongoing in 22 of 40 patients (55%) in the 10-mg group and in 16 of 28 patients (57%) in the 100-mg group. The median progression-free survival was 4.9 months (95% CI, 2.9 to 6.7) in the 10-mg group and 3.9 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 4.4) in the 100-mg group; the estimates of overall survival at 9 months were 68% and 66% of patients, respectively. The most common adverse events were cytokine-release syndrome (in 51% of the patients in the 10-mg group and in 61% of those in the 100-mg group), decreased appetite (in 29% and 44%, respectively), and pyrexia (in 35% and 33%). Cytokine-release syndrome occurred primarily during treatment cycle 1, and events in most of the patients were grade 1 or 2 in severity. Grade 3 cytokine-release syndrome occurred less frequently in the 10-mg group (in 1% of the patients) than in the 100-mg group (in 6%). A low percentage of patients (3%) discontinued tarlatamab because of treatment-related adverse events., Conclusions: Tarlatamab, administered as a 10-mg dose every 2 weeks, showed antitumor activity with durable objective responses and promising survival outcomes in patients with previously treated small-cell lung cancer. No new safety signals were identified. (Funded by Amgen; DeLLphi-301 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05060016.)., (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Purpose: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy with limited treatments. Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) is aberrantly expressed in most SCLC. Tarlatamab (AMG 757), a bispecific T-cell engager molecule, binds both DLL3 and CD3 leading to T-cellb-mediated tumor lysis. Herein, we report phase I results of tarlatamab in patients with SCLC., Patients and Methods: This study evaluated tarlatamab in patients with relapsed/refractory SCLC. The primary end point was safety. Secondary end points included antitumor activity by modified RECIST 1.1, overall survival, and pharmacokinetics., Results: By July 19, 2022, 107 patients received tarlatamab in dose exploration (0.003 to 100 mg; n = 73) and expansion (100 mg; n = 34) cohorts. Median prior lines of anticancer therapy were 2 (range, 1-6); 49.5% received antiprogrammed death-1/programmed death ligand-1 therapy. Any-grade treatment-related adverse events occurred in 97 patients (90.7%) and grade b % 3 in 33 patients (30.8%). One patient (1%) had grade 5 pneumonitis. Cytokine release syndrome was the most common treatment-related adverse event, occurring in 56 patients (52%) including grade 3 in one patient (1%). Maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Objective response rate was 23.4% (95% CI, 15.7 to 32.5) including two complete and 23 partial responses. The median duration of response was 12.3 months (95% CI, 6.6 to 14.9). The disease control rate was 51.4% (95% CI, 41.5 to 61.2). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.7 months (95% CI, 2.1 to 5.4) and 13.2 months (95% CI, 10.5 to not reached), respectively. Exploratory analysis suggests that selecting for increased DLL3 expression can result in increased clinical benefit., Conclusion: In patients with heavily pretreated SCLC, tarlatamab demonstrated manageable safety with encouraging response durability. Further evaluation of this promising molecule is ongoing.

Cisplatin is a bedrock of cancer management and one of the most used chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of germ cell, lung, bladder, ovarian, and head and neck cancers. Approximately 500,000 patients diagnosed annually with these cancer types in the United States could be candidates for treatment with cisplatin. There is a 5-fold increase in the risk of hearing impairment or ototoxicity with cisplatin, which can manifest as ringing in the ear (tinnitus), high-frequency hearing loss, and at late stages, a decreased ability to hear normal conversation. More than half of adult and pediatric patients with cancer treated with cisplatin developed hearing impairment with major impact on patients' health-related quality of life. A considerable evidence gap persists regarding the burden and effective prevention and interception strategies for cisplatin-induced ototoxicity, especially in adult patients with cancer. We conducted a review of the published literature to provide an update on the status of this important clinical challenge. We also surveyed practicing oncologists within our network of academic and community practices to gain a better understanding of how the published literature compares with real-world practice. Our review of the literature showed a lack of standardized guidelines for monitoring and treatment of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity, especially in the adult cancer patient population. Our survey of practicing oncologists mirrored the findings from the published literature with a heterogeneity of practice, which highlights the need for standardization.

Purpose: Thyroid cancer recurrence following curative thyroidectomy is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, but current surveillance strategies are inadequate for early detection. Prior studies indicate that tissue glycosylation is altered in thyroid cancer, but the utility of serum glycosylation in thyroid cancer surveillance remains unexplored. We therefore assessed the potential utility of altered serum glycomic profile as a tumor-specific target for disease surveillance in recurrent thyroid cancer., Experimental Design: We employed banked serum samples from patients with recurrent thyroid cancer post thyroidectomy and healthy controls. N-glycans were enzymatically released from serum glycoproteins, labeled via permethylation, and analyzed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Global level and specific subtypes of glycan structures were compared between patients and controls., Results: We evaluated 28 independent samples from 13 patients with cancer recurrence and 15 healthy controls. Global features of glycosylation, including N-glycan class and terminal glycan modifications were similar between groups, but three of 35 individual glycans showed significant differences. The three glycans were biosynthetically related biantennary core fucosylated N-glycans that only varied by the degree of galactosylation (G0F, G1F, and G2F; G: galactose, F: fucose). The ratio of G0F:G1F that captures reduced galactosylation was observed in patients samples but not in healthy controls (p = 0.004) and predicted thyroid cancer recurrence (AUC = 0.82, CI 95% = 0.64-0.99)., Conclusions: Altered N-glycomic profile was associated with thyroid cancer recurrence. This serum-based biomarker would be useful as an effective surveillance tool to improve the care and prognosis of thyroid cancer after prospective validation., (© 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas such as small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have poor survival and high relapse rates. DLL3 is found on these carcinomas and has become a target of increasing interest in recent years. The bispecific DLL3/CD3 T-cell engager BI 764532 has been shown to induce complete tumor regression in a human T cell-engrafted mouse model. Here, we describe the study design of a first-in-human, phase I, multicenter, open-label, non-randomized, dose-escalation study in patients with SCLC or other DLL3-positive neuroendocrine carcinomas. The study will determine the maximum tolerated dose and evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of BI 764532 monotherapy.

Introduction: The crosstalk between receptor kinase signaling, such as EGFR and androgen receptor signaling, suggests a potential interaction between androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and lung cancer outcome. Methods: We employed the SEER−Medicare data of lung cancer patients diagnosed between 1988 and 2005 to test for an association between ADT for prostate cancer and lung cancer outcome. We employed the Kaplan−Meier method and Cox proportional hazard with log-rank test model to assess any significant impact of ADT on survival. Results: We included data from 367,750 lung cancer patients; 17.4%, 2.9%, 33.6% and 46.1% with stages I, II, III and IV, respectively; 84.5% were >65 years; 57.2% males; 84.2% Caucasians and 9.3% Blacks. There were 11,061 patients (3%) with an initial prostate cancer diagnosis followed by lung cancer (P-L group); 3017 (0.8%) with an initial diagnosis of lung cancer and subsequent prostate cancer diagnosis (L-P group); the remainder had only lung cancer (L group). Stage I lung cancer was most common in the L-P group compared to the L and P-L groups—54% vs. 17.13% vs. 17.92%, p < 0.0001 for L-P, L and P-L, respectively. The median OS for lung cancer diagnosis was 93 months versus 10 and 9 months, respectively, for the L-P, L and P-L subgroups. ADT was associated with improved survival on multivariate analysis, especially in Caucasian patients (HR of death: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.76−0.97; p = 0.012). Conclusion: ADT was associated with improved outcome for NSCLC, in line with the hypothesis of a role for the androgen receptor in lung cancer. Our findings support a systematic evaluation of the potential benefit of ADT as a therapy for lung cancer.

Comprehensive sequencing of patient tumors reveals genomic mutations across tumor types that enable tumorigenesis and progression. A subset of oncogenic driver mutations results in neomorphic activity where the mutant protein mediates functions not engaged by the parental molecule. Here, we identify prevalent variant-enabled neomorph-protein-protein interactions (neoPPI) with a quantitative high-throughput differential screening (qHT-dS) platform. The coupling of highly sensitive BRET biosensors with miniaturized coexpression in an ultra-HTS format allows large-scale monitoring of the interactions of wild-type and mutant variant counterparts with a library of cancer-associated proteins in live cells. The screening of 17,792 interactions with 2,172,864 data points revealed a landscape of gain of interactions encompassing both oncogenic and tumor suppressor mutations. For example, the recurrent BRAF V600E lesion mediates KEAP1 neoPPI, rewiring a BRAF V600E /KEAP1 signaling axis and creating collateral vulnerability to NQO1 substrates, offering a combination therapeutic strategy. Thus, cancer genomic alterations can create neo-interactions, informing variant-directed therapeutic approaches for precision medicine., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests H.F. is scientific founder of PiVista Therapeutics., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Aberrant mTOR pathway and somatostatin receptor signaling are implicated in thyroid cancer and offer potential therapeutic targets. We assessed the clinical efficacy of everolimus and Pasireotide long-acting release (LAR) in radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) and medullary thyroid cancer (MTC)., Patients and Methods: Adults with progressive MTC and DTC untreated or treated with no more than one systemic agent were eligible. The trial was designed to establish the most promising regimen and the optimal combination sequence. Patients were randomized to start treatment with single agent everolimus (10 mg QD; Arm A), pasireotide-LAR (60 mg intramuscular injection, Q4 weeks; Arm B), or the combination (Arm C). At initial progression (PFS1), patients on Arm A or B switched to the combination and continued until progression (PFS2). Efficacy was measured by RECIST criteria., Results: Study enrolled 42 patients: median age 65 years; female 17 (40.5%); White 31 (73.8%), African American 6 (14.3%), others 5 (11.9); DTC 32 (76.2%); MTC 10 (23.8%). There was no objective response by RECIST criteria across the three arms. Median and 1-year PFS1 rates were 8.3, 1.8, 8.1 months and 49.9%, 36.4%, 25.0% for Arms A, B, C, respectively. Median and 1-year PFS2 rates were 26.3, 17.5, 8.1 months and 78.4%, 70.0%, 25% for Arms A, B, C, respectively. The most frequent adverse events were anemia, stomatitis, fatigue, hyperglycemia, and hypercholesterolemia., Conclusions: The combination of everolimus and pasireotide-LAR showed promising efficacy over single agent. The delayed combination of everolimus and pasireotide-LAR following progression on single agent everolimus appeared intriguing as a combination strategy.

Purpose: Dual inhibition of glucose and glutamine metabolism results in synergistic anticancer effects in solid tumor models. Telaglenastat, an investigational, small-molecule, glutaminase inhibitor, exhibits modest single-agent activity in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. This phase Ib trial evaluated telaglenastat plus cabozantinib or everolimus, agents known to impair glucose metabolism in patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC)., Patients and Methods: mRCC patients received escalating doses of telaglenastat [400-800 mg per os (p.o.) twice daily] in a 3 + 3 design, plus either everolimus (10 mg daily p.o.; TelaE) or cabozantinib (60 mg daily p.o.; TelaC). Tumor response (RECISTv1.1) was assessed every 8 weeks. Endpoints included safety (primary) and antitumor activity., Results: Twenty-seven patients received TelaE, 13 received TelaC, with median 2 and 3 prior therapies, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events were mostly grades 1 to 2, most common including decreased appetite, anemia, elevated transaminases, and diarrhea with TelaE, and diarrhea, decreased appetite, elevated transaminases, and fatigue with TelaC. One dose-limiting toxicity occurred per cohort: grade 3 pruritic rash with TelaE and thrombocytopenia with TelaC. No maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was reached for either combination, leading to a recommended phase II dose of 800-mg telaglenastat twice daily with standard doses of E or C. TelaE disease control rate (DCR; response rate + stable disease) was 95.2% [20/21, including 1 partial response (PR)] among 21 patients with clear cell histology and 66.7% (2/3) for papillary. TelaC DCR was 100% (12/12) for both histologies [5/10 PRs as best response (3 confirmed) in clear cell]., Conclusions: TelaE and TelaC showed encouraging clinical activity and tolerability in heavily pretreated mRCC patients., (©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Retrospective studies have suggested a potential risk of hyperprogressive disease (HPD) in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We compared the incidence of HPD during treatment with nivolumab±ipilimumab versus natural tumor progression with placebo in post hoc analyses of two randomized, double-blind clinical trials., Methods: ATTRACTION-2 randomized patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) and progression on ≥2 prior regimens to nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W or placebo. CheckMate 451 randomized patients with extensive-disease small cell lung cancer (ED SCLC) and ongoing complete/partial response or stable disease after first-line chemotherapy to nivolumab 240 mg Q2W, nivolumab 1 mg/kg+ipilimumab 3 mg/kg Q3W for four doses then nivolumab 240 mg Q2W, or placebo. Patients receiving ≥1 dose of study drug and with tumor scans at baseline and the first on-treatment evaluation were included in the HPD analyses. HPD definitions were ≥20%, ≥50%, and ≥100% increase in target lesion sum of the longest diameters (SLD) at the first on-treatment assessment., Results: In the ATTRACTION-2 HPD-evaluable population, 243 patients received nivolumab and 115 placebo. Fewer patients receiving nivolumab versus placebo had increases in SLD ≥20% (33.7% vs 46.1%) and ≥50% (6.2% vs 11.3%); similar proportions had increases in SLD ≥100% (1.6% vs 1.7%). In the CheckMate 451 HPD-evaluable population, 177 patients received nivolumab, 179 nivolumab+ipilimumab, and 175 placebo. Fewer patients receiving nivolumab or nivolumab+ipilimumab versus placebo had increases in SLD ≥20% (27.1%, 27.4% vs 45.7%), ≥50% (10.2%, 11.2% vs 22.3%), and ≥100% (2.8%, 2.8% vs 6.3%)., Conclusions: Nivolumab±ipilimumab was not associated with an increased rate of progression versus placebo in patients with GC, GEJC, or ED SCLC, suggesting that previous reports of HPD may reflect the natural disease course in some patients rather than ICI-mediated progression., Trial Registration Number: NCT02538666; NCT02267343., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Y-KK received honoraria for consultancy from ALX Oncology, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, DAE HWA, MacroGenics, Novartis, Surface Oncology, and Zymeworks. MR received honoraria for lectures and consultancy from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mirati, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Samsung. PN served as a paid consultant to EMD Serono and Pfizer; his institution received research support from Bristol Myers Squibb and EMD Serono. YF was employed by Bristol Myers Squibb at the time of manuscript preparation and owns Bristol Myers Squibb stock. HRK declares no conflicts of interest. TKO served as a paid consultant to Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech, Novartis, BeiGene, Lilly, and Oncocyte. His institution received grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech, and Novartis. NB received honoraria for lectures from Ono and Taiho and received research funding from Ono and Takeda. L-TC is employed by Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, and the National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes in Taiwan, received honoraria to their institution from PharmaEngine, Taivex, and OBI, received research grants to their institution from SynCore Biotechnology, TTY, Polaris, ACT Genomics, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, and Merck Serono, served as a paid consultant to ONO, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Ipsen, TTY, SynCore Biotechnology, Novartis, AstraZeneca, and Stone, reports royalties by HuniLife, and is part of the board of directors of ScinoPharm Taiwan, Ltd. AB, HC, ML, WHL, GP, AR, and JS are employees of Bristol Myers Squibb and own Bristol Myers Squibb stock., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Treatment of EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with mutation-selective third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) such as osimertinib has achieved remarkable success in the clinic. However, the immediate challenge is the emergence of acquired resistance, limiting the long-term remission of patients. This study suggests a novel strategy to overcome acquired resistance to osimertinib and other third-generation EGFR-TKIs through directly targeting the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. We found that osimertinib, when combined with Mcl-1 inhibition or Bax activation, synergistically decreased the survival of different osimertinib-resistant cell lines, enhanced the induction of intrinsic apoptosis, and inhibited the growth of osimertinib-resistant tumor in vivo. Interestingly, the triple-combination of osimertinib with Mcl-1 inhibition and Bax activation exhibited the most potent activity in decreasing the survival and inducing apoptosis of osimertinib-resistant cells and in suppressing the growth of osimertinib-resistant tumors. These effects were associated with increased activation of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway evidenced by augmented mitochondrial cytochrome C and Smac release. Hence, this study convincingly demonstrates a novel strategy for overcoming acquired resistance to osimertinib and other 3rd generation EGFR-TKIs by targeting activation of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway through Mcl-1 inhibition, Bax activation or both, warranting further clinical validation of this strategy., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Emergence of acquired resistance to osimertinib (AZD9291), the first-approved third-generation EGFR inhibitor that selectively and irreversibly inhibits the activating EGFR mutations and the resistant T790M mutation, is a giant and urgent clinical challenge. Fully understanding the biology underlying the response of EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to osimertinib is the foundation for development of mechanism-driven strategies to overcome acquired resistance to osimertinib or other third-generation EGFR inhibitors. This study focused on tackling this important issue by elucidating the critical role of sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 (SREBP1) degradation in conferring the response of EGFR mutant NSCLC cells to osimertinib and by validating the strategy via directly targeting SREBP1 for overcoming osimertinib acquired resistance. Osimertinib facilitated degradation of the mature form of SREBP1 (mSREBP1) in a GSK3/FBXW7-dependent manner and reduced protein levels of its regulated genes in EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells/tumors accompanied with suppression of lipogenesis. Once resistant, EGFR-mutant NSCLC cell lines possessed elevated levels of mSREBP1, which were resistant to osimertinib modulation. Both genetic and pharmacological inhibition of SREBP1 sensitized osimertinib-resistant cells and tumors to osimertinib primarily through enhancing Bim-dependent induction of apoptosis, whereas enforced expression of ectopic SREBP1 in sensitive EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells compromised osimertinib's cell-killing effects. Collectively, we have demonstrated a novel connection between osimertinib and SREBP1 degradation and its impact on the response of EGFR mutant NSCLC cells to osimertinib and suggested an effective strategy for overcoming acquired resistance to osimertinib, and possibly other EGFR inhibitors, via targeting SREBP1., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Second-line treatment options for patients with relapsed, extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) are limited, and even with currently available treatments, prognosis remains poor. Until recently, topotecan (a topoisomerase I inhibitor) was the only drug approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the management of ES-SCLC following progression after first-line treatment with etoposide plus a platinum derivative (EP; carboplatin preferred). With the most recent approval of EP plus a programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor, there are now more therapeutic options for managing ES-SCLC. A number of novel agents have emerging data for activity in relapsed ES-SCLC, and single-agent lurbinectedin (an alkylating drug and selective inhibitor of oncogenic transcription and DNA repair machinery in tumor cells) has conditional FDA approval for use in this patient population. Trilaciclib, a short-acting cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitor, has also been recently approved as a supportive intervention for use prior to an EP or a topotecan-containing regimen to diminish the incidence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression. The current review is based on a recent expert roundtable discussion and summarizes current therapeutic agents and emerging data on newer agents and biomarkers. It also provides evidence-based clinical considerations and a treatment decision tool for oncologists treating patients with relapsed ES-SCLC. This paper discusses the importance of various factors to consider when selecting a second-line treatment option, including prior first-line treatment, available second-line treatment options, tumor platinum sensitivity, and patient characteristics (such as performance status, comorbidities, and patient-expressed and perceived values)., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: The use of molecular testing in oncology is rapidly expanding. The aim of this study was to determine how oncologists describe molecular testing and whether patients understand the terminology being used., Materials and Methods: Sixty conversations between oncologists and patients about molecular testing were observed, and the used technical terms were noted by the researcher. Patients were interviewed post-conversation to assess their understanding of the noted technical terms. A patient understanding score was calculated for each participant. Comparisons of the terms were conducted using χ 2 tests, Fisher's exact tests, or ANOVA when appropriate., Results: Sixty-one unique technical terms were used by oncologists, to describe seven topics. "Mutation" was a challenging term for patients to understand with 48.8% (21/43 mentions) of participants correctly defining the term. "Genetic testing" and "Gene" were understood a little more than half the time (53.3%; 8/15 and 56.4%; 22/39 respectively). "DNA" was well understood (80%; 12/15). There was no correlation between the terms being defined by the oncologist in the conversation, and the likelihood of the patient providing a correct definition. White participants were significantly more likely to understand both "mutation" and "genetic testing" than non-White participants. Forty-two percent (n = 25) of participants had an understanding score below 50%, and a higher family income was significantly correlated with a higher score., Conclusion: Our results show that oncologists use variable terminology to describe molecular testing, which is often not understood. Because oncologists defining the terms did not correlate with understanding, it is imperative to develop new, improved methods to explain molecular testing., Implications for Practice: The use of molecular testing is expanding in oncology, yet little is known about how effectively clinicians are communicating information about molecular testing and whether patients understand the terminology used. The results of this study indicate that patients do not understand some of the terminology used by their clinicians and that clinicians tend to use highly variable terminology to describe molecular testing. These results highlight the need to develop and implement effective methods to explain molecular testing terminology to patients to ensure that patients have the tools to make autonomous and informed decisions about their treatment., (© 2021 AlphaMed Press.)

Expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) on cancer cells is a critical mechanism contributing to immunosuppression and immune escape. PD-L1 expression may also affect therapeutic outcomes of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapy (e.g., with osimertinib/AZD9291) against EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and can even be altered during the treatment albeit with largely undefined mechanisms. This study primarily focuses on elucidating the mechanism by which osimertinib induces PD-L1 degradation in addition to validating osimertinib's effect on decreasing PD-L1 expression in EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells and tumors. Osimertinib and other EGFR inhibitors effectively decreased PD-L1 levels primarily in EGFR-mutant NSCLCs and xenografted tumors. Osimertinib not only decreased PD-L1 mRNA expression, but also prompted proteasomal degradation of PD-L1 protein, indicating both transcriptional and posttranslational mechanisms accounting for osimertinib-induced reduction of PD-L1. Knockdown of β-TrCP or inhibition of GSK3 failed to prevent PD-L1 reduction induced by osimertinib. Rather, knockdown of membrane-associated RING-CH 8 ( MARCH8 ) that encodes a membrane-bound E3 ubiquitin ligase rescued osimertinib-induced PD-L1 reduction. Furthermore, manipulation of MARCH8 expression accordingly altered PD-L1 degradation rate. Critically, MARCH8 interacted with PD-L1 through its N-terminal region and also ubiquitinated PD-L1 in cells. Collectively, these results strongly suggest that MARCH8 is a previously undiscovered E3 ubiquitin ligase responsible for PD-L1 degradation including osimertinib-induced PD-L1 degradation, establishing a novel connection between MARCH8 and PD-L1 regulation. IMPLICATIONS: This study has demonstrated a previously undiscovered function of MARCH8 in mediating PD-L1 degradation induced by EGFR inhibitors in EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells, establishing a novel connection between MARCH8 and PD-L1 regulation., (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Osimertinib (AZD9291 or TAGRISSO) is a promising and approved third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR-activating mutations or the resistant T790M mutation. However, the inevitable emergence of acquired resistance limits its long-term efficacy. A fuller understanding of the mechanism of action of osimertinib and its linkage to acquired resistance will enable the development of more efficacious therapeutic strategies. Consequently, we have identified a novel connection between osimertinib or other EGFR-TKIs and c-Myc. Osimertinib rapidly and sustainably decreased c-Myc levels primarily via enhancing protein degradation in EGFR-mutant (EGFRm) NSCLC cell lines and xenograft tumors. c-Myc levels were substantially elevated in different EGFRm NSCLC cell lines with acquired resistance to osimertinib in comparison with their corresponding parental cell lines and could not be reduced any further by osimertinib. Consistently, c-Myc levels were elevated in the majority of EGFRm NSCLC tissues relapsed from EGFR-TKI treatment compared with their corresponding untreated baseline c-Myc levels. Suppression of c-Myc through knockdown or pharmacologic targeting with BET inhibitors restored the response of resistant cell lines to osimertinib. These findings indicate that c-Myc modulation mediates the therapeutic efficacy of osimertinib and the development of osimertinib acquired resistance. Furthermore, they establish c-Myc as a potential therapeutic target and warrant clinical testing of BET inhibition as a potential strategy to overcome acquired resistance to osimertinib or other EGFR inhibitors. SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrates a critical role of c-Myc modulation in mediating therapeutic efficacy of osimertinib including osimertinib acquired resistance and suggests targeting c-Myc as a potential strategy to overcome osimertinib acquired resistance., (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Imaging techniques based on fluorescence and bioluminescence have been important tools in visualizing tumor progression and studying the effect of drugs and immunotherapies on tumor immune microenvironment in animal models of cancer. However, transgenic expression of foreign proteins may induce immune responses in immunocompetent syngeneic tumor transplant models and augment the efficacy of experimental drugs. In this study, we show that the growth rate of Lewis lung carcinoma (LL/2) tumors was reduced after transduction of tdTomato and luciferase (tdTomato/Luc) compared to the parental cell line. tdTomato/Luc expression by LL/2 cells altered the tumor microenvironment by increasing tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) while inhibiting tumor-induced myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Interestingly, tdTomato/Luc expression did not alter the response of LL/2 tumors to anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. These results suggest that the use of tdTomato/Luc-transduced cancer cells to conduct studies in immune competent mice may lead to cell-extrinsic tdTomato/Luc-induced alterations in tumor growth and tumor immune microenvironment that need to be taken into consideration when evaluating the efficacy of anti-cancer drugs and vaccines in immunocompetent animal models., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Rationale: Bak is a major proapoptotic Bcl2 family member and a required molecule for apoptotic cell death. High levels of endogenous Bak were observed in both small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines. Increased Bak expression was correlated with poor prognosis of NSCLC patients, suggesting that Bak protein is an attractive target for lung cancer therapy. The BH3 domain functions as death domain and is required for Bak to initiate apoptotic cell death. Thus, the BH3 domain is attractive target for discovery of Bak agonist. Methods: The BH3 death domain binding pocket (aa75-88) of Bak was chosen as a docking site for screening of small molecule Bak activators using the UCSF DOCK 6.1 program suite and the NCI chemical library (300,000 small molecules) database. The top 500 compounds determined to have the highest affinity for the BH3 domain were obtained from the NCI and tested for cytotoxicity for further screening. We identified a small molecule Bak activator BKA-073 as the lead compound. The binding affinity of BKA-073 with Bak protein was analyzed by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) assay. BKA-073-mediated Bak activation via oligomerization was analyzed by a cross-linking with Bis (maleimido) hexane (BMH). Sensitivity of BKA-073 to lung cancer cells in vitro was evaluated by dynamic BH3 profiling (DBP) and apoptotic cell death assay. The potency of BKA-073 alone or in combination with radiotherapy or Bcl2 inhibitor was evaluated in animal models. Results: We found that BKA-073 binds Bak at BH3 domain with high affinity and selectivity. BKA-073/Bak binding promotes Bak oligomerization and mitochondrial priming that activates its proapoptotic function. BKA-073 potently suppresses tumor growth without significant normal tissue toxicity in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and NSCLC xenografts, patient-derived xenografts, and genetically engineered mouse models of mutant KRAS-driven cancer. Bak accumulates in radioresistant lung cancer cells and BKA-073 reverses radioresistance. Combination of BKA-073 with Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax exhibits strong synergy against lung cancer in vivo. Conclusions: Development of small molecule Bak activator may provide a new class of anticancer agents to treat lung cancer., Competing Interests: Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists., (© The author(s).)

Purpose: This study investigated the efficacy and safety of oral PARP inhibitor veliparib, plus carboplatin and etoposide in patients with treatment-naïve, extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC)., Patients and Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to veliparib [240 mg twice daily (BID) for 14 days] plus chemotherapy followed by veliparib maintenance (400 mg BID; veliparib throughout), veliparib plus chemotherapy followed by placebo (veliparib combination only), or placebo plus chemotherapy followed by placebo (control). Patients received 4-6 cycles of combination therapy, then maintenance until unacceptable toxicity/progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) with veliparib throughout versus control., Results: Overall ( N = 181), PFS was improved with veliparib throughout versus control [hazard ratio (HR), 0.67; 80% confidence interval (CI), 0.50-0.88; P = 0.059]; median PFS was 5.8 and 5.6 months, respectively. There was a trend toward improved PFS with veliparib throughout versus control in SLFN11-positive patients (HR, 0.6; 80% CI, 0.36-0.97). Median overall survival (OS) was 10.1 versus 12.4 months in the veliparib throughout and control arms, respectively (HR, 1.43; 80% CI, 1.09-1.88). Grade 3/4 adverse events were experienced by 82%, 88%, and 68% of patients in the veliparib throughout, veliparib combination-only and control arms, most commonly hematologic., Conclusions: Veliparib plus platinum chemotherapy followed by veliparib maintenance demonstrated improved PFS as first-line treatment for ED-SCLC with an acceptable safety profile, but there was no corresponding benefit in OS. Further investigation is warranted to define the role of biomarkers in this setting., (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Trilaciclib is a first-in-class CDK4/6 inhibitor that transiently arrests hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) in the G1 phase of the cell cycle to preserve them from chemotherapy-induced damage (myelopreservation). We report integrated analyses of preclinical and clinical data that informed selection of the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) used in trilaciclib trials in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC)., Methods: A semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model developed from preclinical data guided selection of an optimal dose for G1 bone marrow arrest in a first-in-human Phase I study (G1T28-1-01). PK, PD, safety, and efficacy data from G1T28-1-01 and two Phase Ib/IIa studies (G1T28-02/-03) in ES-SCLC were analyzed to support RP2D selection., Results: Model simulation of bone marrow arrest based on preclinical data predicted that a ≥ 192 mg/m 2 dose would induce a 40-50% decrease in total bone marrow proliferation in humans and almost 100% cell cycle arrest of cycling HSPCs. Consistent with this model, analysis of bone marrow aspirates in healthy volunteers after trilaciclib 192 mg/m 2 administration demonstrated almost 100% G1 arrest in HSPCs and 40% decrease in total bone marrow proliferation, with minimal toxicity. G1T28-02/-03 reported similar PK parameters with trilaciclib 200 mg/m 2 but slightly lower exposures than expected compared with healthy volunteers; consequently, 240 and 280 mg/m 2 doses were also tested to match healthy volunteer exposures. Based on PK and relevant safety data, 240 mg/m 2 was selected as the RP2D, which was also favored by myelopreservation endpoints in G1T28-02/-03., Conclusion: Integrated PK/PD, safety, and efficacy data support 240 mg/m 2 as the RP2D for trilaciclib. CLINICALTRIALS., Gov Identifiers: NCT02243150; NCT02499770; NCT02514447.

Purpose: This signal finding study (S1400G) was designed to evaluate the efficacy of talazoparib in advanced stage squamous cell lung cancer harboring homologous recombination repair deficiency., Patients and Methods: The full eligible population (FEP) had tumors with a deleterious mutation in any of the study-defined homologous recombination repair genes and without prior exposure to a PARP inhibitor. The primary analysis population (PAP) is a subset of FEP with alteration in ATM, ATR, BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2. Treatment consisted of talazoparib 1 mg daily continuously in 21-day cycles. A 2-stage design with exact 93% power and 1-sided 0.07 type I error required enrollment of 40 patients in the PAP in order to rule out an overall response rate (ORR) of 15% or less if the true ORR is ≥ 35%., Results: The study enrolled 47 patients in the FEP, of whom 24 were in the PAP. The median age for the FEP was 66.7 years; 83% were male and 85% white. ORR in the PAP was 4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0, 21) with disease control rate of 54% (95% CI, 33, 74). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.4 months (95% CI, 1.5-2.8) and 5.2 months (95% CI, 4.0-10), respectively. In the FEP, ORR was 11% (95% CI, 3.6, 23), the disease control rate was 51% (95% CI, 36, 66), and the median duration of response was 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.3, 4.2). Median progression-free and overall survival were 2.5 months and 5.7 months, respectively., Conclusions: S1400G failed to show sufficient level of efficacy for single agent talazoparib in a biomarker defined subset of squamous lung cancer with homologous recombination repair deficiency., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: In extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC), response rates to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy are robust, but responses lack durability. CheckMate 451, a double-blind phase III trial, evaluated nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab monotherapy as maintenance therapy following first-line chemotherapy for ED-SCLC., Methods: Patients with ED-SCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, and no progression after ≤ 4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks for 12 weeks followed by nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks, nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks, or placebo for ≤ 2 years or until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was overall survival (OS) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus placebo. Secondary end points were hierarchically tested., Results: Overall, 834 patients were randomly assigned. The minimum follow-up was 8.9 months. OS was not significantly prolonged with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.12; P = .37; median, 9.2 v 9.6 months). The HR for OS with nivolumab versus placebo was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.02); the median OS for nivolumab was 10.4 months. Progression-free survival HRs versus placebo were 0.72 for nivolumab plus ipilimumab (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.87) and 0.67 for nivolumab (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.81). A trend toward OS benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab was observed in patients with tumor mutational burden ≥ 13 mutations per megabase. Rates of grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were nivolumab plus ipilimumab (52.2%), nivolumab (11.5%), and placebo (8.4%)., Conclusion: Maintenance therapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab did not prolong OS for patients with ED-SCLC who did not progress on first-line chemotherapy. There were no new safety signals., Competing Interests: Taofeek K. OwonikokoStock and Other Ownership Interests: Cambium Medical TechnologiesConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Celgene, Lilly, Sandoz, Abbvie, Eisai, G1 Therapeutics, Takeda, Seattle Genetics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MedImmune, BerGenBio, Amgen, AstraZeneca, PharmaMar, Boehringer Ingelheim, EMD Serono, Xcovery, Bayer, Heron Pharmaceutical, ARMO BioSciences, MerckSpeakers' Bureau: AbbvieResearch Funding: Novartis, Astellas Pharma, Celgene, Bayer, Stem CentRx, Regeneron, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Abbvie, G1 Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Corvus Pharmaceuticals, United Therapeutics, Amgen, Loxo/Lilly, Fujifilm, Pfizer, Aeglea Biotherapeutics, Incyte, MerckPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Overcoming acquired resistance to chemotherapy treatments through suppression of STAT3, Selective chemotherapy treatments and diagnostic methods related thereto, DR4 modulation and its implications in EGFR-target cancer therapy ref:18089 PROV (CSP) United States patent application no. 62/670,210 June 26, 2018 (Co-Inventor), Soluble FAS ligand as a biomarker of recurrence in thyroid cancer; provisional patent 61/727,519 (Inventor)Other Relationship: Roche/Genentech, EMD SeronoUncompensated Relationships: Reflexion Medical Keunchil ParkConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Blueprint Medicines, Amgen, Merck KGaA, LOXO, Abbvie, Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, JNJ, Eisai, Puma BiotechnologySpeakers' Bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, AZDResearch Funding: AstraZeneca, MSD Oncology Ramaswamy GovindanHonoraria: Genentech/Abbvie, Abbvie, GeneplusConsulting or Advisory Role: GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech/Roche, Abbvie, Celgene, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Merck Serono, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Lilly, Ignyta, Nektar, Phillips Gilmore Oncology, Jounce Therapeutics, Roche, Janssen, Amgen, Achilles Therapeutics Neal ReadyConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Merck, Abbvie, Celgene, Merck Serono, AstraZeneca, G1 Therapeutics, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, RemeronSpeakers' Bureau: Bristol-Myers SquibbResearch Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Martin ReckConsulting or Advisory Role: Lilly, MSD Oncology, Merck Serono, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche/Genentech, Abbvie, Amgen, Mirati Therapeutics, Samsung BioepisSpeakers' Bureau: Roche/Genentech, Lilly, MSD Oncology, Merck Serono, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Pfizer, Novartis, Amgen, Mirati Therapeutics Solange PetersHonoraria: Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, AstraZeneca, Takeda, IlluminaConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, MSD, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Regeneron, Merck Serono, Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda, Lilly, Abbvie, Bayer, Biocartis, Debiopharm Group, Illumina, PharmaMar, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Blueprint Medicines, Daiichi Sankyo, Incyte, Bioinvent, Clovis Oncology, VaccibodyResearch Funding: Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Amgen, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Illumina, Merck Serono, Novartis, Biodesix, Boehringer Ingelheim, Iovance BiotherapeuticsTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Sanofi, IncyteUncompensated Relationships: Journal of Thoracic Oncology, ESMO, European Thoracic Oncology Platform (ETOP), Annals on Oncology associate editor Alejandro NavarroHonoraria: Pfizer, Roche, AstraZenecaConsulting or Advisory Role: Boehringer IngelheimExpert Testimony: Oryzon Genomics, MedsirTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer Jerónimo Rodríguez-CidConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb (Mexico), MSD Oncology, Takeda, BayerSpeakers' Bureau: MSD Oncology, Bristol-Myers Squibb (Mexico), Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Bayer, Lilly, AstraZenecaResearch Funding: MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb (Mexico), Roche, Celltrion, Lilly, BeiGene, AstraZenecaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, MSD Oncology, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Michael SchenkerResearch Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Amgen, MSD, Pfizer/EMD Serono, Lilly, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Regeneron, Novartis, Abbvie, Gilead SciencesTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb Jong-Seok LeeConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical Ivor PercentConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Abbvie, Takeda, PharmaMar, Gilead Sciences, G1 TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Heat Biologics, Merck, Celgene, AstraZeneca, Baxter, Incyte, Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, EpicentRx, Pfizer, Roche, Lilly, Altum Pharmaceuticals, Array BioPharma Carlos H. BarriosStock and Other Ownership Interests: Biomarker, MedSIR, TummiHonoraria: Novartis, Roche/Genentech, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eisai, MSD, Lilly, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Zodiac PharmaConsulting or Advisory Role: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche/Genentech, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Eisai, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Libbs, MSD Oncology, United Medical, LillyResearch Funding: Pfizer, Novartis, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche/Genentech, Lilly, Sanofi, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Mylan, Merrimack, Merck, Abbvie, Astellas Pharma, Biomarin, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Abraxis BioScience, AB Science, Asana Biosciences, Medivation, Exelixis, ImClone Systems, LEO Pharma, Millennium, Janssen, Clinica Atlantis, INC Research, Halozyme, Covance, Celgene, inVentiv Health, Merck KGaA, Shanghai Henlius Biotech, Polyphor, PharmaMarTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche/Genentech, Novartis, Pfizer, BMS Brazil, AstraZeneca, MSD Oncology, Lilly Laurent GreillierHonoraria: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Takeda, Abbvie, Novartis, PfizerConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, MSD, AstraZeneca, Abbvie, NovartisTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, MSD Sofia BakaConsulting or Advisory Role: MSD Oncology, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, NovartisResearch Funding: Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, MSD Oncology, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Takeda, Genesis PharmaceuticalsTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Demo Pharmaceutical Wen Hong LinEmployment: Bristol-Myers Squibb Giovanni SelvaggiEmployment: Xcovery Holdings IncOther Relationship: Xcovery Holdings Inc Christine BaudeletEmployment: Bristol-Myers SquibbStock and Other Ownership Interests: Bristol-Myers Squibb Jonathan BadenEmployment: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson & JohnsonStock and Other Ownership Interests: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson Dimple PandyaEmployment: Bristol-Myers SquibbStock and Other Ownership Interests: Bristol-Myers SquibbPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Bristol-Myers Squibb Parul DoshiEmployment: Bristol-Myers SquibbStock and Other Ownership Interests: Bristol-Myers SquibbTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb Hye Ryun KimSpeakers' Bureau: Ono Pharmaceutical, Roche/GenentechNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Background: Lung metastases may worsen overall survival (OS) in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC). We investigated (post hoc) the impact of lung metastases on survival in SELECT (a phase 3 study)., Patients and Methods: 392 patients with RR-DTC were randomised 2:1 to lenvatinib 24 mg daily (n = 261) or placebo (n = 131). Placebo-treated patients could crossover to open-label lenvatinib following progression. Patients were grouped by size of baseline lung metastases. Safety/efficacy outcomes, collated by these lung-metastases subgroups, were generated., Results: Lenvatinib-treated population distributions per baseline lung metastases subgroup were any lung metastases (target/nontarget lesions; n = 226), and by maximum size of target lung lesions ≥1.0 cm (n = 199), ≥1.5 cm (n = 150), ≥2.0 cm (n = 94) and <2.0 cm (n = 105). In patients with any lung metastases, no statistically significant difference in OS was observed between treatment arms (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.57-1.01; P = 0.0549). Median OS for lung metastases of ≥1.0 cm was 44.7 months (lenvatinib) versus 33.1 months (placebo) (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.47-0.85; P = 0.0025). OS was significantly prolonged with lenvatinib versus placebo among patients with lung metastases of ≥1.0 cm, ≥1.5 cm, ≥2.0 cm and <2.0 cm; median OS was shorter in the ≥2.0 cm subgroup (lenvatinib: 34.7 months) versus other subgroups (lenvatinib: 44.1-49.2 months). Multivariate analysis demonstrated lenvatinib significantly prolonged OS in patients with lung metastases of ≥1.0 cm after adjustment for baseline characteristics., Conclusions: Lenvatinib treatment resulted in longer OS in patients with lung metastases of ≥1.0 cm versus placebo (even with the 89% crossover rate). Early initiation of lenvatinib may improve outcomes in patients with RR-DTC and lung metastases of ≥1.0 cm., Source Study Registration: ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier: NCT01321554., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: MT: Honoraria from Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Merck Serono, Takeda; consulting or advisory role with Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer; research funding from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eisai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, NanoCarrier, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer. NK: Honoraria from Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Bayer; research funding from Eisai, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb. AOH: Research funding from Eisai, Bayer, Eli Lilly, Exelixis; consulting or advisory role with Bayer, Eli Lilly. CB: Nothing to disclose. TKO: Research funding from Novartis, Astellas, Celgene, Bayer, Stemcentrx, Regeneron, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, AbbVie, G1 Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Corvus Pharmaceuticals, United Therapeutics, Amgen, Loxo/Lilly, Fujifilm, Pfizer, Aeglea Biotherapeutics, Incyte, Merck; consulting or advisory role with Novartis, Celgene, Lilly, Sandoz, AbbVie, Eisai, G1 Therapeutics, Takeda, Seattle Genetics, Bristol Myers Squibb, MedImmune, BerGenBio, Amgen, AstraZeneca, PharmaMar, Boehringer Ingelheim, EMD Serono, Xcovery, Bayer, Heron Pharmaceutical, ARMO BioSciences; IRC/DSMB for EMD Serono, Roche/Genentech; stock ownership with Cambium Oncology. CED: Employee of Eisai Inc. TS: Employee of Eisai Co. Ltd. MR: Employee of Eisai Inc. LW: Consulting or advisory role for Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Cue Biopharma, Eisai, Exelixis Lilly, Loxo Oncology, Merck, and Rakuten Medical., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide, with few treatment options. Rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T) is an antibody-drug conjugate that targets delta-like 3 on SCLC cells to deliver a cytotoxic payload directly to tumor cells. In this study, the cardiac safety profile of Rova-T was assessed by evaluating changes in QT interval, electrocardiogram (ECG) waveform, heart rate, and proarrhythmic adverse events (AEs) after treatment with Rova-T in patients with previously treated extensive-stage SCLC. Patients underwent ECG monitoring for 2 weeks after each of 2 i.v. infusions of 0.3 mg/kg Rova-T over 30 minutes, administered 6 weeks apart. Forty-six patients received at least one dose of Rova-T. At the geometric mean Rova-T maximum serum concentration of 7,940 ng/mL, ECG monitoring showed no significant changes in the Fridericia-corrected QT (QTcF) interval; the upper limit of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval did not exceed 10 msec for any time point. There were no clinically significant changes in QRS or PR intervals, ECG waveforms, or heart rate after Rova-T administration. All patients experienced a treatment-emergent AE (TEAE); 78% had a grade ≥ 3 TEAE, 59% had a serious TEAE, and 41% had a cardiac-related TEAE. The TEAEs that might signal proarrhythmia tendencies were uncommon. Confirmed partial responses were observed in 24% of patients. Based on the evaluation of ECG data collected in this study from patients treated with Rova-T at 0.3 mg/kg i.v. administered every 6 weeks, a QTcF effect of clinical concern can be excluded., (© 2020 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Introduction: The clinical and biological significance of the newly described SCLC subtypes, SCLC-A, SCLC-N, SCLC-Y, and SCLC-P, defined by the dominant expression of transcription factors ASCL1, NeuroD1, YAP1, and POU2F3, respectively, remain to be established., Methods: We generated new RNA sequencing expression data from a discovery set of 59 archival tumor samples of neuroendocrine tumors and new protein expression data by immunohistochemistry in 99 SCLC cases. We validated the findings from this discovery set in two independent validation sets consisting of RNA sequencing data generated from 51 SCLC cell lines and 81 primary human SCLC samples., Results: We successfully classified 71.8% of SCLC and 18.5% of carcinoid cases in our discovery set into one of the four SCLC subtypes. Gene set enrichment analysis for differentially expressed genes between the SCLC survival outliers (top and bottom deciles) matched for clinically relevant prognostic factors revealed substantial up-regulation of interferon-γ response genes in long-term survivors. The SCLC-Y subtype was associated with high expression of interferon-γ response genes, highest weighted score on a validated 18-gene T-cell-inflamed gene expression profile score, and high expression of HLA and T-cell receptor genes. YAP1 protein expression was more prevalent and more intensely expressed in limited-stage versus extensive-stage SCLC (30.6% versus 8.5%; p = 0.0058) indicating good prognosis for the SCLC-Y subtype. We replicated the inflamed phenotype of SCLC-Y in the two independent validation data sets from the SCLC cell lines and tumor samples., Conclusions: SCLC subtyping using transcriptional signaling holds clinical relevance with the inflamed phenotype associated with the SCLC-Y subset., (Copyright © 2020 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evidence-based medicine, they do not always reflect real-world patient populations, limiting their generalizability and external validity. Real-world evidence (RWE), generated during routine clinical practice, is increasingly important in determining effectiveness outside of the tightly controlled conditions of RCTs, and is now recognized by regulatory bodies as a valuable complement to RCTs. Consequently, it is increasingly important for physicians to understand how RWE data can be used alongside clinical trial data. Here, we discuss the different types of real-world observational studies, outline the benefits and limitations of RWE, and, using examples from EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer, outline how RWE can be used to help inform treatment decisions.

Death receptor 4 (DR4), a cell surface receptor, mediates apoptosis or induces inflammatory cytokine secretion upon binding to its ligand depending on cell contexts. Its prognostic impact in lung cancer and connection between EGFR-targeted therapy and DR4 modulation has not been reported and thus was the focus of this study. Methods: Intracellular protein alterations were measured by Western blotting. Cell surface protein was detected with antibody staining and flow cytometry. mRNA expression was monitored with qRT-PCR. Gene transactivation was analyzed with promoter reporter assay. Drug dynamic effects in vivo were evaluated using xenografts. Gene modulations were achieved with gene overexpression and knockdown. Proteins in human archived tissues were stained with immunohistochemistry. Results: EGFR inhibitors (e.g., osimertinib) decreased DR4 levels only in EGFR mutant NSCLC cells and tumors, being tightly associated with induction of apoptosis. This modulation was lost once cells became resistant to these inhibitors. Increased levels of DR4 were detected in cell lines with acquired osimertinib resistance and in NSCLC tissues relapsed from EGFR-targeted therapy. DR4 knockdown induced apoptosis and augmented apoptosis when combined with osimertinib in both sensitive and resistant cell lines, whereas enforced DR4 expression significantly attenuated osimertinib-induced apoptosis. Mechanistically, osimertinib induced MARCH8-mediated DR4 proteasomal degradation and suppressed MEK/ERK/AP-1-dependent DR4 transcription, resulting in DR4 downregulation. Moreover, we found that DR4 positive expression in human lung adenocarcinoma was significantly associated with poor patient survival. Conclusions: Collectively, we suggest that DR4 downregulation is coupled to therapeutic efficacy of EGFR-targeted therapy and predicts improved prognosis, revealing a previously undiscovered connection between EGFR-targeted therapy and DR4 modulation., Competing Interests: Competing Interests: SSR is on consulting/advisory boards for AstraZeneca, BMS, Merck, Roche, Tesaro and Amgen. TKO is on consulting/advisory boards for Novartis, Celgene, Lilly, Sandoz, Abbvie, Eisai, Takeda, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MedImmune, Amgen, AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim. Other authors disclose no potential conflicts of interest., (© The author(s).)

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease with dismal survival rates and limited therapeutic options. SCLC development is strongly associated with exposure to tobacco carcinogens. However, additional genetic and environmental risk factors that contribute to SCLC pathogenesis are beginning to emerge. Here, we specifically assess disparities pertaining to SCLC in Black populations. In contrast to non-small cell lung cancer, preliminary data suggest that Black individuals may actually be at a lower risk of developing SCLC relative to white individuals. This difference remains unexplained but urgently needs to be verified in larger data sets, because it could provide important new insights and approaches to understanding this recalcitrant tumor. Importantly, little biological information exists on SCLC in Black individuals, and few patient-derived preclinical SCLC models from diverse ancestries are available in the laboratory. Unfortunately, we note strikingly low numbers of Black participants in clinical trials testing new treatments for SCLC. Evidence further indicates that care for patients with SCLC may vary between communities with a large fraction of Black patients and those without. Together, these observations underscore the need to better investigate genetic, environmental, and socioeconomic factors associated with SCLC development, preclinical research, clinical care, and outcomes., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Introduction: Multilineage myelosuppression is an acute toxicity of cytotoxic chemotherapy, resulting in serious complications and dose modifications. Current therapies are lineage specific and administered after chemotherapy damage has occurred. Trilaciclib is a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor that is administered prior to chemotherapy to preserve hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and immune system function during chemotherapy (myelopreservation)., Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial, patients with previously treated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) were randomized to receive intravenous trilaciclib 240 mg/m 2 or placebo before topotecan 1.5 mg/m 2 on days 1-5 of each 21-day cycle. Primary endpoints were duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) in cycle 1 and occurrence of severe neutropenia (SN). Additional endpoints were prespecified to further assess the effect of trilaciclib on myelopreservation, safety, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and antitumor efficacy., Results: Thirty-two patients received trilaciclib, and 29 patients received placebo. Compared with placebo, administration of trilaciclib prior to topotecan resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful decreases in DSN in cycle 1 (mean [standard deviation] 2 [3.9] versus 7 [6.2] days; adjusted one-sided P < 0.0001) and occurrence of SN (40.6% versus 75.9%; adjusted one-sided P = 0.016), with numerical improvements in additional neutrophil, red blood cell, and platelet measures. Patients receiving trilaciclib had fewer grade ≥ 3 hematologic adverse events than patients receiving placebo, particularly neutropenia (75.0% versus 85.7%) and anemia (28.1% versus 60.7%). Myelopreservation benefits extended to improvements in PROs, specifically in those related to fatigue. Antitumor efficacy was comparable between treatment arms., Conclusions: Compared with placebo, the addition of trilaciclib prior to topotecan for the treatment of patients with previously treated ES-SCLC improves the patient experience of receiving chemotherapy, as demonstrated by a reduction in chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression, improved safety profile, improved quality of life and no detrimental effects on antitumor efficacy., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02514447.

Resveratrol (RES) is a naturally occurring polyphenol found in fruits, green leafy vegetables, and peanuts. This versatile compound, which has potent regenerative, anti-oxidative, and cancer-fighting properties, is produced in plants, particularly in response to stress stimuli. By various mechanisms, including regulation of genes and proteins, RES inhibits the growth of pathogenic bacteria and the development of cancers. The gut has a prominent role in nutrient assimilation, metabolism, immunity, and cancer regression, and the endogenous microbiome protects the host from invasive bacteria that facilitate the progression of various diseases. Short-chain fatty acids (SFCAs) are the byproducts of microbial fermentation in the gastrointestinal tract. Native microflora regulates internal homeostasis, influence the activity of host immune cells, and regress some cancers via the action of SCFAs produced from a plant-based diet. This review shows the relevance of dietary constituents and gut microbial activity in ensuring optimal health of the host.

Background: Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) targeting programmed cell death protein 1 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 has achieved modest clinical activity as salvage therapy in relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We conducted this signal-finding study to assess the efficacy of ICB with or without radiation in relapsed SCLC., Methods: Patients with relapsed SCLC and ≤2 previous lines of therapy were randomized to (1) arm A: durvalumab (D) 1500 mg/tremelimumab (T) 75 mg (intravenously every 4 weeks without stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)) or (2) arm B: immune-sensitizing SBRT to one selected tumor site (9 Gy × 3 fractions) followed by D/T. Treatment continued until progression or a maximum of 12 months. The co-primary endpoints of the study were overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). We evaluated circulating lymphocyte repertoire in serial peripheral blood samples and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) from on-treatment biopsies as pharmacodynamic markers., Results: Eighteen patients were randomized to arms A and B (n=9 each): median age 70 years; 41.2% women. The median PFS and ORR were 2.1 months and 0% in arm A and 3.3 months and 28.6% in arm B. The median overall survival (OS) was 2.8 months in arm A and 5.7 months in arm B (p=0.3772). Pooled efficacy of D/T±SBRT in 15 Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) evaluable patients across both arms showed the best ORR in terms of partial response in 13.3%, stable disease in 26.6% and progressive disease in 60.0%; the overall median PFS and OS were 2.76 and 3.9 months. The most common adverse events were grade 1 fatigue (66%) and grade 1 elevated amylase (56%) in arm A, and grade 1 fatigue (56%) and pain (44%) in arm B. There was a significant increase in activated CD8(+)ICOS+ T cells (p=0.048) and a reduction in naïve T cells (p=0.0454) in peripheral blood following treatment, along with a significant amount of activated CD8+ICOS+ T cells in TILs from responders., Conclusions: The D/T combination with and without SBRT was safe but did not show sufficient efficacy signal in relapsed SCLC. Changes in peripheral blood lymphocyte and TILs were consistent with an immunologic response. Trial registration number NCT02701400., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AstraZeneca provided funding for this study and is manufacturing the products being evaluated in the research described in this paper. TKO and KH served as paid consultants to AstraZeneca and personally received compensation for these services. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by Emory University in accordance with its conflict of interest policies., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: The emergence of acquired resistance to the third generation EGFR inhibitor, osimertinib (AZD9291 or TAGRISSO™), is an unavoidable huge clinical challenge. The involvement of ACK1, a non-receptor tyrosine kinase with an oncogenic function, in regulating cell response to osimertinib has not been investigated and thus is the focus of this study., Material and Methods: Drug effects on cell growth were evaluated by measuring cell numbers and colony formation. Apoptosis was monitored with flow cytometry for annexin V-positive cells and Western blotting for protein cleavage. Intracellular protein and mRNA alterations were detected with Western blotting and qRT-PCR, respectively. Drug effects on delaying osimertinib acquired resistance were determined using colony formation in vitro and xenografts in nude mice in vivo, respectively. Cell senescence was assayed by β-galactosidase staining., Results: Inhibition of ACK1 with the novel ACK1 inhibitor, (R)-9b synergized with osimertinib in inhibiting the growth of EGFR mutant NSCLC cell lines. Similar results were also generated with ACK1 gene knockdown. The combination of osimertinib and (R)-9b enhanced induction of apoptosis. In both in vitro and in vivo long-term resistance delay assays, the combination of (R)-9b and osimertinib clearly delayed the emergence of osimertinib-resistance. Further, the (R)-9b and osimertinib combination was also effective in inhibiting the growth of EGFR mutant NSCLC cell lines with acquired resistance to osimertinib, which possess elevated levels of ACK1, and the growth of osimertinib-resistant tumors in vivo. In some resistant cell lines, the combinations induced senescence in addition to induction of apoptosis., Conclusions: These novel findings suggest that ACK1 inhibition might be a potential and innovative strategy for delaying and overcoming osimertinb acquired resistance., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: To the authors' knowledge, race-based differences in efficacy for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have not been studied to date due to the underrepresentation of patients of minority backgrounds in pivotal trials. In the current study, the authors examined real-world differences in outcome in a diverse patient population., Methods: The authors retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with single-agent immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) between 2013 and July 2018 at Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia. Primary efficacy comparison between Black patients and White patients was performed using bivariate and multivariate analyses for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS)., Results: Data from 257 patients were analyzed. The median age of the patients was 69 years; 50.6% of the patients were female, 63.4% were White, 29.5% were Black, and 7.1% of the patients were of "other" race. ICB was the first-line treatment in 51 patients (19.9%), the second-line treatment in 161 patients (62.6%), and the third-line treatment in 33 patients (12.9%). The most commonly used agents were nivolumab (49.0%), pembrolizumab (25.2%), and atezolizumab (21.3%). No differences with regard to OS (P = .839) and PFS (P = .235) were noted between Black and White patients. The sample overall response rate was 20.6% (15.2% in Black patients and 23.1% in White patients). No differences with regard to OS (P = .081) and PFS (P = .176) were observed between female and male patients. The rate of immune-related adverse events was found to be similar in Black and White patients (20.0% vs 29.9%; P = .148). On multivariate analysis, race was not found to be significantly associated with OS or PFS., Conclusions: Real-world analysis of the authors' institutional experience demonstrated similar efficacy and tolerability of ICB in Black versus White patients with advanced NSCLC. Larger multi-institutional studies including other US minority populations would make the findings of the current study more generalizable., (© 2020 American Cancer Society.)

Purpose: On the basis of synergistic effects between green tea polyphenon E (PPE) and EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor in preclinical studies, we conducted a phase Ib study of the PPE and erlotinib combination in patients with advanced premalignant lesions (APL) of the oral cavity and larynx., Patients and Methods: Patients were treated with a fixed dose of PPE (200 mg three times a day) and dose escalation of erlotinib (50, 75, 100 mg daily) for 6 months with tissue biopsy at baseline and 6 months. Primary endpoints were safety and toxicity; secondary endpoints were evaluation of pathologic response, cancer-free survival (CFS), overall survival (OS), and biomarker modulation., Results: Among 21 enrolled patients, 19 began treatment and 17 completed 6 months of treatment with PPE and erlotinib. Main characteristics of treated patients: 15 severe dysplasia or carcinoma in situ and 17 oral cavity. Only skin rash was associated with dose-limiting toxicity and MTD. Recommended doses for phase II studies are PPE 600 mg daily plus erlotinib 100 mg daily for 6 months. Pathologic responses in 17 evaluable patients: pathologic complete response (47%) and pathologic partial response (18%). The 5-year CFS and OS were 66.3% and 93%, respectively. Among tested biomarkers, only phosphorylated ERK was correlated with response to treatment., Conclusions: Treatment with PPE and erlotinib combination was well tolerated in patients with APLs of the head and neck, and showed a high rate of pathologic response with excellent CFS. This combination deserves further investigation for the chemoprevention and/or prevention of second primary tumors in early-stage head and neck cancer., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Immunotherapy has dramatically changed the treatment landscape for patients with cancer. Programmed death-ligand 1/programmed death-1 checkpoint inhibitors have been in the forefront of this clinical revolution. Currently, there are 6 US Food and Drug Administration-approved checkpoint inhibitors for approximately 18 different histologic types of cancer. Lung cancer and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are 2 diseases that have led the way in the development of immunotherapy. Atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab are all currently used as part of standard-of-care treatment for different stages of lung cancer. Similarly, nivolumab and pembrolizumab have US regulatory approval as treatment for advanced metastatic HNSCC. This is significant because lung cancer represents the most common and most fatal cancer globally, and HNSCC is the sixth most common. Currently, most of the approvals for the use of immunotherapy agents are for patients diagnosed in the metastatic setting. However, research is ongoing to evaluate these drugs in earlier stage disease. There is plausible biological rationale to expect that pharmacologic activation of the immune system will be effective for early-stage and smaller tumors. In addition, selecting patients who are more likely to respond to immunotherapy and understanding why resistance develops are crucial areas of ongoing research. The objective of this review was to provide an overview of the current immune landscape and future directions in lung cancer and HNSCC., (© 2020 American Cancer Society.)