Search

Chondrosarcoma is a form of malignant skeletal tumor of cartilaginous origin. The non-malignant form of the disease is termed chondroma. Correctly distinguishing between the two forms is essential for making therapeutic decisions. However, due to their similar histological appearances and the lack of a reliable diagnostic marker, it is often difficult to distinguish benign tumors from low-grade chondrosarcoma. Therefore, it is necessary to search for a potential marker that has diagnostic and prognostic values in chondrosarcoma. In this study, we demonstrated by immunohistochemistry that elevated leukemia/lymphoma-related factor (LRF) expression was associated with increased malignancy in human chondrosarcoma tissue microarrays. Moreover, siRNA depletion of LRF drastically reduced proliferation of chondrosarcoma cell lines and effectively induced senescence in these cells. This could be attributed to the observation that LRF-depleted cells were arrested at the G(1) phase, and had increased p53 and p21 expression. Moreover, LRF depletion not only drastically reduces the cellular migration and invasion potentials of chondrosarcoma cells but also sensitized these cells to the apoptosis-inducing chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin. We conclude that LRF is a survival factor in chondrosarcomas and its expression correlates with tumor malignancy and chemoresistance. Our data implicate the potential role of LRF as both a diagnostic marker and therapeutic target for chondrosarcomas.

In persons at higher risk for colon cancer (e.g., those with sporadic adenoma or ulcerative colitis), compared to those at lower risk, colonic epithelial cell proliferation kinetics are altered. We have shown previously that calcium supplementation appears to normalize the distribution of proliferating cells without affecting the proliferation rate in the colorectal mucosa of sporadic adenoma patients. In a pilot randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial conducted concurrently with our previously published sporadic adenoma trial, we tested whether calcium supplementation can also modulate cell proliferation kinetics in patients with ulcerative colitis. Ulcerative colitis patients (n = 31) were randomized to placebo or 2.0 g of supplemental calcium daily. Colorectal epithelial cell proliferation was determined by immunohistochemical detection of proliferating cell nuclear antigen labeling of cells in "nonprep" rectal biopsies taken at randomization and after 2 months treatment. All biopsies were scored by one reviewer. Differences in mean follow-up minus baseline labeling index (LI; the proportion of colon crypt epithelial cells that were labeled) and in the phi(h) (proportion of labeled cells that were in the upper 40% of the crypts) were compared with analysis of covariance. Pill-taking adherence was 97%. Biopsy-scoring reliability was high (r = 0.89). The pooled baseline LI and phi(h) were 6.3% and 5.6%, respectively. The LI in the calcium group decreased by 0.5% (proportionately, 3%) more than in the placebo group (P = 0.91). Similarly, the phi(h) in the calcium group decreased by 0.3% (proportionately, 10%) more than in the placebo group (P = 0.85). This pilot study does not suggest that 2.0 g of calcium as calcium carbonate daily can substantially normalize either the rate or distribution of proliferating cells over a 2-month period in the colon crypts of patients with ulcerative colitis; a more definitive answer to the question of whether calcium may be effective would require a study with a larger sample size and/or other study design modifications.

The methodological issues for measuring colorectal epithelial cell proliferation, an intermediate end point for studies of colon neoplasia, in epidemiological studies are deceptively numerous and complex, with few methodological data available. Accordingly, during our experience with measuring colorectal epithelial cell proliferation from nearly 500 participants attending over 1300 study visits over a 6-year period, we recorded data on a variety of measurement variations. Methods investigated included rectal biopsy technique, general histological and labeling procedures [including the tritiated thymidine, 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd), and the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) immunohistochemical techniques used to label S-phase cells in colonic crypts in rectal biopsy specimens], biopsy scoring procedures, and summary scoring methods. Findings include that the PCNA technique was the simplest, most economical, and least time-consuming. The BrdUrd labeling failure rate was 15% versus < 1% for PCNA. The percentage of labeled cells (labeling index) was highest using PCNA in biopsies processed without prior incubation, intermediate using PCNA in biopsies processed with prior incubation as for BrdUrd, and lowest using BrdUrd. The percentage of labeled cells that were in the upper 40% of the crypt (phi h) was higher using BrdUrd than PCNA; visit-to-visit correlations were higher using PCNA (r = 0.51 versus 0.35), and visit-to-visit variability was lower and between-person variability was higher using PCNA. Intra- and inter-rater reliabilities for the techniques were comparable (PCNA intra-rater r = 0.93, inter-rater r = 0.92). The PCNA technique, compared to the BrdUrd technique, is more feasible and reliable, provides a more accurate estimate of the labeling index, and cell proliferation measures determined with PCNA have statistical properties that are generally more favorable for detecting differences in clinical trials. Thus, the PCNA technique may be preferable to techniques requiring incubation of biopsies. Other methodological findings lead us to recommend that, for larger studies measuring colorectal epithelial cell proliferation on outpatient rectal biopsies, biopsies should be taken 10 cm above the anus using a flexible, preferably jumbo cup, endoscopic forceps through a rigid sigmoidoscope, and histological sections should be 3 microns thick taken 50 microns apart.