Search

Abstract Objectives This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of escitalopram and sertraline in post-stroke depression (PSD) patients, to provide more reliable therapeutics for cardiovascular and psychiatric clinical practice. Methods We recruited 60 patients (aged 40–89 years old) with an ICD-10 diagnosis of PSD, who were then randomly assigned to two groups and treated with flexible doses of escitalopram (10 to 20 mg/day, n = 30) or sertraline (50 to 200 mg/day, n = 30) for consecutive 8 weeks, respectively. The 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-24), the 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA-14), the Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MOCA), and the Activity of Daily Living scale (ADL) were used to assess patients before, during, and after treatment for depression, anxiety, adverse effects, cognitive function, and daily living activities. Repeated measures ANOVA, the Mann–Whitney U test, the chi-square test (χ2), or Fisher’s exact test was employed to assess baseline demographics, response rate, adverse effects rate, and changes in other clinical variables. Results Significant reduction in HAMD-24 and HAMA-14 scores was evaluated at baseline, as well as 1, 3, 4, 6, and 8 weeks of drug intervention (p 0.05). Further analysis showed a significant variance in the HAMD-24 scores between the two groups at the end of the first week (p 0.05). Conclusion Escitalopram and sertraline showed comparable efficacy for anxiety symptoms, cognitive function, and daily living abilities in PSD patients. In addition, escitalopram was more appropriate for alleviating depressive symptoms. To validate the conclusion, trials with a larger sample size are in demand in the future. The registration number is ChiCTR1800017373.

Abstract Background Maintenance therapy with niraparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, has been shown to extend progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer who responded to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of biomarker status. However, there are limited data on niraparib’s efficacy and safety in the neoadjuvant setting. The objective of Cohort C of the OPAL trial (OPAL-C) is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of neoadjuvant niraparib treatment compared with neoadjuvant platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer with confirmed homologous recombination–deficient tumors. Methods OPAL is an ongoing global, multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial. In OPAL-C, patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive three 21-day cycles of either neoadjuvant niraparib or platinum-taxane doublet neoadjuvant chemotherapy per standard of care. Patients with a complete or partial response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) will then undergo interval debulking surgery; patients with stable disease may proceed to interval debulking surgery or alternative therapy at the investigator’s discretion. Patients with disease progression will exit the study treatment and proceed to alternative therapy at the investigator’s discretion. After interval debulking surgery, all patients will receive up to three 21-day cycles of platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy followed by niraparib maintenance therapy for up to 36 months. Adult patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer eligible to receive neoadjuvant platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery may be enrolled. Patients must have tumors that are homologous recombination–deficient. The primary endpoint is the pre–interval debulking surgery unconfirmed overall response rate, defined as the investigator-assessed percentage of patients with unconfirmed complete or partial response on study treatment before interval debulking surgery per RECIST v1.1. Discussion OPAL-C explores the use of niraparib in the neoadjuvant setting as an alternative to neoadjuvant platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy to improve postsurgical residual disease outcomes for patients with ovarian cancer with homologous recombination–deficient tumors. Positive findings from this approach could significantly impact preoperative ovarian cancer therapy, particularly for patients who are ineligible for primary debulking surgery. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03574779. Registered on February 28, 2022.

Cancer cachexia is a complex problem characterized by weight loss due to skeletal muscle and adipose tissue reduction. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine the association between cancer cachexia and adverse outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases from their inception to January 15, 2024. Retrospective or prospective studies that investigated the cancer cachexia as a predictor of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), or disease control rate (DCR) in NSCLC patients were included in this analysis. Sixteen studies, comprising 5919 NSCLC patients, were identified. The pooled prevalence of cachexia in NSCLC patients was 39%, with individual studies reporting rates ranging from 19% to 63.8%. A meta-analysis using a random effects model showed that cachexia was associated with reduced OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54–2.21) and PFS (HR 1.49; 95% CI 1.27–1.73). Subgroup analysis indicated that cancer cachexia significantly predicted OS, regardless of study design, NSCLC subtypes, cancer stage, definitions of cachexia, or follow-up duration. However, there was no clear association between cancer cachexia and ORR or DCR. Cancer cachexia emerges is a negative prognostic factor for OS and PFS in NSCLC patients. Assessing cancer cachexia can improve risk classification for survival outcomes in this patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of escitalopram and sertraline in post-stroke depression (PSD) patients, to provide more reliable therapeutics for cardiovascular and psychiatric clinical practice. Methods: We recruited 60 patients (aged 40–89 years old) with an ICD-10 diagnosis of PSD, who were then randomly assigned to two groups and treated with flexible doses of escitalopram (10 to 20 mg/day, n = 30) or sertraline (50 to 200 mg/day, n = 30) for consecutive 8 weeks, respectively. The 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-24), the 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA-14), the Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MOCA), and the Activity of Daily Living scale (ADL) were used to assess patients before, during, and after treatment for depression, anxiety, adverse effects, cognitive function, and daily living activities. Repeated measures ANOVA, the Mann–Whitney U test, the chi-square test (χ2), or Fisher's exact test was employed to assess baseline demographics, response rate, adverse effects rate, and changes in other clinical variables. Results: Significant reduction in HAMD-24 and HAMA-14 scores was evaluated at baseline, as well as 1, 3, 4, 6, and 8 weeks of drug intervention (p < 0.01). There was a significant group difference in post-treatment HAMD-24 scores (p < 0.05), but no difference was observed in HAMA-14 scores (p > 0.05). Further analysis showed a significant variance in the HAMD-24 scores between the two groups at the end of the first week (p < 0.01). The incidence of adverse effects in both patient groups was mild, but there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05). The improvement in cognitive function and the recovery of daily living abilities were comparable between both groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Escitalopram and sertraline showed comparable efficacy for anxiety symptoms, cognitive function, and daily living abilities in PSD patients. In addition, escitalopram was more appropriate for alleviating depressive symptoms. To validate the conclusion, trials with a larger sample size are in demand in the future. The registration number is ChiCTR1800017373. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Maintenance therapy with niraparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, has been shown to extend progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer who responded to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of biomarker status. However, there are limited data on niraparib's efficacy and safety in the neoadjuvant setting. The objective of Cohort C of the OPAL trial (OPAL-C) is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of neoadjuvant niraparib treatment compared with neoadjuvant platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer with confirmed homologous recombination–deficient tumors. Methods: OPAL is an ongoing global, multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial. In OPAL-C, patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive three 21-day cycles of either neoadjuvant niraparib or platinum-taxane doublet neoadjuvant chemotherapy per standard of care. Patients with a complete or partial response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) will then undergo interval debulking surgery; patients with stable disease may proceed to interval debulking surgery or alternative therapy at the investigator's discretion. Patients with disease progression will exit the study treatment and proceed to alternative therapy at the investigator's discretion. After interval debulking surgery, all patients will receive up to three 21-day cycles of platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy followed by niraparib maintenance therapy for up to 36 months. Adult patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer eligible to receive neoadjuvant platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery may be enrolled. Patients must have tumors that are homologous recombination–deficient. The primary endpoint is the pre–interval debulking surgery unconfirmed overall response rate, defined as the investigator-assessed percentage of patients with unconfirmed complete or partial response on study treatment before interval debulking surgery per RECIST v1.1. Discussion: OPAL-C explores the use of niraparib in the neoadjuvant setting as an alternative to neoadjuvant platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy to improve postsurgical residual disease outcomes for patients with ovarian cancer with homologous recombination–deficient tumors. Positive findings from this approach could significantly impact preoperative ovarian cancer therapy, particularly for patients who are ineligible for primary debulking surgery. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03574779. Registered on February 28, 2022. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To assess the safety and effectiveness of daratumumab monotherapy in Indian patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Methods: In this prospective, multicenter, phase IV study, patients (aged ≥18 years) received intravenous daratumumab (16 mg/kg) in six cycles. Safety was the primary end point. Results: Of the 139 patients included, 121 (87.1%) experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 53 [38.1%] drug-related), 32 (23%) had ≥1 serious TEAEs (five [3.6%] drug-related) and 16 (11.5%) deaths were reported (one death [0.7%] was drug-related). Overall response rate was 26.3%; 62.7% of patients had stable disease. Median time to first response and median progression-free survival were 5.2 and 5.9 months, respectively. Functional status and well-being were improved. Conclusion: Daratumumab showed an acceptable and expected safety profile with consistent efficacy, providing a novel therapeutic option for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma management in India. Daratumumab is a monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). This study evaluated the outcome of daratumumab single therapy in Indian patients who were not cured with other drugs used for the same disease. 139 adult patients were included in this study from 15 institutes across India. Daratumumab (16 mg/kg) was diluted with 500 or 1000 ml of saline solution and given slowly through the intravenous route 16-times within 6 months. The study examined whether the safety profile and benefits of daratumumab reported in Indian patients were similar to those reported in the RRMM populations of other countries. The study found that most of the adverse events were not severe and could be easily treated by the study physician. 16 patients died (one might have been due to daratumumab treatment). Daratumumab treatment provided life support and recovery benefits to many patients. Daratumumab single therapy provides an appropriate and acceptable safety profile with no new adverse events and consistent benefits in RRMM patients. Clinical Trial Registration:NCT03768960 (ClinicalTrials.gov), CTRI/2019/06/019546. This study demonstrated an acceptable and expected safety profile with consistent efficacy for daratumumab monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, providing a novel therapeutic option for myeloma management in India. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although multiple myeloma is still incurable, an abundance of novel treatments have become available for relapsed and or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Direct head-to-head comparisons between the novel treatments are lacking. We performed a network meta-analysis to evaluate immediate effects such as response quality of current novel-drugs combined therapeutic regimens, with the aim to identify treatments that could be more effective than others in RRMM. We searched Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for randomized controlled clinical trials receiving novel-drugs combined treatments as means of interventions. The primary endpoint was objective response rates (ORRs). We used the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) to sequence treatments. Totally, 22 randomized controlled trials were identified for final evaluation. With the aim to include all regimens within one network analysis, we divided the treatment schemes into 13 categories according to the use of novel drugs. Carfilzomib-, daratumumab-, and isatuximab-based treatments had better ORRs than bortezomib combined dexamethasone and lenalidomide combined dexamethasone. Daratumumab- and isatuximab-based treatments had better ORRs than pomalidomide combined dexamethasone. According to the SUCRA, daratumumab- and isatuximab-based triple-drug regimens had higher probabilities of achieving better ORRs, followed by carfilzomib, elotuzumab, venetoclax, selinexor, ixazomib, vorinostat, pomalidomide, panobinostat, lenalidomide. Our network meta-analysis performed a complete review of the ORRs of all current available novel-drugs based regimens for RRMM. By using the clinical data all from randomized controlled studies, daratumumab- and isatuximab-based treatments were identified to be the best treatments receiving better response quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We evaluated the prevalence of immune-related adverse events and anti-tumor efficacy in advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma following immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of patients with advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with ICIs in four Spanish institutions. irAEs were classified using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE) v.5.0 guidelines. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Other endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). irAEs were evaluated as a time-dependent covariate to avoid immortal time bias. Results: A total of 114 patients were treated with ICIs between May 2013 and May 2019, 105 (92%) of whom received ICIs as monotherapy. irAEs of any grade were experienced in 56 (49%) patients and 21 (18%) patients had grade ≥ 3 toxicity. The most frequent irAEs were gastrointestinal and dermatological toxicities, reported in 25 (22%) and 20 (17%) patients, respectively. Patients with grade 1–2 irAEs had significantly longer OS compared to those without grade 1–2 irAEs (median 18.2 vs. 8.7 months, HR = 0.61 [95% CI 0.39–0.95], p = 0.03). No association with efficacy was observed for patients with grade ≥ 3 irAEs. No difference in PFS was observed after adjusting for the immortal time bias. ORR was higher in patients who developed irAEs (48% vs 17%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that development of irAEs was associated with higher ORR, and patients who developed grade 1–2 irAEs had longer OS. Prospective studies are necessary to confirm our findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We have examined the effect of atomoxetine and Xiaoer Huanglong granules combined with psycho-behavioral modification therapy on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder children. Children diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder were treated with atomoxetine + Xiaoer Huanglong granules (control group) or atomoxetine + Xiaoer Huanglong granules and received psycho-behavioral modification therapy (treatment group). The results show that the treatment group presented a higher overall response rate and a shorter duration of hyperactivity, inattention, and emotional instability than the control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, higher correct scores and serum levels of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, lower error scores and error rate, as well as lower Abbreviated Symptom Questionnaire and Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham, version IV Scale scores, were observed in the treatment group (P < 0.05). Moreover, the incidence of adverse reactions in both groups was similar (P > 0.05). To sum up, atomoxetine, Xiaoer Huanglong granules, and psycho-behavioral modification therapy can effectively improve the learning concentration of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Serous epithelial ovarian cancer, classified as either high-grade (90%) or low-grade (10%), varies in molecular, histological, and clinicopathological presentation. Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) is a rare histologic subtype that lacks disease-specific evidence-based treatment regimens. However, LGSOC is relatively chemo-resistant and has a poor response to traditional treatments. Alternative treatments, including biologic therapies such as bevacizumab, have shown some activity in LGSOC. Thus, the objective of this systematic review is to determine the effect and safety of bevacizumab in the treatment of LGSOC. Following PRISMA guidelines, Medline ALL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase all from the OvidSP platform, ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Registry were searched from inception to February 2022. Articles describing bevacizumab use in patients with LGSOC were included. Article screening, data extraction, and critical appraisal of included studies were completed by two independent reviewers. The effect of bevacizumab on the overall response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse effects were summarized. The literature search identified 3064 articles, 6 of which were included in this study. A total of 153 patients were analyzed; the majority had stage IIIC cancer (56.2%). The overall median response rate reported in the studies was 47.5%. Overall, bevacizumab is a promising treatment for LGSOC, with response rates higher than traditional treatment modalities such as conventional chemotherapy, and is often overlooked as a treatment tool. A prospective clinical trial evaluating the use of bevacizumab in LGSOC is necessary to provide greater evidence and support these findings.

Introduction: We hypothesized that ramucirumab could increase previously reported objective response rate (ORR) of 11% of single-agent nivolumab in the second-line therapy of unresectable mesothelioma. Methods: This was a cooperative group, single-arm, phase 2 trial enrolling patients with unresectable mesothelioma after progression on more than or equal to one pemetrexed-containing regimen. Ramucirumab and nivolumab were given intravenously every 14 days for up to 24 months. The primary end point was ORR; secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 24 weeks and overall survival (OS). Results: Between April 2018 and October 2021, 34 patients were recruited. Median age was 72 (range: 40–89) years, 12% were women, and 79% of tumors had epithelial histology. Median follow-up was 10.2 months (interquartile range 19.6 mo [4.3–23.8]). ORR was 22.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.6%–41.1%) in all population and 43% (95% CI: 10%–82%) in patients with nonepithelioid histology. Of all patients, 45.2% (95% CI: 27.3%–64.0%) had stable disease. PFS rate at 24 weeks was 32% (95% CI: 17%–51%). Median PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI: 1.9–6.4 mo). Median OS was 12.5 months (95% CI: 6.3–23.5 mo). There was no grade greater than or equal to four toxicity. Programmed death-ligand 1 expression in the tumor did not correlate with benefit from treatment. Activation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in response to treatment was associated with a trend toward improvement in PFS. Conclusions: Nivolumab and ramucirumab combination was safe and generated PFS and OS rates and ORR that compare favorably with single-agent nivolumab in a similar patient population. The primary end point of 40% ORR was not reached. Further investigation of this regimen in mesothelioma with nonepithelioid histology may be warranted. Clinical Trial Information: NCT03502746.

ABSTRACTBackground: Although multiple myeloma is still incurable, an abundance of novel treatments have become available for relapsed and or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Direct head-to-head comparisons between the novel treatments are lacking. We performed a network meta-analysis to evaluate immediate effects such as response quality of current novel-drugs combined therapeutic regimens, with the aim to identify treatments that could be more effective than others in RRMM.Methods: We searched Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for randomized controlled clinical trials receiving novel-drugs combined treatments as means of interventions. The primary endpoint was objective response rates (ORRs). We used the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) to sequence treatments. Totally, 22 randomized controlled trials were identified for final evaluation. With the aim to include all regimens within one network analysis, we divided the treatment schemes into 13 categories according to the use of novel drugs.Results: Carfilzomib-, daratumumab-, and isatuximab-based treatments had better ORRs than bortezomib combined dexamethasone and lenalidomide combined dexamethasone. Daratumumab- and isatuximab-based treatments had better ORRs than pomalidomide combined dexamethasone. According to the SUCRA, daratumumab- and isatuximab-based triple-drug regimens had higher probabilities of achieving better ORRs, followed by carfilzomib, elotuzumab, venetoclax, selinexor, ixazomib, vorinostat, pomalidomide, panobinostat, lenalidomide.Conclusions: Our network meta-analysis performed a complete review of the ORRs of all current available novel-drugs based regimens for RRMM. By using the clinical data all from randomized controlled studies, daratumumab- and isatuximab-based treatments were identified to be the best treatments receiving better response quality.

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a life-threatening complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and is primarily treated with steroids. However, there is no standard treatment for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD). Although mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have proven effective for SR-aGVHD, few reports have focused on human umbilical cord blood-derived MSCs (hUCB-MSCs). Here, we report on the efficiency of hUCB-MSCs as the salvage therapy for SR-aGVHD in 54 patients. The overall response rate (ORR) reached 59.3% (32/54) 28 days later. Twenty-four patients achieved complete remission (CR), and 8 achieved partial remission (PR). The median follow-up time after the initiation of hUCB-MSC treatment was 19.3 (0.6–59.0) months. The probability of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 60.9% (47.4–74.4%, 95% CI) and 58.8% (45.3–72.3%, 95% CI), respectively, while that of GVHD/relapse-free survival (GRFS) was only 30.8% (17.86–43.74%, 95% CI). Multivariate analysis revealed that response on Day 28 was an independent favorable prognostic factor (OS, P < 0.001; PFS, P < 0.001; GRFS, P = 0.001), but an age of ≥ 18 years suggested an unfavorable long-term prognosis (OS, P < 0.001; PFS, P < 0.001; GRFS, P = 0.003). In addition, liver involvement was adversely associated with PFS (P = 0.021) and GRFS (P = 0.009). An infused MNC ≥ 8.66 × 108/kg was also detrimental to GRFS (P = 0.031). Collectively, our results support hUCB-MSCs as an effective treatment for SR-aGVHD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are frequently encountered by patients during immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment and are associated with better treatment outcomes. The sequencing of radiotherapy (RT) and ICIs is widely used in current clinical practice, but its effect on survival has remained unclear. Methods: In a real-world multicenter study including 521 patients who received ICI treatment for metastatic or locally advanced cancer, RT schedules and timing, irAEs, time to progression, overall survival, and treatment responses were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Patients who received previous RT and developed irAE (RT +/AE +) had the best overall response rate (ORR 44.0%). The ORR was 40.1% in the RT −/AE + group, 26.7% in the RT −/AE − group and 18.3% in the RT + /AE − group (p < 0.001). There was a significantly longer time to progression (TTP) in the RT + /AE + group compared to the RT −/AE − and RT + /AE − groups (log rank p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively), but the trend toward longer TTP in the RT + /AE + group did not reach statistical significance in pairwise comparison to that in the RT −/AE + group. Preceding RT timing and intent had no statistically significant effect on TTP. In a multivariate model, ECOG = 0 and occurrence of irAEs remained independent positive prognostic factors for TTP (HR 0.737; 95% CI 0.582–0.935; p = 0.012, and HR 0.620; 95% CI 0.499–0.769; p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Better ORR and a trend toward longer TTP were demonstrated for patients with RT preceding ICI treatment and development of irAEs, which suggests that RT may boost the therapeutic effect of immunotherapy in patients with metastatic cancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We previously reported that L-glutamine reduces the severity of mucositis caused by chemoradiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer. However, the impact of glutamine on the anti-tumor effect of chemoradiotherapy remains controversial. This study, which included 40 patients, investigated whether L-glutamine influences survival. Radiation therapy (total: 66 or 70 Gy), cisplatin, and docetaxel were co-administered for a period of 6 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either glutamine (glutamine group, n = 20) or placebo (placebo group, n = 20) during the entire course of chemoradiotherapy. We compared the overall survival and progression-free survival rates between the two groups. At 5-year follow-up, 16 (80%) and 13 (72%) patients in the glutamine and placebo groups, respectively, survived (with no significant difference in overall survival [glutamine group: 55.2 ± 12.7 months vs. placebo group: 48.3 ± 21.3 months]). A total of 14 (70%) and 12 (67%) patients in the glutamine and placebo groups, respectively, did not experience disease progression (with no significant difference in progression-free survival [glutamine group: 46.7 ± 19.5 months vs. placebo group: 43.6 ± 25.2 months]). These findings indicate that L-glutamine does not influence the survival of patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The role of body mass index (BMI) in the treatment outcomes of lymphoma patients is controversial. While investigating the efficacy of ABVD-like regimen in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients, we observed that obese patients had poor responses. To better understand this clinical phenomenon, we evaluated the effect of BMI on responses to ABVD-like chemotherapy in HL patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the clinical outcomes of all 67 patients with confirmed HL who were treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from November 2016 to March 2023 with an ABVD-like regimen as first-line chemotherapy. Baseline patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared across different BMI categories. The primary end-point was the overall response rate defined as the proportion of the HL patients who achieved complete response or partial response. The additional end-points included progression-free survival and overall survival. Results: The median age of the HL patients was 31 years old. Of the patients, 10.4% were obese, and 17.9% patients were overweight. Interim and end-term response evaluations revealed overall response rates of 98.5% and 83.6%, respectively. The proportion of patients with potential poor prognostic factors (IPS risk factors) did not differ significantly in the responders versus non-responders. However, nonresponders had a higher average BMI when compared with responders (p = 0.002). Poor overall response rates in higher BMI patients indeed manifested with shorter progression free survival (p = 0.013). The minimum relative dose of the ABVD-like regimen in the overweight and obese groups was significantly lower than in the normal weight group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our analyses show that >80% of newly-diagnosed HL patients responded to the ABVD-like regimen. We find that being obese or overweight at the time of diagnosis correlated with a poorer overall response rate and that BMI was an independent risk factor in HL patients treated with the ABVD-like regimen. Lower doses of ABVD-like regimen contributed to the discrepant findings of responses in the high BMI groups. These findings indicate that newly-diagnosed, obese HL patients receiving an ABVD-like regimen require personalized treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Serous epithelial ovarian cancer, classified as either high-grade (90%) or low-grade (10%), varies in molecular, histological, and clinicopathological presentation. Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) is a rare histologic subtype that lacks disease-specific evidence-based treatment regimens. However, LGSOC is relatively chemo-resistant and has a poor response to traditional treatments. Alternative treatments, including biologic therapies such as bevacizumab, have shown some activity in LGSOC. Thus, the objective of this systematic review is to determine the effect and safety of bevacizumab in the treatment of LGSOC. Following PRISMA guidelines, Medline ALL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase all from the OvidSP platform, ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Registry were searched from inception to February 2022. Articles describing bevacizumab use in patients with LGSOC were included. Article screening, data extraction, and critical appraisal of included studies were completed by two independent reviewers. The effect of bevacizumab on the overall response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse effects were summarized. The literature search identified 3064 articles, 6 of which were included in this study. A total of 153 patients were analyzed; the majority had stage IIIC cancer (56.2%). The overall median response rate reported in the studies was 47.5%. Overall, bevacizumab is a promising treatment for LGSOC, with response rates higher than traditional treatment modalities such as conventional chemotherapy, and is often overlooked as a treatment tool. A prospective clinical trial evaluating the use of bevacizumab in LGSOC is necessary to provide greater evidence and support these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Management and survival of patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma remain suboptimal. We collected data of 102 patients treated for this disease. Depending on histological subtype, median OS, PFS and ORR ranged from 6.8 to 29.1, 2.9 to 10.9 months and 0% to 42.9%, respectively. Prospective randomized trials for each histotype are needed to improve standard of care. Introduction: Metastatic non clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) is an heterogenous group, usually excluded from phase 3 trials. We report real life data of prognosis and systemic management of those patients. Methods: We retrospectively included 102 metastatic nccRCC patients (unspecified papillary, n = 10; type 1 and 2 papillary n = 10 and n = 32; translocation RCC, n = 9; chromophobe, n = 14; collecting duct, n = 14) treated between 2006 and 2020. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Results: Among patients who underwent pathological review, 40.8% presented a complete histological discordance. First line treatments were mainly tyrosine kinase inhibitor (60.8%), combination including immunotherapy (7.8%) or combination of chemotherapy (13.7%). Median ORR ranged from 0% in unspecified papillary RCC to 42.9% in type 1 papillary RCC. Median PFS ranged from 2.9 months in collecting duct carcinoma to 10.9 months in type 1 papillary RCC. Median OS ranged from 6.8 months in collecting duct carcinoma to 29.1 months in MiT family translocation RCC. Thirty (29.4%) patients were included in a treatment trial during their treatment course. Conclusion: Metastatic nccRCC patients have variable prognosis due to heterogeneity of histological subtypes. Their diagnosis and access to therapeutic innovation remain suboptimal. Dedicated prospective trials are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) is the backbone of induction therapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). There are numerous different protocols to treat PCNSL that incorporate a wide range of HDMTX doses and various combinations with other chemotherapeutic agents. This systematic review was conducted to summarize the various treatment regimens for PCNSL and determine outcomes among the different doses of HDMTX and combination regimens. The findings are intended to provide guidance on the optimal dose and regimen of HDMTX for the treatment of PCNSL. Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a highly aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma that is confined within the CNS. Due to its ability to cross the blood–brain barrier, high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) is the backbone for induction chemotherapy. This systematic review was conducted to observe outcomes among different HDMTX doses (low, <3 g/m2; intermediate, 3–4.9 g/m2; high, ≥5 g/m2) and regimens used in the treatment of PCNSL. A PubMed search resulted in 26 articles reporting clinical trials using HDMTX for PCNSL, from which 35 treatment cohorts were identified for analysis. The median dose of HDMTX used for induction was 3.5 g/m2 (interquartile range IQR, 3–3.5); the intermediate dose was most frequently used in the studies examined (24 cohorts, 69%). Five cohorts used HDMTX monotherapy, 19 cohorts used HDMTX + polychemotherapy, and 11 cohorts used HDMTX + rituximab ± polychemotherapy. Pooled overall response rate (ORR) estimates for low, intermediate, and high dose HDMTX cohorts were 71%, 76%, and 76%, respectively. Pooled 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) estimates for low, intermediate, and high HDMTX dose cohorts were 50%, 51%, and 55%, respectively. Regimens that included rituximab showed a tendency to have higher ORR and 2-year PFS than those that did not include rituximab. These findings indicate that current protocols utilizing 3–4 g/m2 of HDMTX in combination with rituximab provide therapeutic efficacy in PCNSL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The correlation between response and survival has not been well-studied in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Materials & methods: A systematic literature review of Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases (2010–06/2020) and relevant congresses (2018–2020) was performed to identify randomized clinical trials in RRMM reporting median overall survival (mOS), progression-free survival and response end points. The relationship between mOS and response end points was analyzed using Pearson's product-moment correlation. Results: A total of 81 records for 65 original studies, representing 12,827 patients were included. The correlation was moderate for mOS with overall response rate (Pearson r = 0.79), very good partial response (r = 0.73) and duration of response (r = 0.78); all were statistically significant. In linear regression models, estimated mOS gain was 0.48, 0.47 and 1.94 months per percentage point of overall response rate, very good partial response and complete response, respectively (all p < 0.001). Significance was maintained after adjustment for age, relapsed versus refractory multiple myeloma and study year. The analysis was limited by small sample sizes and inconsistent reporting of study-level covariates. Conclusion: These findings support short-term response-based end points as surrogates to survival in RRMM. Treatments for multiple myeloma may not work for every patient and the cancer may come back. In clinical trials, it is difficult to find out how well new treatments work in allowing patients to live longer. This is especially true when patients have advanced disease that has returned or has not responded to treatment. How well a patient responds to treatment (i.e., has a decreased extent of disease) could indicate whether the drug will help the patient live longer, but the relationship between response to treatment and survival is not fully understood. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to better understand how response rates and survival are related. A systematic review collects all the published research on a specific subject, and a meta-analysis is a statistical method that creates a single finding from several separate studies. This study found a moderate relationship between how long patients live after receiving treatment for multiple myeloma and their response to treatment. This would allow response-to-treatment data from clinical trials to be used to predict better survival and show the drug can help patients. Potential surrogate? Overall response rate, very good partial response and duration of response were all shown to have a significant, moderate correlation with overall survival among relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Daratumumab, a CD38 monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated efficacy as monotherapy and combination therapy across several indications, both among newly-diagnosed and refractory patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, there is limited evidence on treatment patterns and effectiveness of daratumumab in the real-world setting, particularly in first line (1 L). This study aimed to describe real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients initiating daratumumab across different lines of therapy. Methods A retrospective chart review of adult patients with MM initiating daratumumab between November 2015 and March 2021 was conducted at two clinical sites in the United States. De-identified patient-level data were abstracted in an electronic case report form. Patient characteristics and treatment patterns were described. Clinical outcomes including overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival, and time to next line of therapy were reported using descriptive statistics and stratified by line of therapy (1 L, second line [2 L] or third line or later [3 L+]). A sub-group analysis evaluated treatment patterns and ORR among patients re-treated with daratumumab. Results A total of 299 patients were included in the study (mean age: 68 years; 55% male). Among them, 26 were 1 L patients, 66 were 2 L patients, and 207 were 3 L+ patients; 110 patients (36.8%) received a stem cell transplant prior to daratumumab initiation. The mean duration of follow-up was 10 months among 1 L patients and 19 months among 2 L and 3 L+ patients. Patients who initiated daratumumab in 1 L had a 100% ORR, while those initiating in 2 L and 3 L+ had an ORR of 78.8 and 65.2%, respectively. Among re-treated patients, ORR was 66.7% during the first treatment segment, and 52.9% during the second treatment segment. Kaplan-Meier rates of progression-free survival at 12 months were 89.9, 75.2, and 53.1% among patients who initiated daratumumab in 1 L, 2 L, and 3 L+, respectively. Kaplan-Meier rates of time to next line of therapy at 12 months were 94.1, 73.4, and 50.0% among patients who initiated daratumumab in 1 L, 2 L, and 3 L+, respectively. Conclusions These findings suggest that daratumumab-based regimens are an effective treatment option across all lines of therapy, with highest response rate in 1 L.

Introduction: Zanubrutinib is a highly selective irreversible inhibitor of Bruton tyrosine kinase which has shown significant activity in lymphoid malignancies in early phase studies. We report here the long-term follow-up outcomes of zanubrutinib in various lines of therapy in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL).Methods: This post hoc analysis pooled patients with treatment-naïve (TN) or relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL/SLL receiving zanubrutinib monotherapy from three phase 1/2 studies (BGB-3111-1002, BGB-3111-AU-003, BGB-3111-205).Results: A total of 211 patients with CLL/SLL (TN 19, R/R 192) were included. After weighting (TN 19, R/R 24), the overall response rate (ORR) was 95.4% and significantly higher in the TN group than in the R/R group (100 vs. 91.0%, p < 0.0001). ORR was also significantly higher in the TN group than in the one prior line of therapy group (100 vs. 98.9%, p < 0.0001). Among those with R/R disease, the ORR was 97.8% in patients with one prior line of therapy (n = 79) and 90.7% in those with > 1 prior lines of therapy (n = 85; p = 0.080). The median follow-up times were 50.1, 35.7, and 45.9 months for TN, R/R and all cohorts, respectively. Progression-free survival and overall survival were significantly longer in the TN group and only one prior line of therapy group compared with the > 1 prior lines of therapy group (all p < 0.05) and were similar in the TN group compared with the one prior line therapy group. Efficacy was similar regardless of the presence of genomic aberrations. Most frequent grade ≥ 3 adverse events were infections (41.7%), neutropenia (34.1%), and thrombocytopenia (9.4%). Atrial fibrillation occurred in only 1.9% of patients.Conclusions: With extended follow-up, zanubrutinib yielded long-term benefits and demonstrated a favorable safety profile for patients with TN or RR CLL/SLL. Earlier utilization of zanubrutinib was associated with better outcomes.Trial Registration: Clinical Trials.gov identifiers, NCT03189524, NCT02343120 (retrospectively registered), and NCT03206918 (retrospectively registered). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a rare disease of elderly people characterized by the presence of sustained peripheral blood monocytosis, overlapping features of myeloproliferation, and myelodysplasia. We present a large retrospective study of 156 CMML patients in China. Mean age at diagnosis was 68 years old (range 23‐91). According to the CMML‐specific prognostic scoring system (CPSS), 10 patients (8.3%) were low risk, 27 patients (22.5%) were intermediate‐1 risk, 72 patients (60%) were intermediate‐2 risk, and 11 patients (9.2%) were high risk. A total of 90 patients (57.7%) received hypomethylating agents (HMAs) treatment, 19 patients (12.2%) received chemotherapy and 47 patients (30.1%) received the best supportive care. Seventeen patients (10.9%) underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐SCT) after HMAs treatment or chemotherapy. With a median follow‐up of 35.3 months, overall response rate (ORR) was 69.5% in the HMAs ± chemotherapy group, 79.5% in the HMAs monotherapy group, 60.0% in the HMAs + chemotherapy group, and 37.5% in the chemotherapy group. HMAs monotherapy group had prolonged OS compared with the chemotherapy group (23.57 months vs. 11.73 months; p = 0.035). Patients who achieved ORR had prolonged OS (25.83 months vs. 8.00 months; p

Purpose: To investigate clinical characteristics, management, and prognosis of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive lymphoma-associated hemophagocytic syndrome (LAHS) patients in real-world practice. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study. EBV-positive LAHS patients diagnosed from January 2010 to December 2021 in our center were enrolled. Clinical characteristics, treatment, overall response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS) were investigated. Univariate and multivariate analysis of potential factors were conducted. Results: Of the 51 patients, 44 were T/NK cell lymphoma; five were B cell lymphoma; two were Hodgkin lymphoma. EBV-positive T/NK cell LAHS patients were significantly younger and showed lower fibrinogen levels and C-reactive protein levels than EBV-positive B cell LAHS patients (P =0.033, P =0.000, and P =0.004, respectively). Combined treatment of anti-hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) and anti-lymphoma treatment was conducted in 24 patients; anti-HLH treatment was conducted in 18 patients; anti-lymphoma treatment was conducted in three patients; glucocorticoid treatment was conducted in one patient. ORR was 47.8%, and the median OS was 61 (95% confidence interval 47.9-74.1) days for overall patients. Patients who received anti-HLH treatment and turned to anti-lymphoma treatment early displayed higher ORR and OS than those of anti-HLH patients (P =0.103, and P =0.003, respectively). Elevated alanine aminotransferase level was the independent risk factor of EBV-positive LAHS prognosis. Conclusions: Prognosis of EBV-positive LAHS patients was poor. Anti-lymphoma treatment should be initiated as soon as HLH was rapidly controlled. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PurposeTo investigate clinical characteristics, management, and prognosis of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive lymphoma-associated hemophagocytic syndrome (LAHS) patients in real-world practice.MethodsThis was a retrospective, single-center cohort study. EBV-positive LAHS patients diagnosed from January 2010 to December 2021 in our center were enrolled. Clinical characteristics, treatment, overall response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS) were investigated. Univariate and multivariate analysis of potential factors were conducted.ResultsOf the 51 patients, 44 were T/NK cell lymphoma; five were B cell lymphoma; two were Hodgkin lymphoma. EBV-positive T/NK cell LAHS patients were significantly younger and showed lower fibrinogen levels and C-reactive protein levels than EBV-positive B cell LAHS patients (P=0.033, P=0.000, and P=0.004, respectively). Combined treatment of anti-hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) and anti-lymphoma treatment was conducted in 24 patients; anti-HLH treatment was conducted in 18 patients; anti-lymphoma treatment was conducted in three patients; glucocorticoid treatment was conducted in one patient. ORR was 47.8%, and the median OS was 61 (95% confidence interval 47.9-74.1) days for overall patients. Patients who received anti-HLH treatment and turned to anti-lymphoma treatment early displayed higher ORR and OS than those of anti-HLH patients (P=0.103, and P=0.003, respectively). Elevated alanine aminotransferase level was the independent risk factor of EBV-positive LAHS prognosis.ConclusionsPrognosis of EBV-positive LAHS patients was poor. Anti-lymphoma treatment should be initiated as soon as HLH was rapidly controlled.

Background: Daratumumab, a CD38 monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated efficacy as monotherapy and combination therapy across several indications, both among newly-diagnosed and refractory patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, there is limited evidence on treatment patterns and effectiveness of daratumumab in the real-world setting, particularly in first line (1 L). This study aimed to describe real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients initiating daratumumab across different lines of therapy. Methods: A retrospective chart review of adult patients with MM initiating daratumumab between November 2015 and March 2021 was conducted at two clinical sites in the United States. De-identified patient-level data were abstracted in an electronic case report form. Patient characteristics and treatment patterns were described. Clinical outcomes including overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival, and time to next line of therapy were reported using descriptive statistics and stratified by line of therapy (1 L, second line [2 L] or third line or later [3 L+]). A sub-group analysis evaluated treatment patterns and ORR among patients re-treated with daratumumab. Results: A total of 299 patients were included in the study (mean age: 68 years; 55% male). Among them, 26 were 1 L patients, 66 were 2 L patients, and 207 were 3 L+ patients; 110 patients (36.8%) received a stem cell transplant prior to daratumumab initiation. The mean duration of follow-up was 10 months among 1 L patients and 19 months among 2 L and 3 L+ patients. Patients who initiated daratumumab in 1 L had a 100% ORR, while those initiating in 2 L and 3 L+ had an ORR of 78.8 and 65.2%, respectively. Among re-treated patients, ORR was 66.7% during the first treatment segment, and 52.9% during the second treatment segment. Kaplan-Meier rates of progression-free survival at 12 months were 89.9, 75.2, and 53.1% among patients who initiated daratumumab in 1 L, 2 L, and 3 L+, respectively. Kaplan-Meier rates of time to next line of therapy at 12 months were 94.1, 73.4, and 50.0% among patients who initiated daratumumab in 1 L, 2 L, and 3 L+, respectively. Conclusions: These findings suggest that daratumumab-based regimens are an effective treatment option across all lines of therapy, with highest response rate in 1 L. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis is an immune-mediated multi-system inflammatory disease that mainly involves synovium and joints. It has a high incidence and a long course of disease. This paper evaluates the clinical effect of acupuncture and moxibustion combined with Duhuo Jisheng Decoction in treating rheumatoid arthritis through a systematic evaluation. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, CNKI, Sinomed, WanFang, and VIP were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding acupuncture and moxibustion combined with Duhuo Jisheng Decoction for treating rheumatoid arthritis. The retrieval time was from the inception of the databases to August 2020. Two researchers independently conducted literature search, screening and data extraction. According to RCT risk of bias tool provided by Cochrane collaboration network, a bias risk assessment of all included literatures was conducted followed by Meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: A total of 16 RCTs were included, and scored according to the modified Jadad scale, including 1 article with 4 points, 4 articles with 3 points, 8 articles with 2 points, and 3 articles with 1 point. The overall quality of the included RCTs was low. A total of 1 551 cases were involved in these 16 RCTs, including 777 cases in the trial group (Duhuo Jisheng Decoction) and 774 cases in the control group (western medicine). The results of meta-analysis showed acupuncture and moxibustion combined with Duhuo Jisheng Decoction were all better than the control group in terms of overall response rate (relative risk (RR)=1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15 to 1.25, P < 0.000 01), morning stiffness time (weighted mean difference (WMD)=-0.86, 95% CI: -1.13 to -0.58, P < 0.000 01), 20-meter walk time (WMD=-4.64, 95% CI: -5.24 to -4.04, P < 0.000 01), joint swelling index (< 49 years old) (WMD=-2.42, 95% CI: -2.58 to -2.26, P < 0.000 01), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (WMD=-1.56, 95% CI: -1.73 to -1.40, P < 0.000 01), C-reactive protein (WMD=-1.18, 95% CI: -1.34 to -1.02, P < 0.000 01), rheumatoid factor (WMD=-2.26, 95% CI: -2.55 to -1.97, P < 0.000 01), tumor necrosis factor-α (WMD=-42.28, 95% CI: -47.47 to -37.09, P < 0.000 01) and adverse reaction incidence (RR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.80, P=0.01). CONCLUSION: Compared with western medicine, acupuncture and moxibustion combined with Duhuo Jisheng Decoction for treating rheumatoid arthritis has advantages in the overall response rate, improvement of clinical symptoms, incidence of adverse reactions, and safety, but due to the limitations of literature quality and publication bias, high-quality, multicenter, large-sample RCTs are required to further assess the efficacy and safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Kai Ding ,* Hong Yu ,* Yuan-Yuan Shao, Li-Yan Li, Chao-Meng Wang, Jia Song, Li-Juan Li, Rong Fu Department of Hematology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Rong Fu Tel +86-18622008752Email florai@sina.comObjective: To assess the short-term efficacy and safety of ixazomib in Chinese multiple myeloma (MM) patients in the real world.Methods: Fifty-nine MM patients who received at least one cycle of ixazomib-based therapy between 1 June 2018 and 30 September 2019 were retrospectively analyzed in Tianjin Medical University General Hospital. Thirteen newly diagnosed MM (NDMM), 13 refractory/relapsed MM (RRMM) and 33 continuous therapy (27 bortezomib peripheral neuritis (PN) intolerant and six maintenance therapy) MM patients were included. The indicated overall response rate (ORR), time to overall response (TOR), and adverse events (AEs) were investigated.Results: The ORR in NDMM was 76.9%, with one complete response (CR), five very good partial response (VGPR), four partial response (PR), median PFS, and TOR were 122 (66– 272) days and 49 (22– 108) days. The ORR in RRMM was 46.2%, with one CR, two VGPR, three PR, median PFS, and TOR were 79 (28– 169) days and 59 (23– 88) days. The ORR in continuous therapy MM patients was 100%, with nine stringent CR, 15 CR, six VGPR and three PR, median TOR was 75 (25– 141) days. There were no significant differences regarding ORR between patients with cytogenetic high risk and standard risk in three subgroups (all P> 0.05). The most frequent hematological AEs were anemia (13.6%) and thrombocytopenia (10.2%). The most common nonhematological AEs were PN (25.0%) and diarrhea (13.6%).Conclusion: The real-world data demonstrated that ixazomib-based therapy was generally effective and safe in the short term for MM patients.Keywords: multiple myeloma, ixazomib, real world, overall response rate, adverse events

Abstract Background Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP)/CHOP-like chemotherapy is widely used in peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL). Here we conducted a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, comparing the efficacy and safety of CEOP/IVE/GDP alternating regimen with CEOP in newly diagnosed PTCL. Methods PTCL patients, except for anaplastic large cell lymphoma-anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive, were 1:1 randomly assigned to receive CEOP/IVE/GDP (CEOP, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, epirubicin 70 mg/m2, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 [maximum 2 mg] on day 1, and prednisone 60 mg/m2 [maximum 100 mg] on days 1–5 every 21 days, at the first and fourth cycle; IVE, ifosfamide 2000 mg/m2 on days 1–3, epirubicin 70 mg/m2 on day 1, and etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1–3 every 21 days, at the second and fifth cycle; and GDP, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on days 1–3, and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1–4 every 21 days, at the third and sixth cycle) and CEOP (every 21 days for 6 cycles). Analysis of efficacy and safety was of the intent-to-treatment population. The primary endpoint was a complete response rate at the end of treatment. Meanwhile, whole exome sequencing and targeted sequencing were performed in 62 patients with available tumor samples to explore prognostic biomarkers in this cohort as an exploratory post hoc analysis. Results Among 106 patients, 53 each were enrolled to CEOP/IVE/GDP and CEOP. With 51 evaluable patients each in two groups, a complete response rate of the CEOP/IVE/GDP group was similar to that of the CEOP group (37.3% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.532). There was no difference in median progression-free survival (PFS; 15.4 months vs. 9.2 months, p = 0.122) or overall survival (OS; 24.3 months vs. 21.9 months, p = 0.178). Grade 3–4 hematological and non-hematological adverse events were comparable. Histone modification genes were most frequently mutated (25/62, 40.3%), namely KMT2D, KMT2A, SETD2, EP300, and CREBBP. Multivariate analysis indicated that CREBBP and IDH2 mutations were independent factors predicting poor PFS and OS (all p

Background: The recurrence rate of liver cancer after surgery is high. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an effective treatment for liver cancer; however, its efficacy in recurrent liver cancer remains unclear., Aim: To investigate the clinical effect of TACE combined with RFA in the treatment of recurrent liver cancer., Methods: Ninety patients with recurrent liver cancer were divided into 2 groups according to treatment plan: Control (RFA alone); and experimental [TACE combined with RFA (TACE + RFA)]. The incidence of increased alanine aminotransferase levels, complications, and other indices were compared between the two groups before and after the procedures., Results: One month after the procedures, the short-term efficacy rate and Karnofsky Performance Status scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group ( P < 0.05). Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and total bilirubin levels were lower than those in the control group ( P < 0.05); The overall response rate was 82.22% and 66.67% in the experimental and control groups, respectively; The disease control rate was 93.33% and 82.22% in the experimental and control groups, respectively, the differences are statistically significant ( P < 0.05). And there were no statistical differences in complications between the two groups ( P > 0.05)., Conclusion: TACE + RFA was effective for the treatment of recurrent liver cancer and significantly reduced AFP levels and improved various indices of liver function., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article., (©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) of the lung is a rare variant of adenocarcinoma characterized by abundant intracytoplasmic mucin within the tumor. Although IMA has poor sensitivity to conventional chemotherapy regimens used for non-small cell lung cancer, we observed a better response to the bevacizumab (BEV) regimen. In this retrospective study, we aimed to investigate the response to BEV-combined regimens in patients with IMA. Among 16 consecutive patients diagnosed with IMA between January 2016 and December 2020 at our institution and treated with systemic chemotherapy, seven patients were treated with BEV-combined regimens. The overall response rate to BEV-combined regimens was 85.7%, with six patients showing a partial response. The median progression-free survival was 6.1 months. One patient experienced respiratory failure, which was improved after administration of BEV-combined regimen. BEV-combined systemic therapy may have a favorable effect on advanced or recurrent IMA of the lung., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Sekine reports receiving personal fee from Chugai, outside of the submitted work. Dr. Ikeda reports receiving grants and personal fees from Chugai and AstraZeneca; and personal fees from Ono, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Pfizer, outside of the submitted work. Dr. Ogura reports receiving personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Shionogi, outside of the submitted work. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Japanese Respiratory Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel, bb2121), a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, has been investigated in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have received an immunomodulatory drug, proteasome inhibitor, and anti-CD38 antibody in the single-arm phase 2 KarMMa clinical trial. Two therapies with distinct mechanisms of action – selinexor plus dexamethasone (Sd) and belantamab mafodotin (BM) – are currently approved in the United States for heavily pretreated patients, including those who are triple-class refractory. To compare ide-cel versus Sd and ide-cel versus BM, matching-adjusted indirect comparisons were performed. Ide-cel extended progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus both Sd and BM (hazard ratio (HR); 95% confidence interval (CI)). PFS: ide-cel versus Sd, 0.46; 0.28–0.75; ide-cel versus BM, 0.45; 0.27–0.77. OS: ide-cel versus Sd, 0.23; 0.13–0.42; ide-cel versus BM, 0.35; 0.14–0.87. These results suggest ide-cel offers clinically meaningful improvements over currently approved regimens for patients with heavily pretreated RRMM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), especially steroid-refractory GVHD, remains a life-threatening complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The effect of the JAK1/2 kinase inhibitor ruxolitinib on treating steroid-refractory acute GVHD has been verified by the REACH1/2 study; however, its safety and efficacy in patients with steroid-refractory chronic GVHD (SR-cGVHD) remain unclear. In this retrospective study, 70 patients received ruxolitinib as a salvage therapy for SR-cGVHD. Twenty-four weeks after ruxolitinib treatment, the overall response rate (ORR) was 74.3% (52/70), including 34 patients who achieved complete remission (CR) and 18 who achieved partial remission (PR). The main adverse event was cytopenia, which occurred in 51.4% (36/70) of patients. After ruxolitinib treatment, the percentage of CD4 cells increased from 18.20% to 23.22% (P

PurposeGiven that the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has disrupted operations globally, an institution’s ability to repeat transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has also been affected. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 on the intervals and outcomes of TACE in HCC patients.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study included 154 HCC patients who underwent follow-up after TACE treatment from January 2020 to March 2020 (n = 71, study group) and January 2019 to March 2019 (n = 83, control group) at two institutions in China. The endpoints included the follow-up interval and overall response rate (ORR). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for a worse ORR. The cut-off point was determined to divide follow-up durations into long- and short-intervals.ResultsThe median follow-up interval was 82.0 days (IQR, 61–109) in the study group, which was significantly longer than 66.0 days (IQR, 51–94) in the control group (P = 0.004). The ORR was 23.9 and 39.8% in the study and control group, respectively (P = 0.037). The cut-off value was 95 days. The grouping (OR, 2.402; 95% CI, 1.040–5.546; P = 0.040), long interval (OR, 2.573; 95% CI, 1.022–6.478; P = 0.045), and China liver cancer staging system (OR, 2.500; 95% CI, 1.797–3.480; P 95 days tend to have a worse prognosis.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), especially steroid-refractory GVHD, remains a life-threatening complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The effect of the JAK1/2 kinase inhibitor ruxolitinib on treating steroid-refractory acute GVHD has been verified by the REACH1/2 study; however, its safety and efficacy in patients with steroid-refractory chronic GVHD (SR-cGVHD) remain unclear. In this retrospective study, 70 patients received ruxolitinib as a salvage therapy for SR-cGVHD. Twenty-four weeks after ruxolitinib treatment, the overall response rate (ORR) was 74.3% (52/70), including 34 patients who achieved complete remission (CR) and 18 who achieved partial remission (PR). The main adverse event was cytopenia, which occurred in 51.4% (36/70) of patients. After ruxolitinib treatment, the percentage of CD4 cells increased from 18.20% to 23.22% (P <0.001), while the percentages of NK (CD16+CD56+) cells and regulatory T cells (CD4+CD127 ± CD25+) decreased (P <0.001, P <0.001). Among the B cell subsets, the proportion of total B cells approximately tripled from 3.69% to 11.16% (P <0.001). Moreover, we observed a significant increase in IL-10 levels after ruxolitinib treatment (P =0.025) and a remarkable decrease in levels of suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) from 229.90 ng/ml to 72.65 ng/ml. The median follow-up after the initiation of ruxolitinib treatment was 401 (6-1076) days. The estimated one-year overall survival rate of the whole group was 66.0% (54.4–77.6%, 95% CI), and the one-year overall survival rate of patients with mild and moderate cGVHD was 69.6% (57.4–81.8%, 95% CI), which was better than that of patients with severe cGVHD (31.3%, 0.0–66.2%, 95% CI) (P =0.002). Patients who achieved a CR and PR achieved better survival outcomes (84.5%, 73.9–95.1%, 95% CI) than those who showed NR to ruxolitinib treatments (16.7%, 0–34.3%, 95% CI) (P <0.001). At the final follow-up, cGVHD relapse occurred in six patients after they reduced or continued their ruxolitinib doses. Collectively, our results suggest that ruxolitinib is potentially a safe and effective treatment for SR-cGVHD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The overall response rate (ORR) is a largely adopted outcome measure in early‐phase oncology trials. ORR is highly relevant in cancer drug development at the time of deciding whether to move to confirmatory phase 3 trials; moreover, ORR is gaining increasing relevance in fast‐track registration procedures. No systematic analysis has been conducted so far to investigate whether a discrepancy exists between ORR assessed by local investigators and those assessed by blinded reviewers in phase 2 oncology trials. In this study, we carried out a search in the clinicaltrials.gov and EudraCT databases, looking at the trials reporting the results of both investigator‐assessed and independently‐assessed ORR. A discrepancy index was obtained by calculating the ratio of each investigator‐assessed ORR on the corresponding independently assessed ORR, so that a discrepancy index >1 indicates that the investigator was "more optimistic," whereas a discrepancy index <1 indicates the opposite. We also analyzed different subgroups (by tumor type, by drug type, by year). Twenty trials met the search criteria; in some cases, >1 comparison was conducted in the trial, so that the total number of comparisons analyzed was 33. The estimated mean discrepancy index was 1.175 (95% confidence interval, 1.083‐1.264; n = 33). In conclusion, local investigators significantly overestimate ORR compared to paired blinded reviewers in phase 2 oncology trials. This may represent a risk in drug development, when deciding whether to move to confirmatory, more expensive phase 3 trials. Blinded independent central review should be used in ORR assessment if a more conservative estimate of treatment efficacy is required, as in the case of fast‐track drug developments leading to accelerated approvals of cancer therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Given that the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has disrupted operations globally, an institution's ability to repeat transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has also been affected. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 on the intervals and outcomes of TACE in HCC patients. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 154 HCC patients who underwent follow-up after TACE treatment from January 2020 to March 2020 (n = 71, study group) and January 2019 to March 2019 (n = 83, control group) at two institutions in China. The endpoints included the follow-up interval and overall response rate (ORR). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for a worse ORR. The cut-off point was determined to divide follow-up durations into long- and short-intervals. Results: The median follow-up interval was 82.0 days (IQR, 61–109) in the study group, which was significantly longer than 66.0 days (IQR, 51–94) in the control group (P = 0.004). The ORR was 23.9 and 39.8% in the study and control group, respectively (P = 0.037). The cut-off value was 95 days. The grouping (OR, 2.402; 95% CI, 1.040–5.546; P = 0.040), long interval (OR, 2.573; 95% CI, 1.022–6.478; P = 0.045), and China liver cancer staging system (OR, 2.500; 95% CI, 1.797–3.480; P < 0.001) were independent predictors for the efficacy of TACE treatment. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic causes a longer follow-up interval in general, which may further lead to a lower ORR in HCC patients. Those with a follow-up interval of >95 days tend to have a worse prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a rare disease of elderly people characterized by the presence of sustained peripheral blood monocytosis, overlapping features of myeloproliferation, and myelodysplasia. We present a large retrospective study of 156 CMML patients in China. Mean age at diagnosis was 68 years old (range 23‐91). According to the CMML‐specific prognostic scoring system (CPSS), 10 patients (8.3%) were low risk, 27 patients (22.5%) were intermediate‐1 risk, 72 patients (60%) were intermediate‐2 risk, and 11 patients (9.2%) were high risk. A total of 90 patients (57.7%) received hypomethylating agents (HMAs) treatment, 19 patients (12.2%) received chemotherapy and 47 patients (30.1%) received the best supportive care. Seventeen patients (10.9%) underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐SCT) after HMAs treatment or chemotherapy. With a median follow‐up of 35.3 months, overall response rate (ORR) was 69.5% in the HMAs ± chemotherapy group, 79.5% in the HMAs monotherapy group, 60.0% in the HMAs + chemotherapy group, and 37.5% in the chemotherapy group. HMAs monotherapy group had prolonged OS compared with the chemotherapy group (23.57 months vs. 11.73 months; p = 0.035). Patients who achieved ORR had prolonged OS (25.83 months vs. 8.00 months; p < 0.001) and LFS (20.53 months vs. 6.80 months; p < 0.001) compared with those not achieved ORR in the HMA ± chemotherapy group. By univariate analysis, only higher hemoglobulin (≥80 g/L) and lower serum LDH levels (<300 U/L) predicted for better OS and LFS. By multivariate analysis, only Hb ≥ 80 g/L predicted for prolonged OS, Hb ≥ 80 g/L, and monocytes < 3 × 109/L predicted for prolonged LFS. In summary, our study highlights the benefit of HMAs therapy in CMML, but we still need to develop novel therapeutics to achieve better outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: T‐cell large granular lymphocytic leukaemia (T‐LGLL) is an incurable leukaemia characterised by clonal proliferation of abnormal cytotoxic T cells that can result in severe neutropenia, transfusion‐dependent anaemia and pancytopenia requiring treatment. The most commonly used agents, methotrexate (MTX), cyclophosphamide (Cy) and cyclosporine primarily produce partial remissions (PRs), with few complete responses (CRs). We evaluated the clinical course and treatment response of 60 consecutive patients with T‐LGLL to evaluate clinical outcomes and future potential treatment directions. Impaired overall survival was noted among male patients, patients with elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and those without rheumatoid arthritis. Cy was the most efficacious second‐line agent, with a 70% overall response rate (ORR; three CR, four PR). All patients who failed frontline MTX responded to second‐line Cy. In the relapsed or Cy‐refractory setting, alemtuzumab (n = 4) and pentostatin (n = 3) had an ORR of 50% and 66%, respectively, while duvelisib induced a long‐term response in one patient. In this large, retrospective analysis, our results suggest Cy is a highly effective therapy for second‐line treatment in T‐LGLL and should be considered a strong candidate for up‐front therapy in select high‐risk patients. Prospective studies evaluating pentostatin, alemtuzumab and novel agents, such as duvelisib, are needed for patients with relapsed/refractory T‐LGLL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Translocation t(4;14) is an independent prognostic factor for adverse outcome in multiple myeloma (MM). However, reports concerning the therapeutic effects of novel drugs on t(4;14) MM are few. We retrospectively investigated the clinical and prognostic significance of symptomatic MM cases with t(4;14) treated with novel therapies. Ninety-three patients (IgG, 56; IgA, 23; BjP, 14) newly diagnosed with MM were included (median age, 71 years; median observation period, 27.8 months). t(4;14) MM was diagnosed in 17 (IgG, 7; IgA, 9; BjP, 1) patients (18%). An association between t(4;14) and the IgA isotype was confirmed (p = 0.02). Overall survival (OS) at 3 years was lower in the t(4;14) patients than without t(4;14) group (81.2% vs 66.7%, p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis showed that t(4;14) was an independent predictor of OS (hazard ratio [HR], 7.58; 95.0% confidence interval [CI], 1.43–39.9; p = 0.0017). The ORR after autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT) did not differ with or without t(4;14); progression-free survival tended to be prolonged in the group without t(4;14) (p = 0.088). Thus, even in the era of novel drugs, t(4;14) MM still has a poor prognosis, and triplet consolidation therapy should be continued. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In multiple myeloma (MM), improving our understanding of routine clinical practice and the effectiveness of agents outside of clinical trials is important. TOURMALINE-MM1 data resulted in approval of ixazomib for MM patients who have received ≥ 1 prior therapy., Patients and Methods: UVEA-IXA comprised a retrospective chart review in the early access program, and a prospective 1-year follow-up period. Eligible patients had had a biochemical and/or symptomatic relapse after 1-3 prior lines of therapy; no anti-MM therapy for > 3 cycles at the start of ixazomib therapy; and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0-2. Lenalidomide- or proteasome inhibitor (PI)-refractory patients were ineligible. Primary endpoints were response and progression-free survival (PFS)., Results: Of 357 enrolled patients, 309 were evaluable; most patients received ixazomib alongside lenalidomide (98%) and dexamethasone (97%); 61% had received 2-3 prior lines of therapy. Median PFS was 15.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.0-20.6) in all evaluable patients, and 19.6 (95% CI: 12.1-27.0) and 13.9 (95% CI: 10.1-18.1) months in patients who received 1 and ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy, respectively. The overall response rate was 67% in all evaluable patients, and 72% and 63%, respectively, in patients who received 1 and ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy. Median overall survival was 35.5 months. The ixazomib safety profile was consistent with previous reports., Conclusion: This study supports ixazomib-based therapy as an effective and tolerable treatment in the real-world. Outcomes were favorable in patients with 1 or ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy who were not lenalidomide- or PI-refractory., Competing Interests: Disclosures HL received research funding from Amgen and Sanofi; received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Celgene-BMS, Janssen-Cilag, Sanofi, Amgen, Takeda, and AbbVie; participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Celgene-BMS, Janssen-Cilag, Sanofi, Amgen, Takeda, and AbbVie. KR received grant funding to his institution from Janssen, Amgen, Takeda, GSK, and Celgene-BMS; received honoraria from Janssen, Adaptive Biotech, Amgen, Takeda, AbbVie, Oncopeptides, Celgene-BMS, Pfizer, and GSK; received support for attending meetings and/or travel from BMS, Amgen, and Takeda; participated on Advisory Boards for Janssen, Adaptive Biotech, Amgen, Takeda, AbbVie, Oncopeptides, Celgene-BMS, Pfizer, and GSK. M-VM received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, Amgen, GSK, AbbVie, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Oncopeptides, and Steamline; participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Janssen, Celgene, Sanofi, Takeda, GSK, Pfizer, Roche, and Steamline. ML received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Sandoz, Janssen, Takeda, and Amgen; participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Novartis, Janssen, Takeda, and Amgen. AO and LS are employees of MediNeos, the contract-research organization which was involved by Takeda EUCAN for the design, conduction, and analysis of the study. N-BE is a Takeda employee and hold shares in Takeda. DMS was a Takeda employee and held stock in Takeda when the study was conducted and the manuscript was developed; received support for the present manuscript from Takeda. FG is a Takeda employee and hold shares and stock in Takeda; received support for the present manuscript from Takeda. ET received support for the present manuscript from Takeda; received grants or contracts from Amgen, GSK, Janssen, Sanofi, and Takeda; received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, BMS, GSK, Janssen, Menarini, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Takeda; received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Amgen, EUSA Pharma, and Takeda; participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for BMS, GSK, Janssen, Sanofi, and Takeda. RH received grants/contracts to his institution from Janssen, Amgen, Celgene, BMS, Novartis, and Takeda; received consulting fees from Janssen, Amgen, Celgene, AbbVie, BMS, Novartis, PharmaMar, and Takeda; received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Janssen, Amgen, Celgene, BMS, PharmaMar, and Takeda; received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Amgen, Celgene, Takeda, Janssen; participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for BMS, Takeda, Amgen, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, Janssen, GSK. BK and VG have nothing to disclose. Steering committee membership: KR, NB-E, ET., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)