1. 18 FDG PET/CT in the early assessment of non-small cell lung cancer response to immunotherapy: frequency and clinical significance of atypical evolutive patterns.
- Author
-
Humbert O, Cadour N, Paquet M, Schiappa R, Poudenx M, Chardin D, Borchiellini D, Benisvy D, Ouvrier MJ, Zwarthoed C, Schiazza A, Ilie M, Ghalloussi H, Koulibaly PM, Darcourt J, and Otto J
- Subjects
- Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Humans, Immunotherapy, Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography, Positron-Emission Tomography, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung diagnostic imaging, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung therapy, Lung Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Lung Neoplasms therapy
- Abstract
Purpose: This prospective study aimed (1) to assess the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) evolutive patterns to immunotherapy using FDG-PET and (2) to describe their association with clinical outcome., Design: Fifty patients with metastatic NSCLC were included before pembrolizumab or nivolumab initiation. FDG-PET scan was performed at baseline and after 7 weeks of treatment (PET
interim 1) and different criteria/parameters of tumor response were assessed, including PET response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST). If a first PERCIST progressive disease (PD) without clinical worsening was observed, treatment was continued and a subsequent FDG-PET (PETinterim 2) was performed at 3 months of treatment. Pseudo-progression (PsPD) was defined as a PERCIST response/stability on PETinterim 2 after an initial PD. If a second PERCIST PD was assessed on PETinterim 2, a homogeneous progression of lesions (termed immune homogeneous progressive-disease: iPDhomogeneous ) was distinguished from a heterogeneous evolution (termed immune dissociated-response: iDR). A durable clinical benefit (DCB) of immunotherapy was defined as treatment continuation over a 6-month period. The association between PET evolutive profiles and DCB was assessed., Results: Using PERCIST on PETinterim 1, 42% (21/50) of patients showed a response or stable disease, most of them (18/21) reached a DCB. In contrast, 58% (29/50) showed a PD, but more than one-third (11/29) were misclassified as they finally reached a DCB. No standard PETinterim 1 criteria could accurately distinguished responding from non-responding patients. Treatment was continued in 19/29 of patients with a first PERCIST PD; the subsequent PETinterim 2 demonstrated iPDhomogeneous , iDR and PsPD in 42% (8/19), 26% (5/19), and 32% (6/19), respectively. Whereas no patients with iPDhomogeneous experienced a DCB, all patients with iDR and PsPD reached a clinical benefit to immunotherapy., Conclusion: In patients with a first PD on PERCIST and treatment continuation, a subsequent PET identifies more than half of them with iDR and PsPD, both patterns being strongly associated with a clinical benefit of immunotherapy.- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF