Search

ABSTRACTIn this study, information on injectable anticancer drug use and additional fee for enhanced collaboration (AEC) and additional fee for specific drug management guidance 2 (ASD2) claims from the NDB Open Data Japan (NODJ) dataset and the number of patients with cancer according to sex and age from the National Cancer Registry (NCR) dataset were integrated and evaluated to determine the current status and challenges in pharmacist interventions for patients receiving cancer treatment. The NODJ data, including receipt data billed from 2020 to 2021, were obtained from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare website. The use of injectable anticancer drugs decreased relative to the number of cancer patients aged ≥ 75 years compared to those aged < 75 years. Regarding injectable anticancer drug use, the number of AEC claims was similar between men and women, but the number of ASD2 claims was lower in men than in women. The number of times community pharmacists claimed their ASD2 was approximately 5% of the number of times hospital pharmacists claimed their AEC. This study revealed that several patients did not receive sufficient guidance from community pharmacists compared to hospital pharmacists, suggesting a potential insufficiency in the collaboration between the two groups.

This article describes a case of breast cancer post-surgery. During the outpatient chemotherapy, oral mucositis and hair loss caused by chemotherapy drugs led to anxiety, which led to the motivation of nursing care. During the nursing period from February 1st to April 30th, 2021, data were collected through direct nursing, observation, interview, medical record review and social software interaction. The evaluation was based on physical, psychological, social, spiritual levels and combined with human figure drawing evaluation. Analysis established health problems as anxiety, oral mucositis and physical and mental image disorders. The intervention included: using Swanson's caring theory to establish a good relationship between nurses and patients; taking the initiative to care and accompany patients; encourage joint participation in care plans; teach stress relief, oral care and methods to cope with hair loss and appearance changes; introduce cases to share experiences; strengthen positive attitudes and self-confidence, and successfully complete chemotherapy. It is hoped that the human figure drawing evaluation approach will be promoted to the cross-team discussion in the hospital, so as to quickly grasp the patient's problems, enhance the nursing consensus, and promote the nursing results into the family-centered nursing model, so as to improve the quality and effectiveness of nursing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of continuing nursing care team mode on postoperative outpatient chemotherapy patients with pancreatic cancer. Methods: One-hundred patients receiving postoperative outpatient chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer between September 2019 and December 2020 were enrolled in this study and divided into two groups, an intervention group and a control group (n = 50 each), by random number table method or coin tossing method. The patients in the intervention group were followed up using continuing nursing care team mode, while those in the control group were followed up using the traditional telephone follow-up mode. The effects of the two modes on patients' self-care ability, quality of life, anxiety, hospital waiting time, and the nurses' communication ability and self-efficacy were compared and analyzed. Results: The self-care ability and quality of life of the patients in the intervention group were better than those of the control group (p < 0.05), the anxiety score and hospital waiting times were lower than those in the control group (p < 0.05), and the communication ability and general self-efficacy of the nurses were also significantly stronger than those in the control group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The application of the continuing nursing care team mode for follow-up can improve the self-care ability and quality of life of patients, effectively reduce the anxiety and hospital waiting time of outpatient chemotherapy patients, and improve the nurses' communication ability and general self-efficacy. Therefore, this practice is worthy of clinical popularization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Health Sciences / Türkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi is the property of Turkiye Klinikleri and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Introduction: Conversational hypnosis (CH) is known to optimize the management of symptoms resulting from antineoplastic treatment. However, the perception of nurses who have been called upon to integrate this practice into their care has yet to be documented. Goal: Describe how nurses perceive the integration of CH into chemotherapy-related care. Methods: Individual interviews and an iterative analysis were conducted with six nurses who had previous experience in CH in an outpatient oncology clinic. Findings: Six themes emerged: 1) the outpatient oncology clinic, a saturated care setting; 2) the key elements supporting the integration of CH into care; 3) an added value for patients; 4) a positive and rewarding experience for nurses; 5) collateral benefits; and 6) CH, an approach that warrants consideration amid the pandemic. Conclusion: These findings shed light on nurses' unique point of view regarding the challenges and benefits of integrating CH into oncology care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To characterize and compare both the outcome and cost of treatment of outpatient (OP) and inpatient (IP) ifosfamide therapy. Methods: A single-center retrospective chart review of patients 18 years and older receiving ifosfamide therapy. The primary endpoint compares and evaluates the side effect profiles of ifosfamide-treated patients in the OP/IP settings. The adverse event grading system was characterized using the CTCAE Version 5.0. The highest grade was documented per cycle. The secondary endpoint of this study compares the costs of OP/IP therapy. It was assumed that the cost of medication was equivalent for IP/OP treatments. The cost saved with OP administration was determined by the average cost of hospital stay for IP admission. Results: Ifosfamide therapy of 86 patients (57 OP, 29 IP) was reviewed. The predominant OP regimens were doxorobucin-ifosfamide-mesna (AIM) with 43.9% and ifosfamide-etoposide (IE) with 29.8%. Grade 4 anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia were most frequent in IP vs OP therapies (22.9% IP vs 4.3% OP, 21.6% IP vs 9.2% OP, and 22.8% IP vs 19.6% OP respectively). Neutropenic fever (NF) occurred in 20 OP patients which were predominantly treated with AIM or IE and led to average hospital stay of 6 days. Neurotoxicity, treated with methylene blue (MB) occurred in 4 OP patients. OP therapy saved a total of 783 hospital days, leading to a cost savings of $2,103,921. Conclusions: Transitioning ifosfamide to the OP setting is feasible for academic and community infusion centers with the OP administration being safe, well-tolerated, and associated with decreased total cost of care. The current processes allow for safe transition of chemotherapy of chemotherapy under times of COVID. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The Distress Thermometer (DT) is worldwide the most commonly used instrument for quick screening of emotional burden in patients with cancer. In order to validate the Greek version of the DT in the Greek population we aimed to explore the capacity of the DT to identify patients with comorbid depressive diagnosis. Methods We analyzed the routinely collected clinical data from 152 patients with cancer who had been evaluated by the consultation-liaison psychiatric service and had received a diagnosis of either depressive disorder or no psychiatric diagnosis. The score of the DT accompanied by the list of problems in the Problem List, the depression status, and the clinical and demographic characteristics entered the data sheet. Results The ROC analysis revealed that the DT achieved a significant discrimination with an area under the curve of 0.79. At a cut-off point of 4, the DT identified 85% of the patients with an ICD-10 depressive diagnosis (sensitivity) and 60% of the patients without a psychiatric diagnosis (specificity). The positive predictive value was 44%, the negative predictive value 92% and the diagnostic odd ratio 8.88. Fatigue and emotional difficulties were the most commonly reported problems by the patients. Conclusion The Greek version of the DT has a sufficient overall accuracy in classifying patients regarding the existence of depressive disorders, in the oncology setting. Therefore, it can be considered as a valid initial screening tool for depression in patients with cancer; patients scoring ≥4 should be assessed by a more thorough mental evaluation.

Objective: Breast cancer survivors are increasing in number among survivors of all types of cancer, and survivors returning to work are extremely important. The development of outpatient chemotherapy has increased the working population of patients undergoing cancer therapy. Consequently, a significant number of breast cancer survivors experience physical, psychological, and social problems. This study aimed to clarify differences in concerns among patients with breast cancer receiving outpatient chemotherapy according to their employment status. Methods: Twenty-eight patients with breast cancer undergoing outpatient chemotherapy were recruited. A questionnaire was used to survey the attributes, employment status, and levels of concern in these patients based on the Cancer-chemotherapy Concerns Rating Scale (CCRS). Data from three groups (employed full time, employed part-time, and unemployed) were analyzed using multiple comparison tests. Results: The patients' mean age was (55.1 ± 9.9) years. According to the CCRS findings, the following three parameters differed between the three groups: scores for the items “I always think about my disease” (employed vs. unemployed, P = 0.005) and “I can't work (housework/schoolwork)” (employed full time vs. part time, P = 0.045), and scores for the “self-existence” subscale (employed vs. unemployed, P = 0.024). Conclusions: This study revealed the characteristics of concerns in patients with breast cancer according to their employment status. Being able to continue working is considered to enhance the social health of these patients. Predicting concerns in employed patients will help gain perspective in early nursing interventions.

This study aimed to determine response rates, overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS) and toxicity profile of an outpatient chemotherapy regimen based on gemcitabine and vinorelbine (GV) for relapsed childhood Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). This was a retrospective study that included 41 patients up to the age of 18 years with relapsed HL. Twelve patients (29%) had primary progressive disease (PPD), 6 (15%) had early relapse (ER) and 23 (56%) had late relapse (LR). The overall initial response rate was 83% (LR: 87%, ER: 83%, PPD: 75%. p-value:.2). Three-year combined OS was 80% (LR: 89%, ER: 80%, PPD: 65%. p-value:.07) and EFS 71% (LR: 86%, ER: 62%, PPD: 47%. p-value:.01). There were no toxic deaths. Febrile neutropenia was observed in four patients (9.6%) and lung toxicity in 1 patient (2.4%). This study suggests that outpatient GV is an effective and low toxicity salvage regimen for relapsed childhood HL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Chemotherapy regimens historically have required admission of the patient to the hospital for extended infusions running over multiple days to complete each cycle of therapy. With the evolution of monitoring strategies readily available, a renaissance in patient care and healthcare cost utilization is necessary as transitioning the administration of these agents to the outpatient setting is seemingly achievable and is potentially more cost-effective. Purpose: This evaluation sought to primarily measure cost-savings for an institution by transitioning inpatient chemotherapy regimens to the outpatient setting. Secondary outcomes evaluated the effect of this transition on overall patient length of stay, prevalence of adverse effects, and overall chemotherapy schedule adherence as a result of implementing transitions in sites of care. Barriers to receiving care in the outpatient setting were assessed by evaluating the acuity of performance status as well as distance from the hospital. Methods: This single-center retrospective, quantitative chart and expense analysis evaluated patients receiving rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin (R-EPOCH) or rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (R-ICE) chemotherapy regimens based on treatment setting at a single institution. Included patients were treated at the University of Chicago Medical Center. Those receiving inpatient-only management as compared with patients who received therapy in outpatient settings were compared in a matched cohort analysis. The control group was matched from the period before transition of therapy was instituted between November 2014 and November 2015, with those patients transitioned to outpatient therapy (December 2015 to November 2016), using demographic, diagnostic, treatment, and clinical status data to assure group similarity. Mean cost of therapy was compared between inpatient and outpatient regimens. Descriptive and demographic categorical data were compared using the Fisher's exact test. Continuous data were evaluated using the Student's t test. A significance level of alpha <0.05 was used for all analysis. Results: The cost of R-EPOCH therapy represented a significant difference across groups. R-ICE therapy similarly saw significant cost differences between inpatient and outpatient groups. If this was made standard of care for qualifying patients a retrospective annualized estimation of $466,507.85 with R-EPOCH therapy and $205,977.60 for R-ICE therapy could have been saved if this was utilized for patients who previously received their therapy as an inpatient. Conclusion: The population of patients cared for at the University of Chicago Medicine during this time-period qualified for outpatient treatment for those treated with R-EPOCH and R-ICE regimens with no significantly identifiable prohibitive barriers between groups. As no significant complications manifested, it is reasonable to continue transitioning patients receiving these regimens to the outpatient setting where appropriate. R-EPOCH and R-ICE therapies were shown to be reasonable outpatient therapy while providing significant cost-savings for the institution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this study, information on injectable anticancer drug use and additional fee for enhanced collaboration (AEC) and additional fee for specific drug management guidance 2 (ASD2) claims from the NDB Open Data Japan (NODJ) dataset and the number of patients with cancer according to sex and age from the National Cancer Registry (NCR) dataset were integrated and evaluated to determine the current status and challenges in pharmacist interventions for patients receiving cancer treatment. The NODJ data, including receipt data billed from 2020 to 2021, were obtained from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare website. The use of injectable anticancer drugs decreased relative to the number of cancer patients aged ≥ 75 years compared to those aged < 75 years. Regarding injectable anticancer drug use, the number of AEC claims was similar between men and women, but the number of ASD2 claims was lower in men than in women. The number of times community pharmacists claimed their ASD2 was approximately 5% of the number of times hospital pharmacists claimed their AEC. This study revealed that several patients did not receive sufficient guidance from community pharmacists compared to hospital pharmacists, suggesting a potential insufficiency in the collaboration between the two groups., Competing Interests: MI is an employee of Kifune Pharmacy. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.)

The adverse chapter of cancer chemotherapy negatively impact QOL, and pharmacists play a key role in improving QOL by providing optimal drug therapy through pharmaceutical interventions. Although outpatient cancer chemotherapy is now common, the impact of pharmaceutical interventions from a QOL perspective has not been thoroughly studied. Therefore, this study investigated the impact and cost-effectiveness of pharmaceutical interventions on QOL using the EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) and Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Patients Treated with Anticancer Drugs (QOL-ACD). The study was conducted between 2013 and 2015 on 39 patients who underwent their first outpatient chemotherapy for breast cancer at Gifu Municipal Hospital. The results showed that pharmaceutical interventions improved social relationship QOL in patients experiencing fatigue during the first cycle and enhanced psychological QOL in patients with adverse events of nausea during the second cycle. Furthermore, the maximum incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was found to be 1.3 million yen per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) according to cost utility analysis. The pharmaceutical interventions by pharmacists in outpatient cancer chemotherapy improve QOL, and the ICER remains well below the Japanese threshold, signifying clear medical and economic benefits.

Patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who have failed to achieve complete remission with first-line therapy can subsequently receive salvage therapy. However, there is no definite consensus on the use of salvage therapy, and little information on the optimal treatment regimen. The present study retrospectively analyzed data from 131 patients diagnosed with DLBCL between April 2002 and November 2017 who relapsed and received salvage therapy. Primary treatment included R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens. The most common salvage regimen was R-DeVIC (42%), followed by R-ESHAP (23%), other aggressive regimens (12%) and palliative therapy (23%). The median overall survival (OS) was 45.7 months for R-DeVIC, 41.8 months for palliative therapy, 29.4 months for R-ESHAP, and 28.5 months for aggressive regimens (P=0.937). A total of 25 patients underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and the OS was 75.6 months for these patients compared with 33.5 months (range, 25.6–45.6 months) for patients who did not undergo ASCT (P=0.033). Following the establishment of an outpatient chemotherapy unit in 2014, R-DeVIC use became more common, increasing from 37% prior to 2014 to 46% after 2014, whereas R-ESHAP use decreased (31 to 17%). The present study did not identify the optimal salvage regimen for patients with DLBCL. However, salvage ASCT improved the outcome, and regimens administered via peripheral veins were demonstrated to be more common in outpatient chemotherapy settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Collaboration between pharmacists, doctors, and nurses in outpatient treatment is beneficial; however, such services are limited in Japan due to the lack of a healthcare reimbursement fee for outpatient pharmacy services at outpatient clinic. Objective: We evaluated the impact of a service in which clinical pharmacists collaborated with an oncologist at an outpatient clinic in the treatment of adverse drug reactions in outpatient cancer chemotherapy. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using patients' medical records and treatment diaries. Subjects were patients who received outpatient chemotherapy via a clinical pharmacist collaboration service provided by six outpatient pharmacists and an oncologist at an outpatient clinic between June and August 2016. Results: During the study period, the total number of outpatient services was 2508, with 2055 (81%) related to chemotherapy. The six outpatient pharmacists provided interventions to 498 of the 2055 cases (24%). Of the 498 interventions, 103 (20%), in addition to oncologist's prescription, were suggested treatments for adverse drug reactions due to cancer chemotherapy. Oncologists approved a total of 82 prescription suggestions from pharmacists (79%) to 63 patients. Fifty-seven percent (n = 47) of the adverse drug reactions were improved following the pharmacists' suggested prescriptions. Conclusions: This is the first study to clarify the benefits of outpatient pharmacy services in which pharmacists collaborate with oncologists at an outpatient clinic for the management of adverse drug reactions in cancer patients in Japan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Ambulatory administration of chemotherapy provides benefit to patients and institutions alike. We hypothesized that transitioning rituximab, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin (R-EPOCH) from an inpatient to ambulatory setting would reduce inpatient bed days and overall healthcare costs. The purpose of this effort was to create a guideline that would transition R-EPOCH to the ambulatory setting. To assess institutional benefit, we assessed inpatient bed days saved and financial impact. Methods A single center, retrospective analysis of inpatient R-EPOCH administration from January 2013 to December 2015 defined the need for medication use guidelines for ambulatory R-EPOCH administration. While this guideline targeted a reduction in inpatient bed days, it also created desired staff-and-patient education on R-EPOCH. Multidisciplinary collaboration enabled this comprehensive approach to outpatient chemotherapy administration. Results The 42 patients included received 147 cycles of R-EPOCH. Administration was primarily inpatient, amounting to 107 cycles and 799 inpatient days. Concurrently, 40 cycles of R-EPOCH were administered to 11 patients in the ambulatory setting. Only two patients received all cycles as outpatient; the other nine patients received chemotherapy in both settings. Financial analysis showed a 53% reduction in drug acquisition cost and 30% reduction in direct costs with ambulatory R-EPOCH administration. Based on our projection, after guideline implementation, 12 patients will be eligible for ambulatory R-EPOCH annually, resulting in a savings of 360 bed days and approximately $650,000 per year. Conclusion Transitioning R-EPOCH is a viable option to significantly decrease inpatient bed days and overall healthcare costs. Multidisciplinary collaboration is vital to successfully transitioning regimens to the ambulatory setting and to establishing consistent support for ambulatory administration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose. Implementation of a pharmacy-managed program for the transition of chemotherapy to the outpatient setting is described. Summary. The University of Arizona Cancer Center and Banner-University Medical Center Tucson are affiliated not-for-profit academic medical centers in Tucson, Arizona, whose facilities include a hospital and ambulatory care clinics that maintain 3 outpatient infusion centers. The cancer center pharmacy currently employs 25 pharmacists, with 4 clinical pharmacists serving both the inpatient and outpatient treatment sites. A multidisciplinary team of staff members was assembled to address the transition of chemotherapy from inpatient to outpatient that included physicians, ambulatory clinical oncology pharmacists, finance, social workers, pharmacy staff, nursing staff, and information technology. The program was initiated in May 2014, with a 2-year postimplementation evaluation of our transition of chemotherapy to the outpatient setting. Chemotherapy order sets were developed in our electronic medical record for transitioning rituximab to the outpatient setting for inpatient chemotherapy orders as well as transitioning leukemia, lymphoma, and solid tumor chemotherapy regimens to be administered in the outpatient setting. Eighteen rituximab-containing regimens and 14 chemotherapy protocols were switched to the outpatient setting, with numerous variants of these regimens also created for outpatient only administration. The realized savings for high-cost chemotherapy transitioned to the outpatient setting with rituximab and clofarabine was $1,902,890. Over 747 inpatient bed days were saved, with an approximated cost savings to the health system of $1,402,866, with a cumulative cost savings to our health system of $3,305,756. Conclusion. This model for transitioning chemotherapy from the hospital to the outpatient setting enhanced access to care, decreased bed utilization in the hospital, and improved clinical and financial metrics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Planning the use of chemotherapy drugs in outpatient treatment is a complex problem due to the variability of cancer, resulting in different chemotherapy protocols. This process involves factors such as the cyclical nature of treatment protocols and clinical resources. Within this context, an optimization model is needed to plan the use of chemotherapy drugs in the preparation of doses for patient treatment, considering the operational particularities of treatment centers. This study proposed a linear programming model based on the multiple knapsack problem, in order to optimize the combination of different vials of chemotherapy drugs, minimizing the total cost of treatment. The model, based on the daily schedule of patients, provides the best combination of drug vials and supports the preparation process of each dose prescribed by the doctor for each patient, respecting the treatment protocol and resource limitations. The model was implemented in the CPLEX 12.9.0 application, and the computational tests were performed with real data. The results demonstrated that the costs when applying the model were 5% lower when compared to the current manner in which the oncology pharmacy combines the drugs vials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The adequacy of pain management for individuals with cancer who receive outpatient chemotherapy is unclear. The primary objective of this study was to assess pain prevalence and intensity in such patients. The secondary objectives included assessment of pain management with the pain management index (PMI) and exploration of predictors of inadequate pain management.Methods: Cancer patients who received outpatient chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients were required to complete questionnaires covering demographic data and including the Brief Pain Inventory and the Distress Thermometer and Impact Thermometer. The PMI score was determined twice with an interval of at least 3 weeks.Results: Of the 740 patients enrolled in the study, 524 individuals (70.8%) completed all questionnaires. Totals of 282 patients (53.8%) and 264 patients (50.4%) reported pain at baseline and follow-up, respectively, with ∼14% of patients having moderate or severe pain at each assessment. Totals of 365 patients (69.7%) at baseline and 320 patients (61.1%) at follow-up reported pain or were prescribed analgesics, with the rate of inadequate pain management for these patients being 39.7 and 51.6%, respectively. Multivariable analysis for 418 patients (79.8%) who had pain or required analgesics at baseline or follow-up (or both) revealed that the most significant predictor of inadequate pain management was depressive state.Conclusions: Pain in cancer patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy is prevalent and at risk for undertreatment. Pain management should be assessed on a regular basis and is likely to be improved by screening for depression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]