Search

A prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicentre (n = 5) study was conducted to compare the influence of either a 100 or 200 IU daily fixed-dose regimen of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) on the number of oocytes retrieved and the total dose used in down-regulated women undergoing ovarian stimulation. Fertilization was done by intracytoplasmic sperm injection or conventional in-vitro fertilization. A total of 199 women were treated with FSH, 101 subjects with 100 IU and 98 subjects with 200 IU. In subjects of the 200 IU treatment group, significantly more oocytes were retrieved compared to the 100 IU group (10.6 versus 6.2 oocytes, P < 0.001). The total dose needed to develop at least three follicles with a diameter of ≥17 mm was significantly lower in the 100 IU treatment group (1114 IU versus 1931 IU, P < 0.001). In the low-dose group, significantly lower serum concentrations of oestradiol, progesterone and FSH were observed at the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration. Although more cycle cancellations due to low response were seen in the 100 IU group (n = 24 versus n = 3), the clinical pregnancy rate per started cycle was similar (24.7% in the 100 IU group versus 23.3% in the 200 IU group). In the high-dose group, more side-effects, in particular more cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, were noted. It is concluded that compared to 200 IU, the use of a 100 IU fixed dose is less efficacious in terms of the number of oocytes retrieved, but more efficient as indicated by a lower total dose. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The clinical assessment of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH; Puregon) in assisted reproduction technologies such as in-vitro fertilization (IVF) has probably been the most extensive clinical trial programme ever performed for the evaluation of a new fertility drug. It started with a pilot study to evaluate the potential of rFSH to stimulate the ovaries in the absence of luteinizing hormone (LH) - using various gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists. After it became clear that FSH-induced steroidogenesis was not jeopardized even after severe pituitary supression, comparisons between rFSH and urinary FSH or human menopausal gonadotrophins were made using different GnRH agonists or no agonists at all. In addition, the effects of the route of administration (s.c. or i.m.) were assessed. The study with the strongest statistical power to truly assess clinically relevant differences between rFSH and urinary FSH included ~1000 patient cycles. It indicated that after rFSH treatment, significantly more oocytes were retrieved, more embryos obtained and, as a result, more pregnancies achieved when the results of the cryoprogramme were included. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Single-dose and multiple-rising dose studies of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) in hypogonadotrophic male and female volunteers demonstrated that the rate of FSH absorption after i.m. injection is higher in men than in women. In the absence of endogenous FSH, a correlation between serum FSH and body weight became apparent. The elimination half-life of rFSH was not different between the sexes and was comparable with urinary FSH. However, the in-vitro bio:immuno ratio of serum FSH was significantly higher after the administration of rFSH than after urinary FSH. When rFSH was administered daily with a fixed dose, steady state levels were reached within 3-5 days. Serum FSH concentrations increased in a dose-dependent manner when the daily dose was increased weekly over 3 weeks from 75 to 225 IU. In hypogonadotrophic women, rFSH induced normal follicular growth whereas oestrogen synthesis was impaired. In women pituitary suppressed by a high-dose oral contraceptive, the daily administration of 150 IU rFSH for 1 week induced more and larger antral follicles than the same regimen with urinary FSH, whereas the serum immunoactive FSH concentrations measured 24 h after each dosing were similar. It is concluded that even though equal or lower serum immunoactive FSH concentrations were obtained following the administration of rFSH compared with urinary FSH, circulating bioactivity FSH concentrations were higher. Therefore, the conventional idea that serum immunoreactive FSH correlates positively with the magnitude of the ovarian response should be reconsidered. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

A randomized clinical trial was performed comparing recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH, Puregon, n = 54) and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG, Humegon, n = 35) in infertile women undergoing in-vitro fertilization without the use of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist. Most patients had a tubal or idiopathic infertility, the latter always longer than 4 years' duration. Patients with sperm abnormalities were excluded. None of the between-group differences in treatment outcome was statistically significant. In the rFSH group, a mean number of 11.2 oocytes was retrieved compared with 8.3 in the HMG group. Ongoing pregnancy rates per started cycle were higher in the rFSH group (22.2%) than in the HMG group (17.1%). Implantation rates were 27.5% in the rFSH group in comparison with 16.7% in the HMG group. In the rFSH group, a mean total dose of 1410 IU during 6.2 days was administered compared with 1365 IU in 6.0 days in the HMG group. Oestradiol concentrations on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration were 3889 pmol/l in the rFSH group and 3145 pmol/l in the HMG group. In 15 subjects (rFSH: n = 9, 16.7%; HMG: n = 6, 17.1%) luteinizing hormone concentrations higher than 10 IU/l were seen during stimulation. In two of them, both from the rFSH group, ongoing pregnancies were achieved. The results indicate that rFSH (Puregon) is at least as efficacious as HMG and that acceptable pregnancy rates can be achieved without the use of a GnRH agonist. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Obstetrical complications, often referred to as the "great obstetrical syndromes," are among the most common global causes of mortality and morbidity in young women and their infants. However, treatments for these syndromes are underdeveloped compared with other fields of medicine and are urgently needed. This current paucity of treatments for obstetrical complications is a reflection of the challenges of drug development in pregnancy. The appetite of pharmaceutical companies to invest in research for obstetrical syndromes is generally reduced by concerns for maternal, fetal, and infant safety, poor definition, and high-risk regulatory paths toward product approval. Notably, drug candidates require large investments for development with an unguaranteed return on investment. Furthermore, the discovery of promising drug candidates is hampered by a poor understanding of the pathophysiology of obstetrical syndromes and their uniqueness to human pregnancies. This limits translational extrapolation and de-risking strategies in preclinical studies, as available for other medical areas, compounded with limited fetal safety monitoring to capture early prenatal adverse reactions. In addition, the ethical review committees are reluctant to approve the inclusion of pregnant women in trials, and in the absence of regulatory guidance in obstetrics, clinical development programs are subject to unpredictable regulatory paths. To develop effective and safe drugs for pregnancy complications, substantial commitment, and investment in research for innovative therapies are needed in parallel with the creation of an enabling ethical, legislative, and guidance framework. Solutions are proposed to enable stakeholders to work with a common set of expectations to facilitate progress in this medical discipline. Addressing this significant unmet need to advance maternal and possibly perinatal health requires the involvement of all stakeholders and specifically patients, couples, and clinicians facing pregnancy complications in the dearth of appropriate therapies. This paper focused on the key pharmaceutical research and development challenges to achieve effective and safe treatments for obstetrical syndromes., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In reproductive medicine, the needs and desires of infertility patients drive future research, with the most important outcome being live birth of a baby. Large, multicenter, randomized clinical trials are considered the best research tool to evaluate the effectiveness of medical interventions, but they can often take a long time to find definitive answers. Advances in individual participant data (IPD) and network meta-analysis have enabled research questions to be answered more quickly, but better planning could streamline this process further. To harmonize research findings that are taking place globally in this way, it is crucial that the same outcomes are collected in clinical trials conducted in reproductive medicine. Furthermore, the conduct of clinical trials often requires collaboration on an international scale; however, individual countries have their own processes for research prioritization and delivery. We describe the perspective of high- and low-resourced settings and industry as well as the mechanisms of prioritization and coordination that are in place in different settings. In addition, we discuss the importance of the patient perspective, which can help shape the research question, clinical trial design, and the logistical operations of trial delivery. The need for increased global collaboration and coalitions within and between stakeholders is evident for the research community to accelerate advances and maximize benefits in reproductive medicine., (Copyright © 2020 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: During peer review, submitted manuscripts are scrutinised by independent experts to assist journal editors in their decision-making and to help improve the quality of articles. In this retrospective cohort study, peer review comments for drug trials submitted to medical journals were analysed to investigate whether there is a relation between the content of these comments and sponsorship, direction of results and decision about acceptance., Design/setting: Descriptive content analysis of reviewer comments made on manuscripts on drug trials submitted to eight medical journals (January 2010-April 2012). For each manuscript, the number of reviewers, decision about acceptance, sponsorship and direction of results were extracted. Reviewer comments were classified using a predefined checklist., Results: Reviewer reports for 246 manuscripts were assessed. Industry-sponsored trials were more likely to receive comments about lack of novelty (8.9%) than industry-supported (2.5%) and non-industry trials (6.1%, overall p=0.038). Non-industry trials more often received comments about poor experimental design (69.7%) than industry-supported (58.8%) and industry-sponsored trials (52.9%, overall p=0.019). Non-industry trials were also more likely to receive comments regarding inappropriate statistical analyses (28.4%) than industry-supported (23.5%) and industry-sponsored trials (15.1%, overall p=0.006). Manuscripts with negative results were more likely to receive comments about inappropriate conclusions (29.3%) than those with positive results (18.9%, p=0.010). Rejected manuscripts had more often received comments on the research question not being clinically relevant (7.8%) than accepted manuscripts (1.6%, p=0.002), and also on lack of novelty (8.3% vs 2.6%, p=0.008) and poor experimental design (68.6% vs 50.5%, p<0.001)., Conclusions: Reviewers identified fewer shortcomings regarding design and statistical analyses in industry-related trials, but commented more often on a lack of novelty in industry-sponsored trials. Negative trial results did not significantly influence the nature of comments other than appropriateness of the conclusion. Manuscript acceptance was primarily related to the research question and methodological robustness of studies., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.)

Objectives: To assess whether journals are more likely to reject manuscripts with differences between information in registries and articles. We compared differences by sponsorship and assessed whether selective reporting favored publication of significant outcomes., Study Design and Setting: Drug trials submitted to eight journals (January 2010-April 2012) were included. Publication status, primary outcomes, enrollment, and sponsorship were extracted. Primary outcomes and enrollment in registries and registration timing were reviewed. Prospective registration included registration before study start. Consistency between registered and reported information was evaluated., Results: For 226 submitted manuscripts, primary outcomes were specified in both article and registry. Sixty six of 226 (29.2%) had primary outcome differences; 14 of 66 manuscripts with differences (21.2%) and 46 of 160 without differences (28.8%) were accepted. Fifty manuscripts (22.4%) had sample size differences; 10 of 50 with differences (20.0%) and 49 of 173 without differences (28.3%) were accepted. Industry-sponsored trials had less differences and were more often prospectively registered. After adjustment for sponsorship, differences and/or retrospective registration were not associated with decreased chance of acceptance (odds ratio 0.56; 95% confidence interval: 0.27, 1.13). Primary outcome differences favored significant outcomes in 49% of manuscripts., Conclusion: Differences between registered and reported information are not decisive for rejection. Editors should assess consistency between registries and articles to address selective reporting., (Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Submission of study protocols to research ethics committees (RECs) constitutes one of the earliest stages at which planned trials are documented in detail. Previous studies have investigated the amendments requested from researchers by RECs, but the type of issues raised during REC review have not been compared by sponsor type. The objective of this study was to identify recurring shortcomings in protocols of drug trials based on REC comments and to assess whether these were more common among industry-sponsored or non-industry trials., Methods: Retrospective analysis of 226 protocols of drug trials approved in 2010-2011 by three RECs affiliated to academic medical centres in The Netherlands. For each protocol, information on sponsorship, number of participating centres, participating countries, study phase, registration status of the study drug, and type and number of subjects was retrieved. REC comments were extracted from decision letters sent to investigators after review and were classified using a predefined checklist that was based on legislation and guidelines on clinical drug research and previous literature., Results: Most protocols received comments regarding participant information and consent forms (n = 182, 80.5%), methodology and statistical analyses (n = 160, 70.8%), and supporting documentation, including trial agreements and certificates of insurance (n = 154, 68.1%). Of the submitted protocols, 122 (54.0%) were non-industry and 104 (46.0%) were industry-sponsored trials. Non-industry trials more often received comments on subject selection (n = 44, 36.1%) than industry-sponsored trials (n = 18, 17.3%; RR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.47), and on methodology and statistical analyses (n = 95, 77.9% versus n = 65, 62.5%, respectively; RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.37). Non-industry trials less often received comments on supporting documentation (n = 72, 59.0%) than industry-sponsored trials (n = 82, 78.8%; RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.95)., Conclusions: RECs identified important ethical and methodological shortcomings in protocols of both industry-sponsored and non-industry drug trials. Investigators, especially of non-industry trials, should better prepare their research protocols in order to facilitate the ethical review process.

Background: Publication bias is generally ascribed to authors and sponsors failing to submit studies with negative results, but may also occur after submission. We evaluated whether submitted manuscripts on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with drugs are more likely to be accepted if they report positive results., Methods: Manuscripts submitted from January 2010 through April 2012 to one general medical journal (BMJ) and seven specialty journals (Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Gut, Heart, Thorax, Diabetologia, and Journal of Hepatology) were included, if at least one study arm assessed the efficacy or safety of a drug and a statistical test was used to evaluate treatment effects. Publication status was retrospectively retrieved from submission systems or provided by journals. Sponsorship and trial results were extracted from manuscripts and classified according to predefined criteria. Main outcome measure was acceptance for publication., Results: Of 15,972 manuscripts submitted, 472 (3.0%) were drug RCTs, of which 98 (20.8%) were published. Among submitted drug RCTs, 287 (60.8%) had positive and 185 (39.2%) negative results. Of these, 60 (20.9%) and 38 (20.5%), respectively, were published. Manuscripts on non-industry trials (n = 213) reported positive results in 138 (64.8%) manuscripts, compared to 71 (47.7%) on industry-supported trials (n = 149), and 78 (70.9%) on industry-sponsored trials (n = 110). Twenty-seven (12.7%) non-industry trials were published, compared to 27 (18.1%) industry-supported and 44 (40.0%) industry-sponsored trials. After adjustment for other trial characteristics, manuscripts reporting positive results were not more likely to be published (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.66). Submission to specialty journals, sample size, multicentre status, journal impact factor, and corresponding authors from Europe or US were significantly associated with publication., Conclusions: For the selected journals, there was no tendency to preferably publish manuscripts on drug RCTs that reported positive results, suggesting that publication bias may occur mainly prior to submission.

Background: Numerous studies on publication bias in clinical drug research have been undertaken, particularly on the association between sponsorship and favourable outcomes. However, no standardized methodology for the classification of outcomes and sponsorship has been described. Dissimilarities and ambiguities in this assessment impede the ability to compare and summarize results of studies on publication bias. To guide authors undertaking such studies, this paper provides recommendations for a uniform assessment of publication bias related to funding source., Methods and Results: As part of ongoing research into publication bias, 472 manuscripts on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with drugs, submitted to eight medical journals from January 2010 through April 2012, were reviewed. Information on trial results and sponsorship was extracted from manuscripts. During the start of this evaluation, several problems related to the classification of outcomes, inclusion of post-hoc analyses and follow-up studies of RCTs in the study sample, and assessment of the role of the funding source were encountered. A comprehensive list of recommendations addressing these problems was composed. To assess internal validity, reliability and usability of these recommendations were tested through evaluation of manuscripts submitted to journals included in our study., Conclusions: The proposed recommendations represent a first step towards a uniform method of classifying trial outcomes and sponsorship. This is essential to draw valid conclusions on the role of the funding source in publication bias and will ensure consistency across future studies.

The starting dose of gonadotrophin for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) or ovulation induction (OI) must be individualized and has considerable impact on outcomes (pregnancy and adverse events). Five large randomized, controlled trials have compared fixed doses of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) for COS for assisted reproductive technology (ART). Among young women, a fixed dosage of 200 IU/day (versus 100 IU/day) yielded more oocytes and more transferable embryos. Thus, if surplus embryos can be cryopreserved, it could result in a higher cumulative pregnancy rate. However, no clear dose-response relationship was evident among older women receiving either 150 or 250 IU/day. Another randomized, controlled trial showed that a low-dose step-up OI protocol with weekly increments of 25 IU/day of rFSH was more effective and more efficient than a regimen with 50-IU/day increments. Research to develop a normogram for the optimal starting dose of rFSH for individual patients is under way.

Recombinant follicle stimulating hormone has been available now for almost 10 years and many couples have benefited from its use. Its clinical efficacy, purity and safety profile have been extensively documented in numerous publications. Because of growing public concerns on the safety of gonadotrophins extracted from human urine, the future will lie in the recombinant technology, which will also enable the design of more convenient tailor-made gonadotrophins.

Background: Studies with the GnRH antagonist ganirelix in assisted reproduction have indicated that compared with traditional GnRH agonist downregulation protocols, slightly fewer oocytes are retrieved. In this study it was investigated whether an increase in the starting dose of recombinant FSH (rFSH) could compensate for this loss., Methods: A randomized, double-blind, multicentre clinical trial comparing a starting dose of 150 and 200 IU of rFSH (follitropin beta), in women undergoing treatment with the GnRH antagonist ganirelix., Results: In total, 257 women were treated with rFSH, of whom 131 received 150 IU and 126 women 200 IU. Overall, 10.3 oocytes were retrieved in the 150 IU group and 11.9 in the 200 IU group (P=0.051). This difference became significant when women with cycle cancellation before HCG administration were excluded. Nearly 500 IU of additional rFSH was given in the high-dose group (2014 versus 1541 IU). In the low-dose group, 4.6 high-quality embryos were obtained compared with 4.5 in the high-dose group. Vital pregnancy rates were similar (31 and 25% in the 150 and 200 IU-treated women, respectively). Serum concentrations of FSH, estradiol and progesterone were significantly higher in the high-dose group at day 6 of rFSH treatment and on the day of HCG administration. In the high-dose group, serum LH concentrations were higher at day 6 of rFSH treatment but lower at the day of HCG administration., Conclusion: By increasing the starting dose from 150 to 200 IU of rFSH, slightly more oocytes can be retrieved in GnRH antagonist protocols for assisted reproduction. However, because this did not translate into a higher number of high quality embryos, the clinical relevance of such a dose increase may be questioned.

The gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix has recently become available to clinicians. Its indication, prevention of premature luteinizing hormone surges in assisted reproduction programmes, has been investigated extensively in numerous studies. This article summarizes the major results from pharmacokinetics studies, a double-blind dose-finding trial and three large-scale phase III randomized clinical trials, comparing ganirelix and the most commonly used gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists, buserelin,leuprolide and triptorelin, in a long protocol. It is concluded that controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with ganirelix offers significant advantages in terms of convenience of treatment as reflected in a considerably reduced treatment period.Safety and tolerance as well as overall clinical outcome are good.

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of women undergoing IVF treatment with recombinant FSH (rFSH) in comparison with highly purified urinary FSH (uFSH-HP) and human menopausal gonadotrophins (HMG)., Methods: A decision-analytic model was used to estimate cost-effectiveness ratios for 'the average cost per ongoing pregnancy' and 'incremental cost per additional pregnancy' for women entering into IVF treatment for a maximum of three cycles. The model was constructed based on a previously published large prospective randomized clinical trial comparing rFSH and uFSH-HP. Where necessary, these data were augmented with a combination of expert opinion, evidence from the literature and observational data relating to the management and cost of IVF treatment in the UK. The cost of rFSH, uFSH-HP and HMG were obtained from National Health Service list prices in the UK., Results: The model predicted a cumulative pregnancy rate after three cycles of 57.1% for rFSH and 44.4% for both uFSH-HP and HMG. The cost of IVF treatment was 5135 pounds sterling for rFSH, 4806 pounds sterling for uFSH-HP and 4202 pounds sterling for HMG. When assessed in association with outcomes, the average cost per ongoing pregnancy was more favourable with rFSH (8992 pounds sterling) than with either uFSH-HP (10 834 pounds sterling) or HMG (9472 pounds sterling). The incremental cost per additional pregnancy was 2583 pounds sterling using rFSH instead of uFSH-HP and 7321 pounds sterling using rFSH instead of HMG. These results were robust to changes in the baseline assumptions of the model., Conclusion: rFSH is a cost-effective treatment strategy in ovulation induction prior to IVF.

The effect of 100 and 200 IU per day recombinant FSH (rFSH) on numbers of oocytes retrieved and the total dose used in ovarian stimulation before intracytoplasmic sperm injection was investigated in a double-blind, randomized multicentre trial. A total of 91 women was treated with a low-dose protocol and 88 with a high-dose regimen at five centres. For each started cycle, significantly more oocytes were retrieved in the 200 IU group than in 100 IU group (12.0 versus 5.7, P < 0.001); total rFSH consumption was 1121 and 1875 IU in the low- and high-dose groups respectively. Significant variations were noted between centres with regard to numbers of oocytes collected per started cycle, ranging from 2.8 to 7.2 in the 100 IU group and from 9.0 to 19.1 in the high-dose group. Exploratory analyses of secondary outcomes suggested there were no differences in vital pregnancy rates per started cycle (19.2 versus 16.9%) and per embryo transfer (26.2 versus 19.3%) in the low- and high dose groups respectively. There were four hospitalizations due to ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, all in the 200 IU group.

A prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicentre (n = 6) study was conducted to compare the influence of either a 150 or 250 IU daily fixed-dose regimen of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (FSH, Puregon) on the number of oocytes retrieved and the total dose used in down-regulated women between 30 and 39 years of age undergoing ovarian stimulation. In all, 138 women were treated with recombinant FSH, 67 with 150 IU and 71 with 250 IU. The number of oocytes retrieved in the low-dose group was 9.1 compared to 10.6 in the high-dose group (not significant). In the 30-33 years of age class receiving the 250 IU dose, a surplus of 4.2 oocytes (14.8 versus 10.6) was found, whereas in the 37-39 age class nearly one oocyte more was retrieved in the 150 IU group (8.1 versus 7.4). The total dose used to reach the criterion for human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration was 1727 IU for the women treated with 150 IU daily and 2701 IU for the 250 IU treated women (P < 0. 001). No significant relationships were found between serum FSH concentrations as obtained in the early follicular phase and the number of oocytes collected, or the total dose. It is concluded that in women between 30 and 39 years of age, the decline in number of oocytes retrieved with increasing age cannot be overcome by augmenting the daily dose of recombinant FSH from 150 to 250 IU.

Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of recombinant FSH (follitropin beta, Puregon; NV Organon, Oss, the Netherlands) and urinary FSH (urofollitropin, Metrodin; Ares-Serono, Geneva, Switzerland)., Design: A prospective, multicenter, assessor-blind, randomized, clinical trial., Setting: Twelve European infertility clinics., Patient(s): One hundred seventy-two women (recombinant FSH: n = 105; urinary FSH: n = 67) with clomiphene citrate-resistant normogonadotropic chronic anovulation (World Health Organization group II)., Intervention(s): Eligible subjects were randomized (ratio of recombinant to urinary FSH, 3:2) and treated for a maximum of three cycles. A low-dose step-up regimen was used, with 75 IU of FSH given IM daily for a maximum of 14 days and, if needed, weekly increments of half an ampule given thereafter until the threshold dose for follicular development was achieved., Main Outcome Measure(s): Cumulative ovulation rate after three cycles, total FSH dose, and treatment period needed to achieve ovulation., Result(s): The cumulative ovulation rates after three treatment cycles were 95% and 96% for the recombinant and urinary FSH groups, respectively. Overall, ovulation was seen in 155 of 223 treatment cycles (69.5%) in the recombinant FSH group, compared with 92 of 138 treatment cycles (66.7%) in the urinary FSH group. In the first cycle, a statistically significantly lower total dose (750 versus 1,035 IU) and a shorter treatment period (10 versus 13 days) were needed in the recombinant FSH group to reach ovulation. Only one case of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome led to hospitalization. Two sets of twins (one in each treatment group) and one set of triplets (in the recombinant FSH group) were born., Conclusion(s): Recombinant FSH (Puregon) is more efficient than urinary FSH (Metrodin) in inducing follicular development.

Recently, several new urinary gonadotrophin preparations have been developed, containing less luteinizing hormone (LH) activity than human menopausal gonadotrophin. Normegon is a gonadotrophin preparation with a follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)/LH ratio of 3:1; Follegon and Metrodin-HP are purified FSH preparations. The aim of the present randomized study was to compare pharmaco-dynamics, -kinetics and local tolerance of these preparations after repeated s.c. administration. Thirty-six healthy female subjects were treated with Lyndiol contraceptive pills for 5 weeks to suppress endogenous gonadotrophin concentrations. After 3 weeks of Lyndiol treatment, 150 IU of Normegon, Follegon or Metrodin HP were administered once daily, s.c. for 7 days. Blood samples were collected once daily during the fourth and fifth weeks of the study and assayed for FSH and oestradiol. After the last gonadotrophin injection, blood samples were collected more frequently to determine pharmacokinetic parameters of FSH. During the fourth and fifth study weeks, daily ultrasound measurements of follicular growth were performed. Endogenous FSH and LH values were extremely suppressed during Lyndiol treatment. Serum FSH values showed similar patterns in the three groups. The maximum FSH concentration was reached 9-11 h post-injection, the terminal half-life was 43-47 h. The preparations were bioequivalent with respect to FSH immunoreactivity. The number of follicles tended to be larger after Normegon than after Follegon and Metrodin HP treatment, though this was not statistically significant. Serum oestradiol concentrations were significantly higher after Normegon treatment. In general, s.c injections were well tolerated. In conclusion, the three preparations were bioequivalent with respect to FSH immunoreactivity. Nevertheless, the biological activity of Normegon tended to be higher than that of Follegon and Metrodin HP in Lyndiol-suppressed women.

An attempt was made to integrate data from cryopreserved embryos with those from fresh embryos to obtain a realistic assessment of the role of cryopreservation in assisted reproductive treatment. Principles were applied to previously published data from a large prospective randomized multicentre study comprising recombinant and urinary follicle stimulating hormone in in-vitro fertilization.

Objective: To assess ongoing pregnancy rates (PRs) in IVF after treatment with recombinant FSH (follitropin beta, Puregon; NV Organon, Oss, The Netherlands) as compared with urinary gonadotropins., Design: A combined analysis of three prospective, multicenter, randomized, comparative trials., Setting: Twenty-five IVF centers in 13 countries., Patient(s): Six hundred ninety-seven infertile women receiving recombinant FSH and 463 women receiving hMG or urinary FSH and undergoing one cycle of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IVF-ET., Intervention(s): A center-based and study-based analysis weighing the treatment differences in individual centers and studies, respectively., Main Outcome Measures(s): Pregnancy rate at least 12 weeks after ET per started cycle., Results(s): In the center-based analysis, the ongoing PR was 22.9% for recombinant FSH and 17.9% for urinary gonadotropins. The 5.0% treatment difference (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2% to 9.7%) was significant. When the results of the cryoprogram were included, the treatment difference increased to 6.4% (95% CI, 1.4% to 11.3%). Also in the study-based analysis, significantly higher PRs were seen after follitropin beta treatment., Conclusion(s): Follitropin beta (Puregon) used for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF yields significantly higher PRs compared with urinary gonadotropins.

Objective: To compare local tolerance and clinical efficacy after i.m. or s.c. injection of recombinant FSH (Puregon; NV Organon, Oss, The Netherlands)., Design: An open-label, prospective, randomized, group-comparative, multicenter study., Setting: Twelve IVF clinics in 10 countries., Patient(s): Two hundred eighteen infertile pituitary-suppressed women undergoing IVF-ET were randomized, of whom 195 (i.m., n = 77; s.c., n = 118) received recombinant FSH., Intervention(s): One cycle of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation induced by either i.m. or s.c. injection of recombinant FSH, followed by IVF-ET., Main Outcome Measure(s): Local tolerance symptoms, number of oocytes retrieved, ongoing pregnancy rate., Result(s): The incidences after i.m. injection of bruising, pain, redness, swelling, and itching were 37.7%, 31.2%, 13.0%, 7.8%, and 6.5%; after s.c. injection, the corresponding figures were 54.2%, 28.0%, 16.1%, 5.9%, and 3.4%. Only bruising was significantly lower in the i.m. group, which could be attributed to the more visible superficial injection site with s.c. administration. The overall occurrence of local symptoms were 63.6% after i.m. injection and 68.6% after s.c. injection. The mean numbers of oocytes recovered were 9.8 (i.m) and 10.4 (s.c.) and the ongoing pregnancy rates per attempt were 27.1% (i.m.) and 26.1% (s.c.), respectively., Conclusion(s): There were no marked differences in local tolerance symptoms and clinical efficacy between i.m. and s.c. administration of recombinant FSH.

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate bioequivalence between two follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)-only gonadotrophin preparations (Follegon(R) and Metrodin(R)) after a single i.m. injection of IU FSH in-vivo bioactivity. A total of 16 healthy normally cycling females were treated for 7 weeks with a high-dose oral contraceptive containing 50 microg ethinyl oestradiol plus 2.5 mg lynestrenol (Lyndiol(R)) to suppress endogenous gonadotrophin production. After 3 and 5 weeks or oral contraceptive treatment, each subject received 300 IU Follegon or Metrodin in a random order. Frequent blood sampling was performed to measure immunoreactive FSH for pharmacokinetic analysis. After normalization for the immunodose administered, Follegon and Metrodin were bioequivalent with respect to the extent and the rate of absorption, the elimination half-life and plasma clearance per kg. The time taken to reach peak plasma FSH concentrations was shorter with Follegon than with Metrodin. Because bioequivalence was proved for the major pharmacokinetic variables, it can be assumed that Follegon and Metrodin are also equally effective inovulation induction, in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer programmes and the treatment of male infertility.

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) preparation (Org 32489, Puregon) with a urinary FSH preparation (Metrodin) in infertile women undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF and embryo transfer and who were pituitary-suppressed with triptorelin. In an assessor-blind, group-comparative, multicentre study, 60 women were randomized to Org 32489 and 39 to urinary FSH. An evaluation of the main parameter, the mean total number of oocytes recovered, indicated a similar efficacy for the two preparations: 9.7 with Org 32489 versus 8.9 with urinary FSH. In addition, there were no significant between-group differences with respect to other efficacy variables such as the total dose used, the duration of the treatment, the number of follicles > or = 17 mm in diameter and embryo quality. The ongoing pregnancy rates per attempt (30.2 versus 17.4%) and per transfer (34.0 versus 18.8%) were higher with Org 32489, but this difference was not statistically significant. No clinically relevant differences between Org 32489 and urinary FSH were seen with respect to safety variables. Serum antibodies were not detected in any of the subjects. It is concluded that Org 32489 compares favourably with urinary FSH in the treatment of infertile pituitary-suppressed women undergoing IVF and embryo transfer.

Urinary follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) is being used for the treatment of human infertility. Recently, FSH manufactured by means of recombinant DNA technology with a much higher purity (> 99%) has become available. A prospective, randomized, assessor-blind, multicentre (n = 18) study was conducted in infertile women undergoing in-vitro fertilization comparing recombinant FSH (Org 32489, Puregon) and urinary FSH (Metrodin). Eligible subjects were randomized (recombinant versus urinary FSH = 3:2) and pretreated with buserelin for pituitary suppression. FSH was given until three or more follicles with a diameter of at least 17 mm were seen. After oocyte retrieval, fertilization routines were applied according to local procedures. No more than three embryos were replaced. In all, 585 subjects received recombinant FSH and 396 urinary FSH. Significantly more oocytes were retrieved after recombinant FSH treatment (mean adjusted for centre 10.84 versus 8.95, P < 0.0001). Ongoing pregnancy rates per attempt and transfer in the recombinant FSH group were 22.17 and 25.97% respectively, and in the urinary FSH group, 18.22 and 22.02% respectively (not significant). Ongoing pregnancy rates including pregnancies resulting from frozen-thawed embryo cycles were 25.7% for recombinant and 20.4% for urinary FSH (P = 0.05). Compared to urinary FSH, the total dose of FSH was significantly lower with recombinant FSH (2138 versus 2385 IU, P < 0.0001) in a significantly shorter treatment period (10.7 versus 11.3 days, P < 0.0001). No clinically relevant differences between recombinant and urinary FSH were seen with respect to safety variables. It is concluded that recombinant FSH (Puregon) is more effective than urinary FSH in inducing multifollicular development and achieving an ongoing pregnancy.

Objectives: A prospective, controlled multicenter study was performed to estimate the obstetric risks of antiphospholipid antibodies (the lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies). In addition, the risks of prior thrombosis, obstetric history, systemic lupus erythematosus, and high-dose prednisone treatment were evaluated., Study Design: After screening for antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with lupus erythematosus or women with prior fetal loss(es), 59 subsequent pregnancies with and 54 without these antibodies were followed., Results: The presence of the lupus anticoagulant and a history of at least three spontaneous abortions could predict fetal loss (p = 0.032 and 0.001, respectively). In live born infants, a low birth weight could be predicted by the presence of anticardiolipin antibodies (p = 0.034), prior intrauterine fetal death (p = 0.025), and treatment with high-dose prednisone (p = 0.002). No relationships were seen between antiphospholipid antibodies and small-for-gestational-age newborns and pregnancy-induced hypertension or preeclampsia. The disappearance of antiphospholipid antibodies during pregnancy was not correlated with live birth., Conclusion: It is concluded that the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies is a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcome.

Fluctuations of lupus anticoagulant activity and anticardiolipin antibody titres were studied in 53 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The median study time was 26 months with a median number of 12 samples. Lupus anticoagulant was measured by the kaolin clotting time (KCT) and dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT) assays; anticardiolipin antibodies were assayed by an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Normal and increased KCTs or dRVVTs were seen during follow up in 13 and 12 patients, respectively. IgG anticardiolipin antibodies changed from negative to positive or positive to negative in 26 patients and IgM anticardiolipin antibodies in 16 patients. Disease activity and treatment with prednisone could account for these fluctuations in the kaolin clotting time (KCT) in 7 of 13 patients and in the dRVVT in 2 of 12 patients. Whole group analysis showed that the KCT, dRVVT, and IgM anticardiolipin antibodies were not associated with disease activity, in contrast with IgG anticardiolipin antibodies. During treatment with prednisone normal KCT and dRVVT results were obtained more easily than normal anticardiolipin antibody levels. It is recommended that lupus patients should not be classified as antiphospholipid antibody positive or negative on the basis of only one sample.

Anti-phospholipid antibodies are associated with first trimester abortions and late intra-uterine fetal death. The histopathology of 47 placentae from 45 women with intra-uterine fetal death, including 16 patients with anti-phospholipid antibodies, was studied in order to detect potential differences between placentae from women with and without these antibodies. Thirteen patients had systemic lupus erythematosus or lupus-like disease, including 6 women with anti-phospholipid antibodies. In placentae from patients with anti-phospholipid antibodies, a decrease in vasculo-syncytial membranes, fibrosis mainly in infarcted areas, hypovascular villi and thrombosis or infarction was seen significantly more often than in placentae from women without these antibodies. Of 17 placentae from 16 patients with anti-phospholipid antibodies, only 3 did not demonstrate signs of thrombosis or infarction. Thrombosis/infarction was significantly associated with a decrease in vasculo-syncytial membranes, fibrosis, hypovascular villi and an increase in syncytial knots. These findings are most likely to be the result of prolonged hypoxia due to thrombosis or infarction. It is concluded that thrombosis or infarctions are prominent features in placenta from patients with anti-phospholipid antibodies and intra-uterine fetal death. Consequently, antithrombotic treatment during pregnancy forms a rational approach in these patients.

The prevalence of antiphospholipid and antinuclear antibodies in 102 patients with at least three unexplained miscarriages before a gestational age of 12 weeks, or at least one intrauterine fetal death after 12 weeks, was investigated and compared with the prevalence in 102 normal pregnant controls. Six patients had a history of thrombosis and six had 'lupus-like' disease. Twenty one patients had anticardiolipin antibodies compared with 10 controls. Serum samples of nine patients and one control contained antinuclear antibodies. The lupus anticoagulant was present in the plasma of five patients with anticardiolipin antibodies. The influence of patient selection on the results was illustrated by the finding that antiphospholipid antibodies and antinuclear antibodies were mainly detected in patients with lupus-like disease or a history of thrombosis. When these patients were excluded there was no significant difference in the prevalence of anticardiolipin and antinuclear antibodies between patients and controls. Therefore, in the absence of lupus-like disease or a history of thrombosis, screening for antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with adverse pregnancy outcomes seems not to be indicated.

Anti-phospholipid antibodies such as the lupus anticoagulant and anti-cardiolipin antibodies, are antibodies directed at negatively charged phospholipids and have received much attention in the last decade. Their presence has been associated with a thrombotic tendency, leading to a variety of clinical symptoms. In the pregnant woman, the presence of these antibodies may have consequences for management, since retrospective reports have established a correlation between the lupus anticoagulant or anti-cardiolipin antibodies with intrauterine fetal death, probably due to placental thrombosis. This article reviews current knowledge on anti-phospholipid antibodies in relation to pregnancy loss, focusing on clinical aspects.

In 53 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus sequential blood samples obtained during a four year period (range 6-47 months) were screened for anticardiolipin antibodies (ACAs). Disease activity and treatment with prednisone were also assessed and related to ACA concentrations. During follow up only 21 patients for ACA IgG (40%) and 25 for ACA IgM (47%) remained in the ACA category (negative, low positive, high positive) found at the first sample taken at entrance. Marked increases from negative to high positive concentrations were sometimes seen and were not accompanied by typical events such as thrombosis or thrombocytopenia (the ACA syndrome). Shifts in ACA concentrations could not always be explained by changes in prednisone dose. Also, in patients with low dose prednisone treatment or none at all (n = 22) 10 patients (45%) changed ACA IgG category and 12 patients (55%) fluctuated in ACA IgM categories during follow up. As a consequence of the variability in ACA titres relations of ACAs with the ACA syndrome depended on the blood sample studied. In the second sample, randomly taken half way through follow up, no significant relations with the ACA syndrome could be found. Anticardiolipin antibody IgG was significantly associated with disease activity in 11/47 patients (23%) and in the group as a whole. During remission ACA IgG was significantly associated with the ACA syndrome, whereas during moderate/severe disease activity in the same patients that correlation was not significant. Anticardiolipin antibody IgM was much less influenced by disease activity, and in only 4/47 patients (9%) could a significant relation with disease activity be shown. Associations of ACA IgM with the ACA syndrome were significant during both lupus flares and remission.