Search

Christopher Banse,1,2 Mourad Ould-Slimane,3 Emmanuel Foulongne,3 Alexis Perez,4 Gilles Avenel,1 Alain Daragon,1 Olivier Vittecoq11Rheumatology Department, Rouen University Hospital, 76000 Rouen, France; 2Rheumatology Department, Polyclinique Saint Côme, 60200 Compiègne, France; 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, 76000 Rouen, France; 4Department of Neurosurgery, Rouen University Hospital, 76000 Rouen, FranceBackground and objective: There is absence of data on the prevalence of osteoporosis before corrective surgery of the lumbar spine. We do not know the impact of bone assessment before corrective spine surgery, regarding the prevalence of osteoporosis, risk factors for osteoporosis, and prescription of osteoporotic treatment. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of assessment of bone status before corrective surgery of the lumbar spine.Methods: This retrospective study was conducted over a period of 30 months. Patients included were over 50 years old and had been referred to rheumatology consultation prior to corrective surgery of the lumbar spine with osteosynthesis, for scoliosis or spondylolisthesis. Assessment of bone status consisted in looking for risk factors for osteoporotic fracture, performing bone densitometry with the calculation of TBS (trabecular bone score) and the possible introduction of treatment for osteoporosis. Data were collected on complications related to bone fragility during follow-up.Results: Twenty-eight patients with a median age of 71.2 years (55.5–84.8) were included; 89% were women. T score was

Introduction: Intraspinal extradural arthrosynovial cysts, which belong to the spectrum of degenerative spinal diseases are mainly located at lumbar level and their location at cervical level joint is therefore unusual. The most common surgical approach for symptomatic arthrosynovial cervical cyst remains a direct resection of the cyst by a cervical hemilaminectomy with or without a posterior arthrodesis. However, another surgical approach may also be discussed when considering the cyst as a result of a local spinal instability or hypermobility., Case Report: We report in this work the case of a patient with cervical radiculopathy due to intraspinal extradural compressive arthrosynovial cervical cyst which was treated by anterior discectomy and fusion without direct resection of the cyst. The post-operative radiological control performed at 3 months showed a complete regression of the cyst with a patient pain-free. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of intraspinal cervical degenerative cyst at C7-T1 level treated by anterior approach and fusion without direct cyst resection., Conclusion: For the treatment of a joint spinal cervical cyst, the anterior approach is a relevant option that gives the advantages to respect the posterior cervical muscles and articular structures., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest: Nil, (Copyright: © Indian Orthopaedic Research Group.)

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efffectiveness of a titanium vertebral augmentation device (SpineJack system) in terms of back pain, radiological outcomes, and economic burden compared with nonsurgical management (NSM) (bracing) for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. Complications were also evaluated for both treatment methods., Methods: A prospective multicenter randomized study was performed at 9 French sites. Patients (n = 100) with acute traumatic Magerl type A1 and A3.1 vertebral fractures were enrolled and randomized to treatment with the SpineJack system or NSM consisting of bracing and administration of pain medication. Participants were monitored at admission, during the procedure, and at 1, 12, and 24 months after treatment initiation. Primary outcomes included visual analog scale back pain score, and secondary outcomes included disability (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] score), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D score), radiological measures (vertebral kyphosis angle [VKA] and regional traumatic angulation [RTA]), and economic outcomes (costs, procedures, hours of help, and time to return to work)., Results: Ninety-five patients were included in the analysis, with 48 in the SpineJack group and 47 in the NSM group. Back pain improved significantly for all participants with no significant differences between groups. ODI and EQ-5D scores improved significantly between baseline and follow-up (1, 12, and 24 months) for all participants, with the SpineJack group showing a larger improvement than the NSM group between baseline and 1 month. VKA was significantly lower (p < 0.001) (i.e., better) in the SpineJack group than in the NSM group at 1, 12, and 24 months of follow-up. There was no significant change over time in RTA for the SpineJack group, but the NSM group showed a significant worsening in RTA over time. SpineJack treatment was associated with higher costs than NSM but involved a shorter hospital stay, fewer medical visits, and fewer hours of nursing care. Time to return to work was significantly shorter for the SpineJack group than for the NSM group. There were no significant differences in complications between the two treatments., Conclusions: Overall, there was no statistical difference in the primary outcomes between the SpineJack treatment group and the NSM group. In terms of secondary outcomes, SpineJack treatment was associated with better radiological outcomes, shorter hospital stays, faster return to work, and fewer hours of nursing care.

BACKGROUND Infection is a serious surgical complication that significantly increases morbidity rates and health care expenses. Most human Pasteurella multocida infections are soft-tissue infections caused by dog or cat bites. Pasteurella multocida (P. multocida) is present in the oral, nasopharyngeal, and upper respiratory tract microbiota among cats, dogs, and other domestic or wild animals. Here, we report a case of lumbar surgical site infection caused by this bacterium. CASE REPORT A 70-year-old diabetic and overweight woman had a Pasteurella multocida surgical site infection after lumbar arthrodesis carried out for lumbar stenosis associated with spondylolisthesis. The patient had been in contact with her cat and claimed to have simply slept with it in her bed. Multiple antibiotic therapies and 3 debridement-irrigations with change of spinal implants during the last revision were needed. CONCLUSIONS Infections caused by P. multocida are rare and most often occur as a result of animal scratches or bites, but can sometimes occur after simple contact with an animal. Surgical site infection of spinal arthrodesis due to Pasteurella multocida implies treatment difficulties. In case of Pasteurella multocida infection of lumbar spinal arthrodesis, even in the early period, implant removal seems to be useful to limit the appearance of biofilm more specific to this micro-organism.

Introduction: Circumferential fusion by the anterior (ALIF) or transforaminal (TLIF) approach combined with posterior instrumentation is currently used for the surgical treatment of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. But few studies have compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of various interbody fusion techniques. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological results at 2 years postoperative of two fusion techniques-TLIF versus ALIF plus posterior instrumentation-for low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults., Materials and Methods: This was an observational multicenter study done at nine French healthcare facilities specialized in spine surgery. The inclusion criteria were minimum age of 18 years, grade 1-3 isthmic spondylolisthesis, ALIF+posterior fixation (ALIF+PS) or TLIF, minimum follow-up of 2 years. Clinical and radiological evaluations were done preoperatively and at 2 years of follow-up. A lumbar CT scan was done at 1 year postoperative to evaluate fusion., Results: The cohort consisted of 89 patients (50 women, 39 men) with a mean age of 47.7±12.3 (18-79) years. The patients in the ALIF groups (n=71) had a significantly longer hospital stay than those in the TLIF group (n=18): 5.7 days versus 4.6 days (p=.04). However, their medical leave from work was significantly shorter: 31.0 weeks versus 40.7 (p=.003). Lumbar pain VAS diminished faster in the ALIF groups, with a significantly larger drop than the TLIF group in the first 3 months postoperative. Only the increase in lumbar disc lordosis was larger in the ALIF group: 11.7°±12.0° versus 6.0°±11.7° (p=.036). There was a significant correlation between the increase in global lordosis and reduction in lumbar VAS at 2 years postoperative (ρ=-0.3295; p=.021)., Conclusion: ALIF+PS provides a faster relief of postoperative low back pain than TLIF but there are no significant clinical differences between techniques at 2 years of follow-up. Despite better restoration of disc lordosis in the ALIF+PS group, there was no difference in the restoration of global lordosis., Level of Evidence: III; multicenter comparative study., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Cage impactions (CI) of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) appear to be a frequent mechanical complication with a potential functional impact., Objectives: To determine the rate of CI occurrence, their risk factors and clinical implications in the case of combined single-level arthrodesis., Method: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed. All our patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis initially underwent OLIF combined with pedicle screw fixation (PSF). Intraoperative control with an image intensifier and a standard radiograph in the immediate postoperative period made it possible to assess the occurrence of CI, depending on the position of the implant. Secondary subsidence was sought on the standing radiological examination using EOS biplanar radiography during follow-up. The pelvic parameters were analyzed, as well as the occurrence of bone fusion. The clinical evaluation was made at≥1 year, by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the walking distance (WD) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)., Results: In all, 130 patients out of the 131 included were analyzed. A CI occurred in 25.3% (n=33) of cases and of these, 94% (n=32) occurred intraoperatively. Postmenopausal women had more CI with an odds ratio (OR) of 5.8 (P=0.034). The "CI" group had a 9.5% lower ODI score than the "non-CI" group (P=0.0040), but both provided excellent ODI gains of 30.8±16 and 32.9±15.5% (P<0.0001). An "anterior" position of the implant allowed a greater gain in lumbar lordosis (P<0.001) but was associated with greater CI occurrence (P<0.001), with an OR of 6.75 (P=0.0018)., Conclusion: The occurrence of intraoperative cage impaction is a frequent event when performing OLIF. Postmenopausal women have an approximately 6 times greater risk of impaction than men, and patients with an "anterior" implant placement have a 7 times greater risk than with central placement. The negative impact of cage impactions on the clinical score (ODI) was significant after one year of follow-up., Level of Evidence: IV, non-comparative cohort study., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Introduction: Low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis (ISPL) is generally treated by circumferential fusion with interbody graft, although there is no consensus on technique., Hypothesis: The various interbody fusion strategies provide satisfactory fusion rates and clinical results., Methods: A multicenter retrospective study analyzed lumbar interbody fusion for low-grade ISPL performed between March 2016 and March 2019. Techniques comprised: circumferential fusion on a posterior or a transforaminal approach (PLIF, TLIF: n=57), combined anterior (ALIF)+posterolateral fusion (ALIF+PLF: n=60), and ALIF+percutaneous posterior fixation (ALIF+PPF: n=55). Function was assessed on a lumbar and a radicular visual analog scale (AVS-L, VAS-R), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Short Form 12 (SF12)., Results: Among the 129 patients, 85.3% showed fusion (Lenke 1 or 2), with no significant differences between the ALIF-PLF or ALIF-PPF groups and the PLIF or TLIF groups (p=0.3). Likewise, there was no difference in fusion rates between the ALIF-PPF and ALIF-PLF subgroups (p=0.28). VAS-L (p<0.001) and VAS-R (p<0.0001), ODI (p<0.001) and SF12 physical (PCS) (p<0.01) and mental component sores (MCS) (p<0.001) all showed significant improvement at 12months. Combined approaches provided greater clinical efficacy than TLIF or PLIF for lumbar (p<0.0001) and radicular pain (p<0.05), ODI (p<0.0001) and SF12 PCS (p<0.01). At 12months, there was no clinical difference between the ALIF-PPF and ALIF-PLF subgroups. However, patents with interbody non-union (Lenke 3 or 4) had lower SF12 PCS scores (p<0.004) and VAS-L ratings (p<0.001) than Lenke 1-2 patients., Conclusion: Low-grade ISPL treated by circumferential arthrodesis and interbody graft showed 85.3% consolidation at 2years, with equivalent outcomes between anterior and posterior techniques. Successful fusion was associated with better clinical results., Level of Evidence: IV., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Purpose: To assess the risk of developing thoracogenic scoliosis (THS) in paediatric patients, depending on the side of lateral thoracotomy (LT) and of spine deviation in the coronal plane by means of logistic regression and scoliosis-free survival analyses., Methods: A total of 307 consecutive patients undergoing LT were retrospectively reviewed; 32 patients met the inclusion criteria: 1) underwent LT and developed THS; 2) age < 15 years at LT; 3) clinical and radiographic follow-up ≥ 5 years. Patients were divided into ipsilateral group (convexity ipsilateral to LT) and contralateral group (convexity contralateral to LT)., Results: The mean follow-up was 10 ± 4.7 in the ipsilateral group (n = 13) and 12 ± 4.8 years in the contralateral group (n = 19). The contralateral group underwent LT at a younger age (4.4 vs 6.4 years, p = 0.55), developed more severe coronal deformity (27.8° vs 18.9°, p = 0.15), had higher rate of THS > 20° (47.5% vs 38.4%; p = 0.34) and > 45° (21.1% vs 0%; p = 0.99). The mean time from LT to THS diagnosis was 4.2 ± 2.9 in ipsilateral group and 5.5 ± 4.2 years in contralateral group. Left-side LT (p = 0.03) and age > 5 years (p = 0.01) showed a lower risk of THS diagnosis. The group variable had a statistically significant effect on the risk of developing THS > 45° (p = 0.03)., Conclusion: In this series, children that developed THS with a convexity contralateral to the side of LT had more severe and progressive coronal spine deformity., Level of Evidence: III., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background Data: Anterior sagittal imbalance (ASI) is a severity factor in spinal pathology. Stabilometric study of the dynamic position of the center of pressure (CoP) assesses orthostatic control. These analyses provide the energy expenditure used for this control., Hypothesis: Stabilometric signs are associated with ASI indicate increased energy expenditure., Patients and Methods: Healthy male volunteers were subjected to reversible ASI induced by wearing a kyphotic thermoformed thoracolumbar corset. The deformation was assessed by C7 tilt on EOS whole-spine views. Static and dynamic posturographic force platform study was performed under conditions of anteroposterior and mediolateral instability. Mean CoP position (X mean , Y mean ) was studied on statokinesigram, with scatter assessed as confidence ellipse (CE). Path length according to CE surface (LAS) indicated energy expenditure. The stabilogram quantified displacement over time as lengths (L x , L y ) and amplitudes (A x , A y )., Results: The corset significantly increased C7 tilt (p<0.0001). This did not significantly change mean CoP positions (X mean and Y mean ), but LAS was significantly increased (p=0.003). Static tests showed changes in L y (p=0.0008) and A x (p=0.003), and dynamic tests showed changes in L y (p<0.0001), L x (p<0.0001), A x (p<0.0001), A y (p<0.05) and CE (p<0.004)., Discussion: Posturographic parameters were impacted by inducing ASI in healthy subjects. Significant differences were seen in stabilography, CE and LAS, were greater on dynamic testing, and correlated with radiologic sagittal balance. Force platforms can reveal increased energy expenditure in maintaining posture., Level of Evidence: II; Single-center prospective study involving healthy volunteers., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Surgery for pediatric spinal deformity may involve vertebral osteotomies in complex cases. Vertebral column resection (VCR) is the most technically demanding procedure, with the severest morbidity. It can use a double anterior and posterior approach (APVCR), though a single posterior approach (PVCR) is gaining in popularity., Hypothesis: PVCR provides effective correction with acceptable morbidity in children., Method: A single-center retrospective series included spinal deformities treated by PVCR. Surgical data and global pelvic-spinal balance parameters were analyzed., Results: Sixteen PVCRs were performed in 13 patients, with a mean age of 14.1±2.8 years. Mean operative time was 411±54minutes. Mean preoperative rigid principal Cobb angle was 74.3°. Mean correction was 64.3% postoperatively, without significant correction loss at last follow-up. Mean blood loss was 941±221ml. The cell-saver enabled 92.3% autologous transfusions, with 53.4% homologous transfusions. Transient monoplegia and permanent psoas deficit were observed during the postoperative period. Radiologic follow-up found 4 non-unions requiring revision., Conclusion: PVCR provided major correction of rigid spinal deformity in children. Complications mainly comprised mechanical or neurological incidents., Level of Evidence: IV, non-comparative cohort study., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)