Search

Body weight loss and poor nutritional status are frequently observed after esophageal cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to pilot an investigation on the impact of home enteral tube feeding supplementation (HES) for up to 3 months after esophageal cancer surgery. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive 67 esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. We started HES from April 2017. The patients were divided into 2 groups. Among 67 patients, 40 patients underwent HES between April 2017 and November 2020 (HES group). Other 27 patients who underwent esophagectomy between January 2012 and March 2017 were not administered HES (C group). Thereafter, multiple factors concerning patient nutritional status at long-term follow-up were evaluated. The baseline characteristics were balanced between the two groups. There were no significant differences in nutritional status scores before esophagectomy. The percentage weight loss was less in the HES group compared with the C group both at 3 months and 1 year after surgery: 7.3% (−7.6 to 15.2), 7.7% (−4 to 13.9) in the HES group and 10.6% (−3.6 to 29.1), 10.8% (−5.8 to 20.0) in C group (P  < 0.05, P  < 0.05). In the patients with anastomotic stenosis, the percentage weight loss was less in the HES group compared with the C group: 7.2% (2.0–14.9) and 14.6% (6.2–29.1), P  < 0.05. HES may improve early weight loss in postesophagectomy patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The patient was a 60s male. He underwent esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction for Barrett's esophageal cancer( pT3N1M0, pStage Ⅲ). Postoperatively, anastomotic leakage and mediastinitis resulted in septic shock. On the 8th day after first surgery, he transferred to our hospital. At the time of admission, qSOFA was 3 points. We judged to be difficult to treat with conservative treatment. Emergency right thoracotomy drainage underwent with resection of the esophagogastric anastomosis and cervical esophagostomy construction. He was discharged on the 55th postoperative day with home enteral nutrition. He underwent presternal ileocolic reconstruction on the 97th day after right thoracotomy drainage. On the 19th day after reconstruction, oral intake was started. The general condition is good without recurrence, and oral intake is sufficient at 1 year after reconstruction. We report a case of anastomotic leakage with septic shock after esophageal cancer surgery successfully treated by 2 stage ileocolic reconstruction.

Many cases with esophageal cancer recurrence have worse clinical survival. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)has been reported to result in significantly longer overall survival. We investigated the clinical outcomes in 30 patients with esophageal cancer recurrence who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery, chemotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy. Results: Of the 30 patients investigated, 25 were men. Median patient age was 70(range 52-84)years. The recurrence sites are as follows: 17 in locoregional, 5 in lung, 2 in bone, 3 in liver, and 5 in others. The overall survival in early recurrence(within 6 months after surgery)cases and multiple recurrence cases were significantly shorter than that in later recurrence(>6 months after surgery)and single recurrence(p=0.031, p<0.01). Of 30 recurrence cases, 9 cases (30%)achieved complete response(CR). Five of CR cases were treated by chemotherapy with ICI. In esophageal cancer recurrence, treatment with ICI showed good response and survival benefit. In future, the indication of ICI is evaluated for adjuvant therapy after surgery.

Palliative stoma creation for malignant gastrointestinal obstruction improves quality of life, and advances in chemotherapy have resulted in long-term survival after stoma creation. We reviewed early and late complications in 24 patients treated with palliative stoma creation. Results: 14 men(58%)and 10 women(42%)had a median age of 60 years. Twenty-three patients(96%)were able to eat more than a porridge diet postoperatively, and the median The ColoRectal Obstruction Scoring System(CROSS)improved from 1(0-3)to 4(2-4)(p<0.001). Postoperative complications(all Clavien-Dindo grades)were observed in 10 patients(42%), with a longer postoperative hospital stay in the complication group than in the group without complication(median 34 days: 17 days, p=0.026). When divided into long-term survivors and short- term survivors based on a median overall survival of 101 days, more stoma prolapse occurred in the long-term survivors(4 cases 33% vs 0 cases 0%, p=0.028), one of which required repair surgery. Conclusion: Long-term survivors after exploratory stoma creation are more likely to develop a stoma prolapse. Careful surgical manipulation and postoperative support system including stoma care are important.

Perforated gastric cancer is relatively rare disease. Between 2006 and 2016, we treated 8 cases with perforative gastric cancer. These cases accounted for 15%of the 53 cases with the upper gastrointestinal tract perforated cases. The median age of perforated gastric cancer case was 66(37-80)years, which was significantly higher than that of perforated benign upper gastrointestinal ulcer(55, 12-97 years)(p=0.033). These patients were divided into 2 groups; 3 cases who died up to 3 months as poor prognosis group and 5 cases who survived more than 4 months as good prognosis group. Poor prognosis group tended to be higher Glasgow prognostic score(GPS)(p=0.05)and lower serum albumin level(p=0.05)than good prognosis group. GPS and serum albumin level may predict the prognosis of perforated gastric cancer patients.