Search

Introduction: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a computer vision system in guiding exercise management for patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) by comparing functional improvement between a tele-rehabilitation versus an outpatient intervention program., Methods and Analysis: This is a prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled trial of 60 patients with knee OA who will be randomly assigned to exercise therapy (n=30) or control (n=30) . Both groups will receive treatment two times per week for 12 weeks. The primary outcome of the study will be assessed using the University of Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score will be assessed, as well as the visual analogue scale, quality of life score and physical fitness score. All observations will be collected at baseline and at weeks 4, 8 and 12 during the intervention period, as well as at weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24 during the follow-up visits after the end of the intervention., Ethics and Dissemination: This evaluator-blinded, prospective, randomised controlled study was approved by the Biomedical Ethics Review Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University., Trial Registration Number: ChiCTR2300070319., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Di Liu is the employee of Jiakang Zhongzhi Technology Company. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

The trial aimed to examine the effect of eight weeks preoperative low-load blood flow restricted resistance training (BFR-RT) on physical function, lower limb strength, and patient-reported outcomes in knee OA patients 3 and 12 months after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared with preoperative usual care. An assessor blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted. Eighty-six patients scheduled for TKA who were allocated to 8 weeks BFR-RT on the affected leg 3x/week or preoperative usual care involving no exercise (CON)., Primary Outcome: 30-s sit to stand (30STS)., Secondary Outcomes: Timed Up&Go, 40-m walk test (40mWT), knee range of motion (ROM) 1-repetition maximum (1RM) leg press and knee extensor strength, maximal isometric contraction (MVIC) for the knee extensors and flexors, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Euroqol 5-dimensions (EQ-5D-L5) questionnaire. Data were collected at baseline (12 weeks pre-surgery), ~3 days pre-surgery, 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed no significant between-group differences in the change from baseline to 3 and 12 months postoperatively on 30STS, TUG, or 40mFWT. Significant between-group differences were observed at 3 but not 12 months postoperatively for the corresponding changes in 1RM leg press strength, 1RM knee extensor strength, and MVIC knee extensor favoring BFR-RT. No between-group differences were observed for the delta changes from baseline in knee ROM, KOOS subscales or EQ-5D-L5 at any postoperative time points. These findings suggest that preoperative BFR-RT offered no superior effects compared with usual preoperative care on postoperative physical function or patient-reported outcomes. Preoperative BFR-RT produced amplified gains in lower limb muscle strength at 3 months postoperatively., Trial Registration: NCT04081493., (© 2024 The Author(s). Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science In Sports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Postoperative rehabilitation after knee arthroplasty plays a decisive role in restoring the function and mobility of the affected joint. However, there is still disagreement regarding the setting, structure and content of rehabilitation after knee arthroplasty, and the evidence on the individual measures is largely unclear. The aim of this article is to provide an evidence-based overview of the current status of rehabilitation after knee arthroplasty and to critically discuss the points that are still unclear. In view of the increasing prevalence of knee osteoarthritis and the rising number of knee endoprosthesis implantations, the optimization and scientific processing of postoperative rehabilitation is more important than ever in order to be able to offer scientifically sound, practice-oriented and cost-effective rehabilitation measures in the future., Material and Methods: This review is based on a systematic literature search in Medline, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases on the topic of postoperative rehabilitation after knee arthroplasty., Results: Regarding specific treatment components, duration and frequency after knee arthroplasty, the evidence is unclear. Passive therapies should only be used supportive to active interventions. Educational programmes before and after knee arthroplasty can play a crucial role in outcome and patient satisfaction. Regular strength training should always be combined with centrally oriented components, such as motor imagery, to achieve better movement visualization and central anchoring. There is still a frequent lack of scientific evidence regarding individual therapeutic measures, their intensity, frequency, duration, exercise selection and their specific implementation in rehabilitation after knee arthroplasty. In the future, digital diagnostic and training tools will become established in both inpatient and outpatient therapy, supporting the urgently needed data collection for the scientific analysis of individual therapeutic measures., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Purpose: We investigate and compare responsiveness of the physical function subscales of patient-reported measures of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and performance-based measures of the timed up-and-go test and 6-min walk test and determine the minimal clinically important change (MCIC) values in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients following physiotherapy intervention., Methods: One hundred patients were asked to complete the WOMAC and OKS and to perform the timed up-and-go test and 6-min walk test once pre-intervention and again after 4-week physiotherapy intervention (post-intervention). Responsiveness was determined by correlation analysis and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve., Results: The WOMAC-physical function subscale (WOMAC-PF), OKS-functional component score (OKS-FCS), timed up-and-go test, and 6-min walk test showed moderate-to-good relationships with the patients' global rating scale (Spearman correlation ranges = 0.51-0.56). All outcome measures of physical function showed the area under the curve (AUC) >0.70 (AUC ranges = 0.78-0.82). The MCIC values were 12.5 points for WOMAC-PF, 17.5 points for OKS-FCS, 2.82 s for timed up-and-go test, 61 m for 6-min walk test., Conclusions: All outcome measures have adequate responsiveness to detect clinical improvements over time in functional status following the physiotherapy intervention in patients with knee OA. The MCIC values can help clinicians and researchers to make a decision based on the clinical significance of improvements in patients' functional status.

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common and serious joint disease and patients mainly suffer from knee pain and dysfunction, significantly impacting their quality of life and daily activities. Non-pharmacological treatments and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are the two major treatments for knee OA. TKA is the primary treatment for severe knee OA patients, however, the postoperative rehabilitation results are not entirely satisfactory. To enhance postoperative rehabilitation outcomes, preoperative lower-limb muscle strengthening has aroused attention and demonstrated significant results on functional recovery after TKA. Specifically, isokinetic muscle strengthening (IMS) has been highly anticipated as an efficient training method. Nevertheless, its effects in perioperative and long-term periods of TKA require further investigation. This study aims to evaluate the impact of preoperative lower-limb IMS during the 4 weeks before TKA on the perioperative and postoperative outcomes, with particular attention on knee function, pain, and inflammatory response., Methods: In this study, 104 patients awaiting TKA will be randomized to 2 groups: the IMS and health education groups. All patients will be evaluated at baseline, post-intervention, discharge day, and postoperative day 14, with follow-up assessments at 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months after discharge. The primary outcome will be the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 3 months after TKA and the medial-to-lateral knee contact force ratio. The secondary outcomes will be changes in lower-limb muscle strength, knee pain, inflammation response, active range of motion, performance-based function (5-times Sit-to-Stand Test, Time Up-and-Go Test, 3 m walking speed), Berg Balance Scale, and surgical need., Discussion: Lower-limb IMS can improve muscle strength, pain, and function for early knee OA patients. However, the effects of different doses of IMS on perioperative and postoperative knee pain, inflammation response, and function after TKA are inconclusive. This study will provide high-quality evidence to assess the efficacy of IMS in end-stage patients who will undergo TKA. Understanding IMS in end-stage knee OA patients will help guide future surgical management for this population. Trial Registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2400088136., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) was characterized by pain and limited joint function, which seriously affected the quality of life of patients. The vast majority of KOA was closely related to degeneration of the patellofemoral joint and abnormal patellar movement trajectory. Tissue-bone homeostasis manipulation (TBHM) could correct abnormal patellar movement trajectory on the basis of loosening soft tissue. However, there was little strong evidence to verify its efficacy on the patients with KOA. The study objective was to explore the efficacy of the TBHM on gait and knee function in the patients with KOA., Methods: Sixty KOA patients were randomly assigned to either the joint mobilization (n = 30) or TBHM (n = 30) group. The joint mobilization group received joint mobilization, while the TBHM group received TBHM. For two groups, the patients participated in 30 min rehabilitation sessions thrice per week for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was biomechanical gait outcomes during walking, including step length, step velocity, double support, knee range of motion (ROM), and knee adduction moment (KAM). The secondary outcomes were the Western Ontario and McMaster Index (WOMAC) and 36-Item short- form health survey (SF-36), which reflected improvements in knee function and quality of life, respectively. At baseline and 12 weeks, evaluations were conducted and compared between groups., Results: After a 12-week intervention, significant group differences were observed in KAM (p = 0.018), WOMAC-Pain (p = 0.043) and WOMAC-Stiffness (p = 0.026). A noteworthy finding was the presence of a significant interaction effect between group and time specifically observed in step velocity during gait (p = 0.046), WOMAC-Function (p = 0.013) and SF-36 (p = 0.027). Further analysis revealed a significant difference in step velocity (p = 0.034), WOMAC-Function (p = 0.025) and SF-36 (p = 0.042) during post-assessment between the two groups. Moreover, a significant time effect was observed across all outcomes of the two groups (p < 0.05)., Conclusion: The TBHM intervention has better improved the gait, knee function, and quality of life in the patients with KOA., Trial Registration: ITMCTR, ITMCTR2200005507. Registered 06/01/2022, http://itmctr.ccebtcm.org.cn/zh-CN/Home/ProjectView?pid=09cdadad-0aef-41ee-81bd-a8dceb63f7f5 ., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Importance: Structured education and exercise therapy programs have been proposed to reduce reliance on total knee replacement (TKR) surgery and improve health care sustainability. The long-term cost-effectiveness of these programs is unclear., Objectives: To estimate the lifetime cost-effectiveness of implementing a national structured education and exercise therapy program for individuals with knee osteoarthritis with the option for future TKR compared with usual care (TKR for all)., Design, Setting, and Participants: This economic evaluation used a life table model in combination with a Markov model to compare costs and health outcomes of a national education and exercise therapy program vs usual care in the Australian health care system. Subgroup, deterministic, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were completed. A hypothetical cohort of adults aged 45 to 84 years who would undergo TKR was created., Exposure: Structured education and exercise therapy intervention provided by physiotherapists. The comparator was usual care where all people undergo TKR without accessing the program in the first year., Main Outcomes and Measures: Incremental net monetary benefit (INMB), with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio threshold of 28 033 Australian dollars (A$) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, was calculated from a health care perspective. Transition probabilities, costs, and utilities were estimated from national registries and a randomized clinical trial., Results: The hypothetical cohort included 61 394 individuals (53.9% female; 93.6% aged ≥55 years). Implementation of an education and exercise therapy program resulted in a lifetime cost savings of A$498 307 942 (US $339 922 227), or A$7970 (US $5537) per individual, and resulted in fewer QALYs (0.43 per individual) compared with usual care. At a population level, education and exercise therapy was not cost-effective at the lifetime horizon (INMB, -A$4090 [-US $2841]). Subgroup analysis revealed that the intervention was cost-effective only for the first 9 years and over a lifetime only in individuals with no or mild pain at baseline (INMB, A$11 [US $8]). Results were robust to uncertainty around model inputs., Conclusions and Relevance: In this economic evaluation of structured education and exercise therapy compared with usual care, the intervention was not cost-effective over the lifetime for all patients but was for the first 9 years and for those with minimal pain. These findings point to opportunities to invest early cost savings in additional care or prevention, including targeted implementation to specific subgroups.

Background: In knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA), the mechanism for resistance exercise improving clinical outcomes and the dose-response between strength and clinical outcomes are unknown; in part due to inconsistent trial designs across studies., Purpose: To determine whether the effects of resistance exercise interventions on pain and function differ based on comparator group; and whether there is an association between improvements in lower extremity strength with improvements in pain and function in knee and hip OA., Methods: We searched 6 databases (inception to January 28 2023,) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing land-based, resistance exercise-only interventions with no intervention or any other intervention. There were four subgroups for comparator intervention: NONE (none/placebo/sham/usual care), EXE (other exercise interventions alone), NONEXE (non-exercise interventions alone), COMBO (combined exercise + non-exercise interventions). The between-group effect (ES) was calculated for immediate post-intervention pain and function (activities of daily living (ADL) and sports/recreation (SPORT)). Meta-regression analyses were completed to evaluate the association between improvements in lower extremity strength (independent variable) and improvements in pain, ADL and SPORT (dependent variables), irrespective of comparator intervention., Results: For knee OA (257 studies), there were large benefits for pain [ES (95 % CI) = -0.92 (-1.15, -0.69)], ADL [-0.79 (-1.01, -0.56)] and SPORT [-0.79 (-1.02, -0.56)] favouring resistance exercise interventions compared to NONE. For knee pain, there was also a moderate benefit favouring COMBO interventions compared to resistance exercise interventions [0.44 (0.23, 0.65)]. For hip OA (15 studies), there were moderate benefits for pain [-0.51 (-0.68, -0.33)], ADL [-0.57 (-0.78, -0.36)] and SPORT [-0.52 (-0.70, -0.35)] favouring exercise interventions compared to NONE. For hip pain, there was also a moderate benefit favouring NONEXE interventions compared to resistance exercise interventions [0.57 (0.17, 0.97)]. For knee OA, greater strength gains were associated with larger improvements in pain [β (95 % CI) = -0.24 (-0.38, -0.09)], ADL [-0.43 (-0.73, -0.12)] and SPORT [-0.37 (-0.73, -0.00)]., Conclusion: In knee and hip OA, the effects of resistance exercise on pain and function improvements depend on the comparator intervention. For knee OA, a dose-response relationship was observed between lower extremity strength gains with pain and function improvements., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To assess the construct validity and responsiveness of 3 performance-based tests in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA)., Design: This study has a prospective cohort design., Setting: Assessments were administered at the Federal University of São Carlos (Brazil) by 3 different raters., Participants: A total of 107 participants with KOA were aged ≥40 years (N=107)., Interventions: Not applicable., Main Outcome Measure: This study assessed the construct validity and responsiveness of 3 performance-based tests: 40-meter fast-paced walk test (40-m FPWT), 11-step stair climb test (11-step SCT), and 30-second chair stand test (30-s CST). The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), sedentary behavior (activPAL), and numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) were used as comparator instruments. Measurements were obtained at baseline and after 6 months. The construct validity and responsiveness were calculated using Spearman correlation coefficient within predefined hypotheses based on a panel comprising 5 experts in the field of outcome measurement in KOA., Results: The three performance-based tests showed excellent (ICC>0.9) reliability (intra and inter); however, only the 40-m FPWT and 11-step SCT were considered valid and responsive because both confirmed >75% of the priori hypotheses. The 30-s CST was not considered valid or responsive because it has not confirmed ≥75% of the priori hypotheses., Conclusion: The 3 performance-based tests are reliable for intra and inter assessments. The 40-m FPWT and 11-step SCT are both valid and responsive for measuring physical function in patients with KOA. The 30-s CST was not considered valid or responsive. Therefore, 40-m FPWT and 11-step SCT can detect changes over time and are indicated for functional assessment in clinical practice., (Copyright © 2024 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate changes in analgesic use before and after participation in a digital first-line treatment program (exercise, patient education) in persons with knee or hip osteoarthritis (OA) and to explore associations between these changes in medication use and participant-reported pain and function., Design: Retrospective cohort study with pre-post measures., Setting: Community setting., Participants: Individuals (N=4100; mean age ± SD, 64.5±9.3y; 73.3% women) participating in the digital program., Interventions: A digital supervised education and exercise therapy., Main Outcome Measures: Self-reported analgesic use for knee/hip pain during the past month at baseline and 12-week follow-up, knee/hip numeric rating scale pain (0-10, a higher value indicating more pain), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 12 or Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 12 function subscale (0-100, higher values indicating better function). McNemar test, multivariable logistic regression, and linear random intercept model were used for statistical analyses., Results: Among participants, 61.4% and 49.4% were analgesic users at baseline and 12-week follow-up, respectively, (absolute reduction 12.0%; 95% confidence interval, 10.5-13.5). Being female, having hip OA, lower education, higher body mass index, living outside large metropolitan cities, coexisting rheumatoid arthritis, and walking difficulties were associated with higher odds of analgesic use at baseline. At both time points, persons not using analgesics at the time reported better outcomes. All groups but "new users" experienced improvements in their pain and function following participation in digital program with the greatest improvements observed among "quitters.", Conclusions: Engaging in a digital exercise and patient education program as a primary treatment for knee or hip OA was associated with a reduction in the use of analgesics. The greatest improvements were seen for those who stopped analgesic use. These results highlight the importance of providing effective first-line treatment to people with knee or hip OA., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of current strategies oriented to increase adherence to physical therapy in subjects with knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA)., Material and Methods: A systematic review of electronic databases was conducted from inception until March 2023. Studies with experimental interventions using strategies to increase adherence to physical therapy programs in subjects with knee or hip OA were included. A meta-analysis compared the effects of such interventions with usual care for adherence-related measures (primary outcome), and functional and pain outcomes, using standardized mean differences (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). GRADE was used to determine the strength of the resultant evidence and the external validity of the findings., Results: Fifteen articles, assessing 1,818 participants, were included. The interventions included cognitive-behavior strategies, telephone calls, internet-based interventions, communication technologies, and booster sessions. A meta-analysis revealed that the experimental interventions increased adherence over usual care with a moderate effect size of SMD = 0.39 (95%CI = 0.08-0.71) and moderate certainty in this evidence., Conclusion: Overall, this review supports that the strategies to promote adherence to physical therapy in individuals with knee and hip OA are effective. However, the positive impact on adherence rates does not always translate into improved clinical outcomes.

Objective: Difficulty walking is a primary reason that individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA) seek care. We examined the change in self-reported difficulty walking after participating in the Good Life With Osteoarthritis in Denmark (GLA:D) 8-week education and exercise program and assessed patient factors associated with improvement in difficulty walking., Methods: This was a registry-based cohort study of individuals in Denmark with knee OA who enrolled in GLA:D. Assessments were administered at baseline, program completion (~3 months), and 12 months. Our prespecified primary outcome was change in self-reported difficulty walking assessed using the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level walking item. Exposures included sociodemographic factors, measures of OA illness severity, comorbidities, and psychological factors. In those with baseline moderate/severe difficulty walking, using multivariable regression analysis, we assessed the relationship between exposures of interest and improvement to no/slight difficulty walking., Results: We included 5262 participants. Of 2178 (41.4%) individuals with baseline moderate/severe difficulty walking, 51.4% and 58.3% reported no/slight difficulty walking at 3 and 12 months, respectively. Greater self-efficacy, younger age, female sex, lower BMI, less intense knee pain, and better function at baseline were associated with greater likelihood of improvement in difficulty walking, whereas severe difficulty walking at baseline and back pain intensity were associated with decreased likelihood of improvement., Conclusion: More than half of those with baseline difficulty walking experienced substantial improvement after completing GLA:D and this improvement was maintained at 12 months. Several patient factors were associated with the outcome, suggesting that some individuals may require additional support and extended treatment., (Copyright © 2024 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)

Background: Osteoarthritis is a leading contributor to global disability. While evidence supports the effectiveness of Tai Chi in improving symptoms for people with hip/knee osteoarthritis, access to in-person Tai Chi classes may be difficult for many people. An unsupervised online Tai Chi intervention for people with osteoarthritis can help overcome accessibility barriers. The Approach to Human-Centered, Evidence-Driven Adaptive Design (AHEAD) framework provides a practical guide for co-designing such an intervention., Objective: This study aims to develop an unsupervised online Tai Chi program for people with hip/knee osteoarthritis., Methods: An iterative process was conducted using the AHEAD framework. Initially, a panel of Tai Chi instructors and people with osteoarthritis was assembled. A literature review was conducted to inform the content of a survey (survey 1), which was completed by the panel and additional Australian Tai Chi instructors to identify Tai Chi movements for potential inclusion. Selection of Tai Chi movements was based on 3 criteria: those that were appropriate (for people with hip/knee osteoarthritis aged 45+ years), safe (to be performed at home unsupervised), and practical (to be delivered online using prerecorded videos). Movements that met these criteria were then ranked in a second survey (survey 2; using conjoint analysis methodology). Survey findings were discussed in a focus group, and the Tai Chi movements for program use were identified. A draft of the online Tai Chi program was developed, and a final survey (survey 3) was conducted with the panel to rate the appropriateness and safety of the proposed program. The final program was developed, and usability testing (think-aloud protocol) was conducted with people with knee osteoarthritis., Results: The panel consisted of 10 Tai Chi instructors and 3 people with osteoarthritis. The literature review identified Yang Style 24 as a common and effective Tai Chi style used in hip/knee osteoarthritis studies. Surveys 1 (n=35) and 2 (n=27) produced a ranked list of 24 Tai Chi movements for potential inclusion. This list was refined and informed by a focus group, with 10 Tai Chi movements being selected for inclusion (known as the Yang Style 10 form). Survey 3 (n=13) found that 92% (n=12) of the panel members believed that the proposed draft Tai Chi program was appropriate and safe, resulting in its adoption. The final program was produced and hosted on a customized website, "My Joint Tai Chi," which was further refined based on user feedback (n=5). "My Joint Tai Chi" is currently being evaluated in a randomized controlled trial., Conclusions: This study demonstrates the use of the AHEAD framework to develop an unsupervised online Tai Chi intervention ("My Joint Tai Chi") for people with hip/knee osteoarthritis. This intervention is now being tested for effectiveness and safety in a randomized controlled trial., (©Shiyi Julia Zhu, Kim L Bennell, Rana S Hinman, Jenny Harrison, Alexander J Kimp, Rachel K Nelligan. Originally published in JMIR Aging (https://aging.jmir.org), 30.09.2024.)

Background: The increasing global popularity of traditional Chinese exercise (TCE) provides substantial evidence of its significant efficacy in treating knee osteoarthritis (KOA). To assess the impact of different types of TCE and varying exercise durations on KOA patients, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on this topic., Methods: Two investigators extensively searched four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science) from their inception until December 16, 2023, to identify all relevant RCTs on the use of TCE for KOA treatment. The included studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool (CCRBT), and data analysis was performed using Stata 15.0., Results: A total of 20 RCTs, involving 1367 patients with KOA, met the inclusion criteria. Compared to the control group, TCE demonstrated significant improvement in three subscale scores of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) [Pain (SMD = -0.44; P = .0001); Stiffness (SMD = -0.35; P = .001); Physical function (SMD = -0.52; P = .0001)] and two subscale scores of the 36-item Short-Form (SF-36) [Physical score (WMD = 2.76; P = .001); Mental score (WMD = 2.49; P = .0001)] in KOA patients. Subgroup analysis showed that both long-term habitual exercise (over 12 weeks) and short-term exercise (within 12 weeks) were more effective than the control group in improving pain, joint stiffness, and physical function in KOA patients. Tai Chi, among the four TCE modalities analyzed, demonstrated improvements in all indicators., Conclusion: Based on the results of our meta-analysis, it can be concluded that both long-term and short-term TCE interventions are effective in alleviating the main symptoms of KOA and improving patients' physical function. However, due to limited methodological quality and inconsistent outcome measures in the included RCTs, further high-quality RCTs with larger sample sizes and longer-term interventions are necessary to validate our findings before TCE can be recommended as a treatment for KOA., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

In a randomized, controlled study, whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) was investigated as a promising alternative treatment technique compared to conventional strength training for the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Seventy-two overweight participants with symptomatic knee OA were randomly assigned to WB-EMS (n = 36) or a usual care group (UCG, n = 36). For seven months, the WB-EMS group received three times per fortnight a WB-EMS training, while the UCG was prescribed six-times physiotherapeutic treatments. We observed significant effects for the primary outcome "pain", as determined by the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), with more favourable changes in the WB-EMS group vs UCG (between-group difference 9.0 points, 95%CI 2.9-15.1, p = 0.004). Secondary outcomes, including the other KOOS subscales (symptoms, function in daily living, function in sports/recreational activities and quality of life), 7 day pain diary, hip/leg extensor strength and lower limb function (30s sit-to-stand test), were also statistically significant in favour of the WB-EMS group. Overall, WB-EMS was found to be effective in relieving knee pain symptoms and improving physical function in individuals with symptomatic knee OA compared to usual care treatment. WB-EMS could be used as an alternative therapy in the management of knee OA; particularly for patients that cannot be motivated for conventional training., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: This study delves into the intriguing connection between knee osteoarthritis and diabetes in Malaysia. Specifically, the exacerbation of knee osteoarthritis in the presence of diabetes in terms of symptoms, physical performance, physical activity, psychological status, social participation, and quality of life was discussed., Design: This cross-sectional study recruited adults aged 50 and above by convenient sampling and grouped them into: knee osteoarthritis-diabetes-, knee osteoarthritis+diabetes-, knee osteoarthritis-diabetes+, and knee osteoarthritis+diabetes+., Subjects/patients: Of 436 recruited participants, 261 (59.8%) participants reported knee osteoarthritis., Methods: Handgrip strength, Timed Up and Go test, 6 Meter Walk Test, and 5 Times Sit to Stand Test were measured using standardized procedures. Six questionnaires were administered for the remaining parameters., Results: Across groups, there were significant differences: 6 Meter Walk Test (p = 0.024), Timed Up and Go test (p = 0.020), and 5 Times Sit to Stand Test (p < 0.001), quality of life (p = 0.009), and physical activity (p = 0.036). Knee osteoarthritis+diabetes+ was independently associated with reduced handgrip strength, 5 Times Sit to Stand Test, quality of life, and physical inactivity after adjustment. Knee osteoarthritis+diabetes- was independently associated with reduced Timed Up and Go test and social isolation., Conclusion: The findings revealed the diabetic knee osteoarthritis subgroup's unique physical and psychosocial features of reduced muscle strength and physical inactivity. Future studies should investigate whether managing metabolic factors, and enhancing physical activity and strength exercises, can reduce knee osteoarthritis symptoms and disease severity.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare different intensities of aerobic exercise for patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in terms of glycemic control, pain relief, and functional outcomes., Methods: A prospective randomized open-label parallel multicenter clinical trial conducted at two hospitals in Shanghai and Sichuan that included 228 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Enrollment occurred between January 2021 and February 2023, and follow-up was completed in September 2023. Participants were randomized to threshold training/high-intensive stationary cycling training (n=76), intensive endurance/moderate-intensive stationary cycling training (n=77), and regular rehabilitation programs (n=75). The primary outcome at the 6-month follow-up was the HbA1c level. Key secondary outcomes included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscale of pain and quality of life., Results: Of 228 patients, 212 (93%) completed the trial. The mean adjusted (sex, baseline BMI, and baseline outcome measures) HbA1c level at the 6-month follow-up decreased significantly in the high-intensive training group compared with other groups (high-intensity group vs. control group; difference, 0.51%, 95% confidence interval, 0.05% to 1.15%). Mean KOOS subscales of pain and quality of life were statistically significantly different between the control group and moderate-intensity or high-intensity groups, but no statistical differences were noted between the different intensities of aerobic exercise. Patients in all groups achieved a greater reduction in BMI but no significant differences were observed between groups., Conclusion: In KOA and T2DM patients, high-intensity stationary cycling can significantly improve glycemic control compared with moderate-intensity and regular rehabilitation programs. However, high-intensity stationary cycling does not exert a superior effect on pain relief and functional improvement for KOA compared with moderate-intensity and regular rehabilitation programs., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Su, Huang, Tu and Lu.)

Background: Little is known about delivering telehealth from a healthcare provider's perspective., Purpose: To investigate physiotherapists' (PTs) experiences in delivering live online exercise and education for people with knee osteoarthritis (OA)., Methods: This was a qualitative individual interview study with a thematic analysis approach. The interviewees were six PTs delivering 8 weeks of supervised online exercise and education for people with knee OA in secondary public care in Denmark., Results: The three main themes were (1) From hands to words-on the transition from on-site to on-line physiotherapy, (2) Online selection-on the perceived barriers to managing a telehealth service and (3) Therapeutic relation under pressure-on the contextual difficulties in building relationships and alliances in online classes., Conclusion: The PTs in this study seemed to gradually come to terms with delivering first-line OA care online, appreciating advantages and new possibilities. PTs' initial apprehension towards this new form of physiotherapy service may be rooted in the traditional conception of physiotherapy as a predominantly manual profession but also in a lack of formal training in physiotherapy telehealth services. This study underlines the growing need for better and more formalised training in physiotherapy telehealth services to meet growing demands., (© 2024 The Author(s). Musculoskeletal Care published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

OBJECTIVES: To explore (1) initial feelings of people with knee osteoarthritis who are unexpectedly offered telerehabilitation, and (2) if their experiences met their expectations, and their willingness to use telerehabilitation in the future. DESIGN: Mixed-methods study of 122 people with knee osteoarthritis who were randomized to receive physiotherapist-delivered telerehabilitation in a clinical trial. METHODS: At enrollment in the trial, participants were unaware care would be delivered via telerehabilitation. At completion, quantitative (Likert scales, analyzed descriptively) and qualitative (open-text, underwent content/thematic analysis) questions asked participants about their initial feelings when randomized to telerehabilitation, if experiences met expectations, and willingness to use telerehabilitation in the future. RESULTS: Data were collected between October 2021 to March 2023. At enrollment, 44 (36% of 122) participants initially felt negative toward telerehabilitation ( doubts about effectiveness , physiotherapist can't see/touch , believe in-person is better , can't communicate effectively , not good with technology ), 18 (15%) were neutral, and 60 (49%) felt positive. After experiencing telerehabilitation, 43 (72%) people who were initially positive and 27 (61%) who were initially negative believed telerehabilitation exceeded their expectations ( easier than expected , surprised by benefits/effectiveness , strong rapport with physiotherapist , convenience ). Twenty-eight (23% of 122) people were not at all or slightly willing to use telerehabilitation in future ( prefer hands-on , doesn't allow adequate assessment/observation , prefer in-person , don't like telerehabilitation ). CONCLUSION: One in 2 people were positive about telerehabilitation from the outset, and 6 in 10 people who initially felt negative about telerehabilitation found that their experiences were better than expected. One in 4 people were unwilling to use telerehabilitation in the future, even after they had experienced it. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(9):1-14. Epub 11 June 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12383 .

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability among the elderly and is often exacerbated by obesity. Research supports weight loss and exercise therapy as key strategies for managing knee OA-related disability. Concurrently, telemedicine is becoming a popular healthcare approach. This study aimed to develop and evaluate an 8-week tele-education programme's impact on weight control and knee OA outcomes., Methods/design: Participants with knee OA and obesity were included. Baseline data on pain (VAS index), physical activity (GPAQ questionnaire), and quality of life (EQ5D and KOOS questionnaires) were collected. Performance tests, including the 30-second Chair Stand test (30CST) and the Timed Up-and-Go test (TUG), were recorded. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: a control group receiving oral advice on diet and exercise, and an intervention group receiving educational videos on nutrition, lifestyle changes, physical activity, individualised exercises, and psychosocial support. Evaluations were repeated after 8 weeks., Results: Data from 25 of 30 participants were analysed. In the intervention group, body composition, waist, and abdominal circumference decreased significantly (p < 0.05). The KOOS questionnaire showed significant improvements in pain, activity, and daily tasks (p = 0.00). The EQ5D questionnaire and health satisfaction also showed positive results within the intervention group (p = 0.00) and between groups (p = 0.008). The pain index improved significantly within (p = 0.00) and between groups (p = 0.02). Functional test results were significant within the intervention group (p = 0.00) and between groups (p = 0.017 for 30CST and p = 0.004 for TUG)., Conclusion: An 8-week tele-education programme for weight control and exercise therapy in knee OA patients significantly improved body composition, quality of life, and functional performance. Given the costs of obesity and knee OA on both people and the health system, tele-education can be a cost-effective treatment strategy., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Core muscles constitute the centre of the kinetic chain, and core exercises have been effective in improving outcomes in many postsurgical lower extremity musculoskeletal conditions. However, the literature on the implementation of core exercises after TKA has not been summarised., Objective: The objective was to review the evidence on the effect of core exercises on clinical and functional outcomes after TKA in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA)., Methods: PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and ProQuest databases were explored with appropriate keywords for studies published on the effect of core exercises on TKA from inception to 1 April 2024. Two authors independently screened the titles and abstracts and full-texts, and a third author solved the discrepancies. Risk of bias assessment was done with the Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal tool. The final articles were systematically summarised., Results: A total of 1485 records were retrieved. Sixty-four articles were included for screening full-texts, and four articles were ultimately included. Core exercises were administered for three to 6 weeks. The administration of core exercises along with the standard knee rehabilitation programme significantly improved balance, mobility, knee function, transverse abdominis muscle thickness, transversus abdominis contraction, and quality of life after TKA (p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Core exercises can be administered as an adjunct to standard rehabilitation programs to improve clinical and functional outcomes after TKA. However, there is a dearth of literature in this domain, and more studies are warranted., Trial Registration: PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42024542992., (© 2024 The Author(s). Musculoskeletal Care published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Perceptions, experiences, facilitators, and inhibitors of disease among patients may be shaped by their lifestyle and cultural background. Despite the significance of understanding their perspectives and experiences about disease for the prevention and management of osteoarthritis (OA) through physiotherapy, this subject has not been explored among patients with knee OA (PKOA) from lower and middle-income countries (LMICs)., Purpose: This study aims to explore the perception, and experiences of knee OA and physiotherapy treatment and identify the facilitators and inhibitors of physiotherapy treatment in PKOA from a lower- and middle-income country, India., Method: 40 PKOA (n = 10 in each Kellgren and Lawrence grade) will be recruited using a purposive sampling technique. Data will be collected through semi-structured interviews which are composed of pre-determined open-ended questions. Based on patients' flexibility and feasibility, the interview will be conducted face-to-face or by telephone or videoconference. The interview will be recorded using a digital audio recorder. Recorded data will be transcribed verbatim. Data will be analysed using thematic analysis based on the Braun and Clark approach., Results: The verbatim transcript will be evaluated to identify sub-themes and themes through thematic analysis. Generated data will be investigated through inductive qualitative analysis to examine the viewpoints of PKOA., Conclusion: This study will explore the patients' perspectives, experiences, and the factors which will facilitate and inhibit the physiotherapy treatment for knee osteoarthritis. The result might reveal a new way to promote insightful decision-making towards physiotherapy care for PKOA and help to improve their access to physiotherapy care., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aim: To measure the level of adherence of patients with primary knee osteoarthritis (KOA) to an interventional therapeutic and rehabilitation programme and investigate factors that hinder patients' adherence., Methods: A total of 154 participants with primary knee osteoarthritis (KOA) were divided into intervention and control groups. The intervention protocol included patient education on the nature and treatment of KOA, therapeutic exercise, a weight loss programme for overweight patients, and a physical therapy programme. Participants were followed for 3 months. The Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS-p), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and knee Kellgren-Lawrence OA grading were measured before and after the intervention. Additionally, the Morisky adherence questionnaire and the WHO Multidimensional Framework for factors affecting adherence were assessed., Results: One fifty four participants with KOA were randomly allocated into intervention and control groups. A low level of adherence was detected in both groups (68.8% in the intervention group vs. 84.4% in the control group). Patients who followed the interventional programme were more adherent. Adherence to therapy was associated with a reduction in the Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS-p) (p = 0.016) and improved function as measured by WOMAC (p = 0.018). Factors primarily associated with patient non-adherence included unemployment (67.8%), low income (59.3%), no previous response to therapy (58.5%), less frequent follow-up visits (55.1%), lack of insurance (66.9%), difficult access to services (59.3%), and high cost of services (55.1%)., Conclusion: Adherence to treatment in OA patients is a significant concern and a common problem, appearing to be associated more with socioeconomic factors than with pain and function., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Barriers and facilitators of general practitioners (GPs), physiotherapists (PTs), and people with hip and knee osteoarthritis (PwOA) may influence uptake of and referral to guideline-based exercise treatments for OA., Objective: To identify barriers and facilitators of GPs, PTs and PwOA to uptake of and referral to exercise treatments for OA., Methods: An online survey was circulated to GPs, PTs, and PwOA in Ireland from March to September 2021. Data were collected on demographics, barriers and facilitators, and referral patterns to exercise treatments for OA. Frequency distributions were used to illustrate demographics, barriers and facilitators, and referral patterns to exercise treatments for OA., Results: 388 stakeholders responded (GPs = 148; PTs = 154; PwOA = 86). Barriers and facilitators were related to (1) stakeholder (e.g., patient tiredness and fatigue), (2) healthcare setting (e.g., appropriate referrals from GP or other sources), and (3) treatment (e.g., low-cost community-based exercise programmes) factors. While 91% of GPs would refer PwOA to physiotherapy if no barriers existed, only 60% would in their current practice. Only 33% of PwOA reported receiving a GP referral to physiotherapy., Conclusion: Stakeholder, healthcare setting and treatment barriers and facilitators of GPs, PTs, and PwOA influence uptake of and referral to exercise treatments for OA. Future strategies Future strategies addressing these factors may improve implementation of guideline-based management for OA. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To compare the efficacy of interferential current (IFC) therapy combined with quadriceps strengthening exercise versus sham IFC plus exercise for pain relief and functional improvement in patients with knee osteoarthritis., Study Design: Double-blind randomised controlled trial., Setting: Outpatient rehabilitation clinic., Subjects: Knee osteoarthritis patients aged 50-85 years with a pain score ≥4/10., Methods: One hundred forty-four participants were randomly allocated into the study and control groups. The study group received 20 min of IFC therapy (carrier frequency: 4000 Hz, beat frequency: 100 Hz) five times per week for three weeks, while the control group received sham IFC following the same protocol, followed by 10 min of exercise in both groups. Outcome measures included Numeric Rating Scale for Pain, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC) score, gait speed, and EuroQol-Five Dimensions-Five Levels questionnaire assessed at baseline, Week 3, and Week 6. Adverse events and patient satisfaction were evaluated at Week 3., Results: At Week 3, the study group demonstrated statistical improvement compared to the control group for Numeric Rating Scale for Pain, WOMAC Total, WOMAC Pain, and WOMAC Stiffness. The mean difference (95% confidence interval) between groups was 0.76 (0.21-1.30), 0.49 (0.03-0.95), 0.63 (0.13-1.13), and 0.62 (0.04-1.20), respectively. However, the mean differences between groups were below the Minimally Clinically Important Difference values for each outcome. Additionally, there were no significant differences between groups at Week 6 for any outcome measure., Conclusion: IFC had no effect on pain reduction and functional improvement in patients with mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objective: To investigate whether duration of knee symptoms influenced the magnitude of the effect of exercise therapy compared to non-exercise control interventions on pain and physical function in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA)., Method: We undertook an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis utilising IPD stored within the OA Trial Bank from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing exercise to non-exercise control interventions among people with knee OA. IPD from RCTs were analysed to determine the treatment effect by considering both study-level and individual-level covariates in the multilevel regression model. To estimate the interaction effect (i.e., treatment x duration of symptoms (dichotomised)), on self-reported pain or physical function (standardised to 0-100 scale), a one-stage multilevel regression model was applied., Results: We included IPD from 1767 participants with knee OA from 10 RCTs. Significant interaction effects between the study arm and symptom duration (≤1 year vs >1 year, and ≤2 years vs>2 years) were found for short- (∼3 months) (Mean Difference (MD) -3.57, 95%CI -6.76 to -0.38 and -4.12, 95% CI-6.58 to -1.66, respectively) and long-term (∼12 months) pain outcomes (MD -8.33, 95%CI -12.51 to -4.15 and -8.00, 95%CI -11.21 to -4.80, respectively), and long-term function outcomes (MD -5.46, 95%CI -9.22 to -1.70 and -4.56 95%CI -7.33 to-1.80, respectively)., Conclusions: This IPD meta-analysis demonstrated that people with a relatively short symptom duration benefit more from therapeutic exercise than those with a longer symptom duration. Therefore, there seems to be a window of opportunity to target therapeutic exercise in knee OA., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The integration of telehealth-supported programs in chronic disease management has become increasingly common. However, its effectiveness for individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) remains unclear., Objective: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of telehealth-supported exercise or physical activity programs for individuals with KOA., Methods: A comprehensive literature search encompassing Embase, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, PEDro, GreyNet, and medRxiv from inception to September 2023 was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing telehealth-supported exercise or physical activity programs to a control condition for KOA. Data were extracted and qualitatively synthesized across eligible studies, and a meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effects. The study was reported according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020., Results: In total, 23 studies met eligibility criteria, with 20 included in the meta-analysis. Results showed that telehealth-supported exercise or physical activity programs reduced pain (g=-0.39; 95% CI -0.67 to -0.11; P<.001), improved physical activity (g=0.13; 95% CI 0.03-0.23; P=.01), and enhanced physical function (g=-0.51; 95% CI -0.98 to -0.05; P=.03). Moreover, significant improvements in quality of life (g=0.25; 95% CI 0.14-0.36; P<.001), self-efficacy for pain (g=0.72; 95% CI 0.53-0.91; P<.001), and global improvement (odds ratio 2.69, 95% CI 1.41-5.15; P<.001) were observed. However, self-efficacy for physical function (g=0.14; 95% CI -0.26 to 0.53; P=.50) showed insignificant improvements. Subgroup analyses based on the World Health Organization classification of digital health (pain: χ 2 2 =6.5; P=.04 and physical function: χ 2 2 =6.4; P=.04), the type of teletechnology in the intervention group (pain: χ 2 4 =4.8; P=.31 and function: χ 2 4 =13.0; P=.01), and active or inactive controls (pain: χ 2 1 =5.3; P=.02 and physical function: χ 2 1 =3.4; P=.07) showed significant subgroup differences., Conclusions: Telehealth-supported exercise or physical activity programs might reduce knee pain and improve physical activity, physical function, quality of life, self-efficacy, and global improvement in individuals with KOA. Future research should consider longer implementation durations and assess the feasibility of incorporating wearables and standardized components into large-scale interventions to evaluate the effects., Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42022359658; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display&#95;record.php?RecordID=359658., (©Xiao-Na Xiang, Ze-Zhang Wang, Jing Hu, Jiang-Yin Zhang, Ke Li, Qi-Xu Chen, Fa-Shu Xu, Yue-Wen Zhang, Hong-Chen He, Cheng-Qi He, Si-Yi Zhu. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 02.08.2024.)

Objective: Photobiomodulation (PBM) is not implemented in routine clinical management for knee osteoarthritis. This study aims to systematically investigate the effects of PBM in patients with knee osteoarthritis, comparing with placebo to understand its true clinical effects., Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched up to October 2023. Randomized placebo-controlled trials applying PBM versus placebo were included. Study characteristics, intervention parameters, and patient-reported and physical examination outcome measures were collected. The risk of bias was judged using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (version 2) and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to interpret the certainty of results., Results: Ten studies were included comprising 542 participants. All studies were judged with unclear to a high risk of bias. Meta-analysis for pain at rest (6 studies) showed that PBM significantly reduced pain at rest as compared to placebo (-0.7 [95% CI = -1.1 to -0.2]), moderate effect, very low certainty of evidence, whereas for the Timed "Up & Go" Test (three studies), no significant effect was detected. Statistically significantly within-group (PBM) mean improvement was detected for pain, Lequesne Index, and gait performance outcomes, but not always clinically relevant or significant when compared to placebo., Conclusion: PBM reduces pain intensity in patients with knee osteoarthritis and may improve disability. However, the very low certainty of evidence does not allow to recommend its isolated use but may be used to complement other widely recommended therapies. More rigorous clinical trials and the revision of the recommended dosage guidelines are warranted to increase the strength of evidence., Impact: The findings indicate that photobiomodulation can reduce pain and improve disability in patients with knee osteoarthritis. However, researchers should continue to investigate isolated photobiomodulation intervention versus placebo and extend the dosage guidelines to other types of light emitters., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Physical Therapy Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: To compare the clinical and cost effectiveness of the Collaborative Model of Care between Orthopaedics and Allied Healthcare Professionals (CONNACT), a community-based, stratified, multidisciplinary intervention consisting of exercise, education, psychological and nutrition delivered through a chronic care model to usual hospital care in adults with knee osteoarthritis (OA)., Methods: Pragmatic, parallel-arm, single-blinded superiority RCT trial. Community-dwelling, ambulant adults with knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade > 1; Knee Injury and OA Outcome Score (KOOS 4 ) ≤75) were enrolled. Primary outcome was KOOS 4 at 12-months; secondary outcomes included: quality of life, physical performance measures, symptom satisfaction, psychological outcomes, dietary habits, and global perceived effect. Intention-to-treat analysis using generalized linear model (GLM) and regression modeling were conducted. Economic evaluation through a societal approach was embedded., Results: 110 participants (55 control, 55 intervention) were randomized. No between-group difference found for the primary outcome (MD [95%CI]: -1.86 [-9.11. 5.38]), although both groups demonstrated within-group improvement over 12-months. Among the secondary outcomes, the CONNACT group demonstrated superior dietary change (12 months) and physical performance measures (3 months), and global perceived effect (6 months). While there was no between-group difference in total cost, significant productivity gains (reduced indirect cost) were seen in the CONNACT group., Conclusion: CONNACT was not superior to usual care at 1 year. Further efforts are needed to understand the underlying contextual and implementation factors in order to further improve and refine such community-based, stratified care models moving forward., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03809975. Registered January 18, 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03809975., (Copyright © 2024 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Smartphone-based interventions offer a promising approach to address inactivity in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA). We explored perceptions towards smartphone-based interventions to improve physical activity, pain, and depressed mood in inactive people with knee pain., Methods: This qualitative study included six focus groups at Boston University with inactive people with knee pain ( n  = 35). A smartphone app, developed by our team, using constructs of Social Cognitive Theory, was used to obtain participant feedback., Results: Participants discussed wanting to use smartphone-based interventions for personalized exercise advice, for motivation (e.g., customized voice messages, virtual incentives), and to make exercise "less boring" (e.g., music, virtual gaming). Preferred app features included video tutorials on how to use the app, the ability to select information that can be viewed on the home screen, and the ability to interact with clinicians. Features that received mixed responses included daily pain tracking, daily exercise reminders, peer-interaction for accountability, and peer-competition for motivation. All participants discussed privacy and health data security concerns while using the app., Conclusions: Using a co-design approach, we report preferences and concerns related to using smartphone-based physical activity interventions in inactive people with knee pain. This information may help improve acceptability of such interventions in this population.

Introduction: Joint instability is a common finding of clinical importance in patients with knee disease. This literature review aimed to examine the evidence regarding the effect of orthosis management on joint instability in knee joint disease., Methods: The detailed protocol for this study was published in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews in the field of health and social welfare (CRD 42022335360). A literature search was conducted on May 2023, using the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Xplore. A secondary search was manually conducted using Google Scholar to address publication bias. Each database search strategy was described, and the search was conducted by independent reviewers., Results: A total of 281 studies were retrieved, 11 articles were included in the systematic review. Of the 11 articles selected, the number of included diseases was 2 for osteoarthritis, 7 for anterior cruciate ligament injuries, and 3 for posterior cruciate ligament injuries. In result, orthosis management may improve self-reported instability and functional assessment in patients with osteoarthritis, anterior cruciate ligament injury, and posterior cruciate ligament injury. However, an objective evaluation of anatomical instability did not indicate an improvement in joint instability., Conclusion: The effects of orthosis management on knee instability might improve physical function and self-reported instability., (Copyright © 2023 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Purpose: The aim of this review was to provide a qualitative and quantitative overview of the effects of exercise on pain, physical function, and quality of life for patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis., Materials and Methods: This study was an umbrella and mapping review with meta-meta-analysis. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials were included. The methodological quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the Modified Quality Assessment Scale for Systematic Reviews and the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews tool. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Grading Criteria., Results: 41 meta-analyses were included, 43.9% of the studies had adequate methodological quality, and 56.1% of the studies had a low risk of bias. Moderate evidence was found that exercise decreases pain intensity (33 meta-analyses; SMD = -0.49; 95% CI -0.56 to -0.42), improves function (19 meta-analyses; SMD = -0.50; 95% CI -0.58 to -0.41), strength (6 meta-analyses; SMD = -0.57; 95% CI -0.70 to -0.44) and quality of life (SMD = -0.36; 95% CI -0.46 to -0.27) for patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis., Conclusion: Exercise is an effective intervention to decrease pain intensity and improve function in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis.(PROSPERO, CRD42020221987).

Background: Knee arthritis is a destructive disorder that affects the knee joints and causes pain and reduced mobility. Drug treatments, weight loss, and exercise control the symptoms of the disease, but these methods only delay the disease process and eventually, knee joint replacement surgery will be needed. After surgery, with the help of a proper physiotherapy program, full recovery takes an average of 6-12 months. However, currently, there is no similar tool to facilitate this process in Iran., Objective: The purpose of this research is to design and develop the prototype of a rehabilitation system for patients after knee replacement surgery, which provides patients with information and appropriate physiotherapy programs., Methods: This study was development-applied and was done in three stages. In the first stage, the needs and content of education and therapeutic exercises were prepared in the form of a checklist, and then the necessity of each item was checked in the evaluation sessions. In the second stage, the prototype of the system was developed using Adobe XD software and based on the requirements approved from the previous stage. In the third stage, the usability of the program was analyzed from the point of view of experts using the exploratory evaluation method with Nielsen's 13 principles of usability., Results: At first, the system requirements were extracted and prepared in two checklists of content (51 exercises) and capabilities (60 items). Then after a survey of experts based on the Delphi technique, content information (43 exercises) and functional and non-functional requirements (53 items) were obtained. A survey of experts helped to finalize the information elements, categorize them, and prepare the final version of the checklists. Based on this, the system requirements were classified into 11 categories, and the training content was classified into 3 training periods. Finally, the design and development of the system was done. This system has admin, physician, and patient user interfaces. The result of usability showed that this system is efficient and there are only a few problems in the feature of helping users to detect and recover from errors., Conclusion: It seems necessary to develop a system based on the principles of usability by therapists and rehabilitation specialists to train and monitor the remote rehabilitation process of patients after knee joint replacement at home. And the importance of involving stakeholders in the design and development of remote rehabilitation systems is not hidden from anyone. Kara system has all of the above., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: To identify within-stakeholder agreement and between-stakeholder differences in beliefs regarding exercise for osteoarthritis among general practitioners (GPs), physiotherapists (PTs) and people with hip and knee osteoarthritis (PwOA). A secondary objective was to explore the association between referral patterns and beliefs of PwOA., Design: Cross-sectional., Setting: Online surveys administered to GPs, PTs and PwOA in Ireland via social media and healthcare networks., Participants: 421 valid responses (n=161 GPs, n=163 PTs, n=97 PwOA)., Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures: Nine belief statements related to exercise effectiveness, safety and delivery were rated on a 5-point Likert scale and analysed for within-stakeholder consensus. χ 2 tests assessed differences in agreement between groups. Multivariable linear regression models tested associations between beliefs in PwOA and referral to/attendance at physiotherapy., Results: Positive within-stakeholder consensus (>75% agreement) was reached for most statements (7/9 GPs, 6/9 PTs, 5/9 PwOA). However, beliefs of PwOA were significantly less positive compared with healthcare professionals for six statements. All stakeholders disagreed that exercise is effective regardless of the level of pain. Attendance at physiotherapy (49% of PwOA), rather than referral to physiotherapy from a GP only, was associated with positive exercise beliefs for PwOA (β=0.287 (95% CI 0.299 to 1.821))., Conclusions: Beliefs about exercise therapy for osteoarthritis are predominantly positive across all stakeholders, although less positive in PwOA. PwOA are more likely to have positive beliefs if they have seen a PT for their osteoarthritis. Knowledge translation should highlight the effectiveness of exercise for all levels of pain and osteoarthritis disease., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: To evaluate whether the knee adduction moment (KAM) could be reduced by a short instruction in the Draw-in (DI) maneuver in healthy adults, and whether knee joint function would improve with a longer DI gait intervention in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA)., Method: In Study 1, healthy adults received 10 minutes supervised instruction in DI gait in and then practiced the gait independently for 10 minutes. Three-dimensional motion analysis measurement was performed in each phase. In Study 2, patients with OA performed a 20-minute DI gait intervention daily for 6 weeks. At baseline and after 6 weeks, knee pain, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the MOS 8 item Short-Form Health Survey, thoracic kyphosis angle, knee joint range of motion, knee extension muscle strength, hip abduction muscle strength, and activity level were evaluated., Results: In Study 1, the DI gait to decrease KAM could be learning following only 10 minutes of instruction and 10 minutes of self-practice in healthy adults. In Study 2, knee pain was reduced by 19 % and the thoracic kyphosis angle was reduced by 2.6° after 6 weeks. No significant changes in other parameters were detected, and the implementation rate was 86 ± 14 %., Significance: In healthy adults, DI gait instruction for 10 minutes of instruction and 10 minutes of self-practice reduced the KAM. In patients with knee OA, 20 minutes of DI gait per day for 6 weeks may reduce knee pain and thoracic kyphosis., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Ota S is co-CEO of M-Support, LLC, and he has a royalty contract with Matsumoto Prosthetic ＆ Orthotics Manufacturing CO．LTD. However, the company had no control over the design, analysis, interpretation, writing, or publication of this study., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Knee osteoarthritis is associated with deficits in muscle strength, muscle mass, and physical functioning. These muscle-related deficits are acutely exacerbated following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and persist long after surgery, despite the application of standardized rehabilitation programs that include physical/functional training. Resistance exercise training (RET) has been shown to be a highly effective strategy to improve muscle-related outcomes in healthy as well as clinical populations. However, the use of RET in traditional rehabilitation programs after TKA is limited. In this narrative review, we provide an updated view on whether adding RET to the standard rehabilitation (SR) in the recovery period (up to 1 year) after TKA leads to greater improvements in muscle-related outcomes when compared to SR alone. Overall, research findings clearly indicate that both muscle strength and muscle mass can be improved to a greater extent with RET-based rehabilitation compared to SR. Additionally, measures of physical functioning that rely on quadriceps strength and balance (e.g., stair climbing, chair standing, etc.) also appear to benefit more from a RET-based program compared to SR, especially in patients with low levels of physical functioning. Importantly though, for RET to be optimally effective, it should be performed at 70%-80% of the one-repetition maximum, with 3-4 sets per exercise, with a minimum of 3 times per week for 8 weeks. Based upon this narrative review, we recommend that such high-intensity progressive RET should be incorporated into standard programs during rehabilitation after TKA., (© 2024 The Authors. European Journal of Sport Science published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European College of Sport Science.)

Objective: To investigate the effect of diadynamic currents administered prior to exercises on pain and disability in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee., Design: A randomized-controlled trial., Setting: Special Rehabilitation Services in Taboão da Serra., Participants: Patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis., Intervention: Participants were randomly allocated to Group I (diadynamic currents and exercises; n = 30, 60 knees) or Group II (exercises alone; n = 30, 60 knees) and were treated three times a week for 8 weeks., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measures were change in knee pain evaluated by visual analog scale and disability Index Score (Lequesne). Secondary outcomes included change in mobility (Timed Up and Go test), range of motion (goniometer), muscle strength (dynamometer), a composite score for pain and disability (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis questionnaire), and a drug diary to measure consumption of rescue pain medication (paracetamol). All measurements were collected at baseline, 8 weeks, and 6 months from baseline (follow-up)., Results: There were 60 participants with a mean (SD) age of 63.40 (8.20) years. Between-group differences in the follow-up (8 weeks and 6 months) were observed for pain at rest, pain during activities of daily living and disability. There was improvement in Group I that was maintained for the three variables 6 months after treatment. Mean difference for pain at rest was -3.08 points (95% confidence interval -4.13; -2.02), p  < 0.01 with an effect size of 1.4; mean difference for pain during activities of daily living was -2.40 points (95% confidence interval -3.34; -1.45), p  < 0.01 with an effect size of 1.24; and mean difference for disability was -4.08 points (95% confidence interval -5.89; -2.26), p  < 0.01 with an effect size of 1.04., Conclusion: Patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis receiving 8 weeks of treatment with diadynamic currents as an adjunct to a program of exercises had significantly greater improvements in pain and disability than those receiving exercises alone. Beneficial effects were sustained for 6 months., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this study. Mark I. Johnson's declares that in the previous 5 years his employer has received income for expert consultancy services that he has undertaken for GSK plc, TENSCare, and LifeCare Ltd. that lie outside of the submitted work. Mark I. Johnson also declares book royalties from Oxford University Press.

Objective: The aim of the study is to assess the relationship between walking exercise and medial joint space narrowing progression, symptoms, and knee extensor muscle strength in early knee osteoarthritis patients., Methods: This nested cohort study within the Osteoarthritis Initiative included participants aged 50 yrs and older with knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grades 0-2). Walking exercisers were identified using a modified Historical Physical Activity Survey Instrument. Differences in medial joint space narrowing, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and knee extensor muscle strength were evaluated through the three-way analysis of variance., Results: Among 896 participants, 83.4% reported walking exercise. Female walkers showed significant improvements in symptoms (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-pain: P < 0.001; Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-symptom: P < 0.001; Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-quality of life: P < 0.001; Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-function, sports, and recreational activities: P = 0.007). Similar results were observed in male walkers (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-pain: P < 0.001; Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-symptom: P < 0.001; Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-quality of life: P = 0.001; Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-function, sports, and recreational activities: P = 0.009). Walkers showed significantly increased knee extensor muscle strength at 24 mos (female: P < 0.001; male: P = 0.003). Female nonwalkers had significantly decreased knee extensor muscle strength at 24 mos ( P < 0.001). Walkers showed significant improvement in medial joint space narrowing (odds ratio = 1.1, 95% confidence interval = 1.0-1.2) and Kellgren-Lawrence grade (OR = 1.0, 95% CI = 1.0-1.1) compared with nonwalkers., Conclusions: Walking exercise prevents structural progression and improves symptoms. Meanwhile, the increased knee extensor muscle strength in all walkers further supports the validity of recommending walking exercises for early-stage knee osteoarthritis patients., Competing Interests: Financial disclosure statements have been obtained, and no conflicts of interest have been reported by the authors or by any individuals in control of the content of this article., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To investigate the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of 2MST for assessing the physical performance of patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA)., Materials and Methods: Fifty-one patients with TKA, aged more than 18 years, of both sexes, and underwent a primary TKA at least six months ago, were included in this study. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval (CI), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimum detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC 95 ) were used to determine the reliability of 2MST. In the validity, the correlations of the 2MST between the six-minute walk test (6MWT) and the two-minute walk test (2MWT) were assessed., Results: The reliability of 2MST was excellent (ICC = 0.97, SEM = 2.76, MDC 95 = 7.6). There was a moderate correlation between 2MST and 6MWT ( r  = 0.586; p  = 0.000), as well as between 2MST and 2MWT ( r  = 0.633; p  = 0.000)., Conclusions: 2MST proved to be a reliable and valid physical performance test in patients with TKA. 2MST can be used to evaluate the physical performance of TKA patients.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05064943.

Background: The role of strengthening the lower limbs to optimize the biomechanics of the hip, knee and ankle during walking in patients with knee osteoarthritis, is still unclear. This study aimed to analyse the walking biomechanics of individuals with symptomatic mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis before and after a simplified lower limb resistance training protocol, focused on knee joint exercises with individualized load., Methods: Forty-one patients with symptomatic and radiographic mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis underwent 3D gait analysis pre-post 8 weeks lower limb resistance training protocol performed 3 times a week. Parameters investigated were spatiotemporal, sagittal range of motion, flexion and extension minimum and maximum values, power and moment of hip, knee and ankle, as well as self-reported pain and physical function by the Western Ontario MacMaster University Osteoarthritis Index. Paired t test, Wilcoxon, Spearman's correlation and a logistic model were used for statistical analysis, with p < 0.05. Pain improvement more than 2 points was considered clinically relevant. The effect size (ES) was calculated using Cohen's d., Results: Post protocol walking speed increased 6.7% (ES: 0.711), cadence 3.7% (ES: 0.655), stride length 2.6% (ES: 0.542), and double support time reduced 6.9% (ES:0.459). It was also observed a significant increase in one maximum repetition test for legpress 46%, knee extension 23% and knee flexion chair 27% (p < 0.001). Patients reported a 62.5% reduction in pain (ES:1.518) and 64.9% improvement in physical function (ES:1.376). 82% of the patients presented more than 2 points improvement in pain. No evidence of strong correlations between pain, strength gains and gait parameters were found., Conclusions: There was a significant and clinical improvement of spatiotemporal gait parameters, pain, physical function, and strength after 8-week lower limb resistance training protocol. Patients who had a clinically relevant pain improvement presented better gait performance., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: An increasing body of evidence suggests that home-based exercise (HBE) therapy has significant therapeutic effects on knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and hip osteoarthritis (HipOA), and it has advantages such as cost savings, strong operability, and good compliance compared with hospitalization and exercise courses., Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of HBE in the treatment of KOA and HipOA., Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase to collect randomized controlled trials. The retrieval time was from database establishment until March 6, 2024. Stata 15.1 software was used for data analysis., Results: A total of 16 randomized controlled trials involving 3,015participants were included, with 1,519 participants in the intervention group and 1,496 in the control group. The meta-analysis showed that, compared to the control group, HBE can significantly improve pain [SMD=-0.38, 95% CI (-0.58, -0.18); P = 0.001], joint function      [SMD=-0.60, 95% CI (-1.01, -0.19); P = 0.004], balance ability [SMD=-0.67, 95% CI (-1.00, -0.34); P = 0.001], mobility (ADL) [SMD = 0.51, 95% CI (0.19, 0.82); P = 0.002] in patients with KOA and HipOA. There is no statistical difference in the improvement of joint stiffness [WMD = -0.80, 95% CI (-1.61, 0.01); P = 0.052]. In addition, subgroup analysis showed that HBE significantly improved pain, joint function, and balance ability in KOA patients compared with the control group. HipOA patients showed significant improvement in pain and joint function; However, HBE only improved activity ability in patients with comorbidities of KOA and HipOA., Conclusion: HBE can effectively alleviate pain, improve joint function, and enhance physical function in patients with KOA and HipOA. However, more high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with large sample sizes and long-term interventions are needed to validate the efficacy of HBE due to limitations in the methodology and consistency of indicator outcomes in the included RCTs., Registration Number: We've registered with PROSPERO, and the number is CRD42023443085., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Telerehabilitation is a promising avenue to enhance post-total knee arthroplasty (TKA) rehabilitation by improving accessibility, convenience and cost-effectiveness. Despite its potential benefits, its application in the context of TKA in Iran is in its early stages, lacking comprehensive studies on feasibility, acceptance and programme adherence. This article outlines a protocol for an open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial investigating the impact of a 4 week telerehabilitation programme alongside usual care., Methods: Thirty patients (aged 50-90) undergoing TKA for severe Knee Osteoarthritis at Atiyeh Hospital in Tehran, Iran, will be recruited using block randomisation. Participants will be assigned to either the intervention group, receiving telerehabilitation or the control group without telerehabilitation. The intervention will include virtual physiotherapy sessions thrice weekly, lasting 30-45 min each, over 4 weeks. The primary objective is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of telerehabilitation, measured through recruitment and attrition rates, questionnaire completion rates, patient satisfaction using appropriate questionnaire and adherence to the intervention. Secondary outcomes encompass four Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score questionnaire subscales (function in Activities of Daily Living, Pain, Symptoms, Quality of Life). Patient global assessment will use a standardised question. An online survey will evaluate walking assistant device usage, exercise adherence and adverse events. The number of individuals receiving in-person rehabilitation will be documented after the first postoperative surgeon visit. Assessments occur at baseline and 4 weeks postsurgery., Analysis: Statistical analysis, including independent samples t-test, paired samples t-test, χ2 test, Fisher's exact test, analysis of covariance and multiple linear regression, will use SPSS software version 16, with significance set at p<0.05., Ethics and Dissemination: Approved by AJA University of Medical Sciences Ethics Committee (IR.AJAUMS.REC.1402.126), trial results will be presented to relevant groups and published in peer-reviewed journals., Trial Registration Number: TCTR20231020004., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: To examine the applicability and process of change of Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) in the management of pain and disability in people with knee osteoarthritis who were offered knee replacement surgery and had risk factors for poor response to surgery., Methods: Single-case experimental design with a mixed-methods, repeated measures approach was used to investigate the process of change through CFT in four participants. Qualitative interviews investigated beliefs, behaviours and coping responses, and self-reported measures assessed pain, disability, psychological factors, and function at 25 timepoints. Study registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619001491156)., Results: Qualitative data indicate that CFT promoted helpful changes in all participants, with two responses observed. One reflected a clear shift to a biopsychosocial conceptualisation of osteoarthritis, behavioural re-engagement and the view that a knee replacement was no longer necessary. The other response reflected a mixed conceptualisation with dissonant beliefs about osteoarthritis and its management. Psychological and social factors were identified as potential treatment barriers. Overall, quantitative measures supported the qualitative findings., Conclusion: The process of change varies between and within individuals over time. Psychological and social barriers to treatment have implications for future intervention studies for the management of knee osteoarthritis.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONCognitive Functional Therapy is applicable in the management of knee osteoarthritis.Reconceptualisation of osteoarthritis reflected a helpful change.Psychological and social factors emerged as barriers to recovery.

Background: The primary aim of this study was to longitudinally examine the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on physical performance measures including Gait Speed and Chair Stand tests over 8 years of follow-up in people with or at risk of knee osteoarthritis (OA)., Design: A prospective longitudinal study., Setting: Multisite community based., Population: This study included participants with or at risk of knee OA aged from 45 to 79 years from the Osteoarthritis Initiative from baseline to 96 months follow-up., Methods: The participants performed physical performance measures using a 20 m Walk Test for Gait Speed and 5 Times Sit To Stand for repeated chair stand test time at baseline and during follow-up visits. Participants were asked about the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) at baseline and categorized into with or without DM. Generalized estimating equations were utilized with 2 models, one for DM and Gait Speed and the other for DM and Repeated Chair Stand Test after controlling for covariates including age, sex, education, Body Mass Index (BMI), depressive symptoms, physical activity level, baseline number of comorbidities, and baseline Kellgren and Lawrence grades for OA grading for each knee., Results: A total of 4796 participants were included and categorized into those with DM (N.=362) and without DM (N.=4311) at baseline. Participants with DM at baseline showed significantly declined gait speed (B=-0.048, 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI]: [-0.07, -0.02], P<0.001) and significantly an increased time for repeated chair stand test (B=0.49, 95% CI: [0.08, 0.89], P=0.018) over time when compared to those without DM at baseline, after controlling for covariates., Conclusions: DM was associated with negative impact on Gait Speed and Repeated Chair Stand Test time in individuals with or at risk of knee OA. Individuals with knee OA and diabetes who exhibit declining physical performance measures are at risk of functional dependence, reduced quality of life, and complex rehabilitation requirements.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of motivational interviewing (MI) and mindfulness (MF) added to neuromuscular (NM) exercises on improving pain, function, balance, and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA)., Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on sixty patients who were randomly assigned to the MI + NM, MF + NM, and NM groups. The groups received four training sessions for six weeks. Physical function with Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index timed up and go, going up and down eight stairs, pain with visual analogue scale, quality of life with SF 36 , and balance with Biodex were evaluated before and after interventions., Results: Within-group comparisons showed that NM + MI, NM + MF, and NM groups experienced significant improvement in all factors after six-week ( p  < 0.05). However, between groups, comparisons in the post-test revealed that the MI + NM group had a more significant effect on pain, function, and static balance than the MF + NM group. Nevertheless, the MF + NM group improved the quality of life better than the MI + NM and NM groups ( p  < 0.05)., Conclusion: Adding psychological interventions to physical exercises had a better effect on improving the symptoms of patients. Additionally, the MI showed more effectiveness in improving the symptoms of patients.

Background: Lower limb osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability and can affect an individual's ability to work., Objectives: To explore Australian physiotherapists' use of work-related interventions in managing patients with lower limb OA, and identify current management practices., Methods: Physiotherapists with at least two years of experience treating patients with lower limb OA were invited to complete an online survey to understand how physiotherapists manage patients with lower limb OA, specifically regarding interventions related to work., Results: A total of 132 physiotherapists completed the survey. In free text responses, only 1.5% and 2.3% of physiotherapists nominated work-related items in their key components of treatment or educational topics discussed with patients with lower limb OA, respectively. From a range of work-related activities presented, over half of physiotherapists indicated they regularly/always provided education about the benefits of remaining in work (63.5%) and advice on managing symptoms at work (57.4%). Less than 10% of physiotherapists regularly/always used a validated scale to identify barriers for work (9.6%), discussed absences from work (9.6%), conducted a workplace assessment (4.4%), and discussed submitting workers' compensation claims (2.6%). Exercise and patient education were the most frequently nominated physiotherapy treatments in free text (96.2% and 86.3%, respectively) and fixed response (99.2% and 93.9%, respectively) questions., Conclusion: Many physiotherapists do not address work-related activities in their management of patients with lower limb OA. In light of work-related challenges commonly experienced by individuals with lower limb OA, this is an important aspect of management of this condition., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors declare they have no conflicting interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Targeted efforts to better understand the barriers and facilitators of stakeholders and healthcare settings to implementation of exercise and education self-management programmes for osteoarthritis (OA) are needed. This study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA:D), a supervised group guideline-based OA programme, across Irish public and private healthcare settings. Interviews with 10 physiotherapists (PTs; 8 public) and 9 people with hip and knee OA (PwOA; 4 public) were coded by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) constructs in a case memo (summary, rationale, quotes). The strong positive/negative implementation determinants were identified collaboratively by rating the valence and strength of CFIR constructs on implementation. Across public and private settings, PTs and PwOA strongly perceived GLA:D Ireland as evidence-based, with easily accessible education and modifiable marketing/training materials that meet participants' needs, improve skills/confidence and address exercise beliefs/expectations. Despite difficulties in scheduling sessions (e.g., work/caring responsibilities), PTs in public and private settings perceived advantages to implementation over current clinical practice (e.g., shortens waiting lists). Only PTs in public settings reported limited availability of internal/external funding, inappropriate space, marketing/training tools, and inadequate staffing. Across public and private settings, PwOA reported adaptability, appropriate space/equipment and coaching/supervision, autonomy, and social support as facilitators. Flexible training and tailored education for stakeholders and healthcare settings on guideline-based OA management may promote implementation. Additional support on organising (e.g., scheduling clinical time), planning (e.g., securing appropriate space, marketing/training tools), and funding (e.g., accessing dedicated internal/external grants) may strengthen implementation across public settings., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Total knee replacement is a commonly adopted surgical intervention to reduce physical limitations and pain in advanced-stage knee osteoarthritis. However, these patients may experience physical dysfunction to limit their access during conventional rehabilitation after total knee replacement. The use of telemedicine may be the promising solution. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of telerehabilitation with conventional in-person rehabilitation in patients who underwent a total knee replacement., Methods: For this systematic review on randomized controlled trials, PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect and CINAHL databases were searched for eligible articles published between 1 January 2003 and 28 February 2022. The eligibility criteria were patients who underwent total knee replacement, randomized controlled trials and publications in English. The main outcome measures were focused on pain and physical function. Reference lists of relevant studies were also manually checked to find additional studies. Two independent reviewers conducted study selection separately. PEDro scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the included randomized controlled trials. A meta-analysis was performed on the collected data. Review Manager (RevMan, version 5.3) was used for all analyses., Results: A total of 11 studies met the eligibility criteria and included 1825 participants in the systematic review. Overall, the results revealed that the effectiveness of telerehabilitation is comparable to conventional in-person rehabilitation in improving various pain and functional outcomes in patients who underwent a total knee replacement. In the meta-analysis with the fixed-effects model, no significant difference was found in the improvement of pain and physical function in patients with knee osteoarthritis compared with conventional rehabilitation (Standardized Mean Difference (SMD)  -0.15, 95% CI  -0.47 to 0.16, P  = 0.34 and SMD -0.04, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.12, P  = 0.62, respectively). In addition, the utilization of hospital resources and costs were significantly lower in telerehabilitation when compared with in-person rehabilitation., Conclusion: Telerehabilitation was comparable to conventional in-person rehabilitation in improving clinical outcomes following total knee replacement. However, it might be a more preferable alternative rehabilitation intervention for patients following total knee replacement given the significantly lower cost of telerehabilitation., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.