Search

Olga N Tkacheva,1 Nadezda K Runikhina,1 Valentina S Ostapenko,1 Natalia V Sharashkina,1 Elen A Mkhitaryan,1,2 Julia S Onuchina,1 Sergei N Lysenkov,1,3 Nikolai N Yakhno,2 Yan Press4–6 1Pirogov Russian National Medical University, The Russian Clinical Research Center for Gerontology, Moscow, Russia; 2Neurology Department, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; 3Department of Evolution, Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia; 4Department of Family Medicine, Siaal Research Center for Family Medicine and Primary Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel; 5Yasski Clinic, Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Unit, Clalit Health Services, Beer-Sheva, Israel; 6Unit for Community Geriatrics, Division of Health in the Community, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel Background: Geriatric syndromes (GSs) are common in older adults and have a significant effect on their quality of life, disability, and use of health care resources. Few studies have assessed the prevalence of GSs in Russia. The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of GSs among older adults living in the community in Moscow. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in four community clinics in Moscow. A total of 1,220 patients completed a screening questionnaire, and 356 of them also underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Results: The mean age of the 1,220 participants was 74.9±6.1 years; 75.5% were women. Based on the questionnaire, 58.3% reported visual or hearing impairment, 58.2% cognitive impairment, 46% mood disorder, 42% difficulty walking, 28.3% urinary incontinence, 21.3% traumatic falls (over the previous year), and 12.2% weight loss. The mean number of GSs per patient was 2.9±1.5. Based on CGA, a decline in Instrumental Activity of Daily Living score was identified in 34.8% of the patients, a risk of malnutrition (Mini-Nutritional Assessment score, 17–23.5) in 25.8%, probable cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination score 5) in 36.2%. On the whole, patients demonstrated good mobility (average walking speed, 1±0.2 m/s) and hand grip strength (23.9±6.4 kg in women and 39.1±8.3 kg in men), but poor balance (only 39.4% were able to maintain their balance on one leg for 10 s or more). Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate a high prevalence of GSs among community-dwelling people aged 65 years and older in Moscow. The results provide a better understanding of the needs of older adults in Russia and can facilitate planning for medical and social assistance for this population. Keywords: geriatric syndromes, comprehensive geriatric assessment, questionnaire, community-dwelling, Russia

Olga N Tkacheva,1 Nadezda K Runikhina,1 Arkadiy L Vertkin,2 Irina V Voronina,1 Natalia V Sharashkina,1 Elen A Mkhitaryan,1 Valentina S Ostapenko,1 Elena A Prokhorovich,2 Tamar Freud,3 Yan Press3–5 1Russian Gerontology Clinical Research Center, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 2Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry named after AI Evdokimov, Moscow, Russia; 3Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sial Family Medicine and Primary Care Research Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, 4Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Unit, Clalit Health Care Services, Yassky Clinic, 5Community-Based Geriatric Unit, Division of Community Health, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel Background: Delirium, a common problem among hospitalized elderly patients, is not usually diagnosed by doctors for various reasons. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a short training course on the identification of delirium and the diagnostic rate of delirium among hospitalized patients aged ≥65 years. The secondary aim was to identify the risk factors for delirium. Methods: A prospective study was conducted in an acute-care hospital in Moscow, Russia. Six doctors underwent a short training course on delirium. Data collected included assessment by the confusion assessment method for the intensive care units, sociodemographic data, functional state before hospitalization, comorbidity, and hospitalization indices (indication for hospitalization, stay in intensive care unit, results of laboratory tests, length of hospitalization, and in-hospital mortality). Results: Delirium was diagnosed in 13 of 181 patients (7.2%) who underwent assessment. Cognitive impairment was diagnosed more among patients with delirium (30.0% vs 6.1%, P=0.029); Charlson comorbidity index was higher (3.6±2.4 vs 2.3±1.8, P=0.013); and Barthel index was lower (43.5±34.5 vs 94.1±17.0, P=0.000). The length of hospitalization was longer for patients with delirium at 13.9±7.3 vs 8.8±4.6 days (P=0.0001), and two of the 13 patients with delirium died during hospitalization compared with none of the 168 patients without delirium (P=0.0001). Conclusion: Although the rate of delirium was relatively low compared with studies from the West, this study proves that an educational intervention among doctors can bring about a significant change in the diagnosis of the condition. Keywords: delirium, elderly, inpatients, Russia

Dementia is one of the main challenges to modern society. According to estimated data, as of 2019, there were 1.949.811 people living In Russia with dementia of various etiology. At the same time, there have been no large epidemiological studies of dementia in the Russian Federation. The article provides an overview of the available data on the epidemiology of cognitive impairment (CI) In Russia given from various sources. Not only estimated, but also available clinical data were analyzed. In general, the obtained prevalence values for CI are comparable to global values. Thus, in an epidemiological study of people over 60 years of age in a separate district of Moscow, the prevalence of dementia was 10.4%, Alzheimer's disease 4.5%. A study of outpatients aged 60 years and older showed a high prevalence of both dementia and non-dementia CI at general medical appointments (incidence of dementia 7.8%, MCI 49.6%). It has been shown that the problem of non-dementia CI is already relevant in people of pre-retirement age (the prevalence of non-dementia CI in patients 55-64 years old is 36.8-44.8%). Unique data obtained in a population of institutionalized centenarians (prevalence of dementia 69%), as well as data on the relationship of CI with both somatic and demographic factors are presented.

Aim: To study the real-world efficacy and safety of netakimab in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA)., Materials and Methods: The retrospective analysis included 23 patients (13 males; 56.5%) aged 23 to 73 years (median 42, interquartile range 28 to 52 years) with AS ( n =12) or PsA ( n =11) who received netakimab therapy from February 2021 to April 2023. Disease activity was assessed every 3-6 months based on the C-reactive protein (CRP) level for all patients according to the BASDAI and ASDAS-CRP indices for AS, DAPSA and PASI for PsA. These indicators were analyzed before therapy and at the last visit to assess the effectiveness of treatment. The results are presented as median (interquartile range)., Results: In all patients treated with netakimab (median duration of treatment 11 months), the CRP level decreased from 10.6 (3.1; 17.3) to 3.1 (1.9; 8.9) mg/L (absolute difference -7.5 mg/L, median relative reduction -60%; p =0.008), and the proportion of patients with elevated CRP decreased from 70 to 41%; p =0.039. In patients with AS (median duration of treatment 9 months), BASDAI score decreased from 5.8 (4.7; 6.5) to 3.0 (1.9; 3.8) points (absolute difference -2.8 points, median relative reduction of -45%; p =0.008) and ASDAS-CRP score decreased from 2.8 (1.9; 3.9) to 1.9 (1.7; 2.6) points (absolute difference -0.9 points, median relative reduction -21%; p =0.007). The proportion of patients with high AS activity (BASDAI≥4) decreased from 90% to 20% ( p =0.031); however, there was no significant change in the CRP level (absolute difference -4.9 mg/L, median relative reduction -57%; p =0.110). In patients with PsA (median duration of treatment 18 months), the CRP level decreased from 12.0 (4.5; 17.3) to 3.3 (2.0; 7.8) mg/L (absolute difference -8.7 mg/L, median relative reduction -80%; p =0.041), the DAPSA score decreased from 23.0 (19.0; 30.5) to 6.3 (5.2; 13.5) points (absolute difference -16.7 points, median relative reduction -69%; p =0.018). Three (13%) patients reported mild to moderate adverse events., Conclusion: The obtained data confirm the effectiveness and safety of netakimab in treating AS and PsA in real-world practice.

Senile asthenia syndrome (SAS) is a geriatric syndrome characterized by age-associated decline of the physiological reserve and function in multiple systems, which results in higher vulnerability to effects of endo- and exogenous factors and a high risk of unfavorable outcomes, loss of self-sufficiency, and death. Generally, SAS is observed in elderly patients with comorbidities. In cardiovascular diseases, SAS is associated with a poor prognosis, including a higher incidence of exacerbation and death both during acute events and in chronic disease. However, SAS is often not taken into account in developing diagnostic and therapeutic programs for managing elderly patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD). This article analyzes available scientific information about SAS, algorithms for SAS diagnosis, and the scales that may be useful in developing individual plans for management of elderly patients with CVD.

To determine the prognostic value of frailty and comorbidity for outdoor mobility loss and mortality in the elderly. The retrospective study was conducted among outpatients aged ≥60 years. Patients with ≥3 chronic illnesses were treated by doctors who had undergone a 72-hour geriatric training. The outdoor low-mobility group comprised patients who failed to visit a doctor because of decreased outdoor mobility during the 3-year follow-up period. The outdoor high-mobility group comprised participants with no outdoor mobility loss. 5678 patients with a mean age of 71.0 ± 0.1 years were included in the study. The risk of outdoor mobility loss rose by 4% per year with men developing it 30% more than women. The effect of frailty was of particular importance because it increased the risk of developing outdoor mobility loss by 70%. Comorbidity was not associated with a higher risk of outdoor mobility loss, but the investigators did not take into account all possible illnesses, or the severity of disease. The loss of outdoor mobility was associated with increase in mortality. Early detection of frailty can help predict outdoor mobility loss and could reduce mortality among older people.

In recent years, more and more works have appeared that with age, classic risk factors that negatively affect the prognosis (cardiovascular diseases) lose their influence on life expectancy. The study aimed to assess the influence of cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors and structural and functional characteristics of the heart on three-year survival in people 95 years and older. The study involved 69 patients 95 years and older (98±1,9 years), 61 (88,4%) were women. After 36 months, data were obtained on the participants' status of life: 25 (36,2%) were alive, and 44 (63,8%) died. Based on the regression analysis results, it was determined that risk factors and history of cardiovascular diseases were not associated with 3-year survival. With a 3-year follow-up, the risk of death increases three times with a decrease in diastolic blood pressure less than 75 mm/Hg, 7,8 times with a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction below 62%, and 4,9 times with an increase in the end-diastolic size of the right ventricle by more than 2,9 cm.

Primary prevention of cardiovascular events is based on achievement of optimal control of risk factors - arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, glycemia - in accordance with current recommendations of scientific societies. But most rapidly growing segment of population - elderly and old individuals - have been underrepresented in randomized clinical trials underlying recommendations on primary and secondary prevention. That is why it is problematic to directly apply recommendations to patients from this group of population. In addition, old patients are characterized by accumulation of functional deficits, development of syndrome of senile asthenia ("frailty"), and multimorbidity. Effect of these characteristics on prognosis often exceeds that of risk factors. Other important factor is high susceptibility of old patients to risk of development of unfavorable effects because of both changes of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs and the need for multiple medicines (polypragmasy). While applying existing recommendations to old people one should recognize limitations of current knowledge on best ways of realization of approaches to prevention of cardiovascular prevention which effectiveness has been proved in younger individuals. Improvement of awareness and development of special skills of physicians involved in management of old patients is required for timely detection of the syndrome of senile asthenia. Special geriatric approaches should be implemented in cooperation with specialists in geriatric medicine.

For screening frailty in daily practice, we developed the questionnaire relating issues of weight loss, impaired vision and hearing, injuries related to falls, mood decline, cognitive impairment, urinary incontinence, and mobility difficulties. 356 outpatients from Moscow were included in the study (mean age 74,9±6,1 years, women - 80,4 %). Patients were interviewed using the questionnaire and underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment. The phenotype model of frailty was determined by L. Fried criteria, the frailty index model - by K. Rockwood criteria. ROC-analysis demonstrated a satisfactory agreement between the result of the survey by the questionnaire and assessment the phenotype model of frailty and the frailty index model (AUC=0,765 and 0,731, respectively). The results statistically significantly correlated with the assessment of the phenotype model of frailty and the frailty index model (Spearman correlation = 0,4 and 0,41, p<0,001). Optimal characteristics of the questionnaire for the frailty screening were consistent to cut-off ≥3 and ≥ 4 points. We propose to use a cut-off ≥ 3 point, since it corresponds to a higher value of sensitivity (85,7 and 93,3 % compared with the phenotype model of frailty and the frailty index model respectively). The proportion of patients who scored ≥ 3 points (58,4 %) indicates a high prevalence of geriatric syndromes among outpatients in Moscow.

Although geriatric syndromes are widespread, they often remain undiagnosed leading to the development of adverse outcomes. For the prompt detection of the most common geriatric syndromes in primary care we have created seven issues related to weight loss, vision and hearing impairments, falls, mood disorder, cognitive impairment, urinary incontinence, and the difficulties in walking. We believe that using of these questions will allow physicians to focus on addressing the important health problems associated with age and will produce the selection of patients for comprehensive geriatric assessment.

Purpose of the Study: The study of the characteristics and effectiveness of antihypertensive therapy (AHT) in patients aged 65 years and older., Material and Methods: The study included 356 patients, mean age 74,9+/-6,1 years, 80.4% women. The prevalence of arterial hypertension (AH) and the current intake of antihypertensive drugs were evaluated by self-reported patient., Results: The prevalence of hypertension was 88.5%. The predominant variant was isolated systolic hypertension. 51.1% of patients have systolic blood pressure as measured at the reception turned >140 mm Hg in 34.7% of patients >150 mm Hg AHT received 91.6% of patients with hypertension in 65.6% of cases it was combined. Of the various combinations of bicomponent most patients took angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor in combination with a -adrenoblocker or a diuretic., Conclusions: The study showed the high prevalence of hypertension and the lack of efficacy in patients AHT elderly seeking outpatient care.

The article gives a brief description of the frailty syndrome and comprehensive geriatric assessment. We describe two classical models - a model of the phenotype and the index of the frailty. The basic questionnaires for frailty syndrome screening in outpatient practice, as well as research on the validation of these questionnaires are presented. The results of comparative studies of questionnaires for frailty screening are shown.