Search

Background Acute endovascular revascularization for isolated internal carotid occlusion without tandem intracranial occlusion has been proposed to prevent early neurologic deterioration (END) and improve outcome, but has not been shown to be more effective than medical therapy. We aimed to evaluate prognosis with initial medical therapy alone, and also performed a systematic review to put these results in a broader context. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted over a 2‐year period with acute stroke/transient ischemic attack due to isolated internal carotid artery occlusion. Subjects with tandem intracranial occlusion or Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) ≤5 were excluded. The primary outcome was END within 48 hours (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] increase ≥4 persisting for ≥24 hours). Secondary outcomes included discharge NIHSS and disposition. We also performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis of published studies along with the data from our cohort. Results Twenty‐three patients met our inclusion criteria. Median age was 69 years, initial Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score 10, and NIHSS score 3. END attributed to recurrent ischemia occurred in 5/23 patients (22%, 95% CI: 7%–44%). At discharge, 78% had a favorable outcome with a median NIHSS of 2 (interquartile range 1–3). END appeared more frequent in those with higher baseline NIHSS. In our systematic review, 7 prior studies met our inclusion criteria. END occurred in 17% (95% CI: 12%–23%) of patients, 18% with medical therapy versus 13% with endovascular therapy, with substantial heterogeneity among studies. Conclusion In patients with acute stroke or transient ischemic attack due to isolated internal carotid occlusion, END is relatively common (occurring in about 1 out of 6 patients). Further research is needed to evaluate the roles of maximal medical management or acute endovascular thrombectomy in these patients.

Background and Purpose: Endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke has revolutionized clinical care for stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO), but treatment remains time sensitive. At our stroke center, up to half of the door-to-groin time is accounted for after the patient arrives in the neuro-interventional radiology (NIR) suite. Here we apply the concept of a highly visible timer in the NIR suite to quantify the impact on endovascular treatment time in stroke patients with LVO. Methods: This was a single-center prospective pseudo-randomized study conducted over a 32-week period (September 14, 2020 through April 25, 2021). Pseudo-randomization was achieved by turning the timer on and off in 2-week intervals. The primary outcome and secondary outcomes were reduction in IR to groin time and 90-day mRS, respectively. We also performed a stratified analysis based on anesthesia status for the procedure along with a multivariate regression to evaluate the effect of the intervention on treatment time while accounting for endotracheal intubation. Results: During the 32-week study period, 97 mechanical thrombectomies were performed. The timer was ON and OFF for 38 and 59 cases, respectively. The timer resulted in a reduction in IR-to-groin time (27.7 mins vs 32.6 mins; p=0.02). Endotracheal intubation (80% of overall cohort) was associated with a longer NIR-to-groin time (33 mins vs 23 mins; p Conclusions: A highly visible timer in the NIR suite achieved a meaningful, albeit modest, reduction in endovascular treatment time for stroke patients with LVO. A larger study would be necessary to measure a potential impact on long-term functional outcome, and a multi-center study may be necessary to confirm generalizability. However, based on these results, the lack of risk, and low cost, it is reasonable for stroke centers to consider using a highly visible timer in the NIR suite to improve stroke treatment times.

Backgroundand Purpose: Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare cause of stroke carrying a nearly 4% risk of recurrence after 1 year. There is limited data on predictors of recurrent venous thrombosis in patients with CVT. In this study, we aim to identify those predictors.Methods:This is a secondary analysis of the ACTION-CVT study which is a multi-center international study of consecutive patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of CVT over a 6-year period. Patients with cancer associated CVT, CVT during pregnancy, or CVT in the setting of known antiphospholipid antibody syndrome were excluded per the ACTION-CVT protocol. The study outcome was recurrent venous thrombosis defined as recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) or de-novo CVT. We compared characteristics between patients with vs. without recurrent venous thrombosis during follow-up and performed adjusted Cox regression analyses to determine important predictors of recurrent venous thrombosis.Results:947 patients were included with a mean age was 45.2 years, 63.9% were women, and 83.6% had at least 3-months of follow-up. During a median follow-up of 308 (IQR 120-700) days, there were 5.05 recurrent venous thromboses (37 VTE and 24 de-novo CVT) per 100 patient-years. Predictors of recurrent venous thrombosis were Black race (adjusted HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.14-3.98, p = 0.018), prior history of VTE (aHR 3.40, 95% CI 1.80-6.42, p < 0.001) and the presence of one or more positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aHR 3.85, 95% CI 1.97-7.50, p < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses including events only occurring on oral anticoagulation yielded similar findings.Conclusion:Black race, history of VTE, and the presence of one or more antiphospholipid antibodies are associated with recurrent venous thrombosis among patients with CVT. Future studies are needed to validate our findings to better understand mechanisms and treatment strategies in patients with CVT.

Background: A small randomized controlled trial suggested that dabigatran may be as effective as warfarin in the treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). We aimed to compare direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to warfarin in a real-world CVT cohort. Methods: This multicenter international retrospective study (United States, Europe, New Zealand) included consecutive patients with CVT treated with oral anticoagulation from January 2015 to December 2020. We abstracted demographics and CVT risk factors, hypercoagulable labs, baseline imaging data, and clinical and radiological outcomes from medical records. We used adjusted inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox-regression models to compare recurrent cerebral or systemic venous thrombosis, death, and major hemorrhage in patients treated with warfarin versus DOACs. We performed adjusted inverse probability of treatment weighted logistic regression to compare recanalization rates on follow-up imaging across the 2 treatments groups. Results: Among 1025 CVT patients across 27 centers, 845 patients met our inclusion criteria. Mean age was 44.8 years, 64.7% were women; 33.0% received DOAC only, 51.8% received warfarin only, and 15.1% received both treatments at different times. During a median follow-up of 345 (interquartile range, 140–720) days, there were 5.68 recurrent venous thrombosis, 3.77 major hemorrhages, and 1.84 deaths per 100 patient-years. Among 525 patients who met recanalization analysis inclusion criteria, 36.6% had complete, 48.2% had partial, and 15.2% had no recanalization. When compared with warfarin, DOAC treatment was associated with similar risk of recurrent venous thrombosis (aHR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.51–1.73]; P =0.84), death (aHR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.22–2.76]; P =0.70), and rate of partial/complete recanalization (aOR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.48–1.73]; P =0.79), but a lower risk of major hemorrhage (aHR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.15–0.82]; P =0.02). Conclusions: In patients with CVT, treatment with DOACs was associated with similar clinical and radiographic outcomes and favorable safety profile when compared with warfarin treatment. Our findings need confirmation by large prospective or randomized studies.

Background and Purpose: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), compared to single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), lowers the risk of stroke or death early after TIA and minor ischemic stroke. Prior trials excluded moderate to severe strokes, due to a potential increased risk of bleeding. We aimed to compare in-hospital bleeding rates in SAPT and DAPT patients with moderate or severe stroke (defined by NIHSS ≥4).Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of ischemic stroke over a 2-year period with admission NIHSS ≥4. The primary outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) with any change in NIHSS. Secondary outcomes included systemic bleeding and major bleeding, a composite of serious systemic bleeding and symptomatic ICH. We performed analyses stratified by stroke severity (NIHSS 4–7 vs. 8+) and by preceding use of tPA and/or thrombectomy. Univariate followed by multivariate logistic regression evaluated whether DAPT was independently associated with bleeding.Results: Of 377 patients who met our inclusion criteria, 148 received DAPT (39%). Symptomatic ICH was less common with DAPT compared to SAPT (0.7 vs. 6.4%, p < 0.01), as was the composite of major bleeding (2.1 vs. 7.6%, p = 0.03). Symptomatic ICH was numerically less frequent in the DAPT group, but not statistically significant, when stratified by stroke severity (NIHSS 4–7: 0 vs. 5.9%, p = 0.06; NIHSS 8+: 1.5 vs. 6.6%, p = 0.18) and by treatment with tPA and/or thrombectomy (Yes: 2.6 vs. 9.1%, p = 0.30; No: 0 vs. 2.9%, p = 0.25). DAPT was not associated with major bleeding in either the univariate or the multivariate regression.Conclusions: In this single center cohort, symptomatic ICH and the composite of serious systemic bleeding and symptomatic ICH was rare in patients on DAPT. Relative to single antiplatelet therapy DAPT was not associated with an increased risk of in-hospital bleeding in patients with moderate and severe ischemic stroke.

Background: There has been no comprehensive longitudinal study of pulmonary functions (PFTS) in ALS determining which measure is most sensitive to declines in respiratory muscle strength. Objective: To determine the longitudinal decline of PFTS in ALS and which measure supports Medicare criteria for NIV initiation first. Methods: Serial PFTs (maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV), maximum inspiratory pressure measured by mouth (MIP) or nasal sniff pressure (SNIP), maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), and Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)) were performed over 12 months on 73 ALS subjects to determine which measure showed the sentinel decline in pulmonary function. The rate of decline for each measure was determined as the median slope of the decrease over time. Medicare-based NIV initiation criteria were met if %FVC was ≤ 50% predicted or MIP was ≤ 60 cMH2O. Results: 65 subjects with at least 3 visits were included for analyses. All median slopes were significantly different than zero. MEP and sitting FVC demonstrated the largest rate of decline. Seventy subjects were analyzed for NIV initiation criteria, 69 met MIP criteria first; 11 FVC and MIP criteria simultaneously and none FVC criteria first. Conclusions: MEP demonstrated a steeper decline compared to other measures suggesting expiratory muscle strength declines earliest and faster and the use of airway clearance interventions should be initiated early. When Medicare criteria for NIV initiation are considered, MIP criteria are met earliest. These results suggest that pressure-based measurements are important in assessing the timing of NIV and the use of pulmonary clearance interventions.

Introduction: Cerebrovascular disease is the leading cause of seizures and incident epilepsy of known etiology in older adults. As prophylactic use of antiepileptic drugs remains controversial, statins have garnered attention as an alternate preventive strategy due to pleiotropic effects, beyond lipid-lowering, which may include neuroprotective and anti-epileptogenic properties. Our objective was to assess the current evidence on statin use for prevention of post-stroke seizure and post-stroke epilepsy (PSE). Methods: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. Pubmed and Embase were searched from database inception to May 2019 for English-language, full-text experimental, observational analytic, or systematic reviews/meta-analytic studies examining the association between statin use in adults and development of early-onset seizures (ES; seizures ≤7 days after stroke) or PSE. Pooled analyses were based on random-effects models using the inverse-variance method. Results: Of 157 citations, 154 were excluded due to duplication or ineligibility, yielding 3 cohort studies from East Asia. Two studies reported on outcomes of ischemic stroke and 1 on hemorrhagic stroke. Only 1 study reported on ES, finding a significantly reduced risk following post-stroke statin use (OR 0.35, CI 0.20-0.60). Two studies reported on pre-stroke statin use, with findings demonstrating a lack of association with PSE (pooled OR 1.17, CI 0.93-1.48; Figure 1.1). However, post-stroke statin use was associated with less PSE (pooled OR 0.61, CI 0.50-0.74), without evidence of heterogeneity (Figure 1.2). Conclusions: Systematic review and meta-analysis of 3 high-quality cohort studies suggests post-stroke, but not pre-stroke, statin use may be associated with reduced risk of PSE. Further research is warranted to verify if these findings are replicable in other populations, as well as to explore the influence of timing and duration of statin use on outcomes.

Objectives Cerebrovascular disease is the leading cause of seizures and incident epilepsy of known etiology in older adults. Statins have increasingly garnered attention as a potential preventive strategy due to their pleiotropic effects beyond lipid-lowering, which may include neuroprotective and anti-epileptogenic properties. We aim to assess the evidence on statin use for prevention of post-stroke early-onset seizures and post-stroke epilepsy. Materials and methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, which was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019144916). PubMed and Embase were searched from database inception to 05/2020 for English-language, full-text studies examining the association between statin use in adults and development of early-onset seizures (≤7 days post-stroke) or post-stroke epilepsy. Pooled analyses were based on random-effects models using the inverse-variance method. Results Of 182 citations identified, 175 were excluded due to duplication or ineligibility. The 7 eligible publications were all cohort studies from East Asia or South America, with a total of 53,579 patients. Pre-stroke statin use was not associated with post-stroke epilepsy (3 studies pooled: OR 1.14, CI 0.91-1.42). However, post-stroke statin use was associated with lower risk of both early-onset seizures (3 studies pooled: OR 0.36, CI 0.25-0.53), and post-stroke epilepsy (6 studies pooled: OR 0.64, CI 0.46-0.88). Conclusions Review of 7 cohort studies suggested post-stroke, but not pre-stroke, statin use may be associated with reduced risk of early-onset seizures and post-stroke epilepsy. Further research is warranted to validate these findings in broader populations and better parse the temporal components of the associations.