1. Novel Video-Laryngoscope with Wireless Image Transmission via Wi-Fi towards a Smartphone
- Author
-
Hugo Barragán-Villegas, Gabriela Josefina Vidaña-Martínez, Bersain A. Reyes, Mauricio Guerra-Hernández, José Enrique Calacuayo-Rojas, Ma. del Pilar Fonseca-Leal, Jorge Alberto Castañón-González, Oscar Fernando Núñez-Olvera, and José Sergio Camacho-Juárez
- Subjects
Computer Networks and Communications ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Video laryngoscope ,lcsh:TK7800-8360 ,Endotracheal intubation ,video-laryngoscope ,smartphone ,In vivo tests ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,030202 anesthesiology ,Medicine ,In vitro study ,Intubation ,Electrical and Electronic Engineering ,Wi-Fi ,endotracheal intubation ,Capnography ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,lcsh:Electronics ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,Wireless image transmission ,wireless ,Hardware and Architecture ,Control and Systems Engineering ,Anesthesia ,Signal Processing ,business ,Airway - Abstract
A low-cost video laryngoscope (VDL) called Hybrid 1.0 was developed using smart devices for visualization. To test its performance, we compared it with a high-end VDL device, using both in vitro and in vivo studies. During the in vitro study, medical students without experience in airway intubation were randomly asked to intubate a mannequin with different degrees of difficulty (Cormack&ndash, Lehane scales) by using either the Hybrid 1.0 VDL (GI) or a conventional laryngoscope (GII). During the in vivo study, N = 60 endotracheal intubations were performed by resident and base physicians, divided into two groups, the first group intubated with the Hybrid 1.0 VDL (GI) while the second group used a VDL C-Mac shovel (GII). As performance indexes, both studies reported the number of successful intubations (correct capnography signal) and intubation time. For the in vitro testing, no statistically significant differences were found regarding the number of successful intubations, while statistically significant differences were found regarding the intubation times. During the in vivo tests, procedures were performed by residents and by base physicians, and no statistically significant differences were found. The provided results point out that the VDL proposed can be clinically useful and offers technical characteristics similar to other VDLs that currently exist on the market.
- Published
- 2020