Search

Background: The aim of this study was to determine if rotational uncertainties in gynecological cancer patients can be reduced using surface imaging (SI) compared to aligning three markers on the patient's skin with in-room lasers (marker-laser)., Materials and Methods: Fifty gynecological cancer patients treated with external-beam radiotherapy were retrospectively analyzed; 25 patients were positioned with marker-laser and 25 patients were positioned with SI. The values of rotational (pitch and roll) deviations of the patient positions between the treatment-planning computed tomography (CT) and online cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) were collected for both subcohorts and all treatment fractions after performing automatic registration between the two image sets. Statistical analysis of the difference between the two set-up methods was performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test., Results: The median pitch deviation were 1.5° [interquartile range (IQR): 0.6°-2.6°] and 1.1° (IQR: 0.5°-1.9°) for the marker-laser and SI methods, respectively (p < 0.01). The median roll deviation was 0.5° (IQR: 0.2°-0.9°), and 0.7° (IQR: 0.3°-1.2°) for the marker-laser and SI methods, respectively (p < 0.01). Given the shape of the target, pitch deviations had a greater impact on the uncertainty at the periphery of the target and were considered more relevant., Conclusion: By introducing SI as a set-up method in gynecological cancer patients, higher positioning accuracy could be achieved compared with the marker-laser set-up method. This was demonstrated based on residual deviations rather than deviations corrected for by image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT)., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: Authirs declare no conflict of interests., (© 2023 Greater Poland Cancer Centre.)

Purpose: Stereotactic body radiation therapy for tumors near the central airways implies high-grade toxic effects, as concluded from the HILUS trial. However, the small sample size and relatively few events limited the statistical power of the study. We therefore pooled data from the prospective HILUS trial with retrospective data from patients in the Nordic countries treated outside the prospective study to evaluate toxicity and risk factors for high-grade toxic effects., Methods and Materials: All patients were treated with 56 Gy in 8 fractions. Tumors within 2 cm of the trachea, the mainstem bronchi, the intermediate bronchus, or the lobar bronchi were included. The primary endpoint was toxicity, and the secondary endpoints were local control and overall survival. Clinical and dosimetric risk factors were analyzed for treatment-related fatal toxicity in univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses., Results: Of 230 patients evaluated, grade 5 toxicity developed in 30 patients (13%), of whom 20 patients had fatal bronchopulmonary bleeding. The multivariable analysis revealed tumor compression of the tracheobronchial tree and maximum dose to the mainstem or intermediate bronchus as significant risk factors for grade 5 bleeding and grade 5 toxicity. The 3-year local control and overall survival rates were 84% (95% CI, 80%-90%) and 40% (95% CI, 34%-47%), respectively., Conclusions: Tumor compression of the tracheobronchial tree and high maximum dose to the mainstem or intermediate bronchus increase the risk of fatal toxicity after stereotactic body radiation therapy in 8 fractions for central lung tumors. Similar dose constraints should be applied to the intermediate bronchus as to the mainstem bronchi., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Voxel-based analysis (VBA) allows the full, 3-dimensional, dose distribution to be considered in radiotherapy outcome analysis. This provides new insights into anatomical variability of pathophysiology and radiosensitivity by removing the need for a priori definition of organs assumed to drive the dose response associated with patient outcomes. This approach may offer powerful biological insights demonstrating the heterogeneity of the radiobiology across tissues and potential associations of the radiotherapy dose with further factors. As this methodological approach becomes established, consideration needs to be given to translating VBA results to clinical implementation for patient benefit. Here, we present a comprehensive roadmap for VBA clinical translation. Technical validation needs to demonstrate robustness to methodology, where clinical validation must show generalisability to external datasets and link to a plausible pathophysiological hypothesis. Finally, clinical utility requires demonstration of potential benefit for patients in order for successful translation to be feasible. For each step on the roadmap, key considerations are discussed and recommendations provided for best practice., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Previous studies on dose-escalated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer have shown mixed results, and it is not established which patients would benefit from dose escalation. Further, while dose escalation does not appear to increase late toxicity, this needs to be confirmed with longer follow-up. In this study, we analysed treatment outcome and toxicity in 215 patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated with dose-escalated radiotherapy (>72 Gy, EQD2, α/β = 10 Gy, boost by brachytherapy or simultaneous integrated boost) and a matched cohort of 215 patients treated with standard dose external-beam radiotherapy (68 Gy) between 2011 and 2018 at our institution. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 77.8% (72.4-83.6) and 73.7% (67.8-80.1) in the dose-escalated and standard dose group, respectively ( p = 0.24). Median follow-up was 78.1 (49.2-98.4) and 60.2 (38.9-89.4) months in the dose-escalated and standard dose groups, respectively. Grade ≥3 osteoradionecrosis (ORN) and late dysphagia were more common in the dose-escalated group compared to the standard dose group, with 19 (8.8%) vs. 4 (1.9%) patients developing grade ≥3 ORN ( p = 0.001), and 39 (18.1%) vs. 21 (9.8%) patients developing grade ≥3 dysphagia ( p = 0.01). No predictive factors to help select patients for dose-escalated radiotherapy were found. However, the remarkably good OS in the dose-escalated cohort, despite a predominance of advanced tumour stages, encourages further attempts to identify such factors.

Background: Local recurrence is the most common pattern of failure in head and neck cancer. It can therefore be hypothesised that some of these patients would benefit from an intensified local treatment, such as radiation dose escalation of the primary tumour. This study compares treatment and toxicity outcomes from two different boost modalities in oropharyngeal cancer: simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) and brachytherapy boost., Methods: Two hundred and forty-four consecutive patients treated with > 72 Gy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma between 2011 and 2018 at our institution were retrospectively analysed. Data on side effects were collected from a local quality registry and supplemented with a review of medical records. Patients receiving a brachytherapy boost first had external beam radiotherapy consisting of 68 Gy in 2 Gy fractions to the gross tumour volume (GTV), and elective radiotherapy to the neck bilaterally. The brachytherapy boost was typically given using pulsed dose rate, 15 fractions and 0.56-0.66 Gy per fraction [total dose in EQD2 = 75.4-76.8 Gy (α/β = 10)]. The typical dose escalated radiotherapy with external beam radiotherapy only, was delivered using SIB with 74,8 Gy in 2.2 Gy fractions [EQD2 = 76.0 Gy (α/β = 10)] to the primary tumour, 68 Gy in 2 Gy fractions to GTV + 10 mm margin and elective radiotherapy to the neck bilaterally., Results: Dose escalation by SIB was given to 111 patients and brachytherapy boost to 134 patients. The most common type of cancer was base of tongue (55%), followed by tonsillar cancer (42%). The majority of patients had T3- or T4-tumours and 84% were HPV-positive. The 5-year OS was 72,4% (95% CI 66.9-78.3) and the median follow-up was 6.1 years. Comparing the two different dose escalation modalities we found no significant differences in OS or PFS and these results remained after a propensity-score matched analysis was performed. The analysis of grade ≥ 3 side effects showed no significant differences between the two different dose escalation techniques., Conclusions: We found no significant differences in survival or grade ≥ 3 side effects comparing simultaneous integrated boost and brachytherapy boost as alternative dose escalation modalities in the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Complications after esophagectomy are common and the possible increase in postoperative complications associated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is of concern. The aim of our study was to analyze if the addition of radiotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases the incidence and severity of postoperative complications, including evaluation of the relation between radiation doses to the heart and lungs and postoperative complications., Methods: The study was based on an institutional surgical database for esophageal cancer. The study period was October 2008 to March 2020. Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were compared to patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and dose/volume parameters for the lungs and heart considered. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative complications., Results: During the study period, 274 patients underwent surgery for esophageal cancer, 93 patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 181 patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The median prescribed radiation dose to the planning target volume was 41.4 Gy, the median of the mean lung dose was 6.2 Gy, and the median of the mean heart dose was 20.3 Gy. The addition of radiotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not increase the incidence of postoperative complications. Neither were radiation doses to the lungs and heart associated with postoperative complications. Taxane-based chemotherapy regimens were however associated with an increased incidence of postoperative complications., Conclusions: In our cohort, the addition of neoadjuvant radiotherapy to chemotherapy was not associated with postoperative complications. However, taxane-based chemotherapy regimens, with or without concomitant radiotherapy, were associated with postoperative complications., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Aim: To evaluate Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and identify the benefit of the treatment by using a predictive algorithm., Methods: 85 patients treated with SBRT for mCRC were retrospectively analyzed. The CLInical Categorical Algorithm (CLICAL©) was used to predict probability of relapse after SBRT. Variables pre-SBRT were tested for significance for time to relapse (TTR). The patients' CLICAL© score was the mean of sub-scores of each significant variable's effect on the endpoint. Patients with similar scores were grouped into four signatures dependent on level of benefit after SBRT., Results: Median age was 69 years (42-88), 63 % had a performance status 0 and 47 % were treated for a single metastasis. At the time of the analysis, 90 % had relapsed (95 % out-of-field). Median TTR was 7.3 months (4.6-8.5), and the 2-year relapse-free rate was 15 % (95 %CI = 7-22). The CLICAL© signature III-IV predicted a low risk of relapse if receiving high dose SBRT to all metastases or to lung metastases only. Signature I-II had a short TTR, why SBRT for these patients was judged non-beneficial., Conclusion: The benefit from SBRT varies among mCRC patients. CLICAL© may serve as a screening tool for SBRT referrals but needs to be validated., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2022 The Authors.)

The bronchial tolerance to high doses of radiation is not fully understood. However, in the event of a radiological accident with unintended exposure of the central airways to high doses of radiation it would be important to be able to anticipate the clinical consequences given the magnitude of the absorbed dose to different parts of the bronchial tree. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a radiation treatment technique involving a few large fractions of photon external-beam radiation delivered to a well-defined target in the body. Despite generally favourable results, with high local tumour control and low-toxicity profile, its utility for tumours located close to central thoracic structures has been questioned, considering reports of severe toxic symptoms such as haemoptysis (bleedings from the airways), bronchial necrosis, bronchial stenosis, fistulas and pneumonitis. In conjunction with patient- and tumour-related risk factors, recent studies have analysed the absorbed radiation dose to different thoracic structures of normal tissue to better understand their tolerance to these high doses per fraction. Although the specific mechanisms behind the toxicity are still partly unknown, dose to the proximal bronchial tree has been shown to correlate with high-grade radiation side effects. Still, there is no clear consensus on the tolerance dose of the different bronchial structures. Recent data indicate that a too high dose to a main bronchus may result in more severe clinical side effects as compared to a smaller sized bronchus. This review analyses the current knowledge on the clinical consequences of bronchial exposure to high dose hypofractionated radiation delivered with the SBRT technique, and the tolerance doses of the bronchi. It presents the current literature regarding types of high-grade clinical side effects, data on dose response and comments on other risk factors for high-grade toxic effects., (Creative Commons Attribution license.)

Re-irradiation in head and neck cancer is challenging, and cumulative dose constraints and dose/volume data are scarce. In this study, we present dose/volume data for patients re-irradiated for head and neck cancer and explore the correlations of cumulative dose to organs at risk and severe side effects. We analyzed 54 patients re-irradiated for head and neck cancer between 2011 and 2017. Organs at risk were delineated and dose/volume data were collected from cumulative treatment plans of all included patients. Receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) analysis assessed the association between dose/volume parameters and the risk of toxicity. The ROC-curve for a logistic model of carotid blowout vs. maximum doses to the carotid arteries showed AUC = 0.92 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.00) and a cut-off value of 119 Gy (sensitivity 1.00/specificity 0.89). The near-maximum dose to bones showed an association with the risk of osteoradionecrosis: AUC = 0.74 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.95) and a cut-off value of 119 Gy (sensitivity 1.00/specificity 0.52). Our analysis showed an association between cumulative dose to organs at risk and the risk of developing osteoradionecrosis and carotid blowout, and our results support the existing dose constraint for the carotid arteries of 120 Gy. The confirmation of these dose-response relationships will contribute to further improvements of re-irradiation strategies.

Background and Purpose: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for tumours ≥5 cm is poorly studied and its utility and feasibility is uncertain. We here report the Karolinska experience of SBRT in this setting., Material and Methods: All patients had a gross tumour volume (GTV) ≥70 cc, a prescribed physical dose of at least 40 Gy and received treatment between 1995-2012., Results: We included 164 patients with 175 tumours located in the thorax ( n  = 86), the liver ( n  = 27) and the abdomen ( n  = 62) and treated with a median prescribed dose (BED α/β 10Gy ) of 80 Gy (71.4-113). One- and 2- year local control rates were 82% and 61%. In multivariate analyses, minimum dose to the GTV and histological subtype were associated with local control. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) histology showed the most favourable local control - 94% at 2 years for all histologies. Thirty-seven patients experienced grade 3-5 toxicity most likely related to SBRT. Seven of the ten patients with grade 5 toxicity, had a centrally located tumour in the thorax., Conclusion: SBRT of tumours >5 cm in diameter may be an option for peripherally located lung and abdominal tumours. Histological origin and tumour location should be considered before treatment.

Aim: Data from a local quality registry are used to model the risk of late xerostomia after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC), based on dosimetric- and clinical variables. Strengths and weaknesses of using quality registry data are explored., Methods: HNC patients treated with radiotherapy at the Karolinska University hospital are entered into a quality registry at routine follow up, recording morbidity according to a modified RTOG/LENT-SOMA scale. Other recorded parameters are performance status, age, gender, tumor location, tumor stage, smoking status, chemotherapy and radiotherapy data, including prescribed dose and organ-at-risk (OAR) dose. Most patients are entered at several time points, but at variable times after treatment. Xerostomia was modeled based on follow-up data from January 2014 to October 2018, resulting in 753 patients. Two endpoints were considered: maximum grade ≥2 (XER G≥2 ) or grade ≥3 (XER G≥3 ) late xerostomia. Univariate Cox regression was used to select variables for two multivariate models for each endpoint, one based on the mean dose to the total parotid volume (D tot ) and one based on the mean dose to the contralateral parotid (D contra ). Cox regression allows the estimation of the risk of xerostomia at different time points; models were presented visually as nomograms estimating the risk at 9, 12, and 24 months respectively., Results: The toxicity rates were 366/753 (49%) for XER G≥2 and 40/753 (5.3%) for XER G≥3 . The multivariate models included several variables for XER G≥2 , and dose, concomitant chemotherapy and age were included for XER G≥3 . Induction chemotherapy and an increased number of fractions per week were associated with a lower risk of XER G≥2 . However, since the causality of these relationships have limited support from previous studies, alternative models without these variables were also presented. The models based on the mean dose to the total parotid volume and the contralateral parotid alone were very similar., Conclusion: Late xerostomia after radiotherapy can be modeled with reasonable predictive power based on registry data; models are presented for different endpoints highly relevant in clinical practice. However, the risk of modeling indirect relationships, given the unavoidably heterogeneous registry data, needs to be carefully considered in the interpretation of the results., (Copyright © 2020 Onjukka, Mercke, Björgvinsson, Embring, Berglund, Alexandersson von Döbeln, Friesland, Gagliardi, Lenneby Helleday, Sjödin and Lax.)

Purpose: For prostate cancer treatment, comparable or superior biochemical control was reported when using External-Beam-Radiotherapy (EBRT) with High-Dose-Rate-Brachytherapy (HDRB)-boost, compared to dose-escalation with EBRT alone. The conformal doses produced by HDRB could allow further beneficial prostate dose-escalation, but increase in dose is limited by normal tissue toxicity. Previous works showed correlation between urethral dose and incidence of urinary toxicity, but there is a lack of established guidelines on the dose constraints to this organ. This work aimed at fitting a Normal-Tissue-Complication-Probability model to urethral stricture data collected at one institution and validating it with an external cohort, looking at neo-adjuvant androgen deprivation as dose-modifying factor. Materials and Methods: Clinical and dosimetric data of 258 patients, with a toxicity rate of 12.8%, treated at a single institution with a variety of prescription doses, were collected to fit the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) model using the maximum likelihood method. Due to the different fractionations, doses were converted into 2 Gy-equivalent doses (α/β = 5 Gy), and urethral stricture was used as an end-point. For validation, an external cohort of 187 patients treated as part of the TROG (Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group) 03.04 RADAR trial with a toxicity rate of 8.7%, was used. The goodness of fit was assessed using calibration plots. The effect of neo-adjuvant androgen deprivation (AD) was analyzed separating patients who had received it prior to treatment from those who did not receive it. Results: The obtained LKB parameters were TD50 = 116.7 Gy and m = 0.23; n was fixed to 0.3, based on numerical optimization of the likelihood. The calibration plot showed a good agreement between the observed toxicity and the probability predicted by the model, confirmed by bootstrapping. For the external validation, the calibration plot showed that the observed toxicity obtained with the RADAR patients was well-represented by the fitted LKB model parameters. When patients were stratified by the use of AD TD50 decreased when AD was not present. Conclusions: Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model parameters were fitted to the risk of urethral stricture and externally validated with an independent cohort, to provide guidance on urethral tolerance doses for patients treated with a HDRB boost. For patients that did not receive AD, model fitting provided a lower TD50 suggesting a protective effect on urethra toxicity., (Copyright © 2020 Panettieri, Rancati, Onjukka, Ebert, Joseph, Denham, Steigler and Millar.)

Background: There is a lack of consensus concerning the definition of re-irradiation and re-irradiation volumes in head and neck cancer (HNC). The aim of the present study is to introduce a more strict definition of the re-irradiated volume that might better predict the risk of serious side-effects from treatment., Methods: Fifty-four consecutive patients re-irradiated for HNC cancer were retrospectively analysed. CT images were deformably registered and the dose distributions accumulated after conversion to EQD2. Patients with a cumulative dose of ≥100 Gy in the overlapping volume (V100) were included in the study. Survival data and radiation-related acute and late toxicities were recorded., Results: The overall survival of all included patients at 2 and 5 years was 42.6 and 27.3% respectively and the progression free survival at 2 and 5 years was 32.5 and 28.5% respectively. The overall rate of any event of severe (grade ≥ 3) acute and late toxicity was 26 and 51%, respectively. We found that severe acute toxicity was more common in patients who had a larger overlapping volume (V100 > mean) where 43% of the patients experienced grade ≥ 3 acute toxicity, compared to the patients with smaller overlapping volumes (V100 < mean) where only 11% had severe toxicity (p = 0.02). The seemingly high rates of late toxicity in the present study could be due to the use of a more strict definition of re-irradiation. In previous studies also patients with low dose overlap are included and our results imply that there is a risk that previous studies might have overestimated the risk-benefit ratio in re-irradiation of HNC., Conclusions: Our study describes the outcome of a patient material where a more strict definition of the re-irradiated volume is used. With this definition, which could better describe the volume of highest risk for serious complications, we found that larger such overlapping volumes result in an increase in severe acute side-effects. A clear definition of re-irradiation and re-irradiation volumes is of utmost importance for future studies of HNC to make results from different studies comparable.

Purpose: The aim of this work was to determine how the spatial pattern of dose in the ano-rectal wall is related to late gastro-intestinal toxicity for prostate cancer patients treated with mainly IMRT. Patients and methods: Patients from the DUE-01 multicentre study with patient-reported (prospective) follow-up and available dosimetric data were included. Conventionally fractionated patients received 74-80 Gy and hypofractionated patients received 65-75.2 Gy. A large majority of the patients were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Dose-surface maps (DSMs) for the anal canal and rectum as a single structure, and for the anal canal and the rectum separately, were co-registered rigidly in two dimensions and, for the patients with and without toxicity, respectively, the mean value of the dose in each pixel was calculated. A pixel-wise t -test was used to highlight the anatomical areas where there was a significant difference between the 'mean dose maps' of each group. Univariate models were also fitted to a range of spatial parameters. The endpoints considered were a mean grade ≥1 late fecal incontinence and a maximum grade ≥2 late rectal bleeding. Results: Twenty-six out of 213 patients had fecal incontinence, while 21/225 patients had rectal bleeding. Incontinence was associated with a higher dose in the caudal region of the anal canal; the most relevant spatial parameter was the lateral extent of the low and medium isodoses (5-49 Gy in EQD2). Bleeding was associated with high isodoses reaching the posterior rectal wall. The spatial dose parameters with the highest AUC value (.69) were the lateral extent of the 60-70 Gy isodoses. Conclusions: To avoid fecal incontinence it is important to limit the portion of the anal canal irradiated. Our analysis confirms that rectal bleeding is a function of similar spatial dose parameters for patients treated with IMRT, compared to previous studies on patients treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.

A fundamental problem in radiotherapy is the variation of organ at risk (OAR) volumes. Here we present our initial experience in engaging a large Radiation Oncology (RO) community to agree on national guidelines for OAR delineations. Our project builds on associated standardization initiatives and invites professionals from all radiotherapy departments nationwide. Presently, one guideline (rectum) has successfully been agreed on by a majority vote. Reaching out to all relevant parties in a timely manner and motivating funding agencies to support the work represented early challenges. Population-based data and a scalable methodological approach are major strengths of the proposed strategy., (© 2019 The Authors.)

Purpose : To evaluate the rate and dose response of brachial plexus toxicity post stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of apically situated lung lesions. Material/methods: We retrospectively identified all patients with apically located tumors, defined by the epicenter of the tumor being located superiorly to the aortic arch, and treated with SBRT between 2008 and 2013. Patients with a shorter follow-up than 6 months were excluded. Primary aim was to evaluate radiation-induced brachial plexopathy (RIBP). Dose to the plexus was assessed by a retrospective delineation of the brachial plexus on the CT used for treatment planning. Then, D max , D 0.1cc , D 1cc and D 3.0cc of the brachial plexus were collected from the dose-volume histograms (DVH) and recalculated to the biologically effective dose (BED) using α/β = 3 Gy. A normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model, based on four different dose-volume parameters (BED 3,max , BED 3,0.1cc, BED 3,1.0cc, BED 3,3.0cc ) was fitted to the data. Results: Fifty-two patients with 56 apically located tumors were identified. Median prescription dose per fraction was 15 Gy (range 6-17) and median number of fractions was 3 (3-10). With a median follow-up of 30 months (6.1-72) seven patients experienced maximum grade 2 (scored 3 times) or 3 (scored 4 times) RIBP after a median of 8.7 months (range 4.0-31). Three patients had combined symptoms with pain, sensory and motor affection and four patients had isolated pain. Median BED 3,max for the patients experiencing RIBP was 381 Gy (range 30-524) versus BED 3,max of 34 Gy (range 0.10-483) for the patients without RIBP. The NTCP models showed a very high predictive ability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.80-0.88). Conclusion: SBRT of apically located lung lesions may cause severe neurological symptoms; for a three-fraction treatment, we suggest that the maximum dose to the plexus should be kept ≤30 Gy (130 Gy BED 3 ).

Background and Purpose: Patients with breast cancer receiving mastectomy in our institution are offered immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). IBR may have an impact on the optimisation of radiation therapy (RT). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the clinical target volume (CTV) dose coverage when disregarding the dose received by the breast implant in women treated for breast cancer. Furthermore, to investigate the safety of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) with an implant (IBR+) in terms of recurrence and survival compared to patients without an implant (IBR-)., Patients and Methods: This matched-cohort included 128 patients with IBR+ and 252 IBR- patients (controls). The potential confounding effects of tumour stage and treatment were controlled for. For IBR+ patients, the implant volume was excluded from the CTV in the RT planning images, and the RT target coverage (V 95%: CTV covered by ≥the 95% isodose) was compared between the IBR+ and IBR- groups., Results: A limited under dosage was observed in patients without lymph-node irradiation; the V 95% mean values for the CTV subtracting the implant were 84% and 92%, for IBR+ and IBR- groups, respectively. Median follow-up duration was 5.8 years (0.1-7.5 years). In comparing IBR+ and IBR- groups, no statistically significant differences were found in the incidence of recurrence rate ratios or recurrence free survival (log-rank p = 0.142), overall survival (log-rank p = 0.096), or breast cancer specific survival (log-rank p = 0.147)., Conclusions: Post-mastectomy radiation therapy and implant-based reconstruction lead to minor under dosage of the target, due to the projection of the subcutaneous tissue in the presence of the implant. However, recurrence and survival rates were equally distributed among IBR+ and IBR- patients indicating that the overall treatment protocol used in our institution is safe., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To develop an infrastructure for structured and automated collection of interoperable radiation therapy (RT) data into a national clinical quality registry., Materials and Methods: The present study was initiated in 2012 with the participation of seven of the 15 hospital departments delivering RT in Sweden. A national RT nomenclature and a database for structured unified storage of RT data at each site (Medical Information Quality Archive, MIQA) have been developed. Aggregated data from the MIQA databases are sent to a national RT registry located on the same IT platform (INCA) as the national clinical cancer registries., Results: The suggested naming convention has to date been integrated into the clinical workflow at 12 of 15 sites, and MIQA is installed at six of these. Involvement of the remaining 3/15 RT departments is ongoing, and they are expected to be part of the infrastructure by 2016. RT data collection from ARIA®, Mosaiq®, Eclipse™, and Oncentra® is supported. Manual curation of RT-structure information is needed for approximately 10% of target volumes, but rarely for normal tissue structures, demonstrating a good compliance to the RT nomenclature. Aggregated dose/volume descriptors are calculated based on the information in MIQA and sent to INCA using a dedicated service (MIQA2INCA). Correct linkage of data for each patient to the clinical cancer registries on the INCA platform is assured by the unique Swedish personal identity number., Conclusions: An infrastructure for structured and automated prospective collection of syntactically interoperable RT data into a national clinical quality registry for RT data is under implementation. Future developments include adapting MIQA to other treatment modalities (e.g. proton therapy and brachytherapy) and finding strategies to harmonize structure delineations. How the RT registry should comply with domain-specific ontologies such as the Radiation Oncology Ontology (ROO) is under discussion., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This work explores different methods for accounting for patient-specific factors in normal-tissue complication probability (NTCP) modeling, and compares the performance of models using pseudoclinical datasets for "lung" and "rectum" complications., Methods: Datasets consisting of dose distributions and resulting normal-tissue complications were simulated, letting varying levels of confounding factors (i.e., nondosimetric factors) influence the outcome. The simulated confounding factors were patient radiosensitivity and health status. Seven empirical NTCP models were fitted to each dataset; this is analogous to fitting alternative models to datasets from different populations, treated with the same technique. The performance of these models was compared using the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and the impact of confounding factors on the model performance was studied. The patient-specific factors were then accounted for by (1) stratification and (2) two ways of modifying the traditional NTCP models to include these factors., Results: Confounding factors had a greater impact on model performance than the choice of model. All models performed similarly well on the rectum datasets (except the maximum dose model), while critical-volume type models were slightly better than the mean dose-, the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman-, and the relative seriality models for lung. This difference was more apparent without confounding factors in the dataset. The two alternative functions including patient-specific factors used in this work (one logistic and one cumulative normal function) were found to be equivalent, and more efficient than stratifying datasets according to patient-specific factors and fitting models to subgroups individually. For datasets including confounding factors, the performance improved greatly when using models accounting for these; AUC increased from around 0.7 to close to unity., Conclusions: This work shows that identifying confounding factors, and developing methods to quantify them, is more important than the choice of NTCP model. Most dose-volume histogram (DVH)-based NTCP models can be generalized to include confounding factors.