Search

Background There remains a paucity of data regarding the efficacy of immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) combinations ± vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeted therapy (TT) in translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC). Methods This is a retrospective study of patients with advanced tRCC treated with ICT combinations at 11 centers in the US, France, and Belgium. Only cases with confirmed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were included. Objective response rates (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by RECIST, and overall survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods. Results There were 29 patients identified with median age of 38 (21-70) years, and F:M ratio 0.9:1. FISH revealed TFE3 and TFEB translocations in 22 and 7 patients, respectively. Dual ICT and ICT + VEGF TT were used in 18 and 11 patients, respectively. Seventeen (59%) patients received ICT combinations as first-line therapy. ORR was 1/18 (5.5%) for dual ICT and 4/11 (36%) for ICT + VEGF TT. At a median follow-up of 12.9 months, median PFS was 2.8 and 5.4 months in the dual ICT and ICT + VEGF TT groups, respectively. Median OS from metastatic disease was 17.8 and 30.7 months in the dual ICT and ICT + VEGF TT groups, respectively. Conclusion In this retrospective study of advanced tRCC, limited response and survival were seen after frontline dual ICT combination therapy, while ICT + VEGF TT therapy offered some efficacy. Due to the heterogeneity of tRCC, insights into the biological underpinnings are necessary to develop more effective therapies.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have joined the armamentarium against urothelial cancer (UC) as an effective therapy option. Since 2019, the US Food and Drug Administration has approved 2 ADCs for advanced previously treated UC: enfortumab vedotin, which targets nectin-4 and sacituzumab govitecan, which targets trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2. These ADCs are now being tested in earlier disease settings and in previously untreated patients. Furthermore, novel ADCs (e.g., anti-HER-2) are being tested in the clinic and show promising clinical benefit. The next frontier is to understand the mechanisms of resistance and response, gaining experience with ADC-related adverse events and learning the best strategy to sequence and combine these agents with existing therapies. Here, we highlight the recent advances in the development of ADCs for treating localized and metastatic UC.

The androgen receptor (AR) is one of the oldest therapeutic targets in oncology and continues to dominate the treatment landscape for advanced prostate cancer, where nearly all treatment regimens include some form of AR modulation. In this regard, AR remains the central driver of prostate cancer cell biology. Emerging preclinical and clinical data implicate key roles for AR in additional cancer types, thereby expanding the importance of this drug target beyond prostate cancer. In this mini-review, new roles for AR in other cancer types are discussed as well as their potential for treatment with AR-targeted agents. Our understanding of these additional functions for AR in oncology expand this receptor’s potential as a therapeutic target and will help guide the development of new treatment approaches.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of the two most commonly used cisplatin-based regimens; gemcitabine, and cisplatin (GC) vs. accelerated (dose-dense: dd) or conventional methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, and cisplatin (MVAC). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and other sources. Outcomes of interest included overall survival, downstaging to pT≤1, pathologic complete response (pCR), recurrence, and toxicity. Meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model. RESULTS: We identified 24 studies. Efficacy outcomes were comparable between MVAC and GC for MIBC. dd-MVAC was associated with favorable efficacy compared to GC in terms of downstaging (OR 1.45; 95%CI 1.15–1.82) and all-cause mortality at longest follow-up (OR 0.63; 95%CI 0.44–0.81). However, GC was associated with a better safety profile in terms of febrile neutropenia (OR 0.32; 95%CI 0.13–0.80), anemia (OR 0.32; 95%CI 0.18–0.54), nausea and vomiting (OR 0.27; 95%CI 0.12–0.65) compared to dd-MVAC. Compared to MVAC, patients receiving GC had an increased risk of developing grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia (OR 4.70; 95%CI 1.59–13.89) and a lower risk of nausea and vomiting (OR 0.05; 95%CI 0.01–0.31). Certainty in the estimates was very low for most outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy and safety outcomes were comparable between MVAC and GC for MIBC. Including non-peer-reviewed studies showed higher efficacy with dd-MVAC. A phase III randomized trial comparing the two regimens is needed to guide clinical practice.

Introduction Enrolling patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) in phase I trials provides an opportunity to identify biological drug activity. Developing prognostic scores may aid in patient selection for phase 1 trials. Patients and Methods :We analyzed records of patients with mUC who participated in targeted therapy and immunotherapy phase I clinical trials at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). The Bellmunt and Bajorin scores were calculated as bladder cancer-specific prognostic scores. The Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) and MDACC scores were calculated as phase I prognostic scores. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model. The prognostic value of the Bellmunt, Bajorin, RMH, and MDACC scores were assessed using the Likelihood ratio (LR) χ2 test and the c-index. Results Between 2015 and 2019, 43 patients were enrolled in phase I trials and 12 were enrolled in >I trial leading to a total of 57 trial participants (TPs). Ninty-seven percent of TPs received prior platinum therapy and 60% received a prior checkpoint inhibitor. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were significantly shorter with increasing Bajorin, RMH, or MDACC scores, but not with increasing Bellmunt score. The RMH (c-index=0.658, LR χ2=11.8, P=.008) and MDACC scores (c-index =0.66, LR χ2=12.76, P=.01) outperformed the Bajorin score (c-index=0.522, LR χ2=1.22, P=.5) and the Bellmunt score (c-index=0.537, LR χ2=0.36, P=.9) in predicting overall survivalover. The Bajorin, RMH, and MDACC scores, but not the Bellmunt score, were also predictive of progression-free survival (PFS)prog. The RMH and MDACC scores again outperformed the Bajorin scoreand the Bellmunt score for predicting PFS. Conclusion The RMH and MDACC phase I prognostic scores accurately predicted survival in patients with mUC and outperformed the bladder cancer-specific scores at time of enrollment on phase 1 clinical trials. The RMH and MDACC scores could optimize selection of patients with mUC for phase I clinical trials.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy but can lead to GI toxicity, termed immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis (IMDC). Standardization of IMDC management and early GI consultation is imperative to control symptoms and prevent delays in cancer care. Therefore, we implemented an inpatient algorithm and a focused IOTOX GI service to measure outcomes.Patients who received ICIs and were hospitalized with severe IMDC were grouped into a pre-interventional cohort in 2017, followed by implementation of the standardized algorithm in 2018, and then a post-interventional cohort of patients in 2019. Clinical data and patient outcomes were compared using univariate and multivariate analysis to determine the morbidity, and overall survival.Our sample comprised 126 hospitalized patients with IMDC, with 59 patients in the pre-interventional 2017 cohort, and 67 patients in the post-interventional 2019 cohort. We found no significant differences in the clinical severity of IMDC symptoms between the two cohorts (p = 1.03) or median time from ICI exposure to development of IMDC (p = 0.495, respectively). After implementing the standardized algorithm, we observed higher rates of GI consultation (p 0.001) in the post-treatment group. Patients in the post-treatment cohort showed decreased time to clinical remission (4 vs 10 days, p = 0.046), higher rate of GI follow-up after hospital discharge (p = 0.038), fewer hospital re-admissions (p = 0.002), and significantly fewer recurrences of IMDC symptoms (p = 0.002). Overall survival was significantly higher for at least 2 years in patients who followed with GI post-discharge compared to those without follow-up (p = 0.003).Prompt GI consultation and monitoring of IMDC using a regimented approach can provide efficacious management, decrease time to clinical remission of symptoms, decrease re-admissions to the hospital, and improve overall patient outcomes.

Purpose:Data from the pre-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) era suggests patients who progress on bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) to muscle-invasive bladder cancer (P-MIBC) exhibit worse outcomes compa...

Purpose Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy but can lead to GI toxicity, termed immune mediated diarrhea and colitis (IMDC). Standardization of IMDC management and early GI consultation is imperative to control symptoms and prevent delays in cancer care. Therefore, we implemented an inpatient algorithm and a focused IOTOX GI service to measure outcomes. Methods Patients who received ICIs and were hospitalized with severe IMDC were grouped into a pre-interventional cohort in 2017, followed by implementation of the standardized algorithm in 2018, and then a post-interventional cohort of patients in 2019. Clinical data and patient outcomes were compared using univariate and multivariate analysis to determine the morbidity,, and overall survival. Results Our sample comprised 126 hospitalized patients with IMDC, with 59 patients in the pre-interventional 2017 cohort, and 67 patients in the post-interventional 2019 cohort. We found no significant differences in the clinical severity of IMDC symptoms between the two cohorts (p = 1.03) or median time from ICI exposure to development of IMDC (p = 0.495 respectively). After implementing the standardized algorithm, we observed higher rates of GI consultation (p

PurposeImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has revolutionized cancer care but is associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Recent case reports raised the concern that acute appendicitis may be an irAE. In this study, we sought to describe the disease course of post-ICI therapy appendicitis and its associated complications.Methods Adult patients who had an International Classification of Diseases code for appendicitis within the first 2 years after initiating ICI therapy from January 2010 to April 2021 and who had imaging evidence of appendicitis were studied retrospectively. Results 13,991 patients were identified who had ICI exposure during the study period, 44 had codes for appendicitis, 10 of whom met the inclusion criteria. Their median age at the time of diagnosis was 59 years. The median time from ICI therapy initiation to appendicitis onset was 188 days. The most common presenting symptoms were abdominal pain (70%) and fever (40%). Abscesses were present in two patients, and a perforation was present in one. All 10 patients received broad-spectrum antibiotics. Five patients needed surgery or interventional radiology drainage. Nine patients had resolution of appendicitis symptoms after treatment. ConclusionPost-ICI therapy appendicitis is rare but presents similarly to and has similar complications rates as conventional appendicitis. Appendectomy remains the mainstay of treatment, but its use can be limited in cancer patients. The decision to continue ICI therapy remains at the discretion of the clinician. Further studies are needed to bring awareness to and advance the understanding of this clinical entity.

A variety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are currently approved for the treatment of solid tumors and hematological cancers. However, TKIs are often associated with gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects (AEs), especially diarrhea. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to describe the clinical features and outcomes of TKI-associated lower GI AEs.This was a retrospective single-center cohort study of patients with cancer treated with TKIs from March 2016 to September 2020 who experienced diarrhea without other identifiable causes. Basic and GI AE-related characteristics and outcomes were compared using χOf 2172 patients who received TKIs over the study period, we included 228 in the final analysis. Of these, 166 (72.8%) had hematological cancers. Besides diarrhea, GI symptoms included nausea (36.4%), vomiting (21.9%), abdominal pain (15.4%), and bleeding (3.1%). Symptoms were typically mild, with 209 patients (91.7%) presenting with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 1-2 diarrhea. Only 5 patients (2.2%) received immunosuppressants for diarrhea treatment, 83 (36.4%) received no treatment, 29 (12.7%) received antibiotics, 101 (44.3%) received supportive antidiarrheal medications, and 17 patients (7.5%) needed TKI dose reduction or cessation of TKI use. When compared with patients with hematological cancers, those with solid tumors had a higher rate of hospitalization (29.0% vs. 7.2%; p 0.001) and mortality (75.8% vs. 43.4%; p 0.001) but a lower rate of recurrence of GI AEs (21.0% vs. 42.8%; p = 0.003. Only 15 patients (6.6%) underwent colonoscopy, with normal endoscopic findings in 8 patients (53.3%) and nonulcerative inflammation in 5 patients (33.3%). The inflammation universally involved the left colon. Twelve of the 15 patients who underwent colonoscopy had active colitis. In the hematological cancer group, patients with acute myeloid leukemia had a lower GI AE recurrence rate than did patients with other hematological cancers (7.2% vs. 30.1%; p = 0.001).Ten percent of cancer patients receiving TKIs experienced lower GI AEs, which were usually mild. Symptoms TKI-related GI adverse effects were nonspecific, often overlapping those of other cancer therapy-related GI AEs. Treatment of GI AEs was largely supportive, with limited roles for antibiotics and immunosuppressants.

The development of brain metastases (BMs) in breast cancer (BC) patients remains a challenging complication. Current clinical practice guidelines recommend local treatment of BMs without changing systemic therapy (CST) in patients with stable extracranial disease. We retrospectively investigated the impact of CST (when applicable as per treating physician’s discretion) following the diagnosis and management of oligometastatic (1–3) BMs in patients without extracranial metastases on the progression-free survival time (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model. Among the 2645 patients with BC and BMs treated between 2002 and 2015, 74 were included for analysis. 40.5% of patients had HER2 + disease. Median time from diagnosis of BC to BMs was 17.6 months. 54%, 8%, and 38% of BMs were managed by radiation, craniotomy, or combination, respectively. Following the primary management of BMs, we observed that CST occurred in 26 (35.5%) patients, consisting of initiation of therapy in 13.5% and switching of ongoing adjuvant therapy in 22%. Median PFS was 6.6 months among patients who had CST compared to 7.1 months in those who did not (HR = 0.88 [0.52–1.47], p = 0.62). Median OS was 20.1 months among patients who had CST compared to 15.1 months in those who did not (HR = 0.68 [0.40–1.16], p = 0.16). Upon the successful local management of oligometastatic BMs in patients without extracranial disease, we did not find a significant difference in survival between patients who experienced a change in systemic therapy as compared to those who did not.

Prognosis for patients with metastatic bladder carcinoma (mBC) remains limited and in need of novel therapies. We retrospectively analyzed medical records of 43 patients with platinum-refractory metastatic bladder cancer (mBC) who participated in one or more phase I trials of various investigational therapies. Patients' tumors or circulating tumor DNA were analyzed by next-generation sequencing. The median progression-free survival was 4.2 months, the median overall survival was 9.6 months, and the overall response rate was 17.5%. TP53, ERBB2, PI3KCA, FGFR3, and ARID1A alterations were detected in 66%, 29%, 27%, 24%, and 22% of all patients, respectively. Alterations in FGFR3 were almost mutually exclusive of TP53. More than half (64%) of patients with an FGFR alt received an FGFR inhibitor, 67% of which achieved disease control. Among patients with urothelial carcinoma histology, those harboring a TP53 alteration had a shorter median progression-free survival (PFS) compared with those whose tumors carry wild-type TP53. The reverse relationship was observed in patients harboring an FGFR alteration. Implications: Patients with platinum-refractory mBC derive clinical benefit from participating in early-phase clinical trials and their survival outcomes correlate with the genetic profile of the tumor. Visual Overview: http://mcr.aacrjournals.org/content/molcanres/19/3/395/F1.large.jpg.

Purpose of review Urothelial carcinoma is one of the 10 most common forms of cancer in the world with more than half a million cases diagnosed yearly. The past few years have witnessed a revolution in understanding the biology of urothelial carcinoma and the development of promising therapies. In this review, we summarize the emerging therapeutic approaches in the management of advanced urothelial carcinoma. Recent findings Since 2016, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved five checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs), a fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor, and an antibody drug conjugate (ADC) for the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma. Additionally, the FDA has granted several breakthrough designations for other therapeutic strategies including other ADCs. Summary CPIs, anti-FGFR agents and ADCs are significant advancements that offer new treatment options to patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. However, there remains a need to understand mechanisms of resistance, identify biomarkers to choose potential responders, and learn the best strategy to sequence these agents in regards to lines of therapy.

The past decade has witnessed a revolution in the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of multiple tumor types, including genitourinary cancers. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have notably improved the treatment outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and metastatic urothelial carcinoma. In prostate cancer, the role of immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors is not yet established except for microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) tumors. Other immunotherapeutic approaches that have been explored in these malignancies include cytokines, vaccines, and cellular therapy. Ongoing studies are exploring the use of immunotherapy combinations as well as combination with chemotherapy and targeted therapy in these types of tumors. The use of immunotherapy beyond the metastatic setting is an active area of research. Moreover, there is great interest in biomarker development to predict response to immunotherapy and risk of toxicity. This book chapter is a comprehensive review of immunotherapeutic approaches, both approved and investigational, for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, and prostate cancer.

522 Background: mSCUC is an aggressive cancer with historically poor outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 216 pts with mSCUC treated at MD Anderson from 1985-2020. We captured baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, metastatic sites, systemic treatments, and survival. Median overall survival (mOS) was calculated from start of frontline (1L) therapy for metastatic disease. Results: Median age was 67 years, 84% male sex, 91% primary tumor in bladder, and 88% white race. Histology included pure SCUC (30%), predominant SCUC (44%), focal SCUC (25%) and large cell (1%). Metastatic sites were lymph nodes (54%), bone/peritoneum (39%), liver (38%), brain (31%) and lung (26%). Brain metastases frequency varied across histology (pure SCUC 48%, predominant SCUC 24.5%, focal SCUC 24%, p=0.06). Treatment regimens and mOS by frontline regimen are listed (Table). mOS was 11.91 months for treated pts with sufficient follow up (n=155). mOS by 1L treatment: EP (9.51 months), IA/EP (14.10 months), other platinum chemotherapy (13.26 months), nonplatinum chemotherapy (9.74 months), immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) (6.51 months), EP+ICI (undefined). Of 140 pts treated with 1L chemotherapy, 43 (31%) were able to receive second line (2L) therapy. mOS among those who received 2L chemotherapy (n=27) was 13.65 months vs those who received 2L ICI (n=16) was 22.53 months (HR=0.53, 95% CI=0.26-1.10; p=0.11). Conclusions: mSCUC is a devastating malignancy with high degree of brain involvement, and poor prognosis. 1L ICI therapy alone has suboptimal survival outcomes and a chemotherapy backbone remains necessary. A deeper understanding of SCUC’s driver biology is essential for developing better therapies. [Table: see text]

TPS745 Background: A SEER analysis from 2010 to 2013 demonstrated that the incidence of brain metastases(mets) at the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma(RCC) is 1.51%, and around 12% of patients(pts) with advanced RCC (aRCC) also had mets to the brain. Brain mets confer a poor prognosis. Local management strategies for brain mets from RCC include surgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery and whole brain radiation therapy. Although systemic therapies including tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been explored in aRCC pts with brain mets, prospective data is lacking. Cabozantinib is a potent small molecule inhibitor of multiple tyrosine kinases that was approved by FDA for pts with aRCC alone or in combination with nivolumab. Cabozantinib has demonstrated activity in patients with intracranial tumors. A phase III trial (COSMIC-313) recently evaluated cabozantinib in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab compared to nivolumab plus ipilimumab and demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in previously untreated pts with aRCC. The combination was found to be safe as frontline systemic treatment. The role of this combination in patients with aRCC with brain mets remains undefined. As such, we propose a study to assess the safety and efficacy of cabozantinib in combination with nivolumab/ipilimumab in RCC pts with untreated brain mets. We believe the results from this trial could provide additional treatment options for pts with RCC brain mets who are typically excluded from clinical trials. Methods: This is a phase II study to assess the safety and efficacy of the combination of nivolumab with ipilimumab and cabozantinib in pts with untreated brain mets from RCC until disease progression or intolerable toxicities or patient withdrawal. Planned accrual is 40 pts. Pts will be treated with nivolumab (3mg/kg) and ipilimumab (1mg/kg) IV every 3 weeks for 4 doses and cabozantinib 40mg daily. Then pts will be treated with nivolumab 480mg IV Q 4 weeks and cabozantinib 40mg daily until progression or intolerable toxicities or patient’s withdrawal. A lead-in group of 6 pts will be closely monitored for dose limiting toxicities(DLT). If stopping criteria (>3 patients develop DLTs) is met, then treatment will be switched to nivolumab plus cabozantinib omitting ipilimumab. The primary objective is intracranial progression free survival(PFS). Secondary objectives include intracranial safety, objective response rate (intracranial + extracranial) by modified RECIST v1.1 and RECIST v1.1, extracranial PFS and overall survival. This phase II trial is currently enrolling pts. Clinical trial information: NCT05048212 .

514 Background: EV is FDA-approved in pts with aUC and ≥1 prior therapy line. Data from EV-103 trial indicate robust response to first-line EV/pembrolizumab, suggesting potentially at least additive treatment effect with EV/ICI combination. Given the long half-life of ICIs, pts who start EV treatment immediately after ICI may potentially derive benefit from that therapy sequence. We hypothesized that the last systemic therapy prior to EV would impact outcomes, as pts treated with ICI immediately prior to EV would have superior outcomes relative to pts treated with chemotherapy (chemo). Methods: UNITE is a retrospective study of pts treated with EV at 16 US sites. Pt characteristics and outcomes were abstracted from EMR review at each site. Observed response was determined by investigators for evaluable pts with scans following ≥1 EV dose. Pts treated with EV monotherapy were divided into two groups based on whether they received chemo or ICI as the line of therapy immediately prior to EV, regardless of other therapy received. Chi-squared test was used to assess differences in pt characteristics and ORR while log-rank tests were used for OS and PFS measured from EV start. Results: Among 325 pts treated with EV monotherapy, 247 had chemo or ICI as immediate prior treatment, with 186 pts receiving ICI (Group A) and 61 pts receiving platinum-based chemo (Group B). In 247-pt cohort, ORR to EV was 52% and mPFS and mOS were 6 and 13 mos. Group B pts were younger, had more bone mets and higher Bellmunt risk factors, but were otherwise similar to Group A (Table). Most pts had both prior chemo and ICI in both group A (58%) and group B (84%). Group A pts had shorter time from last treatment (median 1.2 vs 3.2 mo, p

450 Background: EV, an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting Nectin-4, is used widely in treatment-refractory aUC, but limited data are available on biomarkers predictive of EV outcomes. We investigated potential biomarkers of response to EV in a pt cohort in the UNITE dataset. Methods: We included the retrospective UNITE study pts from 16 sites, with available next generation sequencing using institutional or commercial platforms, treated with EV alone outside clinical trials. Observed response (ORR) was determined by investigators for evaluable pts with scans after ≥1 dose of EV. Assessed molecular biomarkers included tumor mutation burden (TMB), PD-L1 status, somatic alterations (alts) in ≥ 10% of pts ( TERTp, TP53, ARID1A, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, FGFR3, ERBB2, CCND1, KDM6A, MTAP, PIK3CA, RB1, TSC1) and presence of ≥1 DNA damage response mutations ( ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDK12, CHEK2, PALB2, PPP2R2A, or RAD51B). ORRs were compared using Chi-squared test, while median progression-free and overall survival (mPFS, mOS) from EV start were compared with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards in pts with and without biomarker presence. Results: A total of 170 pts had outcomes and NGS data available. Median age was 70, 133 (78%) were men, 144 (85%) Caucasian, 110 (65%) with pure urothelial histology, 118 (69%) with primary bladder tumor, and 116 (68%) had ≥ 2 lines of therapy before EV. For all pts, ORR 47%, mPFS 6 mos, mOS 12 mos. ORRs were higher in pts with ERBB2 (67% vs 44%; p = 0.05) and TSC1 (68% vs 25%; p=0.04) alts vs wild-type. Shorter mPFS was noted in pts with CDKN2A, CDKN2B, and MTAP alts, and longer mOS in pts with high TMB (table). Conclusions: This large, multi-site, retrospective cohort of pts with aUC identified several potential biomarkers associated with differential outcomes to EV. These findings, upon external validation, may help inform clinical decision making and potential therapy sequencing with available ADCs. Limitations include retrospective nature, pt selection, and confounding biases. [Table: see text]

A recent in silico study by Arnoff and El-Deiry found that urothelial carcinomas of the bladder and upper tract as well as chromophobe renal cell carcinoma are more likely than other malignancies to harbor alterations in the CDKN1A gene, encoding for the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21(Waf1), a major target of p53 regulatory pathways. Most of these mutations were truncating and thus presumably resulting in loss of p21(Waf1) function. Herein, we discuss the prognostic and therapeutic implications of these findings.

BackgroundThe risk of BMs in patients with aSCUC, having bulky tumors or non-cerebral metastasis at presentation, is high. We aimed to investigate the impact of ICB on the clinical outcomes of patients with aSCUC and BMs.MethodsPatients with aSCUC treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center between April 1992 and July 2019 were included if they had brain imaging and developed BMs during their disease course. Median overall survival (mOS) was calculated from diagnosis of BMs until death and if alive was censored at last contact. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using logrank test.ResultsAmong 216 patients with aSCUC, 111 underwent computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, and 34 (31%) were diagnosed with BMs. Baseline characteristics are included (table 1). At initial diagnosis of SCUC, clinical stage was cT1/x,cT2,≥cT3/4 or N+ (15%,44%,41%, respectively). Twenty-three (67.6%) underwent prior cystectomy, 16 (47%) had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Pathologic response at cystectomy after NACT was pT0/Tis,pT1,pT2,≥pT3b/4 or N+ (31%,6%,13%,50%, respectively). Those who did not undergo cystectomy (11, 32%) were either due to progression, declining surgery, or had de novo metastatic disease (27%,18%,55%, respectively). Regarding localized BM management, 9 (26%) patients received whole brain radiation therapy, 7 (21%) received stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and 7 (21%) received both. Median follow-up from BM diagnosis was 31.7 months. Five patients elected to pursue comfort care only, with mOS 0.7 months. Twenty-three patients received systemic therapy, including 11 (48%) who received ICB during any line of therapy. Majority of patients received ICB as single agent anti-PD(L)1; one patient received a doublet of anti-PD1+anti-CTLA4. Patients who were treated with ICB had numerically longer mOS as compared to those who solely received chemotherapy (10.7 months vs. 9.0 months, HR=0.47,95%CI=0.18–1.25,P=0.15), (figure 1). mOS decreased in patients with 1 vs 2 vs 3 vs ≥5 BMs (18.8,8.7,7.5 and 4.7 months, respectively, P=0.02), (figure 2). Furthermore, mOS improved with combination of ICB+SRS vs chemotherapy+SRS vs ICB without SRS vs chemotherapy without SRS (unreached,20.9,7.5,8.4, respectively, P=0.03) (figure 3).Abstract 241 Table 1Baseline characteristics of patientsAbstract 241 Figure 1Survival based on systemic therapy approach among all SCUC patients with brain metastases (n=34)Abstract 241 Figure 2Survival based on number of brain metastases among all 34 patientsAbstract 241 Figure 3Survival based on systemic + local therapy approach among SCUC patients with brain metastases with brain metastases who received both (n=23)ConclusionsIn this first analysis to describe outcomes of patients with aSCUC and BMs with the inclusion of ICB treatment and despite the small sample size, we see a trend toward increased survival with fewer BMs, especially with combined ICB and SRS. Although challenging due to its rarity, future prospective trials evaluating the synergy between ICB and SRS in SCUC should be considered.Ethics ApprovalThis retrospective study received approval from the MD Anderson Cancer Center institutional review board

Importance Owing to improved survival among US patients with prostate cancer (PC), patients tend to live long enough after a PC diagnosis for non–cancer-related comorbidities to be associated with their overall survival. Although studies have investigated causes of death among patients with localized PC, data are lacking regarding causes of death among patients with metastatic PC. Objective To assess causes of death among US patients with metastatic PC from 2000 to 2016. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database to analyze a sample of 26 168 US men who received a diagnosis of metastatic PC from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2016. Data were analyzed from February 2 to July 28, 2020. Exposure Diagnosis of metastatic PC. Main Outcomes and Measures Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for different causes of death were calculated by dividing the observed number of deaths from each cause of death by the expected number of deaths in the age-matched US male population for the same period, adjusting for age and race/ethnicity. Results Of 26 168 patients with metastatic PC included in the analysis, 48.9% were aged 50 to 70 years (mean age at diagnosis, 70.83 years); 74.5% were White individuals, and 72.7% received a diagnosis of stage M1b metastatic PC. A total of 16 732 patients (63.9%) died during the follow-up period. The mean age at death was 74.13 years. Most deaths (59.0%) occurred within the latency period of 2 years after diagnosis of metastatic PC, whereas 31.6% occurred 2 to 5 years after diagnosis and 9.4% occurred more than 5 years after diagnosis. Of the total deaths, 13 011 (77.8%) were from PC, 924 (5.5%) were from other cancers, and 2797 (16.7%) were from noncancer causes. During all latency periods, the most common noncancer causes of death were cardiovascular diseases (SMR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.26-1.42), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (SMR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03-1.36), and cerebrovascular diseases (SMR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.13-1.50). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, deaths from noncancer causes, including cardiovascular disease, constituted a substantial number of deaths among men with metastatic PC. Therapy and follow-up should be tailored to the needs of each patient with metastatic PC, and counseling regarding future health risks should be provided.

Simple Summary Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents 5 to 10% of urothelial carcinoma. Their mutational profile is different as compared to bladder urothelial carcinoma (UC). While immune checkpoint inhibitors are now part of the therapeutic landscape of urothelial carcinoma, data concerning their use in UTUC patient’s treatment remain scarce. The aim of this review is to summarize the available evidence and the biological rationale of using immune checkpoint inhibitors in high-grade UTUC. We reviewed the latest molecular characterization data and proposed an insight for future therapeutic strategies based on molecular alteration profiles. Abstract Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents a rare and aggressive malignancy arising from the renal pelvis or ureter. It can develop sporadically or have a hereditary origin, such as Lynch syndrome, caused by DNA mismatch repair deficiency, leading to microsatellite instability phenotype. According to molecular characterization studies, UTUC presents different mutational profiles as compared to urinary bladder urothelial carcinomas. In particular, it has been reported that UTUC harbored a higher level of FGFR3 alterations associated with a T-cell depleted immune microenvironment. The therapeutic landscape in urothelial carcinoma is rapidly evolving, with immune checkpoint inhibitors forming part of the standard of care. A greater understanding of the molecular alterations and immune microenvironment leads to the development of new treatment combinations and targeted therapy. This review summarizes the available evidence concerning the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and the biological rationale underlying their use in high-grade UTUC.

Summarize current evidence for cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) of variant histology.The mainstream treatment for advanced malignancy is systematic therapy, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Nonetheless, cytoreductive nephrectomy has been used in the management of mRCC including variant (nonclear cell) histology. Prospective data supported cytoreductive nephrectomy for clear cell mRCC in the cytokine immunotherapy era in the late 1990s. In the targeted therapy era, the practice of cytoreductive nephrectomy in nonclear and clear cell histology had been largely based on retrospective data, but a recent phase III trial showed that targeted therapy alone is noninferior to targeted therapy combined with cytoreductive nephrectomy, therefore, questioning the clinical benefit of cytoreductive nephrectomy in this context. However, this trial had excluded patient with nonclear cell histology. With the potential for checkpoint inhibitor combinations to achieve long-term complete durable response, cytoreductive nephrectomy is a subject of ongoing debate especially, in nonclear cell histology as those were excluded from prospective trials.Data are very sparse in nonclear histology. Although retrospective data favor the use of cytoreductive nephrectomy in nonclear cell mRCC, clinicians must carefully select patients and balance risks of surgery and delayed systemic therapy.

TPS3169 Background: Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AHR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor that regulates the activity of multiple innate and adaptive immune cells. Kynurenine, generated from tryptophan by IDO1 and TDO2, is a ligand that binds AHR and leads to a net immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, making AHR an attractive therapeutic target in multiple cancer types. IK-175 is a selective, small molecule inhibitor of AHR being developed as an oral agent. In preclinical mouse tumor models, IK-175 demonstrates antitumor activity as a single agent or in combination with checkpoint inhibitors. AHR immunohistochemistry (IHC) tumor microarray analysis across 15 different tumor types revealed that bladder cancer has the highest level of AHR protein expression and nuclear localization indicative of ligand-bound and active AHR signaling. Therefore, nuclear AHR in urothelial carcinoma tumors is being investigated for potential predictive clinical benefit with IK-175. Methods: This is a first-in-human, phase 1a/b, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation and expansion study of IK-175 as a single agent and in combination with nivolumab. The primary objectives are to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or maximum administered dose (MAD), identify the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and evaluate the safety and tolerability of IK-175 alone and in combination with nivolumab. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of IK-175, evaluate pharmacodynamic (PD) immune effects, and assess preliminary antitumor activity. Key exploratory objectives are to evaluate the PD effects on peripheral immune cells and target gene expression, to assess candidate baseline biomarkers, and correlative analyses of tumor AHR nuclear localization with clinical response. The study is exploring tumor AHR nuclear localization by IHC as a predictive biomarker in patients with urothelial carcinoma. A minimum of 10 patients with a positive AHR nuclear localization test (cutoff for positive AHR is 65% tumor cells positive for 2+/3+ nuclear AHR by a validated IHC assay) will be enrolled in the combination arm. IK-175 is administered daily in 21 or 28 day-cycles as a single agent, and in combination with nivolumab (480 mg q4w on Day 1 of every cycle), in adult patients with advanced solid tumors (dose escalation) and urothelial carcinoma (dose expansion). Key eligibility criteria include patients with histologically confirmed solid tumors (including urothelial carcinoma) who have locally recurrent or metastatic disease that have progressed on or following all standard of care therapies deemed appropriate by the treating physician including prior checkpoint inhibitors. Estimated enrollment is 93 patients; the study began in January 2020 and is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04200963.

TPS4612 Background: MTAP-deficiency occurs primarily due to homozygous loss in chromosome 9p21 and is seen in approximately 25% of urothelial cancers. MTAP-deficiency portends aggressive biology with poorer outcomes than in MTAP-proficient tumors; for example, in the IMvigor210 data, MTAP-deficient patients had median overall survival of 8.0 months, compared to 11.3 months in MTAP-proficient patients (p = 0.042). MTAP-deficient tumors lack salvage nucleotide synthesis pathways and thus are uniquely sensitive to anti-folate agents; however, in prior clinical work with pemetrexed in these tumors, responses are relatively short-lived. In-vivo data has suggested that pemetrexed can increase tumor infiltrating T-cells, macrophages, dendritic cells, and PD-L1 expression in MTAP-deficient tumors and decrease myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). As such, it was postulated that sequential treatment with anti-folate chemotherapy (pemetrexed) and immune checkpoint inhibition (avelumab) would improve responses in MTAP-deficient urothelial cancer. Methods: A prospective phase II trial of patients with advanced MTAP-deficient urothelial cancer is being conducted under IRB-approved protocol NCT03744793. This study will enroll 25 patients at a single site (The University of TX, MD Anderson Cancer Center). Key eligibility criteria include patients with advanced MTAP-deficient urothelial cancer with measurable disease in second-line or beyond. MTAP-deficiency is confirmed with CLIA-approved IHC or NGS. Patients are stratified as being IO-pretreated versus IO-naïve. All patients receive a lead-in cycle of pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) followed by combination pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) and avelumab (10 mg/kg) IV every three weeks until disease progression, patient withdrawal, or unacceptable toxicity. Three biopsies per patient with tissue collection at trial baseline, on single agent pemetrexed, and on combination pemetrexed-avelumab are performed. The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate response rate with sequential pemetrexed and avelumab in MTAP-deficient urothelial cancer. Imaging response assessment is done via RECIST v1.1. Secondary objectives are to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), as well as to perform correlative studies evaluating the effect of this therapy on immune cells and tumor microenvironment. This correlative work includes but is not limited to evaluation of peripheral T-cells, tumor-infiltrating T-cells, macrophages, and MDSCs. Interim analyses for futility and safety occur in cohorts of 5 patients and are performed based on Bayesian sequential methods. Fifteen patients have been enrolled thus far. Clinical trial information: NCT03744793.

4551 Background: SEL is a first-in-class nuclear exportin 1 inhibitor, which blocks the transport of several proteins involved in cancer-cell growth from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. A syngeneic RENCA mouse model showed that SEL combined with checkpoint blockade resulted in increased effector and activated T cells, and NKT cells and reductions in myeloid cells and Tregs. We hypothesized that SEL+NIVO and SEL+NIVO+IPI are well tolerated and improve the overall response rate (ORR) observed with anti-PD1/CTLA-4. Methods: NCT02419495 is an open label, single center phase IB study of SEL with multiple standard chemotherapy or immunotherapy regimens in pts with advanced malignancies using 3 + 3 design in dose escalation. For SEL+NIVO+IPI, SEL was 60 mg (N = 4) or 80 mg (N = 6) given P.O. weekly with NIVO 3 mg/kg x 4 cycles then 480 mg Q4W plus IPI 1 mg/kg Q3W for 4 cycles only. For SEL+NIVO, SEL was 40 mg twice a week (N = 8), or 60 mg twice a week (N = 11) given with NIVO 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W. Primary objective was to establish the safety and tolerability of SEL+NIVO and SEL+NIVO+IPI. Secondary objectives included ORR and progression free survival (PFS). Results: 29 pts with RCC (25 males) were enrolled (table), including 3 pts with nonclear cell RCC (nccRCC), with a median age of 64 years (IQR 56-69). 21 patients (72%) had prior systemic therapies. Most common SEL or NIVO/IPI treatment-related ≥ grade (G) 3 adverse events (AEs) included endocrine disorders (N = 3), hyponatremia (N = 3), leukopenia (N = 3), transaminitis (N = 3), thromboemobolic events (N = 2), asymptomatic lipase increased (N = 2), anemia (N = 1), pneumonitis (N = 1), nephritis (N = 1), colitis (N = 1), fatigue (N = 1). Two pts discontinued therapy due to AEs (G3 pneumonitis from SEL+NIVO+IPI and G3 transaminitis from SEL+NIVO, respectively). At a median follow up of 17.5 months, 5 (17%) pts achieved a PR, and 17 (59%) achieved a stable disease (SD). The median PFS for the entire cohort was 17.5 months (SEL+NIVO+IPI: 7.2 months, SEL+NIVO: 17.5 months). Among the patients with clear cell RCC who received SEL+NIVO+IPI as first line (1L) therapy (N = 4), all (100%) achieved SD as best overall response. Among the patients with ccRCC who received SEL+NIVO as 1L (N = 2), one patient achieved confirmed PR and the other achieved SD. The median overall survival (OS) was 27.8 months (SEL+NIVO+IPI: unreached, SEL+NIVO: 21.3 months). Conclusions: Treatment with SEL in combination with NIVO or NIVO+IPI is well-tolerated and shows modest clinical activity as compared to historic NIVO or NIVO+IPI activity. Clinical trial information: NCT02419495.

Deficiency of MTAP (MTAPdef) mainly occurs because of homozygous loss of chromosome 9p21, which is the most common copy-number loss in metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). We characterized the clinical and genomic features of MTAPdef mUC in 193 patients treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) and 298 patients from the phase 2 IMvigor210 trial, which investigated atezolizumab in cisplatin-ineligible and platinum-refractory disease. In the MDACC cohort, visceral metastases were significantly more common for MTAPdef (n = 48) than for MTAP-proficient (MTAPprof; n = 145) patients (75% vs 55.2%; p = 0.02). MTAPdef was associated with poor prognosis (median overall survival [mOS] 12.3 vs 20.2 mo; p = 0.007) with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.93 (95% confidence interval 1.35-2.98). Similarly, IMvigor210 patients with MTAPlo (n = 29) had a higher incidence of visceral metastases than those with MTAPhi tumors (n = 269; 86.2% vs 72.5%; p = 0.021) and worse prognosis (mOS 8.0 vs 11.3 mo; p = 0.042). Hyperplasia-associated genes were more frequently mutated in MTAPdef tumors (FGFR3: 31% vs 8%; PI3KCA: 31% vs 19%), while alterations in dysplasia-associated genes were less common in MTAPdef tumors (TP53: 41% vs 67%; RB1: 0% vs 16%). Our findings support a distinct biology in MTAPdef mUC that is associated with early visceral disease and worse prognosis. PATIENT SUMMARY: We investigated the outcomes for patients with the most common gene loss (MTAP gene) in metastatic cancer of the urinary tract. We found that this loss correlates with worse prognosis and a higher risk of metastasis in internal organs. There seems to be distinct tumor biology for urinary tract cancer with MTAP gene loss and this could be a potential target for treatment.