Search

INTRODUCTION: Factors predisposing asymptomatic individuals within the community to venous thromboembolism (VTE) are not fully understood. This study characterizes the incidence and determinants of VTE among the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis cohort with a focus on race/ethnicity and obesity. METHODS: This study (analyzed in 2020–2021) used the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis cohort (2000–2017), which includes participants with diverse ethnic/racial backgrounds aged 45–84 years without cardiovascular disease at baseline. The primary endpoint was time to diagnosis of VTE defined using ICD codes (415, 451, 453, 126, 180, and 182). Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios of the predictors of VTE were calculated with a focus on the interaction between obesity and race/ethnicity categories. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up period of 14 years, 233 individuals developed VTE. Incidence rates (per 1,000 person-years) varied across racial/ethnic groups with the highest incidence among Black (4.02) followed by White (2.98), Hispanic (2.08), and Chinese (0.79) participants. There was a stepwise increase in the incidence rate of VTE with increasing BMI regardless of race/ethnicity: normal (1.95), overweight (2.52), obese (3.63), and morbidly obese (4.55). The association between BMI and VTE was strongest among non-White women with the highest incidence rate for obese (4.8) compared with non-obese (1.6). The interaction for obesity, gender, and race was statistically significant (p=0.01) in non-White obese women. Risk of VTE increased with age for all race/ethnicities. Other significant predictors of VTE were cancer at baseline and follow-up, long-term warfarin use, smoking, and D-dimer levels, whereas statin use was associated with lower VTE events. CONCLUSIONS: This study finds that obesity may confer an increased risk for VTE among non-White women as compared with other groups—White men, White women, and non-White men.

Having a preterm birth is associated with future cardiovascular risk. Non-Hispanic Black women have higher rates of preterm birth than non-Hispanic White and Hispanic women, but nativity-related disparities in preterm birth are not well understood.Data from 6,096 women in the Boston Birth Cohort: non-Hispanic Black (2,699), non-Hispanic White (997), or Hispanic (2,400), were analyzed in June 2021. Differences in cardiovascular risk factors were assessed. The association of preterm birth with nativity and duration of U.S. residence were investigated using multivariable logistic regression.U.S.-born women in all 3 racial-ethnic groups had a higher prevalence of obesity, smoking, and severe stress than foreign-born women. Foreign-born non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic women had lower odds of preterm birth than U.S.-born counterparts (non-Hispanic Black: AOR=0.79, 95% CI=0.65, 0.97; Hispanic: AOR=0.72, 95% CI=0.56, 0.93). In all the 3 groups, foreign-born women with shorter (10 years) duration of U.S. residence had lower odds of preterm birth than the U.S.-born women (non-Hispanic Black: AOR=0.57, 95% CI=0.43, 0.75; Hispanic: AOR=0.72, 95% CI=0.55, 0.94; non-Hispanic White: AOR=0.46, 95% CI=0.25, 0.85), whereas the odds of preterm birth in foreign-born women with ≥10 years of residence were not significantly different.Foreign-born women had better cardiovascular risk profiles in all groups and lower odds of preterm birth in non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic groups. In all the 3 groups, a shorter duration of U.S. residence was associated with lower odds of preterm birth. Further studies are needed to understand the biological and social determinants underlying these nativity-related disparities and the impact of acculturation.

Objectives This study sought to assess the relationship between mean vs peak calcified plaque density and their impact on calculating coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores and to compare the corresponding differential prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality. Background The Agatston CAC score is quantified per lesion as the product of plaque area and a 4-level categorical peak calcium density factor. However, mean calcium density may more accurately measure the heterogenous mixture of lipid-rich, fibrous, and calcified plaque reflective of ASCVD risk. Methods We included 10,373 individuals from the CAC Consortium who had CAC >0 and per-vessel measurements of peak calcium density factor and mean calcium density. Area under the curve and continuous net reclassification improvement analyses were performed for CHD and ASCVD mortality to compare the predictive abilities of mean calcium density vs peak calcium density factor when calculating the Agatston CAC score. Results Participants were on average 53.4 years of age, 24.4% were women, and the median CAC score was 68 Agatston units. The average values for mean calcium density and peak calcium density factor were 210 ± 50 Hounsfield units and 3.1 ± 0.5, respectively. Individuals younger than 50 years of age and/or those with a total plaque area 100. Conclusion Mean and peak calcium density may differentially describe plaque composition early in the atherosclerotic process. Mean calcium density performs better than peak calcium density factor when combined with plaque area for ASCVD mortality prediction among persons with Agatston CAC 1-99.

IntroductionE-cigarette use among youth and young adults remains of public health concern. Pod-based e-cigarettes, including JUUL, significantly changed the e-cigarette landscape in the United States (US). Using an online survey, we aimed to explore the socio-behavioral correlates, predisposing factors, and addictive behaviors among young adult pod-mod users within a University in Maryland, USA.Methods112 eligible college students aged 18-24 years recruited from a University in Maryland who reported using pod-mods were included in this study. Participants were categorized into current/non-current users based on past-30-day use. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze participants’ responses.ResultsOf the 112 participants with mean age 20.5±1.2 years, 56.3% were female, 48.2% White, and 40.2% reported past-30-day (current) use of pod-mods. The mean age of first experimentation with pod-mods was 17.8±1.4 years, while the mean age of regular use was 18.5±1.4 years, with the majority (67.9%) citing social influence as the reason for initiation. Of current users, 62.2% owned their own devices, and 82.2% predominantly used JUUL and menthol flavor (37.8%). A significant proportion of current users (73.3%) reported buying pods in person, 45.5% of whom were below the age of 21. Among all participants, 67% had had a past serious quit attempt. Among them, 89.3% neither used nicotine replacement therapy nor prescription medications. Finally, current use (adjusted odds ratio (aOR):4.52; 95%CI:1.76,11.64), JUUL use (aOR:2.56; 95%CI:1.08,6.03), and menthol flavor (aOR:6.52; 95%CI:1.38,30.89) were associated with reduced nicotine autonomy, a measure of addiction.ConclusionOur findings provide specific data to inform the development of public health interventions targeted at college youth, including the need for more robust cessation support for pod-mod users.

Thoracic aortic calcium(TAC) is an important marker of extracoronary atherosclerosis with established predictive value for all-cause mortality. We sought to explore the predictive value of TAC for stroke mortality, independent of the more established coronary artery calcium (CAC) score. The CAC Consortium is a retrospectively assembled database of 66,636 patients aged ≥18 years with no previous history of cardiovascular disease, baseline CAC scans for risk stratification, and follow-up for 12 ± 4 years. CAC scans capture the adjacent thoracic aorta, enabling assessment of TAC from the same images. TAC was available in 41,066 (62%), and was primarily analyzed as present or not present. To account for competing risks for nonstroke death, we utilized multivariable-adjusted Fine and Gray competing risk regression models adjusted for traditional cardiovascular risk factors and CAC score. The mean age of participants was 53.8 ± 10.3 years, with 34.4% female. There were 110 stroke deaths during follow-up. The unadjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) for stroke mortality in those who had TAC present compared with those who did not was 8.80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.97, 12.98). After adjusting for traditional risk factors and CAC score, the SHR was 2.21 (95% CI:1.39,3.49). In sex-stratified analyses, the fully adjusted SHR for females was 3.42 (95% CI: 1.74, 6.73) while for males it was 1.55 (95% CI: 0.83, 2.90). TAC was associated with stroke mortality independent of CAC and traditional risk factors, more so in women. The presence of TAC appears to be an independent risk marker for stroke mortality.

Background: There are limited data on the unique cardiovascular disease (CVD), non-CVD, and mortality risks of primary prevention individuals with very high coronary artery calcium (CAC; ≥1000), especially compared with rates observed in secondary prevention populations. Methods: Our study population consisted of 6814 ethnically diverse individuals 45 to 84 years of age who were free of known CVD from MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis), a prospective, observational, community-based cohort. Mean follow-up time was 13.6±4.4 years. Hazard ratios of CAC ≥1000 were compared with both CAC 0 and CAC 400 to 999 for CVD, non-CVD, and mortality outcomes with the use of Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for age, sex, and traditional risk factors. Using a sex-adjusted logarithmic model, we calculated event rates in MESA as a function of CAC and compared them with those observed in the placebo group of stable secondary prevention patients in the FOURIER clinical trial (Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects With Elevated Risk). Results: Compared with CAC 400 to 999, those with CAC ≥1000 (n=257) had a greater mean number of coronary vessels with CAC (3.4±0.5), greater total area of CAC (586.5±275.2 mm 2 ), similar CAC density, and more extensive extracoronary calcification. After full adjustment, CAC ≥1000 demonstrated a 4.71- (3.63–6.11), 7.57- (5.50–10.42), 4.86-(3.32–7.11), and 1.94-fold (1.57–2.41) increased risk for all CVD events, all coronary heart disease events, hard coronary heart disease events, and all-cause mortality, respectively, compared with CAC 0 and a 1.65- (1.25–2.16), 1.66- (1.22–2.25), 1.51- (1.03–2.23), and 1.34-fold (1.05–1.71) increased risk compared with CAC 400 to 999. With increasing CAC, hazard ratios increased for all event types, with no apparent upper CAC threshold. CAC ≥1000 was associated with a 1.95- (1.57–2.41) and 1.43-fold (1.12–1.83) increased risk for a first non-CVD event compared with CAC 0 and CAC 400 to 999, respectively. CAC 1000 corresponded to an annualized 3-point major adverse cardiovascular event rate of 3.4 per 100 person-years, similar to that of the total FOURIER population (3.3) and higher than those of the lower-risk FOURIER subgroups. Conclusions: Individuals with very high CAC (≥1000) are a unique population at substantially higher risk for CVD events, non-CVD outcomes, and mortality than those with lower CAC, with 3-point major adverse cardiovascular event rates similar to those of a stable treated secondary prevention population. Future guidelines should consider a less distinct stratification algorithm between primary and secondary prevention patients in guiding aggressive preventive pharmacotherapy.

The prevalence of aortic valve calcification (AVC) increases with age. However, the sex-and race-specific burden of AVC and associated cardiovascular risk factors among adults ≥75 years are not well studied.We calculated the sex-and race-specific burden of AVC among 2283 older Black and White adults (mean age:80.5 [SD:4.3] years) without overt coronary heart disease from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study who underwent non-contrast cardiac-gated CT-imaging at visit 7 (2018-2019). Using Poisson regression with robust variance, we calculated the adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) of the association of AVC with cardiovascular risk factors.The overall AVC prevalence was 44.8%, with White males having the highest prevalence at 58.2%. The prevalence was similar for Black males (40.5%), White females (38.9%), and Black females (36.8%). AVC prevalence increased significantly with age among all race-sex groups. The probability of any AVC at age 80 years was 55.4%, 40.0%, 37.3%, and 36.2% for White males, Black males, White females, and Black females, respectively. Among persons with prevalent AVC, White males had the highest median AVC score (100.9 Agatston Units [AU]), followed by Black males (68.5AU), White females (52.3AU), and Black females (46.5AU). After adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors, Black males (aPR:0.53; 95%CI:0.33-0.83), White females (aPR:0.68; 95%CI:0.61-0.77), and Black females (aPR:0.49; 95%CI:0.31-0.77) had lower AVC prevalence compared to White males. In addition, systolic blood pressure, non-HDL-cholesterol, and lipoprotein (a) were independently associated with AVC, with no significant race/sex interactions.AVC, although highly prevalent, was not universally present in this cohort of older adults. White males had ∼50-60% higher prevalence than other race-sex groups. Moreover, cardiovascular risk factors measured in older age showed significant association with AVC.

The 2018 and 2019 guidelines from the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association reflect the complexity of individualized cholesterol management. The documents address more detailed risk assessment, newer nonstatin cholesterol-lowering drugs, special attention to patient subgroups, and consideration of the value of therapy, all with the aim of creating personalized treatment plans for each patient. Overall, the guidelines recommend shared decision-making to meet the individual needs of each patient.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship between mean versus peak calcified plaque density, their impact on calculating coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores, and to compare the corresponding differential prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality. BACKGROUND: The Agatston CAC score is quantified per-lesion as the product of plaque area and a four-level categorical peak calcium density factor. However, mean calcium density may more accurately measure the heterogenous mixture of lipid-rich, fibrous, and calcified plaque reflective of ASCVD risk. METHODS: We included 10,373 individuals from the CAC Consortium who had CAC >0 and per-vessel measurements of peak calcium density factor and mean calcium density. Area under the curve (AUC) and continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI) analyses were performed for CHD and ASCVD mortality to compare the predictive abilities of mean calcium density versus peak calcium density factor when calculating the Agatston CAC score. RESULTS: Participants were on average 53.4 years old, 24.4% were women, and the median CAC score was 68 AU. The average values for mean calcium density and peak calcium density factor were 210 ± 50 HU and 3.1 ± 0.5, respectively. Individuals 100. CONCLUSION: Mean and peak calcium density may differentially describe plaque composition early in the atherosclerotic process. Mean calcium density performs better than peak calcium density factor when combined with plaque area for ASCVD mortality prediction among persons with Agatston CAC 1–99.

Introduction: Preterm Birth (PTB) is an independent risk factor for future cardiovascular disease (CVD). Nativity-related disparities in CVD risk profile and risk of PTB have been shown among non-Hispanic Black (NHB) women; however, studies exploring these disparities among women of other races are limited. We hypothesized that foreign-born NHB, White, and Hispanic women will have better CVD risk profile and lower risk of PTB compared to their US-born counterparts. Methods: We utilized data from 6096 women with mean age 27.5(±6.3) years in the Boston Birth Cohort who self-identified as NHB (2699), White (997), or Hispanic (2400). We examined differences in sociodemographic characteristics and CVD risk factors such as smoking, obesity, and hypertension by nativity status. Using multivariable logistic regression models, we examined the association of nativity and length of U.S. residence with PTB by race. Results: Of the total sample, 27.2% delivered preterm (29.1%, 29.8%, and 24.1% among NHB, White, and Hispanic women, respectively). Compared to foreign-born women, US-born women in each of the three racial groups were younger and more likely to be obese, single, smoke in pregnancy, and report severe stress. After adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and CVD risk factors, foreign-born NHB women had lower odds of PTB compared to U.S-born NHB women (adjusted odds ratio, aOR: 0.79; 95%CI: 0.65-0.97). Similarly, foreign-born Hispanic women had lower odds of PTB compared to U.S-born Hispanic women (aOR: 0.72; 95%CI: 0.56-0.93). In all 3 racial groups, shorter ((Figure) Conclusions: US-born women in all three racial groups had a higher prevalence of CVD risk factors including smoking, obesity, and stress, compared to foreign-born women. The “foreign-born advantage” which is protective of PTB was not observed among foreign-born women with ≥10 years of U.S. stay.

Introduction: Smoking is a major risk factor for atherosclerosis, but its impact is heterogeneous across different vascular beds (e.g., stronger association with peripheral artery disease than coronary disease). However, whether the association of cigarette smoking with vascular calcification is (dis)similar across vascular beds is uncertain. Methods: In 1,961 ARIC participants without a history of coronary heart disease at visit 7 (2018-19), we quantified the associations of pack-years of smoking and years since cessation with coronary artery calcium (CAC) and extra-coronary calcification (ECC) using multivariable logistic regression models. High CAC and ECC (aortic valve, aortic valve ring, mitral valve, ascending aorta, and descending aorta calcification) were defined as Agatston score >75th percentile and were analyzed separately as dependent variables. Results: Pack-years of smoking demonstrated an independent and robust dose-response relationship with CAC, ascending and descending aorta calcification, and aortic valve ring calcification (Table). The association was particularly evident for descending aorta calcification (e.g., adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.57 [95%CI 2.46-5.19] for ≥40 pack-years). The results were similar for the duration since smoking cessation, with the most prolonged risk seen for the descending aorta (i.e., even ≥30 years of smoking cessation had OR of 1.34 [1.03-1.47]). Aortic valve and mitral valve calcification demonstrated modest associations with smoking. Conclusions: Cigarette smoking showed a robust association with coronary and extra-coronary calcification, and its association was particularly strong with descending aorta calcification. Our findings further emphasize the harm of smoking on broad ranges of vascular beds and simultaneously highlight unique pathophysiologic mechanisms across different vascular beds and cardiac valves.

Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is a marker of plaque burden. Whether CAC improves risk stratification for incident sudden cardiac death (SCD) beyond atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk factors is unknown.SCD is a common initial manifestation of coronary heart disease (CHD); however, SCD risk prediction remains elusive.The authors studied 66,636 primary prevention patients from the CAC Consortium. Multivariable competing risks regression and C-statistics were used to assess the association between CAC and SCD, adjusting for demographics and traditional risk factors.The mean age was 54.4 years, 33% were women, 11% were of non-White ethnicity, and 55% had CAC0. A total of 211 SCD events (0.3%) were observed during a median follow-up of 10.6 years, 91% occurring among those with baseline CAC0. Compared with CAC = 0, there was a stepwise higher risk (P trend 0.001) in SCD for CAC 100 to 399 (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR]: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.6-5.0), CAC 400 to 999 (SHR: 4.0; 95% CI: 2.2-7.3), and CAC1,000 (SHR: 4.9; 95% CI: 2.6-9.9). CAC provided incremental improvements in the C-statistic for the prediction of SCD among individuals with a 10-year risk 7.5% (ΔC-statistic = +0.046; P = 0.02) and 7.5% to 20% (ΔC-statistic = +0.069; P = 0.003), which were larger when compared with persons with a 10-year risk20% (ΔC-statistic = +0.01; P = 0.54).Higher CAC burden strongly associates with incident SCD beyond traditional risk factors, particularly among primary prevention patients with low-intermediate risk. SCD risk stratification can be useful in the early stages of CHD through the measurement of CAC, identifying patients most likely to benefit from further downstream testing.

The e-cigarette or vaping product-use-associated lung injury outbreak in the United States has raised concerns about the potential health effects of cannabis vaping, a method of cannabis use that is becoming increasingly popular. We used 2017–2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data to estimate yearly prevalence and trends of past-30-day cannabis use and vaping among US adults. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the associations of cannabis vaping with high-risk behaviors, asthma, and other respiratory symptoms. Our sample size was 160,209 (53,945–2017; 55,475–2018; and 50,789–2019). Past-30-day cannabis use prevalence increased from 10.0% (95% CI, 9.4%–10.7%) in 2017 to 13.4% (12.8%–12.0%) in 2019. Similarly, past-30-day cannabis vaping prevalence increased from 1.0% (0.8%–1.2%) to 2.0% (1.7%–2.2%) over the same period, with the greatest increase, 1.2% to 3.9%, observed among young adults (18-24 years). Individuals who vaped cannabis were more likely to concurrently vape nicotine. Cannabis vaping was associated with increased odds of heavy alcohol use (aOR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.45–2.63), binge drinking (aOR, 2.82; 95% CI, 2.25–3.54), and other high-risk behaviors (aOR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.89–3.24). In analyses adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and body mass index, cannabis vaping was not associated with asthma (aOR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.64–1.64) or other respiratory symptoms (aOR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.44–2.63). Adjusting for nicotine vaping did not substantively alter these associations. The prevalence of past-30-day cannabis vaping has increased, particularly among young adults, and was associated with high-risk behaviors. Although there was no association between cannabis vaping and asthma or other respiratory symptoms, the increasing trends of cannabis vaping, particularly among young adults, raise concern and underscore the need for continued surveillance.

Preterm birth (PTB) is associated with future cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and disproportionally affects non-Hispanic Black (NHB) women. Limited data exist on the influence of length of US residence on nativity-related disparities in PTB. We examined PTB by maternal nativity (US born vs foreign born) and length of US residence among NHB women.We analyzed data from 2699 NHB women (1607 US born; 1092 foreign born) in the Boston Birth Cohort, originally designed as a case-control study. Using multivariable logistic regression, we investigated the association of PTB with maternal nativity and length of US residence.In the total sample, 29.1% of women delivered preterm (31.4% and 25.6% among US born and foreign born, respectively). Compared with foreign born, US-born women were younger (25.8 vs 29.5 years), had higher prevalence of obesity (27.6% vs 19.6%), smoking (20.5% vs 4.9%), alcohol use (13.2% vs 7.4%), and moderate to severe stress (73.5% vs 59.4%) (allThe prevalence of CVD risk factors and proportion of women delivering preterm were lower in foreign-born than US-born NHB women. The "foreign-born advantage" was not observed with ≥ 10 years of US residence. Our study highlights the need to intensify public health efforts in exploring and addressing nativity-related disparities in PTB.L’accouchement avant terme (AAT) est associé à un risque futur de maladie cardiovasculaire (MCV) et touche disproportionnellement les femmes noires non hispaniques (NNH). Les données sur l’influence de la durée de résidence aux É.-U. sur les disparités de l’AAT liées au lieu de naissance sont limitées. Nous avons examiné l’AAT en fonction du lieu de naissance de la mère (née aux É.-U.Nous avons analysé les données de 2 699 femmes NNH (1 607 nées aux É.-U.; 1 092 nées à l’étranger) de la Boston Birth Cohort, conçue à l’origine comme une étude cas-témoins. À l’aide de la régression logistique multivariée, nous avons examiné l’association de l’AAT au lieu de naissance de la mère et à la durée de résidence aux É.-U.Dans l’échantillon total, 29,1 % des femmes qui avaient accouché avant terme (soit 31,4 % des femmes nées aux É.-U. et 25,6 % des femmes nées à l’étranger). Comparativement aux femmes nées à l’étranger, les femmes nées aux É.-U. étaient plus jeunes (25,8La prévalence des facteurs de risque de MCV et la proportion de femmes qui accouchent avant terme étaient plus faibles chez les femmes NNH nées à l’étranger que chez les femmes NNH nées aux É.-U. L’« avantage d’être nées à l’étranger » n’était pas observé lors de ≥ 10 ans de résidence aux É.-U. Notre étude illustre la nécessité d’intensifier les efforts de santé publique pour explorer et remédier aux disparités liées au lieu de naissance dans l’AAT.

Introduction: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) commonly presents as the initial manifestation of coronary heart disease in the general population. Coronary artery calcium (CAC), a sub-clinical marker of atherosclerosis, is a strong predictor of cardiovascular events. We assessed the ability of CAC to stratify risk of SCD. Methods: We studied 66,636 adults from the CAC Consortium, a large multi-center cohort of asymptomatic patients free of clinical CVD at baseline. We categorized participants into 4 CAC score groups—CAC=0, CAC 1-99, CAC 100-399, and CAC≥400. The primary outcome was defined by identifying accepted International Classification of Diseases codes for SCD on official death certificates obtained for all deaths from the National Death Index. Predictive value of CAC for SCD was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for age, sex and traditional risk factors. We performed standard area under receiver operating curve (AUC) analyses from fully adjusted logistic regression models, with and without CAC. All analyses were also repeated among participants aged 45-75 years. Results: Mean age of the study population was 54.4 years, and 33% were females and 89% were Whites. Over a mean follow up of 12.3±3.9 years, there were 211 SCD events. Participants with CAC=0 had lower absolute SCD rates compared to those with CAC≥400 (0.05 vs 1.28 per 1000 person-years, respectively). Increasing CAC scores (reference CAC=0) were associated with increasing SCD risk [CAC 100-399: HR (95% CI) 2.8(1.6-5.0), CAC≥400: 4.3(2.4-7.7)]. Addition of CAC to the fully adjusted model (vs without CAC) improved AUC for SCD among the whole study population (0.88 vs 0.86, P P Conclusions: We demonstrate the predictive value of CAC for SCD. CAC could be a cost-effective risk-stratification tool that can be used to help identify individuals at high risk of SCD who could undergo additional screening and management.

Introduction: Thoracic aortic calcium(TAC) is an important marker of extra-coronary atherosclerosis with known predictive value for all-cause mortality. We sought to explore the predictive value of TAC for stroke mortality, independent of the more established coronary artery calcium score. Methods: The Coronary Artery Calcium(CAC) Consortium is a retrospectively assembled database of 66,636 patients aged ≥18 years with no prior history of cardiovascular disease, who had CAC scans done for risk stratification and were followed-up for an average of 12±4years. CAC scans capture a view of the adjacent thoracic aorta, enabling us to assess TAC at no extra cost. TAC was analyzed as present or not present and we restricted analysis to those with this information available. To account for competing risks for death from other causes, we utilized multivariable-adjusted competing risk regression models adjusted for traditional cardiovascular risk factors (age, sex, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, cigarette smoking, diabetes, family history of CHD) and CAC score. We report the relationship between TAC and stroke mortality using sub-distribution hazard ratios(SHR) with 95% CI. Results: There were 41,066 patients with information on TAC, 110 of whom had stroke mortality. The mean age of participants was 53.8±10.3 years, with 34.4% female. The unadjusted SHR for stroke mortality among those who had TAC compared to those who did not was 8.80(95%CI:5.97,12.98). After adjusting for traditional risk factors and CAC score, the SHR was 2.21(95%CI:1.39,3.49). The fully adjusted SHR for females was 3.42(95%CI:1.74,6.73) while for males it was 1.55(95%CI:0.83,2.90). Conclusion: TAC was predictive of stroke mortality independent of traditional risk factors and CAC, more so in females. The presence of TAC appears to be an independent marker of stroke mortality risk though further research is needed to study its incremental value over existing cardiovascular risk prediction models.

This cross-sectional study uses data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to assess trends in e-cigarette use in the United States.

The increasing popularity and prevalence of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) use in the USA necessitates careful evaluation of their proposed benefits and potential public health harms. This report provides a detailed review of current scientific evidence on potential benefits and health risks associated with e-cigarette use. E-cigarettes were introduced as a less harmful alternative to combustible cigarette smoking. However, evidence on their use as effective and safe smoking cessation aids remains inconclusive. Their rapid uptake among tobacco-naive individuals can lead to nicotine addiction and subsequent cigarette smoking. Although e-cigarettes appear to be relatively safer than combustible cigarettes, they expose users to known harmful constituents whose long-term health risks remain unknown. While e-cigarettes have the potential to aid in cessation of cigarette smoking when used as part of a structured cessation program, use among tobacco-naive youth and long-term dual use with combustible cigarettes should be strongly discouraged due to excess risk with dual use.

Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is a highly specific marker for coronary atherosclerosis. The CAC Consortium, a multicenter, retrospective, real-world cohort study, was established to investigate the association between CAC and long-term, cause-specific mortality. This review summarizes findings from CAC Consortium studies published between 2016 and 2020, aiming to demystify CAC as a clinical decision-guiding tool and push the limits of who might benefit from CAC in clinical practice. CAC has been shown to effectively stratify cardiovascular risk across ethnicities irrespective of age, sex, and risk factor burden. In comparison to other widely used risk scores, CAC appears to be most consistent in its ability to add to cardiovascular disease (CVD) event prediction. Beyond risk stratification, CAC has been shown to identify high-risk patient subgroups. While currently recommended only for patients at borderline or intermediate risk by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (10-year atherosclerotic CVD event risk, 5% to < 20%), CAC scoring may also provide value in select young patients aged 30-49 years and in low-risk patients with a family history. While new studies emphasize that patients with a CAC greater than or equal to 1000 be considered a distinct patient group, a CAC of 0 has additionally emerged to be a reliable negative risk factor, identifying patients at low risk of both CVD and non-CVD mortality. © RSNA, 2020.

Background and aimsWe sought to understand the risk factor correlates of very early coronary artery calcium (CAC), and the potential investigational value of CAC phenotyping in adults aged 20-30 years.MethodsWe studied all participants aged 20-30yearsat baseline (N=373) in the Coronary Artery Calcium Consortium, a large multi-center cohort study of patients aged 18 years or older without known atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) at baseline, referred for CAC scoring for clinical risk stratification. We described the prevalence of CAC in men and women, the frequency of risk factors by the presence of CAC (CAC=0 vs CAC >0), and assessed the association between traditional non-demographic CVD risk factors (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, family history of CHD, and diabetes) and prevalent CAC, using age- and sex-adjusted logistic regression models.ResultsThe mean age of the study participants was 27.5±2.4 years; 324 (86.9%) had CAC=0, and 49 (13.1%) had CAC >0. Among the 49 participants with CAC, 38 (77.6%) were men, and median CAC score was low at 4.6. In age- and sex-adjusted models, there was a graded increase in the odds of CAC >0 with increasing traditional cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor burden (p=0.001 for linear trend). Participants with ≥3 traditional risk factors had a statistically significant higher odds of having prevalent CAC (OR 5.57, 95% CI; 1.82-17.03) compared to participants with no risk factors.ConclusionsOur study demonstrates the non-negligible prevalence of CAC among very high-risk young US adults, reinforcing the critical importance of traditional risk factors in the earliest development of detectable subclinical ASCVD.

Introduction Individuals who use electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) may have a poor perception of physical and mental health. We, therefore, studied the association of e-cigarettes with subjectively reported health domains. Methods We utilized cross-sectional data from the 2016 and 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), a nationally representative U.S. telephone-based survey. All variables were self-reported. E-cigarette use was characterized as never, former, or current. Health domains included overall health, physical health, and mental health, which was assessed as the frequency of emotional support, life satisfaction, and feeling stressed. Weighted multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models were used to examine the association between e-cigarette use and these health domains. Results Our study population consisted of 755,355 (79%) never e-cigarette users, 111,940 (16%) former users, and 28,917 (5%) current users. There was a significant association between e-cigarette use and the less favorable perceived state of overall health, physical health, or mental health. For example, the OR (95% CI) for the association of current e-cigarette use with health domains was as follows: good perception of overall health: 0.78 (0.74,0.83), physical health: 0.69 (0.66,0.73), adequate emotional support: 0.89 (0.79,0.99), feeling satisfied: 0.83 (0.71,0.96), or being free of stress: 0.64 (0.53,0.76). Similar results were obtained in younger individuals (aged 18-34 years). Conclusions E-cigarette use is associated with a less favorable perception of physical and mental health as compared to never use, particularly among younger adults. These results have important implications for clinicians for patient counseling and regulatory agencies to regulate e-cigarette sales.

Key Points Question What is the association between electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use and depression? Findings In this cross-sectional study of 892 394 participants in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System from 2016 to 2017, e-cigarette users had higher odds of reporting a history of clinical diagnosis of depression compared with participants who never used e-cigarettes. In addition, increased frequency of e-cigarette use was associated with incrementally higher odds of reporting depression. Meaning These findings highlight the need for longitudinal studies to examine the association between e-cigarette use and depression, which may be bidirectional., This cross-sectional study examines the association between electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use and depression in a nationally representative sample of the adult population in the United States., Importance The prevalence of the use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) in the United States has grown rapidly since their introduction to the market more than a decade ago. While several studies have demonstrated an association between combustible cigarette smoking and depression, the association between e-cigarette use and depression has not been thoroughly studied. Objective To examine the association between e-cigarette use and depression in a nationally representative sample of the adult population in the United States. Design, Setting, and Participants Cross-sectional study of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System database, 2016 to 2017. The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System is the largest national telephone-based survey of randomly sampled adults in the United States. A total of 892 394 participants with information on e-cigarette use and depression were included. Data analysis was conducted in May 2019. Exposures Electronic cigarette use status defined by self-report as never, former, or current use. Main Outcomes and Measures Self-reported history of a clinical diagnosis of depression. Results Of the 892 394 participants (414 326 [29.0%] aged ≥60 years; 502 448 [51.3%] women), there were 28 736 (4.4%) current e-cigarette users, of whom 13 071 (62.1%) were aged between 18 and 39 years. Compared with never e-cigarette users, current e-cigarette users were more likely to be single, male, younger than 40 years, and current combustible cigarette smokers (single, 120 797 [24.3%] vs 10 517 [48.4%]; men, 318 970 [46.6%] vs 14 962 [60.1%]; aged 18-39 years, 129 085 [32.2%] vs 13 071 [62.1%]; current combustible cigarette use, 217 895 [7.9%] vs 8823 [51.8%]). In multivariable adjusted models, former e-cigarette users had 1.60-fold (95% CI, 1.54-1.67) higher odds of reporting a history of clinical diagnosis of depression than never users, whereas current e-cigarette users had 2.10 (95% CI, 1.98-2.23) times higher odds. Additionally, higher odds of reporting depression were observed with increased frequency of use among current e-cigarette users compared with never users (daily use: odds ratio, 2.39; 95% CI, 2.19-2.61; occasional use: odds ratio, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.82-2.10). Similar results were seen in subgroup analyses by sex, race/ethnicity, smoking status, and student status. Conclusions and Relevance This study found a significant cross-sectional association between e-cigarette use and depression, which highlights the need for prospective studies analyzing the longitudinal risk of depression with e-cigarette use. If confirmed by other study designs, the potential mental health consequences may have regulatory implications for novel tobacco products.

Introduction The prevalence of e-cigarette use has increased dramatically in the last decade in the U.S. Understanding the prevalence, patterns of use, and risk factor associations of e-cigarette use in pregnant women is particularly important, as this could have potential health implications for the mother and the developing child. Methods Using Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey data from 2016 to 2018, adult women of reproductive age (18–49 years) who reported being pregnant (n=7,434) were studied. Self-reported current e-cigarette use was the main exposure. Other measures included combustible cigarette smoking status and high-risk behaviors (including other tobacco, marijuana, or heavy alcohol use; binge drinking; and others). All analyses were done in 2019. Results Approximately 2.2% of pregnant women reported current e-cigarette use, of whom 0.6% reported daily use. The highest prevalence of e-cigarette use was observed in the youngest age group of pregnant women (3.2%), with 41.7% of all pregnant current e-cigarette users being aged 18–24 years. There was a marked increase in the prevalence of current use of e-cigarettes among pregnant women from 1.9% in 2016 to 3.8% in 2018. Approximately 46% of pregnant current e-cigarette users reported concomitant cigarette smoking. Compared with pregnant never e-cigarette users, pregnant current e-cigarette users had a higher prevalence of other tobacco product use, marijuana use, heavy alcohol intake, binge drinking, and other high-risk behaviors. Conclusions These findings underscore the need to strengthen prevention and policy efforts, specifically in the vulnerable subgroup of pregnant women.

Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is a marker of overall coronary atherosclerotic burden in an individual. As such, it is an important tool in cardiovascular risk stratification and preventive treatment of asymptomatic patients with unclear cardiovascular disease risk. Several guidelines have recommended the use of CAC testing in shared decision making between the clinician and patient. With recent updates in clinical management guidelines and broad recommendations for CAC, there is a need for concise updated information on CAC interpretation on traditional electrocardiographically gated scans and nongated thoracic scans. Important points to report when interpreting CAC scans include: the absolute Agatston score and the age, sex, and race-specific CAC percentile; general recommendations on time-to-rescan for individuals with a CAC score of 0; the number of vessels with CAC; the presence of CAC in the left main coronary artery; and specific highlighting of individuals with very high CAC scores of greater than 1000. When risk factor information is available, the 10-year coronary heart disease risk can also be easily assessed using the free online Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis risk score calculator. Recent improvements in standardizing the reporting of CAC findings across gated and nongated studies, such as the CAC Data and Reporting System, show promise for improving the widespread clinical value of CAC in clinical practice. © RSNA, 2021.

Use of substances other than nicotine in e-cigarettes, especially marijuana, is becoming increasingly popular in the US. However, population-representative data on such poly-use (nicotine and marijuana) remains limited. We therefore conducted a cross-sectional logistic regression analysis of the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System among 16 US states/territories with data on past 30-day marijuana use to describe the emerging dual nicotine and marijuana vaping population. We additionally examined trends in marijuana use, including marijuana vaping, from 2016 to 2018. Of the 131,807 participants studied, 3,068 were current e-cigarette users, among whom 7.1% also vaped marijuana. Prevalence of nicotine-predominant, dual nicotine marijuana, and marijuana-predominant vaping was 3.36%, 0.38% and 1.09%, respectively. Compared to nicotine-predominant vapers, dual and marijuana-predominant vapers were older, had greater proportions of non-Whites, particularly Hispanics, and less likely to be current smokers (nicotine-predominant vs dual vs marijuana-predominant vaping: current tobacco use 44.7 vs 23.7 vs 11.1%). Proportion of dual vapers among current e-cigarette users was 8.6%, 2.6% and 7.1% for 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively. Prevalence of marijuana use increased from 8.97% (2016) to 13.1% (2018) while no clear trend was observed for marijuana vaping. Dual nicotine and marijuana vaping is prevalent in the US, and compared to predominantly nicotine vapers such users have higher mean ages, and are more likely to be Blacks, Hispanics, and never cigarette smokers. Marijuana use overall increased from 2016 to 2018. Dual vapers represent a large and important emerging population that will require dedicated study of health effects and tailored regulatory strategies.