Search

English abstract: The purpose of the following master’s thesis is mainly to explore the legal possibilities of a broadening in the legal foundation of self-defense as it is derived from article 13 of the Danish criminal code, so that the access to preemptive use of force in cases of domestic abuse, where continued abuse from the aggressor is imminent, but not in progress in some cases may be admitted. Doing so, the following aspects of the abovementioned matter has been assessed. Firstly, the thesis will conduct a thorough examination of the historical criminal protection of women in Denmark, the existing legal position in Danish law of self-defense, including grounds for exception from punishment in the Danish criminal code, the relevant international law and lastly, the inherent danger and risks of domestic abuse. Secondly, the thesis will analyze whether it is legally possible to broaden the foundation for legal selfdefense as it is proclaimed, and if there even exists a legal obligation to do so. It is in this regard concluded, that there exist no legal barriers hereto, if the aggressors right to life and to respect for their humanity is not overly limited, cf. the European Convention on Human Rights article 2 and 3, cf. article 1. It is furthermore concluded that Denmark, as of now, are not in general in violation of their positive obligations after article 2, 3 or 8, regarding the protection of the abused. It is also observed that there exists a discrepancy in the criminal protection of the abused in Denmark and Norway, where the criminal protection is more extensive. Thirdly, the thesis will discuss options for implementing the broadening in the legal foundation of self-defense. Between the options to either apply a wide interpretation, expanding on the wording imminent so that the time-related criteria of article 13 diminishes, or alternatively to alter the wording so that the criteria for the attack to be current or imminent is omitted. Based on considerati

Problemformulering: Hur arbetar banker i sin relation till fastighetsbolag med hållbarhet vid kreditgivning? Syfte: Syftet med studien är att beskriva och skapa en större förståelse för hur banker i sin relation till fastighetsbolag arbetar med hållbarhet vid kreditgivning. För att få en större förståelse avser vi även att se detta utifrån fastighetsbolagens perspektiv. Vi vill utöver detta få en uppfattning om parterna har olika syn på relationen i praktiken. Metod: Denna studie har genomförts med en kvalitativ forskningsmetod och vid studiens genomförande har en abduktiv forskningsansats använts. Den empiriska undersökningen baseras på semistrukturerade intervjuer med nio respondenter. Litteraturstudien genomfördes genom att teorier från tidigare forskningsstudier och från kurslitteratur samlades in.Analysmodellen som har använts i studien utgår från vår egen konstruerade analysmodell samt en kvalitativ innehållsanalys med hjälp av Gioia-metoden. Slutsats: Resultatet av denna studie visar att banker genom en långsiktig relation som präglas av öppenhet och förtroende mellan parterna är det främsta medlet att främja en hållbar utveckling. Bankerna strävar även efter att se en ständig utvecklingsprocess i fastighetsbolagens arbete med hållbarhet. Fortsättningsvis försöker inte banker att påverka fastighetsbolagens organisatoriska beslutsfattande vid kreditgivning och har inte heller några tydliga hållbarhetskrav på fastighetsbolagen. Dessutom använder sig inte bankerna av kapitalkostnader som ett incitament för att styra fastighetsbolagens arbete med hållbarhet. Vid kreditgivning är det den miljömässiga aspekten av ESG som väger tyngst för bankernas bedömning. Bankernas hållbarhetsramverk för bedömning och påverkan av fastighetsbolagens hållbarhetsarbete är i dagsläget fortfarande ytligt och relativt outvecklat., Research question: How do banks work within their relationship with real estate companies with sustainability in their lending process? Purpose: The purpose of the study is to describe and create a greater understanding of how banks in their relationship with real estate companies work with sustainability in their lending process. To gain a greater understanding we also intend to see this from the real estate companies' perspective. In addition to this, we want to get an idea of whether the parties have different view on the relationship in practice. Methodology: This study has been carried out with a qualitative research method and we have used an abductive research approach. The empirical survey is based on semi-structured interviews with nine interviewees. The literature study was carried out by collecting theories from previous research studies and from course literature. The analysis model that has been used in the study is based on our own constructed analysis model and a qualitative content analysis using the Gioia method. Conclusion: The results of this study show that banks, through a long-term relationship characterized by openness and trust between the parties, are the main means of promoting sustainable development. The banks also strive to see a constant development process in the real estate companies' work with sustainability. Furthermore, banks do not try to influence the real estate companies' organizational decision-making when granting credit, nor do they have any clear sustainability requirements for the real estate companies. In addition, banks do not use capital costs as an incentive to guide real estate companies' work with sustainability. When lending, it is the environmental aspect of the ESG that weighs most heavily in the banks' assessment. The banks' sustainability framework for assessing and influencing the real estate companies' sustainability work is currently still superficial and relatively undeveloped.