Search

Objective: To investigate the long-term outcomes of patients with combined primary sclerosing cholangitis/inflammatory bowel disease (PSC-IBD) undergoing both liver transplantation (LT) and total abdominal colectomy (TAC)., Summary Background Data: The fraction of patients with PSC-IBD that require both LT and TAC is small, thereby limiting significant conclusions regarding long-term outcomes., Methods: Adult and pediatric patients from nine centers from the US IBD Surgery Collaborative who underwent staged LT and TAC for PSC-IBD were included. Long-term outcomes, including survival, were assessed., Results: Among 127 patients, 66 underwent TAC-before-LT, with a median time from TAC to LT of 7.9 yrs, while 61 underwent LT-before-TAC, with a median time from LT to TAC of 4.4 years. Median patient survival post TAC was significantly worse in those undergoing LT-before-TAC (16.0 yrs vs. 42.6 yrs, P=0.007), while post LT survival was not impacted by the order of TAC and LT (21.6 yrs vs. 22.0 yrs, P=0.81). Patients undergoing TAC for medically refractory disease had a higher incidence of recurrent PSC (rPSC) (P=0.02) and biliary complications (0.09) compared to those undergoing TAC for oncologic indications. Definitive TAC reconstruction with either end ileostomy or ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) did not impact post-LT or post-TAC outcomes., Conclusions: Long term survival in PSC-IBD was contingent upon progression to LT and was not impacted by the need for TAC. PSC-IBD patients undergoing TAC for medically refractory disease had a higher incidence of rPSC and biliary complications. The use of IPAA in PSC-IBD was a viable alternative to end ileostomy., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Statement: All authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Locally advanced rectal cancer has historically been treated with multimodal therapy consisting of radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and total mesorectal excision. However, recent prospective trials and registry studies have demonstrated similar disease outcomes with nonoperative management for patients who experience an excellent clinical response to radiation and chemotherapy. This article reviews data regarding nonoperative management for rectal cancer, and highlights current challenges and limitations in a point-counterpoint format, in the context of two clinical cases., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: The authors have disclosed that they have no significant relationships with, or financial interest in, any commercial companies pertaining to this article., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Surgical treatment of recurrent rectal prolapse is associated with unique technical challenges, partially determined by the surgical approach used for the index operation. Success rates are variable, and data to determine the best approach in patients with recurring prolapse are lacking., Objective: The study aimed to assess current surgical approaches to patients with prior rectal prolapse repairs and to compare short-term outcomes of de novo and redo procedures, including recurrence of rectal prolapse., Design: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database., Settings: The Multicenter Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium Prospective Quality Improvement database. De-identified surgeons at more than 25 sites (81% high volume) self-reported patient demographics, prior repairs, symptoms of incontinence and obstructed defecation, and operative details, including history of concomitant repairs and prior prolapse repairs., Patients: Patients who were offered surgery for full thickness rectal prolapse., Interventions: Incidence and type of repair used for prior rectal prolapse surgery were recorded. Primary and secondary outcomes of index and redo operations were calculated. Patients undergoing rectal prolapse re-repair (redo) were compared with patients undergoing first (de novo) rectal prolapse repair. The incidence of rectal prolapse recurrence in de novo and redo operations was quantified., Outcomes: The primary outcome of rectal prolapse recurrence in de novo and redo settings., Results: Eighty-nine (19.3%) of 461 patients underwent redo rectal prolapse repair. On short-term follow-up, redo patients had prolapse recurrence rates similar to those undergoing de novo repair. However, patients undergoing redo procedures rarely had the same operation as their index procedure., Limitations: Self-reported, de-identified data., Conclusion: Our results suggest that recurrent rectal prolapse surgery is feasible and can offer adequate rates of rectal prolapse durability in the short term but may argue for a change in surgical approach for redo procedures when clinically feasible. See Video Abstract ., Los Enfoques Duraderos Para La Reparacin Del Prolapso Rectal Recurrente Pueden Requerir Evitar El Procedimiento Ndice: ANTECEDENTES:El tratamiento quirúrgico del prolapso rectal recurrente se asocia con desafíos técnicos únicos, determinados en parte por el abordaje quirúrgico utilizado para la operación inicial. Las tasas de éxito son variables y faltan datos para determinar el mejor abordaje en pacientes con prolapso recurrente.OBJETIVO:Evaluar los enfoques quirúrgicos actuales para pacientes con reparaciones previas de prolapso rectal y comparar los resultados a corto plazo de los procedimientos de novo y rehacer, incluida la recurrencia del prolapso rectal.DISEÑO:Análisis retrospectivo de una base de datos prospectiva.AJUSTE:Base de datos de mejora prospectiva de la calidad del Consorcio multicéntrico de trastornos del suelo pélvico. Cirujanos no identificados en más de 25 sitios (81% de alto volumen) informaron datos demográficos de los pacientes, reparaciones previas, síntomas de incontinencia y defecación obstruida y detalles operativos, incluido el historial de reparaciones concomitantes y reparaciones previas de prolapso.INTERVENCIONES:Se registro la incidencia y el tipo de reparación utilizada para la cirugía de prolapso rectal previa. Se calcularon los resultados primarios y secundarios de las operaciones de índice y reoperacion. Se compararon los pacientes sometidos a una nueva reparación (reoperacion) de prolapso rectal con pacientes sometidos a una primera reparación (de novo) de prolapso rectal. Se cuantificó la incidencia de recurrencia del prolapso rectal en operaciones de novo y rehacer.RESULTADOS:El resultado primario de recurrencia del prolapso rectal en entornos de novo y redo. Ochenta y nueve (19,3%) de 461 pacientes se sometieron a una nueva reparación del prolapso rectal. En el seguimiento a corto plazo, los pacientes reoperados tuvieron tasas de recurrencia de prolapso similares a los de los sometidos a reparación de novo. Sin embargo, los pacientes sometidos a procedimientos de rehacer rara vez tuvieron la misma operación que su procedimiento índice.LIMITACIONES:Datos no identificados y autoinformados.CONCLUSIONES/DISCUSIÓN:Nuestros resultados sugieren que la cirugía de prolapso rectal recurrente es factible y puede ofrecer tasas adecuadas de durabilidad del prolapso rectal en el corto plazo, pero puede abogar por un cambio en el enfoque quirúrgico para rehacer los procedimientos cuando sea clínicamente factible. (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria )., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2024.)

Background: Postoperative recurrence remains a significant problem in Crohn's disease, and the mesentery is implicated in the pathophysiology. The Kono-S anastomosis was designed to exclude the mesentery from a wide anastomotic lumen, limit luminal distortion and fecal stasis, and preserve innervation and vascularization., Objective: To review postoperative complications and long-term outcomes of the Kono-S anastomosis in a large series of consecutive unselected patients with Crohn's disease., Design: Retrospective study of prospectively collected patients., Settings: Four tertiary referral centers., Patients: Consecutive patients with Crohn's disease who underwent resection with Kono-S anastomosis between May 2010 and June 2022., Interventions: Extracorporeal handsewn Kono-S anastomosis., Main Outcome Measures: Postoperative outcomes and recurrence defined as endoscopic, clinical, laboratory, or surgical, including endoscopic, intervention., Results: A total of 262 consecutive patients (53.4% male) were included. The mean duration of disease at surgery was 145.1 months. One hundred thirty-five patients (51.5%) had previous abdominal surgery for Crohn's disease. Forty-four patients (17%) were actively smoking and 150 (57.3%) were on biologic therapy. Anastomotic failure occurred in 4 (1.5%), with 2 patients requiring reoperation (0.7%). Sixteen patients had postoperative surgical site infection (6.1%). With a median follow-up of 49.4 months, 20 patients (7.6%) were found to have surgical recurrence. In the multivariate analysis, perianal disease (OR = 2.83, p = 0.001), urgent/emergent surgery (OR = 3.23, p = 0.007), and postoperative use of steroids (OR = 2.29, p = 0.025) were associated with increased risk of overall recurrence., Limitations: Retrospective study and variability of perioperative medical therapy., Conclusions: This study showed very low postoperative complication rates despite the complexity of the patient population. There was a low rate of surgical recurrence, likely due to the intrinsic advantages of the anastomotic configuration and the low rate of postoperative septic complications. In experienced hands, the Kono-S anastomosis is a safe technique with very promising short- and long-term results. Randomized controlled trials are underway to validate this study's findings. See Video Abstract ., Resultado a Largo Plazo De La Anastomosis Konos Un Estudio Multicntrico: ANTECEDENTES:La recurrencia posoperatoria sigue siendo un problema importante en la enfermedad de Crohn y el mesenterio está implicado en la fisiopatología. La anastomosis Kono-S fue diseñada para excluir el mesenterio de una anastomosis amplia, limitar la distorsión luminal y la estasis fecal y preservar la inervación y vascularización.OBJETIVO:Revisar las complicaciones posoperatorias y los resultados a largo plazo de la anastomosis Kono-S en una gran serie de pacientes consecutivos no seleccionados con enfermedad de Crohn.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo de pacientes recolectados prospectivamente.ESCENARIO:Cuatro centros de referencia terciarios.PACIENTES:Pacientes consecutivos con enfermedad de Crohn sometidos a resección con anastomosis Kono-S entre mayo de 2010 y junio de 2022.INTERVENCIONES:Anastomosis Kono-S extracorpórea manual.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Resultados posoperatorios y recurrencia definidos como endoscópicos, clínicos, de laboratorio o quirúrgicos, incluida la intervención endoscópica.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron un total de 262 pacientes consecutivos (53,4% varones). La duración media de la enfermedad al momento de la cirugía fue de 145,1 meses. Ciento treinta y cinco pacientes (51,5%) habían tenido cirugía abdominal previa por enfermedad de Crohn. Cuarenta y cuatro pacientes (17%) eran fumadores activos y 150 (57,3%) estaban en tratamiento biológico. Se produjo filtración anastomótica en 4 (1,5%) y 2 pacientes requirieron reoperación (0,7%). Dieciséis pacientes tuvieron infección postoperatoria del sitio quirúrgico (6,1%). Con una mediana de seguimiento de 49,4 meses, se encontró que 20 pacientes (7,6%) tuvieron recurrencia quirúrgica. En el análisis multivariado, la enfermedad perianal (OR = 2,83, p = 0,001), la cirugía urgente/emergente (OR = 3,23, p = 0,007), el uso postoperatorio de esteroides (OR = 2,29, p = 0,025) se asociaron con un mayor riesgo de recurrencia general.LIMITACIÓN:Estudio retrospectivo. Variabilidad del tratamiento médico perioperatorio.CONCLUSIONES:Nuestro estudio mostró tasas de complicaciones postoperatorias muy bajas a pesar de la complejidad de la población de pacientes. Hubo una baja tasa de recurrencia quirúrgica, probablemente debido a las ventajas intrínsecas de la configuración anastomótica y la baja tasa de complicaciones sépticas posoperatorias. En manos experimentadas, la anastomosis Kono-S es una técnica segura con resultados muy prometedores a corto y largo plazo. Se están realizando estudios randomizados controlados para validar nuestros hallazgos. (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio )., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2023.)

Background: Surgeons are often asked to provide a diverting colostomy to enable healing or simplify management of sacral pressure ulcers. However, little evidence exists regarding the safety of a diversion in this often compromised patient population. We hypothesized that malnourished patients with sacral pressure ulcers have poor outcomes with fecal diversion., Methods: ACS-NSQIP (2012-2018) was used to identify patients who underwent elective diverting colostomy for sacral pressure ulcers. Demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative details were recorded. Postoperative complications and 30-day mortality were compared between patients with moderate/severe hypoalbuminemia (< 2.5 g/dL) vs those with albumin > 2.5 g/dL., Results: We identified a total of 863 patients who underwent elective diverting colostomy for sacral pressure ulcer. Mean age was 57.5 years old. Rate of associated comorbidities was high, with most patients classified as ASA class 3 or 4. Over 40% of patients had a preoperative albumin level < 2.5 g/dL. Thirty-day overall postoperative mortality was 6.7%. This was significantly higher in patients with hypoalbuminemia (11.4% vs. 3.5%, p < 0.001). On multivariable regression analysis, preoperative albumin < 2.5 g/dL was independently associated with mortality (OR 1.92, p = 0.039). Other factors associated with mortality included increased age (OR 1.04 per year, p < 0.001), preoperative sepsis (OR 1.66, p = 0.003), and Black race (OR 2.2, p = 0.01)., Conclusions: Diverting colostomy performed for patients with sacral pressure ulcers is associated with a substantial risk of postoperative death. Surgeons should carefully consider risks of diversion in this patient population, especially in malnourished patients with hypoalbuminemia., (© 2022. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.)

Surgeons are famously decisive, assertive, and confident. Unfortunately, we also often have a reputation for being blunt, harsh, and unprofessional. Unprofessional behaviors are unacceptable, and we believe that they are a symptom of surgeon distress and burnout. Unprofessional behaviors should be prevented, but equally importantly, so should the stressors that drive them. This is critically important for the future of our profession., (Copyright © 2022 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)