Search

The CDC7 kinase is essential for the activation of DNA replication origins and has been implicated in the replication stress response. Using a highly specific chemical inhibitor and a chemical genetic approach, we now show that CDC7 activity is required to coordinate multiple MRE11‐dependent processes occurring at replication forks, independently from its role in origin firing. CDC7 localizes at replication forks and, similarly to MRE11, mediates active slowing of fork progression upon mild topoisomerase inhibition. Both proteins are also retained on stalled forks, where they promote fork processing and restart. Moreover, MRE11 phosphorylation and localization at replication factories are progressively lost upon CDC7 inhibition. Finally, CDC7 activity at reversed forks is required for their pathological MRE11‐dependent degradation in BRCA2‐deficient cells. Thus, upon replication interference CDC7 is a key regulator of fork progression, processing and integrity. These results highlight a dual role for CDC7 in replication, modulating both initiation and elongation steps of DNA synthesis, and identify a key intervention point for anticancer therapies exploiting replication interference., CDC7 kinase acts at paused forks where it coordinates MRE11‐dependent fork processing, contributing to fork restart and modulating fork speed. Upon prolonged arrest and compromised fork protection, CDC7 promotes fork degradation contributing to replication‐dependent chromosome breakage.

The Sar1 GTPase coordinates the assembly of coat protein complex-II (COPII) at specific sites of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). COPII is required for ER-to-Golgi transport, as it provides a structural and functional framework to ship out protein cargoes produced in the ER. To investigate the requirement of COPII-mediated transport in mammalian cells, we used small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated depletion of Sar1A and Sar1B. We report that depletion of these two mammalian forms of Sar1 disrupts COPII assembly and the cells fail to organize transitional elements that coordinate classical ER-to-Golgi protein transfer. Under these conditions, minimal Golgi stacks are seen in proximity to juxtanuclear ER membranes that contain elements of the intermediate compartment, and from which these stacks coordinate biosynthetic transport of protein cargo, such as the vesicular stomatitis virus G protein and albumin. Here, transport of procollagen-I is inhibited. These data provide proof-of-principle for the contribution of alternative mechanisms that support biosynthetic trafficking in mammalian cells, providing evidence of a functional boundary associated with a bypass of COPII.

Ctcf (CCCTC-binding factor) directly induces Parp [poly(ADPribose) polymerase] 1 activity and its PARylation [poly(ADPribosyl) ation] in the absence of DNA damage. Ctcf, in turn, is a substrate for this post-synthetic modification and as such it is covalently and non-covalently modified by PARs (ADP-ribose polymers). Moreover, PARylation is able to protect certain DNA regions bound by Ctcf from DNA methylation. We recently reported that de novo methylation of Ctcf target sequences due to overexpression of Parg [poly(ADP-ribose)glycohydrolase] induces loss of Ctcf binding. Considering this, we investigate to what extent PARP activity is able to affect nuclear distribution of Ctcf in the present study. Notably, Ctcf lost its diffuse nuclear localization following PAR (ADP-ribose polymer) depletion and accumulated at the periphery of the nucleus where it was linked with nuclear pore complex proteins remaining external to the perinuclear Lamin B1 ring. We demonstrated that PAR depletion-dependent perinuclear localization of Ctcf was due to its blockage from entering the nucleus. Besides Ctcf nuclear delocalization, the outcome of PAR depletion led to changes in chromatin architecture. Immunofluorescence analyses indicated DNA redistribution, a generalized genomic hypermethylation and an increase of inactive compared with active chromatin marks in Parg-overexpressing or Ctcf-silenced cells. Together these results underline the importance of the cross-talk between Parp1 and Ctcf in the maintenance of nuclear organization. © The Authors Journal compilation © 2013 Biochemical Society.

In the most widely accepted version of the cisternal maturation/progression model of intra-Golgi transport, the polarity of the Golgi complex is maintained by retrograde transport of Golgi enzymes in COPI-coated vesicles. By analyzing enzyme localization in relation to the three-dimensional ultrastructure of the Golgi complex, we now observe that Golgi enzymes are depleted in COPI-coated buds and 50- to 60-nm COPI-dependent vesicles in a variety of different cell types. Instead, we find that Golgi enzymes are concentrated in the perforated zones of cisternal rims both in vivo and in a cell-free system. This lateral segregation of Golgi enzymes is detectable in some stacks during steady-state transport, but it was significantly prominent after blocking endoplasmic reticulum-to-Golgi transport. Delivery of transport carriers to the Golgi after the release of a transport block leads to a diminution in Golgi enzyme concentrations in perforated zones of cisternae. The exclusion of Golgi enzymes from COPI vesicles and their transport-dependent accumulation in perforated zones argues against the current vesicle-mediated version of the cisternal maturation/progression model.

The mechanism of transport through the Golgi complex is not completely understood, insofar as no single transport mechanism appears to account for all of the observations. Here, we compare the transport of soluble secretory proteins (albumin and α1-antitrypsin) with that of supramolecular cargoes (e.g., procollagen) that are proposed to traverse the Golgi by compartment progression–maturation. We show that these soluble proteins traverse the Golgi much faster than procollagen while moving through the same stack. Moreover, we present kinetic and morphological observations that indicate that albumin transport occurs by diffusion via intercisternal continuities. These data provide evidence for a transport mechanism that applies to a major class of secretory proteins and indicate the co-existence of multiple intra-Golgi trafficking modes. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02009.001, eLife digest The Golgi is a structure within cells where proteins and other large molecules are modified and prepared for delivery to locations inside or outside of the cell. Each Golgi is made from a stack of flattened sacs called cisternae that are filled with fluid and enclosed by a membrane. Proteins and other molecules are transported to the Golgi by packages called vesicles, which fuse with the outermost cisterna, which is known as the ‘cis-face’ of the Golgi, and unload their contents. From here, the proteins are processed and modified by enzymes as they move through the Golgi towards the ‘trans-face’ on the opposite side. The modified proteins are then re-packaged into vesicles before being sent to their intended destinations. But how do proteins move through the Golgi? Some researchers have suggested that proteins do not actually move: rather, the stacks of the Golgi move like a conveyer belt as new cisterna are added to the cis-face. However, other researchers have proposed that molecules proceed from one cisterna to the next inside small vesicles. It is also possible that proteins are transported through the Golgi in other ways, or by a combination of two or more methods. Now, Beznoussenko, Parashuraman et al. reveal that some small, soluble, proteins can move through the Golgi by diffusion. These proteins move much quicker than large protein complexes, which suggests that multiple transport mechanisms do co-exist within the Golgi. Furthermore, Beznoussenko, Parashuraman et al. found that these soluble proteins are most likely moving through some narrow tunnel-like connections between the individual cisternae. Following on from the work of Beznoussenko, Parashuraman et al., the main challenge is to understand how all the different types of proteins that move through the Golgi are transported—which includes roughly a third of all human proteins. As many of these proteins are important for human health, learning to control their transport might create new opportunities to understand and treat disease. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02009.002

Procollagen (PC)-I aggregates transit through the Golgi complex without leaving the lumen of Golgi cisternae. Based on this evidence, we have proposed that PC-I is transported across the Golgi stacks by the cisternal maturation process. However, most secretory cargoes are small, freely diffusing proteins, thus raising the issue whether they move by a transport mechanism different than that used by PC-I. To address this question we have developed procedures to compare the transport of a small protein, the G protein of the vesicular stomatitis virus (VSVG), with that of the much larger PC-I aggregates in the same cell. Transport was followed using a combination of video and EM, providing high resolution in time and space. Our results reveal that PC-I aggregates and VSVG move synchronously through the Golgi at indistinguishable rapid rates. Additionally, not only PC-I aggregates (as confirmed by ultrarapid cryofixation), but also VSVG, can traverse the stack without leaving the cisternal lumen and without entering Golgi vesicles in functionally relevant amounts. Our findings indicate that a common mechanism independent of anterograde dissociative carriers is responsible for the traffic of small and large secretory cargo across the Golgi stack.

The Sar1 GTPase coordinates the assembly of coat protein complex-II (COPII) at specific sites of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). COPII is required for ER-to-Golgi transport, as it provides a structural and functional framework to ship out protein cargoes produced in the ER. To investigate the requirement of COPII-mediated transport in mammalian cells, we used small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated depletion of Sar1A and Sar1B. We report that depletion of these two mammalian forms of Sar1 disrupts COPII assembly and the cells fail to organize transitional elements that coordinate classical ER-to-Golgi protein transfer. Under these conditions, minimal Golgi stacks are seen in proximity to juxtanuclear ER membranes that contain elements of the intermediate compartment, and from which these stacks coordinate biosynthetic transport of protein cargo, such as the vesicular stomatitis virus G protein and albumin. Here, transport of procollagen-I is inhibited. These data provide proof-of-principle for the contribution of alternative mechanisms that support biosynthetic trafficking in mammalian cells, providing evidence of a functional boundary associated with a bypass of COPII.

The organization of secretory traffic remains unclear, mainly because of the complex structure and dynamics of the secretory pathway. We have thus studied a simplified system, a single synchronized traffic wave crossing an individual Golgi stack, using electron tomography. Endoplasmic-reticulum-to-Golgi carriers join the stack by fusing with cis cisternae and induce the formation of intercisternal tubules, through which they redistribute their contents throughout the stack. These tubules seem to be pervious to Golgi enzymes, whereas Golgi vesicles are depleted of both enzymes and cargo. Cargo then traverses the stack without leaving the cisternal lumen. When cargo exits the stack, intercisternal connections disappear. These findings provide a new view of secretory traffic that includes dynamic intercompartment continuities as key players.

Newly synthesized procollagen type I (PC) assembles into 300 nm rigid, rod-like triple helices in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum. This oligomeric complex moves to the Golgi and forms large electron-dense aggregates. We have monitored the transport of PC along the secretory pathway. We show that PC moves across the Golgi stacks without ever leaving the lumen of the Golgi cisternae. During transport from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi, PC is found within tubular-saccular structures greater than 300 nm in length. Thus, supermolecular cargoes such as PC do not utilize the conventional vesicle-mediated transport to traverse the Golgi stacks. Our results imply that PC moves in the anterograde direction across the Golgi complex by a process involving progressive maturation of Golgi cisternae.