Search

Objective To determine the current state of Rheumatology in Catalonia and to update the information regarding previous studies. Material and methods Design Observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study. Data collection from January to June 2017. Sample Rheumatologists practising public healthcare activity in Catalonia. An online questionnaire was sent to gather individual data and data from rheumatology services/sections. Results Information was obtained on 109 rheumatologists: 39 men and 70 women; mean age: 47 ± 9 years. The number of rheumatologists has increased by 8% over the past 5 years. One hundred and one (92.7%) doctors qualified as rheumatologists through the MIR. Rheumatology practice was mostly in a hospital setting: 68 (62.4%) physicians. Ninety-six (88.1%) rheumatologists were full-time practitioners. Fifty-four (50%) rheumatologists also practiced in the private sector. Clinical practice was predominant: 76% of daily time was devoted to this area. Of note, it was found that most of the rheumatology services, 24 (705), were dependent hierarchically on other services, namely internal medicine and orthopaedic surgery. There are still 6 hospitals in Catalonia without a rheumatologist. Conclusions The number of rheumatologists in the public health sector of Catalonia has increased over the past 5 years. The mean age of rheumatologists is advanced and there is a clear predominance of female practitioners in the specialty. Many rheumatology services depend on other services. Rheumatology activity is primarily focussed in the city of Barcelona.

Resumen Objetivo Determinar el estado actual de la reumatologia en Cataluna, y actualizar la informacion respecto a los estudios previos. Material y metodos Diseno Estudio observacional, descriptivo y transversal. Recogida de datos de enero a junio de 2017. Muestra Reumatologos que ejercen actividad asistencial publica en Cataluna. Se envio un cuestionario en linea recabando informacion tanto de forma individual como colectiva de los servicios de reumatologia. Resultados Se obtuvo informacion de 34 hospitales y de 109 reumatologos: 39 varones y 70 mujeres; edad media: 47 ± 9 anos. El numero de reumatologos aumento un 8% en los ultimos 5 anos. La obtencion del titulo fue en 101 (92,7%) casos por via MIR. Noventa y seis (88,1%) facultativos tenian dedicacion completa. Un 50% de los reumatologos ejercian ademas en el sector privado. La actividad asistencial suponia un 76% de la jornada laboral. Se constato que 24 (70%) servicios de reumatologia dependian jerarquicamente de otra especialidad. En 6 hospitales de Cataluna no disponen de reumatologo. Conclusiones El numero de reumatologos aumento respecto hace 5 anos. La edad media de los reumatologos es avanzada y existe un claro predominio femenino en la especialidad. Un gran numero de unidades de reumatologia dependen de otros servicios. La actividad reumatologica se centra en Barcelona.

Objective We aimed to investigate the association between the different antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and both systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) manifestations. Methods Patients from the RELESSER registry, a Spanish retrospective, cross-sectional, forty-five hospital registry of adult SLE patients, were included. Results Out of a total of 3,658 SLE patients, 1372 were aPL positive (555 of them fulfilled criteria for APS). All aPL types showed a negative association with cutaneous SLE manifestations. Lupus anticoagulant (LA) and anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) were both associated with haematological, ophthalmological and neuropsychiatric manifestations. IgG isotypes were associated with a higher risk of lupus manifestations compared with IgM. We found that the risk of neuropsychiatric and ophthalmological manifestations significantly increased with a higher number of positive aPL whereas the risk of cutaneous symptoms showed a negative correlation. All types of aPL, and more strongly LA, were associated with non-criteria antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) manifestations such as thrombocytopenia and haemolytic anaemia. Moreover, LA and aCL (particularly IgG isotype) were also associated with Libman-Sacks endocarditis and cognitive impairment. This association was stronger with more than one positive aPL. All types of aPL were also associated with classic APS manifestations, although LA, IgG isotypes, and patients with more than one aPL displayed a higher risk. Conclusion There is a hierarchy for aPL and the risk of APS and SLE manifestations. aCL, and especially LA, confer a higher risk for major organ involvement in SLE. IgG isotypes seem to have a more important role. The load of aPL confer a higher risk for APS and certain SLE manifestations.

espanolEl registro de lupus de la Sociedad Espanola de Reumatologia (RELESSER) es un registro multicentrico de pacientes con lupus eritematoso sistemico seguidos en servicios de reumatologia espanoles, que contiene cuantiosa informacion sobre 4.024 pacientes. Hasta la fecha han sido publicados 14 analisis sobre la fase transversal del registro. Se describen los resultados mas relevantes, a criterio de los autores, concernientes a las caracteristicas clinicas acumuladas, nivel de actividad, tratamientos, refractariedad, dano y mortalidad. Se revisan asimismo los resultados de analisis especificos sobre el lupus incompleto, la nefritis lupica, las manifestaciones respiratorias, los eventos cardiovasculares, las infecciones graves, las neoplasias, la fibromialgia, el lupus en varones, el lupus en latinoamericanos y el lupus de inicio juvenil, comparando los diferentes subgrupos con el total de la cohorte. RELESSER se ha constituido como uno de los registros clinicos de lupus eritematoso sistemico mas importantes del mundo, resultando altamente productivo en terminos de generacion de conocimiento de la enfermedad en pacientes espanoles, util tambien para toda la comunidad cientifica. EnglishThe lupus register of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (RELESSER) is a multicentre register of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) under follow-up by Spanish Rheumatology Services. It contains data on a total of 4024 patients with SLE. So far, 14 studies have been published from the transversal phase of RELESSER. Here we report the more relevant contributions of those studies, according to the authors’ perspective, concerning cumulative clinical characteristics, level of activity, treatments, refractory disease, damage and mortality. We also review the main results of the analysis regarding incomplete SLE, lupus nephritis, respiratory manifestations, cardiovascular disease, serious infection, malignancies, fibromyalgia, SLE in males, SLE in Hispanics and juvenile-onset SLE, comparing the main characteristics of each subgroup to the global cohort. RELESSER has become one of the most important clinical SLE registers around the world, with a high yield in terms of knowledge generation about the disease in Spain, also useful for the entire scientific community.

The lupus register of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (RELESSER) is a multicentre register of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) under follow-up by Spanish Rheumatology Services. It contains data on a total of 4024 patients with SLE. So far, 14 studies have been published from the transversal phase of RELESSER. Here we report the more relevant contributions of those studies, according to the authors' perspective, concerning cumulative clinical characteristics, level of activity, treatments, refractory disease, damage and mortality. We also review the main results of the analysis regarding incomplete SLE, lupus nephritis, respiratory manifestations, cardiovascular disease, serious infection, malignancies, fibromyalgia, SLE in males, SLE in Hispanics and juvenile-onset SLE, comparing the main characteristics of each subgroup to the global cohort. RELESSER has become one of the most important clinical SLE registers around the world, with a high yield in terms of knowledge generation about the disease in Spain, also useful for the entire scientific community.

Management of systemic autoimmune diseases is challenging for physicians in their clinical practice. Although not common, they affect thousands of patients in Spain. The family doctor faces patients with symptoms and non-specific cutaneous, mucous, joint, vascular signs or abnormal laboratory findings at the start of the disease process and has to determine when to refer patients to the specialist. To aid in disease detection and better referral, the Spanish Society of Rheumatology and the Spanish Society of Family Medicine has created a group of experts who selected 26 symptoms, key signs and abnormal laboratory findings which were organized by organ and apparatus. Family doctors and rheumatologists with an interest in autoimmune systemic diseases were selected and formed mixed groups of two that then elaborated algorithms for diagnostic guidelines and referral. The algorithms were then reviewed, homogenized and adapted to the algorithm format and application for cell phone (apps) download. The result is the current Referral document of systemic autoimmune diseases for the family doctor in paper format and app (download). It contains easy-to-use algorithms using data from anamnesis, physical examination and laboratory results usually available to primary care, that help diagnose and refer patients to rheumatology or other specialties if needed. (C) 2019 Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. and Sociedad Espanola de Reumatologia y Colegio Mexicano de Reumatologia. All rights reserved.

Objective: To assess the incidence of serious infection (SI) and associated factors in a large juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (jSLE) retrospective cohort. Methods: All patients in the Spanish Rheumatology Society Lupus Registry (RELESSER) who meet >= 4 ACR-97 SLE criteria and disease onset = 6, 5.8%). Incidence rate was 3.7 (95%CI: 3.2-4.2) SI per 100 patient years. Respiratory location and bacterial infections were the most frequent. Higher number of SLE classification criteria, SLICC/ACR DI score and immunosuppressants use were associated to the presence of SI. Associated factors to shorter time to first infection were higher number of SLE criteria, splenectomy and immunosuppressants use. Conclusions: The risk of SI in jSLE patients is significant and higher than aSLE. It is associated to higher number of SLE criteria, damage accrual, some immunosuppressants and splenectomy. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Objectives To assess the characteristics and risk of lymphoma in a large cohort of patients with SLE. Methods A case–cohort analysis was performed within a dynamic cohort of SLE patients from the Spanish Society of Rheumatology Lupus Registry (RELESSER). Clinical and analytical features were compared between the lymphoma SLE group and the control SLE group using an independent-sample Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney test for continuous variables and the χ2 test for categorical variables with Fisher’s exact test if necessary. The multivariate analysis was based on a generalized linear model. Results Twenty-one patients with SLE and lymphoma and 3965 non-lymphoma controls with SLE were studied. Most lymphomas were of B cell origin (n = 15/21), with diffuse large B cell lymphoma being the most frequent histological type (8/21, 38.1%). As in the general population, the risk of lymphoma in SLE was higher in male than in female patients and increased with age. In the lymphoma SLE group, bivariate analysis showed a significantly higher percentage of pericarditis, organic brain syndrome, seizures, vasculitis, haemolytic anaemia, splenomegaly, venous thrombosis and mean modified (excluding lymphoma) SLICC/ACR damage index. In contrast, renal involvement, positive anti-dsDNA, and antimalarials ever were less frequent. Conclusions In this large multicentre Spanish cohort, we identified characteristics of SLE that are associated with a higher risk of lymphoma. Antimalarials were significantly negatively associated with risk of lymphoma in SLE patients. Nevertheless, further prospective studies are needed to clarify these findings.

To study retention of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) or apremilast and potential predictors of lack of response in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). A single-center retrospective analysis of PsA patients who received ≥ 1 bDMARD or apremilast during 2000–2018. The main endpoint was lack of response (primary or secondary failure). Analyses included retention of DMARDs (Kaplan–Meier curves) and potential predictors of lack of response (bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models). A total of 159 patients with PsA received up to 8 DMARDs: etanercept (34%), adalimumab (30%), infliximab (9%), golimumab (9%), apremilast (7%), ustekinumab (5%), certolizumab (4%), and secukinumab (2%). Therapy was discontinued in 96 cases (60%), mainly owing to secondary failure (37%), followed by primary failure (25%) and adverse effects (24%). Retention was analyzed based on 313 units of analysis. Duration of follow-up was 846.1 treatment-years (maximum 14.8 years, median 2.75 years). A total of 172 DMARDs were discontinued. The probability of continuing the initial treatment was 37% at 5 years, 22% at 10 years, and 12% at 14 years. The longest medium retention time was observed for infliximab (6.2 years) and etanercept (4.5 years). Predictors of lack of response included male sex, number of swollen joints, and, especially, depression (OR = 35.2). The sensitivity and specificity of the model were 86.4% and 85.7%, respectively, with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 45.6 (ROC, 0.912). Rates of discontinuation due to primary and secondary failure are high in PsA. Retention is better for anti-TNF agents than for other agents.

Objective SLE can affect any part of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. GI symptoms are reported to occur in >50% of SLE patients. To describe the GI manifestations of SLE in the RELESSER (Registry of SLE Patients of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology) cohort and to determine whether these are associated with a more severe disease, damage accrual and a worse prognosis. Methods We conducted a nationwide, retrospective, multicentre, cross-sectional cohort study of 3658 SLE patients who fulfil ≥4 ACR-97 criteria. Data on demographics, disease characteristics, activity (SLEDAI-2K or BILAG), damage (SLICC/ACR/DI) and therapies were collected. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between lupus patients with and without GI damage to establish whether GI damage is associated with a more severe disease. Results From 3654 lupus patients, 3.7% developed GI damage. Patients in this group (group 1) were older, they had longer disease duration, and were more likely to have vasculitis, renal disease and serositis than patients without GI damage (group 2). Hospitalizations and mortality were significantly higher in group 1. Patients in group 1 had higher modified SDI (SLICC Damage Index). The presence of oral ulcers reduced the risk of developing damage in 33% of patients. Conclusion Having GI damage is associated with a worse prognosis. Patients on a high dose of glucocorticoids are at higher risk of developing GI damage which reinforces the strategy of minimizing glucocorticoids. Oral ulcers appear to decrease the risk of GI damage.

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-lup-10.1177_0961203320950477 for Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) implies a more severe disease with more damage accrual and higher mortality by Leyre Riancho-Zarrabeitia, Victor Martínez-Taboada, Iñigo Rúa-Figueroa, Fernando Alonso, María Galindo-Izquierdo, Juan Ovalles, Alejandro Olivé-Marqués, Antonio Fernández-Nebro, Jaime Calvo-Alén, Raúl Menor-Almagro, Eva Tomero-Muriel, Esther Uriarte-Isacelaya, Alina Botenau, Mariano Andres, Mercedes Freire-González, Gregorio Santos Soler, Esther Ruiz-Lucea, Mónica Ibáñez-Barceló, Iván Castellví, Carlos Galisteo, Víctor Quevedo Vila, Enrique Raya, Javier Narváez-García, Lorena Expósito, José A Hernández-Beriaín, Loreto Horcada, Elena Aurrecoechea and Jose M. Pego-Reigosa in Lupus

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-2-lup-10.1177_0961203320950477 for Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) implies a more severe disease with more damage accrual and higher mortality by Leyre Riancho-Zarrabeitia, Victor Martínez-Taboada, Iñigo Rúa-Figueroa, Fernando Alonso, María Galindo-Izquierdo, Juan Ovalles, Alejandro Olivé-Marqués, Antonio Fernández-Nebro, Jaime Calvo-Alén, Raúl Menor-Almagro, Eva Tomero-Muriel, Esther Uriarte-Isacelaya, Alina Botenau, Mariano Andres, Mercedes Freire-González, Gregorio Santos Soler, Esther Ruiz-Lucea, Mónica Ibáñez-Barceló, Iván Castellví, Carlos Galisteo, Víctor Quevedo Vila, Enrique Raya, Javier Narváez-García, Lorena Expósito, José A Hernández-Beriaín, Loreto Horcada, Elena Aurrecoechea and Jose M. Pego-Reigosa in Lupus

Introduction Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) have been associated with organ damage and certain features in systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE) patients. Our aim was to investigate the differences between SLE patients according to the presence of aPL and/or clinical antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Materials and methods Patients from the RELESSER-T registry were included. RELESSER-T is a Spanish multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective, SLE registry. Results We included 2398 SLE patients, 1372 of whom were positive for aPL. Overall 1026 patients were classified as SLE, 555 as SLE-APS and817 as SLE-aPL. Regarding cardiovascular risk factors, SLE-APS patients had higher rates of hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes than those with SLE-aPL and SLE ( p Conclusions SLE-APS patients exhibited more severe clinical profiles with higher frequencies of major organ involvement, greater damage accrual and higher mortality than SLE-aPL and SLE patients.

El diagnóstico y tratamiento de las enfermedades autoinmunes sistémicas (EAS) constituye un reto. Aunque infrecuentes, afectan a cientos de miles de pacientes en España. El médico de familia (MF) se enfrenta a síntomas o signos inespecíficos que hacen sospechar EAS al inicio del proceso, y tiene que decidir a quiénes debería derivar. Para facilitar su reconocimiento y mejorar su derivación, expertos de la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria y de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología seleccionaron 26 síntomas/signos-guía y alteraciones analíticas. Se escogieron parejas de MF y reumatólogo para elaborar algoritmos diagnósticos y de derivación. Posteriormente se revisaron y adaptaron al formato de aplicación para móviles (app) descargable. El resultado es el presente documento de derivación de EAS para MF en formato de papel y app. Contiene algoritmos de fácil manejo utilizando datos de la anamnesis, exploración física y pruebas analíticas accesibles en atención primaria para orientar el diagnóstico y facilitar la derivación a reumatología o a otras especialidades. Management of systemic autoimmune diseases is challenging for physicians in their clinical practice. Although not common, they affect thousands of patients in Spain. The family doctor faces patients with symptoms and non-specific cutaneous, mucous, joint, vascular signs or abnormal laboratory findings at the start of the disease process and has to determine when to refer patients to the specialist. To aid in disease detection and better referral, the Spanish Society of Rheumatology and the Spanish Society of Family Medicine has created a group of experts who selected 26 symptoms, key signs and abnormal laboratory findings which were organized by organ and apparatus. Family doctors and rheumatologists with an interest in autoimmune systemic diseases were selected and formed mixed groups of two that then elaborated algorithms for diagnostic guidelines and referral. The algorithms were then reviewed, homogenized and adapted to the algorithm format and application for cell phone (apps) download. The result is the current Referral document of systemic autoimmune diseases for the family doctor in paper format and app (download). It contains easy-to-use algorithms using data from anamnesis, physical examination and laboratory results usually available to primary care, that help diagnose and refer patients to rheumatology or other specialties if needed. Sin financiación No data JCR 2020 0.271 SJR (2020) Q4, 50/58 Rheumatology No data IDR 2020 UEM