Search

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is still an incurable disease, which eventually develops resistance mechanisms against systemic therapies. While most patients experience widespread disease progression during systemic treatment (ST), in some cases, progression may occur at a limited number of metastatic sites. Evidence from other malignancies suggests that local treatment with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) of oligoprogressive disease (OPD) may allow effective disease control without the need to modify ST. Available evidence regarding local treatment of oligoprogressive breast cancer is limited, mostly consisting of retrospective studies. The only randomized data come from the randomized CURB trial, which enrolled patients with oligoprogressive disease, including both small cell lung cancer and breast cancer patients, and did not show a survival benefit from local treatment in the latter group. However, local treatment of oligoprogressive MBC is still considered in clinical practice, especially to delay the switch to more toxic STs. This review aims to identify patients who may benefit from this approach based on the current available knowledge, focusing also on the potential risks associated with the combination of radiotherapy (RT) and ST, as well as on possible future scenarios. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can present with oligometastatic disease and/or develop oligoprogression following systemic therapy. Cytoreductive and focal metastasis-directed therapy options include resection, stereotactic ablative radiation and thermal ablation. Aggressive focal therapy may allow delay in initiation of or modification to systemic therapy and improve clinical outcomes. In this narrative review we synthesize current practice guidelines and prospective data on focal therapy management options and highlight future research. Patient selection and the choice of focal treatment techniques are controversial due to limited and heterogeneous data and patients may benefit from multidisciplinary evaluation. Prospective comparative trials with clearly defined inclusion criteria and relevant end points are needed to clarify the risks and benefits of different approaches. Article highlights Evaluation Oligometastatic and oligoprogressive renal cell carcinoma (RCC) should be evaluated with contrast-enhanced body CT and brain MRI, with additional imaging based on symptoms or as needed for planning of future focal treatments. Guidelines stratify patients by International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) prognostic risk groups (section 4). Management While the quality of the data is mixed, there are myriad options for treating oligometastatic and oligoprogressive RCC, including active surveillance, systemic therapy, focal cytoreductive treatment of the primary and focal metastasis-directed therapy. Optimal patient selection, timing and choice of focal therapy in contemporary clinical practice remains unclear. Discussion of management options for metastasis-directed therapy including surgery, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and thermal ablation should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting (section 7). Follow-up after focal therapy After focal treatment of metastatic disease, current guidelines recommend CT body imaging every 1–6 months with annual history and physical for 5 years. There are no high-quality data on the benefits of systemic therapy after focal treatment of all sites of metastatic disease (section 8). Future directions Multiple ongoing trials are investigating the optimal choice, timing and combination of focal treatment techniques with immunotherapy for oligometastatic and oligoprogressive RCC (section 9). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To investigate whether the addition of radiotherapy could be an appropriate option to delay the time-to-next systemic treatment (TTNsT) in patients with oligoprogressive solid tumors who had acquired or innate resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Material and methods: Patients with oligoprogressive disease treated with ICIs and radiotherapy at our Institute from January 2019 to June 2023 were retrospectively identified. Patients were stratified as primary or secondary immunorefractory according to the time of onset of ICI resistance. TTNsT and Time-To-Resistance (TTR) were the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included: post-radiotherapy first progression-free survival (pR-PFS), Local Control (LC), Overall Survival (OS), and treatment-related toxicities. In addition, out-of-field effects (such as the abscopal effect) of radiotherapy have been hypothesized. The survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and long-rank test. Results: 40 out of 105 screened patients with oligoprogressive disease met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 28 had an acquired drug resistance while 12 had an innate drug resistance. Radiotherapy was offered as a local treatment approach in all patients. RT techniques were classified into three regimens: standard palliative hypofractionated radiotherapy (hypo-RT), stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/SBRT), and lattice radiotherapy (LRT). After a median follow-up of 22.5 months, the median TTR was 4 months (range 3–4) in patients with innate resistance vs 14 months (range 7–36) in patients with acquired resistance. Median TTNsT among patients with acquired and those with innate resistance was not reached (NR) vs 24 months (range 7–72). Overall, only six patients suffered from a local failure. Although out-of-field effects of radiotherapy were hypothesized, we were unable to record them as they did not occur during the observation period. Regardless of the radiation dose, there was no observable ≥ Grade 2 acute or late treatment-related toxicity. Conclusion: Our preliminary results seem to confirm that the integration of radiotherapy and ICIs may allow for the continuation of systemic therapy beyond progression, which can have a subsequent benefit in terms of survival outcomes even in patients with innate resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Aims To investigate whether the addition of radiotherapy could be an appropriate option to delay the time-to-next systemic treatment (TTNsT) in patients with oligoprogressive solid tumors who had acquired or innate resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Material and methods Patients with oligoprogressive disease treated with ICIs and radiotherapy at our Institute from January 2019 to June 2023 were retrospectively identified. Patients were stratified as primary or secondary immunorefractory according to the time of onset of ICI resistance. TTNsT and Time-To-Resistance (TTR) were the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included: post-radiotherapy first progression-free survival (pR-PFS), Local Control (LC), Overall Survival (OS), and treatment-related toxicities. In addition, out-of-field effects (such as the abscopal effect) of radiotherapy have been hypothesized. The survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and long-rank test. Results 40 out of 105 screened patients with oligoprogressive disease met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 28 had an acquired drug resistance while 12 had an innate drug resistance. Radiotherapy was offered as a local treatment approach in all patients. RT techniques were classified into three regimens: standard palliative hypofractionated radiotherapy (hypo-RT), stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/SBRT), and lattice radiotherapy (LRT). After a median follow-up of 22.5 months, the median TTR was 4 months (range 3–4) in patients with innate resistance vs 14 months (range 7–36) in patients with acquired resistance. Median TTNsT among patients with acquired and those with innate resistance was not reached (NR) vs 24 months (range 7–72). Overall, only six patients suffered from a local failure. Although out-of-field effects of radiotherapy were hypothesized, we were unable to record them as they did not occur during the observation period. Regardless of the radiation dose, there was no observable ≥ Grade 2 acute or late treatment-related toxicity. Conclusion Our preliminary results seem to confirm that the integration of radiotherapy and ICIs may allow for the continuation of systemic therapy beyond progression, which can have a subsequent benefit in terms of survival outcomes even in patients with innate resistance.

Abstract Background Standard treatment options for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) include systemic platinum-based chemotherapy, immunotherapy, antibody-drug-conjugates, and targeted therapy. Oligometastatic disease (OMD) may be an intermediate state between localized and generalized cancer. The best treatment strategy for OMD and oligoprogressive (OPD) disease is poorly studied in mUC but local stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) could be an option to avoid or delay systemic treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and feasibility of SBRT given in a real-world patient population. Methods All patients with mUC treated with SBRT at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden between 2009 and 2022 were included in this study. Baseline clinical characteristics, treatment data, SBRT dosimetry data and treatment outcome were collected retrospectively. The study endpoints were local control rate (LCR), progression-free-survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and feasibility of SBRT. Results In total 39 patients were treated with SBRT. The median follow-up was 25.6 months. The LCR was 82%. PFS and OS were 4.1 and 26.2 months, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated; all patients but one (treatment related pain) completed the planned SBRT. Number of metastases irradiated with SBRT was significantly associated with outcome; patients with only one irradiated lesion had more favourable PFS compared to individuals with 2 or more metastases (HR 4.12, 95% CI: 1.81–9.38, p = 0.001). A subgroup of patients (15%) achieved a sustained long-term survival benefit and never required systemic treatments after SBRT. Conclusions SBRT was well tolerated and associated with high LCR. A subpopulation of patients with single metastatic lesion achieved long-term OS and never required subsequent systemic treatment after SBRT. Prospective randomized studies are warranted to discover treatment predictive biomarkers and to investigate the role of SBRT in oligometastatic UC.

Background: Standard treatment options for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) include systemic platinum-based chemotherapy, immunotherapy, antibody-drug-conjugates, and targeted therapy. Oligometastatic disease (OMD) may be an intermediate state between localized and generalized cancer. The best treatment strategy for OMD and oligoprogressive (OPD) disease is poorly studied in mUC but local stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) could be an option to avoid or delay systemic treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and feasibility of SBRT given in a real-world patient population. Methods: All patients with mUC treated with SBRT at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden between 2009 and 2022 were included in this study. Baseline clinical characteristics, treatment data, SBRT dosimetry data and treatment outcome were collected retrospectively. The study endpoints were local control rate (LCR), progression-free-survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and feasibility of SBRT. Results: In total 39 patients were treated with SBRT. The median follow-up was 25.6 months. The LCR was 82%. PFS and OS were 4.1 and 26.2 months, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated; all patients but one (treatment related pain) completed the planned SBRT. Number of metastases irradiated with SBRT was significantly associated with outcome; patients with only one irradiated lesion had more favourable PFS compared to individuals with 2 or more metastases (HR 4.12, 95% CI: 1.81–9.38, p = 0.001). A subgroup of patients (15%) achieved a sustained long-term survival benefit and never required systemic treatments after SBRT. Conclusions: SBRT was well tolerated and associated with high LCR. A subpopulation of patients with single metastatic lesion achieved long-term OS and never required subsequent systemic treatment after SBRT. Prospective randomized studies are warranted to discover treatment predictive biomarkers and to investigate the role of SBRT in oligometastatic UC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We examine the potential for curative approaches among metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients by exploring the recent literature on local ablative therapies like surgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with oligometastatic (OM) breast cancer. We also cover therapies for MBC patients with oligoprogressive (OP) disease. Key Findings: Surgery and SBRT have been studied for OM and OP breast cancer, mainly in retrospective or non-randomized trials. While many studies demonstrated favorable results, a cooperative study and single-institution trial found no support for surgery/SBRT in OM and OP cases, respectively. Conclusion: While there is interest in applying local therapies to OM and OP breast cancer, the current randomized data does not back the routine use of surgery or SBRT, particularly when considering the potential for treatment-related toxicities. Future research should refine patient selection through advanced imaging and possibly explore these therapies specifically in patients with hormone receptor-positive or HER2-positive disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Given the positive results from recent randomized controlled trials in patients with oligometastatic, oligoprogressive, or oligoresidual disease, the role of radiotherapy has expanded in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While small metastatic lesions are commonly treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), treatment of the primary tumor and involved regional lymph nodes may require prolonged fractionation schedules to ensure safety especially when treating larger volumes in proximity to critical organs-at-risk (OARs). We have developed an institutional MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgRT) workflow for these patients. We present a 71-year-old patient with stage IV NSCLC with oligoprogression of the primary tumor and associated regional lymph nodes in which MR-guided, online adaptive radiotherapy was performed, prescribing 60 Gy in 15 fractions. We describe our workflow, dosimetric constraints, and daily dosimetric comparisons for the critical OARs (esophagus, trachea, and proximal bronchial tree [PBT] maximum doses [D 0.03cc ]), in comparison to the original treatment plan recalculated on the anatomy of the day (i.e., predicted doses). During MRgRT, few fractions met the original dosimetric objectives: 6.6% for esophagus, 6.6% for PBT, and 6.6% for trachea. Online adaptive radiotherapy reduced the cumulative doses to the structures by 11.34%, 4.2%, and 5.62% when comparing predicted plan summations to the final delivered summation. Therefore, this case study presets a workflow and treatment paradigm for accelerated hypofractionated MRgRT due to the significant variations in daily dose to the central thoracic OARs to reduce treatment-related toxicity associated with radiotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate the ability of radiotherapy (RT) to prolong progression-free survival (PFS) and to report treatment-related toxicities among oligoprogressive metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC) patients on avelumab. Methods: We retrospectively collected clinical data on mMCC patients who underwent radiotherapy for limited progression on avelumab. Patients were categorized as primary or secondary immune refractory depending on the time of onset of resistance to immunotherapy (at the first or subsequent follow-up visits after avelumab initiation). Pre- and post-RT PFS were calculated. Overall survival (OS) from the first progression treated with RT was also reported. Radiological responses and toxicities were evaluated according to the irRECIST criteria and RTOG scoring system, respectively. Results: Eight patients, including five females, with a median age of 75 years, met our inclusion criteria. The median gross tumor and clinical target volumes at first progression on avelumab were 29.85 cc and 236.7 cc, respectively. The treatment sites included lymph node, skin, brain, and spine metastases. Four patients received more than one course of RT. Most patients were treated with palliative radiation doses (mainly 30 Gy in 3 Gy/day fractions). Two patients were treated with stereotactic RT. Five/eight patients were primary immune refractory. The objective response rate at the first post-RT assessment was 75%, whereas no local failure was reported. The median pre-RT PFS was 3 months. The pre-RT PFS was 37.5% at 6 months and 12.5% at 1 year. The median post-RT PFS was not reached. The post-RT PFS was 60% at 6 months and 1 year. The post-RT OS was 85.7% at 1 year and 64.3% at 2 years. No relevant treatment-related toxicity was observed. After a median follow-up of 18.5 months, 6/8 patients are still alive and continuing on avelumab therapy. Conclusions: Adding radiotherapy to mMCC patients with limited progression on avelumab seems to be safe and effective in prolonging the successful use of immunotherapy, regardless of the type of immune refractoriness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tanju Berber,1 Abdullah Sakin2 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; 2Department of Medical Oncology, Medipol University, Bahçelievler Medipol Hospital, Istanbul, TurkeyCorrespondence: Tanju Berber, Department of Radiation Oncology, Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, 34307, Turkey, Tel +0905324111202, Email tanjuberber@hotmail.comAim: To extend the survival of patients by providing local control of metastases in oligoresistance/oligoprogressive disease.Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) applied to 30 lesions in the lungs of 19 patients who were considered inoperable by the tumor board upon the development of oligoresistance/oligoprogressive lung metastasis while undergoing chemotherapy between January 2016 and December 2017. Each patient had one to five metastases in their lungs. The median SBRT biologic effective dose at α/β of 10 (BED10) was 180.0 (IQR: 115.5– 180.0) Gy.Results: We obtained effective, low-toxicity results. The rates of local control were 89.4%, 84.2%, and 78.9% for the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd years, respectively. The median local control time was 4 (IQR: 3– 6) months. The median overall survival (OS) was 36.3 (IQR: 29.7– 42.9) months. The rates of OS for the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd years were 89.5%, 73.7%, and 61.4%, respectively. Despite the nonoccurrence of grade 4– 5 toxicity in the lungs, six (31.6%) patients had grade 1– 3 pulmonary pneumonia, one patient had a grade 4 skin ulceration, and two patients had increased chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the follow-up period.Discussion: In patients with oligometastatic lung tumors, SBRT is very effective in terms of progression-free survival and OS.Keywords: lung metastasis, stereotactic body radiation therapy, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy, oligometastatic, oligoprogressive, oligoresistance, pallation

Purpose of Review: Advances in radiotherapy technology have allowed for highly conformal, high-dose stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to be delivered in just 1–5 fractions, which opened a plethora of new treatment options for both early-stage and metastatic breast cancer (BC). This review discusses recent studies and ongoing trials for SBRT in BC. Recent Findings: In early-stage BC, adjuvant accelerated and ultra-hypofractionated radiation now have high-quality evidence showing similar outcomes compared to moderately hypofractionated radiation. Studies are also investigating the role of neoadjuvant and definitive SBRT for early-stage BC. In oligometastatic disease, randomized evidence shows improved outcomes when SBRT is combined with systemic therapy, and multiple BC-specific trials are attempting to elucidate optimal patient selection and treatment regimens. While SBRT for oligoprogression has shown mixed findings, the synergy of immunologic changes and improving systemic therapies is likely to enhance treatment efficacy in the future. Summary: Outcomes of recent SBRT trials show favorable results across a multitude of BC stages. By highlighting existing and ongoing trials, we hope to improve the availability of SBRT for BC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer, accounting for most renal cancers. Oligoprogressive RCC (OP-RCC) describes metastatic RCC wherein one or a few metastatic sites continue to progress, while the majority of metastatic sites are stable on systemic therapy. Treatment options for the primary site for OP-RCC include cytoreductive nephrectomy, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), or ablative techniques, although there is no currently agreed-upon standard for treatment. This report describes a 76-year-old male with OP-RCC who was treated with salvage SBRT after failing cytoablation therapy. A review of the current literature on SBRT as a treatment option for OP-RCC is presented and discussed. This case demonstrates that SBRT may be a viable salvage treatment option for patients with OP-RCC that provides good local disease control while preserving long-term renal function., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Heger et al.)

Although systemic therapy represents the standard of care for polymetastatic kidney cancer, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) may play a relevant role in the oligometastatic setting. We conducted a multicenter study including oligometastatic kidney cancer treated with SBRT. We retrospectively analyzed 207 patients who underwent 245 SBRT treatments on 385 lesions, including 165 (42.9%) oligorecurrent (OR) and 220 (57.1%) oligoprogressive (OP) lesions. Most common sites were lung (30.9%) for OR group, and bone (32.7%) for OP group. Among 78 (31.8%) patients receiving concomitant systemic therapy, sunitinib (61.5%) and pazopanib (15.4%) were the most common for OR patients, while sunitinib (49.2%) and nivolumab (20.0%) for OP patients. End points were local control (LC), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to next systemic therapy (TTNS) and toxicity. Median follow-up was 18.6 months. 1, 2 and 3-year LC rates were 89.4%, 80.1% and 76.6% in OR patients, and 82.7%, 76.9% and 64.3% in those with OP, respectively. LC for OP group was influenced by clear cell histology (p = 0.000), total number of lesions (p = 0.004), systemic therapy during SBRT (p = 0.012), and SBRT dose (p = 0.012). Median PFS was 37.9 months. 1, 2- and 3-year OS was 92.7%, 86.4% and 81.8%, respectively. Median TTNS was 15.8 months for OR patients, and 13.9 months for OP patients. No grade 3 or higher toxicities were reported for both groups. SBRT may be considered an effective safe option in the multidisciplinary management of both OR and OP metastases from kidney cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent findings from literature evidenced that metastatic prostate cancer often shows heterogeneous response to therapy, with persistent sensibility to systemic treatments after biochemical, clinical, or radiographic progression. This highlights the advantage of integrated approaches in which local ablative treatments (e.g., stereotactic body radiation therapy) could prolong clinical benefit of systemic therapies beyond oligo-progression. Of course, development of predictive biomarker could be helpful in order to select patients who could much benefit from this treatment strategy. Circulating tumor cell detection and analysis could also have a crucial role in this field. A joint effort of two prospective ongoing trials (ARTO, clinical.gov identifier NCT03449719 and PRIMERA, clinical.gov identifier NCT04188275) might help to improve criteria to select patients in whom a local ablative approach might confer significant benefit. In this commentary, we summarized recent data from literature to support this thesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) use has increased overtime for the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients, with a likely good control of irradiated lesions. We planned a retrospective multicenter Italian study, with the aim of investigating the outcome of treatment with SBRT for non-brain secondary lesions in mRCC patients. Methods: all consecutive metastatic non-brain lesions from mRCC that underwent SBRT at nine Italian institutions from January 2015 to June 2017 were considered. The primary endpoint of the study was the lesion-PFS, calculated from SBRT initiation to the local progression of the irradiated lesion. Results: 57 extracranial metastatic lesions from 48 patients with primary mRCC were treated with SBRT. At the median follow-up of 26.4 months, the median lesion-PFS was not reached (43 censored); 72.4% of lesions were progression-free at 40 months, with significantly better lesion-PFS for small metastatic lesions (

Background: Progressive, metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) often requires the initiation of new systemic therapy. However, in patients with NSCLC that is oligoprogressive (≤3 lesions), local radiotherapy (RT) may allow for the eradication of resistant microclones and, therefore, the continuation of otherwise effective systemic therapy.Methods: Patients treated from 2008 to 2019 with definitive doses of RT to all sites of intracranial or extracranial oligoprogression without a change in systemic therapy were identified. Radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and time to new therapy (TNT) were measured. Associations between baseline clinical and treatment-related variables were correlated with progression-free survival via Cox proportional hazards modeling.Results: Among 198 unique patients, 253 oligoprogressive events were identified. Intracranial progression occurred in 51% of the patients, and extracranial progression occurred in 49%. In the entire cohort, the median rPFS was 7.9 months (95% CI, 6.5-10.0 months), and the median TNT was 8.8 months (95% CI, 7.2-10.9 months). On adjusted modeling, patients with the following disease characteristics were associated with better rPFS: better performance status (P = .003), fewer metastases (P = .03), longer time to oligoprogression (P = .009), and fewer previous systemic therapies (P = .02). Having multiple sites of oligoprogression was associated with worse rPFS (P < .001).Conclusions: In select patients with oligoprogression, definitive RT is a feasible treatment option to delay the initiation of next-line systemic therapies, which have more limited response rates and efficacy. Further randomized prospective data may help to validate these findings and identify which patients are most likely to benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The aim of this paper was to perform a narrative review of the literature on the available approaches in the treatment of two emerging subpopulations of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients: the oligometastatic disease (less than 5 metastasis) and the oligoprogressive disease, defined as worsening in maximum 3-5 sites while all other tumor sites are controlled by systemic therapy.Areas Covered: We explore all possible approaches in these settings of patients: the role of local therapies, considering both surgical metastasectomy and/or ablative techniques, the efficacy of systemic therapies and the rationale behind active surveillance. We also discuss ongoing clinical trials in these settings.Expert Opinion: Two different strategies are emerging as the most promising for the approach to the oligometastatic/oligoprogressive mRCC patient: (1) the use of immunocheckpoint inhibitors following metastasectomy; (2) the use of stereotactic radiotherapy alone or combined with immunotherapy for oligometastatic disease. The lack of validated biomarkers of response in these mRCC patient subpopulations is opening the way to the employment of novel technologies. Among them, the use of artificial intelligence seems to be the candidate to contribute to precision oncology in patients with mRCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• 26 central (19 ultra-central) oligo-metastases were treated by isotoxic 5-fraction SMART • Adaptive replanning was indicated in 96% to meet OAR metrics and/or target coverage • With median follow-up of 17 months, 1-year local control rate was 96 % • Limited toxicity was observed with 4 % acute G3 and no late G2 + toxicity • Isotoxic SMART may widen the therapeutic window for high-risk thoracic tumors Central/ultra-central thoracic tumors are challenging to treat with stereotactic radiotherapy due potential high-grade toxicity. Stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) may improve the therapeutic window through motion control with breath-hold gating and real-time MR-imaging as well as the option for daily online adaptive replanning to account for changes in target and/or organ-at-risk (OAR) location. 26 central (19 ultra-central) thoracic oligoprogressive/oligometastatic tumors treated with isotoxic (OAR constraints-driven) 5-fraction SMART (median 50 Gy, range 35–60) between 10/2019–10/2022 were reviewed. Central tumor was defined as tumor within or touching 2 cm around proximal tracheobronchial tree (PBT) or adjacent to mediastinal/pericardial pleura. Ultra-central was defined as tumor abutting the PBT, esophagus, or great vessel. Hard OAR constraints observed were ≤ 0.03 cc for PBT V40, great vessel V52.5, and esophagus V35. Local failure was defined as tumor progression/recurrence within the planning target volume. Tumor abutted the PBT in 31 %, esophagus in 31 %, great vessel in 65 %, and heart in 42 % of cases. 96 % of fractions were treated with reoptimized plan, necessary to meet OAR constraints (80 %) and/or target coverage (20 %). Median follow-up was 19 months (27 months among surviving patients). Local control (LC) was 96 % at 1-year and 90 % at 2-years (total 2/26 local failure). 23 % had G2 acute toxicities (esophagitis, dysphagia, anorexia, nausea) and one (4 %) had G3 acute radiation dermatitis. There were no G4-5 acute toxicities. There was no symptomatic pneumonitis and no G2 + late toxicities. Isotoxic 5-fraction SMART resulted in high rates of LC and minimal toxicity. This approach may widen the therapeutic window for high-risk oligoprogressive/oligometastatic thoracic tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: SCLC is the most aggressive lung cancer histology with a 5-year OS <10%. At the diagnosis, almost two-thirds of the SCLC an Extended Disease presentation. Two randomized studies (CASPIAN and ImPower133) demonstrated an OS improvement, when immunotherapy was prescribed as maintenance therapy after standard chemotherapy. To date, SABR has had a limited indication in managing metastatic SCLC, although recent reports proposed it as a valid treatment option in selected patients. We propose a retrospective multicentric analysis of patients treated with SABR for oligometastatic SCLC., Method: Data of patients affected by oligometastatic-SCLC treated with SABR between 2017 and 2022 in 11 Italian centers were collected. Clinical and therapeutic variables together with OS and time to next treatment were analyzed. Univariate analysis with Kaplan-Meier curve were calculated, and log-rank test were applied. Cox proportional hazard model was used for multivariate analysis., Results: Data from 93 patients and 132 metastatic lesions were analyzed. The median age was 64 years (36-86) and all but 1 had Performance Status 0 or 1. Fifty-two patients presented ED at diagnosis. The first line treatment was radiochemotherapy in 42%, CHT alone in 24% and CHT-IO in 28%, others treatment accounts for 4% and only 2% of patients underwent best supportive care. Of the 132 lesions treated with SBRT 55 were in brain, 27 in lung, 11 in liver, 10 in lymph nodes, 8 in bones and 20 in adrenal gland. Median OS was 14 months, 1 year-OS and 2 years OS were 53% and 27%, respectively. The median TtNT was 14 months for the entire population. Of all the analyzed variables only, the anatomical site of the metastases and their number showed statistical significance in the univariate analysist, confirmed in the subsequent multivariate., Conclusion: SABR seems to play a role in delaying further systemic lines in oligometastatic disease and to extend the use of ongoing treatment in oligoprogressive state. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To investigate the role of radiotherapy (RT) in the management of EGFR- or ALK-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with TKI. Materials and methods: Clinical data of 106 patients (pts) from five Institutions treated with RT concomitant to TKI were retrospectively revised. Overall survival (OS) and toxicities were analyzed as endpoints of the study. Results: Median age of pts was 65 years. TKIs were given for EGFR (81%)- or ALK (19%)-mutated metastatic NSCLC. Stereotactic RT (SRT) was delivered to 49 pts (46%). Patients with four or less metastasis were defined as oligometastatic/oligoprogressive (OM/OP); sites of RT were brain, bone, lung or others in 46%, 27%, 14% and 13%, respectively. Median OS was 23 months. At univariate analysis SRT, ECOG PS 0–1, OM/OP disease, lung sites and a TKI duration longer than median favorably affected OS (all p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed SRT (HR 0.355, CI 95% 0.212–0.595; p < 0.001) and median duration of TKI > 14 months (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.10–0.30; p < 0.001) as independent factors related to better OS. Toxicities were rare. Conclusions: SRT seems to positively affect OS with limited toxicity in selected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oligometastatic prostate cancer represents an intermediate state between a localized tumor and widespread metastatic disease. Its specific clinical features suggest the existence of a distinct biology which still needs to be elucidated. New imaging techniques like prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET scans have shown to perform well in the staging and restaging of this category of patients, at different phases of disease evolution. Despite limited prospective evidence, metastasis-directed therapies (MDT) are emerging as valid treatment options able to postpone systemic therapies and probably improve survival outcome. The aim of this review is to shed light on the clinical scenario of prostate cancer patients with limited metastatic disease burden and highlight the role of MDT strategies in this setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patrick J Richard, Ramesh Rengan Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA Abstract: The oligometastatic disease theory was initially described in 1995 by Hellman and Weichselbaum. Since then, much work has been performed to investigate its existence in many solid tumors. This has led to subclassifications of stage IV cancer, which could redefine our treatment approaches and the therapeutic outcomes for this historically “incurable” entity. With a high incidence of stage IV disease, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a difficult cancer to treat and cure. Recent work has proven the existence of an oligometastatic state in NSCLC in terms of properly selecting patients who may benefit from aggressive therapy and experience long-term overall survival. This review discusses the current treatment approaches used in oligometastatic NSCLC and provides the evidence and rationale for each approach. The prognostic factors of many trials are discussed, which can be used to properly select patients for aggressive treatment regimens. Future advances in both molecular profiling of NSCLC to find targetable mutations and investigating patient selection may increase the number of patients diagnosed with oligometastatic NSCLC. As this disease entity increases, it is of utmost importance for oncologists treating NSCLC to be aware of the current treatment strategies that exist and the potential advantages/disadvantages of each. Keywords: oligometastatic, non-small-cell lung cancer, oligoprogressive, treatment

Context: Although the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has been revolutionized by the advent of new systemic agents, still few patients experience a long-term durable response. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is nowadays commonly used as metastasis-directed therapy (MDT), but limited data exist on how best to implement this strategy as part of a multimodal approach., Objective: To evaluate the potential role of extracranial SABR in mRCC and to identify future therapeutic developments of SABR in different disease settings., Evidence Acquisition: A systematic review was conducted in May 2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement on the PubMed database. Thirty-four studies were selected for inclusion in this systematic review., Evidence Synthesis: SABR has been used with four main goals: (1) eradication of the whole metastatic burden in synchronous and metachronous oligometastatic patients, resulting in a long-term local control (LC) rate of >90% and median progression-free survival (PFS) ranging between 8 and 15 mo; (2) eradication of oligoprogressive lesions, enabling an extension of the duration of the systemic therapy by approximately 9 mo; (3) improvement of the response to systemic therapy in polymetastatic patients, resulting in an overall response rate ranging from 17% to 56%; and (4) cytoreduction in polymetastatic mRCC patients, with LC rates ranging between 71% and 100%, and preservation of the renal function, but unclear PFS and overall survival impact. Overall, the combination of SABR and systemic agents has been associated with overall good tolerance, with grade ≥3 toxicity ranging from 0% to 13%., Conclusions: Current data highlight the role of SABR as an emerging MDT treatment option in both oligometastatic and oligoprogressive extracranial mRCC, able to ensure long-term disease control and delay the use of next-line systemic therapies. The use of SABR for cytoreduction in the de novo metastatic disease and as an immunological booster in the polymetastatic setting remains investigational and warrants further investigations., Patient Summary: Radiotherapy delivered with ablative doses (>6 Gy per fraction) is a promising treatment strategy for patients diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Excellent outcome results have been observed in patients with a limited number of metastases, improving metastasis-free survival by several months. For patients with a few metastases progressing under systemic therapy, radiotherapy allows an extension of the duration of the ongoing therapy by several months., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Available therapies for castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) confer minimal survival advantage; thus, there is interest in metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) for oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease to improve outcomes. Here, we describe outcomes of oligoprogressive CRPC treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)., Objective: To report outcomes of oligoprogressive CRPC treated with MDT using SABR., Design, Setting, and Participants: Patients with oligoprogressive CRPC were retrospectively evaluated, and outcomes following MDT were reported. Outcomes were additionally compared with oligoprogressive CRPC treated with change in systemic therapy alone., Intervention: SABR to oligoprogressive lesions., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Outcomes of interest were time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure, time to next intervention (TTNI), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariable analysis and multivariable analysis (MVA) were performed., Results and Limitations: A total of 68 patients were included. After MDT, median time to PSA recurrence, TTNI, and DMFS were 9.7, 15.6, and 10.8 months, respectively. A total of 112 lesions were treated, and the cumulative incidences of local failure at 12 and 24 months were 2.1% and 13.8%, respectively. Factors associated with the risk of local recurrence on univariable analysis were age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.07, p =  0.03) and Gleason grade group (HR 2.20, p =  0.07). Compared with change in systemic therapy alone (n = 52), MDT (n = 31) was associated with improved median time to PSA failure (9.7 vs 4.2 months, p =  0.066)), TTNI (14.9 vs 8.8 months, p =  0.025), and DMFS (12.7 vs 8.9 months, p = 0.045), and remained associated with improved outcomes on MVA., Conclusions: In a retrospective cohort of oligoprogressive CRPC patients, MDT was associated with favorable outcomes and improved cancer control as compared with change in systemic treatment alone. Future prospective trials are needed to confirm these findings., Patient Summary: In this report, we retrospectively analyzed outcomes of patients with oligoprogressive castrate-resistant prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy to progressing lesions. Our results suggest that treatment of these lesions with radiation therapy can result in sustained periods of disease-free survival and might add benefit in addition to systemic therapy at the time of progression. These results need to be verified in a prospective trial to identify the optimal integration of radiation therapy into metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer., (Copyright © 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Non-small cell lung cancer with very limited extent of metastatic spread commonly is termed, oligometastatic disease (OMD), and typically described as no more than 3 to 5 lesions. Definitive local therapy potentially leads to significant improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival. OMD may occur de novo prior to initiation of systemic therapy or as an induced state after initiation of systemic therapy. Although prospective data are limited to small trials, they have consistently supported local therapy as an appropriate consideration if not a clear standard of care for well-selected patients. Several trials in OMD are ongoing., Competing Interests: Disclosure The author has nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa) is an intense area of research thanks to the development of novel PET tracers such as 18 F-choline or 68 Ga-PSMA. Several retrospective studies in patients with hormone-sensitive oligorecurrent PCa (usually up to 5 metastases with a controlled primary tumor) showed PSA response and a low toxicity profile of metastasis-directed therapies (MDT) such as Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) or salvage lymph node dissection. More recently, randomized phase 2 studies showed that SBRT can delay the introduction of androgen deprivation, decrease biochemical relapses and increase overall survival. Regarding oligoprogressive metastatic castration-resistant PCa, limited data is however available. Based on these studies the European Association of Urology and the American Society of Radiotherapy EAU now recommend using MDT instead of observation. Several studies are undergoing in France and worldwide in order to confirm the exact role of MDT., (Copyright © 2020 Société Française du Cancer. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.)

Objectives: stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) use has increased overtime for the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients, with a likely good control of irradiated lesions. We planned a retrospective multicenter Italian study, with the aim of investigating the outcome of treatment with SBRT for non-brain secondary lesions in mRCC patients., Methods: all consecutive metastatic non-brain lesions from mRCC that underwent SBRT at nine Italian institutions from January 2015 to June 2017 were considered. The primary endpoint of the study was the lesion-PFS, calculated from SBRT initiation to the local progression of the irradiated lesion., Results: 57 extracranial metastatic lesions from 48 patients with primary mRCC were treated with SBRT. At the median follow-up of 26.4 months, the median lesion-PFS was not reached (43 censored); 72.4% of lesions were progression-free at 40 months, with significantly better lesion-PFS for small metastatic lesions (<14 mm). SBRT was safe and the 1-year local disease control was 87.7%. After SBRT, 18 patients (37.5%) permanently interrupted systemic therapy., Conclusions: consistently with the previous literature, our findings support the use of SBRT in selected mRCC patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest M. Bersanelli received research funding from Seqirus, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) and Novartis and honoraria for advisory role and as speaker at scientific events from BMS, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre and Pfizer. S. Buti received research funding from Novartis and honoraria for advisory role and as speaker at scientific events from Pfizer, BMS, IPSEN, Pierre-Fabre, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), AstraZeneca. G. Procopio received honoraria for advisory role from Bayer, BMS, Ipsen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer. All other authors declared no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) exists on a spectrum, with a subset of patients presenting with oligometastatic disease involving only a limited number of distant sites. For these patients, local consolidative therapy (LCT) has been demonstrated to improve outcomes through ablation or cytoreduction of metastatic disease, as shown in an increasing number of randomized controlled trials. In particular, stereotactic ablative body radiation (SABR) has emerged as a feasible treatment modality for elimination of oligometastatic sites. This focused review examines the underlying biologic mechanisms and clinical data in support of SABR in the setting of oligometastatic NSCLC. Following a comprehensive evaluation of the pertinent retrospective, prospective, and anticipated trials to date, we summarize the evidence regarding patient selection, treatment safety, and technical considerations to provide guidance of this approach for clinicians., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: Note that portions of this review have been previously published in the textbook Adult Chest Surgery, 3rd Edition, “The Role of Surgery in Oligometastatic Disease.”

Oligometastatic disease is defined as an intermediate state between localized and widespread metastatic disease. Given that in the oligometastatic state gross tumors represent the full extent of disease, there may be a role for curative local therapy despite metastatic disease. As nearly 60% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with metastatic disease and another 45% of patients with initially localized disease will ultimately develop distant metastases, NSCLC represents a prime disease for aggressive intervention. In this review, the definition, prognostic factors, patient selection, rationale and evidence for treatment of oligoprogressive and oligometastatic NSCLC is discussed, including recent prospective trials and future directions., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer carries a dismal prognosis. However, the recognition of the predictive value of activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and the availability of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has markedly improved the prognosis of these patients, because treatment with these inhibitors induces rapid and robust responses. Unfortunately, the responses are not durable and resistance inevitably occurs after a median of 9 to 14 months. Although the management of resistant patients who harbor EGFR mutations is rapidly evolving, there are no conclusive guidelines regarding this issue. However, palliative cytotoxic chemotherapy is considered the standard of care for these patients. The elucidation of the mechanisms of acquired resistance has led to efforts to personalize the treatment approach. Promising results from early clinical trials using the third-generation inhibitors that specifically target the most common mechanism of resistance, the gatekeeper T790M mutation, provide the basis to look to the future with cautious optimism. Moreover, it has been shown that in some cases of oligoprogressive disease, aggressively treating all metastatic sites while continuing the targeted treatment could improve outcomes. Herein, we review the treatment strategies being evaluated that will shape the future management of these patients., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)