Search

A suitable diagnostic classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias requires testing for a large number of molecular biomarkers. Next-generation sequencing is a technology able to integrate identification of the vast majority of them in a single test. This manuscript includes the design, analytical validation and clinical feasibility evaluation of a molecular diagnostic kit for onco-hematological diseases. It is based on sequencing of the coding regions of 76 genes (seeking single-nucleotide variants, small insertions or deletions and CNVs), as well as the search for fusions in 27 target genes. The kit has also been designed to detect large CNVs throughout the genome by including specific probes and employing a custom bioinformatics approach. The analytical and clinical feasibility validation of the Haematology OncoKitDx panel has been carried out from the sequencing of 170 patient samples from 6 hospitals (in addition to the use of commercial reference samples). The analytical validation showed sensitivity and specificity close to 100% for all the parameters evaluated, with a detection limit of 2% for SNVs and SVs, and 20% for CNVs. Clinically relevant mutations were detected in 94% of all patients. An analysis of the correlation between the genetic risk classification of AML (according to ELN 2017) established by the hospitals and that obtained by the Haematology OncoKitDx panel showed an almost perfect correlation (K = 0.94). Among the AML samples with a molecular diagnosis, established by the centers according to the WHO, the Haematology OncoKitDx analysis showed the same result in 97% of them. The panel was able to adequately differentiate between MPN subtypes and also detected alterations that modified the diagnosis (FIP1L1-PDGFRA). Likewise, the cytogenetic risk derived from the CNV plot generated by the NGS panel correlated substantially with the results of the conventional karyotype (K = 0.71) among MDS samples. In addition, the panel detected the main biomarkers of prognostic value among patients with ALL. This validated solution enables a reliable analysis of a large number of molecular biomarkers from a DNA sample in a single assay., This research was funded by Imegen (Instituto de Medicina Genómica, Paterna, Spain).

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) represents the best therapeutic option for many patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, relapse remains the main cause of mortality after transplantation. The detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) in AML, before and after HSCT, has been described as a powerful predictor of outcome. Nevertheless, multicenter and standardized studies are lacking. A retrospective analysis was performed, including 295 AML patients undergoing HSCT in 4 centers that worked according to recommendations from the Euroflow consortium. Among patients in complete remission (CR), MRD levels prior to transplantation significantly influenced outcomes, with overall (OS) and leukemia free survival (LFS) at 2 years of 76.7% and 67.6% for MRD-negative patients, 68.5% and 49.7% for MRD-low patients (MRD < 0.1), and 50.5% and 36.6% for MRD-high patients (MRD ≥ 0.1) (p < 0.001), respectively. MRD level did influence the outcome, irrespective of the conditioning regimen. In our patient cohort, positive MRD on day +100 after transplantation was associated with an extremely poor prognosis, with a cumulative incidence of relapse of 93.3%. In conclusion, our multicenter study confirms the prognostic value of MRD performed in accordance with standardized recommendations.

Background: Evaluation of MRD is standard in patients with AML. However, the role of decentralized MRD assessment for risk stratification in AML remains largely unknown, and so it does which methodological aspects are critical to empower the evaluation of MRD with prognostic significance, particularly if using MFC. Aim: To evaluate the role of decentralized MRD assessment using MFC for risk stratification and putative treatment individualization of patients with AML. Methods: This study was performed on 1,076 AML patients in complete remission (CR) after 7+3 induction chemotherapy, in whom MRD was evaluated by MFC in local laboratories over a period of 20 years in the PETHEMA group. We conducted a survey of technical aspects of MFC based MRD testing in the laboratories of the 60 participating Hospitals, to determine the impact of methodological heterogeneity in the prognostic value of MFC. Results: We first investigated the most effective MRD cutoff to stratify patients' risk at first remission. Patients were segmented into progressively higher cutoffs, starting at 0.01% followed by 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.5% and 1%. Our results showed that 0.1% reached higher statistical significance to discriminate patients with different relapse-free survival (RFS, HR: 0.77; P = .001) and overall survival (OS, HR: 0.73; P = .001). In multivariate analyses together with patients' age, WBC, genetic risk and post-consolidation therapy, MRD status was selected as an independent prognostic factor for OS. To further define the utility of "real-world" MRD assessment using MFC in risk stratification of AML, recursive partitioning was performed using the prognostic and treatment related factors selected in the multivariate Cox model for OS. Of the four variables evaluated, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT, regardless of autologous or allogeneic source) vs no transplant emerged as the best single discriminator for OS, followed by genetic risk, age and MRD status. There were two branching points defined by MRD status; the first in patients ≤60 years with intermediate genetic risk who were not transplanted and the second in patients with adverse genetics who were not transplanted, in whom Forty-nine of the 60 hospitals (82%) responded to the survey on questions regarding the measurement of MRD using MFC in the PETHEMA LMA 1999, 2007 and 2010 protocols, providing information corresponding to 966 of the 1,076 (90%) patients regarding the number of markers, preparation of samples, instruments, approach (ie, LAIP, DfN or LAIP+DfN), number of cells to define a cluster, etc. The survey revealed significant heterogeneity intra- and inter-protocols that reflected improvement in MFC assessment of MRD over time, in the absence of harmonization nor standardization at the national level. Accordingly, we investigated if the heterogeneity in methodological, interpretation and reporting aspects of MFC based MRD testing were hampering its ability to predict outcome independently of other patient and treatment related factors. Strikingly, our results showed that except for the denominator used to calculate MRD burden (ie, total nucleated cells vs leukocytes), lack of standardization in all other parameters had an impact on the ability of MFC to predict outcomes in AML (Figure). Namely, panels with ≤4 markers or ≤2 combinations failed to identify patients with significantly different RFS according to MRD status, and MFC-based MRD monitoring was prognostic only when >500,000 cells were measured. Only MRD assessment using patient-specific panels was predictive of outcome. Conclusions: We report here one of the largest studies investigating the role of MRD monitoring using MFC. Our results confirmed that detection of MRD identifies patients in CR/CRi with inferior survival, but uncovered that decentralized MRD testing lacks significance when compared to other baseline risk factors and in the context of risk-adapted post-consolidation strategies. Thus, while this study demonstrated that "real-world" decentralized assessment of MRD using MFC does provide prognostic information in AML patients at first remission, our results question its readiness for risk stratification towards clinical decisions outside trials, at least until adequate standardization of this technique is achieved. Figure Disclosures Paiva: SkylineDx: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Adaptive: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Alonso Dominguez:Celgene: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Martinez-Lopez:Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Altum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties; Hosea: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Vivia Biotech: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Sossa:Astellas: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Novo: Honoraria. San-Miguel:Roche, AbbVie, GlaxoSmithKline, and Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Novartis, Takeda, Amgen, MSD, Janssen, and Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia‐related changes (AML‐MRC) are poor outcome leukemias. Its diagnosis is based on clinical, cytogenetic, and cytomorphologic criteria, last criterion being sometimes difficult to assess. A high frequency of ASXL1 mutations have been described in this leukemia. We sequenced ASXL1 gene mutations in 61 patients with AML‐MRC and 46 controls with acute myeloid leukemia without other specifications (AML‐NOS) to identify clinical, cytomorphologic, and cytogenetic characteristics associated with ASXL1 mutational status. Mutated ASXL1 (ASXL1+) was observed in 31% of patients with AML‐MRC compared to 4.3% in AML‐NOS. Its presence in AML‐MRC was associated with older age, a previous history of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN), leukocytosis, presence of micromegakaryocytes in bone marrow, lower number of blasts in bone marrow, myelomonocytic/monocytic morphological features and normal karyotype. ASXL1 mutation was not observed in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome‐related cytogenetic abnormalities or TP53 mutations. Differences in terms of overall survival were found only in AML‐MRC patients without prior MDS or MDS/MPN and with intermediate‐risk karyotype, having ASXL1+ patients a worst outcome than ASXL1−. We conclude that the ASXL1 mutation frequency is high in AML‐MRC patients being its presence associated with specific characteristics including morphological signs of dysplasia. This association raises the possible role of ASXL1 as a surrogate marker in AML‐MRC, which could facilitate the diagnosis of patients within this group when the karyotype is normal, and especially when the assessment of multilineage dysplasia morphologically is difficult. This mutation could be used as a worst outcome marker in de novo AML‐MRC with intermediate‐risk karyotype., The ASXL1 mutation frequency is high in AML‐MRC patients being its presence associated with specific characteristics, including morphological signs of dysplasia. This association raises the possible role of ASXL1 as a surrogate marker in AML‐MRC, which could facilitate the diagnosis of patients within this group when the karyotype is normal, and especially when the assessment of multilineage dysplasia morphologically is difficult. This mutation could be used as a worst outcome marker in de novo AML‐MRC with intermediate‐risk karyotype.

Objective MLL gene is involved in more than 80 known genetic fusions in acute leukemia. To study the relevance of MLL partner gene and selected gene's expression, in this work, we have studied a cohort of 20 MLL-rearranged acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods Twenty MLL-rearranged AML patients along with a control cohort of 138 AML patients are included in this work. By RT-PCR and sequencing, MLL genetic fusion was characterized, and relative gene expression quantification was carried out for EVI1, MEIS1, MLL-3', RUNX1, SETBP1, HOXA5, and FLT3 genes. Risk stratification and association of MLL genetic partner and gene expression to overall survival, in the context of received therapy, were performed. Results MLLr cohort showed to have an OS more similar to intermediate-risk AML. Type of MLL genetic partner showed to be relevant in allo-HSCT response; having MLLT1 and MLLT3, a better benefit from it. Expression of MLL-3' region, EVI1 and FLT3, showed association with OS in patients undergoing allo-HSCT. Conclusion We show that the MLL genetic partner could have implications in allo-HSCT response, and we propose three genes whose expression could be useful for the prognosis of this leukemia in patients undergoing allo-HSCT: 3' region of MLL, EVI1, and FLT3.

Introduction: Acute myeloblastic leukaemia (AML) is an heterogeneous disease with different molecular and prognostic characteristics. According to the comorbidities and the revised 2017 European Leukaemia genetic risk stratification (ELN17), allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the best therapeutic option for many patients with AML (Grimm, Blood Adv 2020). However, relapse remains the main cause of mortality after transplantation. Impact of MRD on the outcome of patients is well recognized and ELN2017 introduced the new response category complete remission (CR) without MRD (Döhner H, Blood 2017). Detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) in AML before allogeneic HCT could be a powerful predictor of outcome and decisive when establishing strategies that modify the prognosis of these patients. Methods: Retrospective multicentre analysis of MRD by MFC of patients undergoing transplantation allogeneic in 4 centres during the period from 2012 to 2020. Both Leukaemia Associated Aberrant Immunophenotype (LAIP) and different from normal (DFN) approach were used to analyse the MRD. The MRD was carried out with 8-color panels based on Euroflow protocols. The samples were acquired in 8-color digital cytometers (FACSCanto II) calibrated and compensated according to Euroflow protocols. Results: 295 of 318 patients were evaluated. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the patients. 285 (96.7%) were in complete remission (CR), 207 had negative MRD, in 21 MRD was less than 0.1% (MRD-low) and in 57 greater than or equal to 0.1% (MRD-high). At 2 years, the overall survival (OS) and leukaemia-free survival (LFS) in the whole group were 69% (95% CI 63.18-74.18) and 58.4% (95% CI 52.4-63.9) respectively. In CR patients, MRD levels significantly influenced on outcomes, with OS and LFS of 76.7% and 67.6% for negative MRD, 68.5% and 49.7% MRD-low and 50 % and 36.6% in MRD-high, p Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Caballero: Celgene: Consultancy. Belén Vidriales: Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Montesinos: Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Stemline/Menarini: Consultancy; Tolero Pharmaceutical: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharma, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Perez-Simon: JANSSEN, TAKEDA, PFIZER, JAZZ, BMS, AMGEN, GILEAD: Other: honorarium or budget for research projects and/or participation in advisory boards and / or learning activities and / or conferences.

Este artículo ofrece algunos elementos básicos de la investigación histórica pedagógica “Acercamiento a la contribución de figuras representativas de la Educación Técnica y Profesional en el siglo XX en Guantánamo”, la cual responde a un Proyecto de Investigación dirigido por la Asociación de Pedagogos de Cuba, se ofrece una panorámica del fenómeno educativo, seleccionando como contexto geográfico Guantánamo, como contexto ideológico la Educación Técnica Profesional y en la relación espacio temporal, el siglo XX.

Introduction Several studies have shown that the minimal residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients has a prognostic value after induction and consolidation therapy. Nevertheless the relapse is the most important cause of treatment failure in these patients, although they achieved a negative MRD, and even after an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Nowadays, the value of the MRD before allogeneic BMT is still controversial. Method Multicentric study where we have studied correlative AML patients who went under an allo-HSCT in a situation of complete response, between 2012 and April'18. The MRD was analyzed by 8-coloured multiparametric flow cytometry, at least with 2 tubes per patient and 1,000,000 events per tube. We evaluated the prognostic value of the MRD before allo-HSCT. Results Between January'12 and April'18 we have gathered 90 allogeneic BMT in AML patients who were in CR, with a median age of 45 years old (17 - 66). The pre-HSCT situation was 1st complete remission (CR) in 75 patients and 2nd CR in 15. In 45 patients the conditioning regimen was myeoablative. In the group of patients (67) where we could know the risk group at diagnosis, the distribution was: low risk 18%, intermediate risk 59.7% and high risk 22.4%. The 46.7% of the donors were not related. In the last follow-up after allo-HSCT 24 patients have suffered a relapse (26.7%) and 41 (45.5%) have died (17 cases of mortality related to the transplant and 24 not related). In the global analysis the median follow-up of the overall survival (OS) was 37.5 months. Among the 90 patients, MRD was valuable in 86. Ten of 59 patients (16.9%) with negative MRD relapsed vs 12/27 (44.4%) with positive MRD, p= 0.016. If we consider only patients in 1st CR, 9/50 (18%) patients with negative MRD relapsed vs 10/22 (45.5%) with positive MRD, p= 0.02. This statistically significant difference does not exist if we consider only patients in 2nd CR. The median follow-up of OS and event free survival (EFS) was not reached in the negative MRD group and 571 days and 299 days in the positive MRD group. OS and EFS at 2 years after transplantation were 65% and 64% in the negative MRD group and 42% and 37% in the positive MRD group, p= 0.03 and p= 0.008 respectively (figure 1). Conclusions The detected MRD by 8-colour multiparametric flow cytometry previous an allo-HSCT in patients with AML in 1st CR is a prognostic factor in terms of relapse. Patients with a positive MRD before the allo-HSCT have a poorer OS and EFS than the patients with a negative MRD. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Images in Haematology

Background Recombinant human granulocyte–colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is used to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells for both autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The recombinant products clinically available are lenograstim and filgrastim, which differ from a biologic point of view as well as from their economical impact. In this regard, some studies have shown different in vitro activities although clinical studies comparing both drugs in the allogeneic transplant setting are scanty. Study Design and Methods In the current study we compare the efficacy of lenograstim and filgrastim in terms of number of circulating CD34+ cells/μL during the fifth day of G-CSF administration, the number of days of apheresis required to obtain the target cell dose, the median of CD34+ cells collected on the first day of apheresis, or the median number of total CD34+ cells collected at the end of the procedure, in a series of 146 healthy donors undergoing hematopoietic stem cell mobilization for allogeneic transplantation. Results We observed that, using a comparable dose for the two products, no significant differences were observed between the two groups. Conclusion In conclusion, the current retrospective study shows that lenograstim and filgrastim are similar in terms of efficacy for the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells in healthy donors.

Endocannabinoid system is a set of ligands, receptors and endogenous enzymes which modulate a variety of physiological effects. There are two well-characterized cannabinoid receptors, CB1 (mainly expressed in Central Nervous System) and CB2 (mainly in hematopoietic cells). Here, we tested the effect of the cannabinoid WIN-55 212-2 in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo and studied the molecular signaling pathways involved in this effect. Moreover, we synthesized a new family of twelve cannabinoids that are specific to CB2 receptor. For their design and synthesis, computational techniques of docking, analytical and spectroscopic techniques such as mass spectrometry (MS) were used. To assess the anti-leukemia effect of the different cannabinoids, we analyzed cell viability by MTT and flow cytometry using six human AML cell lines, primary cells from healthy donors (hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) and lymphocytes) and blasts from AML patients. Cannabinoids induced a potent proapoptotic effect on AML cell lines and on primary leukemic cells, which was not observed in normal HPC and lymphocytes from healthy donors. Fragmentation of PARP and activation of caspases 2, 3, 8 and 9 were confirmed by western-blot. Other proteins involved in the effect of cannabinoids were p-AKT, p-ERK 1/2, p-38 and p- JNK. Also studies on p-PERK, p-IRE1 and CHOP confirmed an increased endoplasmic reticulum stress upon exposure to cannabinoids. Mitochondrial damage was analyzed by flow cytometry using TMRE and by MitoSOXTMRed. These assays confirmed a very early mitochondrial damage in leukemic cells which was not observed in normal hematopoietic progenitor cells. Moreover, we analyzed the ceramide levels, a membrane lipid associated with death/survival cell processes by HPLC and immunohistochemistry. Remarkably, we observed significant differences in the amounts of certain subtypes of ceramides in untreated versus treated leukemic cells. The proapoptotic effect of cannabinoids on AML cells was abolished upon co-culture with either CB2 receptor antagonists or with pancaspase inhibitors. Finally, NOD/scid/IL-2R gammae null (NSG) mice were xenotransplanted with HL60 cell line. We confirmed disease infiltration in bone marrow (BM) by BM aspirates and flow cytometry assays. Once the presence of leukemic cells was confirmed, treatment with vehicle, WIN-55 cannabinoid at a dose of 5 mg/kg/day or citarabine (ARA-C) at 50 mg/kg during 5 days was administered. We observed a significantly increased survival among mice treated with WIN-55 cannabinoid as compared to both the control group and the group treated with ARA-C. In addition, we tested in vivo the effect of these compounds on normal hematopoiesis by treating healthy BALB-C mice. We confirmed that cannabinoids did not affect the viability of the different populations of hematopoietic progenitors (LK, GMP, CMP) and, moreover, an increased platelet count was observed in treated mice. Our findings indicate that cannabinoids display a highly selective proapoptotic effect against leukemic cells. Several pathways are involved in this effect, the modification in the ceramide pattern playing a main role. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Figure 3 Figure 3. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Recombinant human granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is used to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells for both autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The recombinant products clinically available are lenograstim and filgrastim, which differ from a biologic point of view as well as from their economical impact. In this regard, some studies have shown different in vitro activities although clinical studies comparing both drugs in the allogeneic transplant setting are scanty.In the current study we compare the efficacy of lenograstim and filgrastim in terms of number of circulating CD34+ cells/μL during the fifth day of G-CSF administration, the number of days of apheresis required to obtain the target cell dose, the median of CD34+ cells collected on the first day of apheresis, or the median number of total CD34+ cells collected at the end of the procedure, in a series of 146 healthy donors undergoing hematopoietic stem cell mobilization for allogeneic transplantation.We observed that, using a comparable dose for the two products, no significant differences were observed between the two groups.In conclusion, the current retrospective study shows that lenograstim and filgrastim are similar in terms of efficacy for the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells in healthy donors.