Search

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) hospital volume of throughput is associated with periprocedural and medium-term events, and whether any associations are independent of differences in case mix. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of all PCIs undertaken in Scottish National Health Service hospitals over a six-year period. METHODS: All PCIs in Scotland during 1997-2003 were examined. Linkage to administrative databases identified events over two years' follow up. The risk of events by hospital volume at 30 days and two years was compared by using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Of the 17,417 PCIs, 4900 (28%) were in low-volume hospitals and 3242 (19%) in high-volume hospitals. After adjustment for case mix, there were no significant differences in risk of death or myocardial infarction. Patients treated in high-volume hospitals were less likely to require emergency surgery (adjusted odds ratio 0.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 0.54, p = 0.002). Over two years, patients in high-volume hospitals were less likely to undergo surgery (adjusted hazard ratio 0.52, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.75, p = 0.001), but this was offset by an increased likelihood of further PCI. There was no net difference in coronary revascularisation or in overall events. CONCLUSION: Death and myocardial infarction were infrequent complications of PCI and did not differ significantly by volume. Emergency surgery was less common in high-volume hospitals. Over two years, patients treated in high-volume centres were as likely to undergo some form of revascularisation but less likely to undergo surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between angiographic and functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography in Multivessel Evaluation) study. Background: It can be difficult to determine on the coronary angiogram which lesions cause ischemia. Revascularization of coronary stenoses that induce ischemia improves a patient's functional status and outcome. For stenoses that do not induce ischemia, however, the benefit of revascularization is less clear. Methods: In the FAME study, routine measurement of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) was compared with angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. The use of the FFR in addition to angiography significantly reduced the rate of all major adverse cardiac events at 1 year. Of the 1,414 lesions (509 patients) in the FFR-guided arm of the FAME study, 1,329 were successfully assessed by the FFR and are included in this analysis. Results: Before FFR measurement, these lesions were categorized into 50% to 70% (47% of all lesions), 71% to 90% (39% of all lesions), and 91% to 99% (15% of all lesions) diameter stenosis by visual assessment. In the category 50% to 70% stenosis, 35% were functionally significant (FFR 0.80). In the category 71% to 90% stenosis, 80% were functionally significant and 20% were not. In the category of subtotal stenoses, 96% were functionally significant. Of all 509 patients with angiographically defined multivessel disease, only 235 (46%) had functional multivessel disease (>or=2 coronary arteries with an FFR Conclusions: Angiography is inaccurate in assessing the functional significance of a coronary stenosis when compared with the FFR, not only in the 50% to 70% category but also in the 70% to 90% angiographic severity category. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The appropriate treatment for patients in whom reperfusion fails to occur after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction remains unclear. There are few data comparing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (rescue PCI) with conservative care in such patients, and none comparing rescue PCI with repeated thrombolysis.Methods: We conducted a multicenter trial in the United Kingdom involving 427 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in whom reperfusion failed to occur (less than 50 percent ST-segment resolution) within 90 minutes after thrombolytic treatment. The patients were randomly assigned to repeated thrombolysis (142 patients), conservative treatment (141 patients), or rescue PCI (144 patients). The primary end point was a composite of death, reinfarction, stroke, or severe heart failure within six months.Results: The rate of event-free survival among patients treated with rescue PCI was 84.6 percent, as compared with 70.1 percent among those receiving conservative therapy and 68.7 percent among those undergoing repeated thrombolysis (overall P=0.004). The adjusted hazard ratio for the occurrence of the primary end point for repeated thrombolysis versus conservative therapy was 1.09 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.71 to 1.67; P=0.69), as compared with adjusted hazard ratios of 0.43 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.26 to 0.72; P=0.001) for rescue PCI versus repeated thrombolysis and 0.47 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.28 to 0.79; P=0.004) for rescue PCI versus conservative therapy. There were no significant differences in mortality from all causes. Nonfatal bleeding, mostly at the sheath-insertion site, was more common with rescue PCI. At six months, 86.2 percent of the rescue-PCI group were free from revascularization, as compared with 77.6 percent of the conservative-therapy group and 74.4 percent of the repeated-thrombolysis group (overall P=0.05).Conclusions: Event-free survival after failed thrombolytic therapy was significantly higher with rescue PCI than with repeated thrombolysis or conservative treatment. Rescue PCI should be considered for patients in whom reperfusion fails to occur after thrombolytic therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The relationship between atherosclerosis and endotypes of myocardial ischaemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) is unclear. We investigated potential associations between cumulative atherosclerotic plaque burden quantified using the Gensini score, novel invasive indices of coronary microvascular function (microvascular resistance reserve (MRR); resistive reserve ratio (RRR)) and related INOCA endotypes., Methods: Coronary angiography and invasive coronary function tests were simultaneously acquired in the CorMicA cohort. A comprehensive physiological assessment was performed using both a thermodilution-based diagnostic guidewire and intracoronary acetylcholine provocation testing. Angiograms were examined for luminal stenosis in each segment of the SYNTAX coronary model. Cumulative plaque burden was quantified using the Gensini score, which incorporated both the number of diseased coronary segments and stenosis severity. Results were compared with indices of microvascular function and INOCA endotypes. Angiographic analyses were performed blind to coronary physiology findings., Results: In 151 participants (median age 61 years; 73.5% female) without flow-limiting coronary artery disease, medical history included 41.7% smoking, 63.6% hypertension and 19.2% diabetes mellitus. The left anterior descending artery underwent diagnostic guidewire testing in 85.4%, and 55.0% of participants had abnormal coronary flow reserve (CFR) and/or Index of Microcirculatory Resistance (IMR). The median Gensini score was 6.0 (IQR 2.5-11.0). CFR (p=0.012), MRR (p=0.026) and RRR (p=0.026), but not IMR (p=0.445), were univariably associated with raised Gensini scores. These significant effects persisted in multivariable models controlling for potential confounders. Considering INOCA endotypes, Gensini scores differed among participants with microvascular angina (MVA) (7.0 (2.5-11.0)), vasospastic angina (VSA) (4.5 (2.0-10.0)), mixed MVA/VSA (9.0 (5.0-11.5)) and non-cardiac symptoms (3.5 (1.5-8.0)); Kruskal-Wallis p=0.030., Conclusions: Reduced CFR, MRR and RRR, and MVA were associated with increased coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden, as evidenced by higher Gensini scores. These novel findings provide a mechanistic link between INOCA and cardiovascular events, reinforcing the importance of antiatherosclerosis therapy in patients with MVA., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Dr TF received consulting fees from BioExcel; honoraria from Abbott, Boehringer, Novartis. Dr SW received honoraria from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Biosensors, Boston Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, GE Healthcare and ShockWave Medical. Dr KR received honoraria from AstraZeneca and Abbott. Dr MM received consulting fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific and ShockWave Medical; honoraria from International Medical Device Solutions and Medtronic. Dr KGO received honoraria from Abbott, Biosensors International and Boston Scientific; full-time employee of Biosensors International since May 2020. Dr CB receives research funding from the British Heart Foundation grant (RE/18/6134217, PG/19/28/34310), Chief Scientist Office, EPSRC (EP/R511705/1, EP/S030875/1) and Medical Research Council (MR/S018905/1). None of the declared interests regards the submitted work. All other authors have nothing to disclose., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: The instantaneous wave-free ratio (iwFR) has limited availability. A new resting index called the constant-resistance ratio (cRR), which dynamically identifies cardiac intervals with constant and minimum resistance, has been developed; however, its diagnostic performance is unknown. The aim of this study was to validate the cRR by retrospectively calculating the cRR values from raw pressure waveforms of 2 publicly available datasets and compare them with those of the iwFR., Methods: Waveform data from the CONTRAST and VERIFY 2 studies were used. The primary endpoint was Bland-Altman bias between cRR and iwFR. Secondary endpoints included diagnostic agreement, correlation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and success rates of cRR and iwFR., Results: Among the 1036 waveforms, 871 were successful in determining paired cRR and iwFR values, while cRR was 6% more successful than iwFR (P less than .0001). The mean bias between cRR and iwFR was 0.003, with 95% limits of agreement [-0.021,0.028]. These 2 indices were highly correlated (r = 0.991; P less than .0001). Using an iwFR of 0.89 or less as the reference standard, the optimal cRR cutoff was 0.89, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.991 (P less than .001) and a diagnostic accuracy of 96.9% (95% CI [96%, 98%])., Conclusions: The cRR, a new resting index for identifying dynamic cardiac intervals with constant and minimum resistance, demonstrated high numerical agreement, diagnostic consistency, and a higher success rate than the iwFR based on the 2 publicly available datasets.

Background: For high bleeding-risk patients (HBR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the LEADERS FREE (LF) and LEADERS FREE II (LF II) trials established the safety and efficacy of a stainless steel polymer-free biolimus-coated stent (SS-BCS) with 30 days of dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT). The LEADERS FREE III (LF III) trial investigated clinical outcomes after PCI with the next-generation cobalt-chromium thin-strut polymer-free biolimus-coated stent (CoCr-BCS) in HBR patients., Aims: To report the final 3-year results of the LF III trial and compare them to LF II., Methods: LF III was a prospective, multicentre, open-label single-arm study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the CoCr-BCS stent. The primary safety endpoint was the composite of cardiac death (CD), myocardial infarction(MI) or definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST). The primary efficacy endpoint was clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (cd-TLR). We performed a propensity-matched comparison to the 3-year outcomes of LF II., Results: After 3 years, CD/MI/ST had occurred in 57 patients (15%, 95% CI 11.8% to 19%) and cd-TLR in 23 (6.2%, 95% CI 4.1% to 9.2%) patients. In a propensity-matched comparison of patients treated with the CoCr-BCS versus the SS-BCS, there were similar rates of CD (6.6% vs 7.8%, p=0.50), MI (7.1% vs 8.3%, p=0.47) and definite/probable ST (1.1% vs 2%, HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.93, p=0.35). The rates of cd-TLR were 5.3% with CoCr-BCS versus 9.8% with SS-BCS (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.96, p=0.03)., Conclusion: LF III confirms the long-term safety and efficacy of the CoCr-BCS in HBR patients treated with 1 month of DAPT., Trial Registration Number: NCT02843633, NCT03118895., Competing Interests: Competing interests: KGO, and SSS are employees of the sponsor. DS has a consultant relationship with Biosensors. MWK reports grants and personal fees from Biosensors during the conduct of the study and grants and personal fees from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, OrbusNeich, Terumo, and Cordis/Johnson & Johnson outside the submitted work. PU reports personal fees from Biosensors and others from Centre Européen de Recherche Cardiovasculaire (CERC), Massy, France, during the conduct of the study. J-FT reports grants from the Duke Clinical Research Institute during the conduct of the study; grants from Abbott Vascular, Bayer and Biosensors; other from BMS-Pfizer Alliance; and grants from Novartis outside the submitted work. M-CM reports being the CEO of CERC, Massy, France. MBL reports grants from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic and Boston Scientific outside the submitted work. The other authors report no conflicts., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Below-the-knee (infrapopliteal) atherosclerotic disease, which presents as chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) in nearly 50% of patients, represents a treatment challenge when it comes to the endovascular intervention arm of management. Due to reduced tissue perfusion, patients usually experience pain at rest and atrophic changes correlated to the extent of the compromised perfusion. Unfortunately, the prognosis remains unsatisfactory with 30% of patients requiring major amputation and a mortality rate of 25% within 1 year. To date, randomized multicentre trials of endovascular intervention have shown that drug-eluting stents (DES) increase patency rate and lower target lesion revascularization rate compared to plain balloon angioplasty and bare-metal stents. The majority of these trials recruited patients with focal infrapopliteal lesions, while most patients requiring endovascular intervention have complex and diffuse atherosclerotic disease. Moreover, due to the nature of the infrapopliteal arteries, the use of long DES is limited. Following recent results of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in the treatment of femoropopliteal and coronary arteries, it was hoped that similar effective results would be achieved in the infrapopliteal arteries. In reality, multicentre trials have failed to support the proposed hypothesis and no advantage was found in using DCBs in comparison to plain balloon angioplasty. This review aims to explore anatomical, physiological and pathological differences between lesions of the infrapopliteal and coronary arteries to explain the differences in outcome when using DCBs., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest We hereby state that this review manuscript has not been previously published and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere at the moment. We are unaware of any conflicts of interest related to this publication, and there has been no substantial financial support for this work that could have impacted its results. As the Corresponding Author, I affirm that all named authors have read and approved the manuscript., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) has recently been introduced as a novel index to assess the vasodilatory capacity of the microcirculation, independent of epicardial disease. The prognostic value of MRR in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is unknown., Objectives: The aim of this analysis was to investigate the prognostic value of MRR in patients with STEMI and to compare MRR with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging parameters., Methods: From a pooled analysis of individual patient data from 6 cohorts that measured the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) directly after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with STEMI (n = 1,265), a subgroup analysis was performed in patients in whom both MRR and IMR were available. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality or hospitalization for heart failure., Results: Both MRR and IMR could be calculated in 446 patients. The optimal cutoff of MRR to predict the primary endpoint in this STEMI population was 1.25. During a median follow-up of 3.1 years (Q1-Q3: 1.5-6.1 years), the composite of all-cause mortality or hospitalization for heart failure occurred in 27.3% and 5.9% of patients (HR: 4.16; 95% CI: 2.31-7.50; P < 0.001) in the low MRR (≤1.25) and high MRR (>1.25) groups, respectively. Both IMR and MRR were independent predictors of the composite of all-cause mortality or hospitalization for heart failure., Conclusions: MRR measured directly after primary percutaneous coronary intervention was an independent predictor of the composite of all-cause mortality or hospitalization for heart failure during long-term follow-up., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr De Maria has received consultancy fees from Miracor Medical SA and Corflow; and has received grants from Abbott, Philips, Medtronic, Terumo, Miracor Medical SA, and Opsens. Dr van Royen has received research grants from Philips, Abbott, Medtronic, and Biotronik; and has received speaker fees from Abbott, Bayer, Rainmed, and Microport. Dr van Leeuwen has received speakers/consulting services honoraria from Terumo, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Abbott; and has received research grants from AstraZeneca, Top Sector Life Sciences & Health, Terumo, Top Medical B.V., and Abbott. Dr Pijls has received institutional research grants from Abbott and Hexacath; is a consultant for Abbott and Opsens; holds minor equity interest in Philips, ASML, HeartFlow, and GE; is a member of the scientific advisory board for HeartFlow; and has patents pending on diagnostic methods for quantifying aortic valve stenosis and microvascular physiology. Dr Fineschi has received speaker honoraria and consulting fees from St Jude Medical Italia (now Abbott). Dr Oldroyd has received honoraria from Abbott, Biosensors International, and Boston Scientific; has received an institutional research grant from Boston Scientific that supported the present manuscript; and has been a full-time employee of Biosensors International since May 2020. Dr Berry has received institutional grants/contracts from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, HeartFlow, Novartis, Siemens Healthcare; has received consulting fees from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, HeartFlow, Menarini, and Novartis; and has received honoraria from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, HeartFlow, Philips, and Valo Health. Dr Fearon has received research support from Abbott, Boston, Edwards, and Medtronic; has consulting agreements with CathWorks and Siemens; and has equity options with HeartFlow. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A simple and reproducible technique to achieve commissural alignment during transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Allegra valve is described. Slight rotation of the system before system insertion is necessary. Moreover, thanks to its permaflow system (Biosensors) and its radiopaque markings, small adjustments before valve deployment can be made to reassess correct alignment., Competing Interests: Dr Cruz Gonzalez has served as a proctor and consultant for Biosensors International. Drs Arnold and Oldroyd are employees for Biosensors International. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Influenza vaccination reduces the risk of adverse cardiovascular events.The IAMI trial randomly assigned 2571 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) to receive influenza vaccine or saline placebo during their index hospital admission. It was conducted at 30 centers in 8 countries from October 1, 2016 to March 1, 2020. In this post-hoc exploratory sub-study, we compare the trial outcomes in patients receiving early season vaccination (n = 1188) and late season vaccination (n = 1344).The primary endpoint wasthe composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stent thrombosis at 12 months. Thecumulative incidence of the primary and key secondary endpoints by randomized treatment and early or late vaccination was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the early vaccinated group, the primary composite endpoint occurred in 36 participants (6.0%) assigned to influenza vaccine and 49 (8.4%) assigned to placebo (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.45 to 1.07), compared to 31 participants (4.7%) assigned to influenza vaccine and 42 (6.2%) assigned to placebo (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.18) in the late vaccinated group (P = 0.848 for interaction on HR scale at 1 year). We observed similar estimates for the key secondary endpoints of all-cause death and CV death. There was no statistically significant difference in vaccine effectiveness against adverse cardiovascular events by timing of vaccination. The effect of vaccination on all-cause death at one year was more pronounced in the group receiving early vaccination (HR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.86) compared late vaccination group (HR 0.75; 35% CI, 0.40 to 1.40) but there was no statistically significant difference between these groups (Interaction P = 0.335). In conclusion,there is insufficient evidence from the trial to establish whether there is a difference in efficacy between early and late vaccinationbut regardless of vaccination timing we strongly recommend influenza vaccination in all patients with cardiovascular diseases., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dr Fröbert reports grants from Sanofi Pasteur, during the conduct of the study. Dr Engstrøm reports personal fees from Abbott, Bayer, and Novo Nordisk, outside the submitted work. Dr Götberg reports personal fees from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Abbott, outside the submitted work. Dr MacIntyre reports grants from Sanofi, outside the submitted work. Dr Persson reports personal fees from Abbot, grants from Abbott, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty with paclitaxel-eluting devices is an established treatment for coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR). Biolimus A9™ (BA9), a sirolimus analogue with enhanced lipophilicity, may facilitate enhanced local drug delivery into vascular tissue. A novel DCB coated with Biolimus A9™ represents an alternative to traditional paclitaxel- and sirolimus-coated devices. Hence, we sought to investigate the safety and efficacy of this novel DCB in the treatment of coronary ISR., Methods and Design: REFORM (NCT04079192) is a prospective, multicenter, single blind, randomized controlled trial comparing the BA9-DCB (Biosensors Europe SA, Morges, Switzerland) to the paclitaxel-coated SeQuent® Please DCB (Braun Melsungen AG, Germany) in the treatment of coronary ISR. A total of 201 patients with coronary artery disease and an indication for interventional treatment of ISR in a bare-metal stent (BMS) or drug-eluting stent (DES) have been randomized 2:1 to receive treatment with the BA9- or the paclitaxel-DCB comparator. Patients were enrolled across 24 investigational centers in Europe and Asia. The primary endpoint is percent diameter stenosis (%DS) of the target segment as assessed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) at 6 months. Key secondary endpoints are in-stent late lumen loss, binary restenosis, target lesion failure, target vessel failure, myocardial infarction and death at 6 months. Subjects will be followed for 24 months from enrolment., Implications: The REFORM trial will seek to prove that the BA9-DCB is non-inferior to the standard paclitaxel-DCB comparator in the treatment of coronary ISR with respect to %DS at 6 months and has similar safety characteristics., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest R.A.B. has not received personal payments from medical device or pharmaceutical companies and reports research grants to the institution of employment from Abbott Vascular, Biosensors, Biotronik and Boston Scientific. J.H. received grants from National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea, Abbott Vascular, Biosensors, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic; and speaker's fees from Abbott Vascular, Biosensors, Biotronik, and Boston Scientific. D.M. is a consultant for Medtronic, Boston Scientific and Microport. D.S., S.C., and K.G.O. are employees of Biosensors. The other authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Low fractional flow reserve (FFR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Hitherto, this assessment has been independent of the epicardial vessel interrogated., Objectives: This study sought to assess the predictive capacity of post-PCI FFR for target vessel failure (TVF) stratified by coronary artery., Methods: We performed a systematic review and individual patient-level data meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and observational studies with protocol-recommended post-PCI FFR assessment. The difference in post-PCI FFR between left anterior descending (LAD) and non-LAD arteries was assessed using a random-effect models meta-analysis of mean differences. TVF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization., Results: Overall, 3,336 vessels (n = 2,760 patients) with post-PCI FFR measurements were included in 9 studies. The weighted mean post-PCI FFR was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.87-0.90) and differed significantly between coronary vessels (LAD = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.85 to 0.88 vs non-LAD = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.91-0.94; P < 0.001). Post-PCI FFR was an independent predictor of TVF, with its risk increasing by 52% for every reduction of 0.10 FFR units, and this was mainly driven by TVR. The predictive capacity for TVF was poor for LAD arteries (AUC: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.47-0.58) and moderate for non-LAD arteries (AUC: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.59-0.73; LAD vs non-LAD arteries, P = 0.005)., Conclusions: The LAD is associated with a lower post-PCI FFR than non-LAD arteries, emphasizing the importance of interpreting post-PCI FFR on a vessel-specific basis. Although a higher post-PCI FFR was associated with improved prognosis, its predictive capacity for events differs between the LAD and non-LAD arteries, being poor in the LAD and moderate in the non-LAD vessels., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Collet received research grants from Biosensors, HeartFlow Inc, Abbott Vascular, Insight Lifetech, GE Healthcare, Siemens and Shockwave Medical. Dr Johnson has received internal funding from the Weatherhead PET Center for Preventing and Reversing Atherosclerosis; has received significant institutional research support from St. Jude Medical (CONTRAST, NCT02184117) and Philips Volcano (DEFINE-FLOW, NCT02328820) for studies using intracoronary pressure and flow sensors; has an institutional licensing agreement with Boston Scientific for the smart-minimum FFR algorithm commercialized under 510(k) K191008; and has pending patents on diagnostic methods for quantifying aortic stenosis and TAVI physiology and also algorithms to correct pressure tracings from fluid-filled catheters. Dr Mizukami has received consultancy fees from Zeon Medical. Dr Fearon receives institutional research support from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Edwards Lifesciences; he has a consulting relationship with CathWorks and Siemens; and he owns minor stock options in HeartFlow. Dr Berry receives research funding from the British Heart Foundation grant (RE/18/6134217); and is employed by the University of Glasgow, which holds consultancy and research agreements for his work with Abbott Vascular, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Causeway Therapeutics, Coroventis, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, HeartFlow, Menarini, Neovasc, Siemens Healthcare, and Valo Health. Dr Sonck is supported by a grant provided by the CardioPath PhD program. Dr Collison has received honoraria/speaker fees from Abbott. Dr Koo has received an institutional research grant from St. Jude Medical (Abbott Vascular) and Philips Volcano. Dr Meneveau has received consultancy and speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, Terumo, Boston Scientific, Bayer Healthcare, BMS-Pfizer, Boehringer, and AstraZeneca. Dr Oldroyd is an employee of Biosensors International. Dr Leipsic is a consultant for and holds stock options in Circle CVI and HeartFlow; and has a research grant from GE Healthcare. Dr Taylor is an employee of HeartFlow Inc. Dr Ko has received consultancy fees from Abbott Vascular and Medtronic; and has received research support from Canon Medical. Dr Perera has received research grant support from Abbott Vascular, HeartFlow, and Philips. Dr Leone received consultant fees and honoraria for lectures in sponsored symposia with Abbott Vascular and Bracco Imaging/ACIST Medical. Dr Matsuo has received consultancy fees from Zeon Medical; and has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular Japan, Philips, and Boston Scientific. Dr Amabile reports consulting/proctoring fees from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Shockwave Medical; and has received an institutional research grant from Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific. Dr Piróth has received consultancy and speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Opsens, and Boston Scientific. Dr Toth has received consultancy fees and research support from Abbott, Biotronik, Medtronic, and Terumo. Dr Ihdayhid reports receiving consulting honorarium from Abbott Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, Artrya Pty Ltd (including equity interest). Dr West is an employee of Abbott Vascular. Dr Munhoz is supported with a PhD grant from CardioPath. Dr Barbato has received speaker fees from Abbott and Boston Scientific. Dr Engstrøm has received consultancy and speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Novo Nordisk, and Bayer AS. Dr Escaned is supported by the Intensification of Research Activity project INT22/00088 from Spanish Instituto de Salud Carlos III, and served as speaker and advisory board member for Abbott and Philips. Dr Ali has received institutional grant support Abbott, Abiomed, ACIST Medical, Amgen, Boston Scientific, Cathworks, Canon, Conavi, Heartflow, Inari, Medtronic Inc, National Institute of Health, Nipro, Opsens Medical, Medis, Philips, Shockwave, Siemens, Spectrawave, Teleflex; and consulting fees from Abiomed, AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific, Cathworks, Opsens, Philips, Shockwave and equity in Elucid, Lifelink, Spectrawave, Shockwave, VitalConnect. Dr Kern has received speaker fees from Abbott, ACIST Medical, Boston Scientific, Opsens, and Philips. Dr Pijls has received research grants from Abbott and Hexacath and consultancy fees from Abbott, GE, Philips, and HeartFlow and have equity in GE, Philips, and Heartflow. Dr De Bruyne has received institutional consulting fees from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Siemens, and GE; has received institutional grant support from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biotronic, CathWorks, Pie Medical, and HeartFlow; and holds minor equities in Philips, Siemens, GE, Bayer, HeartFlow, Edwards Lifesciences, and Ceyliad. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite treatment with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the risk of heart failure and late death remains high. Microvascular dysfunction, as assessed by the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), after primary PCI for STEMI has been associated with worse outcomes. It is unclear whether IMR after primary PCI predicts cardiac death., Objectives: The aims of this analysis were: 1) to determine if IMR is an independent predictor of cardiac death; 2) to assess the optimal cutoff value of IMR after STEMI; and 3) to compare IMR with several cardiac magnetic resonance parameters, including infarct size., Methods: In a collaborative, pooled analysis of individual patient data from 6 cohorts that measured IMR directly after primary PCI, cardiac mortality up to 5 years was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses. The primary endpoint was cardiac death using the predefined IMR cutoff value of 40., Results: In total, 1,265 patients were included in this study with a median follow-up of 2.8 years (IQR: 1.2-5.0 years). Cardiac death at 5 years occurred in 2.2% and 4.9% of patients (HR: 2.81; 95% CI: 1.34-5.88; P = 0.006) in the IMR ≤40 and IMR >40 groups, respectively. The composite of cardiac death or hospitalization for heart failure occurred in 4.9% and 8.9% (HR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.20-3.29; P = 0.008) in the IMR ≤40 and IMR >40 groups, respectively. IMR was an independent predictor of cardiac death, whereas coronary flow reserve was not. The optimal cutoff value of IMR for the prediction of cardiac death in this cohort was 70 (HR: 4.73; 95% CI: 2.27-9.83; P < 0.001). Infarct size was 17.6% ± 13.3% and 23.9% ± 14.6% of the left ventricular mass in the IMR ≤40 and IMR >40 groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Microvascular obstruction and intramyocardial hemorrhage occurred more frequently in the IMR >40 group than in the IMR ≤40 group., Conclusions: In this large, pooled analysis of individual patient data, IMR measured directly after primary PCI in STEMI was an independent predictor of cardiac death. IMR may be used as a tool to identify patients at the time of primary PCI who are at highest risk for late cardiac mortality and who might benefit most from additional cardioprotective therapies and monitoring., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr van Royen has received research funding from Abbott, Philips, Medtronic, and Biotronik; has served as a consultant for RainMed, Castor, and Medtronic; and has received speaker fees from Abbott and Bayer. Dr van Leeuwen has received speaker/consulting service honoraria from Terumo, Daiichi Sankyo, and Abbott; and has received research grants from AstraZeneca, Top Sector Life Sciences and Health, Terumo, Top Medical BV, and Abbott. Dr Fineschi has received speaker honoraria and consulting fees from St. Jude Medical Italia (now Abbott). Dr Pijls has received institutional research grants from Abbott and Hexacath; is a consultant for Abbott and Opsens; holds minor equity interest in Philips, ASML, HeartFlow, and GE; is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of HeartFlow; and has patents pending on diagnostic methods for quantifying aortic valve stenosis and microvascular physiology. Dr Berry has received institutional grants/contracts from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, HeartFlow, Novartis, and Siemens Healthcare; has received consulting fees from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, HeartFlow, Menarini, and Novartis; and has received honoraria from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, HeartFlow, Philips, and Valo Health. Dr Oldroyd has received honoraria from Abbott, Biosensors International, and Boston Scientific; has received an institutional research grant from Boston Scientific that supported the present manuscript; and is a full-time employee of Biosensors International since May 2020. Dr Fearon has received research support from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic; has consulting agreements with CathWorks and Siemens; and has equity options with HeartFlow., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Previous studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with multivessel coronary disease not involving the left main have shown significantly lower rates of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke after CABG. These studies did not routinely use current-generation drug-eluting stents or fractional flow reserve (FFR) to guide PCI., Methods: FAME 3 (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, international, randomized trial involving patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease (not involving the left main coronary artery) in 48 centers worldwide. Patients were randomly assigned to receive FFR-guided PCI using zotarolimus drug-eluting stents or CABG. The prespecified key secondary end point of the trial reported here is the 3-year incidence of the composite of death, MI, or stroke., Results: A total of 1500 patients were randomized to FFR-guided PCI or CABG. Follow-up was achieved in >96% of patients in both groups. There was no difference in the incidence of the composite of death, MI, or stroke after FFR-guided PCI compared with CABG (12.0% versus 9.2%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.3 [95% CI, 0.98-1.83]; P =0.07). The rates of death (4.1% versus 3.9%; HR, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.6-1.7]; P =0.88) and stroke (1.6% versus 2.0%; HR, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.4-1.7]; P =0.56) were not different. MI occurred more frequently after PCI (7.0% versus 4.2%; HR, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.1-2.7]; P =0.02)., Conclusions: At 3-year follow-up, there was no difference in the incidence of the composite of death, MI, or stroke after FFR-guided PCI with current-generation drug-eluting stents compared with CABG. There was a higher incidence of MI after PCI compared with CABG, with no difference in death or stroke. These results provide contemporary data to allow improved shared decision-making between physicians and patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease., Registration: URL: https://www., Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT02100722., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Pijls receives research funding from Abbott, has consulting relationships with Abbott and Opsens, and has stock or stock options with ASML, General Electric, HeartFlow, Hexacath, and Philips. Dr Mansour has consulting relationships with Abbott Vascular, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Pfizer, and Servier Affaires, and received a research grant from Opsens Inc and Abbott Vascular. Dr Kala has a consulting relationship with Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Servier Affaires, and receives honoraria from AstraZeneca and Bayer. Dr Angeras receives research funding from Abbott Vascular and AstraZeneca and has a consulting relationship with Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific. Dr Miner has a consulting relationship with Abbott, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer, Novartis, Opsens, Pfizer, and Servier Affaires Medicales. Dr Engstrøm has a consulting relationship with Abbott Vascular, Bayer, and Novo Nordisk. Dr Christiansen has a consulting relationship with Abbott Vascular and has received research grants from Abbott Vascular. Dr Tonino has received research grants from Biosensors and Opsens. Dr Reardon has a consulting relationship with Boston Scientific and W.L. Gore & Associates. Dr Otsuki has received research grants from the Uehara Memorial Foundation, Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Terumo. Dr Kobayashi has a consulting relationship with Abbott Vascular. Dr Hlatky has a consulting relationship with Blue Cross and Blue Shield and research support from HeartFlow. Dr Mahaffey has received research grants or contracts from the American Heart Association, Apple, Inc, Bayer, California Institute Regenerative Medicine, Eidos, Ferring, Gilead, Google (Verily), Idorsia, Johnson & Johnson, Luitpold, PAC-12, Precordior, and Sanifit; has provided consulting or other services for Amgen, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, CSL Behring, Elsevier, FibroGen, Inova, Johnson & Johnson, Lexicon, MyoKardia, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, PhaseBio, Portola, Quidel, Sanofi, and Theravance; and has equity in Precordior. Dr Yeung has a consulting relationship with Medtronic. Dr De Bruyne has an institutional consulting relationship with Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, CathWorks, Siemens, GE Healthcare, and Coroventis Research; receives institutional research grants from Abbott Vascular, Coroventis Research, CathWorks, and Boston Scientific; and holds minor equities in Philips, Siemens, GE Healthcare, CathWorks, Edwards Life Sciences, HeartFlow, Opsens, Celyad, Xenter, Medyria, Bayer, and Sanofi. Dr Fearon receives research funding from Abbott, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific and has a consulting relationship with Siemens and CathWorks and stock options with HeartFlow. The other authors report no conflicts of interest.

Background: The functional SYNTAX score (FSS), which incorporates functional information as assessed by fractional flow reserve (FFR), is a better predictor of outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with less complex coronary artery disease (CAD)., Objectives: This study sought to test the prognostic value of the FSS in patients with complex CAD eligible for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)., Methods: The FAME 3 (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation 3) trial compared FFR-guided PCI with CABG in patients with angiographic 3-vessel CAD. In this prespecified substudy, the angiographic core laboratory calculated the SYNTAX score (SS) and then the FSS by eliminating lesions that were not significant based on FFR. Outcomes in the PCI patients based on the FSS and the SS were compared to each other and to the patients treated with CABG., Results: The FSS reclassified more than one-quarter of patients from an SS >22 to an FSS ≤22. In the 50% of PCI patients who had an FSS ≤22, the primary endpoint occurred at a similar rate to patients treated with CABG (P = 0.77). The primary endpoint in patients without functionally significant 3-vessel CAD was similar to the CABG group (P = 0.97). The rate of myocardial infarction and revascularization among all deferred lesions was 0.5% and 3.2%, respectively., Conclusions: By measuring the FSS, one can identify 50% of patients who have a similar outcome at 1 year with PCI compared with CABG. Lesions deferred from PCI based on FFR have a low event rate., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Kobayashi serves as a consultant for Abbott Vascular. Dr Oldroyd serves as a chief medical officer for Biosensors International. Dr Reardon serves as a consultant for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, and Gore Medical. De Bruyne has stock or stock options with Edwards LifeSciences, General Electric, HeartFlow, Philips, and Siemens. Dr Pijls has received research funding from Abbott; has consulting relationships with Abbott and Opsens; and has stock or stock options with ASML, General Electric, HeartFlow, Hexacath, and Philips. Dr Fearon has received institutional research support from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic; has a consulting relationship with CathWorks and Siemens; and has stock options with HeartFlow. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Assessing coronary physiology after stent implantation facilitates the optimisation of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Coronary artery disease (CAD) patterns can be characterised by the pullback pressure gradient (PPG) index. The impact of focal vs. diffuse disease on physiology-guided incremental optimisation strategy (PIOS) is unknown. This is a sub-study of the TARGET-FFR randomized clinical trial (NCT03259815). The study protocol directed that optimisation be attempted for patients in the PIOS arm when post-PCI FFR was <0.90. Overall, 114 patients ( n = 61 PIOS and 53 controls) with both pre-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR) pullbacks and post-PCI FFR were included. A PPG ≥ 0.74 defined focal CAD. The PPG correlated significantly with post-PCI FFR (r = 0.43; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.57; p -value < 0.001) and normalised delta FFR (r = 0.49; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.62; p -value < 0.001). PIOS was more frequently applied to vessels with diffuse CAD (6% focal vs. 42% diffuse; p -value = 0.006). In patients randomized to PIOS, those with focal disease achieved higher post-PCI FFR than patients with diffuse CAD (0.93 ± 0.05 vs. 0.83 ± 0.07, p < 0.001). There was a significant interaction between CAD patterns and the randomisation arm for post-PCI FFR ( p -value for interaction = 0.004). Physiology-guided stent optimisation was applied more frequently to vessels with diffuse disease; however, patients with focal CAD at baseline achieved higher post-PCI FFR.

Background: Twenty percent to 40% of patients are affected by angina after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), which is associated with anxiety, depression, impaired physical function, and reduced quality of life. Understanding patient and procedural factors associated with post-PCI angina may inform alternative approaches to treatment., Methods: Two hundred thirty patients undergoing PCI completed the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7) and European quality of life-5 dimension-5 level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires at baseline and 3 months post-PCI. Patients received blinded intracoronary physiology assessments before and after stenting. A post hoc analysis was performed to compare clinical and procedural characteristics among patients with and without post-PCI angina (defined by follow-up SAQ-angina frequency score <100)., Results: Eighty-eight of 230 patients (38.3%) reported angina 3 months post-PCI and had a higher incidence of active smoking, atrial fibrillation, and history of previous myocardial infarction or PCI. Compared with patients with no angina at follow-up, they had lower baseline SAQ summary scores (69.48±24.12 versus 50.20±22.59, P <0.001) and EQ-5D-5L health index scores (0.84±0.15 versus 0.69±0.22, P <0.001). Pre-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR) was lower among patients who had no post-PCI angina (0.56±0.15 versus 0.62±0.13, P =0.003). Percentage change in FFR after PCI had a moderate correlation with angina frequency score at follow-up ( r =0.36, P <0.0001). Patients with post-PCI angina had less improvement in FFR (43.1±33.5% versus 67.0±50.7%, P <0.001). There were no between-group differences in post-PCI FFR, coronary flow reserve, or corrected index of microcirculatory resistance. Patients with post-PCI angina had lower SAQ-summary scores (64.01±22 versus 95.16±8.72, P ≤0.001) and EQ-5D-5L index scores (0.69±0.26 versus 0.91±0.17, P ≤0.001) at follow-up., Conclusions: Larger improvements in FFR following PCI were associated with less angina and better quality of life at follow-up. In patients with stable symptoms, intracoronary physiology assessment can inform expectations of angina relief and quality of life improvement after stenting and thereby help to determine the appropriateness of PCI., Registration: URL: https://www., Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT03259815.

Background: Influenza vaccination early after myocardial infarction (MI) improves prognosis but vaccine effectiveness may differ dependent on type of MI., Methods: A total of 2,571 participants were prospectively enrolled in the Influenza vaccination after myocardial infarction (IAMI) trial and randomly assigned to receive in-hospital inactivated influenza vaccine or saline placebo. The trial was conducted at 30 centers in eight countries from October 1, 2016 to March 1, 2020. Here we report vaccine effectiveness in the 2,467 participants with ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI, n = 1,348) or non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI, n = 1,119). The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death, MI, or stent thrombosis at 12 months. Cumulative incidence of the primary and key secondary endpoints by randomized treatment and NSTEMI/STEMI was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment effects were evaluated with formal interaction testing to assess for effect modification., Results: Baseline risk was higher in participants with NSTEMI. In the NSTEMI group the primary endpoint occurred in 6.5% of participants assigned to influenza vaccine and 10.5% assigned to placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39-0.91), compared to 4.1% assigned to influenza vaccine and 4.5% assigned to placebo in the STEMI group (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.54-1.50, P = .237 for interaction). Similar findings were seen for the key secondary endpoints of all-cause death and cardiovascular death. The Kaplan-Meier risk difference in all-cause death at one year was more pronounced in participants with NSTEMI (NSTEMI: HR, 0.47; 95% CI 0.28-0.80, STEMI: HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.43-1.70, interaction P = .028)., Conclusions: The beneficial effect of influenza vaccination on adverse cardiovascular events may be enhanced in patients with NSTEMI compared to those with STEMI., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background The objective of the GNOCCI (Glasgow Natural History Study of Covered Stent Coronary Interventions) Study was to report the incidence and outcomes of coronary artery perforations over an 18-year period at a single, high-volume percutaneous coronary intervention center. We considered both the temporal trends and long-term outcomes of covered stent deployment. Methods and Results We evaluated procedural and long-term clinical outcomes following coronary perforation in a cohort of 43,343 consecutive percutaneous coronary intervention procedures. Procedural major adverse cardiac events were defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, target vessel revascularization, or cardiac surgery within 24 hours. A total of 161 (0.37%) procedures were complicated by coronary perforation of which 57 (35%) were Ellis grade III. Incidence increased with time over the study period ( r =0.73; P <0.001). Perforation severity was linearly associated with procedural mortality (median 2.9-year follow-up): Ellis I (0%), Ellis II (1.7%), Ellis III/IIIB (21%), P <0.001. Procedural major adverse cardiac events occurred in 47% of patients with Ellis III/IIIB versus 13.5% of those with Ellis I/II perforations (odds ratio, 5.8; 95% CI, 2.7-12.5; P <0.001). Covered stents were associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis at 2.9-year follow-up (Academic Research Consortium definite or probable; 9.1% versus 0.9%; risk ratio, 10.5; 95% CI, 1.1-97; P =0.04). Conclusions The incidence of coronary perforation increased between 2001 and 2019. Severe perforation was associated with higher procedural major adverse cardiac events and was an independent predictor of long-term mortality. Although covered stents are a potentially lifesaving treatment, the generation of devices used during the study period was limited by their efficacy and high risk of stent thrombosis. Registration Information Clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT03862352.

Background: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel alternative to rotational atherectomy (RA) for the modification of heavily calcified coronary stenoses prior to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We compare the real-world resource utilization and associated costs of PCI with adjunctive RA and IVL., Methods: We compared the resource utilization, in-lab consumable costs and procedural data of 120 patients who underwent PCI with IVL from the Disrupt-CAD II study (NCT03328949) to 60 patients who underwent PCI with RA at the Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK. The RA patients were consecutive and selected on the basis of being deemed suitable for IVL by an independent interventional cardiologist experienced in the use of both techniques., Results: PCI with IVL was associated with significantly lower costs than PCI with RA (mean difference £ 398 [95% CI: £ 181-615]; P<0.001). Considering between-group differences, the IVL group used 4.02 fewer balloons (P<0.001), 3.03 fewer guidewires (P<0.001), 0.52 fewer guide catheters (P=0.001), 0.22 fewer guide extensions (P=0.004) and 1.03 fewer drug eluting stents (DES) (P<0.001) per case than the RA group. The IVL group had shorter procedural duration (mean difference 13.3 min [95% CI: 3.6-23.0]; P=0.008) but longer fluoroscopy times (mean difference 4.4 min [95% CI: 1.7-7.1]; P=0.002)., Conclusions: In this indirect comparison, we found that the higher initial device costs of IVL may be offset by a lower overall resource utilization. Further research is required to confirm this, and future randomized trials should include a formal health economic analysis.

Background: Previous studies have shown that quality of life improves after coronary revascularization more so after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) than after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of fractional flow reserve guidance and current generation, zotarolimus drug-eluting stents on quality of life after PCI compared with CABG., Methods: The FAME 3 trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) is a multicenter, international trial including 1500 patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease who were randomly assigned to either CABG or fractional flow reserve-guided PCI. Quality of life was measured using the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire at baseline and 1 and 12 months. The Canadian Cardiovascular Class angina grade and working status were assessed at the same time points and at 6 months. The primary objective was to compare EQ-5D summary index at 12 months. Secondary end points included angina grade and work status., Results: The EQ-5D summary index at 12 months did not differ between the PCI and CABG groups (difference, 0.001 [95% CI, -0.016 to 0.017]; P =0.946). The trajectory of EQ-5D during the 12 months differed ( P <0.001) between PCI and CABG: at 1 month, EQ-5D was 0.063 (95% CI, 0.047 to 0.079) higher in the PCI group. A similar trajectory was found for the EQ (EuroQol) visual analogue scale. The proportion of patients with Canadian Cardiovascular Class 2 or greater angina at 12 months was 6.2% versus 3.1% (odds ratio, 2.5 [95% CI, 0.96-6.8]), respectively, in the PCI group compared with the CABG group. A greater percentage of younger patients (<65 years old) were working at 12 months in the PCI group compared with the CABG group (68% versus 57%; odds ratio, 3.9 [95% CI, 1.7-8.8])., Conclusions: In the FAME 3 trial, quality of life after fractional flow reserve-guided PCI with current generation drug-eluting stents compared with CABG was similar at 1 year. The rate of significant angina was low in both groups and not significantly different. The trajectory of improvement in quality of life was significantly better after PCI, as was working status in those <65 years old., Registration: URL: https://www., Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT02100722.

Background: While female sex has been associated with worse outcomes following coronary revascularization, previous analyses in left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease have been conflicting. In addition, a signal that increased mortality may be specific to women treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) requires further investigation., Methods: Nordic-Baltic-British left main revascularization study (NOBLE) was a randomized trial comparing PCI to coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) in patients with LMCA disease. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, nonprocedural myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and stroke (major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events [MACCE]). We report the 5-year sex-specific outcomes., Results: Of 1184 patients analyzed, 256 (22%) were female and 928 (78%) were male. There were no significant within-sex differences in baseline characteristics, disease location, or complexity between those treated with PCI and those with CABG. The 5-year MACCE rates were 29% and 15% in females and 28% and 20% in males treated with PCI and CABG, respectively. Within both sexes, there was an increased risk of MACCE with PCI compared with CABG, but no difference in all-cause mortality. On multivariate analysis, female sex was not an independent predictor of MACCE., Conclusions: Following the treatment of LMCA disease, long-term outcomes favored CABG over PCI in both sexes. Importantly, there was no difference in all-cause mortality in females or males at 5 ​years., Competing Interests: Dr McEntegart has received consultancy fees from Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific. Dr Holm has received institutional research grants from 10.13039/501100008877Biosensors, 10.13039/100001316Abbott, 10.13039/100015305Reva Medical, Medis Medical Imaging, and 10.13039/100008497Boston Scientific and speaker fees from Terumo, Abbott, Reva Medical, and Medis Medical Imaging. Dr Oldroyd has received speaker fees from Biosensors and Abbott Vascular. Dr Erglis has received institutional research grants from 10.13039/100011949Abbott Vascular and 10.13039/100008497Boston Scientific and consultancy fees from Abbott Vascular, Biosensors, Boston Scientific, Cordis J&J, and Medtronic. Dr Christiansen has received grants from 10.13039/501100008877Biosensors. None of the other authors have any conflicts of interest., (© 2022 The Authors.)