Search

Lessons learnedThe results from the liposarcoma cohort of SARC024 confirm previously published data and do not support the routine use of regorafenib in this patient population. Continued exploration of novel therapies, including combination approaches, is warranted for a patient population in whom limited treatment options exist.BackgroundRegorafenib is a multitargeted kinase inhibitor with a kinase profile overlapping, but distinct from, pazopanib, an agent approved for recurrent and metastatic non-gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), non-adipocytic soft tissue sarcoma. We conducted a randomized, phase II study of regorafenib versus placebo in refractory liposarcoma patients.MethodsPatients with advanced or metastatic, treatment-refractory liposarcoma were randomized 1:1 to receive regorafenib 160 mg or placebo once daily (3 weeks on, 1 week off). Patients with well-differentiated liposarcoma only were excluded. Crossover for placebo was allowed upon progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), according to RECIST version 1.1.ResultsForty-eight subjects with liposarcoma (34 dedifferentiated, 12 myxoid/round cell, 2 pleomorphic) were enrolled. Median PFS was 1.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92-3.67) months for regorafenib versus 2.07 (95% CI, 1.64-3.44) months for placebo; stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.85 (95% CI, 0.46, 1.58), p = .62. No responses were seen on regorafenib. One PR was observed on placebo. Median overall survival was 6.46 (95% CI, 4.16-23.48) months for regorafenib and 4.89 (95% CI, 3.02-9.77) months for placebo, stratified HR, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.31-1.40), p = .28). Treatment-related adverse events were similar to the known safety profile of regorafenib.ConclusionRegorafenib did not appear to improve PFS in treatment-refractory liposarcoma. No new significant safety signals were observed.

BackgroundOutcomes for children and adults with advanced soft tissue sarcoma are poor with traditional therapy. We investigated whether the addition of pazopanib to preoperative chemoradiotherapy would improve pathological near complete response rate compared with chemoradiotherapy alone.MethodsIn this joint Children's Oncology Group and NRG Oncology multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial, we enrolled eligible adults (aged ≥18 years) and children (aged between 2 and 16 years) performance status score of at least 70. Patients received ifosfamide (2·5 g/m2 per dose intravenously on days 1-3 with mesna) and doxorubicin (37·5 mg/m2 per dose intravenously on days 1-2) with 45 Gy preoperative radiotherapy, followed by surgical resection at week 13. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using a web-based system, in an unmasked manner, to receive oral pazopanib (if patients

PurposeOsteosarcoma is a rare cancer and a third of patients who have completed primary treatment will develop osteosarcoma recurrence. The Src pathway has been implicated in the metastatic behavior of osteosarcoma; about 95% of samples examined express Src or have evidence of downstream activation of this pathway. Saracatinib (AZD0530) is a potent and selective Src kinase inhibitor that was evaluated in adults in Phase 1 studies. The primary goal of this study was to determine if treatment with saracatinib could increase progression-free survival (PFS) for patients who have undergone complete resection of osteosarcoma lung metastases in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Patients and Methods. Subjects with recurrent osteosarcoma localized to lung and who had complete surgical removal of all lung nodules were randomized within six weeks after complete surgical resection. Saracatinib, or placebo, was administered at a dose of 175 mg orally, once daily, for up to thirteen 28-day cycles.ResultsThirty-seven subjects were included in the analyses; 18 subjects were randomized to receive saracatinib and 19 to receive placebo. Intent-to-treat analysis demonstrated a median PFS of 19.4 months in the saracatinib treatment group and 8.6 months in the placebo treatment group (p=0.47). Median OS was not reached in either arm.ConclusionsAlthough saracatinib was well tolerated in this patient population, there was no apparent impact of the drug in this double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial on OS, and Src inhibition alone may not be sufficient to suppress metastatic progression in osteosarcoma. There is a suggestion of potential clinical benefit as evidenced by longer PFS in patients randomized to saracatinib based on limited numbers of patients treated.

Simple Summary: Myxoid liposarcoma (MLPS) is a rare soft tissue sarcoma, often affecting the proximal extremity. There is currently limited literature describing MLPS in older individuals. This retrospective study describes treatment outcomes and tolerability in older patients treated for non-metastatic MLPS. The study shows that older patients with MLPS tolerated systemic therapy, radiation therapy, and surgery with few toxicities. Background: Myxoid liposarcoma predominantly affects young and middle-aged individuals, and little is known regarding treatment tolerability and outcomes in older patients. This study aims to better understand this older patient population. Methods: This single institution retrospective study included patients aged 70 years and older with localized (non-metastatic) myxoid liposarcoma. Results: Sixteen patients were included. The median age was 75 years, and 9 (56%) were female. Fourteen (88%) were extremity tumors and two (12%) were trunk. The median tumor size was 10.4 cm (range, 3.6 to 28 cm). Five (31%) tumors had a round cell component. All patients had surgery. Fourteen (88%) had perioperative radiation, and three (19%) had perioperative chemotherapy. One patient had postoperative infection, and one patient had neutropenic fever from preoperative chemotherapy. The median follow up from surgery was 6.3 years. Eight (50%) patients died from MLPS. The median relapse-free survival and overall survival were 34 months and 75 months, respectively. Conclusions: Most older patients with localized MLPS received perioperative radiation therapy with surgery, and few serious toxicities were reported. Even with treatment, half of the patients relapsed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcoma presents a challenge for treating physicians, both in terms of prognostication and management. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes and factors associated with recurrence and survival among patients with synovial sarcoma who were diagnosed after unplanned excision. We found that synovial sarcoma is initially excised in a non-oncologic fashion at a high rate, and those who had residual tumor on re-excision fared worse than those without residual tumor. We suggest that margin-negative re-resection and radiotherapy be strongly considered for those who previously have undergone unplanned excision of synovial sarcoma. Background: Synovial sarcoma is rare and may present as a small, slow-growing mass. These tumors are often mistaken as benign and are therefore prone to unplanned and/or non-oncologic excision. We sought to identify the rate of unplanned excision of synovial sarcoma and risk factors for recurrence and survival among this cohort. Methods: The medical records of 246 patients evaluated at a single institution for synovial sarcoma between 1997 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 87 (35%) underwent unplanned, non-oncologic excision. The mean age of the cohort was 49 years. Primary tumors were located in the extremity (n = 63), abdomen (n = 6), thorax (n = 7), head/neck (n = 8), and paraspinal region (n = 3). The median maximum pre-treatment dimension of the primary tumor was 4.8 cm (IQR 7–2.4). Seventy-seven (86%) patients underwent re-excision of the tumor bed, 39 (45%) received chemotherapy, and 63 (72%) received radiation therapy. Results: Among patients who underwent unplanned excision, local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 98% at 1 year and 82% at 5 years. Metastasis-free survival (MFS) was 91% at 1 year and 72% at 5 years. Disease-specific survival (DSS) was 98% at 1 year and 72% at 5 years. When adjusting for tumor size, tumors which underwent unplanned excision did not have worse recurrence or survival compared to those which had planned excision (p > 0.10). Size > 5 cm, monophasic subtype, and axial location were associated with increased risk of disease recurrence. Forty-six patients had residual tumor following re-excision, which was associated with worse MFS (HR 8.17, 95% CI [1.89, 35.2], p < 0.01) and DSS (HR 7.66, 95% CI [1.76, 33.4], p < 0.01). Patients who received radiotherapy had improved MFS (HR 6.4, 95% CI [1.42, 29.0], p = 0.02) and DSS (HR 5.86, 95% CI [1.27, 26.9], p = 0.02). Conclusions: One-third of patients presenting with synovial sarcoma were diagnosed after unplanned, non-oncologic excision. Patients with large, axial tumors had worse survival. Approximately half of patients who underwent unplanned excision had no residual tumor after pre-operative radiation. The use of radiation was associated with decreased rates of recurrence and improved disease-specific survival. Our results suggest that margin-negative re-resection and radiotherapy should be considered when feasible following unplanned excision of synovial sarcoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Liposarcoma, one of the most prevalent sarcoma histologies, is recognized for its tendency for extra-pulmonary metastases. While oligometastatic cardiac disease is rarely reported, it poses a unique challenge as oligometastatic sarcomas are often managed with surgical resection. Case Report: We present a case of a 62-year-old man diagnosed with an oligometastatic myxoid liposarcoma (MLPS) to the heart 19 years after the primary tumor resection from the lower limb. The metastatic mass, situated in the pericardium adjacent and infiltrating the left ventricle, was not managed surgically but with a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The patient's disease remains stable to date, for more than 10 years. Literature Review: We conducted a review of the literature to determine the preferred management approach for solitary cardiac metastases of sarcomas. We also conducted an in-depth analysis focusing on reported cases of MLPS metastasizing to the heart, aiming to extract pertinent data regarding the patient characteristics and the corresponding management strategies. Conclusions: Although clinical diagnoses of solitary or oligometastatic cardiac metastases from sarcomas are infrequent, this case underscores the significance of aggressive management employing chemotherapy and radiotherapy for chemosensitive and radiosensitive sarcomas, especially when surgical removal is high-risk. Furthermore, it challenges the notion that surgery is the exclusive therapeutic option leading to long-term clinical benefit in patients with recurrent sarcomas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Regorafenib is one of several FDA‐approved cancer therapies targeting multiple tyrosine kinases. However, there are few subtype‐specific data regarding kinase inhibitor activity in sarcomas. We report results of a single arm, phase II trial of regorafenib in advanced Ewing family sarcomas. Methods: Patients with metastatic Ewing family sarcomas (age ≥ 18, ECOG 0–2, good organ function) who had received at least one line of therapy and experienced progression within 6 months of registration were eligible. Prior kinase inhibitors were not allowed. The initial dose of regorafenib was 160 mg oral days 1–21 of a 28‐day cycle. The primary endpoint was estimating progression‐free rate (PFR) at 8 weeks employing RECIST 1.1. Results: Thirty patients (median age, 32 years; 33% women [10 patients]; bone primary, 40%; extraskeletal primary, 60%) enrolled at 14 sites. The most common grade 3 or higher toxicities were hypophosphatemia (5 grade 3, 1 grade 4), hypertension (2 grade 3), elevated ALT (2 grade 3). Sixteen patients required dose reductions, most often for hypophosphatemia (n = 7 reductions in 6 patients); two stopped regorafenib for toxicity. There was one death unrelated to treatment in the 30‐day post‐study period. Median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 14.8 weeks (95% CI 7.3–15.9); PFR at 8 weeks by Kaplan–Meier analysis was 63% (95% CI 46–81%). The RECIST 1.1 response rate was 10%. Median OS was 53 weeks (95% CI 37–106 weeks). Conclusions: Regorafenib has modest activity in the Ewing family sarcomas. Toxicity was similar to that seen in approval studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]