Search

Background: Preeclampsia is a major pregnancy complication associated with long-term maternal cardiometabolic disease. Research generally is focused on metabolic and pathophysiological changes during pregnancy; however, there is much less focus on the early postpartum period in subjects who suffered preeclampsia. The aim of this study was to (1) characterize energy intake and expenditure 6 months following normotensive and preeclamptic pregnancies and (2) examine associations between energy balance, body composition, insulin resistance measures (HOMA-IR), and clinical characteristics. Design: A cross-sectional study 6 months following normotensive (n = 75) and preeclamptic (n = 22) pregnancies was performed. Metabolic measurements included anthropometrics measures, body composition via bioelectrical impedance analysis, 24-h energy expenditure via SenseWear Armbands, energy intake via a 3-day food diary, and serum metabolic parameters. Results: Six months following preeclampsia, women had a significantly higher weight (77.3 ± 20.9 kg vs 64.5 ± 11.4 kg, P = 0.01), fat mass percentage (FM%; 40.7 ± 7.4% vs 34.9 ± 8.1%, P = 0.004), and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR 2.2 ± 1.5 vs 1.0 ± 0.7, P = 0.003), as well as reduced HDL levels (1.5 ± 0.4 mmol/L vs 1.8 ± 0.4 mmol/L, P = 0.01) compared to normotensive women. Women post-preeclampsia had lower activity-related energy expenditure (P = 0.02) but a decreased total energy intake (P = 0.02), leading to a more negative energy balance compared to their normotensive counterparts (-1942 kJ/24 h vs -480 kJ/24 h, P = 0.02). Conclusion: Increases in insulin resistance and FM%, reduced high-density lipoprotein, and more sedentary lifestyles characterize the postpartum period following preeclamptic compared with normotensive pregnancies. Early post-preeclampsia interventions, such as lifestyle behavior change, should be implemented and assessed to determine whether they reduce long-term cardiometabolic risk in women who experienced preec

Background: Hypertensive pregnancy is associated with increased long-term cardiometabolic disease risk. Assessing dietary intake patterns after hypertensive (HP) versus normotensive pregnancy (NP) may provide insights into the mechanism of this risk. Methods: This study was a prospective sub-study of the P4 (Postpartum, Physiology, Psychology and Paediatrics) cohort. Women were studied six months after NP versus HP (preeclampsia or gestational hypertension). Dietary energy, macronutrient and micronutrient intake were measured using a three-day food diary (FoodWorks™) and assessed against Australian and New Zealand Nutrient Reference Values to determine nutritional adequacy. Comparisons between breastfeeding and non-breastfeeding women were assessed, and linear regression modelling (using hypertensive status, breastfeeding status, and demographic/pregnancy variables) performed to assess predictors of energy intake. Results: Seventy-four women (60 NP, 14 HP) were included. HP women had higher mean body mass index (p = 0.02) and lower breastfeeding rates (29% HP versus 83% NP, p < 0.001) compared to NP women. Twenty-four-hour energy intake and total fat intake were 17% and 20% lower after HP respectively. Nutrient deficiencies were prevalent across all participants, however more HP women had inadequate magnesium, calcium and phosphorus intake. Breastfeeding women had significantly increased energy (17%), carbohydrate (15%) and total fat intake (21%), and increased vitamin A, vitamin E, riboflavin, magnesium and iron intake compared to non-breastfeeding women. HP and breastfeeding status were independent predictors of energy intake. Conclusions: HP women had lower micronutrient intake and greater prevalence of nutritional inadequacy compared to NP women, reflecting poorer diet quality and potentially contributing to future increased cardiometabolic disease risk.