Search

The new coronavirus infection causes severe respiratory failure following respiratory tract infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). All currently approved vaccines are administered intramuscularly; however, intranasal administration enhances mucosal immunity, facilitating the production of a less invasive vaccine with fewer adverse events. Herein, a recombinant vaccine combining the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain (RBD), or S1 protein, with CpG-deoxyoligonucleotide (ODN) or aluminum hydroxide (alum) adjuvants was administered intranasally or subcutaneously to mice. Serum-specific IgG titers, IgA titers in the alveolar lavage fluid, and neutralizing antibody titers were analyzed. The nasal administration of RBD protein did not increase serum IgG or IgA titers in the alveolar lavage fluid. However, a significant increase in serum IgG was observed in the intranasal group administered with S1 protein with CpG-ODN and the subcutaneous group administered with S1 protein with alum. The IgA and IgG levels increased significantly in the alveolar lavage fluid only after the intranasal administration of the S1 protein with CpG-ODN. The neutralizing antibody titers in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage were significantly higher in the intranasal S1-CpG group than in every other group. Hence, the nasal administration of the S1 protein vaccine with CpG adjuvant might represent an effective vaccine candidate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An effective vaccine against Pseudomonas aeruginosa would benefit people susceptible to severe infection. Vaccination targeting V antigen (PcrV) of the P. aeruginosa type III secretion system is a potential prophylactic strategy for reducing P. aeruginosa-induced acute lung injury and acute mortality. We created a recombinant protein (designated POmT) comprising three antigens: full-length PcrV (PcrV#1-#294), the outer membrane domain (#190-342) of OprF (OprF#190-#342), and a non-catalytic mutant of the carboxyl domain (#406-613) of exotoxin A (mToxA#406-#613(E553Δ)). In the combination of PcrV and OprF, mToxA, the efficacy of POmT was compared with that of single-antigen vaccines, two-antigen mixed vaccines, and a three-antigen mixed vaccine in a murine model of P. aeruginosa pneumonia. As a result, the 24 h-survival rates were 79%, 78%, 21%, 7%, and 36% in the POmT, PcrV, OprF, mTox, and alum-alone groups, respectively. Significant improvement in acute lung injury and reduction in acute mortality within 24 h after infection was observed in the POmT and PcrV groups than in the other groups. Overall, the POmT vaccine exhibited efficacy comparable to that of the PcrV vaccine. The future goal is to prove the efficacy of the POmT vaccine against various P. aeruginosa strains. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The mechanisms underlying the effects of immunoglobulins on bacterial infections are thought to involve bacterial cell lysis via complement activation, phagocytosis via bacterial opsonization, toxin neutralization, and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Nevertheless, recent advances in the study of the pathogenicity of Gram-negative bacteria have raised the possibility of an association between immunoglobulin and bacterial toxin secretion. Over time, new toxin secretion systems like the type III secretion system have been discovered in many pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria. With this system, the bacterial toxins are directly injected into the cytoplasm of the target cell through a special secretory apparatus without any exposure to the extracellular environment, and therefore with no opportunity for antibodies to neutralize the toxin. However, antibodies against the V-antigen, which is located on the needle-shaped tip of the bacterial secretion apparatus, can inhibit toxin translocation, thus raising the hope that the toxin may be susceptible to antibody targeting. Because multi-drug resistant bacteria are now prevalent, inhibiting this secretion mechanism is an attractive alternative or adjunctive therapy against lethal bacterial infections. Thus, it is not unreasonable to define the blocking effect of anti-V-antigen antibodies as the fifth mechanism for immunoglobulin action against bacterial infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]