Search

Background/Objectives: Electroencephalography (EEG) is considered a standard but powerful tool for the diagnosis of neurological and psychiatric diseases. With modern imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and magnetoencephalography (MEG), source localization can be improved, especially with low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA). The aim of this review is to explore the variety of modern techniques with emphasis on the efficacy of LORETA in detecting brain activity patterns in schizophrenia. The study's novelty lies in the comprehensive survey of EEG methods and detailed exploration of LORETA in schizophrenia research. This evaluation aligns with clinical objectives and has been performed for the first time. Methods: The study is split into two sections. Part I examines different EEG methodologies and adjuncts to detail brain activity in deep layers in articles published between 2018 and 2023 in PubMed. Part II focuses on the role of LORETA in investigating structural and functional changes in schizophrenia in studies published between 1999 and 2024 in PubMed. Results: Combining imaging techniques and EEG provides opportunities for mapping brain activity. Using LORETA, studies of schizophrenia have identified hemispheric asymmetry, especially increased activity in the left hemisphere. Cognitive deficits were associated with decreased activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and other areas. Comparison of the first episode of schizophrenia and a chronic one may help to classify structural change as a cause or as a consequence of the disorder. Antipsychotic drugs such as olanzapine or clozapine showed a change in P300 source density and increased activity in the delta and theta bands. Conclusions: Given the relatively low spatial resolution of LORETA, the method offers benefits such as accessibility, high temporal resolution, and the ability to map depth layers, emphasizing the potential of LORETA in monitoring the progression and treatment response in schizophrenia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Studies suggest that the components of brain-evoked potentials (EPs) may serve as biomarkers of the post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) caused by participation in combat operations; however, to date, research remains fragmented, with no studies that have attempted to combine different paradigms. In addition, the mismatch negativity component has not been studied in a Russian sample of veterans with PTSD., Aim: To identify objective neurophysiological markers of combat-related PTSD using the method of auditory-evoked potentials in active and passive listening paradigms., Methods: The study included a recording of auditory EPs in an oddball paradigm in three settings: 1) directed attention to auditory stimuli, 2) passive listening while viewing a neutral video sequence, and 3) viewing a video sequence associated with a traumatic event. Combatants diagnosed with PTSD (18 people) were compared with mentally healthy civilian volunteers (22 people)., Results: An increase in the latency period of the early components of auditory EP (N100 and P200), an increase in the amplitude of the P200 component to a deviant stimulus, and a decrease to a standard one in the active listening paradigm were established in the PTSD group. There were no significant differences in the parameters of the P300 component. The characteristics of mismatch negativity in the passive paradigm were revealed: an increase in the phenomenon amplitude, both when shown a video sequence associated with a traumatic event and when shown a neutral video sequence. A binary logistic regression model constructed using the selected parameters showed that the identified characteristics can potentially be considered as diagnostic markers of PTSD in combatants, as the classification accuracy stood at 87% (sensitivity - 81%, specificity - 91%)., Conclusion: Potential neurophysiological markers of PTSD are the following: the amplitude and latency of early components of auditory EPs in the paradigm of directed attention to stimuli and the amplitude of mismatch negativity during passive attention., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© Authors, 2024.)