Search

Studies on the penetration of toxicologically or pharmaceutically relevant substances through the skin and, more specifically, through the stratum corneum (s.c.) often rely on the well-established method of tape stripping. Tape stripping involves the removal of skin layers by means of adhesive tape, which is usually followed by quantification of dermally applied substances in these layers. However, the amount of s.c. removed by each individual tape strip is still a matter of scientific debate. While some studies imply that the amount of s.c. adhering to each tape strip decreases with increasing depth into the s.c., others observed a constant removal rate. All these studies rely on the quantification of the amount of s.c. captured on individual or pooled tape strips. Here, we present an approach whereby we measured the amount of s.c. remaining on excised porcine skin in the process of tape stripping. Staining and bloating of the s.c. allowed to measure its thickness and to count individual s.c. layers, respectively. Histologically, we show that the s.c. remaining on the skin decreased linearly as a function of strips taken. We found that each tape strip removes about 0.4 µm of s.c., which corresponds to approximately one cellular layer. With a high coefficient of determination (r 2  > 0.95), we were able to linearly correlate the thickness of the remaining s.c., the number of remaining cell layers and the number of tape strips applied. Furthermore, we elaborate on possible reasons for the discrepancies reported in the scientific literature regarding the amount of s.c. removed by each tape strip., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

In this study, we determined partition (K sc/m ) and diffusion (D sc ) coefficients of five different polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) migrating from squalane into and through the stratum corneum (s.c.) layer of the skin. Carcinogenic PAH have previously been detected in numerous polymer-based consumer products, especially those dyed with carbon black. Upon dermal contact with these products, PAH may penetrate into and through the viable layers of the skin by passing the s.c. and thus may become bioavailable. Squalane, a frequent ingredient in cosmetics, has also been used as a polymer surrogate matrix in previous studies. K sc/m and D sc are relevant parameters for risk assessment because they allow estimating the potential of a substance to become bioavailable upon dermal exposure. We developed an analytical method involving incubation of pigskin with naphthalene, anthracene, pyrene, benzo[a]pyrene and dibenzo[a,h]pyrene in Franz diffusion cell assays under quasi-infinite dose conditions. PAH were subsequently quantified within individual s.c. layers by gas chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. The resulting PAH depth profiles in the s.c. were fitted to a solution of Fick's second law of diffusion, yielding K sc/m and D sc . The decadic logarithm logK sc/m ranged from -0.43 to +0.69 and showed a trend to higher values for PAH with higher molecular masses. D sc , on the other hand, was similar for the four higher molecular mass PAH but about 4.6-fold lower than for naphthalene. Moreover, our data suggests that the s.c./viable epidermis boundary layer represents the most relevant barrier for the skin penetration of higher molecular mass PAH. Finally, we empirically derived a mathematical description of the concentration depth profiles that better fits our data. We correlated the resulting parameters to substance specific constants such as the logarithmic octanol-water partition coefficient logP, K sc/m and the removal rate at the s.c./viable epidermis boundary layer., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)