Search

Background: Exogenous gonadotropin-controlled ovarian stimulation is the critical step in animal reproductive management, such as pig, sheep, bovine and other species. It helps synchronize ovulation or stimulate multiple ovulations. However, a number of evidence indicated an unexpected decrease in pregnancy outcomes following ovarian stimulation. This study aimed to explore the underlying mechanism of the pregnancy defect and develop a practical rescue strategy. Results: Compared with those in the control group, gilts that underwent ovarian stimulation showed a decrease in pregnancy rate, farrowing rate, and total number of piglets born. Stimulated gilts also showed an increase in estradiol (E2) levels. The supraphysiological E2 level was correlated with the decrease in the number of piglets born. Furthermore, we found that high levels of E2 impair uterine receptivity, as shown by the overproliferation of endometrial epithelial cells. In vitro mechanistic studies demonstrated that high levels of E2 hyperactivate FGF-FGFR-ERK signaling cascade in the uterine endometrium, and in turn induces overproliferation of endometrial epithelial cells. Of note, N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) supplementation effectively inhibits ERK hyperphosphorylation and ameliorates endometrial epithelial overproliferation. Importantly, in vivo experiments indicated that dietary NAC supplementation, compared with ovarian stimulation group, improves the uterine receptivity in gilts, and significantly increases the pregnancy rate and total number of piglets born. Conclusions: Ovarian stimulation-induced supraphysiological levels of E2 impairs uterine receptivity by hyperactivating FGF-FGFR-ERK signaling cascade, thereby reducing pregnancy rate and litter size. Supplementing NAC to a conventional diet for gilts ameliorates hyperactivated ERK signaling and improves uterine receptivity, thus rescuing adverse pregnancy outcomes following ovarian stimulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Social elective egg freezing (EEF) is now widely used globally but in many countries is unaffordable to many women because of high costs and lacking insurance coverage. Efforts to reduce costs, therefore, are of importance. Surprisingly, a simple, well-defined and practical approach ensuring optimal outcomes for EEF has, however, so-far not been published. We, therefore, conducted a narrative review of the literature for relevant articles regarding the different steps of ovarian stimulation (OS) in the EEF process, in order to define such a standard protocol. This review revealed that in order to maximize oocyte yields with minimal number of OS cycles - while ensuring patient safety - a multiple-dose GnRH antagonist protocol with a daily gonadotropin dose of 300 IU appears best, unless patients demonstrate a polycystic ovarian phenotype, suggestive of likely high responses. The initial gonadotropin should be recFSH, while LH supplementation should be co-administered with the addition of GnRH antagonist. Final follicular maturation should be triggered by GnRH agonist trigger, with a dual trigger (1000–1500 IU hCG) considered for suboptimal responders to GnRH agonist trigger, optionally with Cabergoline to mitigate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in high responders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To analyze whether combinations of polymorphisms within FSHR gene influence ovarian response (OR) to stimulation. A multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted from 11/2016–06/2019 in Europe and Asia including predicted normo-responders under 38y. Patients underwent ovarian stimulation using fixed-dose 150 IU rFSH in a GnRH antagonist protocol. FSHR variants rs6165, rs6166 and rs1394205 were genotyped and combined in diplotypes. OR was compared following multivariable regression. rs6165/rs6166 genotype AG/AG exhibited more hypo-response (33.1% vs. 24%,adjOR 1.77 [95%CI 1.08–2.90]) and lower Follicle to Oocyte Index (FOI) compared with other diplotypes (EMD -11.72 [95%CI -20.89;-2.55]). Genotype GG/AA showed less hypo-response (19.1% vs. 31%, adjOR 0.48 [95%CI 0.24–0.96]), while AA/AA had higher FOI (EMD 20.04 [95%CI 4.51;35.56]). Concerning rs6165/rs1394205, less oocytes (EMD -1.99 [95%CI -3.57;-0.42]) and lower FOI (EMD -12.07 [95%CI -23.09;-1.05]) were retrieved with genotype AG/AG and higher FORT with genotype AA/AG (EMD 17.88 [95%CI 3.77;31.98]). Regarding rs6166/rs1394205, less hypo-response (16.3% vs. 29.5%,adjOR 0.42 [95%CI 0.19–0.97]), more oocytes (EMD 3.45 [95%CI 1.57;5.34]) and higher FOI (EMD 17.57 [95%CI 4.41;30.73) were found with genotype AA/GG. Genotype AA/AG presented higher FORT (EMD 13.47 [95%CI 2.51,24.42]), while more hypo-response (56.3% vs. 26.4%,adjOR 6.30 [95%CI 1.88;21.08]) and lower FOI (EMD -23.51 [95%CI -45.04;-1.97]) was reported with AG/AA. In accordance with our previous studies, FSHR polymorphisms have a statistically significant impact on OR, both individually and in association. However, only rs6166/rs1394205 genotype AA/GG seems to have a clinically significant effect, with a decrease in the prevalence of hypo-response, higher oocyte yield and increase in FOI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Best Practice Onkologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Introduction: This large multicenter study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes using three follitropin alfa preparations within a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol, while identifying contributing factors to cycle success. Methods: A retrospective, anonymized cohort analysis was conducted on donor-recipient cycles from 12 clinics during 2019 to 2021. 7389 oocyte donors underwent ovarian stimulation (OS) with three follitropin alfa preparations (Ovaleap® [n=3231], Bemfola® [n=3542], Gonal-F® [n=616]) were included. Stimulation began on cycle days 2 or 3 with daily administration of 150-225 IU follitropin alfa. 10 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) was administered daily until GnRH agonist trigger using a single dose of 0.2mg GnRH agonist for final follicular maturation. Statistical analysis included ANOVA, Chi-squared, and logistic regression. Results: Whilst there were some differences in patient and stimulation characteristics, including donor age and number of retrieved oocytes, clinical variables did not significantly differ among the three study groups. Linear regression revealed donor age [0.986 (0.974-0.999)] and number of mature oocytes [1.027 (1.007-1.047)] significantly impacted ongoing pregnancy rates, while the type of follitropin alfa [1.048 (0.956-1.149)] used did not. No significant differences were observed in the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) among oocytes obtained from stimulation with Bemfola (64.9%), Gonal-F (64.1%) and Ovaleap (66.1%), p= 0.385. Discussion: This study demonstrated comparable clinical outcomes and CLBR between biosimilars and the reference product of follitropin alfa within PPOS protocols, hence they are interchangeable in a real-world patient setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the comparative reproductive outcomes of ovarian stimulation combined with intrauterine insemination using partner's sperm (OS-IUI) in eumenorrheic and normogonadotropic oligomenorrheic women. Method: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including 3833 couples who underwent 5920 cycles of OS-IUI between June 2013 and March 2019. Participants were stratified into two cohorts based on menstrual regularity: eumenorrheic and normogonadotropic oligomenorrheic. The primary outcome measured was the live birth rate (LBR) per cycle and cumulative LBR per couple. Secondary outcomes encompassed the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per cycle, miscarriage rate, and multiple pregnancy rate. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to balance maternal baseline characteristics. Results: Prior to PSM, significant differences in CPR, LBR and cumulative LBR were observed between eumenorrheic and oligomenorrheic women, favoring the latter (CPR: 11.16% vs. 18.75%; LBR: 9.02% vs. 14.96%; cumulative LBR: 13.60% vs. 24.25%, P < 0.001). These differences persisted post-PSM (CPR: 9.74% vs. 19.29%; LBR: 7.30% vs. 16.29%; cumulative LBR 7.76% vs. 19.90%, P<0.001). Multivariate regression analyses revealed that menstrual status was a significant independent predictor of both CPR (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=1.83 before PSM, 2.24 after PSM) and LBR (adjusted OR=1.90 before PSM, 2.46 after PSM). In the subgroup analysis, female age was identified as the sole predictor of reproductive outcomes in oligomenorrheic women undergoing OS-IUI. Conversely, in eumenorrheic women, factors such as age, duration of infertility, body mass index (BMI), ovarian stimulation agents, and the number of dominant follicles were significant influencers of CPR and LBR. Conclusion: Normogonadotropic oligomenorrheic women demonstrated improved reproductive outcomes with OS-IUI, suggesting that tailored treatment strategies based on menstrual regularity could optimize success rates in infertility management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Currently, there is no consensus on the optimal management of women with low prognosis in ART. In this Delphi consensus, a panel of international experts provided real-world clinical perspectives on a series of literature-supported consensus statements regarding the overall relevance of the POSEIDON criteria for women with low prognosis in ART. Methods: Using a Delphi-consensus framework, twelve experts plus two Scientific Coordinators discussed and amended statements and supporting references proposed by the Scientific Coordinators (Round 1). Statements were distributed via an online survey to an extended panel of 53 experts, of whom 36 who voted anonymously on their level of agreement or disagreement with each statement using a six-point Likert-type scale (1 = Absolutely agree; 2 = More than agree; 3 = Agree; 4 = Disagree; 5 = More than disagree; 6 = Absolutely disagree) (Round 2). Consensus was reached if > 66% of participants agreed or disagreed. Results: The extended panel voted on seventeen statements and subcategorized them according to relevance. All but one statement reached consensus during the first round; the remaining statement reached consensus after rewording. Statements were categorized according to impact, low-prognosis validation, outcomes and patient management. The POSEIDON criteria are timely and clinically sound. The preferred success measure is cumulative live birth and key management strategies include the use of recombinant FSH preparations, supplementation with r-hLH, dose increases and oocyte/embryo accumulation through vitrification. Tools such as the ART Calculator and Follicle-to-Oocyte Index may be considered. Validation data from large, prospective studies in each POSEIDON group are now needed to corroborate existing retrospective data. Conclusions: This Delphi consensus provides an overview of expert opinion on the clinical implications of the POSEIDON criteria for women with low prognosis to ovarian stimulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: A Delphi consensus was performed to evaluate expert opinions on the management of key aspects of ovarian stimulation. Methods: A Scientific Committee developed eleven statements for patient profiles corresponding to predicted ovarian responses (low, normal, and high) based on antral follicle count (AFC) and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH). The statements were distributed (online survey) to French and Belgian fertility specialists. Consensus was reached when =66.7% of participants agreed or disagreed. Results: Among 52 respondents, a consensus agreement was reached for each patient profile for personalizing the initial dose of gonadotropin, taking age, weight, body mass index, nature of the cycle, and the decision to perform a fresh transfer or a freeze-all strategy into consideration. The respondents preferred a fresh transfer for low and normal responders and a freeze-all strategy in case of high risk of hyperstimulation, newly diagnosed uterine or tubal pathology and premature progesterone elevation. A consensus was reached for 10-15 oocytes as optimal oocyte target from the first round of voting. The panel agreed to increase the gonadotropin dose in case of insufficient response and preferred a GnRH antagonist protocol for a subsequent cycle in case of excessive response. Finally, a consensual answer was obtained for using LH/hCG activity in case of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, advanced age, inadequate response during first stimulation and suspected FSH receptor polymorphism. Discussion: The AMPLITUDE consensus supports the importance of optimizing the ovarian stimulation protocol for patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment. Additional studies could complete these findings and guide fertility specialists in their daily practice to improve ovarian stimulation outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Is it safe and effective to perform controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and oocyte retrieval (OR) in prepubertal and peripubertal patients? Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, data of 20 pre-/peripubertal patients who underwent COS and OR for the purpose of oocyte cryopreservation (OC) between 2008 and 2023 were reviewed. Following COS, all OR procedures were performed transabdominally using a vaginal ultrasound probe. Ovarian reserve was assessed by serum FSH, LH, estradiol, AMH, and antral follicle counts (AFC) in all subjects. All mature oocytes were vitrified. Results: Mean age of the patients was 15.05 ± 1.87, mean AMH was 0.84 ± 0.8 ng/ml, mean FSH was 6.39 ± 3.95 IU/L, mean estradiol was 61.6 ± 51.9 pg/ml, mean LH was 4.69 ± 3.46 IU/L, and mean AFC was 5.5 ± 5.82. Among the patients, 12 had regular menstrual cycle, 5 had irregular menstrual cycle, whereas 3 patients still did not have their menarche yet. The indications for OC were as follows: primary ovarian insufficiency (n = 7), ovarian surgery for ovarian tumors (n = 5) or ovarian torsion (n = 1), mosaic Turner syndrome (n = 2), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 1) anaplastic B-cell lymphoma (n = 1), Ewing's sarcoma (n = 1), Noonan syndrome (n = 1), and Thalassemia (n = 1). The mean number of oocytes retrieved, MII oocytes frozen, and maturation rate were 5.11 ± 5.0, 3.92 ± 4.48, and 75.1 ± 25.6%, respectively. Stepwise linear regression analysis demonstrated a positive correlation between AFC and number of total oocytes retrieved and number of MII oocytes. In the case diagnosed with Noonan syndrome, all 7 retrieved oocytes were MI and all frozen at MI phase. No patient had any complication related to COS or OR. Conclusion: Even though number of the enrolled subjects is limited and mean AMH is lower in our cohort, we demonstrated that performing COS and OR is safe in pre-/peripubertal patients. If required, transabdominal route can be performed in this age group for OR. AFC appears as a prognostic factor for stimulation outcome in this age group. Pediatric patients or young adolescents at risk for primary ovarian insufficiency should not be discouraged from utilizing OC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Planned oocyte cryopreservation (OC) has the potential to address the burden of the biological clock, giving women and individuals with ovaries more autonomy in choosing when to have children and with whom. In the United States, the annual number of OC cycles has grown significantly, yet many questions remain regarding planned OC. The field is starting to gather data on the clinical practice and social perspectives around planned oocyte cryopreservation, including the optimal age range at which to offer planned OC, what factors are most predictive of a successful outcome, and the optimal number of oocytes and ovarian stimulation cycles to achieve a live birth. There is a clear need for setting realistic expectations about the chance of success with OC; however, most patients have yet to return to thaw their oocytes, and outcomes data are limited. Clinical models have been developed to predict OC success based on surrogate markers such as age, number of oocytes retrieved, and anti-Müllerian hormone level. Patient education should emphasize the age-related decline in fertility, that eggs do not equal embryos, and that more than one cycle may be needed to obtain sufficient oocytes to have a reasonable chance of future success. While planned OC is not quite an insurance policy against future reproductive challenges, it provides the best option to date for expanding the reproductive window and maximizing reproductive options while navigating individual life circumstances in the context of family building. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare differences in euploidy rates for blastocysts in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) long and short protocols, GnRH-antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol, progestin-primed ovarian stimulation and mild stimulation protocols, and other ovary stimulation protocols. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study from the Assisted Reproductive Medicine Department of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital. A total of 1657 PGT-A cycles with intracytoplasmic sperm injection after different controlled ovary hyperstimulation protocols were analyzed, and a total of 3154 embryos were biopsied. Differences in euploidy rate per embryo biopsied, embryo euploidy rate per oocyte retrieved and cycle cancellation rate were compared. Results: For the PGT-A cycles, the euploidy rate per embryo biopsied was lower in the GnRH-ant protocol than in the GnRH-a long protocol (53.26 vs. 58.68%, respectively). Multiple linear regression showed that the GnRH-ant protocol was associated with a lower euploidy rate per embryo biopsied (β = −0.079, p = 0.011). The euploidy rate per embryo biopsied was not affected by total gonadotropin dosage, duration of stimulation and number of oocytes retrieved. The embryo euploidy rate per oocyte retrieved was similar in all protocols and was negatively correlated with the total number of oocytes retrieved (β = −0.003, p = 0.003). Conclusion: Compared with the GnRH-a long protocol, the GnRH-ant protocol was associated with a lower euploidy rate per embryo biopsied. The total gonadotropin dosage, duration of stimulation and number of oocytes retrieved did not appear to significantly influence euploidy rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Exogenous gonadotropin-controlled ovarian stimulation is the critical step in animal reproductive management, such as pig, sheep, bovine and other species. It helps synchronize ovulation or stimulate multiple ovulations. However, a number of evidence indicated an unexpected decrease in pregnancy outcomes following ovarian stimulation. This study aimed to explore the underlying mechanism of the pregnancy defect and develop a practical rescue strategy. Results Compared with those in the control group, gilts that underwent ovarian stimulation showed a decrease in pregnancy rate, farrowing rate, and total number of piglets born. Stimulated gilts also showed an increase in estradiol (E2) levels. The supraphysiological E2 level was correlated with the decrease in the number of piglets born. Furthermore, we found that high levels of E2 impair uterine receptivity, as shown by the overproliferation of endometrial epithelial cells. In vitro mechanistic studies demonstrated that high levels of E2 hyperactivate FGF-FGFR-ERK signaling cascade in the uterine endometrium, and in turn induces overproliferation of endometrial epithelial cells. Of note, N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) supplementation effectively inhibits ERK hyperphosphorylation and ameliorates endometrial epithelial overproliferation. Importantly, in vivo experiments indicated that dietary NAC supplementation, compared with ovarian stimulation group, improves the uterine receptivity in gilts, and significantly increases the pregnancy rate and total number of piglets born. Conclusions Ovarian stimulation-induced supraphysiological levels of E2 impairs uterine receptivity by hyperactivating FGF-FGFR-ERK signaling cascade, thereby reducing pregnancy rate and litter size. Supplementing NAC to a conventional diet for gilts ameliorates hyperactivated ERK signaling and improves uterine receptivity, thus rescuing adverse pregnancy outcomes following ovarian stimulation. Graphical Abstract

Abstract Social elective egg freezing (EEF) is now widely used globally but in many countries is unaffordable to many women because of high costs and lacking insurance coverage. Efforts to reduce costs, therefore, are of importance. Surprisingly, a simple, well-defined and practical approach ensuring optimal outcomes for EEF has, however, so-far not been published. We, therefore, conducted a narrative review of the literature for relevant articles regarding the different steps of ovarian stimulation (OS) in the EEF process, in order to define such a standard protocol. This review revealed that in order to maximize oocyte yields with minimal number of OS cycles - while ensuring patient safety - a multiple-dose GnRH antagonist protocol with a daily gonadotropin dose of 300 IU appears best, unless patients demonstrate a polycystic ovarian phenotype, suggestive of likely high responses. The initial gonadotropin should be recFSH, while LH supplementation should be co-administered with the addition of GnRH antagonist. Final follicular maturation should be triggered by GnRH agonist trigger, with a dual trigger (1000–1500 IU hCG) considered for suboptimal responders to GnRH agonist trigger, optionally with Cabergoline to mitigate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in high responders.

Abstract Background The two main input indicators needed to assess the success of assisted reproductive technology (ART) strategies are cost-effectiveness and clinical outcome. Therefore, we focused in our study on the direct cost associated with the Progesterone Prime Ovulation Induction Protocol (P-P-OP protocol) compared to other protocols, and the clinical outcomes of this strategy were measured in their effect on implantation and pregnancy rates. Methods A pilot single-armed study was conducted on 47 infertile women coming for an ICSI cycle. Progesterone priming was started with 10 mg dydrogesterone along with HMG 150–300 IU from the second day of the menstrual cycle and was maintained until the day of ovulation trigger. The primary outcome was the cost per cycle, while the secondary outcome was the clinical pregnancy rate. The cost per cycle, including the cryopreservation cost, was calculated for economic evaluation. Results Per each cycle, the number of retrieved oocytes was 14.87 ± 8.09, the number of mature oocytes was 9.81 ± 4.67, the number of total embryos was 8.74 ± 4.28 (grade A = 67.40%, grade B = 11.92%, grade C = 20.68%), and the number of transferred embryos was 2.43 ± 0.68. The clinical pregnancy rate in our study was 42.5%. Economically, the cost of the P-P-OP protocol for each patient was only 56 USD. Conclusion The P-P-OP protocol is a simplified approach suitable for freeze-only strategies, offering the benefits of positive results, fewer injections, lower costs, and increased patient convenience.

Abstract Background Currently, there is no consensus on the optimal management of women with low prognosis in ART. In this Delphi consensus, a panel of international experts provided real-world clinical perspectives on a series of literature-supported consensus statements regarding the overall relevance of the POSEIDON criteria for women with low prognosis in ART. Methods Using a Delphi-consensus framework, twelve experts plus two Scientific Coordinators discussed and amended statements and supporting references proposed by the Scientific Coordinators (Round 1). Statements were distributed via an online survey to an extended panel of 53 experts, of whom 36 who voted anonymously on their level of agreement or disagreement with each statement using a six-point Likert-type scale (1 = Absolutely agree; 2 = More than agree; 3 = Agree; 4 = Disagree; 5 = More than disagree; 6 = Absolutely disagree) (Round 2). Consensus was reached if > 66% of participants agreed or disagreed. Results The extended panel voted on seventeen statements and subcategorized them according to relevance. All but one statement reached consensus during the first round; the remaining statement reached consensus after rewording. Statements were categorized according to impact, low-prognosis validation, outcomes and patient management. The POSEIDON criteria are timely and clinically sound. The preferred success measure is cumulative live birth and key management strategies include the use of recombinant FSH preparations, supplementation with r-hLH, dose increases and oocyte/embryo accumulation through vitrification. Tools such as the ART Calculator and Follicle-to-Oocyte Index may be considered. Validation data from large, prospective studies in each POSEIDON group are now needed to corroborate existing retrospective data. Conclusions This Delphi consensus provides an overview of expert opinion on the clinical implications of the POSEIDON criteria for women with low prognosis to ovarian stimulation.

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) treatment in comparison to those of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists for the prevention of premature luteinizing hormone surges during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (OS) and the impact of these effects on developing embryos and pregnancy outcomes. Data from 757 cycles of GnRH antagonist treatment and 756 cycles of MPA treatment were evaluated at the Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine Assisted Reproductive Treatment Center between October 2018 and April 2022. Patient records were obtained from the electronic database of the centre and analysed. In our centre, GnRH antagonist protocols were used between 2018 and 2020, and MPA protocols were used between 2020 and 2022. We chose our study population by year. Our study is a comparative retrospective study. All methods in this study were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Patients using MPA were significantly older (33.9 ± 5.6 vs. 32.6 ± 5.6, p

Introduction: In some cases, infertile patients have poor ovarian response, so it is necessary to obtain the right number of oocytes with proper stimulation. The number of oocytes obtained is directly related to fertility success. This study was conducted with aim to compare two methods of double stimulation and two regular sequential stimulations and their relationship with pregnancy outcomes.Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted in Shariati Hospital of Tehran in 2022-2023. A total of 140 women with poor ovarian response based on Bologna criteria who underwent oocyte puncture were selected for in vitro fertilization. Among these, 70 women with double stimulation and 70 women with two consecutive normal stimulations after embryo transfer were compared in terms of clinical pregnancy rate and cumulative live birth rate. T-test or Mann-Whitney test was used to examine quantitative variables and chi-square test was used to examine qualitative variables. Data analysis was done using SPSS statistical software (version 24). P

Objective: To explore the use of weekly continuous dosing of corifollitropin α in DuoStim cycles. Design: Pilot-matched case-control study. Setting: Private fertility center. Patient(s): Cases were defined as DuoStim cycles performed from November 2022 to May 2023 receiving weekly continuous dosing of corifollitropin α (n = 15). Controls were chosen from a database comprising DuoStim cycles conducted at our institution during the years 2021/2022. Matching was done on a 1-to-1 basis, based on antimüllerian hormone values (±0.4 pmol/L) and age (n = 15). Intervention(s): Injections of corifollitropin α once every 8 days, along with uninterrupted oral administration of micronized progesterone 200 mg/d (for luteinizing hormone surge prevention) throughout the follicular and luteal phases for ovarian stimulation. Oocyte retrieval. Main outcome measure(s): Total number of cumulus-oocyte complexes and metaphase II oocytes obtained in follicular + luteal phase stimulation. Secondary outcomes evaluated fertilization rates, number of blastocysts, days of stimulation, number of injectables required, and gonadotropin cost. Result(s): The study group achieved similar total oocyte and MII yield vs. daily follicle-stimulating hormone protocol (13.3 ± 6.9 vs. 11.8 ± 6.1 and 10.4 ± 6.3 vs. 9.2 ± 4.6, respectively). All secondary outcomes showed no significant differences. The study group experienced a significant reduction of injections to complete a DuoStim cycle (4.5 ± 1.4 vs. 35.2 ± 12.2; mean deviation -30.7; 95% confidence interval, −37.5– to −23.9)]. Conclusion(s): Corifollitropin α on a weekly basis throughout a DuoStim cycle yields an equivalent number of oocytes as standard daily follicle-stimulating hormone administration while drastically reducing the number of required injections. Trial registration number: NCT05815719. EudraCT: 2022-003177-32.

To study the relationship between neighborhood deprivation index (NDI) and markers of ovarian reserve and outcomes of controlled ovarian stimulation among young, healthy oocyte donors. Retrospective cohort study. A total of 547 oocyte donors who underwent 905 oocyte retrieval cycles (2008–2020) at a private fertility center in Sandy Springs, Georgia, United States. Neighborhood deprivation index was calculated using principal component analysis applied to census-level measures of poverty, employment, household composition, and public assistance, which was then standardized and linked to donor information on the basis of donor residence. Markers of ovarian reserve, including antral follicle count (AFC) and antimüllerian hormone (AMH) levels, and outcomes of controlled ovarian stimulation including number of total and mature oocytes retrieved and ovarian sensitivity index (OSI) (defined as the number of oocytes retrieved/total gonadotropin dose × 1,000). Multivariable generalized estimating equations with Poisson and normal distribution were used to model the relationship between NDI and outcome measures adjusting for age, body mass index, and year of retrieval. The mean (SD) age of donors was 25.0 (2.8) years and 29% of the donors were racial or ethnic minorities. There were no associations between donor NDI and ovarian reserve markers. For every interquartile range increase in NDI, there was a reduction of −1.5% (95% confidence interval: −5.3% to 2.4%) in total oocytes retrieved although the effect estimate was imprecise. Associations of NDI with a number of mature oocytes retrieved and OSI were in a similar direction. We observed evidence for effect modification of the NDI and OSI association by donor race. There was a suggestive positive association between NDI and OSI in Black donors but no association in White donors. In this cohort of young, healthy, racially diverse oocyte donors, we found little evidence of associations between NDI and markers of ovarian reserve or outcomes of ovarian stimulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

STUDY QUESTION What is the relationship between late follicular phase progesterone levels and clinic pregnancy and live birth rates in couples with unexplained infertility undergoing ovarian stimulation with IUI (OS-IUI)? SUMMARY ANSWER Late follicular progesterone levels between 1.0 and <1.5 ng/ml were associated with higher live birth and clinical pregnancy rates while the outcomes in groups with higher progesterone levels did not differ appreciably from the <1.0 ng/ml reference group. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Elevated late follicular progesterone levels have been associated with lower live birth rates after fresh embryo transfer following controlled ovarian stimulation and egg retrieval, but less is known about whether an association exists with outcomes in OS-IUI cycles. Existing studies are few and have been limited to ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophins, but the use of oral agents, such as clomiphene citrate and letrozole, is common with these treatments and has not been well studied. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The study was a prospective cohort analysis of the Assessment of Multiple Intrauterine Gestations from Ovarian Stimulation (AMIGOS) randomized controlled trial. Frozen serum was available for evaluation from 2121 cycles in 828 AMIGOS participants. The primary pregnancy outcome was live birth per cycle, and the secondary pregnancy outcome was clinical pregnancy rate per cycle. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Couples with unexplained infertility in the AMIGOS trial, for whom female serum from day of trigger with hCG was available in at least one cycle of treatment, were included. Stored frozen serum samples from day of hCG trigger during treatment with OS-IUI were evaluated for serum progesterone level. Progesterone level <1.0 ng/ml was the reference group for comparison with progesterone categorized in increments of 0.5 ng/ml up to ≥3.0 ng/ml. Unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios (RR) and 95% CI were estimated using cluster-weighted generalized estimating equations to estimate modified Poisson regression models with robust standard errors. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Compared to the reference group with 110/1363 live births (8.07%), live birth rates were significantly increased in cycles with progesterone 1.0 to <1.5 ng/ml (49/401 live births, 12.22%) in both the unadjusted (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.14, 2.13) and treatment-adjusted models (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.10, 2.06). Clinical pregnancy rates were also higher in this group (55/401 clinical pregnancies, 13.72%) compared to reference group with 130/1363 (9.54%) (unadjusted RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.10, 1.94 and adjusted RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.07, 1.89). In cycles with progesterone 1.5 ng/ml and above, there was no evidence of a difference in clinical pregnancy or live birth rates relative to the reference group. This pattern remained when stratified by ovarian stimulation treatment group but was only statistically significant in letrozole cycles. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The AMIGOS trial was not designed to answer this clinical question, and with small numbers in some progesterone categories our analyses were underpowered to detect differences between some groups. Inclusion of cycles with progesterone values above 3.0 ng/ml may have included those wherein ovulation had already occurred at the time the IUI was performed. These cycles would be expected to experience a lower success rate but pregnancy may have occurred with intercourse in the same cycle. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Compared to previous literature focusing primarily on OS-IUI cycles using gonadotrophins, these data include patients using oral agents and therefore may be generalizable to the wider population of infertility patients undergoing IUI treatments. Because live births were significantly higher when progesterone ranged from 1.0 to <1.5 ng/ml, further study is needed to clarify whether this progesterone range may truly represent a prognostic indicator in OS-IUI cycles. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) Oklahoma Shared Clinical and Translational Resources (U54GM104938) National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS). AMIGOS was funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development: U10 HD077680, U10 HD39005, U10 HD38992, U10 HD27049, U10 HD38998, U10 HD055942, HD055944, U10 HD055936, and U10HD055925. Research made possible by the funding by American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Dr Burks has disclosed that she is a member of the Board of Directors of the Pacific Coast Reproductive Society. Dr Hansen has disclosed that he is the recipient of NIH grants unrelated to the present work, and contracts with Ferring International Pharmascience Center US and with May Health unrelated to the present work, as well as consulting fees with May Health also unrelated to the present work. Dr Diamond has disclosed that he is a stockholder and a member of the Board of Directors of Advanced Reproductive Care, Inc. and that he has a patent pending for the administration of progesterone to trigger ovulation. Dr Anderson, Dr Gavrizi, and Dr Peck do not have conflicts of interest to disclose. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) treatment in comparison to those of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists for the prevention of premature luteinizing hormone surges during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (OS) and the impact of these effects on developing embryos and pregnancy outcomes. Data from 757 cycles of GnRH antagonist treatment and 756 cycles of MPA treatment were evaluated at the Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine Assisted Reproductive Treatment Center between October 2018 and April 2022. Patient records were obtained from the electronic database of the centre and analysed. In our centre, GnRH antagonist protocols were used between 2018 and 2020, and MPA protocols were used between 2020 and 2022. We chose our study population by year. Our study is a comparative retrospective study. All methods in this study were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Patients using MPA were significantly older (33.9 ± 5.6 vs. 32.6 ± 5.6, p < 0.001) and had a lower number of antral follicles (AFC) (10.7 ± 8.6 vs. 11.9 ± 10.8, p = 0.007) than those using GnRH antagonists. Both MPA (2.9%) and GnRH antagonists (2.2%) had similar effectiveness in preventing premature ovulation (p = 0.415). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the number of total developed embryos (1.3 ± 1.3 vs. 1.2 ± 1.2, p = 0.765). There was no significant difference in the clinical pregnancy rates with the first ET (%35.4 vs. %30.1, p = 0.074), per total number of transfers (35.3% vs. 30.1%, p = 0.077). MPA was found to be effective at preventing premature ovulation during OS treatment, and the incidence of developing embryo and pregnancy outcomes in patients using MPA were similar to those in patients using GnRH antagonists. Therefore, the use of MPA instead of GnRH antagonists during OS may be a viable alternative for patients not scheduled for fresh ET. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine whether endometrial thickness (EMT) differs between i) clomiphene citrate (CC) and gonadotropin (Gn) utilizing patients as their own controls, and ii) patients who conceived with CC and those who did not. Furthermore, to investigate the association between late-follicular EMT and pregnancy outcomes, in CC and Gn cycles. Methods: Retrospective study. Three sets of analyses were conducted separately for the purpose of this study. In analysis 1, we included all cycles from women who initially underwent CC/IUI (CC1, n=1252), followed by Gn/IUI (Gn1, n=1307), to compare EMT differences between CC/IUI and Gn/IUI, utilizing women as their own controls. In analysis 2, we included all CC/IUI cycles (CC2, n=686) from women who eventually conceived with CC during the same study period, to evaluate EMT differences between patients who conceived with CC (CC2) and those who did not (CC1). In analysis 3, pregnancy outcomes among different EMT quartiles were evaluated in CC/IUI and Gn/IUI cycles, separately, to investigate the potential association between EMT and pregnancy outcomes. Results: In analysis 1, when CC1 was compared to Gn1 cycles, EMT was noted to be significantly thinner [Median (IQR): 6.8 (5.5-8.0) vs. 8.3 (7.0-10.0) mm, p<0.001]. Within-patient, CC1 compared to Gn1 EMT was on average 1.7mm thinner. Generalized linear mixed models, adjusted for confounders, revealed similar results (coefficient: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.52-1.85, CC1 as ref.). In analysis 2, CC1 was compared to CC2 EMT, the former being thinner both before [Median (IQR): 6.8 (5.5-8.0) vs. 7.2 (6.0-8.9) mm, p<0.001] and after adjustment (coefficient: 0.59, 95%CI: 0.34-0.85, CC1 as ref.). In analysis 3, clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs) and ongoing pregnancy rates (OPRs) improved as EMT quartiles increased (Q1 to Q4) among CC cycles (p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively), while no such trend was observed among Gn cycles (p=0.94, p=0.68, respectively). Generalized estimating equations models, adjusted for confounders, suggested that EMT was positively associated with CPR and OPR in CC cycles, but not in Gn cycles. Conclusions: Within-patient, CC generally resulted in thinner EMT compared to Gn. Thinner endometrium was associated with decreased OPR in CC cycles, while no such association was detected in Gn cycles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims In the field of infertility treatments, intrauterine insemination (IUI), with or without ovulation stimulation, is considered the first line of intervention. This study aimed to assess the relationship between various factors and the rates of biochemical and clinical pregnancy following IUI treatment over a five-year period. Instrument & Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted at Kashan, Iran, 2023. The medical records of patients diagnosed with infertility and treated with IUI at the infertility center in Kashan were reviewed. The primary outcomes were biochemical and clinical pregnancy rates, along with associated factors. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square test and independent t-tests, with statistical significance set at p=0.05. Findings A total of 334 patients were included in the study. The mean age of those with positive biochemical (p<0.006) and clinical pregnancy outcomes (p<0.008) was significantly lower compared to those who did not achieve pregnancy. A significant correlation was found between endometrial thickness and both biochemical (p<0.002) and clinical pregnancy rates (p<0.007). However, no significant associations were observed between the other variables and pregnancy outcomes. Conclusion Increasing maternal age is associated with a decline in biochemical and clinical pregnancy rates. In contrast, an increase in endometrial thickness positively correlates with higher biochemical and clinical pregnancy rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate whether the ovarian stimulation with follitropin delta in an individualized algorithm-based manner is inferior to recombinant human-follicle stimulating's follitropin alfa or follitropin beta conventional dosing regarding a series of established primary endpoints. Methods: We conducted a registered systematic review (CRD42024512792) on PubMed-MEDLINE, Web of Science™, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. Our search was designed to cover all relevant literature, particularly randomized controlled trials. We critically and comparatively analyzed the outcomes for each primary endpoint based on the intervention, reflected by the positive βhCG test, clinical pregnancy, vital pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, live birth, live birth at 4 weeks, and multiple pregnancies. Results: Six randomized controlled trials were included in the quality assessment as priority manuscripts, revealing an 83.3% low risk of bias. Follitropin delta led to non-significant differences in each parameter of interest from positive βhCG test (691; 53.44% vs. 602; 46.55%), ongoing pregnancies (603; 53.79% vs. 518; 46.20%), clinical and vital pregnancies (1,073; 52.80% vs. 959; 47.19%), to live birth and at 4 weeks (595; 54.14% vs. 504; 45.85%) with only 2 losses, and even multiple pregnancies (8; 66.66% vs. 4; 33.33%). However, follitropin delta was well-tolerated among hypo- and hyper-responders without significant risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and/or preventive interventions in contrast with follitropin alfa or follitropin beta. Conclusion: The personalized individualized-based algorithm dosing with follitropin delta is non-inferior to conventional follitropin alfa or follitropin beta. It is as effective in promoting a similar response in women without significant comparable adverse effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To investigate treatment approaches for fertility preservation patients, with a focus on timing of oocyte retrieval, and to determine whether their characteristics differ from those of other IVF patients. Additionally, to evaluate the significance of follicle size on triggering day in the context of fertility preservation. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary, university-affiliated medical center. It compared 140 matched patients undergoing social fertility preservation to 140 patients undergoing IVF treatment due to male factor infertility. Results: Patients undergoing fertility preservation received a higher initial gonadotropin dose and had more oocytes retrieved than the control group. Within the fertility preservation cohort, a negative correlation was observed between the rate of large follicles and the number of retrieved oocytes. While there was no significant association between rate of large follicles and oocyte maturation rate in the entire group, age-stratified analysis revealed a negative relationship. Analysis revealed that although traditional treatment determinants such as follicular size and gonadotropin dosing were considered, peak estradiol levels were consistently identified as significant predictors of treatment outcomes. Conclusions: Physicians may modify treatments for fertility preservation, emphasizing a higher gonadotropin dosage to maximize oocyte retrieval. Elevated estradiol levels can serve as a real-time predictive marker for the number of mature oocytes. While treatment strategies can influence outcomes, intrinsic patient factors, particularly baseline ovarian function, remain crucial. These results challenge beliefs regarding the importance of larger follicles and suggest the need for a tailored approach, considering patient age and specific fertility preservation objectives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To study the primary objective of clinical pregnancy (CP) rate per ovarian stimulation with intrauterine insemination (OS-IUI) treatment cycle in patients with repetitive cycles up to a maximum of 8 cycles. Retrospective cohort. Large fertility clinic. A total of 37,565 consecutive OS-IUI cycles from 18,509 patients were included in this study. Those with anovulatory diagnoses, tubal factor infertility, male factor infertility, using donor sperm, canceled cycles, and those with missing data for either baseline characteristics or outcome were excluded. The CP rate was analyzed using generalized estimating equations and controlled for age, stimulation protocol, and body mass index. Clinical pregnancy was defined as intrauterine gestation with fetal heartbeat visible on ultrasound. A total of 37,565 consecutive OS-IUI cycles from 2002 through 2019 at a private practice facility were evaluated. All cycles met inclusion criteria and were used in generalized estimating equation modeling. Patients aged <35 years comprised 47.6% of the cohort. After adjustment for confounders, the mean predicted probability of CP for cycles one to 8 was 15.7% per cycle. The mean predicted probability of CP in aggregated data from cycles 2 to 4 was only 1.7% lower compared with cycle 1 as the referent (16.7% vs. 15.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2nd: 0.88 {0.82, 0.95}, 3rd: 0.86 {0.79, 0.93}, 4th: 0.88 {0.79, 0.98}). However, the 15.0% mean predicted probability of CP for the second through the fourth cycle was concordant with the mean for all included cycles (15.7%). The mean predicted probability of CP of cycles 5 to 8 was not significantly different compared with the referent (16.7% vs. 16.1%, 95% CI 5th: 0.97 [0.85, 1.11], 6th: 0.93 [0.79, 1.10], 7th: 1.01 [0.81, 1.26], 8th: 1.01 [0.76, 1.34]). The modeling of consecutive cycles suggested that the adjusted cumulative predicted probability of CP from OS-IUI continues to increase with each of the 8 successive cycles. Clinical pregnancy rates are satisfactory in up to 8 consecutive OS-IUI treatment cycles. These data are useful for counseling, especially in those patients for whom in vitro fertilization is not financially or ethically feasible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

STUDY QUESTION How does a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist versus a GnRH antagonist protocol affect ovarian response when using an individualized fixed daily dose of follitropin delta for ovarian stimulation? SUMMARY ANSWER The BEYOND trial data demonstrate thatindividualized fixed-dose follitropin delta is effective when used in a GnRH agonist protocol, compared with a GnRH antagonist protocol, in women with anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) ≤35 pmol/l and no increased risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The efficacy and safety of an individualized fixed daily dose of follitropin delta (based on body weight and AMH) have been established in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using a GnRH antagonist protocol. Preliminary study data indicate that individualized follitropin delta is also efficacious in a GnRH agonist protocol (RAINBOW trial, NCT03564509). There are no prospective comparative data using individualized follitropin delta for ovarian stimulation in a GnRH agonist versus a GnRH antagonist protocol. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This is the first randomized, controlled, open-label, multi-centre trial exploring efficacy and safety of individualized follitropin delta dosing in a GnRH agonist versus a GnRH antagonist protocol in participants undergoing their first ovarian stimulation cycle for IVF/ICSI. A total of 437 participants were randomized centrally and stratified by centre and age. The primary endpoint was the number of oocytes retrieved. Secondary endpoints included ongoing pregnancy rates, adverse drug reactions (including OHSS), live births, and neonatal outcomes. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Participants (18–40 years; AMH ≤35 pmol/l) were enrolled at specialist reproductive health clinics in Austria, Denmark, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, and Switzerland. The mean number of oocytes retrieved was compared between the GnRH agonist and antagonist protocols using a negative binomial regression model with age and AMH at screening as factors. Analyses were based on all randomized subjects, using a multiple imputation method for randomized subjects withdrawing before the start of stimulation. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Of the 437 randomized subjects, 221 were randomized to the GnRH agonist, and 216 were randomized to the GnRH antagonist protocol. The participants had a mean age of 32.3 ± 4.3 years and a mean serum AMH of 16.6 ± 7.8 pmol/l. A total of 202 and 204 participants started ovarian stimulation with follitropin delta in the GnRH agonist and antagonist groups, respectively. The mean number of oocytes retrieved was statistically significantly higher in the agonist group (11.1 ± 5.9) versus the antagonist group (9.6 ± 5.5), with an estimated mean difference of 1.31 oocytes (95% CI: 0.22; 2.40, P  =   0.0185). The difference in number of oocytes retrieved was influenced by the patients' age and ovarian reserve, with a greater difference observed in patients aged <35 years and in patients with high ovarian reserve (AMH >15 pmol/l). Both the GnRH agonist and antagonist groups had a similar proportion of cycle cancellations (2.0% [4/202] versus 3.4% [7/204]) and fresh blastocyst transfer cancellations (13.4% [27/202] versus 14.7% [30/204]). The estimated ongoing pregnancy rate per started cycle was numerically higher in the GnRH agonist group (36.9% versus 29.1%; difference: 7.74% [95% CI: −1.49; 16.97, P  =   0.1002]). The most commonly reported adverse events (≥1% in either group; headache, OHSS, nausea, pelvic pain, or discomfort and abdominal pain) were similar in both groups. The incidence of early moderate/severe OHSS was low (1.5% for the agonist group versus 2.5% for antagonist groups). Estimated live birth rates per started cycle were 35.8% and 28.7% in the GnRH agonist and antagonist groups, respectively (treatment difference 7.15%; 95% CI: −2.02; 16.31; P  =   0.1265). The two treatment groups were comparable with respect to neonatal health data for singletons and twins and for incidence of congenital malformations (2.7% and 3.3% for the GnRH agonist versus antagonist groups, respectively). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION All participants had AMH ≤35 pmol/l and were ≤40 years old. Clinicians should remain cautious when using a GnRH agonist protocol in patients with AMH >35 pmol/l (i.e. those with an increased OHSS risk). The incidence of OHSS in the GnRH antagonist group may have been lower if a GnRH agonist trigger had been allowed. Outcomes of transfers with cryopreserved blastocysts were not followed up, therefore the cumulative live birth rates and neonatal outcomes after cryotransfer are unknown. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS In women with AMH ≤35 pmol/l, an individualized fixed daily dose of follitropin delta resulted in a significantly higher number of oocytes retrieved when used in a GnRH agonist protocol compared with a GnRH antagonist protocol, with no additional safety signals observed and no additional risk of OHSS. Live birth rates following ovarian stimulation with individualized follitropin delta were not statistically different between the GnRH protocols; however, the trial was not powered to assess this endpoint. There were no safety concerns with respect to neonatal health after ovarian stimulation with follitropin delta in either protocol. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The trial was funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals. EE, EP, and MS have no competing interests. AP has received research support from Ferring, and Gedeon Richter, and honoraria or consultation fees from Preglem, Novo Nordisk, Ferring, Gedeon Richter, Cryos, Merck A/S. BC has received consulting fees from Ferring and Merck, and his department received fees from Ferring to cover the costs of patient enrolment. MBS has received support to attend meetings and/or travel from Ferring, and was a board member for FertiPROTEKT e.V. until 2023. JS has received honoraria or consultation fees from Ferring and Merck, and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Ferring, Merck, and GoodLife. TS has received support/travel expenses from Ferring for attending a congress meeting, and participated in an advisory board for Merck. YS has received grants/research support from Ferring and support to attend a professional society congress meeting from Merck. RL and PP are employees of Ferring Pharmaceuticals. PP is a BOD member of PharmaBiome and owns stocks of Takeda Pharmaceuticals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03809429; EudraCT Number 2017-002783-40. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE 7 April 2019. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT 2 May 2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) binds to its membrane receptor (FSHR) in granulosa cells to activate various signal transduction pathways and drive the gonadotropin-dependent phase of folliculogenesis. Both FSH insufficiency (due to genetic or nongenetic factors) and FSH excess (as encountered with ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology [ART]) can cause poor female reproductive outcomes, but the underlying molecular mechanisms remain elusive. Herein, we conducted single-follicle and single-oocyte RNA sequencing analysis along with other approaches in an ex vivo mouse folliculogenesis and oogenesis system to investigate the effects of different concentrations of FSH on key follicular events. Our study revealed that a minimum FSH threshold is required for follicle maturation into the high estradiol-secreting preovulatory stage, and such threshold is moderately variable among individual follicles between 5 and 10 mIU/mL. FSH at 5, 10, 20, and 30 mIU/mL induced distinct expression patterns of follicle maturation–related genes, follicular transcriptomics, and follicular cAMP levels. RNA sequencing analysis identified FSH-stimulated activation of G proteins and downstream canonical and novel signaling pathways that may critically regulate follicle maturation, including the cAMP/PKA/CREB, PI3K/AKT/FOXO1, and glycolysis pathways. High FSH at 20 and 30 mIU/mL resulted in noncanonical FSH responses, including premature luteinization, high production of androgen and proinflammatory factors, and reduced expression of energy metabolism-related genes in oocytes. Together, this study improves our understanding of gonadotropin-dependent folliculogenesis and provides crucial insights into how high doses of FSH used in ART may impact follicular health, oocyte quality, pregnancy outcome, and systemic health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the therapeutic effects of rFSH versus uFSH/uHMG on ovarian stimulation in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Methods: The databases of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched to retrieve data on eligible trials from inception until July 2022. The relative risks (RRs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were applied to assess categorical and continuous outcomes, and the pooled results were calculated using the random-effects model. Sensitivity, subgroup, and publication bias analyses were also performed. Results: Forty-eight trials that enrolled 10,127 women were included in this quantitative meta-analysis. There were no significant differences between rFSH and uFSH/uHMG in the clinical pregnancy rate (RR: 1.01; 95% CI 0.95–1.07; P = 0.760), live birth rate (RR: 0.98; 95% CI 0.91–1.06; P = 0.665), multiple pregnancy rate (RR: 0.92; 95% CI 0.77–1.09; P = 0.320), miscarriage rate (RR: 1.17; 95% CI 0.94–1.46; P = 0.151), and the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (RR: 1.25; 95% CI 0.91–1.70; P = 0.164). In addition, the administration of rFSH was associated with a higher number of oocyte retrieval compared with that of uFSH/uHMG (WMD: 0.61; 95% CI 0.03–1.20; P = 0.038), while no significant differences were found between rFSH and uFSH/uHMG in the dosage of gonadotrophin (WMD: 14.80; 95% CI − 136.97 to 166.57; P = 0.848) and the duration of ovarian stimulation (WMD: − 0.26; 95% CI − 0.62 to 0.10; P = 0.152). Thus, the exploratory analyses revealed several potential differences in the effects of rFSH versus uFSH/uHMG on ovarian stimulation. Conclusion: The administration of rFSH significantly increased the number of oocytes retrieved, whereas there were no significant differences between the efficacies of rFSH and uFSH/uHMG for pregnancy outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins is crucial for obtaining mature oocytes for in vitro fertilization (IVF). Determining the optimal gonadotropin dosage is essential for maximizing its effectiveness. Our study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model to predict oocyte counts in IVF patients and retrospectively analyze whether higher gonadotropin doses improve ovarian stimulation outcomes. Methods: We analyzed the data from 9598 ovarian stimulations. An ML model was employed to predict the number of mature metaphase II (MII) oocytes based on clinical parameters. These predictions were compared with the actual counts of retrieved MII oocytes at different gonadotropin dosages. Results: The ML model provided precise predictions of MII counts, with the AMH and AFC being the most important, and the previous stimulation outcome and age, the less important features for the prediction. Our findings revealed that increasing gonadotropin dosage did not result in a higher number of retrieved MII oocytes. Specifically, for patients predicted to produce 4–8 MII oocytes, a decline in oocyte count was observed as gonadotropin dosage increased. Patients with low (1–3) and high (9–12) MII predictions achieved the best results when administered a daily dose of 225 IU; lower and higher doses proved to be less effective. Conclusions: Our study suggests that high gonadotropin doses do not enhance MII oocyte retrieval. Our ML model can offer clinicians a novel tool for the precise prediction of MII to guide gonadotropin dosing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in patients with a poor ovarian response who used methyltestosterone, versus those using a placebo, in an infertility clinic setting. Methods: This clinical trial included 120 women who had undergone IVF with intracytoplasmic sperm injection due to poor ovarian reserve and infertility. The study took place at the Yas Infertility Center in Tehran, Iran, between January 1, 2018 and January 1, 2019. In the intervention group, 25 mg of methyltestosterone was administered daily for 2 months prior to the initiation of assisted reproductive treatment. The control group was given placebo tablets for the same duration before starting their cycle. Each group was randomly assigned 60 patients. All analyses were performed using SPSS ver. 23 (IBM Corp.). Results: The endometrial thickness in the intervention group was 7.57±1.22 mm, whereas in the control group, it was 7.11±1.02 (p=0.028). The gonadotropin number was significantly higher in the control group (64.7±13.48 vs. 57.9±9.25, p=0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the antral follicular count. The chemical and clinical pregnancy rates in the intervention group were 18.33% and 15% respectively, compared to 8.33% and 6.67% in the control group. The rate of definitive pregnancy was marginally higher in the intervention group (13.3% vs. 3.3%, p=0.05). Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that pretreatment with methyltestosterone significantly increases endometrium thickness and is associated with an increase in the definitive pregnancy rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare in-vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients treated with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) alone or FSH and luteinizing hormone (LH), under freeze-all gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocols. Material and Methods: This retrospective study at a university center included PCOS patients, who underwent freeze-all GnRH antagonist IVF cycles between January 2013 and December 2019. They were divided into FSH-only and FSH + LH groups, focusing on pregnancy and live birth rates. Results: The study included 82 patients: 43 received FSH + LH and 39 FSH only. Baseline characteristics were similar, except for higher thyroid stimulating hormone levels in the FSH-only group. The FSH + LH group required a lower mean ± standard deviation total dose of FSH (1271.5±376.7 vs. 1407.2±645.3 IU, p=0.02), had a shorter mean cycle length (7.3±3.4 vs. 8.3±1.6 days, p=0.004), and had a higher mean number of follicles stimulated (36.9±15.9 vs. 35.9±9.7, p=0.008) compared to the FSH-only group. No significant differences in pregnancy and live birth rates were noted at first transfer, but the cumulative live birth rate was significantly higher in the FSH-only group [30 of 39 (76.9%) vs. 24 of 43 (55.8%), p=0.044]. Conclusion: LH supplementation in PCOS patients undergoing GnRH antagonist IVF protocols may impair cumulative live birth rates, despite lowering FSH requirement and reducing IVF cycle length. These results highlight the complex role of LH in IVF outcomes for PCOS patients, suggesting a need for further large studies to fully understand the impact of LH in such treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In some cases, infertile patients have poor ovarian response, so it is necessary to obtain the right number of oocytes with proper stimulation. The number of oocytes obtained is directly related to fertility success. This study was conducted with aim to compare two methods of double stimulation and two regular sequential stimulations and their relationship with pregnancy outcomes. Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted in Shariati Hospital of Tehran in 2022-2023. A total of 140 women with poor ovarian response based on Bologna criteria who underwent oocyte puncture were selected for in vitro fertilization. Among these, 70 women with double stimulation and 70 women with two consecutive normal stimulations after embryo transfer were compared in terms of clinical pregnancy rate and cumulative live birth rate. T-test or Mann-Whitney test was used to examine quantitative variables and chi-square test was used to examine qualitative variables. Data analysis was done using SPSS statistical software (version 24). P<0.05 was considered significant. Results: The results showed that although the percentage of clinical pregnancy (p=0.28) and live birth (p=0.5) was higher in the group under double stimulation, however, no significant relationship was observed between them. It was also found that the number of MII oocytes and follicles greater than 14 mm and the number of frozen embryos was higher in the group of double stimulation compared to the other group, which was statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: The double stimulation compared to regular sequential stimulation had no superiority in pregnancy outcomes, including chemical and clinical pregnancy. However, it can increase the number of MII eggs, follicles larger than 14 mm and the number of frozen embryos. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• gEFS is extremely rare phenomenon among IVF patients. • The pathogenesis of gEFS remain largely elusive. • Pathogenic variants in genes related to HA, folliculogenesis and ovarian function may be considered as a genetic etiology of gEFS. Empty follicle syndrome (EFS) is a condition in which no oocytes are retrieved in an IVF cycle despite apparently normal follicular development and meticulous follicular aspiration following ovulation induction. The EFS is called genuine (gEFS) when the trigger administration is correct. The existence of gEFS is a subject of controversy, and it is quite rare with an undetermined etiology. Genetic defects in specific genes have been demonstrated to be responsible for this condition in some patients. Our objective was to identify novel genetic variants associated with gEFS. We conducted a prospective observational study including 1,689 egg donors from July 2017 to February 2023. WES were performed in patients suffering gEFS. Only 7 patients (0.41 %) exhibited gEFS after two ovarian stimulation cycles and we subsequently performed whole exome sequencing (WES) on these patients. Following stringent filtering, we identified 6 variants in 5 affected patients as pathogenic in new candidate genes which have not been previously associated with gEFS before, but which are involved in important biological processes related to folliculogenesis. These genetic variants included c.603_618del in HMMR , c.1025_1028del in LMNB1 , c.1091-1G > A in TDG , c.607C > T in HABP2 , c.100 + 2 T > C in HAPLN1 and c.3592_3593del in JAG2. As a conclusion, we identified new candidate genes related to gEFS that expand the mutational spectrum of genes related to gEFS.This study show that WES might be an efficient tool to identify the genetic etiology of gEFS and provide further understanding of the pathogenic mechanism of gEFS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Uterine fluid (UF) extracellular vesicle (EV) miRNA may affect implantation and could be the potential biomarker of endometrial receptivity (ER). Ovarian stimulation (OS) could damage the ER but its mechanism is still unclear. Here, we evaluate the affections of OS on UF EV miRNA expression and implantation. Female rats were divided into three groups: natural cycle or injection with GnRH-a following HP-HMG or u-FSH. UF was collected on the 5th day of gestation. Affinity membrane columns were utilized to isolate EVs from UF, obtained during implantation flushing. The EV miRNAs were sequenced, and five of them were validated by qRT-PCR. HTR-8/Svneo cells were transfected with miR-223-3p mimic and inhibitor, followed by conducting colony formation, invasion, migration, and adhesion assays to assess the cellular functions. In OS groups, the implantation rate decreased (p < 0.05), and the pinopode was damaged in the OS groups. The EVs were isolated from UF, and the differential expression key miRNAs were involved in several regulation pathways, such as cancer, endocrine, and cell cycles, which were correlated with ER and implantation. Among the miRNAs, miR-223-5p greatly differed and was most consistent with the sequencing results, followed by miR-223-3p and miR-98-5P. miR-223-3p promoted HTR-8/SVneo cells grow and ability of invasion, migration, and adhesion. OS altered UF EVs miRNAs affecting implantation in rats, and miR-223-3p might be the key molecule. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cumulus granulosa cells (CGCs) play a crucial role in follicular development, but so far, no research has explored the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on ovarian function from the perspective of CGCs. In the present study, we compared the cycle outcomes between infected and uninfected female patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation, performed bulk RNA-sequencing of collected CGCs, and used bioinformatic methods to explore transcriptomic changes. The results showed that women with SARS-CoV-2 infection during stimulation had significantly lower number of oocytes retrieved and follicle-oocyte index, while subsequent fertilization and embryo development were similar. CGCs were not directly infected by SARS-CoV-2, but exhibited dramatic differences in gene expression (156 up-regulated and 65 down-regulated). Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analyses demonstrated a high enrichment in antiviral, immune and inflammatory responses with necroptosis. In addition, the pathways related to telomere organization and double strand break repair were significantly affected by infection in gene set enrichment analysis. Further weighted gene co-expression network analysis identified a key module associated with ovarian response traits, which was mainly enriched as a decrease of leukocyte chemotaxis and migration in CGCs. For the first time, our study describes how SARS-CoV-2 infection indirectly affects CGCs at the transcriptional level, which may impair oocyte-CGC crosstalk and consequently lead to poor ovarian response during fertility treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PurposeTo evaluate self-reported survey data provided by US oocyte donors on their experiences with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and possible correlations between OHSS severity and number of oocytes retrieved, trigger type, and prior OHSS history.MethodsAn 85-question retrospective survey was administered online. Survey questions included demographic information, reasons for donating, immediate per-cycle experiences and outcomes, perceptions of informed consent, and perceived impact of donation on long-term health. Quantitative Data for this study was collected between February 2019 and September 2020 via QualtricsXM (January 2019), an online survey platform. Follow-up interviews were also conducted. Participants were recruited via fertility clinics, egg donation agencies, and online forum. The research was approved by the University of California, San Francisco Institutional Review Board (#14-14765).ResultsOf 420 initiated US oocyte donor online surveys, 289 (68%) respondents provided detailed information on per cycle experiences with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, number of oocytes retrieved, and trigger type over a total of 801 cycles. On cycles where donors reported receiving GnRH agonist triggers (n = 337), they reported milder OHSS compared to cycles with hCG or dual triggers. Among donors undergoing multiple retrieval cycles, the severity of OHSS in second cycles was strongly associated with OHSS severity in first cycles.ConclusionSelf-reported OHSS in oocyte donors is lower in GnRH antagonist stimulation protocols combined with GnRHa trigger and in cycles where donors reported fewer than 30 oocytes retrieved. Donors who reported severe OHSS on a prior cycle were significantly more likely to experience severe OHSS on a subsequent cycle.

Purpose: Fertility issues are of great concern for young women undergoing treatment for breast cancer (BC). Fertility preservation (FP) protocols using controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with letrozole have been widely used with overall good results. However, letrozole cannot be used in every country in this context. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of tamoxifen for COS in women with early BC undergoing FP. Methods: This multicentric prospective study included patients aged 18–40, diagnosed with stage I, II and III invasive BC, undergoing tamoxifen-COS before adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The primary endpoint was the efficacy of tamoxifen-COS protocol evaluated by the number of oocytes collected and vitrified. Secondary endpoints included the time interval before chemotherapy, breast cancer (BC) recurrence rates, and reproductive outcomes. Results: Ninety-five patients were included between 2014 and 2017, aged 31.5 ± 4 years on average. 37.9 % received NAC and 62.1 % received adjuvant chemotherapy. FP procedure was successful in 89.5 % of the cycles. The mean number of collected and vitrified oocytes was 12.8 ± 7.9 and 9.8 ± 6.2, respectively. The mean duration of COS was 10.4 ± 1.9 days. Median time before chemotherapy initiation was 3.6 weeks (IQR 3.1; 4.1) for women receiving NAC. Five-year relapse-free and overall survival rates were in-line with those expected in this population. Twenty-one women had spontaneous full-term pregnancies, while 5 underwent IVF cycles with frozen-thawed oocytes, without pregnancy. Conclusion: Tamoxifen-COS protocols appear to be feasible before adjuvant or NAC treatment in young BC patients and efficient in terms of oocyte yield.

IntroductionA Delphi consensus was performed to evaluate expert opinions on the management of key aspects of ovarian stimulation.MethodsA Scientific Committee developed eleven statements for patient profiles corresponding to predicted ovarian responses (low, normal, and high) based on antral follicle count (AFC) and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH). The statements were distributed (online survey) to French and Belgian fertility specialists. Consensus was reached when ≥66.7% of participants agreed or disagreed.ResultsAmong 52 respondents, a consensus agreement was reached for each patient profile for personalizing the initial dose of gonadotropin, taking age, weight, body mass index, nature of the cycle, and the decision to perform a fresh transfer or a freeze-all strategy into consideration. The respondents preferred a fresh transfer for low and normal responders and a freeze-all strategy in case of high risk of hyperstimulation, newly diagnosed uterine or tubal pathology and premature progesterone elevation. A consensus was reached for 10–15 oocytes as optimal oocyte target from the first round of voting. The panel agreed to increase the gonadotropin dose in case of insufficient response and preferred a GnRH antagonist protocol for a subsequent cycle in case of excessive response. Finally, a consensual answer was obtained for using LH/hCG activity in case of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, advanced age, inadequate response during first stimulation and suspected FSH receptor polymorphism.DiscussionThe AMPLITUDE consensus supports the importance of optimizing the ovarian stimulation protocol for patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment. Additional studies could complete these findings and guide fertility specialists in their daily practice to improve ovarian stimulation outcomes.

IntroductionThis large multicenter study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes using three follitropin alfa preparations within a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol, while identifying contributing factors to cycle success.MethodsA retrospective, anonymized cohort analysis was conducted on donor-recipient cycles from 12 clinics during 2019 to 2021. 7389 oocyte donors underwent ovarian stimulation (OS) with three follitropin alfa preparations (Ovaleap® [n=3231], Bemfola® [n=3542], Gonal-F® [n=616]) were included. Stimulation began on cycle days 2 or 3 with daily administration of 150-225 IU follitropin alfa. 10 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) was administered daily until GnRH agonist trigger using a single dose of 0.2mg GnRH agonist for final follicular maturation. Statistical analysis included ANOVA, Chi-squared, and logistic regression.ResultsWhilst there were some differences in patient and stimulation characteristics, including donor age and number of retrieved oocytes, clinical variables did not significantly differ among the three study groups. Linear regression revealed donor age [0.986 (0.974-0.999)] and number of mature oocytes [1.027 (1.007-1.047)] significantly impacted ongoing pregnancy rates, while the type of follitropin alfa [1.048 (0.956-1.149)] used did not. No significant differences were observed in the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) among oocytes obtained from stimulation with Bemfola (64.9%), Gonal-F (64.1%) and Ovaleap (66.1%), p= 0.385.DiscussionThis study demonstrated comparable clinical outcomes and CLBR between biosimilars and the reference product of follitropin alfa within PPOS protocols, hence they are interchangeable in a real-world patient setting.

Reproductive medicine is actively developing, and new methods, drugs, and protocols are being developed and introduced for the treatment of infertility. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are the most effective methods. In ART protocols, ovarian stimulation (OS) is based on gonadotropin use. The choice of the starting dose of gonadotropin is a critical factor in the successful OS and the effectiveness of ART programs. The article describes the development history of gonadotropins and provides current data on their use in ART programs. The use of biosimilars of follitropin alfa in OS is discussed, and the effectiveness of its Russian biosimilar is also addressed. TRANSLATE with x English Arabic Hebrew Polish Bulgarian Hindi Portuguese Catalan Hmong Daw Romanian Chinese Simplified Hungarian Russian Chinese Traditional Indonesian Slovak Czech Italian Slovenian Danish Japanese Spanish Dutch Klingon Swedish English Korean Thai Estonian Latvian Turkish Finnish Lithuanian Ukrainian French Malay Urdu German Maltese Vietnamese Greek Norwegian Welsh Haitian Creole Persian TRANSLATE with COPY THE URL BELOW Back EMBED THE SNIPPET BELOW IN YOUR SITE Enable collaborative features and customize widget: Bing Webmaster Portal Back

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol versus the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol in ovarian stimulation. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included 804 patients who were treated between January 1st, 2022, and July 1st, 2023. Outcomes of ovarian stimulation were compared between the PPOS (n = 206) and GnRH-ant (n = 598). The primary outcome was the number of good cleavage embryos. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. In both unadjusted and adjusted analysis, the mean number of good cleavage embryos in PPOS (6.33) was non-inferior to GnRH-ant (6.44; unadjusted ratio of two means 1.02, 95%CI 0.92, 1.13). The trigger-day estradiol level in patients with PPOS was higher than in patients with GnRH-ant (4,420 vs 3,830 pg/ml, respectively) despite similar total follicle stimulating hormone dose and fewer days of ovarian stimulation. The number of oocytes, MII oocytes, cleavage and blastocyst embryos were comparable between the two protocols. After the first transfer of embryos, the clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate were higher in the PPOS group, while the pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy were not significantly different. None of the PPOS patients had an unexpected LH surge, and serum LH levels decreased slightly during ovarian stimulation. Conclusions: The PPOS protocol with dydrogesterone provided similar embryo outcomes to the GnRH-ant protocol, with notable distinctions in clinical pregnancy and implantation rate. The serum LH concentration during ovarian stimulation using PPOS was well-controlled.

Ovarian stimulation protocols are widely used to collect oocytes in assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). Although the influence of ovarian stimulation on embryo quality has been described, this issue remains controversial. Here, we analyzed the influence of ovarian stimulation on developmental speed and chromosome segregation using live cell imaging. Female mice at the proestrus stage were separated by the appearance of the vagina as the non-stimulation (–) group, and other mice were administered pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) as the stimulation (+) groups. The cumulus-oocyte complexes from both groups were inseminated with sperm suspensions from the same male mice. Fertilization rates and developmental capacities were examined, and the developmental speed and frequency of chromosome segregation errors were measured by live-cell imaging using a Histone H2B-mCherry probe. The number of fertilized oocytes obtained was 1.4-fold more frequent in the stimulation (+) group. The developmental rate and chromosome stability did not differ between the groups. Image analysis showed that the mean speed of development in the stimulation (+) group was slightly higher than that in the non-stimulation (–) group. This increase in speed seemed to arise from the slight shortening of the 2- and 4-cell stages and third division lengths and consequent synchronization of cleavage timing in each embryo, not from the emergence of an extremely rapidly developing subpopulation of embryos. In conclusion, ovarian stimulation does not necessarily affect embryo quality but rather increases the chances of obtaining high-quality oocytes in mice.

Background: Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) has been proposed as an alternative to conventional gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol for ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization (IVF). The aim of PPOS is to provide an effective, patient-friendly treatment. However, studies comparing outcomes after the use of PPOS and GnRH antagonist protocol in IVF have shown mixed results. This study compared ongoing pregnancy rates after the use of PPOS versus GnRH antagonist protocol for ovarian stimulation in IVF. Methods: This prospective pilot study was conducted at a single IVF center. Women aged 18–35 years old with an anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level greater than or equal to 1.2[Formula: see text]ng/mL or an antral follicle count (AFC) greater than or equal to 5 who were undergoing their first IVF cycle were allocated to undergoing ovarian stimulation using PPOS (dydrogesterone 20[Formula: see text]mg/day started on the day of gonadotropin) or a GnRH antagonist protocol (fixed regimen from stimulation day 5). The primary outcome was the ongoing pregnancy rate (at 12 weeks’ gestation). Results: The study included 30 women (15 in each treatment group). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The ongoing pregnancy rate was 7/15 (46.7%) in the PPOS group and 8/15 (53.3%) in the GnRH antagonist group ([Formula: see text]); the number of oocytes retrieved and fertilization rates were also comparable between groups. One case of mild ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) occurred in the GnRH antagonist group. Conclusions: This pilot study showed similar ongoing pregnancy rates after the use of a PPOS protocol and a conventional GnRH antagonist protocol for ovarian stimulation in IVF. Additional studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings.

Abstract Background Follitropin delta is a novel recombinant follicle stimulating hormone preparation uniquely expressed in a human fetal retinal cell line by recombinant DNA technology. To date, no systematic review was available about the safety and the efficacy of the follitropin delta. The objective of this study was systematically reviewing the available literature and to provide updated evidence regarding the efficacy-safety profile of follitropin delta when compared to other gonadotropin formulations for ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. Methods An extensive search was performed to identify phase 1, phase 2 and phase 3 RCTs in humans focused on follitropin delta use for ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI cycles. The risk of bias and the overall quality of the evidence was analyzed. All data were extracted and analyzed using the intention-to-treat principle and expressed per woman randomized. Results A total of 7 RCTs (1 phase 1 RCT, 2 phase 2 RCTs and 4 phase 3 RCTs) were included in the qualitative analysis, whereas data of three phase 3 RCTs were meta-analyzed. All trials compared personalized recombinant follitropin delta treatment versus conventional recombinant follitropin alfa/beta administration in potentially normo-responder patients who receive ovarian stimulation in GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles. No difference between two regimens was detected for clinical pregnancy rate [odds ratio (OR) 1.06; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.90, 1.24; P = 0.49; I2 = 26%], ongoing pregnancy rate (OR 1.15; 95%CI: 0.90, 1.46; P = 0.27; I2 = 40%), and live birth rate (OR 1.18; 95%CI: 0.89, 1.55; P = 0.25; I2 = 55%). No data were available regarding cumulative success rates. The rate of adoption of strategies to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) development (OR 0.45; 95%CI: 0.30, 0.66; P