Search

Your search keyword '"ORY, H"' showing total 120 results
Start Over Author "ORY, H"
120 results on '"ORY, H"'

2. Menopausal hormone use and ovarian cancer risk : individual participant meta-analysis of 52 epidemiological studies

Author

Gapstur, S. M., Patel, A. V., Banks, E., Dal Maso, L., Talamini, R., Chetrit, A., Hirsh-Yechezkel, G., Lubin, F., Sadetzki, S., Beral, V., Bull, D., Cairns, B., Crossley, B., Gaitskell, K., Goodill, A., Green, J., Hermon, C., Key, T., Moser, K., Reeves, G., Sitas, F., Collins, R., Peto, R., Gonzalez, C. A., Lee, N., Marchbanks, P., Ory, H. W., Peterson, H. B., Wingo, P. A., Martin, N., Silpisornkosol, S., Theetranont, C., Boosiri, B., Chutivongse, S., Jimakorn, P., Virutamasen, P., Wongsrichanalai, C., Goodman, M. T., Lidegaard, O., Kjaer, S. K., Morch, L. S., Tjonneland, A., Byers, T., Rohan, T., Mosgaard, B., Vessey, M., Yeates, D., Onland-Moret, N. C., Peeters, P. H. M., and Collaborative Grp Epidemiological

Subjects
WOMEN, HEALTH, THERAPY
Abstract

Background Half the epidemiological studies with information about menopausal hormone therapy and ovarian cancer risk remain unpublished, and some retrospective studies could have been biased by selective participation or recall. We aimed to assess with minimal bias the effects of hormone therapy on ovarian cancer risk. Methods Individual participant datasets from 52 epidemiological studies were analysed centrally. The principal analyses involved the prospective studies (with last hormone therapy use extrapolated forwards for up to 4 years). Sensitivity analyses included the retrospective studies. Adjusted Poisson regressions yielded relative risks (RRs) versus never-use. Findings During prospective follow-up, 12 110 postmenopausal women, 55% (6601) of whom had used hormone therapy, developed ovarian cancer. Among women last recorded as current users, risk was increased even with Interpretation The increased risk may well be largely or wholly causal; if it is, women who use hormone therapy for 5 years from around age 50 years have about one extra ovarian cancer per 1000 users and, if its prognosis is typical, about one extra ovarian cancer death per 1700 users.

Published
2015

3. Menopausal hormone use and ovarian cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis of 52 epidemiological studies

Author

Gapstur, S. M. Patel, A. V. Banks, E. Dal Maso, L. and Talamini, R. Chetrit, A. Hirsh-Yechezkel, G. Lubin, F. and Sadetzki, S. Beral, V. Bull, D. Cairns, B. Crossley, B. and Gaitskell, K. Goodill, A. Green, J. Hermon, C. Key, T. Moser, K. Reeves, G. Sitas, F. Collins, R. Peto, R. Gonzalez, C. A. Lee, N. Marchbanks, P. Ory, H. W. and Peterson, H. B. Wingo, P. A. Martin, N. Silpisornkosol, S. and Theetranont, C. Boosiri, B. Chutivongse, S. Jimakorn, P. and Virutamasen, P. Wongsrichanalai, C. Goodman, M. T. and Lidegaard, O. Kjaer, S. K. Morch, L. S. Tjonneland, A. and Byers, T. Rohan, T. Mosgaard, B. Vessey, M. Yeates, D. and Freudenheim, J. L. Titus, L. J. Chang-Claude, J. Kaaks, R. Anderson, K. E. Lazovich, D. Robien, K. Hampton, J. and Newcomb, P. A. Rossing, M. A. Thomas, D. B. Weiss, N. S. and Lokkegaard, E. Riboli, E. Clavel-Chapelon, F. Cramer, D. and Hankinson, S. E. Tamimi, R. M. Tworoger, S. S. and Franceschi, S. La Vecchia, C. Negri, E. Adami, H. O. and Magnusson, C. Riman, T. Weiderpass, E. Wolk, A. and Schouten, L. J. van den Brandt, P. A. Chantarakul, N. and Koetsawang, S. Rachawat, D. Palli, D. Black, A. Brinton, L. A. Freedman, D. M. Hartge, P. Hsing, A. W. Jnr, J. V. Lacey Lissowska, J. Hoover, R. N. Schairer, C. Babb, C. and Urban, M. Graff-Iversen, S. Selmer, R. Bain, C. J. and Green, A. C. Purdie, D. M. Siskind, V. Webb, P. M. and Moysich, K. McCann, S. E. Hannaford, P. Kay, C. Binns, C. W. Lee, A. H. Zhang, M. Ness, R. B. Nasca, P. and Coogan, P. F. Palmer, J. R. Rosenberg, L. Whittemore, A. and Katsouyanni, K. Trichopoulou, A. Trichopoulos, D. Tzonou, A. and Dabancens, A. Martinez, L. Molina, R. Salas, O. and Lurie, G. Carney, M. E. Wilkens, L. R. Hartman, L. and Manjer, J. Olsson, H. Kumle, M. Grisso, J. A. Morgan, M. and Wheeler, J. E. Edwards, R. P. Kelley, J. L. Modugno, F. and Onland-Moret, N. C. Peeters, P. H. M. Casagrande, J. and Pike, M. C. Wu, A. H. Canfell, K. Miller, A. B. Gram, I. T. Lund, E. McGowan, L. Shu, X. O. Zheng, W. Farley, T. M. M. Holck, S. Meirik, O. Risch, H. A. Collaborative Grp Epidemiological

Abstract

Background Half the epidemiological studies with information about menopausal hormone therapy and ovarian cancer risk remain unpublished, and some retrospective studies could have been biased by selective participation or recall. We aimed to assess with minimal bias the effects of hormone therapy on ovarian cancer risk. Methods Individual participant datasets from 52 epidemiological studies were analysed centrally. The principal analyses involved the prospective studies (with last hormone therapy use extrapolated forwards for up to 4 years). Sensitivity analyses included the retrospective studies. Adjusted Poisson regressions yielded relative risks (RRs) versus never-use. Findings During prospective follow-up, 12 110 postmenopausal women, 55% (6601) of whom had used hormone therapy, developed ovarian cancer. Among women last recorded as current users, risk was increased even with

Published
2015

4. Menopausal hormone use and ovarian cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis of 52 epidemiological studies

Author

Epi Kanker Team 1, JC onderzoeksprogramma Kanker, Cancer, Cardiovasculaire Epi Team 3, Circulatory Health, JC onderzoeksprogramma Cardiovasculaire Epidemiologie, Gapstur, S. M., Patel, A. V., Banks, E., Dal Maso, L., Talamini, R., Chetrit, A., Hirsh-Yechezkel, G., Lubin, F., Sadetzki, S., Beral, V., Bull, D., Cairns, B., Crossley, B., Gaitskell, K., Goodill, A., Green, J., Hermon, C., Key, T., Moser, K., Reeves, G., Sitas, F., Collins, R., Peto, R., Gonzalez, C. A., Lee, N., Marchbanks, P., Ory, H. W., Peterson, H. B., Wingo, P. A., Martin, N., Silpisornkosol, S., Theetranont, C., Boosiri, B., Chutivongse, S., Jimakorn, P., Virutamasen, P., Wongsrichanalai, C., Goodman, M. T., Lidegaard, O., Kjaer, S. K., Morch, L. S., Tjonneland, A., Byers, T., Rohan, T., Mosgaard, B., Vessey, M., Yeates, D., Onland-Moret, N. C., Peeters, P. H. M., Collaborative Grp Epidemiological, Epi Kanker Team 1, JC onderzoeksprogramma Kanker, Cancer, Cardiovasculaire Epi Team 3, Circulatory Health, JC onderzoeksprogramma Cardiovasculaire Epidemiologie, Gapstur, S. M., Patel, A. V., Banks, E., Dal Maso, L., Talamini, R., Chetrit, A., Hirsh-Yechezkel, G., Lubin, F., Sadetzki, S., Beral, V., Bull, D., Cairns, B., Crossley, B., Gaitskell, K., Goodill, A., Green, J., Hermon, C., Key, T., Moser, K., Reeves, G., Sitas, F., Collins, R., Peto, R., Gonzalez, C. A., Lee, N., Marchbanks, P., Ory, H. W., Peterson, H. B., Wingo, P. A., Martin, N., Silpisornkosol, S., Theetranont, C., Boosiri, B., Chutivongse, S., Jimakorn, P., Virutamasen, P., Wongsrichanalai, C., Goodman, M. T., Lidegaard, O., Kjaer, S. K., Morch, L. S., Tjonneland, A., Byers, T., Rohan, T., Mosgaard, B., Vessey, M., Yeates, D., Onland-Moret, N. C., Peeters, P. H. M., and Collaborative Grp Epidemiological

Published
2015

5. Menarche, menopause, and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis, including 118 964 women with breast cancer from 117 epidemiological studies

Author

Beral, V. Bull, D. Pirie, K. Reeves, G. Peto, R. and Skegg, D. LaVecchia, C. Magnusson, C. Pike, M. C. and Thomas, D. Hamajima, N. Hirose, K. Tajima, K. Rohan, T. and Friedenreich, C. M. Calle, E. E. Gapstur, S. M. Patel, A. V. Coates, R. J. Liff, J. M. Talamini, R. and Chantarakul, N. Koetsawang, S. Rachawat, D. Marcou, Y. and Kakouri, E. Duffy, S. W. Morabia, A. Schuman, L. and Stewart, W. Szklo, M. Coogan, P. F. Palmer, J. R. and Rosenberg, L. Band, P. Coldman, A. J. Gallagher, R. P. and Hislop, T. G. Yang, P. Cummings, S. R. Canfell, K. and Sitas, F. Chao, P. Lissowska, J. Horn-Ross, P. L. John, E. M. Kolonel, L. M. Nomura, A. M. Y. Ghiasvand, R. Hu, J. Johnson, K. C. Mao, Y. Callaghan, K. Crossley, B. and Goodill, A. Green, J. Hermon, C. Key, T. Lindgard, I. and Liu, B. Collins, R. Doll, R. Bishop, T. Fentiman, I. S. De Sanjose, S. Gonzaler, C. A. Lee, N. Marchbanks, P. and Ory, H. W. Peterson, H. B. Wingo, P. Ebeling, K. and Kunde, D. Nishan, P. Hopper, J. L. Eliassen, H. and Gajalakshmi, V. Martin, N. Pardthaisong, T. Silpisornkosol, S. Theetranont, C. Boosiri, B. Chutivongse, S. Jimakorn, P. Virutamasen, P. Wongsrichanalai, C. Neugut, A. and Santella, R. Baines, C. J. Kreiger, N. Miller, A. B. and Wall, C. Tjonneland, A. Jorgensen, T. Stahlberg, C. and Pedersen, A. Tonnes Flesch-Janys, D. Hakansson, N. Cauley, J. Heuch, I. Adami, H. O. Persson, I. Weiderpass, E. and Chang-Claude, J. Kaaks, R. McCredie, M. Paul, C. Spears, G. F. S. Iwasaki, M. Tsugane, S. Anderson, G. Daling, J. R. Hampton, J. Hutchinson, W. B. Li, C. I. Malone, K. and Mandelson, M. Newcomb, P. Noonan, E. A. Ray, R. M. and Stanford, J. L. Tang, M. T. C. Weiss, N. S. White, E. and Izquierdo, A. Viladiu, P. Fourkala, E. O. Jacobs, I. and Menon, U. Ryan, A. Cuevas, H. R. Ontiveros, P. Palet, A. and Salazar, S. B. Aristizabal, N. Cuadros, A. and Tryggvadottir, L. Tulinius, H. Riboli, E. Andrieu, N. and Bachelot, A. Le, M. G. Bremond, A. Gairard, B. Lansac, J. Piana, L. Renaud, R. Clavel-Chapelon, F. Fournier, A. and Touillaud, M. Mesrine, S. Chabbert-Buffet, N. and Boutron-Ruault, M. C. Wolk, A. Torres-Mejia, G. Franceschi, S. Romieu, I. Boyle, P. Lubin, F. Modan, B. Ron, E. and Wax, Y. Friedman, G. D. Hiatt, R. A. Levi, F. and Kosmelj, K. Primic-Zakelj, M. Ravnihar, B. Stare, J. and Ekbom, A. Erlandsson, G. Beeson, W. L. Fraser, G. Peto, J. Hanson, R. L. Leske, M. C. Mahoney, M. C. Nasca, P. C. Varma, A. O. Weinstein, A. L. Hartman, M. L. Olsson, H. Goldbohm, R. A. van den Brandt, P. A. Palli, D. and Teitelbaum, S. Apelo, R. A. Baens, J. de la Cruz, J. R. and Javier, B. Lacaya, L. B. Ngelangel, C. A. La Vecchia, C. and Negri, E. Marubini, E. Ferraroni, M. Gerber, M. and Richardson, S. Segala, C. Gatei, D. Kenya, P. Kungu, A. and Mati, J. G. Brinton, L. A. Freedman, M. Hoover, R. and Schairer, C. Ziegler, R. Banks, E. Spirtas, R. Lee, H. P. Rookus, M. A. van Leeuwen, F. E. Schoenberg, J. A. and Graff-Iversen, S. Selmer, R. Jones, L. McPherson, K. and Neil, A. Vessey, M. Yeates, D. Mabuchi, K. Preston, D. and Hannaford, P. Kay, C. McCann, S. E. Rosero-Bixby, L. and Gao, Y. T. Jin, F. Yuan, J-M Wei, H. Y. Yun, T. and Zhiheng, C. Berry, G. Booth, J. Cooper Jelihovsky, T. and MacLennan, R. Shearman, R. Hadjisavvas, A. Kyriacou, K. and Loisidou, M. Zhou, X. Wang, Q-S Kawai, M. Minami, Y. and Tsuji, I. Lund, E. Kumle, M. Stalsberg, H. Shu, X. O. and Zheng, W. Monninkhof, E. M. Onland-Moret, N. C. Peeters, P. H. M. Katsouyanni, K. Trichopoulou, A. Trichopoulos, D. and Tzonou, A. Baltzell, K. A. Dabancens, A. Martinez, L. and Molina, R. Salas, O. Alexander, F. E. Anderson, K. and Folsom, A. R. Gammon, M. D. Hulka, B. S. Millikan, R. and Chilvers, C. E. D. Lumachi, F. Bain, C. Schofield, F. and Siskind, V. Rebbeck, T. R. Bernstein, L. R. Enger, S. and Haile, R. W. Paganini-Hill, A. Ross, R. K. Ursin, G. Wu, A. H. Yu, M. C. Ewertz, Denmark M. Clarke, E. A. and Bergkvist, L. Gass, M. O'Sullivan, M. J. Kalache, A. and Farley, T. M. M. Holck, S. Meirik, O. Fukao, A. and Collaborative Grp Hormonal Factors Collaborative Grp Hormonal Factors S Hankinson Nurses Hlth Study I II

Subjects
skin and connective tissue diseases
Abstract

Background Menarche and menopause mark the onset and cessation, respectively, of ovarian activity associated with reproduction, and affect breast cancer risk. Our aim was to assess the strengths of their effects and determine whether they depend on characteristics of the tumours or the affected women. Methods Individual data from 117 epidemiological studies, including 118 964 women with invasive breast cancer and 306 091 without the disease, none of whom had used menopausal hormone therapy, were included in the analyses. We calculated adjusted relative risks (RRs) associated with menarche and menopause for breast cancer overall, and by tumour histology and by oestrogen receptor expression. Findings Breast cancer risk increased by a factor of 1.050 (95% CI 1.044-1.057; p < 0.0001) for every year younger at menarche, and independently by a smaller amount (1.029, 1.025-1.032; p < 0.0001), for every year older at menopause. Premenopausal women had a greater risk of breast cancer than postmenopausal women of an identical age (RR at age 45-54 years 1.43, 1.33-1.52, p < 0.001). All three of these associations were attenuated by increasing adiposity among postmenopausal women, but did not vary materially by women’s year of birth, ethnic origin, childbearing history, smoking, alcohol consumption, or hormonal contraceptive use. All three associations were stronger for lobular than for ductal tumours (p < 0.006 for each comparison). The effect of menopause in women of an identical age and trends by age at menopause were stronger for oestrogen receptor-positive disease than for oestrogen receptor-negative disease (p < 0.01 for both comparisons). Interpretation The effects of menarche and menopause on breast cancer risk might not be acting merely by lengthening women’s total number of reproductive years. Endogenous ovarian hormones are more relevant for oestrogen receptor-positive disease than for oestrogen receptor-negative disease and for lobular than for ductal tumours. Funding Cancer Research UK.

Published
2012

6. Ovarian cancer and smoking: individual participant meta-analysis including 28 114 women with ovarian cancer from 51 epidemiological studies

Author

Beral, V. Gaitskell, K. Hermon, C. Moser, K. Reeves, G. and Peto, R. Brinton, L. Marchbanks, P. Negri, E. Ness, R. Peeters, P. H. M. Vessey, M. Calle, E. E. Gapstur, S. M. Patel, A. V. Dal Maso, L. Talamini, R. Chetrit, A. and Hirsh-Yechezkel, G. Lubin, F. Sadetzki, S. Banks, E. and Bull, D. Callaghan, K. Crossley, B. Goodill, A. Green, J. Key, T. Sitas, F. Collins, R. Doll, R. Gonzalez, A. Lee, N. Ory, H. W. Peterson, H. B. Wingo, P. A. and Martin, N. Pardthaisong, T. Silpisornkosol, S. Theetranont, C. Boosiri, B. Chutivongse, S. Jimakorn, P. Virutamasen, P. Wongsrichanalai, C. Tjonneland, A. Titus-Ernstoff, L. and Byers, T. Rohan, T. Mosgaard, B. J. Yeates, D. and Freudenheim, J. L. Chang-Claude, J. Kaaks, R. Anderson, K. E. Folsom, A. Robien, K. Hampton, J. Newcomb, P. A. and Rossing, M. A. Thomas, D. B. Weiss, N. S. Riboli, E. and Clavel-Chapelon, F. Cramer, D. Hankinson, S. E. Tworoger, S. S. Franceschi, S. La Vecchia, C. Adami, H. O. Magnusson, C. Riman, T. Weiderpass, E. Wolk, A. Schouten, L. J. and van den Brandt, P. A. Chantarakul, N. Koetsawang, S. and Rachawat, D. Palli, D. Black, A. Freedman, D. M. Hartge, P. Hsing, A. W. Lacey, Jr., J. V. Hoover, R. N. and Schairer, C. Urban, M. Graff-Iversen, S. Selmer, R. and Bain, C. J. Green, A. C. Purdie, D. M. Siskind, V. Webb, P. M. Moysich, K. McCann, S. E. Hannaford, P. Kay, C. and Binns, C. W. Lee, A. H. Zhang, M. Nasca, P. Coogan, P. F. Palmer, J. R. Rosenberg, L. Kelsey, J. and Paffenbarger, R. Whittemore, A. Katsouyanni, K. and Trichopoulou, A. Trichopoulos, D. Tzonou, A. Dabancens, A. and Martinez, L. Molina, R. Salas, O. Goodman, M. T. and Lurie, G. Carney, M. E. Wilkens, L. R. Hartman, L. and Manjer, J. Olsson, H. Grisso, J. A. Morgan, M. Wheeler, J. E. Bunker, C. H. Edwards, R. P. Modugno, F. and Casagrande, J. Pike, M. C. Ross, R. K. Wu, A. H. Miller, A. B. Kumle, M. Gram, I. T. Lund, E. McGowan, L. and Shu, X. O. Zheng, W. Farley, T. M. M. Holck, S. Meirik, O. Risch, H. A. Collaborative Grp Epidemiological Natl Israeli Study Ovarian Canc Nurses Hlth Study

Abstract

Background Smoking has been linked to mucinous ovarian cancer, but its effects on other ovarian cancer subtypes and on overall ovarian cancer risk are unclear, and the findings from most studies with relevant data are unpublished. To assess these associations, we review the published and unpublished evidence. Methods Eligible epidemiological studies were identified by electronic searches, review articles, and discussions with colleagues. Individual participant data for 28 114 women with and 94 942 without ovarian cancer from 51 epidemiological studies were analysed centrally, yielding adjusted relative risks (RRs) of ovarian cancer in smokers compared with never smokers. Findings After exclusion of studies with hospital controls, in which smoking could have affected recruitment, overall ovarian cancer incidence was only slightly increased in current smokers compared with women who had never smoked (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.11, p=0.01). Of 17 641 epithelial cancers with specified histology, 2314 (13%) were mucinous, 2360 (13%) endometrioid, 969 (5%) clear-cell, and 9086 (52%) serous. Smoking-related risks varied substantially across these subtypes (p(heterogeneity)

Published
2012

7. Ovarian Cancer and Body Size: Individual Participant Meta-Analysis Including 25,157 Women with Ovarian Cancer from 47 Epidemiological Studies

Author

Beral, V. Hermon, C. Peto, R. Reeves, G. Brinton, L. and Marchbanks, P. Negri, E. Ness, R. Peeters, P. H. M. and Vessey, M. Calle, E. E. Gapstur, S. M. Patel, A. V. Dal Maso, L. Talamini, R. Chetrit, A. Hirsh-Yechezkel, G. and Lubin, F. Sadetzki, S. Allen, N. Bull, D. Callaghan, K. and Crossley, B. Gaitskell, K. Goodill, A. Green, J. and Key, T. Moser, K. Collins, R. Doll, R. Gonzalez, C. A. and Lee, N. Ory, H. W. Peterson, H. B. Wingo, P. A. and Martin, N. Pardthaisong, T. Silpisornkosol, S. Theetranont, C. Boosiri, B. Chutivongse, S. Jimakorn, P. Virutamasen, P. Wongsrichanalai, C. Tjonneland, A. Titus-Ernstoff, L. and Byers, T. Rohan, T. Mosgaard, B. J. Yeates, D. and Freudenheim, J. L. Chang-Claude, J. Kaaks, R. Anderson, K. E. Folsom, A. Robien, K. Rossing, M. A. Thomas, D. B. and Weiss, N. S. Riboli, E. Clavel-Chapelon, F. Cramer, D. and Hankinson, S. E. Tworoger, S. S. Franceschi, S. La Vecchia, C. Magnusson, C. Riman, T. Weiderpass, E. Wolk, A. Schouten, L. J. van den Brandt, P. A. Chantarakul, N. and Koetsawang, S. Rachawat, D. Palli, D. Black, A. de Gonzalez, A. Berrington Freedman, D. M. Hartge, P. Hsing, A. W. Lacey, Jr., J. V. Hoover, R. N. Schairer, C. and Graff-Iversen, S. Selmer, R. Bain, C. J. Green, A. C. and Purdie, D. M. Siskind, V. Webb, P. M. McCann, S. E. and Hannaford, P. Kay, C. Binns, C. W. Lee, A. H. Zhang, M. and Ness, R. B. Nasca, P. Coogan, P. F. Palmer, J. R. and Rosenberg, L. Kelsey, J. Paffenbarger, R. Whittemore, A. and Katsouyanni, K. Trichopoulou, A. Trichopoulos, D. Tzonou, A. and Dabancens, A. Martinez, L. Molina, R. Salas, O. and Goodman, M. T. Lurie, G. Carney, M. E. Wilkens, L. R. and Hartman, L. Manjer, J. Olsson, H. Grisso, J. A. Morgan, M. Wheeler, J. E. Casagrande, J. Pike, M. C. Ross, R. K. and Wu, A. H. Miller, A. B. Kumle, M. Lund, E. McGowan, L. Shu, X. O. Zheng, W. Farley, T. M. M. Holck, S. and Meirik, O. Risch, H. A. Collaborative Grp Epidemiol Studie

Abstract

Background: Only about half the studies that have collected information on the relevance of women’s height and body mass index to their risk of developing ovarian cancer have published their results, and findings are inconsistent. Here, we bring together the worldwide evidence, published and unpublished, and describe these relationships. Methods and Findings: Individual data on 25,157 women with ovarian cancer and 81,311 women without ovarian cancer from 47 epidemiological studies were collected, checked, and analysed centrally. Adjusted relative risks of ovarian cancer were calculated, by height and by body mass index. Ovarian cancer risk increased significantly with height and with body mass index, except in studies using hospital controls. For other study designs, the relative risk of ovarian cancer per 5 cm increase in height was 1.07 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.09; p

Published
2012

8. Ovarian cancer and oral contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of data from 45 epidemiological studies including 23 257 women with ovarian cancer and 87 303 controls

Author

Beral, V. Doll, R. Hermon, C. Peto, R. Reeves, G. and Brinton, L. Green, A. C. Marchbanks, P. Negri, E. Ness, R. Peeters, P. Vessey, M. Calle, E. E. Rodriguez, C. and Dal Maso, L. Talamini, R. Cramer, D. Hankinson, S. E. and Tworoger, S. S. Chetrit, A. Hirsh-Yechezkel, G. Lubin, F. and Sadetzki, S. Appleby, P. Banks, E. de Gonzalez, A. Berrington Bull, D. Crossley, B. Goodil, A. Green, I. and Green, J. Key, T. Collins, R. Gonzalez, C. A. Lee, N. Ory, H. W. Peterson, H. B. Wingo, P. A. Martin, N. and Pardthaisong, T. Silpisornkosol, S. Theetranont, C. and Boosiri, B. Chutivongse, S. Jimakorn, P. Virutamasen, P. and Wongsrichanalai, C. Titus-Ernstoff, L. Mosgaard, M. J. and Yeates, D. Chang-Claude, J. Rossing, M. A. Thomas, D. and Weiss, N. Franceschi, S. La Vecchia, C. Adami, H. O. and Magnusson, C. Riman, T. Weiderpass, E. Wolk, A. Brinton, L. A. Freedman, D. M. Hartge, P. Lacey, J. M. Hoover, R. and Schouten, L. J. van den Brandt, P. A. Chantarakul, N. and Koetsawang, S. Rachawat, D. Graff-Iversen, S. Selmer, R. and Bain, C. J. Green, A. C. Purdie, D. M. Siskind, V. Webb, P. M. McCann, S. E. Hannaford, P. Kay, C. Binns, C. W. and Lee, A. H. Zhang, M. Nasca, P. Coogan, P. F. Kelsey, J. Paffenbarger, R. Whittemore, A. Katsouyanni, K. and Trichopoulou, A. Trichopoulos, D. Tzonou, A. Dabancens, A. and Martinez, L. Molina, R. Salas, O. Goodman, M. T. and Laurie, G. Carney, M. E. Wilkens, L. R. Bladstrom, A. and Olsson, H. Ness, R. B. Grisso, J. A. Morgan, M. Wheeler, J. E. Peeters, P. Casagrande, J. Pike, M. C. Ross, R. K. and Wu, A. H. Kumle, M. Lund, E. McGowan, L. Shu, X. O. and Zheng, W. Farley, T. M. M. Holck, S. Meirik, O. and Risch, H. A. Collaborative Grp Epidemiological

Abstract

Background Oral contraceptives were introduced almost 50 years ago, and over 100 million women currently use them. Oral contraceptives can reduce the risk of ovarian cancer, but the eventual public-health effects of this reduction will depend on how long the protection lasts after use ceases. We aimed to assess these effects. Methods Individual data for 23 257 women with ovarian cancer (cases) and 87 303 without ovarian cancer (controls) from 45 epidemiological studies in 21 countries were checked and analysed centrally. The relative risk of ovarian cancer in relation to oral contraceptive use was estimated, stratifying by study, age, parity, and hysterectomy. Findings Overall 7308 (31%) cases and 32 717 (37%) controls had ever used oral contraceptives, for average durations among users of 4 . 4 and 5 . 0 years, respectively. The median year of cancer diagnosis was 1993, when cases were aged an average of 56 years. The longer that women had used oral contraceptives, the greater the reduction in ovarian cancer risk (p

Published
2008

9. Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer--collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58,515 women with breast cancer and 95,067 women without the disease

Author

Peterson, B., Ontiveros, P., Yu, M. C., Heath, C. W., Bergkvist, L., Baines, C. J., Malone, K., Magnusson, C., Lubin, F., Kungu, A., Kay, C., Pike, M., Siskind, V., Virutamasen, P., Hermon, C., Brêmond, A., Lacaya, L. B., Bain, C., Calle, E. E., Aristizabal, N., Gatei, D., Ngelangel, C. A., Bull, D., Fentiman, I. S., Leske, M. C., Hannaford, P., Pike, M. C., Viladiu, P., Wang, D. Y., Peto, J., White, E., Weinstein, A. L., Theetranont, C., Fraser, G., La Vecchia, C., Martinez, L., Evstifeeva, T., Holck, S., Jin, F., Shearman, R., Nasca, P. C., Wang, Q. S., Stanford, J. L., Chilvers, C. E.D., Tulinius, H., Bishop, T., Coldman, A. J., Salazar, S. B., Gallagher, R. P., Peto, R., Reeves, G., Hiatt, R. A., Kunde, D., Boyle, P., Kenya, P., Molina, R., Salas, O., Negri, E., Liff, J. M., Primic-Zakelj, M., Lee, N., Doll, R., Anderson, K., Schairer, C., Band, P., Goodill, A., Goldbohm, R. A., Katsouyanni, K., Hu, J., Mao, Y., Noonan, E. A., Hislop, T. G., Meirik, O., Cuadros, A., Clavel, F., Ursin, G., Boosiri, B., Lansac, J., Schofield, F., Renaud, R., Kosmelj, K., Kolonel, L. M., Hulka, B., Berry, G., Daling, J. R., Jones, L., Mati, J. G., Hulka, B. S., McCredie, M., Spears, G. F.S., Trichopoulou, A., Schuman, L., Farley, T. M.M., Ravnihar, B., Wei, H. Y., Key, T., Skegg, D. C.G., Lewis, C., Bernstein, L., Miller, A. B., Hanson, R. L., Ross, R. K., Martin, N., Rohan, T., Collins, R., Yuan, J. M., Colditz, G., Gao, Y. T., MacLennan, R., Segala, C., Weiss, N. S., Cooper Booth, J., Andrieu, N., Banks, E., Richardson, S., van Leeuwen, F. E., Newcomb, P., Gammon, M. D., Wongsrichanalai, C., Friedman, G. D., Szklo, M., Baens, J., van den Brandt, P. A., Alexander, F. E., Wilson, H. G., Spirtas, R., Tajima, K., Gerber, M., Franceschi, S., Stare, J., Ron, E., Jelihovsky, T., Mabuchi, K., Piana, L., Wall, C., Schoenberg, J. A., Koetsawang, S., Apelo, R. A., Marchbanks, P., Stewart, W., Van Leeuven, M., Jimakorn, P., Beeson, W. L., Pardthaisong, T., Tryggvadottir, L., Zheng, W., Adami, H. O., Coates, R. J., Palet, A., Wingo, P. A., Thomas, D. B., Thomas, D., Enger, S., Trichopoulos, D., Chutivongse, S., Bulbrook, R. D., Rosero-Bixby, L., Gajalakshmi, V., de la Cruz, J. R., Hopper, J. L., Muller, A., Zhiheng, C., Beral, V., Hamajima, N., Ewertz, M., Varma, A. O., Nomura, A. M.Y., Rookus, M. A., Lee, H. P., Ebeling, K., Cuzick, J., Yang, P., Cuevas, H. R., Peterson, H. B., Izquierdo, A., Brinton, L. A., Nishan, P., Clarke, E. A., Hayward, J. L., Crossley, B., Yun, T., Kalache, A., Moller, T. R., Hutchinson, W. B., Green, J., Marubini, E., Hoover, R., Wax, Y., Modan, B., Ory, H. W., Duffy, S. W., Ranstam, J., Olsson, H., Lund, E., Gairard, B., Ferraroni, M., Paganini-Hill, A., Appleby, P., Shu, X. O., Vessey, M., Haile, R. W., Dabancens, A., Folsom, A. R., Langston, N., Talamini, R., Skegg, D., Neil, A., Chang-Claude, J., Bachelot, A., McMichael, A. J., Javier, B., Persson, I., Paul, C., Mahoney, M. C., Hirose, K., Rachawat, D., De Sanjosé, S., Longnecker, M. P., Johnson, K. C., Morabia, A., Preston, D., Levi, F., Silpisornkosol, S., Stalsberg, H., McPherson, K., Yeates, D., Lê, M. G., Chantarakul, N., Clavel-Chapelon, F., Secretariat, Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Beral V, Hamajima N, Hirose K, Rohan T, Calle EE, Heath CW, Coates RJ, Liff JM, Talamini R, Chantarakul N, Koetsawang S, Rachawat D, Morabia A, Schuman L, Stewart W, Szklo M, Bain C, Schofield F, Siskind V, Band P, Coldman AJ, Gallagher RP, Hislop TG, Yang P, Kolonel LM, Nomura AMY, Hu J, Johnson KC, Mao Y, De Sanjose S, Lee N, Marchbanks P, Ory HW, Peterson HB, Wilson HG, Wingo PA, Ebeling K, Kunde D, Nishan P, Hopper JL, Colditz G, Gajalakshmi V, Martin N, Pardthaisong T, Solpisornkosol S, Theetranont C, Boosiri B, Chutivongse S, Jimakorn P, Virutamasen P, Wongsrichanalai C, Ewertz M, Adami HO, Bergkvist L, Magnusson C, Persson I, Chang-Claude J, Paul C, Skegg DCG, Spears GFS, Boyle P, Evstifeeva T, Daling JR, Hutchinson WB, Malone K, Noonan EA, Stanford JL, Thomas DB, Weiss NS, White E, Andrieu N, Bremond A, Clavel F, Gairard B, Lansac J, Piana L, Renaud R, Izquierdo A, Viladiu P, Cuevas HR, Ontiveros P, Palet A, Salazar SB, Arsitizabal N, Cuadros A, Tryggvadottir L, Tulinius H, Bachelot A, Le MG, Peto J, Franceschi S, Lubin F, Modan B, Ron E, Wax Y, Friedman GD, Hiatt RA, Levi F, Bishop T, Kosmelj K, Primic-Zakelj M, Ravnihar B, Stare J, Beeson WL, Fraser G, Bulbrook RD, Cuzick J, Duffy SW, Fentiman IS, Hayward JL, Wang DY, McMichael AJ, McPherson K, Hanson RL, Leske MC, Mahoney MC, Nasca PC, Varma AO, Weinstein AL, Moller TR, Olsson H, Ranstam J, Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA, Apelo RA, Baens J, de la Cruz JR, Javier B, Lacaya LB, Ngelangel CA, La Vecchia C, Negri E, Marubini E, Ferraroni M, Gerber M, Richardson S, Segala C, Gatei D, Kenya P, Kungu A, Mati JG, Brinton LA, Hoover R, Schairer C, Spirtas R, Lee HP, Rookus MA, van Leeuwen FE, Schoenberg JA, McCredie M, Gammon MD, Clarke EA, Jones L, Neil A, Vessey M, Yeates D, Appleby P, Banks E, Bull D, Crossley B, Goodill A, Green J, Hermon C, Key T, Langston N, Lewis C, Reeves G, Collins R, Doll R, Peto R, Mabuchi K, Preston D, Hannaford P, Kay C, Rosero-Bixby L, Gao YT, Jin F, Yuan JM, Wei HY, Yun T, Zhiheng C, Berry G, Cooper Booth J, Jelihovsky T, MacLennan R, Shearman R, Wang QS, Baines CJ, Miller AB, Wall C, Lund E, Stalsberg H, Shu XO, Zheng W, Katsouyanni K, Trichopoulou A, Trichopoulos D, Dabancens A, Martinez L, Molina R, Salas O, Alexander XE, Anderson K, Folsom AR, Hulka BS, Bernstein L, Enger S, Haile RW, Paganini-Hill A, Pike MC, Ross RK, Ursin G, Yu MC, Longnecker MP, Newcomb P, Kalache A, Farley TMM, Holck S, Meirik O, and Universitat de Barcelona

Subjects
Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, Epidemiology, Dones, Alcohol, tobacco, smoking, Càncer de mama, chemistry.chemical_compound, Breast cancer, Hàbit de fumar, breast cancer, Tabac, Tobacco, [SDV.SPEE] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Public Health and Epidemiology, medicine, Women, Gynecology, collaborative reanalysis, Obstetrics, business.industry, alcohol, Confounding, Smoking, medicine.disease, Tobbacco habit, Oncology, chemistry, Drinking of alcoholic beverages, [SDV.SPEE] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie, Meta-analysis, Relative risk, Consum d'alcohol, Risk assessment, business, Developed country
Abstract

COLLABORATORS (in alphabetical order of institution, study name, or location) Aichi Cancer Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan: N Hamajima, K Hirose, K Tajima; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NY, USA: T Rohan; American Cancer Society, GA, USA: EE Calle, CW Jr Heath; Atlanta, Emory University, GA, USA: RJ Coates, JM Liff; Aviano Cancer Center, Pordenone, Italy: R Talamini; Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand: N Chantarakul, S Koetsawang, D Rachawat; Breast Tumor Collaborative Study, Johns Hopkins University, MD, USA: A Morabia, L Schuman, W Stewart, M Szklo; University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia: C Bain, F Schofield, V Siskind; British Columbia Cancer Agency, BC, Canada: P Band, AJ Coldman, RP Gallagher, TG Hislop, P Yang; Cancer Research Center, University of Hawaii, Hawaii, USA: LM Kolonel, AMY Nomura; Canadian Cancer Registries Epidemiology Research Group, Canada: J Hu, KC Johnson, Y Mao; Catalán Institut of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain: S De Sanjosé; Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, GA, USA: N Lee, P Marchbanks, HW Ory, HB Peterson, HG Wilson, PA Wingo; Central Institute of Cancer Research, Berlin, Germany: K Ebeling, D Kunde, P Nishan; Centre for Genetic Epidemiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia: JL Hopper; Channing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, USA: G Colditz for Nurses' Health Study Research Group; Chennai Cancer Institute, Madras, India: V Gajalakshmi; Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand: N Martin, T Pardthaisong, S Silpisornkosol, C Theetranont; Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand: B Boosiri, S Chutivongse, P Jimakorn, P Virutamasen, C Wongsrichanalai; Danish Cancer Society, Aalborg, Denmark: M Ewertz; Department of Medical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden: HO Adami, L Bergkvist, C Magnusson, I Persson; Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany: J Chang-Claude; University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand: C Paul, DCG Skegg, GFS Spears; European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy: P Boyle, T Evstifeeva; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, WA, USA: JR Daling, WB Hutchinson, K Malone, EA Noonan, JL Stanford, DB Thomas, NS Weiss, E White; French Multicentre Breast Study, INSERM, Villejuif, France: N Andrieu, A Brêmond, F Clavel, B Gairard, J Lansac, L Piana, R Renaud; Girona Cancer Registry, Girona, Spain: A Izquierdo, P Viladiu; Hospital General de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico: HR Cuevas, P Ontiveros, A Palet, SB Salazar; Hospital Universitario, Cali, Colombia: N Aristizabal, A Cuadros; Icelandic Cancer Society, Reykjavik, Iceland: L Tryggvadottir, H Tulinius; INSERM, Institut Gustave-Roussey, Villejuif, France: A Bachelot, MG Lê; Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK: J Peto; International Agency for Research in Cancer, Lyon, France: S Franceschi; Israel Chaim Sheba Medical Centre, Tel-Hashomer, Israel: F Lubin, B Modan, E Ron, Y Wax; Kaiser Permanente, CA, USA: GD Friedman, RA Hiatt; Institut universitaire de medecine sociale et preventive, Lausanne, Switzerland: F Levi; Cancer Research UK Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Leeds, UK: T Bishop; Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia: K Kosmelj, M Primic-Zakelj, B Ravnihar, J Stare; Loma Linda University, CA, USA: WL Beeson, G Fraser; Cancer Research UK Department of Mathematics, Statistics & Epidemiology, London: RD Bulbrook, J Cuzick, SW Duffy, IS Fentiman, JL Hayward, DY Wang; London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK: AJ McMichael, K McPherson; Long Island Breast Cancer Study, NY, USA: RL Hanson, MC Leske, MC Mahoney, PC Nasca, AO Varma, AL Weinstein; University Hospital, Lund, Sweden: TR Moller, H Olsson, J Ranstam; Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands: RA Goldbohm, PA van den Brandt; University of Philippines, Manila, Philippines: RA Apelo, J Baens, JR de la Cruz, B Javier, LB Lacaya, CA Ngelangel; Istituto ‘Mario Negri', Milan, Italy: C La Vecchia, E Negri; Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Divisione di Statistica Medica e Biometria, Milan, Italy: E Marubini; Istituto di Statistica Medica e Biometria, Milan, Italy: M Ferraroni; Montpellier Cancer Centre & INSERM, Montpellier, France: M Gerber, S Richardson, C Segala; Nairobi Centre for Research in Reproduction, Nairobi, Kenya: D Gatei, P Kenya, A Kungu, JG Mati; National Cancer Institute, MD, USA: LA Brinton, R Hoover, C Schairer; National Institute of Child Health & Human Development, MD, USA: R Spirtas; National University of Singapore, Singapore: HP Lee; The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: MA Rookus, FE van Leeuwen for the Netherlands Oral Contraceptives and Breast Cancer Study Group; New Jersey State Department of Health, NJ, USA: JA Schoenberg; New South Wales Cancer Council, Sydney, Australia: M McCredie; Columbia University School of Public Health, NY, USA: MD Gammon; Ontario Cancer Treatment & Research Foundation, Ontario, Canada: EA Clarke; Department of Public Health & Primary Care, Oxford, UK: L Jones, A Neil, M Vessey, D Yeates; Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Oxford, UK (Secretariat): P Appleby, E Banks, V Beral, D Bull, B Crossley, A Goodill, J Green, C Hermon, T Key, N Langston, C Lewis, G Reeves; Cancer Research UK/MRC/BHF Clinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit, Oxford, UK: R Collins, R Doll, R Peto; Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan: K Mabuchi, D Preston; Royal College of General Practitioners Oral Contraception Study, London, UK: P Hannaford, C Kay; University of Costa Rica, San Jose, Costa Rica: L Rosero-Bixby; Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China: YT Gao, F Jin, J-M Yuan; Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research, Shanghai, China: HY Wei, T Yun, C Zhiheng; Department of Public Health, Sydney, Australia: G Berry, J Cooper Booth, T Jelihovsky, R MacLennan, R Shearman; Tianjin Cancer Institute, Tianjin, China: Q-S Wang; Department of Public Health Sciences, Toronto, Canada: CJ Baines, AB Miller, C Wall; Tromso University, Tromso, Norway: E Lund, H Stalsberg; Vanderbilt University, TN, USA: XO Shu, W Zheng; University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece: K Katsouyanni, A Trichopoulou, D Trichopoulos; University of Chile, Santiago, Chile: A Dabancens, L Martinez, R Molina, O Salas; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK: FE Alexander; University of Minnesota School of Public Health, MN, USA: K Anderson, AR Folsom on behalf of the Iowa Women's Health Study; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Public Health, NC, USA: BS Hulka; University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK: CED Chilvers; University of Southern California, LA, USA: L Bernstein, S Enger, RW Haile, A Paganini-Hill, MC Pike, RK Ross, G Ursin, MC Yu; University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center, WI, USA: MP Longnecker, P Newcomb for the 4 State Study; Vasteras, Sweden: L Bergkvist; World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland: A Kalache; World Health Organisation, UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Geneva, Switzerland: TMM Farley, S Holck, O Meirik. Analysis and writing committee: Beral V, Bull D, Doll R, Peto R, Reeves G Steering committee: Skegg D (Chairman), Colditz G, Hulka B, La Vecchia C, Magnusson C, Muller A, Peterson B, Pike M, Thomas D, Van Leeuven M.; International audience; Alcohol and tobacco consumption are closely correlated and published results on their association with breast cancer have not always allowed adequately for confounding between these exposures. Over 80% of the relevant information worldwide on alcohol and tobacco consumption and breast cancer were collated, checked and analysed centrally. Analyses included 58,515 women with invasive breast cancer and 95,067 controls from 53 studies. Relative risks of breast cancer were estimated, after stratifying by study, age, parity and, where appropriate, women's age when their first child was born and consumption of alcohol and tobacco. The average consumption of alcohol reported by controls from developed countries was 6.0 g per day, i.e. about half a unit/drink of alcohol per day, and was greater in ever-smokers than never-smokers, (8.4 g per day and 5.0 g per day, respectively). Compared with women who reported drinking no alcohol, the relative risk of breast cancer was 1.32 (1.19-1.45, P/=45 g per day alcohol. The relative risk of breast cancer increased by 7.1% (95% CI 5.5-8.7%; P

Published
2002

10. Ovarian Cancer and Body Size : Individual Participant Meta-Analysis Including 25,157 Women with Ovarian Cancer from 47 Epidemiological Studies

Author

Beral, V., Hermon, C., Peto, R., Reeves, G., Brinton, L., Marchbanks, P., Negri, E., Ness, R., Peeters, P. H. M., Vessey, M., Calle, E. E., Gapstur, S. M., Patel, A. V., Dal Maso, L., Talamini, R., Chetrit, A., Hirsh-Yechezkel, G., Lubin, F., Sadetzki, S., Allen, N., Bull, D., Callaghan, K., Crossley, B., Gaitskell, K., Goodill, A., Green, J., Key, T., Moser, K., Collins, R., Doll, R., Gonzalez, C. A., Lee, N., Ory, H. W., Peterson, H. B., Wingo, P. A., Martin, N., Pardthaisong, T., Silpisornkosol, S., Theetranont, C., Boosiri, B., Chutivongse, S., Jimakorn, P., Virutamasen, P., Wongsrichanalai, C., Tjonneland, A., Titus-Ernstoff, L., Byers, T., Rohan, T., Mosgaard, B. J., Yeates, D., Freudenheim, J. L., Chang-Claude, J., Kaaks, R., Anderson, K. E., Folsom, A., Robien, K., Rossing, M. A., Thomas, D. B., Weiss, N. S., Riboli, E., Clavel-Chapelon, F., Cramer, D., Hankinson, S. E., Tworoger, S. S., Franceschi, S., La Vecchia, C., Magnusson, C., Riman, T., Weiderpass, E., Wolk, A., Schouten, L. J., van den Brandt, P. A., Chantarakul, N., Koetsawang, S., Rachawat, D., Palli, D., Black, A., de Gonzalez, A. Berrington, Freedman, D. M., Hartge, P., Hsing, A. W., Lacey, J. V., Jr., Hoover, R. N., Schairer, C., Graff-Iversen, S., Selmer, R., Bain, C. J., Green, A. C., Purdie, D. M., Siskind, V., Webb, P. M., McCann, S. E., Hannaford, P., Kay, C., Binns, C. W., Lee, A. H., Zhang, M., Ness, R. B., Nasca, P., Coogan, P. F., Palmer, J. R., Rosenberg, L., Kelsey, J., Paffenbarger, R., Whittemore, A., Katsouyanni, K., Trichopoulou, A., Trichopoulos, D., Tzonou, A., Dabancens, A., Martinez, L., Molina, R., Salas, O., Goodman, M. T., Lurie, G., Carney, M. E., Wilkens, L. R., Hartman, L., Manjer, J., Olsson, H., Grisso, J. A., Morgan, M., Wheeler, J. E., Casagrande, J., Pike, M. C., Ross, R. K., Wu, A. H., Miller, A. B., Kumle, M., Lund, E., McGowan, L., Shu, X. O., Zheng, W., Farley, T. M. M., Holck, S., Meirik, O., Risch, H. A., Beral, V., Hermon, C., Peto, R., Reeves, G., Brinton, L., Marchbanks, P., Negri, E., Ness, R., Peeters, P. H. M., Vessey, M., Calle, E. E., Gapstur, S. M., Patel, A. V., Dal Maso, L., Talamini, R., Chetrit, A., Hirsh-Yechezkel, G., Lubin, F., Sadetzki, S., Allen, N., Bull, D., Callaghan, K., Crossley, B., Gaitskell, K., Goodill, A., Green, J., Key, T., Moser, K., Collins, R., Doll, R., Gonzalez, C. A., Lee, N., Ory, H. W., Peterson, H. B., Wingo, P. A., Martin, N., Pardthaisong, T., Silpisornkosol, S., Theetranont, C., Boosiri, B., Chutivongse, S., Jimakorn, P., Virutamasen, P., Wongsrichanalai, C., Tjonneland, A., Titus-Ernstoff, L., Byers, T., Rohan, T., Mosgaard, B. J., Yeates, D., Freudenheim, J. L., Chang-Claude, J., Kaaks, R., Anderson, K. E., Folsom, A., Robien, K., Rossing, M. A., Thomas, D. B., Weiss, N. S., Riboli, E., Clavel-Chapelon, F., Cramer, D., Hankinson, S. E., Tworoger, S. S., Franceschi, S., La Vecchia, C., Magnusson, C., Riman, T., Weiderpass, E., Wolk, A., Schouten, L. J., van den Brandt, P. A., Chantarakul, N., Koetsawang, S., Rachawat, D., Palli, D., Black, A., de Gonzalez, A. Berrington, Freedman, D. M., Hartge, P., Hsing, A. W., Lacey, J. V., Jr., Hoover, R. N., Schairer, C., Graff-Iversen, S., Selmer, R., Bain, C. J., Green, A. C., Purdie, D. M., Siskind, V., Webb, P. M., McCann, S. E., Hannaford, P., Kay, C., Binns, C. W., Lee, A. H., Zhang, M., Ness, R. B., Nasca, P., Coogan, P. F., Palmer, J. R., Rosenberg, L., Kelsey, J., Paffenbarger, R., Whittemore, A., Katsouyanni, K., Trichopoulou, A., Trichopoulos, D., Tzonou, A., Dabancens, A., Martinez, L., Molina, R., Salas, O., Goodman, M. T., Lurie, G., Carney, M. E., Wilkens, L. R., Hartman, L., Manjer, J., Olsson, H., Grisso, J. A., Morgan, M., Wheeler, J. E., Casagrande, J., Pike, M. C., Ross, R. K., Wu, A. H., Miller, A. B., Kumle, M., Lund, E., McGowan, L., Shu, X. O., Zheng, W., Farley, T. M. M., Holck, S., Meirik, O., and Risch, H. A.

Abstract

Background: Only about half the studies that have collected information on the relevance of women's height and body mass index to their risk of developing ovarian cancer have published their results, and findings are inconsistent. Here, we bring together the worldwide evidence, published and unpublished, and describe these relationships. Methods and Findings: Individual data on 25,157 women with ovarian cancer and 81,311 women without ovarian cancer from 47 epidemiological studies were collected, checked, and analysed centrally. Adjusted relative risks of ovarian cancer were calculated, by height and by body mass index. Ovarian cancer risk increased significantly with height and with body mass index, except in studies using hospital controls. For other study designs, the relative risk of ovarian cancer per 5 cm increase in height was 1.07 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.09; p<0.001); this relationship did not vary significantly by women's age, year of birth, education, age at menarche, parity, menopausal status, smoking, alcohol consumption, having had a hysterectomy, having first degree relatives with ovarian or breast cancer, use of oral contraceptives, or use of menopausal hormone therapy. For body mass index, there was significant heterogeneity (p<0.001) in the findings between ever-users and never-users of menopausal hormone therapy, but not by the 11 other factors listed above. The relative risk for ovarian cancer per 5 kg/m(2) increase in body mass index was 1.10 (95% CI, 1.07-1.13; p<0.001) in never-users and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.99; p = 0.02) in ever-users of hormone therapy. Conclusions: Ovarian cancer is associated with height and, among never-users of hormone therapy, with body mass index. In high-income countries, both height and body mass index have been increasing in birth cohorts now developing the disease. If all other relevant factors had remained constant, then these increases in height and weight would be associated with

Published
2012
Full Text
View/download PDF

11. Suggested Modifications to Optical Sensor Algorithms in JANUS

Author

RAND CORP SANTA MONICA CA, Bailey, H. H., Mundie, L. G., Ory, H. A., RAND CORP SANTA MONICA CA, Bailey, H. H., Mundie, L. G., and Ory, H. A.

Abstract

Optical sensor algorithms in the JANUS (T) ground combat simulation do not include a repeated detection criterion for target acquisition and weapon firing, nor do they provide for the effects of false detections. As a result, targets detected with very low probability, such as those at ranges near the performance limit of the sensor, will often give rise to acquisition and weapon firing decisions when rare single detections result from coverage by many sensors and time cycles. This Note reviews the detection algorithms for optical sensors implemented in JANUS (T), identifies some approximations that can lead to overoptimistic estimates of target acquisition probabilities when the calculated detection probability is small, and suggests an acquisition criterion that alleviates the problem., Air Force contract F49620-86-C-0059.

Published
1990

14. Estimates of the risk of cardiovascular death attributable to low-dose oral contraceptives in the United States.

Author

Schwingl, P J, Ory, H W, and Visness, C M

Abstract

Objective: Our purpose was to estimate the annual risk of death in the United States from cardiovascular disease attributable to low-dose combination oral contraceptives.Study Design: Estimates of the risk of death from cardiovascular disease attributable to low-dose oral contraceptives were modeled on data from studies published through 1997 and from age-specific mortality rates in the United States for 1993 and 1994.Results: Attributable risk of death from cardiovascular disease resulting from oral contraceptive use is 0.06 and 3.0 per 100,000 nonsmokers 15 to 34 years of age and 35 to 44 years of age, respectively. In smokers this risk increases, respectively, to 1.73 and 19.4 per 100,000 users in these 2 age groups; however, 97% and 85% of this risk is due to the combined effects of smoking and using oral contraceptives. The attributable risk of death from cardiovascular disease in nonsmoking oral contraceptive users is lower than the risk of death from pregnancy in nonusers of oral contraceptives at all ages; however, among smoking oral contraceptive users more than 35 years of age, the excess risk of death from oral contraceptives is higher than the risk of death from pregnancy.Conclusion: There is virtually no excess attributable risk of death from cardiovascular disease related to oral contraceptive use in young women. However, smokers more than 35 years of age should use a nonestrogen contraceptive. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
1999
Full Text
View/download PDF

19. The evaluation of the data collection process for a multicenter, population-based, case-control design.

Author

Wingo, P A, Ory, H W, Layde, P M, and Lee, N C

Abstract

This report details the methods the authors used to conduct the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study, a multicenter, population-based, case-control study of oral contraceptive use in relation to breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancer diagnosed during 1980-1982. The authors have documented their methods and rationale, and the results of their data collection efforts as a practical guide for the planning and conduct of large case-control studies. They observed the following: 1) the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program is a useful epidemiologic resource for identifying cases from which to evaluate risk factors for cancer in the United States; 2) random digit dialing is an effective and efficient method for screening for eligible controls for a population-based study; 3) with the cooperation of community pathologists, histologic specimen slides can be retrieved and reviewed for diagnostic confirmation and histologic subclassification of cancer for greater than 95% of the cases interviewed; and 4) data reported during personal interviews of study participants can be validated by reviewing medical records for more than 75% of study participants who reported medical events that occurred during the 10 years before the beginning of the study.

Published
1988
Full Text
View/download PDF

20. Cumulative prevalence rates and corrected incidence rates of surgical sterilization among women in the United States, 1971--1978.

Author

Nolan, T F, Ory, H W, Layde, P M, Hughes, J M, and Greenspan, J R

Abstract

The authors used data from the 1970 National Fertility Survey and Centers for Disease Control surveillance of surgical sterilizations to estimate the cumulative prevalences of hysterectomy and tubal sterilization among women of reproductive age in the United States between 1971 and 1978. In 1978, the cumulative prevalence rate of tubal sterilization was more than twice as high for women aged 15--44 years as it was in 1971 and at least three times as high for women under 30. Although the increase in the cumulative prevalence rate of hysterectomy was not as marked, by 1978, 19% of women aged 40--44 had undergone hysterectomy. The authors used the cumulative prevalence rate to estimate the population at risk for surgical sterilization, and calculated the corrected incidence rates for these procedures. While corrected incidence rates of tubal sterilization among women aged 15--44 doubled between 1971 and 1978, corrected hysterectomy rates remained stable. The largest age-specific increase in incidence rates of tubal sterilization was among women 40--44, with rates six times higher in 1978 than in 1971. These findings can be used to recompute incidence rates of endometrial and cervical cancers, abortions, and ectopic pregnancies, allowing more precise analysis of related trends.

Published
1982
Full Text
View/download PDF

21. THE EFFECTS OF RAT PITUITARY AND HYPOTHALAMIC TISSUE TRANSPLANTED IN SUPEROVULATED IMMATURE RATS

Author

HOPKINS, T. F., ORY, H., DESPRES, EMILY, HUSAIN, SAYID. M., and PINCUS, G.

Abstract

The ovulatory response to pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin (PMS) was studied in immature rats bearing adenohypophysial (AP) and hypothalamic median eminence (ME) tissues grafted beneath the kidney capsule. A small piece of liver tissue only was grafted in control rats. PMS (30 i.u.) was administered subcutaneously to all rats on the fourth day after the grafts had been placed. The ovulatory response was depressed in all rats bearing AP tissue alone. Median eminence tissue transplanted from immature rats or from mature rats in various phases of the vaginal oestrous cycle had no effects on ovulation when transplanted alone. When present as a joint graft with AP tissue, pro-oestrous ME augmented the depressing effects on ovulation. In one series of experiments, the average number of ova in 29 liver tissue controls was 34·2 ± 9·6 with all the rats ovulating. The average number of ova in 24 rats bearing AP tissue was 19·7 ± 5·2 with 46% ovulating. In eight rats bearing AP plus early pro-oestrous ME, the average number of ova was 0·25 ± 0·25 with 12·5% ovulating. Augmentation of AP depressing effects was not apparent in rats bearing AP plus dioestrous or oestrous ME tissue. These results show that the ovulatory response to PMS is depressed by AP tissue grafted beneath the kidney capsule and suggests that pro-oestrous ME tissue grafted in close proximity to the AP tissue in some way augments the depressing effects.

Published
1968
Full Text
View/download PDF

22. The Chemistry of Nitrogen Oxides and Ozone in the Disturbed D-Region.

Author

R AND D ASSOCIATES SANTA MONICA CALIF, Ory,H. A., Gilmore,F. R., R AND D ASSOCIATES SANTA MONICA CALIF, Ory,H. A., and Gilmore,F. R.

Abstract

Chemical kinetic calculations are presented which describe the chemistry of nitrogen oxides and ozone in D-region air bombarded by an intense pulse of X-rays as would be produced by nuclear explosions. Relatively latetime behavior is emphasized; early deionization processes are treated in a summary fashion. Special attention is given to the reactions of excited species, which have not been included previously, but which greatly affect the yields of NO, NO2, and O3. Results are given for various altitudes, bombardment intensities, and both day and night conditions. The reactions that mainly control the chemistry are identified, and the effects of the excited species are summarized. (Author)

Published
1971

23. STATISTICAL DETECTION THEORY OF THRESHOLD VISUAL PERFORMANCE

Author

RAND CORP SANTA MONICA CALIF, Ory,H. A., RAND CORP SANTA MONICA CALIF, and Ory,H. A.

Abstract

The document presents the development of a statistical detection model to provide an accurate, quantitative description of threshold visual performance over a wide range of background luminance and target parameters. The work investigates relationships that exist between visual performance and reconnaissance. A statistical theory is developed in which neural excitation noise results from random fluctuations in both target and background luminance, and decision criterion is assumed to be programmed. (Author)

Published
1969

34. Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer--collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58,515 women with breast cancer and 95,067 women without the disease.

Author

Hamajima N, Hirose K, Tajima K, Rohan T, Calle EE, Heath CW Jr, Coates RJ, Liff JM, Talamini R, Chantarakul N, Koetsawang S, Rachawat D, Morabia A, Schuman L, Stewart W, Szklo M, Bain C, Schofield F, Siskind V, Band P, Coldman AJ, Gallagher RP, Hislop TG, Yang P, Kolonel LM, Nomura AM, Hu J, Johnson KC, Mao Y, De Sanjosé S, Lee N, Marchbanks P, Ory HW, Peterson HB, Wilson HG, Wingo PA, Ebeling K, Kunde D, Nishan P, Hopper JL, Colditz G, Gajalanski V, Martin N, Pardthaisong T, Silpisornkosol S, Theetranont C, Boosiri B, Chutivongse S, Jimakorn P, Virutamasen P, Wongsrichanalai C, Ewertz M, Adami HO, Bergkvist L, Magnusson C, Persson I, Chang-Claude J, Paul C, Skegg DC, Spears GF, Boyle P, Evstifeeva T, Daling JR, Hutchinson WB, Malone K, Noonan EA, Stanford JL, Thomas DB, Weiss NS, White E, Andrieu N, Brêmond A, Clavel F, Gairard B, Lansac J, Piana L, Renaud R, Izquierdo A, Viladiu P, Cuevas HR, Ontiveros P, Palet A, Salazar SB, Aristizabel N, Cuadros A, Tryggvadottir L, Tulinius H, Bachelot A, Lê MG, Peto J, Franceschi S, Lubin F, Modan B, Ron E, Wax Y, Friedman GD, Hiatt RA, Levi F, Bishop T, Kosmelj K, Primic-Zakelj M, Ravnihar B, Stare J, Beeson WL, Fraser G, Bullbrook RD, Cuzick J, Duffy SW, Fentiman IS, Hayward JL, Wang DY, McMichael AJ, McPherson K, Hanson RL, Leske MC, Mahoney MC, Nasca PC, Varma AO, Weinstein AL, Moller TR, Olsson H, Ranstam J, Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA, Apelo RA, Baens J, de la Cruz JR, Javier B, Lacaya LB, Ngelangel CA, La Vecchia C, Negri E, Marubini E, Ferraroni M, Gerber M, Richardson S, Segala C, Gatei D, Kenya P, Kungu A, Mati JG, Brinton LA, Hoover R, Schairer C, Spirtas R, Lee HP, Rookus MA, van Leeuwen FE, Schoenberg JA, McCredie M, Gammon MD, Clarke EA, Jones L, Neil A, Vessey M, Yeates D, Appleby P, Banks E, Beral V, Bull D, Crossley B, Goodill A, Green J, Hermon C, Key T, Langston N, Lewis C, Reeves G, Collins R, Doll R, Peto R, Mabuchi K, Preston D, Hannaford P, Kay C, Rosero-Bixby L, Gao YT, Jin F, Yuan JM, Wei HY, Yun T, Zhiheng C, Berry G, Cooper Booth J, Jelihovsky T, MacLennan R, Shearman R, Wang QS, Baines CJ, Miller AB, Wall C, Lund E, Stalsberg H, Shu XO, Zheng W, Katsouyanni K, Trichopoulou A, Trichopoulos D, Dabancens A, Martinez L, Molina R, Salas O, Alexander FE, Anderson K, Folsom AR, Hulka BS, Bernstein L, Enger S, Haile RW, Paganini-Hill A, Pike MC, Ross RK, Ursin G, Yu MC, Longnecker MP, Newcomb P, Bergkvist L, Kalache A, Farley TM, Holck S, and Meirik O

Subjects
Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms epidemiology, Cardiovascular Diseases etiology, Epidemiologic Studies, Female, Humans, Incidence, Middle Aged, Risk Assessment, Alcohol Drinking adverse effects, Breast Neoplasms etiology, Developing Countries, Smoking adverse effects
Abstract

Alcohol and tobacco consumption are closely correlated and published results on their association with breast cancer have not always allowed adequately for confounding between these exposures. Over 80% of the relevant information worldwide on alcohol and tobacco consumption and breast cancer were collated, checked and analysed centrally. Analyses included 58,515 women with invasive breast cancer and 95,067 controls from 53 studies. Relative risks of breast cancer were estimated, after stratifying by study, age, parity and, where appropriate, women's age when their first child was born and consumption of alcohol and tobacco. The average consumption of alcohol reported by controls from developed countries was 6.0 g per day, i.e. about half a unit/drink of alcohol per day, and was greater in ever-smokers than never-smokers, (8.4 g per day and 5.0 g per day, respectively). Compared with women who reported drinking no alcohol, the relative risk of breast cancer was 1.32 (1.19-1.45, P<0.00001) for an intake of 35-44 g per day alcohol, and 1.46 (1.33-1.61, P<0.00001) for >/=45 g per day alcohol. The relative risk of breast cancer increased by 7.1% (95% CI 5.5-8.7%; P<0.00001) for each additional 10 g per day intake of alcohol, i.e. for each extra unit or drink of alcohol consumed on a daily basis. This increase was the same in ever-smokers and never-smokers (7.1% per 10 g per day, P<0.00001, in each group). By contrast, the relationship between smoking and breast cancer was substantially confounded by the effect of alcohol. When analyses were restricted to 22 255 women with breast cancer and 40 832 controls who reported drinking no alcohol, smoking was not associated with breast cancer (compared to never-smokers, relative risk for ever-smokers=1.03, 95% CI 0.98-1.07, and for current smokers=0.99, 0.92-1.05). The results for alcohol and for tobacco did not vary substantially across studies, study designs, or according to 15 personal characteristics of the women; nor were the findings materially confounded by any of these factors. If the observed relationship for alcohol is causal, these results suggest that about 4% of the breast cancers in developed countries are attributable to alcohol. In developing countries, where alcohol consumption among controls averaged only 0.4 g per day, alcohol would have a negligible effect on the incidence of breast cancer. In conclusion, smoking has little or no independent effect on the risk of developing breast cancer; the effect of alcohol on breast cancer needs to be interpreted in the context of its beneficial effects, in moderation, on cardiovascular disease and its harmful effects on cirrhosis and cancers of the mouth, larynx, oesophagus and liver.

Published
2002
Full Text
View/download PDF

35. Estrogen component of OCs.

Author

Kaunitz AM and Ory H

Subjects
Americas, Biology, Contraception, Developed Countries, Disease, Embolism, Endocrine System, Family Planning Services, Heart Diseases, Hormones, Neoplasms, North America, Physiology, United States, Vascular Diseases, Breast Neoplasms, Contraceptives, Oral, Estrogens, Menstruation Disturbances, Myocardial Infarction, Risk Factors, Thromboembolism
Published
1997

36. Epidemiology of venous thromboembolic disease and OC use.

Author

Ory HW

Subjects
Biology, Contraception, Contraceptive Agents, Contraceptive Agents, Female, Disease, Embolism, Family Planning Services, Health, Public Health, Research, Research Design, Vascular Diseases, Bias, Contraceptives, Oral, Desogestrel, Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Thromboembolism
Published
1996

37. Age-specific differences in the relationship between oral contraceptive use and breast cancer.

Author

Wingo PA, Lee NC, Ory HW, Beral V, Peterson HB, and Rhodes P

Subjects
Adult, Age Factors, Breast Neoplasms chemically induced, Case-Control Studies, Confidence Intervals, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Odds Ratio, Risk Factors, Breast Neoplasms epidemiology, Contraceptives, Oral adverse effects
Abstract

Nearly all studies have suggested that the use of oral contraceptives (OC) is not associated with the aggregate risk of breast cancer diagnosed in women aged 20-54. Because of age-specific differences in the breast cancer-parity relationship and because of age-specific differences in other breast cancer risk factors, the Centers for Disease Control reexamined data from the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study to assess whether OC use has different effects on the risk of breast cancer at different ages of diagnosis. This was a population-based case-control study conducted in eight geographic areas in the United States during 1980-1982. In these data, the relationship between the risk of breast cancer and OC use appeared to vary by age at diagnosis. Among women aged 20-34 years at diagnosis or interview, those who had ever used OC had a slightly increased risk of breast cancer (odds ratio 1.4, 95% confidence interval 1.0-2.1) when compared with women of the same ages who had never used OC. Among these women, there were no trends of increasing or decreasing risk with any measure of OC use. Among women aged 35-44 years, there was no association between OC use and breast cancer. Among women aged 45-54 years, those who used OC had a slightly decreased risk of breast cancer (odds ratio 0.9, 95% confidence interval 0.8-1.0). Among these women, the risk estimates decreased significantly with increasing time since first and last use. Although the slightly increased risk estimates for the youngest women are compatible with findings by other investigators, the decreased risk estimates for the oldest women have not been described in as many studies. Available data provide no reasons for changes in prescribing practices or in the use of OC as related to breast cancer risk.

Published
1991

39. Barrier-method contraceptives and pelvic inflammatory disease.

Author

Kelaghan J, Rubin GL, Ory HW, and Layde PM

Subjects
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Intrauterine Devices adverse effects, Methods, Risk, Contraceptive Devices, Female, Contraceptive Devices, Male, Pelvic Inflammatory Disease prevention & control, Spermatocidal Agents
Abstract

The protective effect of barrier-method contraception against pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) was examined by analyzing data from the Women's Health Study, a large multicenter case-control study. We compared the contraceptive methods used by 645 women hospitalized for initial episodes of PID with the contraceptive methods used by 2,509 control subjects reporting no history of PID. The risk of hospitalization for PID in women currently using barrier methods relative to women using all other methods and to women using no method of contraception was 0.6 (95% confidence limits, 0.5 to 0.9) for both comparisons. This protective effect was observed for both chemical and mechanical barrier methods, although it was not statistically significant for the former. The prevention of PID and its sequelae is one of the most important noncontraceptive benefits of barrier methods of contraception.

Published
1982

40. A review of the association between intrauterine devices and acute pelvic inflammatory disease.

Author

Ory HW

Subjects
Adolescent, Adult, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Gonorrhea etiology, Humans, Intrauterine Devices, Copper adverse effects, Parity, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Risk, Intrauterine Devices adverse effects, Pelvic Inflammatory Disease etiology
Abstract

Six controlled epidemiologic studies of the association between intrauterine device (IUD) use and development of acute pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) are reviewed. The strength and weaknesses of each study are discussed as well as the consistencies of the results. All six studies point in the same direction: IUD use is associated with approximately a three-to fivefold increased risk of PID. The consistency of the association in six different studies, in three different countries and by five different investigators is strong evidence that the association is one of cause and effect. Evidence is presented for the biologic plausability of the association. There also is evidence that copper IUDs do not appear to offer any protection from gonococcal PID. Teenagers appear as likely as older women to be similarly affected by the use of IUDs. There is the intriguing but uncomfirmed suggestion that nulliparous IUD users are more likely to suffer from acute PID than are multiparous users. A public health measure that would control this effect of IUD use is to decrease the use of IUDs in populations at high risk of PID.

Published
1978

41. A case-control study of uterine perforations documented at laparoscopy.

Author

White MK, Ory HW, and Goldenberg LA

Subjects
Adult, Age Factors, Female, Hemostasis, Surgical, Humans, Obesity complications, Parity, Pregnancy, Laparoscopy, Sterilization, Tubal adverse effects, Uterine Perforation etiology, Uterine Rupture etiology
Abstract

A case-control analysis was done of 19 cases of uterine perforations which occurred during laparoscopic sterilization at Gardy Memorial Hospital in Atlanta, between February 1, 1974, and January 31, 1976. The over-all perforation rate, 30.4 per 1,000 procedures, is three to 30 times that commonly reported for dilatation and suction or sharp curettage (D&C) of the uterus. Case women were 10.4 times more likely than control women to combine two of the following three characteristics: age greater than 34, parity greater than 4, and obesity greater than 20 per cent above the ideal body weight for height. Surgeons with fewer months of formal Ob/Gyn training were no more likely than their relatively more experienced colleagues to perforate the uterus. No other risk factors were delineated. It is believed that the perforation rate, higher in this study than in earlier ones, reflects better ascertainment of perforations. The bleeding site was always visualized with the laparoscope in this series.

Published
1977
Full Text
View/download PDF

42. Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States. The Collaborative Review of Sterilization.

Author

Dicker RC, Greenspan JR, Strauss LT, Cowart MR, Scally MJ, Peterson HB, DeStefano F, Rubin GL, and Ory HW

Subjects
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Female, Humans, Prospective Studies, Risk, Hysterectomy adverse effects, Hysterectomy, Vaginal adverse effects, Postoperative Complications
Abstract

Although hysterectomy was the most frequently performed major surgical procedure among women of reproductive age during the past decade, few recent studies have been conducted to determine the risk of complications. We examined data from the Collaborative Review of Sterilization, a prospective, multicenter, observational study coordinated by the Centers for Disease Control, to assess the comparative risks of complications among women undergoing hysterectomy by the abdominal and vaginal approaches. Between September, 1978, and August, 1981, 1,851 women from nine institutions were included in the study. Women who underwent vaginal hysterectomy experienced significantly fewer complications than women who had undergone abdominal hysterectomy. The difference was probably attributable to the prevalence and efficacy of prophylactic antibiotic use among the former group. Vaginal hysterectomy was associated with more unintended major surgical procedures but less febrile morbidity, bleeding requiring transfusion, hospitalization, and convalescence than abdominal hysterectomy. Vaginal hysterectomy with prophylactic antibiotics should be strongly considered for those women of reproductive age for whom either surgical approach is clinically appropriate.

Published
1982
Full Text
View/download PDF

43. Relation of type 2 Herpesvirus antibodies to cervical neoplasia. Barbados, West Indies, 1971.

Author

Ory H, Conger B, Richart R, and Barron B

Subjects
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Blood Specimen Collection, Complement Fixation Tests, Female, Herpes Simplex diagnosis, Herpes Simplex immunology, Herpes Simplex microbiology, Humans, Middle Aged, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms diagnosis, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms epidemiology, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms etiology, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms immunology, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms microbiology, West Indies, Antibodies, Viral isolation & purification, Simplexvirus immunology, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms complications
Published
1974

44. Ectopic pregnancy and intrauterine contraceptive devices: new perspectives. The Women's Health Study.

Author

Ory HW

Subjects
Adolescent, Adult, Contraception methods, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Risk, Time Factors, Intrauterine Devices adverse effects, Pregnancy, Ectopic etiology
Abstract

In the period 1965 through 1977 the number of ectopic pregnancies in the United States tripled. A collaborative multicenter case-control study was set up to examine ectopic pregnancy as well as several other suspected complications related to use of an intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD). To determine to what extent IUD use might be related to this increase, the authors analyzed 615 women who had had an ectopic pregnancy and 3453 controls. Most important, women who had never used an IUD were equally likely to have an ectopic pregnancy as women who had used an IUD. Looking at the comparative risks for current contraceptive users, all current users, including IUD users, were less likely to have had an ectopic pregnancy than women not currently using contraceptives. Likelihood of ectopic pregnancy was the same regardless of whether a copper-containing or an inert plastic IUD was used. Among current IUD users, those who had used an IUD for a long time (25 months or more) were 2.6 times as likely to have had an ectopic pregnancy as short-term (less than 25 months) users. This difference between long- and short-term IUD users persisted for some time (not longer than 1 year) after removal of the IUD. Use of the IUD probably did not play a role in the recent tripling of ectopic pregnancies in the United States.

Published
1981

45. Endometrial cancer: how does cigarette smoking influence the risk of women under age 55 years having this tumor?

Author

Tyler CW Jr, Webster LA, Ory HW, and Rubin GL

Subjects
Adult, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Middle Aged, Random Allocation, Risk, Smoking, Uterine Neoplasms etiology
Abstract

This analysis of the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study, a multicenter, population-based case control investigation of hormone use by women of reproductive age and endometrial, breast, and ovarian cancer shows that cigarette smoking is not associated with either an increased or a decreased risk of endometrial cancer. This study included 437 women with endometrial cancer and 3200 control subjects, all of whom were between the ages of 20 and 54 years at the time of interview. The absence of any alteration of the risk of endometrial cancer and smoking was found consistently no matter which variable was used as a measure of smoking--ever or never smoked cigarettes, former or current smoking, light or heavy smoking, or age smoking began.

Published
1985
Full Text
View/download PDF

46. Deaths associated with laparoscopic sterilization in the United States, 1977-79.

Author

Peterson HB, Greenspan JR, DeStefano F, and Ory HW

Subjects
Female, Humans, Laparotomy mortality, United States, Sterilization, Tubal mortality
Abstract

In 1979, the Centers for Disease Control began epidemiologic surveillance of deaths associated with tubal sterilization as part of an effort to assess the mortality risks associated with different methods of fertility control. The surveillance system identified nine deaths following laparoscopic sterilization in the United States from 1977 through 1979. The causes of these deaths and how some of them might have been averted are discussed.

Published
1982

47. The pill at 20: an assessment.

Author

Ory HW, Rosenfield A, and Landman LC

Subjects
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Cardiovascular Diseases chemically induced, Child, Female, Fertility drug effects, Humans, Neoplasms chemically induced, Prospective Studies, Risk, Smoking, Contraceptives, Oral adverse effects
Published
1980

48. Deaths associated with laparoscopic sterilization by unipolar electrocoagulating devices, 1978 and 1979.

Author

Peterson HB, Ory HW, Greenspan JR, and Tyler CW Jr

Subjects
Adult, Burns, Electric etiology, Burns, Electric mortality, Electrocoagulation methods, Female, Humans, Peritonitis etiology, Sterilization, Tubal methods, United States, Colon injuries, Electrocoagulation mortality, Laparoscopy mortality, Sterilization, Tubal mortality
Abstract

In 1978 and 1979, two women in the United States were reported to have died from electrical complications following sterilization with unipolar coagulating devices. Both deaths followed apparent bowel injuries occurring at the time of sterilization. Numerous reports have documented the electrical accidents associated with unipolar electrocoagulation. Because unipolar electrocoagulation has greater risk for these complications than alternative sterilization techniques, without proved greater benefits, we question the need for continuing its use in female sterilization.

Published
1981
Full Text
View/download PDF

49. Menstrual changes after tubal sterilization.

Author

DeStefano F, Huezo CM, Peterson HB, Rubin GL, Layde PM, and Ory HW

Subjects
Adolescent, Adult, Electrocoagulation, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Menstruation Disturbances physiopathology, Prospective Studies, Sterilization, Tubal methods, Surveys and Questionnaires, Menstruation, Menstruation Disturbances etiology, Sterilization, Tubal adverse effects
Abstract

The authors used data from a multicenter prospective study of female sterilization surgery to study changes in menstrual function following tubal sterilization. Duration of menstrual bleeding, menstrual cycle length, cycle regularity, amount of menstrual bleeding, menstrual pain, and intermenstrual bleeding were examined. The authors followed 2456 women for two years after tubal sterilization surgery. Each woman served as her own control; her menstrual function at the two-year follow-up interview was compared with her menstrual function at the preoperative interview. Except for menstrual pain among women who underwent unipolar electrocoagulation procedures, there was no increase in the prevalence of adverse menstrual function after tubal sterilization. For all menstrual variables, 50% or more of women with adverse function preoperatively had an improvement by two years after tubal sterilization.

Published
1983

50. Contraceptive choice and prevalence of cervical dysplasia and carcinoma in situ.

Author

Ory H, Naib Z, Conger SB, Hatcher RA, and Tyler CW Jr

Subjects
Adolescent, Adult, Choice Behavior, Female, Georgia, Humans, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Carcinoma in Situ epidemiology, Contraception Behavior, Contraceptives, Oral, Intrauterine Devices, Precancerous Conditions epidemiology
Abstract

Whether use of oral contraceptives is associated with subsequent development of cervical neoplasia is an important public health question. Before evaluating this issue, we must determine if choosing oral contraceptives identifies a woman who is intrinsically at high risk of developing cervical neoplasia. We have examined the demographic and reproductive characteristics as well as cervical premalignant changes manifest by 15- to 44-year-old black women who enrolled in a public family-planning clinic. When compared to IUD acceptors, oral contraceptive acceptors did not have a disproportionately large number of women with traits which predicted for high risk of developing cervical neoplasia. Oral contraceptive acceptors, compared to IUD acceptors, did not have a higher prevalence rate of carcinoma in situ. Oral contraceptive acceptors with no Pap smears prior to initial choice of contraceptive method did have a 1.4-fold higher prevalence rate of cervical dysplasia than IUD acceptors. These results suggest that the deicision to use oral contraceptives, per se, does not identify a group of women at higher risk to develop cervical carcinoma in situ. Such a decision may, however, identify a group with a small increased propensity for developing cervical dysplasia.

Published
1976
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results