Search

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated racial disparities in opioid prescribing in emergency departments and after surgical procedures. Orthopaedic surgeons account for a large proportion of dispensed opioid prescriptions, yet there are few data investigating whether racial or ethnic disparities exist in opioid dispensing after orthopaedic procedures. Questions/purposes: (1) Are Black, Hispanic or Latino, or Asian or Pacific Islander (PI) patients less likely than non-Hispanic White patients to receive an opioid prescription after an orthopaedic procedure in an academic United States health system? (2) Of the patients who do receive a postoperative opioid prescription, do Black, Hispanic or Latino, or Asian or PI patients receive a lower analgesic dose than non-Hispanic White patients when analyzed by type of procedure performed? Methods: Between January 2017 and March 2021, 60,782 patients underwent an orthopaedic surgical procedure at one of the six Penn Medicine healthcare system hospitals. Of these patients, we considered patients who had not been prescribed an opioid within 1 year eligible for the study, resulting in 61% (36,854) of patients. A total of 40% (24,106) of patients were excluded because they did not undergo one of the top eight most-common orthopaedic procedures studied or their procedure was not performed by a Penn Medicine faculty member. Missing data consisted of 382 patients who had no race or ethnicity listed in their record or declined to provide a race or ethnicity; these patients were excluded. This left 12,366 patients for analysis. Sixty-five percent (8076) of patients identified as non-Hispanic White, 27% (3289) identified as Black, 3% (372) identified as Hispanic or Latino, 3% (318) identified as Asian or PI, and 3% (311) identified as another race ("other"). Prescription dosages were converted to total morphine milligram equivalents for analysis. Statistical differences in receipt of a postoperative opioid prescription were assessed with multivariate logistic regression models within procedure, adjusted for age, gender, and type of healthcare insurance. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to assess for differences in the total morphine milligram equivalent dosage of the prescription, stratified by procedure. Results: Almost all patients (95% [11,770 of 12,366]) received an opioid prescription. After risk adjustment, we found no differences in the odds of Black (odds ratio 0.94 [95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.15]; p = 0.68), Hispanic or Latino (OR 0.75 [95% CI 0.47 to 1.20]; p = 0.18), Asian or PI (OR 1.00 [95% CI 0.58 to 1.74]; p = 0.96), or other-race patients (OR 1.33 [95% CI 0.72 to 2.47]; p = 0.26) receiving a postoperative opioid prescription compared with non-Hispanic White patients. There were no race or ethnicity differences in the median morphine milligram equivalent dose of postoperative opioid analgesics prescribed (p > 0.1 for all eight procedures) based on procedure. Conclusion: In this academic health system, we did not find any differences in opioid prescribing after common orthopaedic procedures by patient race or ethnicity. A potential explanation is the use of surgical pathways in our orthopaedic department. Formal standardized opioid prescribing guidelines may reduce variability in opioid prescribing. Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Plant‐associated soil microbes are important mediators of plant defence responses to diverse above‐ground pathogen and insect challengers. For example, closely related strains of beneficial rhizosphere Pseudomonas spp. can induce systemic resistance (ISR), systemic susceptibility (ISS) or neither against the bacterial foliar pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pto DC3000). Using a model system composed of root‐associated Pseudomonas spp. strains, the foliar pathogen Pto DC3000 and the herbivore Trichoplusia ni (cabbage looper), we found that rhizosphere‐associated Pseudomonas spp. that induce either ISS and ISR against Pto DC3000 all increased resistance to herbivory by T. ni. We found that resistance to T. ni and resistance to Pto DC3000 are quantitative metrics of the jasmonic acid (JA)/salicylic acid (SA) trade‐off and distinct strains of rhizosphere‐associated Pseudomonas spp. have distinct effects on the JA/SA trade‐off. Using genetic analysis and transcriptional profiling, we provide evidence that treatment of Arabidopsis with Pseudomonas sp. CH267, which induces ISS against bacterial pathogens, tips the JA/SA trade‐off towards JA‐dependent defences against herbivores at the cost of a subset of SA‐mediated defences against bacterial pathogens. In contrast, treatment of Arabidopsis with the ISR strain Pseudomonas sp. WCS417 disrupts JA/SA antagonism and simultaneously primes plants for both JA‐ and SA‐mediated defences. Our findings show that ISS against the bacterial foliar pathogens triggered by Pseudomonas sp. CH267, which is a seemingly deleterious phenotype, may in fact be an adaptive consequence of increased resistance to herbivory. Our work shows that pleiotropic effects of microbiome modulation of plant defences are important to consider when using microbes to modify plant traits in agriculture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The role of elective rotations in the orthopaedic residency selection process varies between programs. Our study aims to identify factors associated with residency programs that interview and match a greater proportion of applicants who have completed an elective rotation with their program., Methods: Data were collected through the American Orthopaedic Association's Orthopaedic Residency Information Network database. Bivariate correlations and multivariate regression models were used to identify independent predictors of programs with a greater proportion of interviewees or residents who completed an elective rotation at the respective program., Results: One hundred seventy-eight of the 218 existing residency programs were included in this study. Programs that offered fewer interviews and more away rotation positions per year were associated with a greater odds of its interviewees (OR = 0.36, p = 0.01; OR = 4.55, p < 0.001, respectively) and residents (OR = 0.44, p = 0.04; OR = 4.23, p < 0.001, respectively) having completed an elective rotation with the program. In addition, programs with fewer attendings (OR = 0.39, p = 0.03) and in-person interviews (OR = 3.04, p = 0.04) matched a greater proportion of their rotators. However, programs that interviewed applicants during the elective rotation were less likely to match their rotators (OR = 0.35, p = 0.04)., Conclusion: Certain program characteristics independently predict the likelihood of a program interviewing and matching their rotators. These findings may provide information for applicants and programs regarding the rotation process., Level of Evidence: III., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSOA/A624)., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved.)

Background: Readmission rate after surgery is an important outcome measure in revealing disparities. This study aimed to examine how 30-day readmission rates and causes of readmission differ by race and specific injury areas within orthopaedic surgery., Methods: The American College of Surgeon-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for orthopaedic procedures from 2015 to 2019. Patients were stratified by self-reported race. Procedures were stratified using current procedural terminology codes corresponding to given injury areas. Multiple logistic regression was done to evaluate associations between race and all-cause readmission risk, and risk of readmission due to specific causes., Results: Of 780,043 orthopaedic patients, the overall 30-day readmission rate was 4.18%. Black and Asian patients were at greater (OR = 1.18, P < 0.01) and lesser (OR = 0.76, P < 0.01) risk for readmission than White patients, respectively. Black patients were more likely to be readmitted for deep surgical site infection (OR = 1.25, P = 0.03), PE (OR = 1.64, P < 0.01), or wound disruption (OR = 1.45, P < 0.01). For all races, all-cause readmission was highest after spine procedures and lowest after hand/wrist procedures., Conclusions: Black patients were at greater risk for overall, spine, shoulder/elbow, hand/wrist, and hip/knee all-cause readmission. Asian patients were at lower risk for overall, spine, hand/wrist, and hip/knee surgery all-cause readmission. Our findings can identify complications that should be more carefully monitored in certain patient populations., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)