Search

Background: Gastric sensorimotor disorders are prevalent. While gastric emptying measurements are commonly used, they may not fully capture the underlying pathophysiology. Body surface gastric mapping (BSGM) recently emerged to assess gastric sensorimotor dysfunction. This study assessed varying meal size on BSGM responses to inform test use in a wider variety of contexts. Methods: Data from multiple healthy cohorts receiving BSGM were pooled, using four different test meals. A standard BSGM protocol was employed: 30‐min fasting, 4‐h post‐prandial, using Gastric Alimetry® (Alimetry, New Zealand). Meals comprised: (i) nutrient drink + oatmeal bar (482 kcal; 'standard meal'); (ii) oatmeal bar alone; egg and toast meal, and pancake (all ~250 kcal). Gastric Alimetry metrics included BMI‐adjusted Amplitude, Principal Gastric Frequency, Gastric Alimetry Rhythm Index (GA‐RI) and Fed:Fasted Amplitude Ratio (ff‐AR). Key Results: 238 participants (59.2% female) were included. All meals significantly increased amplitude and frequency during the first postprandial hour (p < 0.05). There were no differences in postprandial frequency across meals (p > 0.05). The amplitude and GA‐RI of the standard meal (n = 110) were significantly higher than the energy bar alone (n = 45) and egg meal (n = 65) (all p < 0.05). All BSGM metrics were comparable across the three smaller meals (p > 0.05). A higher symptom burden was found in the oatmeal bar group versus the standard meal and pancake meal (p = 0.01, 0.003, respectively). Conclusions & Inferences: The consumption of lower calorie meals elicited different postprandial responses, when compared to the standard Gastric Alimetry meal. These data will guide interpretations of BSGM when applied with lower calorie meals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: There is currently a lack of validated questionnaires designed specifically to assess mental health within patients with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms. This research describes the multi-phase process used to develop and validate a novel mental health scale for patients with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms, the Alimetry® Gut-Brain Wellbeing (AGBW) Survey. Methods: A patient-centered multi-phase process was implemented. In Phase 1, the most relevant concepts for this patient population were selected from existing mental health scales, using data from 79 patients. In Phase 2, an interdisciplinary panel of experts generated scale items. In Phase 3, the scale underwent pre-testing with gastroenterologists (n = 9), health psychologists (n = 3), and patients (n = 12), with feedback incorporated over multiple rounds. Lastly, the psychometric properties of the scale were assessed in a sample of 311 patients via an online survey. Results: The AGBW Survey comprises a patient preface, 10 close-ended questions, and an optional open-ended question. This multidimensional scale assesses general mental health, alongside specific subscales relating to depression, stress, and anxiety. The subscale and total scores demonstrated high internal consistency (α = 0.91 for the total scale; α = 0.72-0.86 for subscales) and good convergent, divergent, concurrent validity, and known groups validity, with large effect sizes. Conclusion: The AGBW Survey is a brief, valid, and reliable scale for assessing mental health in patients with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms. It can be used as a tool to complement physiological tests and has the potential to guide psychological referrals, inform multidisciplinary management, and evaluate treatment outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic gastroduodenal symptoms disproportionately affect females of childbearing age; however, the effect of menstrual cycling on gastric electrophysiology is poorly defined. To establish the effect of the menstrual cycle on gastric electrophysiology, healthy subjects underwent noninvasive Body Surface Gastric Mapping (BSGM; 8x8 array) with the validated symptom logging App (Gastric Alimetry, New Zealand). Participants included were premenopausal females in follicular (n = 26) and luteal phases (n = 18) and postmenopausal females (n = 30) and males (n = 51) were controls. Principal gastric frequency (PGF), body mass index (BMI) adjusted amplitude, Gastric Alimetry Rhythm Index (GA-RI), Fed:Fasted Amplitude Ratio (ff-AR), meal response curves, and symptom burden were analyzed. Menstrual cycle-related electrophysiological changes were then transferred to an established anatomically accurate computational gastric fluid dynamics model (meal viscosity 0.1 Pas) to predict the impact on gastric mixing and emptying. PGF was significantly higher in the luteal versus follicular phase [mean 3.21 cpm, SD (0.17) vs. 2.94 cpm, SD (0.17), P < 0.001] and versus males [3.01 cpm, SD (0.2), P < 0.001]. In the computational model, this translated to 8.1% higher gastric mixing strength and 5.3% faster gastric emptying for luteal versus follicular phases. Postmenopausal females also exhibited higher PGF than females in the follicular phase [3.10 cpm, SD (0.24) vs. 2.94 cpm, SD (0.17), P = 0.01], and higher BMI-adjusted amplitude [40.7 µV (33.02–52.58) vs. 29.6 µV (26.15–39.65), P < 0.001], GA-RI [0.60 (0.48–0.73) vs. 0.43 (0.30–0.60), P = 0.005], and ff-AR [2.51 (1.79–3.47) vs. 1.48 (1.21–2.17), P = 0.001] than males. There were no differences in symptoms. These results define variations in gastric electrophysiology with regard to human menstrual cycling and menopause. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: This study evaluates gastric electrophysiology in relation to the menstrual cycle using a novel noninvasive high-resolution methodology, revealing substantial variations in gastric activity with menstrual cycling and menopause. Gastric slow-wave frequency is significantly higher in the luteal versus follicular menstrual phase. Computational modeling predicts that this difference translates to higher rates of gastric mixing and liquid emptying in the luteal phase, which is consistent with previous experimental data evaluating menstrual cycling effects on gastric emptying. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) is common and is associated with a significant healthcare burden. Previous studies have attempted to predict PPOI clinically using risk prediction algorithms. The aim of this work was to systematically review and compare risk prediction algorithms for PPOI following colorectal surgery. Method: A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL Plus. Studies that developed and/or validated a risk prediction algorithm for PPOI in adults following colorectal surgery were included. Data were collected on study design, population and operative characteristics, the definition of PPOI used and risk prediction algorithm design and performance. Quality appraisal was assessed using the PROBAST tool. Results: Eleven studies with 87 549 participants were included in our review. Most were retrospective, single‐centre analyses (6/11, 55%) and rates of PPOI varied from 10% to 28%. The most commonly used variables were sex (8/11, 73%), age (6/11, 55%) and surgical approach (5/11, 45%). Area under the curve ranged from 0.68–0.78, and only three models were validated. However, there was significant variation in the definition of PPOI used. No study reported sensitivity, specificity or positive/negative predictive values. Conclusion: Currently available risk prediction algorithms for PPOI appear to discriminate moderately well, although there is a lack of validation data. Future studies should aim to use a standardized definition of PPOI, comprehensively report model performance and validate their findings using internal and external methodologies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Biopsychosocial factors are associated with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) and exacerbate gastrointestinal symptoms. The mechanisms underlying pathophysiological alterations of stress remain unclear. Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) is a central regulator of the hormonal stress response and has diverse impact on different organ systems. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of peripheral CRH infusion on meal-related gastrointestinal symptoms, gastric electrical activity, and gastric sensorimotor function in healthy volunteers (HVs). In a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study, we evaluated the effects of CRH on gastric motility and sensitivity. HVs were randomized to receive either peripheral-administered CRH (100 µg bolus + 1 µg/kg/h) or placebo (saline), followed by at least a 7-day washout period and assignment to the opposite treatment. Tests encompassed saliva samples, gastric-emptying (GE) testing, body surface gastric mapping (BSGM, Gastric Alimetry; Alimetry) to assess gastric myoelectrical activity with real-time symptom profiling, and a gastric barostat study to assess gastric sensitivity to distention and accommodation. Twenty HVs [13 women, mean age 29.2 ± 5.3 yr, body mass index (BMI) 23.3 ± 3.8 kg/m2] completed GE tests, of which 18 also underwent BSGM measurements during the GE tests. The GE half-time decreased significantly after CRH exposure (65.2 ± 17.4 vs. 78.8 ± 24.5 min, P = 0.02) with significantly increased gastric amplitude [49.7 (34.7–55.6) vs. 31.7 (25.7–51.0) µV, P < 0.01], saliva cortisol levels, and postprandial symptom severity. Eleven HVs also underwent gastric barostat studies on a separate day. However, the thresholds for discomfort during isobaric distensions, gastric compliance, and accommodation did not differ between CRH and placebo. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: In healthy volunteers, peripheral corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) infusion accelerates gastric-emptying rate and increases postprandial gastric response, accompanied by a rise in symptoms, but does not alter gastric sensitivity or meal-induced accommodation. These findings underscore a significant link between stress and dyspeptic symptoms, with CRH playing a pivotal role in mediating these effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Faecal incontinence is common and of multifactorial aetiologies, yet current diagnostic tools are unable to assess nerve and sphincter function objectively. We developed an anorectal high‐density electromyography (HD‐EMG) probe to evaluate motor‐evoked potentials induced via trans‐sacral magnetic stimulation (TSMS). Method: Anorectal probes with an 8 × 8 array of electrodes spaced 1 cm apart were developed for recording HD‐EMG of the external anal sphincter. These HD‐EMG probes were used to map MEP amplitudes and latencies evoked via TSMS delivered through the Magstim Rapid2 (MagStim Company). Patients undergoing pelvic floor investigations were recruited for this IDEAL Stage 2a pilot study. Results: Eight participants (median age 49 years; five female) were recruited. Methodological viability, safety and diagnostic workflow were established. The test was well tolerated with median discomfort scores ≤2.5/10, median pain scores ≤1/10 and no adverse events. Higher Faecal Incontinence Severity Index scores correlated with longer MEP latencies (r = 0.58, p < 0.001) and lower MEP amplitudes (r = −0.32, p = 0.046), as did St. Mark's Incontinence Scores with both MEP latencies (r = 0.49, p = 0.001) and MEP amplitudes (r = −0.47, p = 0.002). Conclusion: This HD‐EMG probe in conjunction with TSMS presents a novel diagnostic tool for anorectal function assessment. Spatiotemporal assessment of magnetically stimulated MEPs correlated well with symptoms and offers a feasible, safe and patient‐tolerable method of evaluating pudendal nerve and external anal sphincter function. Further clinical development and evaluation of these techniques is justified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic gastroduodenal symptoms are prevalent worldwide, and there is a need for new diagnostic and treatment approaches. Several overlapping processes may contribute to these symptoms, including gastric dysmotility, hypersensitivity, gut–brain axis disorders, gastric outflow resistance, and duodenal inflammation. Gastric Alimetry® (Alimetry, New Zealand) is a non-invasive test for evaluating gastric function that combines body surface gastric mapping (high-resolution electrophysiology) with validated symptom profiling. Together, these complementary data streams enable important new clinical insights into gastric disorders and their symptom correlations, with emerging therapeutic implications. A comprehensive database has been established, currently comprising > 2000 Gastric Alimetry tests, including both controls and patients with various gastroduodenal disorders. From studies employing this database, this paper presents a systematic methodology for Gastric Alimetry test interpretation, together with an extensive supporting literature review. Reporting is grouped into four sections: Test Quality, Spectral Analysis, Symptoms, and Conclusions. This review compiles, assesses, and evaluates each of these aspects of test assessment, with discussion of relevant evidence, example cases, limitations, and areas for future work. The resultant interpretation methodology is recommended for use in clinical practice and research to assist clinicians in their use of Gastric Alimetry as a diagnostic aid and is expected to continue to evolve with further development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]