Search

Allison P Pack,1 Mary Clare Masters,2 Rachel O’Conor,1 Kenya Alcantara,1 Sophia Svoboda,1 Reneaki Smith,1 Fangyu Yeh,1 Guisselle Wismer,1 Amisha Wallia,2,3 Stacy C Bailey1 1Division of General Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA; 2Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA; 3Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USACorrespondence: Allison P Pack, Division of General Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA, Email allison.pack@northwestern.eduBackground: People living with HIV (PLWH) are at higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Both chronic conditions require individuals to adhere to medication regimens, yet few studies have sought to explore medication-taking behaviors among individuals with comorbid HIV and T2DM (HIV+T2DM).Objective: This qualitative study sought to: 1) identify and compare perceived determinants of medication adherence for HIV and, separately, for T2DM, and 2) explore how participants prioritize conditions.Methods: Between October 2022 and January 2023, we conducted in-depth interviews with individuals aged 50 or older, living with comorbid HIV+T2DM. Participants were prescribed oral medications to treat their conditions and had recent clinical measures indicating probable challenges with medication adherence. Interviews with consented participants from a large academic health center in the Midwest were conducted remotely. Questions largely drew from the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), a widely used implementation science framework. Additional questions explored the prioritization of conditions. Analysis employed the Framework Method and a side-by-side comparison of key determinants of medication adherence by condition.Results: A total of 19 interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed. Participants were an average age of 61, mostly male (89.5%), and Non-Hispanic White (47.4%). Although results revealed many commonalities between perceived determinants of medication adherence for HIV and for T2DM, differences relating to two TDF domains were noted: nature of the behavior (taking medications as prescribed), and motivations and goals. Many participants viewed their conditions as equally important, though they suggested T2DM was more difficult to manage, largely due to lifestyle modifications.Conclusion: As individuals with HIV develop chronic conditions, such as T2DM, they may require additional medication adherence support. Attention should be paid to offering support early. Disease perceptions may differ by condition, and as such, one’s motivations to take medication as prescribed may also differ by condition.Keywords: qualitative, HIV, type 2 diabetes, medication adherence

Sophia W Light,1 Allison Pack,1 Alyssa Vela,2 Stacy C Bailey,1 Andrea Zuleta,1 Rachel O’Conor,1 Michael S Wolf1 1Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; 2Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USACorrespondence: Sophia W Light, Center for Applied Health Research on Aging (CAHRA), Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 750 N. Lake Shore Drive, 10th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA, Tel +1(312)503-5015, Email sophia.wl@northwestern.eduPurpose: Historically marginalized communities disproportionately impacted by the pandemic are demonstrating lower uptake of COVID-19 vaccines. To facilitate the development of culturally tailored, language concordant educational materials promoting COVID-19 vaccination, we first explored older Latinx adults’ awareness, attitudes, and beliefs about COVID-19 vaccines and factors involved in vaccination decisions within their communities.Patients and Methods: Individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 participants who self-identified as Latinx/Hispanic, aged 50 and older, and living in Chicago. Eight interviews were conducted in English and seven in Spanish. Thematic analysis was used to analyze participants’ responses.Results: Participants revealed four key factors influencing vaccination decisions: 1. protecting oneself and loved ones (against COVID-19 (n=14), or from perceived dangers of the vaccine (n=9)); 2. trust in authorities (trusting information (n=9), or worrying the vaccine is being manipulated (n=5)); 3. access and availability (gratitude to live in a country where vaccines are available (n=5), or fear of going to vaccination sites due to immigration and insurance status (n=4)); and 4. Employment and semblance of normalcy (vaccination to create opportunities (n=6), or concern about missing out due to side effects (n=9)).Conclusion: Our findings illuminate key factors influencing decisions for COVID-19 vaccination among Latinx older adults in Chicago. Vaccination information aiming to increase vaccination rates among this important population may benefit from leveraging collective pronouns and spirituality, language concordance, low-tech options, building trust, and addressing insurance and immigration doubts. Next steps include developing educational materials based on these themes, followed by dissemination and evaluation. Lessons learned may be of interest to public health experts responding to the ongoing pandemic and other public health crises experienced by historically marginalized communities.Keywords: qualitative, COVID-19 vaccines, COVID-19, Latinx, older adult

Alex D Federman,1 Rachel O’Conor,2 Michael S Wolf,2 Juan P Wisnivesky1 1Division of General Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; 2Division of General Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USACorrespondence: Alex D FedermanDivision of General Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USATel +1 212 824-7565Fax +1 212 824-2317Email alex.federman@mssm.eduIntroduction: Medication adherence is often low among people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and medication regimen complexity may be a contributing factor. In this study, we sought to examine the role of medication regimen complexity in COPD medication adherence among patients with multimorbidity.Methods: We performed cross-sectional analysis of data on COPD patients in primary care and pulmonary practices in New York City and Chicago (n=400). Regimen complexity was represented by the medication regimen complexity index (MRCI) and simple medication count. Adherence was measured by self-report and inhaler dose counts. Disease control measures included the COPD severity score (COPDSS) and the Medical Research Council (MRC) severity index.Results: Mean age of study participants was 69 years, 66% had MRC grades 4 or 5, and 45% had low medication adherence. MRCI scores did not differ significantly between those with and without adequate medication adherence. Patients with higher MRCI scores were more likely to have severe COPD (OR 5.00, 95% CI 1.46– 17.1, p=0.01) and dyspnea grades 3 or 4 (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.03– 5.03, p=0.04). Significant associations of medication count with COPD severity were also observed.Discussion: These findings demonstrate that among patients with COPD and comorbid hypertension and diabetes, higher medication regimen complexity is associated with worse COPD control but not with COPD medication adherence.Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, multimorbidity, medication regimen complexity, medication adherence

Objective: Previous studies have demonstrated the effect of incontinence, and urge incontinence in particular, on patients' quality of life. This study assessed the effects of urge incontinence on quality of life and measured the value of a reduction in symptoms.Design: A self-administered questionnaire was mailed to 591 patients with urge or mixed incontinence. 495 (83.8%) surveys were returned with complete quality of life and symptom data. Of the total sample, 411 patients received the willingness-to-pay (WTP) survey, from which 257 (62.53%) returns were judged complete and reliable. Information was collected about the number of micturitions and urinary leakages. Health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) was measured using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey. Socioeconomic characteristics were also recorded. Value was assessed with a binary WTP question.Main Outcome Measures and Results: Quality of life among the sample population was significantly lower in 5 of 8 dimensions compared with the general US population, and was significantly related to the severity of the symptoms in 6 of 8 dimensions. The median (mean) willingness to pay was $US27.24 ($US87.74) per month for a 25% reduction in micturitions and leakages, and $US75.92 ($US244.54) per month for a 50% reduction in micturitions and leakages. As expected, the willingness to pay was significantly related to the size of the reduction in micturitions and leakages, and household income.Conclusions: Patients with incontinence perceive substantial benefits from a reduction in the number of micturitions and leakages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Presents a letter to the editor in response to an article about incidence of keratoconus in Asian populations.

We compare different contingent valuation question formats with eachother and with observed behaviour for a non-monetary estimation task, the expected number of kilometers traveled by automobile. Open-ended questions, open-ended follow-up questions, dichotomous choice (DC) questions, and double-bound DC questions are included. The single anddouble-bound DC questions result in an estimated mean about twice ashigh as the actual value and the open-ended mean. The DC question overestimation seems to be due to an anchoring effect leading to 'yea-saying' behaviour. Our results about the difference between DC questions and open-ended questions is consistent with the pattern observed in contingent valuations studies of the willingness to pay. Our results indicates that DC questions seem to be associated with a general overestimation problem that is present even for simple non-monetary estimation tasks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study introduces a hybrid, two-stage, contingent valuation method applied to asthma treatment. Respondents are initially offered a choice between hypothetical medications, implying a tradeoff between safety and efficacy. Stage two elicits willingness to pay (WTP) for an improvement along a single risk dimension. Estimates of the value of asthma control based on the initial risk tradeoff stage range from approximately US$1400 to US$2100 per year, assuming a US $6 million value of life. Analysis of the second-stage WTP responses yield estimates for the value of a statistical life of approximately US$9 million and for asthma control of approximately US$2200 per year. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Older adults with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) and polypharmacy often face challenges with medication adherence. Nonadherence can lead to suboptimal treatment outcomes, adverse drug events, and poor quality of life., Objective: To facilitate medication adherence among older adults with MCC and polypharmacy in primary care, we are adapting a technology-enabled intervention previously implemented in a specialty clinic. The objective of this study was to obtain multilevel feedback to inform the adaptation of the proposed intervention (Phenotyping Adherence Through Technology-Enabled Reports and Navigation [PATTERN])., Methods: We conducted a formative qualitative study among patients, clinicians, and clinic administrators affiliated with a large academic health center in Chicago, Illinois. Patient eligibility included being aged 65 years or older, living with MCC, and contending with polypharmacy. Eligibility criteria for clinicians and administrators included being employed by any primary care clinic affiliated with the participating health center. Individual semistructured interviews were conducted remotely by a trained member of the study team using interview guides informed by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment Framework. Thematic analysis of interview audio recordings drew from the Rapid Identification of Themes from Audio Recordings procedures., Results: In total, we conducted 25 interviews, including 12 with clinicians and administrators, and 13 with patients. Thematic analysis revealed participants largely found the idea of technology-based medication adherence monitoring to be acceptable and appropriate for the target population in primary care, although several concerns were raised; we discuss these in detail., Conclusions: Our medication adherence monitoring intervention, adapted from specialty care, will be implemented in primary care. Formative interviews, informed by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment Framework and conducted among patients, clinicians, and administrators, have identified intervention adaptation needs. Results from this study could inform other interventions using the patient portal with older adults., (©Allison P Pack, Stacy C Bailey, Rachel O'Conor, Evelyn Velazquez, Guisselle Wismer, Fangyu Yeh, Laura M Curtis, Kenya Alcantara, Michael S Wolf. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 17.10.2024.)

Background: With changing cognitive abilities, individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia face challenges in successfully managing multidrug regimens. We sought to understand how individuals with MCI or dementia and their family caregivers manage multidrug regimens and better understand patient-to-caregiver transitions in medication management responsibilities., Methods: We conducted qualitative interviews among patient-caregiver dyads. Eligibility included: patients with a diagnosis of MCI, mild or moderate dementia, managing ≥3 chronic conditions, ≥5 prescription medications, who also had a family caregiver ≥18 years old. Semi-structured interview guides, informed by the Medication Self-Management model, ascertained roles and responsibilities for medication management and patient-to-caregiver transitions in medication responsibilities., Results: We interviewed 32 patient-caregiver dyads. Older adults and caregivers favored older adult autonomy in medication management, and individuals with MCI and mild dementia largely managed their medications independently using multiple strategies (e.g., establishing daily routines, using pillboxes). Among individuals with moderate dementia, caregivers assumed all medication-related responsibilities except when living separately. In those scenarios, caregivers set up organizers and made reminder calls, but did not observe family members taking medications. Patient-to-caregiver transitions in medication responsibilities frequently occurred after caregivers observed older adults making errors with medications. As caregivers sought to assume greater responsibilities with family members' medicines, they faced multiple barriers. Most barriers were dyadic; they affected both the older adult and the caregiver and/or the relationship. Some barriers were specific to caregivers; these included caregivers' competing responsibilities or inaccurate perceptions of dementia, while other barriers were related to the healthcare system., Conclusions: To ease medication management transitions, balance must be sought between preservation of older adult autonomy and early family caregiver involvement. Clinicians should work to initiate conversations with family caregivers and individuals living with MCI or dementia about transitioning medication responsibilities as memory loss progresses, simplify regimens, and deprescribe, as appropriate., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of the American Geriatrics Society published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Geriatrics Society.)

Background: Older adults with HIV are at increased risk of developing certain chronic health conditions including type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). As the number and complexity of conditions increases, so do treatment and health care needs. We explored patient and clinician preferences for HIV+T2DM care and perceived solutions to improving care., Methods: We conducted an exploratory qualitative study comprised of individual in-depth interviews. Participants included English-speaking patients aged 50 and older living with HIV and T2DM and infectious disease (ID) and primary care (PC) clinicians from a large academic health center in Chicago. Thematic analysis drew from the Framework Method., Results: A total of 19 patient and 10 clinician participants were interviewed. Many patients reported seeking HIV and T2DM care from the same clinician; they valued rapport and a 'one-stop-shop'. Others reported having separate clinicians; they valued perceived expertise and specialty care. Nearly all clinicians reported comfort screening for T2DM and initiating first line oral therapy; ID clinicians reported placing referrals for newer, complex therapies. Patients would like educational support for T2DM management; clinicians would like to learn more about newer therapies and easier referral processes., Conclusions: Patient-centered care includes managing T2DM from a variety of clinical settings for individuals with HIV, yet strategies are needed to better support clinicians. Future research should examine how best to implement these strategies., Competing Interests: APP reports grants from RRF Foundation for Aging and commercial funders Merck, Pfizer, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Lundbeck, Gilead, and Eli Lilly through her institution; and personal fees from commercial funder Gilead. SCB reports grants from the NIH and RRF Foundation for Aging, and commercial funders Merck, Pfizer, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Lundbeck, Gilead and Eli Lilly through her institution; and personal fees from commerical funders Gilead, Sanofi, Pfizer, University of Westminster, Lundbeck, and Luto outside the submitted work. MCM reports grants from the NIH and commerical funder Merck through her institution. AW reports grants from commerical funder NovoNordisk through her institution, and research salary support from UnitedHealth Group. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials., (Copyright: © 2024 Pack et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Caregivers provide critical support for older adults managing multiple chronic conditions (MCCs), but few studies describe the assistance caregivers provide or identify factors influencing their provision of support. We conducted qualitative interviews with 25 caregivers to older adults with MCCs to describe caregivers' roles and identify the factors that influence caregivers' ability to carry out these roles. Transcripts were analyzed using the Framework Method. Caregivers supported the management of MCCs in several ways, including monitoring conditions, communicating with clinicians, and tracking health information. Disagreement, or conflicted relationships, between caregivers and older adults over health and behaviors influenced the provision of support, resulting in less involved and less effective caregivers. Caregivers in conflicted relationships were more challenged by resistance from older adults. Greater agreement, or collaboration, between caregivers and older adults resulted in more involved and effective caregivers. Addressing health-related conflict may enhance caregivers' capacity to support older adults with MCCs., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsAR, MB, RL, and RO have no conflicts to disclose. AP reports grants from RRF Foundation for Aging, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Merck, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, and Gilead through her institution and personal fees from Gilead. MW reports grants from the NIH, Amgen, Lundbeck, Merck, Pfizer, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and Eli Lilly during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Sanofi, Pfizer, University of Westminster, and Luto outside the submitted work.

Objectives: Medication overuse headache (MOH) is a common, debilitating condition occurring when migraine patients overuse pain relief medications. We conducted a convergent mixed methods study examining patient-provider communication on MOH., Methods: Migraine patients were identified from one academic health center via electronic health records. Research staff recruited patients and administered a remote survey on MOH awareness, knowledge, and communication; descriptive and bivariate analyses were conducted. Neurologists from the same health center were invited to participate in qualitative interviews; analysis drew from the Rapid Identification of Themes from Audio Recordings procedures. A side-by-side comparison of results followed., Results: Participants included 200 patients and 13 neurologists. More than one third of patients (39.5 %) had never heard of 'medication overuse headache.' Among those who had, 38.4 % learned about MOH ≥ 5 years after their migraine diagnosis. Neurologists similarly reported limited patient awareness of MOH and suggested communication was provider-initiated, reactive to patient-reported symptoms and behaviors. Participants agreed MOH was described as a 'consequence' of frequent medication taking, though specific terminology varied with neurologists suggesting they choose terms they perceive to be easier to understand and less stigmatizing to patients. Neurologists felt they lacked effective patient education resources., Conclusions: Findings reveal delayed opportunities to inform patients about MOH. Standardized education supporting early preventive communication is needed, perhaps in primary care where many patients seek initial care for migraine symptoms., Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dr. Pack reports grants from Merck, Pfizer, Gilead, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, RRF Foundation for Aging, Lundbeck, and Eli Lilly through her institution, and personal fees from Gilead. Dr. Bailey reports grants from the NIH, Gilead, Merck, Pfizer, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, RRF Foundation for Aging, Lundbeck, and Eli Lilly via her institution and personal fees from Gilead, Sanofi, Pfizer, University of Westminster, Lundbeck, and Luto UK outside the submitted work. Ms. Herman is employed full time by Lundbeck and Dr. Kymes was employed full time by Lundbeck at the time of the research., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Objectives: The global prevalence of multimorbidity is increasing as the population ages. As individuals get older, they are likely to develop multiple chronic conditions, and nearly two-thirds of older adults in the United States are estimated to experience 2 or more chronic conditions. The present preregistered study examined whether multimorbidity was associated with longitudinal changes in health-related quality of life (i.e., anxiety, depression, and physical function) and whether these associations were moderated by sociodemographic factors (i.e., sex, race, marital status, income, insurance, and education)., Methods: Data come from the Health Literacy and Cognitive Function Among Older Adults Longitudinal Study (LitCog), a prospective cohort study of English-speaking older adults (N = 900). At each measurement occasion, participants reported anxiety, depression, and physical function using the Patient Reported Outcomes Information System, chronic conditions, and sociodemographic characteristics. We employed multilevel growth models to estimate changes in health-related quality of life, with multimorbidities as a predictor and sociodemographics as covariates., Results: Results indicated that individuals with multiple chronic conditions reported persistently high levels of anxiety and depression, and worse physical function. We found evidence for racial health disparities, such that individuals who identified as non-White experienced worse health-related quality of life as multimorbidities increased, relative to White participants., Discussion: These results contribute to the current conversation about the long-term impacts of structural and systemic barriers experienced by minoritized groups. We further discuss the public health implications of multimorbidity in older adulthood., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Purpose: To test the feasibility of a novel self-management support intervention for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)., Methods: We conducted a feasibility randomized controlled trial involving patients ≥40 years with severe or very severe COPD in New York, New York (n=59). Community health workers screened patients and addressed barriers to COPD self-management. Patients were also offered home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HBPR) and an antibiotic and steroid rescue pack. Control patients received general COPD education. Clinical outcomes for intervention and control were compared by difference-in-differences (DiD) at baseline and 6 months. The study was not powered for statistically significant differences for any measure. Feasibility measures were collected at 6 months., Results: There were high rates of completion of intervention activities, including 75% of patients undergoing evaluation for and participating in HBPR. Most (92%) intervention patients said the program was very or extremely helpful and 96% said they would participate again. Clinical outcomes generally favored the intervention: COPD assessment test, DiD -1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] -5.9 to 3.6); 6-minute walk test distance, DiD 7.4 meters (95% CI -45.1 to 59.8); self-reported hospitalizations, DiD -9.8% (95% CI -42.3% to 22.8%); medication adherence, DiD 7.7% (-29.6%, 45.0%), and Physical Activity Adult Questionnaire, DiD 86 (95% CI -283 to 455). Intervention patients reported more emergency department visits, DiD 10.6% (95% CI 17.7% to 38.8%)., Conclusions: A highly patient-centered, self-management support intervention for people with COPD was well received by patients and associated with potential improvements in clinical and self-management outcomes. A fully powered study of the intervention is warranted., (JCOPDF © 2024.)

Objective: Many older adults receive assistance in managing their chronic conditions. Yet complicating the utility of caregiver support is whether caregivers have sufficient skills to aid in older adults' health management at home. We examined associations between caregiver health literacy and performance on health tasks., Methods: Caregivers to older adults enrolled in a cognitive aging cohort were recruited to participate in a supplemental interview ( n  = 97). Caregivers completed one structured interview that included assessments of health literacy and health task performance., Results: Caregivers demonstrated a range of health literacy skills (44% adequate, 36% marginal, 20% low health literacy). In adjusted analyses, caregivers with marginal and low health literacy demonstrated worse overall performance on the health tasks, and poorer interpretation of health information presented on print documents and recall of spoken communication (p's < 0.05)., Conclusion: Caregivers with marginal or low health literacy demonstrated poorer performance on everyday health tasks that they commonly assist older adults with. The application of health literacy best-practices to support better training and capacity-building for caregivers is warranted., Innovation: Few studies have considered the health literacy skills of caregivers and its application to caregivers' abilities to carry out common supportive tasks., Competing Interests: Dr. O'Conor reports grants from the NIH outside of the submitted work. Dr. Wolf reports grants from the NIH, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and Eli Lilly, and personal fees from Pfizer, Sanofi, Luto UK, University of Westminster, Lundbeck and GlaxoSmithKline outside the submitted work. All other authors report no conflicts of interest., (© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Introduction: COVID-19 is an unprecedented public health threat in modern times, especially for older adults or those with chronic illness. Beyond the threat of infection, the pandemic may also have longer-term impacts on mental and physical health. The COVID-19 & Chronic Conditions ('C3') study offers a unique opportunity to assess psychosocial and health/healthcare trajectories over 5 years among a diverse cohort of adults with comorbidities well-characterised from before the pandemic, at its onset, through multiple surges, vaccine rollouts and through the gradual easing of restrictions as society slowly returns to 'normal'., Methods and Analysis: The C3 study is an extension of an ongoing longitudinal cohort study of 'high-risk' adults (aged 23-88 at baseline) with one or more chronic medical conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Five active studies with uniform data collection prior to COVID-19 were leveraged to establish the C3 cohort; 673 adults in Chicago were interviewed during the first week of the outbreak. The C3 cohort has since expanded to include 1044 participants across eight survey waves (T 1 -T 8 ). Four additional survey waves (T 9 -T 12 ) will be conducted via telephone interviews spaced 1 year apart and supplemented by electronic health record and pharmacy fill data, for a total of 5 years of data post pandemic onset. Measurement will include COVID-19-related attitudes/behaviours, mental health, social behaviour, lifestyle/health behaviours, healthcare use, chronic disease self-management and health outcomes. Mental health trajectories and associations with health behaviours/outcomes will be examined in a series of latent group and mixed effects modelling, while also examining mediating and moderating factors., Ethics and Dissemination: This study was approved by Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine Institutional Review Board (STU00215360). Results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and summaries will be provided to the funders of the study., Competing Interests: Competing interests: SCB reports grants from the NIH, Merck, Pfizer, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Retirement Research Foundation for Aging, Lundbeck, Gilead and Eli Lilly via her institution and personal fees from Sanofi, Pfizer, University of Westminster, Lundbeck, Gilead and Luto UK outside the submitted work. MW reports grants from the NIH, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and Eli Lilly, and personal fees from Pfizer, Sanofi, Luto UK, University of Westminster and Lundbeck outside the submitted work. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: Many older adults receive assistance in managing chronic conditions. Yet complicating the utility of caregiver support is whether caregivers have sufficient skills to aid in a patient's self-care. Health literacy and cognition are important determinants of older adults' health outcomes, but few studies have examined caregiver health literacy, cognition and self-care skills and their relations to patient outcomes., Methods and Analysis: We will expand an ongoing cognitive ageing cohort study (LitCog) to enroll a parallel caregiver cohort. Caregivers are eligible if they are (1) ≥18 years of age, (2) provided care for ≥6 months and (3) assisted with at least one activity of daily living, instrumental activity of daily living or health management task. Caregivers will complete interviews at time points corresponding with the LitCog participant interviews. Caregivers will complete assessments of health literacy, self-care skills, cognitive function, caregiver healthcare task difficulty, caregiver burden, caregiver self-efficacy, activation, technology use, busyness and routine and relationship quality. Caregivers will self-report the nature and intensity of care provided, and their own health status. Associations between caregiver presence and caregiver capacity with patient outcomes will be examined in a series of regression models, and mediating and moderating factors will be tested., Ethics and Dissemination: The Institutional Review Board at Northwestern University has approved the study protocol (STU00026255). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and summaries will be provided to the funders of the study as well as patients and caregivers., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MW reports grants from the NIH, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and Eli Lilly, and personal fees from Pfizer, Sanofi, Luto UK, University of Westminster, Lundbeck and GlaxoSmithKline outside the submitted work. All other authors report no conflicts of interest., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: We investigated how individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and multi-morbidity (MM) navigate barriers and facilitators to their health management., Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study using semi-structured interviews and survey assessments of adults with COPD, hypertension, and/or diabetes. We recruited 18 participants with an average age of 65, with 39% being male, 50% Black, and 22% Hispanic/Latino/a. Five investigators used an iterative, hybrid-coding process combining a priori and emergent codes to analyze transcripts and compare quantitative and qualitative data for themes., Results: Participants reported a generalized approach to their health rather than managing MMs separately. Individuals with good or mixed adherence found daily routines facilitated regular medication use, while those with poor adherence experienced complex prescriptions and life stressors as barriers. Walking was viewed as beneficial but challenging due to limited mobility. Most participants viewed diet as important to their MMs, but only two reported high diet quality and many held inaccurate beliefs about healthy diet choices., Discussion: Participants with MM were highly motivated to engage in self-management activities, but some individuals experienced barriers to maintaining them. Emphasizing an individualized clinical approach to assessing and solving patient barriers may improve self-management outcomes in this complex population.

Introduction: The lack of definitive means to prevent or treat cognitive impairment or dementia is driving intense efforts to identify causal mechanisms. Recent evidence suggests clinically meaningful declines in cognition might present as early as middle age. Studying cognitive changes in middle adulthood could elucidate modifiable factors affecting later cognitive and health outcomes, yet few cognitive ageing studies include this age group. The purpose of the MidCog study is to begin investigations of less-studied and potentially modifiable midlife determinants of later life cognitive outcomes., Methods and Analysis: MidCog is a prospective cohort study of adults ages 35-64, with two in-person interviews 2.5 years apart. Data will be collected from interviews, electronic health records and pharmacy fill data. Measurements will include health literacy, self-management skills, cognitive function, lifestyle and health behaviours, healthcare use, health status and chronic disease outcomes. Associations of health literacy and self-management skills with health behaviours and cognitive/health outcomes will be examined in a series of regression models, and moderating effects of modifiable psychosocial factors.Finally, MidCog data will be linked to an ongoing, parallel cohort study of older adults recruited at ages 55-74 in 2008 ('LitCog'; ages 70-90 in 2023), to explore associations between age, health literacy, self-management skills, chronic diseases, health status and cognitive function among adults ages 35-90., Ethics and Dissemination: The Institutional Review Board at Northwestern University has approved the MidCog study protocol (STU00214736). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and summaries will be provided to the funders of the study as well as patients., Competing Interests: Competing interests: SCB reports grants from the NIH, Merck, Pfizer, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Retirement Research Foundation for Aging, Lundbeck, Gilead, and Eli Lilly via her institution and personal fees from Sanofi, Pfizer, University of Westminster, Lundbeck, Gilead, and Luto UK outside the submitted work. PCZ reports grants from the NIH and Vanda via her institution and personal consulting fees from Jazz, Eisai, Harmony and Sleep Number that are outside the submitted work. MW reports grants from the NIH, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and Eli Lilly, and personal fees from Pfizer, Sanofi, Luto UK, University of Westminster, and Lundbeck outside the submitted work. RO’C is supported by a training grant from the National Institute on Aging (K01AG070107). All the other authors report no conflict of interest., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Busyness (the density of activities) and daily routine (patterns of organizing time) are two understudied factors that likely impact medication-taking behaviors. We examined the association between busyness and routine with medication adherence (MA) in 405 older adults with adequate cognition using multivariable models. The final model included an interaction term between daily routine and busyness. MA scores (measured by the ASK-12, higher scores mean more barriers to adherence) were higher for individuals reporting low and moderate levels of daily routine versus those with high daily routine. MA scores were higher for individuals reporting moderate and high busyness versus those reporting low busyness. The busyness/routine interaction term was significant for MA; among highly busy individuals, those with high daily routine had lower MA scores than those with low routine. A daily routine may be a modifiable factor for improving MA among older adults, particularly among those with busy lives.

Objective: New self-management interventions are being developed for older adults who suffer from worse asthma morbidity than their younger counterparts, but high rates of study drop out have hampered these efforts and there is limited literature on what factors may influence retention in behavioral intervention studies with older adults. This study analyzed illness beliefs and patient characteristics that may contribute to retention in an asthma self-management trial for older adults., Methods: This is a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial of a self-management support intervention for adults 60 years and older with persistent, uncontrolled asthma. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of medication and illness beliefs, and other subject characteristics with study retention, which was defined as completion of the research study interview at 6 and 12 months., Results: The randomized trial enrolled 388 individuals; 261 (67.3%) completed the 12-month interview. Higher perceived threat of chronic diseases relative to asthma was associated with higher study retention (OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.00-1.24) at 12 months. Other variables including asthma beliefs, age, cognitive function, health literacy, and asthma symptoms were not significantly associated with retention., Conclusions: Concern about non-asthma chronic conditions, but no other illness beliefs, or patient characteristics, were associated with retention in an asthma self-management support intervention. Further research, including qualitative studies, is needed to better understand why patients drop out of asthma behavioral intervention studies.

Abstract: The U.S. public health response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been widely criticized as having downplayed the potential implications COVID-19 could have on one's personal health. Despite the unprecedented threat of COVID-19, many individuals still believed that it was not at all likely that they would become infected. We sought to investigate trends in adults' perceived susceptibility to COVID-19 over the first year of the pandemic, whether distinct trajectories emerged, and if these trajectories differed by participant socio-demographic characteristics.This was a longitudinal cohort study with 5 time points of data collection (March 13, 2020-March 3, 2021). Subjects included 627 adults living with ≥1 chronic conditions, who completed a baseline interview and at least one follow-up interview. In addition to collecting relevant socio-demographic characteristics, participants' perceived susceptibility to COVID-19 across time was assessed and classified into distinct trajectories.Nearly two-thirds (62.2%) of participants perceived themselves to be highly susceptible to COVID-19 from the onset of the pandemic ("early responders") and sustained this over a year, a third (29.0%) eventually perceived themselves to be highly susceptible ("late responders"), and 8.8% maintained a low likelihood of susceptibility throughout the pandemic ("non-responders"). In multivariable analyses, compared to White participants, Latinx participants were significantly more likely to be non-responders and report low likelihood of perceived susceptibility (Risk Ratio [RR]: 3.46; 95% confidence interval: 1.19, 10.1), as were Black participants (RR: 5.49; 95% confidence interval: 2.19, 13.8).A year into the COVID-19 pandemic, 1 out of 11 participants persistently did not think they might be susceptible and potentially infected. Future studies are needed to understand reasons why certain individuals, particularly those of racial/ethnic minorities, did not perceive themselves at risk for infection., Competing Interests: MSW reports grants from the NIH during the conduct of the study; grants from Merck, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, the NIH, and Eli Lilly outside the submitted work; and personal fees from Sanofi, Pfizer, and Luto outside the submitted work. SCB reports grants from the NIH during the conduct of the study; grants from Merck, the NIH, and Eli Lilly outside the submitted work; grants and personal fees from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation outside the submitted work; and personal fees from Sanofi, Pfizer, and Luto outside the submitted work. LAO, LMC, MJK, RO, GAW, JYB, RML, MRE, and AMZ have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Objective: Depression is associated with poor outcomes among older adults with asthma, and the presence of multiple comorbidities may magnify this relationship. We sought to determine the association of comorbidities with depressive symptoms among older adults with asthma., Methods: Secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial of older adults with poorly controlled asthma and comorbidities. Comorbidities were measured in two ways: (1) as a count of all the patient's chronic diseases, and (2) as a count of chronic illnesses with self-management intensive needs (diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure). Depressive symptoms were measured using the PROMIS SF8a scale. Multiple regression analyses tested the relationship between comorbidities and depressive symptoms, adjusting for sociodemographic factors., Results: Overall, 25% of participants had moderate-severe levels of depressive symptoms, 87% had ≥ two comorbidities, and 41% had ≥ one comorbidity with self-management intensive needs. The count of all comorbidities was significantly associated with depressive symptoms ( F (8, 330) = 7.7, p  < 0.0001, R 2 = 0.158) in adjusted models, whereas the count of self-management intensive conditions was not significantly associated with depressive symptoms in adjusted analyses., Conclusions: In older adults with asthma and multiple comorbidities, depressive symptoms increased with the overall count of comorbidities but not with the count of comorbidities with self-management intensive needs. Given the impact of depression on asthma outcomes for older adults, the mechanisms by which comorbid illness contributes to depressive symptoms in older asthmatics warrants further evaluation.

Older adults are often underrepresented in clinical research, even though older adults are major consumers of novel therapies. We present major themes and recommendations from the 2021 "Inclusion of Older Adults in Clinical Research" Workshop, convened by the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Inclusion of Older Adults as a Model for Special Populations Workgroup and the Research Centers Collaborative Network (RCCN). The goal of this workshop was to develop strategies to assist the research community in increasing the inclusion of older adults in clinical research. Major identified barriers include historical lack of federal guidelines, ageist biases and stereotypes, and lack of recruitment and retention techniques or infrastructure focused on older adults. Three key recommendations emerged: 1) engaging with the policymaking process to further promote inclusion; 2) using the CTSA Workgroup Presentation Materials Library and other resources to overcome ageism, and 3) building institutional capacity to support age inclusion., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (© The Author(s) 2022.)

In a survey of older adults at higher risk for COVID-19 complications, we sought to describe expectations of trust in the safety and efficacy of a future COVID-19 vaccine, and level of hesitancy about receiving it. We also assessed whether these expectations were associated with known or suspected contributors to vaccine hesitancy, disparities in vaccine receipt, and potential targets for public health outreach. From May 1-22, 2020, we performed telephone surveys of 601 older adults with chronic conditions in metro Chicago about their COVID-19 experiences and levels of vaccine trust and hesitancy. All participants previously completed assessments of demographics, health status, health literacy and activation. Bivariate associations were performed using t-tests or one-way ANOVA, and multivariate analyses using least square means. Younger age (<60), Black race, greater complacency about contracting COVID-19, and lower confidence in state or local government were associated with significantly lower trust in a vaccine's safety and efficacy. Black race and greater complacency about contracting COVID-19 were associated with a significantly greater vaccine hesitancy. Amongst Black participants, vaccine hesitancy varied significantly by confidence in the federal government. Trust and hesitancy regarding a future COVID-19 vaccine were associated with age, race, complacency regarding contracting COVID-19, and confidence in government response to the pandemic, but not education, health literacy or activation. Therefore, efforts to vaccinate higher risk older adults must aim not only to educate and provide vaccine access, but engender trust in the vaccine development process and vaccination strategies at both the federal and the local level., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: To identify patient characteristics associated with improvements in asthma control among older adults with asthma., Methods: Secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial of an asthma self-management support intervention for adults ages 60 and older with moderate-severe persistent asthma ( n  = 391). We tested the association of baseline patient characteristics with reduced emergency department (ED) visits and improvement in asthma control equal to or exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in asthma control test (ACT) scores (3.0) 12 months., Results: At baseline, the mean age was 68 years, 15.0% were male, 30.3% were black, and 56.5% were Hispanic. Patients with a history of ED visits in the 12 months preceding study enrollment were significantly more likely to experience an ED visit during the study period (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 6.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.18-21.9, p  < .0001). Similarly, those with poorer asthma control (baseline ACT scores <13) had greater odds of achieving improved asthma control (AOR 13.7, 95% CI 5.32-35.1, p  < .0001). No other variables had statistically significant associations with the outcomes., Conclusions: Low scores on the asthma control test and prior ED visits for asthma are strong correlates of later clinically meaningful changes in asthma control among older adults. Health systems preparing for population management of patients with asthma ought to consider incorporating serial collection of data on the ACT into the monitoring and management of older asthmatics, a high-risk patient population.

Challenges with self-management are a major contributor to poor outcomes among adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The causes of poor self-management in COPD are manifold, and they arise from physical, cognitive, socioeconomic, environmental and societal sources. To address this complexity, we developed the Supporting self-Management Behaviors in Adults with COPD (SaMBA-COPD) model, which uses lay health coaches to identify a patient's barriers to effective COPD self-management and provide tailored support to help them overcome those barriers, reduce their symptoms and need for urgent care and improve their quality of life. The 6-month intervention includes referral of patients to a pharmacist for prescription of antibiotic and oral steroid "rescue packs" and support for a structured home exercise routine. All interactions of coaches and patients will take place by telephone or video call. We will test the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of SaMBA-COPD in a trial of 58 patients randomized 1:1 to the intervention or a COPD education control. Outcomes will be assessed at 6 and 9 months. Data from the trial will be used to inform the design of a fully powered, multi-site randomized trial of the intervention., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We sought to characterize caregiver medication assistance for older adults with multiple chronic conditions., Design: Semi-structured qualitative interviews., Setting: Community and academic-affiliated primary care practices., Participants: A total of 25 caregivers to older adults participating in an ongoing cohort study with ≥3 chronic conditions., Measurements: A semi-structured interview guide, informed by the Medication Self-Management model, aimed to understand health-related and medication-specific assistance caregivers provided., Results: Three typologies of caregiver assistance with medications emerged: Actively Involved, Peripherally Involved, and Not Involved. A total of 10 caregivers were Actively Involved, which was defined as when the caregiver perceived a need for and offered assistance, and the patient accepted the assistance. Peripherally Involved (n = 6) was defined as when the caregiver perceived a need and offered assistance; however, the patient rejected this assistance, yet relied on the caregiver as a backup in managing his or her medications. To combat resistance from the patient, caregivers in this typology disguised assistance and deployed workaround strategies to monitor medication-taking behaviors to ensure safety. Lastly, nine caregivers were classified as Not Involved, defined as when the caregiver did not perceive a need to offer assistance with medications, and the patient managed his or her medicines independently. A strong preference toward autonomy in medication management was shared across all three typologies., Conclusion: These findings suggest that caregivers value independent medication management by their care recipient, up until safety is seriously questioned. Clinicians should not assume caregivers are actively and consistently involved in older adults' medication management; instead, they should initiate conversations with patients and caregivers to better understand and facilitate co-management responsibilities, especially among those whose assistance is rejected by older adults., (© 2021 The American Geriatrics Society.)

Objective: To determine the relative contributions of health literacy (HL) and illness and medication beliefs to medication adherence among older COPD patients and determine the pathways through which they operate., Methods: The study was conducted using data from a prospective cohort of COPD patients in New York City and Chicago. We used structural equation modeling to examine the pathways linking HL, through medications and illness beliefs, with COPD medication adherence., Results: Out of 393 older adults with COPD, 123 (31%) had limited HL and 208 (53%) reported low adherence to daily COPD medications. Those with limited HL were more likely to have low medication adherence (p < 0.0001). Medications concerns (p = 0.001) and medication necessity (p = 0.003) demonstrated a mediational role between HL and adherence. However, in the final multivariate model, HL did not have direct effect on medication adherence (p = 0.12) and illness beliefs (p = 0.16) did not demonstrate a mediational role between HL and adherence., Conclusion: Our findings suggest that low HL is not a direct predictor of poor medication adherence among COPD patients., Practice Implications: Addressing medication concerns and reinforcing the need for daily COPD medications may be a more effective strategy for increasing adherence in this population., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Juan P. Wisnivesky is a member of the research board of EHE International, has received consulting fees from Merck, UBS, and IMS Health, and was awarded a research grant from GlaxoSmithKline to conduct a COPD study. All remaining authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To identify and characterize the constellation, or clusters, of self-management behaviors in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and comorbid hypertension., Methods: Cluster analysis (n = 204) was performed with standardized scores for medication adherence to COPD and hypertension medications, inhaler technique, and diet as well as self-reported information on physical activity, appointment keeping, smoking status, and yearly influenza vaccination for a total of eight variables. Classification and regression tree analysis (CART) was performed to further characterize the resulting clusters., Results: Patients were divided into three clusters based on eight self-management behaviors, which included 95 patients in cluster 1, 42 in cluster 2, and 67 in cluster 3. All behaviors except for inhaler technique differed significantly among the three clusters (P's<0.005). CART indicated physical activity was the first differentiating variable., Conclusions: Patients with COPD and hypertensioncan be separated into those with adequate and inadequate adherence. The group with inadequate adherence can further be divided into those with poor adherence to medical behaviors compared to those with poor adherence to lifestyle behaviors., Practice Implications: Once validated in other populations, the identification of patient clusters using patient self-management behaviors could be used to inform interventions for patients with multimorbidity., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Physical distancing precautions during the COVID-19 pandemic may challenge the provision of tangible support many middle age and older adults receive in managing their health. We examined the association between unmet tangible support needs and self-management behaviors and mental health status during the stay-at-home orders in Chicago and New York., Methods: We used data from the COVID-19 & Chronic Conditions study collected between May 1st and May 22nd, 2020. A total of 801 middle age and older adults with ≥1 chronic condition in Chicago and New York City completed the telephone interview. Adequacy of tangible social support was measured using a brief, validated scale that determined whether an individual needed assistance managing his or her health, and if yes, whether this need was met. Participants reported their level of difficulty engaging in self-management behaviors using 2 discrete items; they also self-reported medication adherence using the ASK-12 medication adherence scale. Mental health status was measured using the depression and anxiety PROMIS short-form instruments., Results: Participants' mean age was 63 years; 30% identified as Black, 26% identified as Latino, and 12% identified unmet support needs. Inadequacy of tangible support was associated with greater difficulty managing one's health and accessing medications due to COVID-19, as well as poorer medication adherence, increased anxiety and depressive symptoms, and poorer overall well-being ( P 's < .05)., Conclusions: Perceived unmet support needs during stay-at-home orders were associated with greater difficulty engaging in self-management behaviors and poorer overall well-being. Two brief items quickly identified individuals with unmet support needs.

Accurate understanding of COVID-19 safety recommendations early in the outbreak was complicated by inconsistencies in public health and media messages. We sought to characterize high-risk adults' knowledge of COVID-19 symptoms, prevention strategies, and prevention behaviors. We used data from the Chicago COVID-19 Comorbidities (C3) survey collected between March 13 thru March 20, 2020. A total of 673 predominately older adults with ≥ 1 chronic condition completed the telephone interview. Knowledge was assessed by asking participants to name three symptoms of COVID-19 and three actions to prevent infection. Participants were then asked if and how they had changed plans due to coronavirus. Most participants could identify three symptoms (71.0%) and three preventive actions (69.2%). Commonly reported symptoms included: fever (78.5%), cough (70.6%), and shortness of breath (45.2%); preventive actions included: washing hands (86.5%) and social distancing (86.2%). More than a third of participants reported social distancing themselves (38.3%), and 28.8% reported obtaining prescription medication to prepare for the outbreak. In multivariable analyses, no participant characteristics were associated with COVID-19 knowledge. Women were more likely than men, and Black adults were less likely than White adults to report practicing social distancing. Individuals with low health literacy were less likely to report obtaining medication supplies. In conclusion, though most higher-risk individuals were aware of social distancing as a prevention strategy early in the outbreak, less than half reported enacting it, and racial disparities were apparent. Consistent messaging and the provision of tangible resources may improve future adherence to safety recommendations.

Background: Family caregivers of older adults frequently navigate the health system for their loved ones. As older adults experience more medical issues, the interactions between caregivers and the health system can be fraught with conflicts., Objective: To characterize the conflicts that caregivers of older adults experience with the health-care system., Methods: A cross-sectional national online survey with open-ended questions was conducted among family caregivers ascertaining experiences with the health-care system. Qualitative thematic analysis was completed using constant comparative analysis and review by a third author., Results: Over a 2-month period, 97 caregivers completed the survey. Common themes where caregivers experienced conflicts were Difficulty With Accessing/Communicating With Providers, Delivery of Emergency Care, Disjointed Transitional Care, Unaddressed Clinical Concerns, and Financial. Caregivers reported needing to act as patient advocates in the conflicts with the health-care system., Conclusion: Understanding the conflicts that family caregivers encounter with the health system provides potential targets for future interventions to combat the challenges faced by caregivers of older adults and ultimately improve delivery of geriatric care., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© The Author(s) 2020.)

Background and Objectives: Home care agencies (HCAs) provide caregivers, who perform an important role in maintaining the health and well-being of older adults. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, paid caregivers had the potential to inadvertently spread COVID-19. We sought to characterize the effects of COVID-19 on HCAs and examine HCAs' infection prevention and control (IPC) policies., Research Design and Methods: This was a qualitative analysis of data collected from a national survey of HCAs. Surveys were e-mailed to members of a national HCA association on March 18, 2020. Questions included queries on demographics, COVID-19 exposures, effects of COVID-19, and IPC protocols., Results: 1204 HCAs responded with an average census of 96.2 (5-2800) patients daily. Across 36 states, 238 HCAs reported COVID-19 cases or exposures among caregivers. HCAs experienced challenges related to changing patient needs (e.g. decreased caregiver requests), staffing shortages (e.g., fear of COVID-19, inability to train caregivers), and management issues (e.g., inability to obtain supplies). ICP protocols varied in how HCAs followed recommended guidelines, responded to COVID-19 exposures, performed infection surveillance, and implemented precautions. Additionally, HCAs had varying policies for caregiver PTO., Conclusions: HCAs experienced COVID-19 exposures and/or cases early in the pandemic. HCAs identified staffing and PPE shortages, and lack of IPC guidance as challenges. Although caregivers are providing essential care for millions of older adults, they have been largely absent from federal, state, and health system strategies for mitigating the spread of COVID-19. Future policies must include HCAs and their caregivers to optimize care for older adults., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All authors: No reported conflicts., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: The US outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) accelerated rapidly over a short time to become a public health crisis., Objective: To assess how high-risk adults' COVID-19 knowledge, beliefs, behaviors, and sense of preparedness changed from the onset of the US outbreak (March 13-20, 2020) to the acceleration phase (March 27-April 7, 2020)., Design: Longitudinal, two-wave telephone survey., Participants: 588 predominately older adults with ≥ 1 chronic condition recruited from 4 active, federally funded studies in Chicago., Main Measures: Self-reported knowledge of COVID-19 symptoms and prevention, related beliefs, behaviors, and sense of preparedness., Key Results: From the onset to the acceleration phase, participants increasingly perceived COVID-19 to be a serious public health threat, reported more changes to their daily routine and plans, and reported greater preparedness. The proportion of respondents who believed they were "not at all likely" to get the virus decreased slightly (24.9 to 22.4%; p = 0.04), but there was no significant change in the proportion of those who were unable to accurately identify ways to prevent infection (29.2 to 25.7%; p 0.14). In multivariable analyses, black adults and those with lower health literacy were more likely to report less perceived susceptibility to COVID-19 (black adults: relative risk (RR) 1.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-2.44, p = 0.02; marginal health literacy: RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.26-3.07, p < 0.01). Individuals with low health literacy remained more likely to feel unprepared for the outbreak (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.11-2.92, p = 0.02) and to express confidence in the federal government response (RR 2.11, 95% CI 1.49-3.00, p < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: Adults at higher risk for COVID-19 continue to lack critical knowledge about prevention. While participants reported greater changes to daily routines and plans, disparities continued to exist in perceived susceptibility to COVID-19 and in preparedness. Public health messaging to date may not be effectively reaching vulnerable communities.

This chapter summarizes research that investigated relationships between health literacy (using currently accepted measures) and specific classifications of health outcomes, including healthcare utilization. To better understand the causal pathway which limited health literacy affects poorer health outcomes, the literature is presented from proximal (health knowledge) to distal (mortality) outcomes. Overall, the most consistent evidence was observed at the most proximal and distal outcomes, but less consistent evidence with intermediary outcomes, particularly self-management behaviors and clinical health outcomes. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the findings and larger implications for the causal mechanisms which health literacy impacts health outcomes.

Objective: To test the association of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) illness and medication beliefs with those specific to hypertension or diabetes in patients with COPD and coexisting chronic conditions., Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of data collected from a sample of 282 adults with COPD and comorbid hypertension or diabetes recruited from primary care practices in New York, NY, and Chicago, IL. Beliefs about COPD, hypertension, and diabetes were measured using the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire. Higher scores indicate a more adaptive view of the illness. Beliefs about medications were measured using the 10-item Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire; higher scores on the two subscales indicate increased concerns and necessity, respectively., Results: In adjusted analyses, scores for COPD and hypertension as well as COPD and diabetes illness beliefs, medication necessity, and medication concern were significantly associated., Conclusion: Patients with COPD and comorbid hypertension or diabetes have consistent beliefs about their diseases and the medications used to treat them., Practice Implications: The consistency of beliefs across conditions may help in the development of a more holistic approach to disease management in patients with COPD who have comorbid illnesses and contribute to a better understanding of the Common-Sense Model of Illness Representation., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Wisnivesky received consulting honorarium from Sanofi and Banook and research grants from Sanofi and Quorum. To the best of our knowledge, no conflict of interest, financial or other, exists for the other authors listed., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)