Search

Joseph D Spahn,1 Christopher E Brightling,2 Paul M O’Byrne,3 Lisa J Simpson,4 Nestor A Molfino,5 Christopher S Ambrose,6 Neil Martin,2,7 Teal S Hallstrand8 1Respiratory and Immunology, BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA; 2Institute for Lung Health, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK; 3Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, St Joseph’s Hospital and Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; 4PharmaGenesis London, London, UK; 5Global Development, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA; 6Respiratory and Immunology, BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA; 7Respiratory and Immunology, BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK; 8Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, and the Center for Lung Biology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USACorrespondence: Joseph D Spahn, AstraZeneca, 1800 Concord Pike, Wilmington, DE, 19803, USA, Tel +1 303-886-5257, Email joe.spahn@astrazeneca.comBackground: Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) is a key feature of asthma. Biologic therapies used to treat asthma target specific components of the inflammatory pathway, and their effects on AHR can provide valuable information about the underlying disease pathophysiology. This review summarizes the available evidence regarding the effects of biologics on allergen-specific and non-allergen-specific airway responses in patients with asthma.Methods: We conducted a systematic review in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, including risk-of-bias assessment. PubMed and Ovid were searched for studies published between January 1997 and December 2021. Eligible studies were randomized, placebo-controlled trials that assessed the effects of biologics on AHR, early allergic response (EAR) and/or late allergic response (LAR) in patients with asthma.Results: Thirty studies were identified for inclusion. Bronchoprovocation testing was allergen-specific in 18 studies and non-allergen-specific in 12 studies. Omalizumab reduced AHR to methacholine, acetylcholine or adenosine monophosphate (3/9 studies), and reduced EAR (4/5 studies) and LAR (2/3 studies). Mepolizumab had no effect on AHR (3/3 studies), EAR or LAR (1/1 study). Tezepelumab reduced AHR to methacholine or mannitol (3/3 studies), and reduced EAR and LAR (1/1 study). Pitrakinra reduced LAR, with no effect on AHR (1/1 study). Etanercept reduced AHR to methacholine (1/2 studies). No effects were observed for lebrikizumab, tocilizumab, efalizumab, IMA-638 and anti-OX40 ligand on AHR, EAR or LAR; benralizumab on LAR; tralokinumab on AHR; and Ro-24-7472 on AHR or LAR (all 1/1 study each). No dupilumab or reslizumab studies were identified.Conclusion: Omalizumab and tezepelumab reduced EAR and LAR to allergens. Tezepelumab consistently reduced AHR to methacholine or mannitol. These findings provide insights into AHR mechanisms and the precise effects of asthma biologics. Furthermore, findings suggest that tezepelumab broadly targets allergen-specific and non-allergic forms of AHR, and the underlying cells and mediators involved in asthma.Keywords: airway hyperresponsiveness, allergic response, biologic, systematic review, asthma, randomized placebo-controlled trial

Asthma is characterized by discordant responses among cells of the adaptive and innate immune systems. This interplay involves a complex pattern of cytokine-driven processes resulting in cell migration and recruitment, inflammation, and proliferative states. The significant majority of asthmatic patients respond well to conventional inhaled treatments. However, about 5% of asthmatics have severe refractory asthma and account for 50% of the health expenditure on asthma. Human(ized)monoclonal antibodies (hMabs) targeting inflammatory pathways are promising therapeutic agents in asthma management. The anti-IgE hMab omalizumab was the first biologic treatment approved for the treatment of allergic asthma. Potential future strategies and targets include interleukin (IL)-5, IL-4, and IL-13, anti-TSLP, IL-25, and IL-33. hMabs targeting IL-5 have shown great promise in severe refractory asthma with a persisting eosinophilia, and clinical trials with hMabs against IL-13 and IL4Ra have also shown clinical benefit. Studies of hMabs against other cytokines in severe asthma are under way. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale: Increased bronchial vascularity is a feature of asthma that can contribute to airflow obstruction and progressive decline in lung function. Angiogenesis is associated with the lung homing and in situ differentiation of endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) in mouse models of asthma. We have previously shown that inhibiting allergen (Ag)-induced recruitment of EPC in sensitized mice attenuated increased bronchial vascularity and development of airway hyperresponsiveness.Objectives: We investigated the accumulation of EPC and formation of new blood vessels in the lungs of human subjects with asthma after Ag inhalation challenge.Methods: Consenting patients with mild atopic asthma (n = 13) with FEV1 ≥ 70%, methacholine PC20 ≤ 16 mg/ml, and a dual response to Ag were recruited. Sputum levels of EPC were determined by multigating flow cytometry, and lung vascularity was enumerated by immunostaining with von Willebrand factor.Measurements and Main Results: Sputum levels of EPC were determined by multigating flow cytometry and lung vascularity was enumerated by immunostaining with von Willebrand factor. There was a significant increase in sputum EPC levels 24 hours post Ag but not diluent challenge. Similarly, a significant increase in the number and diameter of blood vessels in lung biopsy tissue 24 hours post Ag was observed. In vitro culture of EPC demonstrated the capacity of these cells to differentiate into mature endothelial cells and form tubelike vessel structures. In sputum supernatants, there was a significant increase in CXCR2 agonists, IL-8, and Gro-α 24 hours post Ag. Only Gro-α stimulated a significant EPC migrational response in vitro.Conclusions: Our data suggest that increased lung homing of EPC may promote bronchial vascularity in allergic asthmatic responses and that the recruitment of these progenitors maybe orchestrated by CXCR2 chemokines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: The assessment of asthma control is pivotal to the evaluation of treatment response in individuals and in clinical trials. Previously, asthma control, severity, and exacerbations were defined and assessed in many different ways. PURPOSE: The Task Force was established to provide recommendations about standardization of outcomes relating to asthma control, severity, and exacerbations in clinical trials and clinical practice, for adults and children aged 6 years or older. METHODS: A narrative literature review was conducted to evaluate the measurement properties and strengths/weaknesses of outcome measures relevant to asthma control and exacerbations. The review focused on diary variables, physiologic measurements, composite scores, biomarkers, quality of life questionnaires, and indirect measures. RESULTS: The Task Force developed new definitions for asthma control, severity, and exacerbations, based on current treatment principles and clinical and research relevance. In view of current knowledge about the multiple domains of asthma and asthma control, no single outcome measure can adequately assess asthma control. Its assessment in clinical trials and in clinical practice should include components relevant to both of the goals of asthma treatment, namely achievement of best possible clinical control and reduction of future risk of adverse outcomes. Recommendations are provided for the assessment of asthma control in clinical trials and clinical practice, both at baseline and in the assessment of treatment response. CONCLUSIONS: The Task Force recommendations provide a basis for a multicomponent assessment of asthma by clinicians, researchers, and other relevant groups in the design, conduct, and evaluation of clinical trials, and in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

RATIONALE: The clinical management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) remains a major challenge due to lack of effective drug therapy or accurate indicators for disease progression. Fibrocytes are circulating mesenchymal cell progenitors that are involved in tissue repair and fibrosis. OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that assay of these cells may provide a biomarker for activity and progression of IPF. METHODS: Fibrocytes were defined as cells positive for CD45 and collagen-1 by flow cytometry and quantified in patients with stable IPF and during acute exacerbation of the disease. We investigated the clinical and prognostic value of fibrocyte counts by comparison with standard clinical parameters and survival. We used healthy age-matched volunteers and patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome as control subjects. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fibrocytes were significantly elevated in patients with stable IPF (n = 51), with a further increase during acute disease exacerbation (n = 7; P < 0.001 vs. control subjects). Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (n = 10) were not different from healthy control subjects or stable patients with IPF. Fibrocyte numbers were not correlated with lung function or radiologic severity scores, but they were an independent predictor of early mortality. The mean survival of patients with fibrocytes higher than 5% of total blood leukocytes was 7.5 months compared with 27 months for patients with less than 5% (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Fibrocytes are an indicator for disease activity of IPF and might be useful as a clinical marker for disease progression. This study suggests that quantification of circulating fibrocytes may allow prediction of early mortality in patients with IPF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

RATIONALE: To evaluate the association between asthma exacerbations and the decline in lung function, as well as the potential effects of an inhaled corticosteroid, budesonide, on exacerbation-related decline in patients with asthma. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether severe asthma exacerbations are associated with a persistent decline in lung function. METHODS: The START (inhaled steroid treatment as regular therapy in early asthma) study was a 3-year, randomized, double-blind study of 7,165 patients (5-66 yr) with persistent asthma for less than 2 years, to determine whether early intervention with low-dose inhaled budesonide prevents severe asthma-related events (exacerbations requiring hospitalization or emergency treatment) and decline in lung function. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 315 patients who experienced at least one severe asthma exacerbation, of which 305 were analyzable, 190 in the placebo group and 115 in the budesonide group. In the placebo group, the change in post-bronchodilator FEV(1) % predicted from baseline to the end of the study, in patients who did or did not experience a severe exacerbation was -6.44% and -2.43%, respectively (P < 0.001). A significant difference was seen in both children and in adults, but not in adolescents. In the budesonide group, the change in the post-bronchodilator FEV(1) % predicted in patients who did or did not experience a severe exacerbation was -2.48% and -1.72%, respectively (P = 0.57). The difference in magnitude of reduction afforded by budesonide, in patients who experienced at least one severe asthma-related event compared with those who did not, was statistically significant (P = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Severe asthma exacerbations are associated with a more rapid decline in lung function. Treatment with low doses of inhaled corticosteroid is associated with an attenuation of the decline. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Combination therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and long-acting beta(2)-agonists (LABAs), or treatment with high doses of ICSs alone improves asthma control when therapy with low-dose ICSs is not sufficient. However, it is not known which of these treatment options is more effective in sustaining asthma control.Objectives: To evaluate the effect of increasing the ICS dosage vs adding LABAs on the time spent with well-controlled asthma or poorly controlled asthma.Methods: Post hoc analysis of the Formoterol and Corticosteroid Establishing Therapy study, which compared a fourfold increase in the budesonide dose with and without formoterol.Results: Time with well-controlled asthma was improved by 19% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3 to 35%; p = 0.017) by adding formoterol, 24 microg/d, to therapy with budesonide, 200 microg/d, compared to 2% (95% CI, -9 to 12%; p = 0.76) with therapy with budesonide, 800 microg/d, alone. Time with well-controlled asthma was further improved by 29% (95% CI, 13 to 47%; p < 0.001) by adding formoterol to therapy with budesonide, 800 microg/d. Time with poorly controlled asthma was significantly reduced using the same interventions by 43% (95% CI, 25 to 57%), 22% (95% CI, 7 to 44%), and 50% (95% CI, 30 to 64%), respectively. Adding formoterol to budesonide was significantly more effective in increasing time with well-controlled asthma when compared to increasing the budesonide dose fourfold (increase, 16%; 95% CI, 1 to 33%; p = 0.035), with a trend for a greater reduction in time with poor control (decrease, 21%; 95% CI, -5 to 42%).Conclusion: The addition of formoterol to therapy with low-dose budesonide increases the probability of well-controlled asthma compared to a substantial increase in the dose of an ICS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

RATIONALE: Inhaled long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs), when used as monotherapy in asthma, may increase asthma-related hospitalizations, life threatening events requiring intubation/mechanical ventilation, and asthma-related deaths, but concomitant use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) may modify this effect. Objectives: To determine the safety of long-acting beta-agonists among patients with asthma using corticosteroids. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and metaanalysis of parallel-group, blinded, randomized, controlled trials with at least 12 weeks of treatment addressing the impact of LABA on asthma-related and total morbidity and mortality in patients concomitantly using ICS. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, ACPJC, and Cochrane (Central) databases, and contacted authors and sponsors. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We used a random effects model to pool results from different studies as odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence interval [CI]) (OR < 1.0 favors LABA). The search yielded 62 relevant studies included in this analysis. Among over 29,000 participants (15,710 taking LABA, with over 8,000 patient-years observed in the LABA groups), there were three asthma-related deaths and two asthma-related, nonfatal intubations (all in LABA groups;

Rationale: 1018 ISS is a synthetic oligonucleotide containing immunostimulatory CpG motifs. In animal studies, 1018 ISS effectively inhibited Th2-mediated lung inflammation, including eosinophil infiltration, and airway hyperresponsiveness. Objectives: To evaluate whether 1018 ISS has activity in subjects with allergic asthma. Methods: Forty subjects (n = 21, 1018 ISS; n = 19, placebo) were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to examine safety, pharmacologic activity, and efficacy of 1018 ISS on allergen-induced airway responses. Subjects received 36 mg of 1018 ISS or placebo by nebulization weekly for 4 wk. Measurements: Allergen inhalation challenge was performed 24 h after the 2nd and 4th doses to measure the early and late fall in FEV(1). Sputum cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected before and after dosing, and gene expression was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Main Results: Treatment with 1018 ISS significantly increased expression of interferon (IFN)-gamma and IFN-inducible genes, such as IFN-gamma-inducible 10 kD protein (IP10), monokine induced by IFN-gamma (MIG), IFN-stimulated gene (ISG)-54, monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1, and MCP-2 from cells collected postdose (p < 0.05). There was no attenuation of the early or late decrease in FEV(1) after 1018 ISS compared with placebo, nor a reduction in allergen-induced sputum eosinophils or Th2-related gene expression measured in sputum cells. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that 1018 ISS is safe and pharmacologically active in the respiratory tract of asthmatics but, at this dose regimen, did not inhibit a fall in FEV(1) or other key features of the response to inhaled allergen challenge. This suggests that induction of IFN and IFN-inducible genes alone is not sufficient to inhibit allergen-induced responses in asthmatic subjects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Asthma control is improved by combining inhaled corticosteroids with long-acting beta2-agonists. However, fluctuating asthma control still occurs. We hypothesized that in patients receiving low maintenance dose budesonide/formoterol (bud/form), replacing short-acting beta2-agonist (SABA) reliever with as-needed bud/form would provide rapid symptom relief and simultaneous adjustment in antiinflammatory therapy, thereby reducing exacerbations. In this double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study, 2,760 patients with asthma aged 4-80 years (FEV1 60-100% predicted) received either terbutaline 0.4 mg as SABA with bud/form 80/4.5 microg twice a day (bud/form + SABA) or bud 320 microg twice a day (bud + SABA) or bud/form 80/4.5 microg twice a day with 80/4.5 microg as-needed (bud/form maintenance + relief). Children used a once-nocte maintenance dose. Bud/form maintenance + relief prolonged time to first severe exacerbation (p < 0.001; primary endpoint), resulting in a 45-47% lower exacerbation risk versus bud/form + SABA (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.44, 0.67) or bud + SABA (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval 0.43, 0.65). Bud/form maintenance + relief also prolonged the time to the first, second, and third exacerbation requiring medical intervention (p < 0.001), reduced severe exacerbation rate, and improved symptoms, awakenings, and lung function compared with both fixed dosing regimens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We investigated the mechanisms by which leukotriene receptor antagonists decrease airway eosinophil number. In a randomized, double-blind crossover study, we examined the effects of 2 weeks of treatment with pranlukast 300 mg twice a day or placebo on allergen-induced changes in airway eosinophil number and bone marrow eosinophil progenitors in 15 subjects with mild asthma. Pranlukast treatment for 2 weeks decreased mean sputum eosinophil count from 0.15 x 10(6)/g (5.3% of cells) before treatment to 0.02 x 10(6)/g (0.7% of cells) after treatment (p < 0.05), whereas placebo did not. Pranlukast also decreased the eosinophil count (5.6% at 7 hours and 7.5% at 24 hours) (p < 0.05) after allergen inhalation compared with placebo (13.8% at 7 hours and 15.3% at 24 hours). There was a similar trend for sputum cells immunostaining for EG2, eotaxin, interleukin-5, and regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted. Pranlukast also significantly attenuated the allergen-induced increase in the number of bone marrow eosinophil/basophil cfu (mean 0.3) at 24 hours compared with placebo (mean 6.2). The proportion of CD34(+) cells expressing the eotaxin receptor CC chemokine receptor 3, 24 hours after allergen inhalation, was also reduced by pranlukast. We conclude that, the cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, pranlukast, attenuates allergen-induced increase in airway eosinophils by decreasing bone marrow eosinophilopoiesis and airway chemotactic and eosinophilopoietic cytokines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Focuses on the clinical expression of allergy in the lungs in Australia and New Zealand. Effects of inhalation of an allergen on the lungs; Degree of the airway hyperresponsiveness to pharmacologic stimulus; Pathogenesis of airway inflammation.

Airway hyperresponsiveness is a characteristic feature of asthma and consists of an increased sensitivity of the airways to an inhaled constrictor agonist, a steeper slope of the dose-response curve, and a greater maximal response to the agonist. Measurements of airway responsiveness are useful in making a diagnosis of asthma, particularly in patients who have symptoms that are consistent with asthma and who have no evidence of airflow obstruction. These tests can be performed quickly, safely, and reproducibly. Certain inhaled stimuli, such as environmental allergens, increase airway inflammation and enhance airway hyperresponsiveness. These changes in airway hyperresponsiveness are of much smaller magnitude than those seen when asthmatic patients with persistent airway hyperresponsiveness are compared to healthy subjects. They are, however, similar to changes occurring in asthmatic patients that are associated with worsening asthma control. The mechanisms of the transient allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness are not likely to fully explain the underlying mechanisms of the persistent airway hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although inhaled glucocorticosteroids are recommended for persistent asthma, their long-term effect on recent onset, mild, persistent asthma has yet to be established.Methods: We did a randomised, double-blind clinical trial in 7241 patients in 32 countries to assess the effects of budesonide in patients who had had mild persistent asthma for less than 2 years and who had not had previous regular treatment with glucocorticosteroids. Patients aged 5-66 years received either budesonide or placebo once daily for 3 years in addition to their usual asthma medications. The daily budesonide dose was 400 microg, or 200 microg for children younger than 11 years. The primary outcome was time to first severe asthma-related event, and analysis was by intention to treat.Findings: 198 of 3568 patients on placebo and 117 of 3597 on budesonide had at least one severe asthma exacerbation; hazard ratio 0.56 (95% CI 0.45-0.71, p<0.0001). Patients on budesonide had fewer courses of systemic corticosteroids and more symptom-free days than did those on placebo. Compared with placebo, budesonide increased postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) from baseline by 1.48% (p<0.0001) after 1 year and by 0.88% (p=0.0005) after 3 years (expressed as percent of the predicted value). The corresponding increase in prebronchodilator FEV1 was 2.24% after 1 year and 1.71% after 3 years (p<0.0001 at both timepoints). The effect of treatment on all outcome variables was independent of the baseline lung function (prebronchodilator or postbronchodilator) or baseline medication. In children younger than 11 years, 3-year growth was reduced in the budesonide group by 1.34 cm. The reduction was greatest in the first year of treatment (0.58 cm) than years 2 and 3 (0.43 cm and 0.33 cm, respectively).Interpretation: Long-term, once-daily treatment with low-dose budesonide decreases the risk of severe exacerbations and improves asthma control in patients with mild persistent asthma of recent onset. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cough severity represents an important endpoint to assess the impact of therapies for patients with refractory chronic cough (RCC)., Objective: To develop a new patient-reported outcome measure addressing cough severity in patients with RCC., Methods: Phase 1 (item generation): A systematic survey, focus groups, and expert consultation generated 51 items. Phase 2 (item reduction): From a list of 51 items, 100 patients identified those they had experienced in the previous year and rated their importance on a 5-point scale. The MCSQ included items reported to occur most frequently and that had the highest importance scores. Patient feedback on the MCSQ led to elimination of redundant items. Another 100 patients completed the MCSQ, from which we performed an exploratory factor analysis and a Rasch analysis to further refine items on the MCSQ., Results: Phase 2 led to selection of 15 items from the initial 51. Patient feedback on the 15 items led to elimination of 5 redundant items. An exploratory factor analysis of the 10-item MCSQ led to selection of two domains, elimination of one item that demonstrated cross-loading, and another that had high inter-item correlations. A Rasch analysis of the 8-item MCSQ confirmed that the response options functioned in a logically progressive manner and that no items exhibited differential item functioning. The final 8-item MCSQ has a one-week recall period and includes two domains (intensity and frequency). The 8-item MCSQ had high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, 0.89), proved able to distinguish different levels of cough severity (Pearson separation index, 0.89), and demonstrated high cross-sectional convergent validity (Pearson's correlation, 0.76 [95% CI 0.66 to 0.83]) with the 100-mm cough severity visual analogue scale., Conclusion: Initial evidence supports the validity of the MCSQ, an 8-item instrument measuring cough severity in patients with RCC. Future studies should evaluate its properties in measuring change over time., (Copyright ©The authors 2024.)

Importance: The optimal inhaled reliever therapy for asthma remains unclear., Objective: To compare short-acting β agonists (SABA) alone with SABA combined with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and with the fast-onset, long-acting β agonist formoterol combined with ICS for asthma., Data Sources: The MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched from January 1, 2020, to September 27, 2024, without language restrictions., Study Selection: Pairs of reviewers independently selected randomized clinical trials evaluating (1) SABA alone, (2) ICS with formoterol, and (3) ICS with SABA (combined or separate inhalers)., Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Random-effects meta-analyses synthesized outcomes. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence., Main Outcomes and Measures: Asthma symptom control (5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire; range, 0-6, lower scores indicate better asthma control; minimum important difference [MID], 0.5 points), asthma-related quality of life (Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire; range, 1-7, higher scores indicate better quality of life; MID, 0.5 points), risk of severe exacerbations, and risk of serious adverse events., Results: A total of 27 randomized clinical trials (N = 50 496 adult and pediatric patients; mean age, 41.0 years; 20 288 male [40%]) were included. Compared with SABA alone, both ICS-containing relievers were associated with fewer severe exacerbations (ICS-formoterol risk ratio [RR], 0.65 [95% CI, 0.60-0.72]; risk difference [RD], -10.3% [95% CI, -11.8% to -8.3%]; ICS-SABA RR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.73-0.95]; RD, -4.7% [95% CI, -8.0% to -1.5%]) with high certainty. Compared with SABA alone, both ICS-containing relievers were associated with improved asthma control (ICS-formoterol RR improvement [MID] in total score, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.04-1.10]; RD, 4.1% [95% CI, 2.3%-5.9%]; ICS-SABA RR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.03-1.15]; RD, 5.4% [95% CI, 1.8%-8.5%]) with high certainty. In an indirect comparison with ICS-SABA, ICS-formoterol was associated with fewer severe exacerbations (RR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.66-0.92]; RD, -5.5% [95% CI, -8.4% to -2.0%]) with moderate certainty. Compared with SABA alone, ICS-formoterol (RD, -0.6% [95% CI, -1.3% to 0%]) was not associated with increased risk of serious adverse events (high certainty) and ICS-SABA (RD, 0% [95% CI, -1.1% to 1.2%]) was not associated with increased risk of serious adverse events (moderate certainty)., Conclusions and Relevance: In this network meta-analysis of patients with asthma, ICS combined with formoterol and ICS combined with SABA were each associated with reduced asthma exacerbations and improved asthma control compared with SABA alone.

Rationale: In asthma, sputum group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) are activated within 7 hours after allergen challenge. Neuroimmune interactions mediate rapid host responses at mucosal interfaces. In murine models of asthma, lung ILC2s colocalize to sensory neuronal termini expressing the neuropeptide neuromedin U (NMU), which stimulates type 2 (T2) cytokine secretion by ILC2s, with additive effects to alarmins in vitro . Objectives: To investigate the effect of the NMU/NMUR1 (NMU receptor 1) axis on early activation of ILC2s in asthma. Methods: Subjects with mild asthma ( n  = 8) were enrolled in a diluent-controlled allergen inhalation challenge study. Sputum ILC2 expression of NMUR1 and T2 cytokines was enumerated by flow cytometry, and airway NMU levels were assessed by ELISA. This was compared with samples from subjects with moderate to severe asthma ( n  = 9). Flow sort-purified and ex vivo -expanded ILC2s were used for functional assays and transcriptomic analyses. Measurements and Main Results: Significant increases in sputum ILC2s expressing NMUR1 were detected 7 hours after allergen versus diluent challenge whereby the majority of NMUR1 + ILC2s expressed IL-5/IL-13. Sputum NMUR1 + ILC2 counts were significantly greater in mild versus moderate to severe asthma, and NMUR1 + ILC2s correlated inversely with the dose of inhaled corticosteroid in the latter group. Coculturing with alarmins upregulated NMUR1 in ILC2s, which was attenuated by dexamethasone. NMU-stimulated T2 cytokine expression by ILC2s, maximal at 6 hours, was abrogated by dexamethasone or specific signaling inhibitors for mitogen-activated protein kinase 1/2 and phosphoinositol 3-kinase but not the IL-33 signaling moiety MyD88 in vitro . Conclusions: The NMU/NMUR1 axis stimulates rapid effects on ILC2s and may be an important early activator of these cells in eosinophilic inflammatory responses in asthma.

Background: Benralizumab induces rapid and near-complete depletion of eosinophils from blood and lung tissue. We investigated whether benralizumab could attenuate the allergen-induced late asthmatic response (LAR) in participants with allergic asthma., Methods: Participants with allergic asthma who demonstrated increased sputum eosinophils and LAR at screening were randomised to benralizumab 30 mg or matched placebo given every 4 weeks for 8 weeks (3 doses). Allergen challenges were performed at weeks 9 and 12 when blood, sputum, bone marrow and bronchial tissue eosinophils and LAR were assessed., Results: 46 participants (mean age 30.9 years) were randomised to benralizumab (n=23) or placebo (n=23). Eosinophils were significantly reduced in the benralizumab group compared with placebo in blood at 4 weeks and sputum and bone marrow at 9 weeks after treatment initiation. At 7 h after an allergen challenge at week 9, sputum eosinophilia was significantly attenuated in the benralizumab group compared to placebo (least squares mean difference -5.81%, 95% CI -10.69- -0.94%; p=0.021); however, the LAR was not significantly different (least squares mean difference 2.54%, 95% CI 3.05-8.12%; p=0.363). Adverse events were reported for seven (30.4%) and 14 (60.9%) participants in the benralizumab and placebo groups, respectively., Conclusion: Benralizumab administration over 8 weeks resulted in a significant attenuation of blood, bone marrow and sputum eosinophilia in participants with mild allergic asthma; however, there was no change in the LAR, suggesting that eosinophils alone are not a key component of allergen-induced bronchoconstriction., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: G.M. Gauvreau reports support for the present manuscript from AstraZeneca, grants from AstraZeneca, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, and receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts or other services from AstraZeneca. R. Sehmi reports support for the present study from AstraZeneca. R. Leigh reports support for the present study from AstraZeneca, and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca. D.W. Cockcroft reports support for the present manuscript from AstraZeneca, and grants from SHRF, Biohaven, AllerGen, University of Saskatchewan College of Medicine and CIHR. I. Mayers reports grants from AstraZeneca Canada and Boehringer Ingelheim, consultancy fees from Sanofi Canada and AstraZeneca, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, and payment for expert testimony from Alberta Justice. L-P. Boulet reports grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis and Sanofi-Regeneron, royalties or licences from UptoDate and Taylor & Francis, consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck and Sanofi-Regeneron, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Merck and Sanofi, and leadership role as Past-Chair of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Board of Directors, Past President of the Global Asthma Organisation (Interasma), Past Member of the Canadian Thoracic Society Respiratory Guidelines Committee and Past Laval University Chair on Knowledge Transfer, Prevention and Education in Respiratory and Cardiovascular Health. T. Ho reports grants from Fisher & Paykel, consultancy fees from Valeo and AstraZeneca, and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline. I. Satia reports grants from Merck, GlaxoSmithKline and Bellus, consultancy fees from Merck, Genentech, Respiplus and GlaxoSmithKline/Bellus, and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca and Sanofi. P.D. Mitchell reports grants from Teva, consultancy fees from Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline, and support for attending meetings from AstraZeneca. I.P. Magee reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from GlaxoSmithKline. C. Bergeron reports support for the present study from AstraZeneca, grants from AstraZeneca, Sanofi and Regeneron, consultancy fees from ValeoPharma, Sanofi, AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline, and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, ValeoPharma, Sanofi and Grifols. M. Bhutani reports grants from CIHR, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca and Sanofi, consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Covis and Valeo, and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi and Covis. V. Werkström was an employee of AstraZeneca at the time of the study and reports stock or stock options in AstraZeneca. T. Durżyński was an employee of AstraZeneca at the time of the study and reports stock or stock options in AstraZeneca. K. Shoemaker was an employee of AstraZeneca at the time of the study and reports stock or stock options in AstraZeneca. R.K. Katial was an employee of AstraZeneca at the time of the study and reports personal fees from AstraZeneca. M. Jison was an employee of AstraZeneca at the time of the study and reports stock or stock options in AstraZeneca. C. McCrae was an employee of AstraZeneca at the time of the study and reports stock or stock options in AstraZeneca. P.M. O'Byrne reports support for the present study from AstraZeneca, grants from AstraZeneca, Merck and Biohaven, consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Sage, Teva and Affibody, and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline and Covis. The remaining authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright ©The authors 2024.)