Search

Highlights: – GE can be embraced by distinct populations with highly religious views. – UOSTs' motivation toward GE is related to competitive-instrumental, social-justice, and personal factors. – UOSTs prioritize local orientation toward GE, over global perspectives. – UOSTs seem to assess the compatibility of GE with the traditions and norms of their own community. – GE may be perceived as multidirectional and multidimensional rather than a top-down hierarchy Purpose: This study aims to identify factors that motivate ultra-Orthodox female student-teachers to learn and teach from a global education perspective. Uncovering these factors may inform the discourse on integrating global orientations into education systems. Design/methodology/approach: The study adopts the broad theoretical idea of global education while employing quantitative analysis. Findings: Data obtained from 115 participants yielded three factors salient to learning GE: (1) competitive-instrumental; (2) social-justice related; and (3) personal. Motivation to teach GE was found to align with two main approaches, one locally oriented and the other globally oriented. Research limitations/implications: As the study adopted a quantitative methodology, future research should also elucidate our findings using qualitative methods. Practical implications: Stakeholders who wish to promote global education should consider that the participants’ overall disposition is congenial to global education; however, they interpret this notion in local and personal terms rather than as a global, proactive framework.

In the realm of education, discussions surrounding the concept of “visibility” typically concentrate on students and marginalized populations, often overlooking highly positioned individuals, such as leading teachers. This research delves into the fundamental importance of visibility in the transformative process of teacher professional development as leaders. It investigates its character among teacher leaders and the experience of being seen and scrutinizes its central role in shaping a cohesive professional identity. Over a two-year period, data were gathered from 42 leading teachers in elementary and high schools using a phenomenological approach. The findings reveal a paradox: despite the visibility of teachers in their communities, expressions of a lack of professional visibility persist in their continuing professional development (CPD). However, visibility is crucial for research participants, serving as a catalyst for shaping their professional identity. This identity formation involves four key processes: recognizing one’s developmental journey, reflecting on professional experiences within a timeframe, fostering introspection, and reconstructing identity based on reflection outcomes. This iterative process signifies continuous evolution and analysis.

Heutagogy and blended learning (BL) are core concepts in the educational discourse post-COVID-19. Conducting a mixed-methods study, we investigate meeting points between heutagogy principles and BL in the context of curricular change in the academic timetable of teacher education college, where pre-COVID most courses have been taught face-to-face (F2F). At present, teacher educators and students meet F2F for three weeks, followed by a week of remote learning, combining synchronous and asynchronous pedagogies. Data have been collected by a closed-ended questionnaire and two focus groups, involving altogether 76 lecturers and 553 students. Findings indicate that heutagogy has been applied in all facets of BL, rather than only with online or digital technological components. This study explores a bottom-up growth of heutagogy expressions in BL at three meeting points. When the core facets of heutagogy principles have been identified, there has been a predominance of the students’ agency and life-long learners, together with facets such as a non-linear learning and capability development that have been underrepresented. This study contributes to the research field of heutagogy in teacher education as it identifies the meaning and the way a structural change in the curriculum can constitute an accelerator and catalyst when implementing heutagogy in practice.

This study investigates a post-COVID-19 curricular change in the blended learning (BL) academic timetable of a teacher education college where, pre-COVID-19, most academic courses were taught face-to-face (F2F) on campus. At present, the meetings are F2F for three weeks, followed by a week of remote learning, combining synchronous and asynchronous pedagogies. This study explores these two aspects of the online component and the considerations for their implementation. In a mixed-method approach, the data were collected using a closed questionnaire and two focus groups involving 76 lecturers and 553 students altogether. Of the wide range of pedagogies identified, the highest success rating was accorded to synchronous frontal lectures via Zoom by the students and to integrating MOOCs, YouTube, and Podcasts by the lecturers. Moreover, compared to the lecturers, the students rated the success of asynchronous self-directed learning considerably higher. Qualitative analysis revealed that pedagogies slated for the online module were frequently negotiated between students and teachers. Findings suggest that a structural change in the curriculum could be a first step in rethinking pedagogies in the post-COVID-19 education arena. The next step should focus on narrowing the gap between lecturers’ and students’ perceptions regarding the success of the various pedagogies.

The study aims to explore the extent of satisfaction of 76 teacher educators (TEs) and 553 student teachers (STs) with new blended learning (BL) curricular-structural change titled "1 of 4." Quantitative analysis revealed that both the TEs and the STs had a positive opinion regarding this structural change and recommended adopting it for future learning. However, significant differences between the TEs and STs were related to the cons: creating overwork and harming sequential learning. TEs' and STs' recommendations for improvement revealed that the TEs and STs mainly expressed traditional dispositions regarding their roles and their expectations from the new BL timetable. The main conclusion posits that structural change is crucial, but it may only act as the first step in redesigning teacher preparation for the post-COVID-19 era.

The article discusses the role of the different forms of capital within the patterns of relationships between kindergarten teachers (KTs) and parents in kindergartens located in one medium-high socioeconomic status neighborhood in Israel. The qualitative analysis conducted reveals how the parents' cultural capital serves as a resource to advance the kindergarten in functioning and marketing, and for the KTs, to improve trust, cope with solitude, and receive parents' feedback. The benefits for parents include furthering their children's educational progress and enhancing their well-being, dealing with the municipal bureaucracy, and controlling the kindergarten's operation. At the same time, it was found that capital resources may generate costs. For KTs, these may stem from parents' interfering, crossing boundaries, and bullying, and cause KTs to placate the parents; for the parents, the costs may come in the form of anxiety about their children's well-being.