Search

Introduction: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors are indicated in the first-line treatment of hormonal receptor positive and HER-2 negative (HR+/HER2- negative) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Although phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) proved their clinical efficacy, they can increase healthcare expenditure. To date, there are no observational studies to validate the clinical findings of the existed RCTs. In addition, only a few pharmacoeconomic evaluations were published regarding the two common CDK4/6 inhibiting agents, palbociclib and ribociclib to evaluate their financial burden. Objectives: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of palbociclib and ribociclib in the local settings in Qatar. Moreover, to conduct a thorough pharmacoeconomic analysis for the two medications and compare them in terms of their cost-effectiveness and cost-utility. Methodology: A retrospective observational study on HR+/HER-2 negative stage IV breast cancer patients receiving palbociclib or ribociclib in Qatar was conducted, followed by a comparative pharmacoeconomic analysis. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall-survival (OS). Safety profiles of both medications were also evaluated. Clinical data of all MBC in Qatar were collected from the National Center for Cancer Care and Research (NCCCR) from January 2017 to December 2019 using Cerner ® system. To evaluate the long-term costs-effectiveness, a 10-year within-cycle corrected Markov’s model was developed. The Markov’s model consisted of three main health states: progression-free (PFS), progressed disease (PD), and death. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) were generated and compared to a three gross-domestic-product (3 GDP) per capita. Model costs were obtained from the department of accounting and finance in the NCCCR, transition probabilities were calculated from individual patient data obtained in the clinical phase, and utilities were summarized from the published literature. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out. Modeling was conducted via TreeAge Pro ® software. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between palbociclib and ribociclib in PFS; median PFS time was 17.85 versus 13.55 months respectively; p> 0.05. Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in OS (29.82 versus 31.72 months; p>0.05). For the pharmacoeconomic analysis, ribociclib dominated palbociclib in yielding an ICER of - 83,090.88 QAR per life-year gained, and ICUR of -31,868.06 QAR per quality-adjusted life-year gained. The results remained robust in all cases of the deterministic sensitivity analyses suggesting ribociclib is more cost-effective than palbociclib. Taking all combined uncertainties into account, the overall confidence in the base-case conclusion was around 60%. Conclusions: Both treatment strategies have similar efficacy and safety profiles. Nonetheless, ribociclib is a more cost-effective option than palbociclib based on the base-case results and based on the addressed uncertainties related to the model inputs. Citation Format: Nour Hisham Al-Ziftawi, Shereen Elazzazy, Mohammed Fasihul Alam, Asrul Akmal Shafie, Anas Hamad, Salha Bujassoum, Mohamed Izham Ibrahim. Clinical and pharmacoeconomic analyses of CDK4/6 inhibitors use in stage IV breast cancer females in the state of Qatar: A comparative retrospective observational study with cost effectiveness and cost utility analyses [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-16-03.

Palbociclib and ribociclib are indicated in the first-line treatment of hormonal-receptor-positive HER-2 negative (HR+/HER-2 negative) advanced breast cancer. Despite their clinical benefit, they can increase healthcare expenditure. Yet, there are no comparative pharmacoeconomic evaluations for them in developing countries, the Middle East, or Gulf countries. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of palbociclib and ribociclib in Qatar. A 10-year within-cycle-corrected Markov’s model was developed using TreeAge Pro® software. The model consisted of three main health states: progression-free (PFS), progressed-disease (PD), and death. Costs were obtained from the actual hospital settings, transition probabilities were calculated from individual-patient data, and utilities were summarized from the published literature. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) were calculated and compared to three gross-domestic-products per capita. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Ribociclib dominated palbociclib in terms of costs, life-years gained, and quality-adjusted life-years gained. The conclusions remained robust in the different cases of the deterministic sensitivity analyses. Taking all combined uncertainties into account, the confidence in the base-case conclusion was approximately 60%. Therefore, in HR+/HER-2 negative stage IV breast cancer patients, the use of ribociclib is considered cost-saving compared to palbociclib.

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation is important for breast-cancer medications due to their high costs. To our knowledge, no systematic literature reviews of pharmacoeconomic studies for breast-cancer medication use are present in developing-countries.To systematically review the existing cost-effectiveness evaluations of breast-cancer medication in developing-countries.A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and EconLit. Two researchers determined the final articles, extracted data, and evaluated their quality using the Quality of Health-Economic Studies (QHES) tool. The interclass-correlation-coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess interrater-reliability. Data were summarized descriptively.Fourteen pharmacoeconomic studies published from 2009 to 2019 were included. Thirteen used patient-life-years as their effectiveness unit, of which 10 used quality-adjusted life-years. Most of the evaluations focused on trastuzumab as a single agent or on regimens containing trastuzumab (n = 10). The conclusion of cost-effectiveness analysis varied among the studies. All the studies were of high quality (QHES score75). Interrater reliability between the two reviewers was high (ICC = 0.76).In many studies included in the review, the use of breast-cancer drugs in developing countries was not cost-effective. Yet, more pharmacoeconomic evaluations for the use of recently approved agents in different disease stages are needed in developing countries.

Objectives:The aim of this study is to assess the knowledge (K), attitude (A), and readiness to practice (rP) levels regarding disaster medicine and preparedness among health profession students at Qatar University.Methods:A survey-based study was carried out to assess medical, pharmacy, and health sciences students’ KArP levels using pretested and validated questionnaire. Student’s t-test, analysis of variance, correlation, and linear regression were used with an alpha level of 0.05.Results:The difference in the mean KArP level between genders was not significant (P > 0.05). Students from the College of Health Sciences had significantly higher KArP levels than those from the College of Pharmacy (101.5 vs 90.0; P = 0.033). Overall, Qatari students had better knowledge, attitude, and readiness to practice scores and total KArP scores than non-Qatari students. Moreover, students who were born in Qatar also had better knowledge, attitude, and readiness to practice scores and total KArP scores than students who were born outside Qatar. Significant direct moderate correlations were found among the 3 KArP parameters (P < 0.001). Knowledge and attitudes were indicated to be significant predictors of readiness to practice (P < 0.001).Conclusions:Students from the health colleges at Qatar University have moderate disaster medicine preparedness