Search

Simple Summary: Cryoablation therapy is an emerging modality in the treatment of Barrett's esophagus. Our systematic review collected data on this technique to provide evidence of its efficacy and safety and to compare it with the established RFA. The results from twenty-three studies revealed that the complete eradication of dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia was comparable between RFA and cryoablation. More specifically, cryoablation achieved a complete eradication of dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia at rates of 84.2% (95%CI: 79.1–89.3) and 64.1% (95%CI: 49.2–79.0), respectively, whereas 8.3% (95%CI: 4.7–11.9) of cases presented with recurrence. Studies on cryoballoons seem to be more homogenous in terms of dysplasia treatment, complications, and, especially, strictures. Background: The mainstay approach in endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) for dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE) includes the endoscopic resection of visible lesions, accompanied by ablation of the residual metaplastic epithelium. Cryoablation therapy is one such emerging ablation technique in this field. This systematic review with a meta-analysis aims to accumulate pooled data on cryoablation performance in the treatment of patients with BE and to compare this technique to the standard of care radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Methods: The MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Scopus databases were searched until June 2024 for studies evaluating BE management using cryoablation for cumulative results. The primary outcome was the complete eradication of dysplasia (CED) and intestinal metaplasia (CEIM) in BE compared to RFA, while secondary outcomes included the respective pooled rates using cryoablation, recurrence, and adverse events, with a separate analysis for strictures. The meta-analyses were based on a random-effects model, and the results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses by type of cryoablation were also performed. Results: Twenty-three studies (1604 patients) were finally included, four of which were comparative. CED and CEIM did not differ significantly between cryoablation and RFA [OR= 0.95 (95%CI: 0.50–1.81) and OR = 0.57 (95%CI: 0.20–1.63), respectively)]. The pooled rates of CED, CEIM, and recurrence after cryoablation were 84.2% (95%CI: 79.1–89.3), 64.1% (95%CI: 49.2–79.0), and 8.3% (95%CI: 4.7–11.9), accompanied by high rates of heterogeneity. Adverse events were noted in 14.5% (95%CI: 9.9–19.2) of cases, and 6.5% (95%CI: 4.1–9.0) developed strictures. In the subgroup analysis, the cryoballoon achieved a reduction in heterogeneity in CED, adverse events, and stricture formation, whereas spray catheters provided homogenous results in terms of recurrence. Conclusions: Cryoablation provides equal outcomes compared to RFA in the treatment of patients with BE, with the cryoballoon achieving relatively homogenous rates of CED and adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy have been the standard of care for patients at high risk (HR) of lymph node metastasis following a diagnosis of early esophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) after endoscopic resection (ER). However, recent cohorts suggest lymph node metastasis risk is lower than initially estimated, suggesting organ preservation with close endoscopic follow-up is a viable option. We report on the 3- and 5-year risk of lymph node/distant metastasis among patients diagnosed with early HR-T1 OAC undergoing endoscopic follow-up. Patients diagnosed with HR-T1a or T1b OAC following ER at a tertiary referral center were identified and retrospectively analyzed from clinical records between 2010 and 2021. Patients were included if they underwent endoscopic follow-up after resection and were divided into HR-T1a, low risk (LR)-T1b and HR-T1b cohorts. After ER, 47 patients underwent endoscopic follow-up for early HR OAC. In total, 39 patients had an R0 resection with a combined 3- and 5-year risk of LN/distant metastasis of 6.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.8–25] and 10.9% (95% CI, 3.6–30.2%), respectively. There was no significant difference when stratifying by histopathological subtype (P  = 0.64). Among those without persistent luminal disease on follow-up, the 5-year risk was 4.1% (95% CI, 0.6–26.1). Two patients died secondary to OAC with an all-cause 5-year survival of 57.5% (95% CI, 39.5–71.9). The overall risk of LN/distant metastasis for early HR T1 OAC was lower than historically reported. Endoscopic surveillance can be a reasonable approach in highly selected patients with an R0 resection and complete luminal eradication, but clear, evidence-based surveillance guidelines are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article is a systematic review and meta-analysis that examines the success rates of different fixation techniques in preventing esophageal stent migration. The study analyzes various fixation techniques, including suturing and over-the-scope (OTS) clipping, and compares their effectiveness in preventing stent migration. The results of the analysis provide valuable insights into the performance of different fixation techniques and can inform clinical decision-making. The studies included in the analysis found that stent fixation significantly reduced the rate of stent migration compared to non-anchored stents, and the rates of adverse events were similar between the two groups. The study concludes that esophageal stent fixation is an effective treatment option for esophageal strictures, leaks, and fistulas, but more research is needed to determine the most appropriate technique. [Extracted from the article]