Search

At present, there is consensus that prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is effective to reduce cardiovascular events at the expense of bleeding complication events. A causal relationship of prolonged DAPT with an increase in mortality remains debatable, however, it appears to be obvious that bleeding complications are associated with an increase in cardiac events. Thus, individualized optimal DAPT duration balancing the risk and benefit of DAPT should be applied. In addition, strategy to minimize bleeding complications is highly recommended. Several risk scores have been reported to discriminate the risk and benefits of DAPT. However, in general, bleeding risk and event risk are correlated with each other, thus predictability of these scores is limited to moderate. Therefore, interpretation of previous trials is important to overcome the shortcome in outcomes. In this review, we provide an overview of DAPT trials and clarify the shortfalls to consider in Japan. Finally, possible future trends with reference to the results of recent clinical trials will be presented.

Background The aim of this study was to investigate whether drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment is effective for de novo coronary lesions that are unsuitable for drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.Methods and Results:This retrospective study included 118 de novo lesions that were not suitable for DES implantation. Of the lesions, 40% was treated because of very small vessel disease. Patients with planned non-cardiac surgery and at high bleeding risk were 3% and 19%, respectively, and lesions that easily develop stent fracture comprised 26%. Clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) was the primary endpoint. The rate of suboptimal lesion preparation before DCB treatment was set as the secondary endpoint. Optimal lesion preparation was defined as acquisition of Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade 3, minor coronary dissection, and residual stenosis ≤30%. The rate of suboptimal lesion preparation was 2.5% and 3 patients needed bail-out stenting. Accordingly, 115 patients were treated with a DCB. Clinically driven TLR had occurred in 8 patients (7.0%) at the 8-month follow-up. The presence of chronic total occlusion was identified as an independent predictor for TLR (odds 11.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-135.54; P=0.02). Conclusions For lesions that are unsuitable for stent implantation, stent-less intervention using a DCB should be considered initially. The present study also highlighted that lesion preparation is key to a successful DCB strategy.