Search

The induction of immunological responses that trigger bio-physiological symptoms in the respiratory tract following repeated exposure to a substance, is known as respiratory sensitization. The inducing compound is known as a respiratory sensitizer. While respiratory sensitization by high molecular weight (HMW) materials is recognized and extensively studied, much less information is available regarding low molecular weight (LMW) materials as respiratory sensitizers. Variability of symptoms presented in humans from such exposures, limited availability of (and access to) documented reports, and the absence of standardized and validated test models, hinders the identification of true respiratory sensitizers. This review aims to sort suspected LMW respiratory sensitizers based on available compelling, reasonable, inadequate, or questionable evidence in humans from occupational exposures and use this information to compose a reference list of reported chemical respiratory sensitizers for scientific research purposes. A list of 97 reported respiratory sensitizers was generated from six sources, and 52 LMW organic chemicals were identified, reviewed, and assigned to the four evidence categories. Less than 10 chemicals were confirmed with compelling evidence for induction of respiratory sensitization in humans from occupational exposures. Here, we propose the reference list for developing novel research on respiratory sensitization.

Use of botanicals and natural substances in consumer products has increased in recent years. Such extracts can contain protein that may theoretically represent a potential risk of IgE-mediated allergy. No method has yet been generally accepted or validated for assessment of the allergenic potential of proteins. For development of suitable methods datasets of allergenic and nonallergenic (or low allergenic) proteins are required that can serve, respectively, as positive and negative controls. However, data are unavailable on proteins that lack or have low allergenic potential. Here, low allergenic potential proteins are identified based on the assumption that proteins with established human exposure, but with a lack of an association with allergy, possess low allergenic potential. Proteins were extracted from sources considered to have less allergenic potential (corn, potato, spinach, rice, and tomato) as well as higher allergenic potential (wheat) regarding common allergenic foods. Proteins were identified and semi-quantified by label-free proteomic analysis conducted using mass spectrometry. Predicted allergenicity was determined using AllerCatPro (https://allercatpro.bii.a-star.edu.sg/). In summary, 9077 proteins were identified and semi-quantified from 6 protein sources. Within the top 10% of the most abundant proteins identified, 178 characterized proteins were found to have no evidence for allergenicity predicted by AllerCatPro and were considered to have low allergenic potential. This panel of low allergenic potential proteins provides a pragmatic approach to aid the development of alternative methods for robust testing strategies to distinguish between proteins of high and low allergenic potential to assess the risk of proteins from natural or botanical sources.

Motivation Due to the risk of inducing an immediate Type I (IgE-mediated) allergic response, proteins intended for use in consumer products must be investigated for their allergenic potential before introduction into the marketplace. The FAO/WHO guidelines for computational assessment of allergenic potential of proteins based on short peptide hits and linear sequence window identity thresholds misclassify many proteins as allergens. Results We developed AllerCatPro which predicts the allergenic potential of proteins based on similarity of their 3D protein structure as well as their amino acid sequence compared with a data set of known protein allergens comprising of 4180 unique allergenic protein sequences derived from the union of the major databases Food Allergy Research and Resource Program, Comprehensive Protein Allergen Resource, WHO/International Union of Immunological Societies, UniProtKB and Allergome. We extended the hexamer hit rule by removing peptides with high probability of random occurrence measured by sequence entropy as well as requiring 3 or more hexamer hits consistent with natural linear epitope patterns in known allergens. This is complemented with a Gluten-like repeat pattern detection. We also switched from a linear sequence window similarity to a B-cell epitope-like 3D surface similarity window which became possible through extensive 3D structure modeling covering the majority (74%) of allergens. In case no structure similarity is found, the decision workflow reverts to the old linear sequence window rule. The overall accuracy of AllerCatPro is 84% compared with other current methods which range from 51 to 73%. Both the FAO/WHO rules and AllerCatPro achieve highest sensitivity but AllerCatPro provides a 37-fold increase in specificity. Availability and implementation https://allercatpro.bii.a-star.edu.sg/ Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Interest in the development of methods to evaluate the respiratory sensitization potential of low-molecular weight chemicals continues, but no method has yet been generally accepted or validated. A lack of chemical reference standards, together with uncertainty regarding relevant immunological mechanisms, has hampered method development. The first key event in the development of either skin or respiratory sensitization is the formation of stable adducts of the chemical with host proteins. This event is measured in the Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay using cysteine- and lysine-containing model peptides. It is hypothesized that protein reactivity and subsequent adduct formation may represent the earliest point of divergence in the pathways leading to either skin or respiratory sensitization. Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay data for 200 chemicals were compiled and grouped into respiratory, skin and nonsensitizers. Chemicals grouping was based on extensive literature research and expert judgment. To evaluate if chemical groups represent different peptide reactivity profiles, peptide reactivity data were clustered and compared with information on protein binding mechanisms and chemical categories available via the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Toolbox. Respiratory sensitizers (n = 15) showed a significant (3-fold) higher lysine reactivity than skin sensitizers (n = 129). However, this difference was driven largely by the high representation of acid anhydrides among the respiratory sensitizers that showed clear lysine selectivity. Collectively, these data suggest that preferential reactivity for either cysteine or lysine is associated primarily with chemical structure, and that lysine preference is not a unifying characteristic of chemical respiratory allergens.

The use of proteins and protein-containing materials in a variety of industrial and commercial products is increasing, with applications in pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals and consumer and personal care products. As a consequence there is a need to ensure potential and environmental risks are understood. One important requirement is an appreciation of the ability of proteins to induce allergic sensitization and allergic disease. However, there is currently no clear guidance for determination of whether or not to accept a new protein in a product based on potential allergenicity. A key requirement for effective risk assessment in this respect is an understanding of sensitizing potency. Here we describe issues and challenges associated with measurement of allergenic potency and explore emerging opportunities and possible ways forward. Effective assessment of the risk of allergy demands not only information about the likely conditions of exposure, but also an understanding of the sensitizing potency of protein allergens. For the purposes of this article sensitizing potency can be viewed as being the ease with which, and the concentration at which, proteins will induce sensitization in a previously non-sensitized subject. The immunological bases of protein allergy are summarized, and the properties that confer on proteins the ability to induce allergic sensitization are considered prior to a detailed exploration of the issues that have to be addressed for evaluation of sensitizing potency. Included among the important considerations are: the impact of route of exposure, identification of relevant dose metrics, and the requirement for reference standards. Finally, new and emerging opportunities to evaluate the sensitizing potency of allergenic proteins are reviewed, including the use of in silico modeling.

The monoterpene ascaridole, a fairly stable endoperoxide found in essential oils such as tea tree oil can provoke allergic contact dermatitis which has been evidenced under patch test conditions. However, concomitantly we observed irritative skin reactions that demand further data underlining the sensitization potential of ascaridole. Here, we studied the effects of ascaridole on dendritic cell (DC) activation and protein reactivity, 2 key steps of chemical-induced skin sensitization. Treatment of human monocyte-derived DC with ascaridole found support for full DC maturation, a capability of sensitizers but not irritants. It induced significant upregulation of the expression of the costimulatory molecules CD86, CD80, CD40, and the adhesion molecule CD54 in a time-dependent manner. Maturation was accompanied by release of proinflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-1ß, tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-6, and IL-8. Similar to other chemical skin sensitizers including hydroperoxides, we observed a certain reactivity of ascaridole toward cysteine- but not lysine-containing peptides. During recent years, evidence accumulated for a radical mechanism as trigger for protein reactivity of peroxides. Treatment of the fairly stable endoperoxide ascaridole with iron as radical inducer ("activated ascaridole") resulted in cysteine peptide reactivity exceeding by far that of ascaridole itself. Furthermore, activated ascaridole showed increased potential for induction of the Nrf2 target gene heme oxygenase 1 and upregulation of CD86 and CD54 on THP-1 cells, an established DC surrogate. These results indicate that radical formation could be involved in the steps leading to skin sensitization induced by the endoperoxide ascaridole.