Search

Non-road emission regulations are becoming increasingly rigorous, which makes it necessary for non-road engines to adopt aftertreatment systems. The commonly used aftertreatments mainly include diesel oxidation catalytic (DOC), diesel particulate filter (DPF), particle oxidation catalyst (POC), selective catalytic reduction (SCR) and ammonia purification catalyst (ASC). The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of using an integrated system (DOC + DPF/POC + SCR + ASC) on non-road diesel engine emissions under steady-state and transient operating conditions, respectively. The major works are the comparison between POC and DPF from the viewpoint of emission reduction. The results show that both POC and DPF can effectively reduce particulate matter (PM) and nitrogen oxide (NOX) emissions under steady-state conditions, and DPF has better purification effect than POC, especially for PM. The PM conversion rate of DPF is up to 87%, while that of POC is only 60% under the non-road steady-state test cycle (NRSC). Both NOX and hydrocarbon (HC) conversion rates are high, exceeding 95%. The conversions of PM, NOX, HC, and carbon monoxide (CO) of DPF in the non-road transient test cycle (NRTC) are 92.83%, 96.99%, 96.86% and 81.45%, respectively, while those of POC are 60.12%, 95.45%, 92.82% and 79.51%, respectively. Both the POC and DPF systems can meet the emission regulation limits. As a result, POC has the potential to substitute DPF in non-road engines due to its lower product and maintenance costs. We hope that the comparison study will provide useful guidance for improving the emissions performance of non-road diesel engines.

Non-road emission regulations are becoming increasingly rigorous, which makes it necessary for non-road engines to adopt aftertreatment systems. The commonly used aftertreatments mainly include diesel oxidation catalytic (DOC), diesel particulate filter (DPF), particle oxidation catalyst (POC), selective catalytic reduction (SCR) and ammonia purification catalyst (ASC). The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of using an integrated system (DOC + DPF/POC + SCR + ASC) on non-road diesel engine emissions under steady-state and transient operating conditions, respectively. The major works are the comparison between POC and DPF from the viewpoint of emission reduction. The results show that both POC and DPF can effectively reduce particulate matter (PM) and nitrogen oxide (NO X) emissions under steady-state conditions, and DPF has better purification effect than POC, especially for PM. The PM conversion rate of DPF is up to 87%, while that of POC is only 60% under the non-road steady-state test cycle (NRSC). Both NO X and hydrocarbon (HC) conversion rates are high, exceeding 95%. The conversions of PM, NO X , HC, and carbon monoxide (CO) of DPF in the non-road transient test cycle (NRTC) are 92.83%, 96.99%, 96.86% and 81.45%, respectively, while those of POC are 60.12%, 95.45%, 92.82% and 79.51%, respectively. Both the POC and DPF systems can meet the emission regulation limits. As a result, POC has the potential to substitute DPF in non-road engines due to its lower product and maintenance costs. We hope that the comparison study will provide useful guidance for improving the emissions performance of non-road diesel engines. • Alternate outlet plugging POC and both inlet and outlet alternate plugging DPF were used. • Comparative study of POC and DPF aftertreatment systems was performed at various working conditions. • Transient exhaust state and emissions are analyzed in detail. • POC has the potential to replace DPF under current emission regulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]