Search

Background: Since 2000, the definition of myocardial infarction (MI) has evolved with reliance on cardiac troponin (cTn) tests. The implications of this change on trends of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) subtypes obtained from routinely collected hospital morbidity data are unclear. Using person-linked hospitalisation data, we compared International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-coded data with biomarker-classified admission rates for ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI), non-STEMI (NSTEMI) and unstable angina (UA) in Western Australia (WA)., Methods: We used linked hospitalisation data from all WA tertiary hospitals to identify patients with a principal diagnosis of STEMI, NSTEMI or UA between 2002 and 2016. Linked biomarker results were classified as 'diagnostic' for MI according to established criteria. We calculated age-standardised and sex-standardised rates (ASSRs) for ICD-coded versus biomarker-classified admissions by ACS subtypes and estimated annual change in admissions using Poisson regression adjusting for age and sex., Results: There were 37 272 ACS admissions in 30 683 patients (64.2% male), and 96% of cases had linked biomarker data, predominantly conventional cTn at the start and high-sensitive cTn from late 2013. Despite lower ASSRs, trends in MI classified with a diagnostic biomarker were concordant with ICD-coded admissions rates for both STEMI and NSTEMI. Between 2002 and 2010, STEMI rates declined by 4.1% (95% CI 5.0%, 3.1%) and 3.4% (95% CI 4.6%, 2.3%) in ICD-coded and biomarker-classified admissions, respectively, and both plateaued thereafter. For NSTEMI between 2002 and 2010, the ICD-coded and biomarker-classified rates increased 8.0% per year (95% CI 7.2%, 8.9%) and 8.0% (95% CI 7.0%, 9.0%), respectively, and both subsequently declined. For UA, both ICD-coded and biomarker-classified UA admission rates declined in a steady and concordant manner between 2002 and 2016., Conclusions: The present study supports the validity of using administrative data to monitor population trends in ACS subtypes as they appear to generally reflect the redefinition of MI in the troponin era., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in Yogyakarta, Indonesia with respect to time to treatment, treatment pattern and treatment outcome., Design: This is a retrospective cohort study in which medical records of hospitalised patients with ACS were reviewed., Setting: Three hospitals in Yogyakarta, Indonesia., Participants: Patients hospitalised with ACS during two pandemic periods (first pandemic period: March-August 2020; second pandemic period: March-August 2021) and prepandemic period (March-August 2019)., Outcome Measures: Time to treatment, treatment pattern and treatment outcome., Results: A total of 598 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 615 with non-ST-elevation ACS were identified. Of these, 313, 484 and 416 were identified during the prepandemic period, first pandemic period and second pandemic period, respectively. For STEMI, the proportion of patients with a delay from symptom onset to first medical contact (FMC) was significantly higher during the second pandemic period as compared with the prepandemic period (47.7% vs 32.0%, OR=1.84, 95% CI 1.18, 2.85). The proportion of patients with STEMI with delayed door-to-balloon (D2B) time was significantly higher during the second pandemic period as compared with the prepandemic period (99.4% vs 92.9%, OR=13.08, 95% CI 1.57, 108.73). Significantly longer mean total ischaemic time (45.85 hours vs 30.29 hours, mean difference=14.56, 95% CI 1.85, 27.28) was observed among patients with STEMI during the second year of the pandemic as compared with the prepandemic period. No significant differences between the prepandemic period and the first pandemic period were found in terms of proportion of patients with STEMI with a delay in time from symptom onset to FMC, delayed D2B time and total ischaemic time. Only Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score (OR=1.04, 95% CI 1.03, 1.05) was a significant predictor of in-hospital mortality in the multivariate analysis., Conclusions: This study suggests a significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on time to treatment among patients with ACS. Health systems need to be well prepared to support effective and timely treatment of patients with ACS during future crisis., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Previous studies of the incidence and case fatality of acute myocardial infarction in Norway are based on administrative data that do not distinguish between myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation (STEMI) and without ST segment elevation (NSTEMI). The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence, case fatality and patient characteristics for different types of myocardial infarction in the period 2013-2021., Material and Method: The Norwegian Myocardial Infarction Registry, the Norwegian Patient Registry and the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry were linked in order to identify all patients with myocardial infarction. We calculated age-adjusted incidence and 30-day case fatality., Results: Incidence of all types of myocardial infarction in total fell by 3.8 % per year on average (95 % CI 3.6-4.1). There was a reduction of 2.3 % (95 % CI 1.8-2.8) for STEMI, 3.1 % (95 % CI 2.8-3.4) for NSTEMI, and 6.5 % (95 % CI 5.9-7.1) for out-of-hospital deaths from myocardial infarction. Thirty-day case fatality for all types of myocardial infarction in total was 21.3 % in 2013 and 17.5 % in 2021. Case fatality for all infarctions fell by an average of 2.8 % per year (95 % CI 2.3-3.3), case fatality for NSTEMI fell by 4.4 % per year (95 % CI 3.3-5.5) per year, while case fatality for STEMI was unchanged., Interpretation: Incidence of all types of myocardial infarction declined in the period 2013-2021. Thirty-day case fatality remains high, despite a fall in case fatality for all myocardial infarctions in total and for NSTEMI. There was no change in case fatality for STEMI.

The relationship between weather and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) incidence has been the subject of considerable research, with varying conclusions. Harnessing machine learning techniques, our study explores the relationship between meteorological factors and ACS presentations in the emergency department (ED), offering insights into seasonal variations and inter-day fluctuations to optimize patient care and resource allocation. A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted, encompassing ACS presentations to Dutch EDs from 2010 to 2017. Temporal patterns were analyzed using heat-maps and time series plots. Multivariable linear regression (MLR) and Random Forest (RF) regression models were employed to forecast daily ACS presentations with prediction horizons of one, three, seven, and thirty days. Model performance was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R²), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). The study included 214,953 ACS presentations, predominantly unstable angina (UA) (94,272; 44%), non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (78,963; 37%), and ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) (41,718; 19%). A decline in daily ACS admissions over time was observed, with notable inter-day (estimated median difference: 41 (95%CI = 37-43, p = < 0.001) and seasonal variations (estimated median difference: 9 (95%CI 6-12, p = < 0.001). Both MLR and RF models demonstrated similar predictive capabilities, with MLR slightly outperforming RF. The models showed moderate explanatory power for ACS incidence (adjusted R² = 0.66; MAE (MAPE): 7.8 (11%)), with varying performance across subdiagnoses. Prediction of UA incidence resulted in the best-explained variability (adjusted R² = 0.80; MAE (MAPE): 5.3 (19.1%)), followed by NSTEMI and STEMI diagnoses. All models maintained consistent performance over extended prediction horizons. Our findings indicate that ACS presentation exhibits distinctive seasonal changes and inter-day differences, with marked reductions in incidence during the summer months and a distinct peak prevalence on Mondays. The predictive performance of our model was moderate. Nonetheless, we obtained good explanatory power for UA presentations. Our model emerges as a potentially valuable supplementary tool to enhance ED resource allocation or future predictive models predicting ACS incidence in the ED., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Current guidelines highlight a paucity of evidence guiding optimal timing for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in high-risk and non-high-risk cases., Aim: We assessed long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in NSTEMI patients undergoing early (<24 h) versus delayed (>24 h) coronary angiography at 6 years. Secondary end-points included all-cause mortality and cumulative MACE outcomes., Methods: Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were assessed among 355 patients presenting to a tertiary regional hospital between 2017 and 2018. Cox proportional hazard models were generated for MACE and all-cause mortality outcomes, adjusting for the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score, patient demographics, biomarkers and comorbidities., Results: Two hundred and seventy patients were included; 147 (54.4%) and 123 (45.6%) underwent early and delayed coronary angiography respectively. Median time to coronary angiography was 13.3 and 45.4 h respectively. At 6 years, 103 patients (38.1%) experienced MACE; 41 in the early group and 62 in the delayed group (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.23; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.50-3.31). After multivariable adjustment, the delayed group had higher rates of MACE (HR = 1.79; 95% CI = 1.19-2.70), all-cause mortality (HR = 2.76; 95% CI = 1.36-5.63) and cumulative MACE (incidence rate ratio = 1.54; 95% CI = 1.12-2.11). Subgroup analysis of MACE outcomes in rural and weekend NSTEMI presentations was not significant between early and delayed coronary angiography (HR = 1.49; 95% CI = 0.83-2.62)., Conclusion: Higher MACE rates in the delayed intervention group suggest further investigation is needed. Randomised control trials would be well suited to assess the role of early invasive intervention across all NSTEMI risk groups., (© 2024 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)

Background: The occurrence of transient myocardial ischemia (TMI) is an important pathology in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), yet studies are scarce regarding when TMI occurs during hospitalization, particularly in relation to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). This study examined: (1) TMI before or after ICA; (2) patient characteristics and ischemic burden by TMI group (before or after ICA); and (3) major in-hospital complications (transfer to critical care, death) and length of stay by TMI group (before or after ICA)., Methods: Secondary data analysis in hospitalized NSTE-ACS patients with TMI event(s) identified from 12-lead electrocardiographic Holter. Patient records were reviewed to assess ischemic burden [TMI time (min) ÷ hours recording duration], outcomes, and TMI timing, before or after ICA., Results: In 38 patients, 3 (8%) had TMI before and after ICA. Of the remaining 35 patients (92%), TMI occurred before ICA (16; 46%), and after ICA (9; 26%), and 10 (28%) did not have ICA. Patient characteristics, untoward outcomes, and TMI duration (minutes) did not differ by group. Ischemic burden was higher in patients with TMI after ICA (7.29 ± 8.82 min/h) compared to before ICA (2.54 ± 2.11 min/h), P = 0.039. Hospital length of stay by TMI group was 113 ± 113 (before), 226 ± 244 (after), and 85 ± 65 hours (no ICA); P = 0.172., Conclusions: Almost half of the sample had TMI before ICA; one-third had TMI but did not have ICA. Patients with TMI after an ICA had a higher ischemic burden. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to investigate further the short- and long-term clinical significance of TMI among NSTE-ACS patients., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The clinical governance of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has markedly changed in the last few years. We sought to assess the contemporary in-hospital management patterns of patients with AMI at a country level., Methods: EYESHOT (EmploYEd antithrombotic therapies in patients with acute coronary Syndromes HOspitalized in iTalian cardiac care units)-2 was a nationwide, prospective registry aimed to evaluate the current management of patients admitted to intensive cardiac care units (CCUs) for an AMI in Italy., Results: Over a 4-week period (February 1st-29th, 2024), 183 CCUs enrolled 2806 consecutive patients: 52.6 % with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and 47.4 % with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The median time from hospital admission to angiography in NSTEMI was 22.3 h (IQR 10.9-46.1), while for STEMI was 1.1 h (IQR 0.5-2.2) with significant difference between hospitals with and without catheterization laboratories. In both NSTEMI and STEMI patients, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was the preferred management strategy (73.3 % and 94.2 %, respectively). An optimal secondary prevention therapy, including dual antiplatelet therapy, inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system, a beta-blocker and a high-intensity statin was prescribed at discharge in more than 75 % of patients with AMI. In-hospital major bleedings occurred in 2.0 % and 2.3 % (p = 0.58), while death in 1.8 % and 2.8 % (p = 0.09) of NSTEMI and STEMI patients, respectively., Conclusions: The EYESHOT-2 registry shows the current management strategies and outcome of AMI patients admitted to Italian CCUs and provides insights to improve the clinical care of such patients., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www., Clinicaltrials: gov. Unique identifier: NCT06316128., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest LDL received honoraria for advisory boards or as speaker/chairman at scientific congresses from the following companies: Amgen, Aspen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Daiichi Sankyo, Menarini, Novonordisk, Pfizer/Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sanofi and Servier. APM received personal fees for participation in study committees sponsored by Bayer, AstraZeneca, Novartis and Sanofi, outside the present work. SL received honoraria for advisory boards or as speaker/chairman at scientific congresses from the following companies: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Daiichi Sankyo, Novonordisk, Pfizer/Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Sanofi. DL is an employee of Heart Care Foundation which conducted the study, partially supported by an unresctricted grant of research from Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Italy. MMG has no conflict of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: We used the Spanish national hospital discharge data from 2016 to 2022 to analyze procedures and hospital outcomes among patients aged ≥ 18 years admitted for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) according to diabetes mellitus (DM) status (non-diabetic, type 1-DM or type 2-DM)., Methods: We built logistic regression models for STEMI/NSTEMI stratified by DM status to identify variables associated with in-hospital mortality (IHM). We analyzed the effect of DM on IHM., Results: Spanish hospitals reported 201,950 STEMIs (72.7% non-diabetic, 0.5% type 1-DM, and 26.8% type 2-DM; 26.3% female) and 167,285 NSTEMIs (61.6% non-diabetic, 0.6% type 1-DM, and 37.8% type 2-DM; 30.9% female). In STEMI, the frequency of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) increased among non-diabetic people (60.4% vs. 68.6%; p < 0.001) and people with type 2-DM (53.6% vs. 66.1%; p < 0.001). In NSTEMI, the frequency of PCI increased among non-diabetic people (43.7% vs. 45.7%; p < 0.001) and people with type 2-DM (39.1% vs. 42.8%; p < 0.001). In NSTEMI, the frequency of coronary artery by-pass grafting (CABG) increased among non-diabetic people (2.8% vs. 3.5%; p < 0.001) and people with type 2-DM (3.7% vs. 5.0%; p < 0.001). In the entire population, lower IHM was associated with undergoing PCI (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval] = 0.34 [0.32-0.35] in STEMI; 0.24 [0.23-0.26] in NSTEMI) or CABG (0.33 [0.27-0.40] in STEMI; 0.45 [0.38-0.53] in NSTEMI). IHM decreased over time in STEMI (OR = 0.86 [0.80-0.93]). Type 2-DM was associated with higher IHM in STEMI (OR = 1.06 [1.01-1.11])., Conclusions: PCI and CABG were associated with lower IHM in people admitted for STEMI/NSTEMI. Type 2-DM was associated with IHM in STEMI., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background and Aims: The healthcare burden of acute chest pain is enormous. In the randomized ARTICA trial, we showed that pre-hospital identification of low-risk patients and rule-out of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) with point-of-care (POC) troponin measurement reduces 30-day healthcare costs with low major adverse cardiac events (MACE) incidence. Here we present the final 1-year results of the ARTICA trial., Methods: Low-risk patients with suspected NSTE-ACS were randomized to pre-hospital rule-out with POC troponin measurement or emergency department (ED) transfer. Primary 1-year outcome was healthcare costs. Secondary outcomes were safety, quality of life (QoL), and cost-effectiveness. Safety was defined as a 1-year MACE consisting of ACS, unplanned revascularization, or all-cause death. QoL was measured with EuroQol-5D-5L questionnaires. Cost-effectiveness was defined as 1-year healthcare costs difference per QoL difference., Results: Follow-up was completed for all 863 patients. Healthcare costs were significantly lower in the pre-hospital strategy (€1932 ± €2784 vs. €2649 ± €2750), mean difference €717 [95% confidence interval (CI) €347 to €1087; P < 0.001]. In the total population, the 1-year MACE rate was comparable between groups [5.1% (22/434) in the pre-hospital strategy vs. 4.2% (18/429) in the ED strategy; P = 0.54]. In the ruled-out ACS population, 1-year MACE remained low [1.7% (7/419) vs. 1.4% (6/417)], risk difference 0.2% (95% CI -1.4% to 1.9%; P = 0.79). QoL showed no significant difference between strategies., Conclusions: Pre-hospital rule-out of NSTE-ACS with POC troponin testing in low-risk patients is cost-effective, as expressed by a sustainable healthcare cost reduction and no significant effect on QoL. One-year MACE remained low for both strategies., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Despite a significant rise in cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), data are scarce regarding the quality of care provided, particularly for women., Methods: This is a prospective observational, cross-sectional study. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients presented to the Cardiology Department at Tanta University, Egypt, between September 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023, were enrolled. The study assessed gender disparities by comparing men and women regarding presentation, management, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occurrence during hospitalization and 30 days after discharge., Results: A total of 400 ACS patients were included, with 29.5% being women. Women were comparatively older (59 ± 9 years vs. 55 ± 13 years), with a significantly higher prevalence of hypertension (70.3% vs. 47.5%) and diabetes (55% vs. 36.8%). Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (Non-STEMI) was more common in women (35.29% vs. 21%). Dyspnea was expressed by 34.4% of women (vs. 21.35% of men). Women were hospitalized later (9.29 h vs. 6.74 h). In-hospital outcomes were poorer for women with worse NYHA classes III and IV. Additionally, the odds ratio (OR) for in-hospital cardiac mortality was 0.303 (95% CI 0.103-0.893) for women compared to men. However, a one-month follow-up for MACE post-hospital discharge did not indicate significant gender differences., Conclusions: The current study suggests that women with ACS in Egypt exhibit a higher risk profile for CVD compared to men and tend to present later with atypical symptoms. Women additionally experience poorer in-hospital MACE and higher cardiac mortality. Therefore, increasing awareness about ACS syndrome and eliminating obstacles that delay hospital admission are imperative., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: There has been a decline in hospital admission rates in many countries since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient selection differed from episodes before the pandemic. This study investigated changes in baseline characteristics as well as the short term mortality rate and probability of receiving an invasive procedure while considering sex disparities., Methods: Claims data provided by Germany's second largest insurance fund, BARMER, were used. Patients without COVID-19 who were treated for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), acute limb ischaemia (ALI), and stroke between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2021 were included. Outcomes were compared separately for both sexes between the years before the pandemic (2018/2019) and during the pandemic (2020/2021). Propensity scores with exact matching were used to balance confounders including age, drug prescriptions in the previous year, federal state, month of admission, domiciliary care, and the Elixhauser comorbidities. Short term death and probability of invasive procedures were determined using cumulative incidence functions and Cox regressions., Results: The cohort consisted of 140 989 hospitalisations of 122 340 individual patients (48.3% female) with 102 960 matched cases. Baseline characteristics were similar between episodes in the unmatched cohort. Earlier discharge was observed for all strata except for males with ALI or STEMI, where the probability of early discharge was unchanged. The probability of receiving an invasive procedure was increased for both sexes with ALI, NSTEMI, and STEMI but not for stroke. The analyses suggested neither a statistically significant increase of the in hospital mortality rate nor the 30 day mortality rate after the pandemic started., Conclusion: There was no evidence for a direct or indirect impact of the pandemic on major short term hospital outcomes. While the probability of receiving an invasive procedure increased for STEMI, NSTEMI, and ALI, the overall short term mortality rate was unaffected for both sexes., (Copyright © 2024 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: As life expectancy increases, the population of older individuals with coronary artery disease and frailty is growing. We aimed to assess the impact of patient-reported frailty on the treatment and prognosis of elderly early survivors of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS)., Methods: Frailty data were obtained from two prospective trials, POPular Age and the POPular Age Registry, which both assessed elderly NSTE-ACS patients. Frailty was assessed one month after admission with the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) and was defined as a GFI-score of 4 or higher. In these early survivors of NSTE-ACS, we assessed differences in treatment and 1-year outcomes between frail and non-frail patients, considering major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, including cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke) and major bleeding., Results: The total study population consisted of 2192 NSTE-ACS patients, aged ≥70 years. The GFI-score was available in 1320 patients (79 ± 5 years, 37% women), of whom 712 (54%) were considered frail. Frail patients were at higher risk for MACE than non-frail patients (9.7% vs. 5.1%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-2.43, p = 0.04), but not for major bleeding (3.7% vs. 2.8%, adjusted HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.65-2.32, p = 0.53). Cubic spline analysis showed a gradual increase of the risk for clinical outcomes with higher GFI-scores., Conclusions: In elderly NSTE-ACS patients who survived 1-month follow-up, patient-reported frailty was independently associated with a higher risk for 1-year MACE, but not with major bleeding. These findings emphasize the importance of frailty screening for risk stratification in elderly NSTE-ACS patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest JtB report grants from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, a Dutch government institution called ZonMw, and AstraZeneca; and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehinger Ingelheim, Bayer, Ferrer, Pfizer, and Merck, outside the submitted work. RFS reports research grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Cytosorbents and GlyCardial Diagnostics; and personal fees from Alfasigma, Alnylam, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Chiesi, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, HengRui, Idorsia, Intas Pharmaceuticals, Medscape, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, PhaseBio, Portola and Sanofi Aventis. DA reports research grants from TA Sciences, and personal fees from Philips/Volcano, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca and Novartis. AvH reports unrestricted grants to institution from Medtronic, AZ, Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbott. CvB reports no personal fees; institutional research grants to the research department of Thoraxcentrum Twente from Abbott Vascular, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic, outside the submitted work. VD report grants from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, a Dutch government institution called ZonMw. All other authors do not report any relationships that could be construed as a conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Individuals with both atrial fibrillation (AF) and myocardial infarction (MI) have higher mortality compared with individuals with only 1 condition. Whether mortality differs according to the temporal order of AF and MI is unclear., Methods and Results: We included participants from the FHS (Framingham Heart Study) from 1960 and onwards. We assessed the hazard ratio (HR) of new-onset AF and MI, and mortality according to MI and AF status (prevalent and interim) using multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Interim diseases were modeled as time-varying variables. For the analysis of new-onset AF, 10 923 participants (55% women; mean±SD age, 54±8 years) were included. For new-onset MI, 10 804 participants (55% women; mean±SD age, 54±8 years) were included. Compared with no MI, the hazard of new-onset AF was higher in participants with prevalent (HR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.32-1.94]) and interim MI (HR, 3.96 [95% CI, 3.18-4.91]). Both ST-segment-elevation MI and non-ST-segment-elevation MI were associated with new-onset AF. Interim AF, not prevalent AF, was associated with higher hazard rate of new-onset MI (HR, 2.21 [95% CI, 1.67-2.92]). Interim AF was associated with both ST-segment-elevation MI and non-ST-segment-elevation MI. Mortality was significantly greater among participants with AF and MI compared with participants with 1 of the 2, regardless of temporal order., Conclusions: We report a bidirectional association between AF and MI, which was observed for both non-ST-segment-elevation MI and ST-segment-elevation MI. Participants with both AF and MI had considerably higher mortality compared with participants with only 1 of the 2 conditions, regardless of order.

Background: Limited data are available on patients with chronic lung disease (CLD) presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We aimed to analyse baseline characteristics, treatment and outcome of those patients enrolled in the Swiss nationwide prospective AMIS Plus registry., Methods: All AMI patients enrolled between January 2002 and December 2021 with data on CLD, as defined in the Charlson Comorbidity Index, were included. The primary endpoints were in-hospital mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as all-cause death, reinfarction and cerebrovascular events. Baseline characteristics, in-hospital treatments and outcomes were analysed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression., Results: Among 53,680 AMI patients enrolled during this time, 5.8% had CLD. Compared with patients without CLD, CLD patients presented more frequently with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) and type 2 MI (12.8% vs. 6.5%, p < 0.001). With respect to treatment, CLD patients were less likely to receive P2Y12 inhibitors (p < 0.001) and less likely to undergo percutaneous coronary interventions (68.7% vs. 82.5%; p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality declined in AMI patients with CLD over time (from 12% in 2002 to 7.3% in 2021). Multivariable regression analysis showed that CLD was an independent predictor for MACCE (adjusted OR was 1.28 [95% CI 1.07-1.52], p = 0.006)., Conclusion: Patients with CLD and AMI were less likely to receive evidence-based pharmacologic treatments, coronary revascularization and had a higher incidence of MACCE during their hospital stay compared to those without CLD. Over 20 years, in-hospital mortality was significantly reduced in AMI patients, especially in those with CLD., (© 2024 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Data on the incidence of type 2 non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (T2MI) in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 has been limited to single-center studies. Given that certain characteristics, such as obesity and type 2 diabetes, have been associated with higher mortality in COVID-19 infections, we aimed to define the incidence of T2MI in a national cohort and identify pre-hospital patient characteristics associated with T2MI in hospitalized patients with COVID-19., Methods and Results: Using the national American Heart Association COVID-19 Cardiovascular Disease Quality Improvement Registry, we performed a retrospective 4:1 matched (age, sex, race, and body mass index) analysis of controls versus cases with T2MI. We performed (1) conditional multivariable logistic regression to identify predictive pre-hospital patient characteristics of T2MI for patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and (2) stratified proportional hazards regression to investigate the association of T2MI with morbidity and mortality. From January 2020 through May 2021, there were 709 (2.2%) out of 32 015 patients with T2MI. Five hundred seventy-nine cases with T2MI were matched to 2171 controls (mean age 70; 43% female). Known coronary artery disease, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, payor source, and presenting heart rate were associated with higher odds of T2MI. Anti-hyperglycemic medication and anti-coagulation use before admission were associated with lower odds of T2MI. Those with T2MI had higher morbidity and mortality (hazard ratio, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.13-1.74]; P =0.002)., Conclusions: In hospitalized patients with COVID-19, those with a T2MI compared with those without had higher morbidity and mortality. Outpatient anti-hyperglycemic and anti-coagulation use were the only pre-admission factors associated with reduced odds of T2MI.

Introduction: recent worldwide data has shown a concerning decline in the number of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) related admissions and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We suspected a similar trend at Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital (CHBAH)., Methods: a retrospective descriptive study was conducted to evaluate and compare all ACS-related admissions to the cardiac care unit (CCU) at CHBAH in the pre-COVID-19 (November 2019 to March 2020) and during COVID-19 periods (April 2020 to August 2020)., Results: the study comprised 182 patients with a mean age of 57.9 ±10.9 years (22.5% females). Of these, 108 (59.32%) patients were admitted in the pre-COVID-19 period and 74 (40.66%) during COVID-19 (p=0.0109). During the pre-COVID-19 period, 42.9% of patients had ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 39.2% with non-ST-segment -elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina (UA) was noted in 18.52%. In contrast, STEMI was noted in 50%, NSTEMI in 43.24% and UA in 6.76% of patients during the COVID-19 period. A statistically significant difference in STEMI and NSTEMI-related admissions was not noted, however, there was a greater number of admissions for UA during the pre-COVID-19 period (18.52% vs 6.76%, P =0.013). Only a third of the patients with STEMI received thrombolysis during the pre-and COVID-19 periods (30.4% vs 37.8%, P=0.47). No difference in the number of PCI procedures was noted between the pre-and during the COVID-19 periods (78.7% vs 72.9%, P=0.37)., Conclusion: there was a difference in overall ACS admissions to the CCU between pre-and during COVID-19 periods, however no difference between STEMI and NSTEMI in both periods. A higher number of UA admissions was noted during the pre-COVID-19 period. During both periods, the use of thrombolysis was low for STEMI and no difference in PCI was noted., Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright: Suzan Leon et al.)

Background: Sex differences in acute myocardial infarction treatment and outcomes are well documented, but it is unclear whether differences are consistent across countries. The objective of this study was to investigate the epidemiology, use of interventional procedures, and outcomes for older females and males hospitalized with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in 6 diverse countries., Methods: We conducted a serial cross-sectional cohort study of 1 508 205 adults aged ≥66 years hospitalized with STEMI and NSTEMI between 2011 and 2018 in the United States, Canada, England, the Netherlands, Taiwan, and Israel using administrative data. We compared females and males within each country with respect to age-standardized hospitalization rates, rates of cardiac catheterization, percutaneous coronary intervention, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery within 90 days of hospitalization, and 30-day age- and comorbidity-adjusted mortality., Results: Hospitalization rates for STEMI and NSTEMI decreased between 2011 and 2018 in all countries, although the hospitalization rate ratio (rate in males/rate in females) increased in virtually all countries (eg, US STEMI ratio, 1.58:1 in 2011 and 1.73:1 in 2018; Israel NSTEMI ratio, 1.71:1 in 2011 and 2.11:1 in 2018). Rates of cardiac catheterization, percutaneous coronary intervention, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery were lower for females than males for STEMI in all countries and years (eg, US cardiac catheterization in 2018, 88.6% for females versus 91.5% for males; Israel percutaneous coronary intervention in 2018, 76.7% for females versus 84.8% for males) with similar findings for NSTEMI. Adjusted mortality for STEMI in 2018 was higher for females than males in 5 countries (the United States, Canada, the Netherlands, Israel, and Taiwan) but lower for females than males in 5 countries for NSTEMI., Conclusions: We observed a larger decline in acute myocardial infarction hospitalizations for females than males between 2011 and 2018. Females were less likely to receive cardiac interventions and had higher mortality after STEMI. Sex disparities seem to transcend borders, raising questions about the underlying causes and remedies., Competing Interests: Disclosures None.

Aims: Women have historically been disadvantaged in terms of care and outcomes for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). We describe patterns of presentation, care, and outcomes for NSTEMI by sex in a contemporary and geographically diverse cohort., Methods and Results: Prospective cohort study including 2947 patients (907 women, 2040 men) with Type I NSTEMI from 287 centres in 59 countries, stratified by sex. Quality of care was evaluated based on 12 guideline-recommended care interventions. The all-or-none scoring composite performance measure was used to define receipt of optimal care. Outcomes included acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, repeat myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, BARC Type ≥3 bleeding, or death in-hospital, as well as 30-day mortality. Women admitted with NSTEMI were older, more comorbid, and more frequently categorized as at higher ischaemic (GRACE >140, 54.0% vs. 41.7%, P < 0.001) and bleeding (CRUSADE >40, 51.7% vs. 17.6%, P < 0.001) risk than men. Women less frequently received invasive coronary angiography (ICA; 83.0% vs. 89.5%, P < 0.001), smoking cessation advice (46.4% vs. 69.5%, P < 0.001), and P2Y12 inhibitor prescription at discharge (81.9% vs. 90.0%, P < 0.001). Non-receipt of ICA was more often due to frailty for women than men (16.7% vs. 7.8%, P = 0.010). At ICA, more women than men had non-obstructive coronary artery disease or angiographically normal arteries (15.8% vs. 6.3%, P < 0.001). Rates of in-hospital adverse outcomes and 30-day mortality were low and did not differ by sex., Conclusion: In contemporary practice, women presenting with NSTEMI, compared with men, less frequently receive antiplatelet prescription, smoking cessation advice, or are considered eligible for ICA., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: H.B., K.H., P.L., R.N., and V.K. report no conflict of interest. C.P.G. reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bayer, Boehrinher-Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Vifor, Pharma, Menarini, Wondr Medical, Raisio Group, and Oxford University Press. He has received educational and research grants from BMS, Abbott Inc., the British Heart Foundation, National Institute of Health Research, Horizon 2020, and from the European Society of Cardiology, outside the submitted work. S.B. reports personal fees from Boston Scientific, Insight, Lifetech, iVascular, and Abbott Vascular. D.M. reports personal fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Biosensors and Terumo. He has participated on Data Safety Monitoring Boards or Advisory Boards for Abbott and Boston Scientific. A.B. reports personal and institutional investigator fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, sanofi-aventis, Novartis, Amgen, Novo Nordisk, and Bayer. He reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, sanofi-aventis, Novartis, and Bayer. He has participated in Data Safety Monitoring Boards or Advisory Boards for AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, sanofi-aventis, and Bayer. He has received support for attending meetings by Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, sanofi-aventis, and Bayer. S.L. reports personal fees from ICON, Chiesi, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, and Novo Nordisk. M.L. reports speaker fees from Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Boehrinher-Ingelheim, Novartis and sanofi, and manuscript writing fees from Edwards Lifesciences. She has also participated as an advisory board member for sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, and Boehrinher-Ingelheim. Y.A. reports a research grant from the Dutch Heart Foundation. Signed COIs available for all authors., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: The frequency of perioperative myocardial infarction has been declining; however, previous studies have only described type 1 myocardial infarctions. Here, we evaluate the overall frequency of myocardial infarction with the addition of an International Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD-10-CM) code for type 2 myocardial infarction and the independent association with in-hospital mortality., Methods: A longitudinal cohort study spanning the introduction of the ICD-10-CM diagnostic code for type 2 myocardial infarction using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2018. Hospital discharges that included a primary surgical procedure code for intrathoracic, intraabdominal, or suprainguinal vascular surgery were included. Type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarctions were identified using ICD-10-CM codes. We used segmented logistic regression to estimate change in frequency of myocardial infarctions and multivariable logistic regression to determine the association with in-hospital mortality., Results: A total of 360,264 unweighted discharges were included, representing 1,801,239 weighted discharges, with median age 59 and 56% female. The overall incidence of myocardial infarction was 0.76% (13,605/1,801,239). Before the introduction of type 2 myocardial infarction code, there was a small baseline decrease in the monthly frequency of perioperative myocardial infarctions (odds ratio [OR], 0.992; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.984-1.000; P  =   .042), but no change in the trend after the introduction of the diagnostic code (OR, 0.998; 95% CI, 0.991-1.005; P  =   .50). In 2018, where there was an entire year where type 2 myocardial infarction was officially a diagnosis, the distribution of myocardial infarction type 1 was 8.8% (405/4580) ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 45.6% (2090/4580) non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and 45.5% (2085/4580) type 2 myocardial infarction. STEMI and NSTEMI were associated with increased in-hospital mortality (OR, 8.96; 95% CI, 6.20-12.96; P < .001 and OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.34-1.89; P < .001). A diagnosis of type 2 myocardial infarction was not associated with increased odds of in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.81-1.53; P  =   .50) when accounting for surgical procedure, medical comorbidities, patient demographics, and hospital characteristics., Conclusions: The frequency of perioperative myocardial infarctions did not increase after the introduction of a new diagnostic code for type 2 myocardial infarctions. A diagnosis of type 2 myocardial infarction was not associated with increased in-patient mortality; however, few patients received invasive management that may have confirmed the diagnosis. Further research is needed to identify what type of intervention, if any, may improve outcomes in this patient population., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: See Disclosures at the end of the article., (Copyright © 2023 International Anesthesia Research Society.)

Background: Depression has been suggested to increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, but many studies assessed depression after heart disease onset. This study evaluated the association between depression and myocardial infarction (MI) using a large inpatient database. Methods: We analyzed patients from the National Inpatient Sample hospitals from 2005 to 2020, selecting those aged >30 with ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for segment elevation (ST) elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST elevation myocardial elevation (NSTEMI) and major depression. Results: Our data included 4413,113 STEMI patients (224,430 with depression) and 10,421,346 NSTEMI patients (437,058 with depression). No significant association was found between depression and MI. For STEMI, the 2005 odds ratio was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.10-0.15, p  < 0.001) and the 2020 odds ratio was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.69-0.73, p  < 0.001). Similar patterns were observed for NSTEMI. Conclusion: Depression may not independently be a significant risk factor for MI.

Background: Evidence suggests that hypothyroidism may be associated with an increased risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The data regarding the influence of hypothyroidism on cardiovascular disease in the Asian population is conflicting. Therefore, we undertook this study to assess the overall prevalence of hypothyroidism in Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) patients and determine if there is a relationship between hypothyroidism, both sub-clinical and overt and other significant risk factors of ACS in an Indian population., Methods: We studied 487 hospitalized patients between March 2018 and February 2021 with a diagnosis of ACS to determine the prevalence of hypothyroidism, both clinical and sub-clinical and their relationship with other known coronary risk factors. Thyroid function Tests - free T3, free T4 and TSH were collected from all the patients within 24 h of their admission to the coronary care unit (CCU) of 2 major hospitals in New Delhi and Imphal (Manipur)., Results: Subclinical hypothyroidism was prevalent in 44 (9 %), followed by overt hypothyroidism in 25 (5.2 %). Subclinical hypothyroidism was more common in females, whereas overt hypothyroidism was more common in males. ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) (52 %), followed by Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) (25 %), was the commonest diagnosis at presentation. Patients with overt hypothyroidism showed a higher proportion of increased triglyceride levels. Patients with hypothyroidism had no differences in the prevalence of concomitant diabetes hypertension and other coronary risk factors., Conclusions: Patients with ACS without known thyroid disorders should be screened for hypothyroidism since it is found frequently. There might be a case to treat their thyroid dysfunction appropriately., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Compared with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, non-STEMI (NSTEMI) patients have more comorbidities and extensive coronary artery disease. Contemporary comparative data on the long-term prognosis of stable post-myocardial infarction subtypes are needed., Design: Long-Term rIsk, clinical manaGement and healthcare Resource utilisation of stable coronary artery dISease (TIGRIS) was a multinational, observational and longitudinal cohort study., Setting: Patients were enrolled from 350 centres, with >95% coming from cardiology practices across 24 countries, from 19 June 2013 to 31 March 2017., Participants: This study enrolled 8277 stable patients 1-3 years after myocardial infarction with ≥1 additional risk factor., Outcome Measures: Over a 2 year follow-up, cardiovascular events and deaths and self-reported health using the EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire score were recorded. Relative risk of clinical events and health resource utilisation in STEMI and NSTEMI patients were compared using multivariable Poisson regression models, adjusting for prognostically relevant patient factors., Results: Of 7752 patients with known myocardial infarction type, 46% had NSTEMI; NSTEMI patients were older with more comorbidities than STEMI patients. NSTEMI patients had significantly poorer self-reported health and lower prevalence of dual antiplatelet therapy at hospital discharge and at enrolment 1-3 years later. NSTEMI patients had a higher incidence of combined myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death (5.6% vs 3.9%, p<0.001) and higher all-cause mortality (4.2% vs 2.6%, p<0.001) compared with STEMI patients. Risks were attenuated after adjusting for other patient characteristics. Health resource utilisation was higher in NSTEMI patients, although STEMI patients had more cardiologist visits., Conclusions: Post-NSTEMI chronic coronary syndrome patients had a less favourable risk factor profile, poorer self-reported health and more adverse cardiovascular events during long-term follow-up than individuals post STEMI. Efforts are needed to recognise the risks of stable patients after NSTEMI and optimise secondary prevention and care., Trial Registration Number: NCT01866904., Competing Interests: Competing interests: SP and RO have received research grant support from AstraZeneca. SGG has received speaker/consulting honoraria and/or research grant support from Amgen, Anthos Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol‑Myers Squibb, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo/American Regent, Eli Lilly, Esperion, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, HLS Therapeutics, JAMP Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk A/C, Pendopharm/Pharmascience, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier, Valeo Pharma and salary support/honoraria from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario/University of Toronto (Polo) Chair, Canadian Heart Research Centre and MD Primer, Canadian VIGOUR Centre, Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Centre for Clinical Research, Duke Clinical Research Institute, New York University Clinical Coordinating Centre, PERFUSE Research Institute, TIMI Study Group (Brigham Health). CBG has received consulting honoraria and/or research grant support from Armetheon, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Medtronic, Pfizer, Salix Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, Takeda and The Medicines Company. JCN has received speaker/consulting honoraria and/or research grant support from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, CSL Behringer, DalCor, Esperion, Janssen, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Servier and Vifor. TS has received speaker/consulting honoraria and/or research grant support from Astellas, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and Sanofi. DW has received speaker/consulting honoraria and/or research grant support from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Berlin-Chemie, Biotronik and Novartis. SY has received speaker/consulting honoraria and/or research grant support from Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim. DB has received speaker/consulting honoraria and/or research grant support from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Eli Lilly, Merck and Sanofi. MGC has received speaker/consulting honoraria and/or research grant support from AstraZeneca, Medtronic, Abiomed and Merit Medical. KA and PRH are employees of AstraZeneca. GB-W was an employee of AstraZeneca at the time of this study. SNK and PK declare no competing interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

The WAMIF study was conducted from 2017 to 2019 to include 314 patients in 30 French investigative centers in France. We have systematically collected the clinical, morphological and biological characteristics of cases of myocardial infarction affecting women under 50 years of age and evaluated their short-term (intra-hospital) and mid-term (at 12 months) prognosis. . The main results were: a particularly high incidence of modifiable risk factors affecting 86% of patients with smoking in the first place in 75% of them. The clinical presentation revealed chest pain in more than 90% of cases. The pathophysiological forms of acute coronary syndrome identified the culprit artery in 90% of cases, MI without obstruction (MINOCA) was found in 17.8% of the ST elevation MI (STEMI), spontaneous dissection in 14.6% of STEMI and 16.3% of NSTEMI. Hospital events included 3 strokes, 3 cases of bleeding and no deaths. At 12 months, follow-up showed no cardiovascular deaths. The results of this study allow us to better understand the particularities of cardiovascular diseases in women and thus to develop targeted strategies for prevention and improvement of their management., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Unstable angina (UA), considered historically a marker of high risk, has rarely been studied in the high sensitive troponin era. We sought to characterise this population and determine short- and medium-term outcomes for UA and compared this to both patients with musculoskeletal chest pain and adjudicated type 1 MI (NSTEMI)., Method: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of 2 prospective cohort studies of suspected acute coronary syndrome in 2 hospitals in the northwest of England. (n = 3018) We used a dedicated symptom score to diagnose unstable angina. Type 1 MI (NSTEMI) was diagnosed by independent physician adjudication according to 3rd universal definition of MI. Follow-up was 100% complete for all patients to 1 year., Results: 185 (6.1%) and 249 (8.3%) were adjudicated as suffering from UA and NSTEMI respectively. We restricted our analysis of UA to 158 (5.2%) patients with UA with high sensitive troponin T (Roche Elecsys) ≤14 ng/L (≤99th percentile). Compared to the NSTEMI population, the UA cohort were younger (59 vs 74, p < 0.002), had a lower incidence of hypertension (56.3% vs 69.1%, p = 0.009), had significantly lower composite risk scores and had fewer ECG abnormalities (ST depression >1 mm, 5.1% vs 15.6%, p = 0.001, T wave flattened, biphasic or inverted 24.1% vs 47.8%, p < 0.0001). Subsequent Type 1 MI to 30 days and 1 year in the UA cohort was 1.9% and 1.9% respectively compared to 0.8% and 2.4% in the index type 1 MI (NSTEMI cohort) respectively. However, compared to patients presenting with musculoskeletal chest pain (n = 468) there was a significantly greater incidence of subsequent MI and coronary revascularisation in patients with unstable angina. All cause death at 30 days and 1 year was 0.0% and 0.6% (n = 1) for UA patients and 2.8% (n = 7) and 16.1% (n = 40) for the NSTEMI cohort respectively., Conclusion: UA, defined objectively by a symptom score and absence of myocyte necrosis, is still prevalent as an entity, with a risk of subsequent MI and urgent or emergency coronary revascularisation. However, mortality is >10-fold lower when compared to NSTEMI, indicating a less severe pathology in terms of atherosclerosis or plaque burden, and implying the need for a different management strategy to that of NSTEMI., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: There are limited data on in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) complicating non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) based on management strategy., Methods: We used National Inpatient Sample (2000-2017) to identify adults with NSTEMI (not undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting) and concomitant IHCA. The cohort was stratified based on use of early (hospital day 0) or delayed (≥hospital day 1) coronary angiography (CAG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and medical management. Outcomes included incidence of IHCA, in-hospital mortality, adverse events, length of stay, and hospitalization costs., Results: Of 6,583,662 NSTEMI admissions, 375,873 (5.7 %) underwent early CAG, 1,133,143 (17.2 %) received delayed CAG, 2,326,391 (35.3 %) underwent PCI, and 2,748,255 (41.7 %) admissions were managed medically. The medical management cohort was older, predominantly female, and with higher comorbidities. Overall, 63,085 (1.0 %) admissions had IHCA, and incidence of IHCA was highest in the medical management group (1.4 % vs 1.1 % vs 0.7 % vs 0.6 %, p < 0.001) compared to early CAG, delayed CAG and PCI groups, respectively. In adjusted analysis, early CAG (adjusted OR [aOR] 0.67 [95 % confidence interval {CI} 0.65-0.69]; p < 0.001), delayed CAG (aOR 0.49 [95 % CI 0.48-0.50]; p < 0.001), and PCI (aOR 0.42 [95 % CI 0.41-0.43]; p < 0.001) were associated with lower incidence of IHCA compared to medical management. Compared to medical management, early CAG (adjusted OR 0.53, CI: 0.49-0.58), delayed CAG (adjusted OR 0.34, CI: 0.32-0.36) and PCI (adjusted OR 0.19, CI: 0.18-0.20) were associated with lower in-hospital mortality (all p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Early CAG and PCI in NSTEMI was associated with lower incidence of IHCA and lower mortality among NSTEMI-IHCA admissions., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aims: We evaluated the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital admission and quality of care for acute coronary syndrome., Methods and Results: Data for all patients admitted to hospital care for acute coronary syndromes in Slovenia (nationwide cohort) between 2014 and 2021 were obtained by merging the national hospital database, national medicines reimbursement database and population mortality registry using unique identifying numbers. Using interrupted time series analysis, we assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital admission rates and quality of care (in-hospital and 30-day mortality, reperfusion and secondary preventive medication uptake). Data were fitted to segmented regression models with March 2020 as the breakpoint. Data on 21 001 patients were included (7057 ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 7649 non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and 6295 unstable angina). Hospital admissions for STEMI remained stable (92 patients; +1 patient per month, p=0.783), whereas the pandemic was associated with a significant reduction in NSTEMI (81 patients; -21 patients per month, p=0.015) and unstable angina admissions (47 patients; -28 patients per month, p=0.025). In patients with STEMI, the pandemic did not affect reperfusion rates (0.29%, (95% CI) -1.5% to 2.1%, p=0.755) or in-hospital mortality (0.1%, (95% CI) -0.9% to 1.1%, p=0.815), but was associated with a significant negative trend for secondary preventive medication uptake (-0.12%, (95% CI) -0.23% to -0.01%, p=0.034)., Conclusion: In Slovenia, hospital admissions for STEMI remained stable throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, but NSTEMI and unstable angina admissions dropped significantly. While mortality and reperfusion rates were not affected, the pandemic was associated with a continual negative time trend for the uptake of secondary preventive medication., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Acute myocardial infarction (MI) may concomitantly occur with acute ischemic stroke. The incidence and outcomes of acute non-ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI) in acute ischemic stroke are not well studied. We examined hospitalized patients with acute ischemic stroke and a concomitant NSTEMI diagnosis who were included in the National Inpatient Sample 2016 to 2019. Acute ischemic stroke and NSTEMI were defined by using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Patients with ST-elevation MI were excluded. The outcomes were expressed as percentages. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association of concomitant acute ischemic stroke and NSTEMI with the primary outcome of mortality and the secondary outcomes. A subgroup analysis of patients with NSTEMI with acute ischemic stroke that underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (angiography and angioplasty) was also performed. Of the total hospitalized patients with acute ischemic stroke (n = 1,726,265), 1.60% (n = 27,630) patients (mean age 73.5 years, 52.2% women, 67% White race) had NSTEMI diagnosed during the hospitalization. Of these, 14.1% (n = 3,890) died in the NSTEMI group and 3.4% (n = 57,670) died in the non-NSTEMI group. The most common outcomes in the NSTEMI group were Acute kidney injury 31.8%, Intracranial hemorrhage 6.6%, and sepsis 6.13%. NSTEMI in acute ischemic stroke was associated with mortality (odds ratio [OR] 3.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.29 to 3.93, p ≤0.001), ICH (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.63, p <0.001), and having any of the secondary outcomes (OR 2.73, 95% CI 2.57 to 2.90, p <0.001). PCI was performed in 9.14% of patients with acute ischemic stroke with NSTEMI. PCI was associated with having any of the secondary outcomes (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.02, p = 0.8), mortality (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.54, p <0.001), and ICH (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.7, p = 0.01). In conclusion, NSTEMI in acute ischemic stroke is associated with increased mortality and other adverse events. PCI in the subgroup of patients with NSTEMI was not associated with increased mortality or intracranial bleeding., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Low serum magnesium (sMg) is associated with cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerotic disease., Objective: To evaluate the association between sMg levels on admission and clinical outcomes in hospitalized non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients., Methods: A retrospective analysis of all patients admitted to a single tertiary center with a primary diagnosis of NSTEMI. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease were excluded. Clinical data were collected and compared between lower sMg quartile patients (Q1; sMg < 1.9 mg/dL) and all other patients (Q2-Q4; sMg ≥ 1.9 mg/dL)., Results: The study cohort included 4552 patients (70% male, median age 69 [IQR 59-79]) who were followed for a median of 4.4 (IQR 2.4-6.6) years. The median sMg level in the low sMg group was 1.7 (1.6-1.8) and 2.0 (2.0-2.2) mg/dL in the normal/high sMg group. The low sMg group was older (mean of 72 vs. 67 years), less likely to be male (64% vs. 72%), and had higher rates of comorbidities, including diabetes, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation (59% vs. 29%, 92% vs. 85%, and 6% vs. 5%; p < 0.05 for all). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated significantly higher cumulative death probability at 4 years in the low sMg group (34% vs. 22%; p log rank <0.001). In a multivariable analysis model adjusted for sex, significant comorbidities, coronary interventions during the hospitalization, and renal function, the low sMg group exhibited an independent 24% increased risk of death during follow up (95% CI 1.11-1.39; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Low sMg is independently associated with higher risk of long-term mortality among patients recovering from an NSTEMI event.

Background Gender-related factors are psycho-socio-cultural characteristics and are associated with adverse clinical outcomes in acute myocardial infarction, independent of sex. Whether sex- and gender-related factors contribute to the substantial heterogeneity in hospital length of stay (LOS) among patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction remains unknown. Methods and Results This observational cohort study combined and analyzed data from the GENESIS-PRAXY (Gender and Sex Determinants of Cardiovascular Disease: From Bench to Beyond Premature Acute Coronary Syndrome study), EVA (Endocrine Vascular Disease Approach study), and VIRGO (Variation in Recovery: Role of Gender on Outcomes of Young AMI [Acute Myocardial Infarction] Patients study) cohorts of adults hospitalized across Canada, the United States, Switzerland, Italy, Spain, and Australia for non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. In total, 5219 participants were assessed for eligibility. Sixty-three patients were excluded for missing LOS, and 2938 were excluded because of no non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction diagnosis. In total, 2218 participants were analyzed (66% women; mean±SD age, 48.5±7.9 years; 67.8% in the United States). Individuals with longer LOS (51%) were more likely to be White race, were more likely to have diabetes, hypertension, and a lower income, and were less likely to be employed and have completed secondary education. No univariate association between sex and LOS was observed. In the adjusted multivariable model, age (0.62 d/10 y; P <0.001), unemployment (0.63 days; P =0.01), and some of countries included relative to Canada (Italy, 4.1 days; Spain, 1.7 days; and the United States, -1.0 days; all P <0.001) were independently associated with longer LOS. Medical history mediated the effect of employment on LOS. No interaction between sex and employment was observed. Longer LOS was associated with increased 12-month all-cause mortality. Conclusions Older age, unemployment, and country of hospitalization were independent predictors of LOS, regardless of sex. Individuals employed with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction were more likely to experience shorter LOS. Sociocultural factors represent a potential target for improvement in health care expenditure and resource allocation.

Background: Recently two indicators - metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) and triglyceride glucose-BMI (TyG-BMI) have been proposed as surrogate markers of IR and potential cardiovascular risk factors. The aim of the study was to assess the predictive value of METS-IR and TyG-BMI concerning the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality in 1-year follow-up among patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction (AMI)., Methods: Two thousand one hundred fifty-three patients with a median age of 68 years were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of AMI., Results: MACE occurred in 7.9% of the patients in the ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) group and in 10.9% of the non-STEMI (NSTEMI) group. No significant difference in median MACE-IR and TyG-BMI between patients with and without incidence of MACE was found in both groups. None of the examined indices were predictors of MACE in the STEMI and NSTEMI groups. Moreover, both of them did not predict MACE in subgroups of patients classified according to the presence of diabetes. Finally, METS-IR and TyG-BMI were significant predictors of 1-year morality, however with low prognostic value and only in univariate regression analysis., Conclusion: METS-IR and TyG-BMI should not be used in predicting MACE among patients with AMI., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Non-ST-segment myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) occurs frequently in a growing population of patients with chronic heart failure (HF) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) but outcomes with invasive management approaches are unknown. We sought to determine in-hospital outcomes with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in comparison with medical management only. The National Inpatient Sample was used to capture hospitalizations in the United States from 2006 to 2019. Admissions for NSTEMI in patients with chronic HF and ESRD were identified by International Classification of Diseases codes. The cohort was divided into those that received PCI or medical management only. In-hospital outcomes were compared by multivariable logistic regression and propensity matching. In 27,433 hospitalizations, 8,004 patients (29%) underwent PCI, and 19,429 (71%) were managed with medications only. PCI was associated with lower adjusted odds of death during hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.52 to 0.66, p <0.01). This association remained consistent after propensity matching (adjusted odds ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.49 to 0.64, p <0.01) and was apparent across all subtypes of HF. Patients with PCI had greater duration (5, 3, to 9 vs, 5, 3 to 8 days, p <0.01) and cost of hospitalization ($107,942, 70,230 to $173,182 vs, $44,156, 24,409 to $80,810, p <0.01). In conclusion, patients with HF and ESRD admitted for NSTEMI experienced lower in-hospital mortality with PCI in comparison with medical therapy only. Invasive percutaneous revascularization may be reasonable for appropriately selected patients with HF and ESRD but randomized controlled trials are needed to determine its safety and efficacy in this high-risk population., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Cardiovascular procedural treatments were deferred at scale during the COVID-19 pandemic, with unclear impact on patients presenting with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Methods and Results In a retrospective cohort study of all patients diagnosed with NSTEMI in the US Veterans Affairs Healthcare System from January 1, 2019 to October 30, 2022 (n=67 125), procedural treatments and outcomes were compared between the prepandemic period and 6 unique pandemic phases: (1) acute phase, (2) community spread, (3) first peak, (4) post vaccine, (5) second peak, and (6) recovery. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess the association between pandemic phases and 30-day mortality. NSTEMI volumes dropped significantly with the pandemic onset (62.7% of prepandemic peak) and did not revert to prepandemic levels in subsequent phases, even after vaccine availability. Percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting volumes declined proportionally. Compared with the prepandemic period, patients with NSTEMI experienced higher 30-day mortality during Phases 2 and 3, even after adjustment for COVID-19-positive status, demographics, baseline comorbidities, and receipt of procedural treatment (adjusted odds ratio for Phases 2 and 3 combined, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.13-1.43], P <0.01). Patients receiving Veterans Affairs-paid community care had a higher adjusted risk of 30-day mortality compared with those at Veterans Affairs hospitals across all 6 pandemic phases. Conclusions Higher mortality after NSTEMI occurred during the initial spread and first peak of the pandemic but resolved before the second, higher peak-suggesting effective adaptation of care delivery but a costly delay to implementation. Investigation into the vulnerabilities of the early pandemic spread are vital to informing future resource-constrained practices.

Background: Worldwide, cardiovascular diseases are the major cause of mortality and morbidity with acute coronary syndrome as the most common clinical manifestation. In a typical clinical setup, around 30% of the patients presented with "ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)" caused by the complete occlusion of the coronary artery and the remaining 70% with intermittent or partial occlusion of the coronary termed as non-ST elevation The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and characteristics of non-obstructive coronary arteries among patients presenting with non ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) at a tertiary care cardiac center of Karachi, Pakistan., Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study, conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Karachi. Study inclusion criteria were patients of either gender admitted with NSTE-ACS and aged between 30-70 years. A routine coronary angiogram was performed in all the patients and the absence of ≥50% stenosis in any major epicardial vessel was taken in non-obstructive coronaries., Results: A total of 174 patients (30-70 years) were included, of which 99 (56.9%) were male and the mean age was 59.43±11.24 years. In the distribution of socioeconomic status, 54 (31.0%) were lower class, middle class 81 (46.6%) while upper-class status were 39 (22.4%). Hypertension was observed in 76 (43.7%), chronic kidney disease in 20 (11.5%), and hyperlipidemia in 55 (31.6%). Non-obstructive coronary arteries were noted in 25 (14.4%) patients., Conclusions: It is to be concluded that non-obstructive coronary arteries are fairly prevalent in patients arriving in hospitals with NSTE-ACS in our population. Further research is needed to better understand the underlying pathophysiology and optimal management strategies for patients with NOCA in the setting of NSTEMI.

Background: Women are underrepresented in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) studies. Furthermore, there is scarce information regarding women with AMI in Latin America., Aims: To describe the presentation, clinical characteristics, risk factor burden, evidence-based care, and in-hospital outcome in a population of women with AMI admitted to a coronary care unit (CCU) in Mexico., Methods: Retrospective cohort study including patients with AMI admitted from January 2006 to December 2021 in a CCU. We identified patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). We described demographic characteristics, clinical variables, treatment, and in-hospital outcomes according to gender. Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of mortality., Results: Our study included 12,069 patients with AMI, of whom 7,599 had STEMI and 4,470 had NSTEMI. Women represented 19.6% of the population. Women had higher rates of hypertension, diabetes, stroke, and atrial fibrillation than men. For STEMI, women were less likely to receive reperfusion therapy (fibrinolysis; 23.7 vs. 28.5%, p < 0.001 and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); 31.2 vs. 35.1%, p = 0.001) and had more major adverse events than men: heart failure (4.2 vs. 2.5%, p = 0.002), pulmonary edema (3.4% vs. 1.7%, p < 0.001), major bleeding (2.1% vs. 1%, p = 0.002), stroke (1.3% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.008), and mortality (15.1% vs. 8.1%, p < 0.001). For NSTEMI, women were less likely to undergo coronary angiography or PCI and had more major bleeding and mortality. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that females had an increase in mortality in STEMI and NSTEMI (HR 1.21, CI 1.01-1.47, p = 0.05 and HR 1.39, CI 1.06-1.81, p = 0.01)., Conclusion: Real-world evidence from a hospital in a Latin American low- to middle-income country (LMIC) showed that women with AMI had more comorbidities, received less reperfusion treatment or invasive strategies, and had worse outcomes. In STEMI and NSTEMI, female gender represented an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality., Competing Interests: The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s).)

Importance: Differences in the organization and financing of health systems may produce more or less equitable outcomes for advantaged vs disadvantaged populations. We compared treatments and outcomes of older high- and low-income patients across 6 countries., Objective: To determine whether treatment patterns and outcomes for patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction differ for low- vs high-income individuals across 6 countries., Design, Setting, and Participants: Serial cross-sectional cohort study of all adults aged 66 years or older hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction from 2013 through 2018 in the US, Canada, England, the Netherlands, Taiwan, and Israel using population-representative administrative data., Exposures: Being in the top and bottom quintile of income within and across countries., Main Outcomes and Measures: Thirty-day and 1-year mortality; secondary outcomes included rates of cardiac catheterization and revascularization, length of stay, and readmission rates., Results: We studied 289 376 patients hospitalized with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 843 046 hospitalized with non-STEMI (NSTEMI). Adjusted 30-day mortality generally was 1 to 3 percentage points lower for high-income patients. For instance, 30-day mortality among patients admitted with STEMI in the Netherlands was 10.2% for those with high income vs 13.1% for those with low income (difference, -2.8 percentage points [95% CI, -4.1 to -1.5]). One-year mortality differences for STEMI were even larger than 30-day mortality, with the highest difference in Israel (16.2% vs 25.3%; difference, -9.1 percentage points [95% CI, -16.7 to -1.6]). In all countries, rates of cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention were higher among high- vs low-income populations, with absolute differences ranging from 1 to 6 percentage points (eg, 73.6% vs 67.4%; difference, 6.1 percentage points [95% CI, 1.2 to 11.0] for percutaneous intervention in England for STEMI). Rates of coronary artery bypass graft surgery for patients with STEMI in low- vs high-income strata were similar but for NSTEMI were generally 1 to 2 percentage points higher among high-income patients (eg, 12.5% vs 11.0% in the US; difference, 1.5 percentage points [95% CI, 1.3 to 1.8 ]). Thirty-day readmission rates generally also were 1 to 3 percentage points lower and hospital length of stay generally was 0.2 to 0.5 days shorter for high-income patients., Conclusions and Relevance: High-income individuals had substantially better survival and were more likely to receive lifesaving revascularization and had shorter hospital lengths of stay and fewer readmissions across almost all countries. Our results suggest that income-based disparities were present even in countries with universal health insurance and robust social safety net systems.

Objectives: To determine the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) types in the Asir region of Saudi Arabia and the importance of hematological testing for CVD patients in the context of disease management., Methods: This retrospective study comprised 416 CVD patients, and samples were divided based the type of CVD. The Mann Whitney U test was used to compare patients' hematological markers and coagulation profiles to those of healthy controls., Results: The rate of ischemic heart disease (IHD) was 80.7% that of other CVDs, and the rate of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was 37.3% the rate of CVD. Significant differences were observed in the hematological and coagulation parameters of CVD patients compared to the control group. White blood cells (WBC) were significantly higher in STEMI, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), unstable angina (UA), and heart failure (HF) groups. Red blood cells (RBC) were significantly lower in STEMI, NSTEMI, UA, chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), HF, dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), and ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). Red distribution width (RDW) was significantly greater in the HF, DCM, and ICM groups. Prothrombin time (PT) was significantly higher in the STEMI, HF, and DCM groups., Conclusion: ST-elevation myocardial infarction has a higher prevalence rate among CVD patients in the Asir region. Both coagulation and hematological indicators have high potential utility as CVD diagnostic and prognostic markers., (Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal.)

Background: Reports about the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of hospital admissions and in-hospital mortality during the first wave between March and May 2020 showed conflicting results and are limited by single-center or limited regional multicenter datasets. Aim of this analysis covering all German federal states was the comprehensive description of hospital admissions and in-hospital mortality during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic., Methods and Results: We conducted an observational study on hospital routine data (§21 KHEntgG) and included patients with the main diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (ICD 21 and ICD 22). A total of 159 hospitals included 36,329 patients in the database, with 12,497 patients admitted with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 23,832 admitted with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). There was a significant reduction in the number of patients admitted with STEMI (3748 in 2020, 4263 in 2019 and 4486 in 2018; p < 0.01) and NSTEMI (6957 in 2020, 8437 in 2019 and 8438 in 2020; p < 0.01). These reductions were different between the Federal states of Germany. Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed more often in 2020 than in 2019 (odds ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.21) and 2018 (odds ratio 1.20, 95% CI 1.12-1.29) in NSTEMI and more often than in 2018 (odds ratio 1.26, 95% CI 1.10-1.43) in STEMI. The in-hospital mortality did not differ between the years for STEMI and NSTEMI, respectively., Conclusions: In this large representative sample size of hospitals in Germany, we observed significantly fewer admissions for NSTEMI and STEMI during the first COVID-19 wave, while quality of in-hospital care and in-hospital mortality were not affected. Admissions for STEMI and NSTEMI during the months March to May over 3 years and corresponding in-hospital mortality for patients with STEMI and NSTEMI in 159 German hospitals. (p-value for admissions 2020 versus 2019 and 2018: < 0.01; p-value for mortality: n.s.)., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Some patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) present as ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study evaluates the characteristics, management and outcomes of SCAD patients presenting as STEMI compared to non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)., Methods: We analysed data from consecutive patients included in the prospective Spanish Registry on SCAD. All coronary angiograms were centrally reviewed. All adverse events were adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee., Results: Between June 2015 to December 2020, 389 patients were included. Forty-two percent presented with STEMI and 56% with NSTEMI. STEMI patients showed a worse distal flow (TIMI flow 0-1 38% vs 19%, p < 0.001) and more severe (% diameter stenosis 85 ± 18 vs 75 ± 21, p < 0.001) and longer (42 ± 23 mm vs 35 ± 24 mm, p = 0.006) lesions. Patients with STEMI were more frequently treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (31% vs 16%, p < 0.001) and developed more frequently left ventricular systolic dysfunction (21% vs 8%, p < 0.001). No differences were found in combined major adverse events during admission (7% vs 5%, p = 0.463), but in-hospital reinfarctions (5% vs 1.4%, p = 0.039) and cardiogenic shock (2.6% vs 0%, p = 0.019) were more frequently seen in the STEMI group. At late follow-up (median 29 months) no differences were found in the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (13% vs 13%, p-value = 0.882) between groups., Conclusions: Patients with SCAD and STEMI had a worse angiographic profile and were more frequently referred to PCI compared to NSTEMI patients. Despite these disparities, both short and long-term prognosis were similar in STEMI and NSTEMI SCAD patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None of the authors declare a conflict of interest related to this manuscript., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Prior data have shown rising acute myocardial infarction (MI) trends in Australia; whether these increases have continued in recent years is not known. This study thus sought to characterise contemporary nationwide trends in MI hospitalisations and coronary procedures in Australia and their associated economic burden., Methods: The primary outcome measure was the incidence and time trends of total MI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) hospitalisations from 1993 to 2017. The incidence and time trends of coronary procedures were additionally collected, alongside MI hospitalisation costs., Results: Adjusted for population changes, annual MI incidence increased from 216.2 cases per 100 000 to a peak of 270.4 in 2007 with subsequent decline to 218.7 in 2017. Similarly, NSTEMI incidence increased from 68.0 cases per 100 000 in 1993 to a peak of 192.6 in 2007 with subsequent decline to 162.6 in 2017. STEMI incidence decreased from 148.3 cases per 100 000 in 1993 to 56.2 in 2017. Across the study period, there were annual increases in MI hospitalisations of 0.7% and NSTEMI hospitalisations of 5.6%, and an annual decrease in STEMI hospitalisations of 4.8%. Angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention increased by 3.4% and 3.3% annually, respectively, while coronary artery bypass graft surgery declined by 2.2% annually. MI hospitalisation costs increased by 100% over the study period, despite a decreased average length of stay by 45%., Conclusions: The rising incidence of MI hospitalisations appear to have stabilised in Australia. Despite this, associated healthcare expenditure remains significant, suggesting a need for continual implementation of public health policies and preventative strategies., Competing Interests: Competing interests: DHL reports that the University of Adelaide received on his behalf lecture and/or consulting fees from Abbott Medical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Biotronik, Medtronic, MicroPort CRM and Pfizer. PS reports having served on the advisory board of Medtronic, Abbott Medical, Boston Scientific, CathRx and PaceMate. PS reports that the University of Adelaide has received on his behalf lecture and/or consulting fees from Medtronic, Abbott Medical and Boston Scientific. PS reports that the University of Adelaide has received on his behalf research funding from Medtronic, Abbott Medical, Boston Scientific and Microport. CXW reports that the University of Adelaide has received on his behalf lecture, travel and/or research funding from Abbott Medical, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medtronic, Novartis, Servier, St Jude Medical and Vifor Pharma. The other authors have nothing to disclose., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Management of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) has evolved over the years, but most published data are from younger patients. Data on the NSTEMI management in older patients remain limited. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the long-term outcomes of invasive versus conservative strategies in older patients (>70 years old) with NSTEMI. Of 1,550 reports searched, 4 randomized controlled trials (1,126 patients) were included in the analysis, with a median follow-up of 1.25 years (range: 1 to 2.5 years). The median age of included patients was 83.6 (interquartile range: 2.8 years). The invasive strategy was associated with significantly lower risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (odds ratio [OR] 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40 to 0.91, I 2  = 54%; 3 trials] and unplanned revascularization (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.64, I 2  = 1.7%; 3 trials] than was the conservative strategy. There was no difference in all-cause mortality (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.18, I 2  = 0%; 4 trials], myocardial infarction (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.19, I 2  = 54.7%; 4 trials], or bleeding (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.93, I 2  = 0%; 3 trials] between the strategies. In conclusion, the use of initial invasive strategy in older patients presenting with NSTEMI was associated with a significantly lower risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event and unplanned revascularization than that of the initial conservative strategy without increased bleeding., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: We sought to assess the clinical impact of Covid-19 infection on mortality in patients with Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) admitted during the national outbreak in Italy., Methods: We analysed a nationwide, comprehensive, and universal administrative database of consecutive NSTEMI patients admitted during lockdown for Covid-19 infection (March,11st - May 3rd, 2020) and the equivalent periods of the previous 5 years in Italy. The observed rate of 30-day and 6-month all-cause mortality of NSTEMI patients with and without Covid-19 infection during the lockdown was compared with the expected rate of death according to the trend of the previous 5 years., Results: During the period of observation, 48.447 NSTEMI hospitalizations occurred in Italy. Among these, 4981 NSTEMI patients were admitted during the 2020 outbreak: 173 (3.5%) with and 4808 (96.5%) without a Covid-19 diagnosis. According to the 5-year trend, the 2020 expected rate of 30-day and 6-month all-cause mortality was 6.5% and 12.2%, while the observed incidence of death was 8.3% (p = 0.001) and 13.6% (p = 0.041), respectively. Excluding NSTEMI patients with a Covid-19 diagnosis, the 6-month mortality rate resulted in accordance with the prior 5-year trend. After multiple corrections, the presence of Covid-19 diagnosis resulted one of the independent predictors of all-cause mortality at 30 days [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 4.3; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 2.90-6.23; p < 0.0001] and 6 months (adjusted OR 3.5; 95% CI: 2.43-5.03; p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: During the 2020 national outbreak in Italy, a concomitant diagnosis of Covid-19 in NSTEMI was associated with a significantly higher rate of mortality., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aims: To evaluate the effect of an intercurrent non-coronary illness on the management and outcome of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)., Methods and Results: Consecutive hospitalized patients with a primary diagnosis of NSTEMI between August 2008 and December 2019 at Sheba Medical Center. All patients' records were reviewed for the presence of a non-coronary precipitating event (NCPE): a major intercurrent acute non-coronary illness or condition, either cardiac or non-cardiac. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Cox regression with interaction analysis was applied. Final study population comprised 6491 patients, of whom 2621 (40%) had NCPEs. Patients with NCPEs were older (77 vs. 69 years) and more likely to have comorbidities. The most prevalent event was infection (35%, n = 922). During a median follow-up of 30 months, 2529 patients died. Patients with NCPEs were 43% more likely to die during follow-up in a multivariable model (95% CI: 1.31-1.55). Invasive strategy was associated with a 55% lower mortality among patients without NCPE and only 44% among patients with NCPE (P for interaction < 0.001). Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was associated with a 20% lower mortality in patients without NCEP and a non-significant mortality difference among patients with NCPE (P for interaction = 0.014). Sub-analysis by the specific NCPE showed the highest mortality risk among patients with infectious precipitant. The lower mortality associated with invasive strategy was not observed in this subgroup., Conclusion: Among NSTEMI patients, the presence of an NCPE is associated with poor survival and modifies the effect of management strategies., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None declared., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims: The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) EURObservational Research Programme (EORP) Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) Registry aims to identify international patterns in NSTEMI management in clinical practice and outcomes against the 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without ST-segment-elevation., Methods and Results: Consecutively hospitalised adult NSTEMI patients (n = 3620) were enrolled between 11 March 2019 and 6 March 2021, and individual patient data prospectively collected at 287 centres in 59 participating countries during a two-week enrolment period per centre. The registry collected data relating to baseline characteristics, major outcomes (in-hospital death, acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, bleeding, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, and 30-day mortality) and guideline-recommended NSTEMI care interventions: electrocardiogram pre- or in-hospital, pre-hospitalization receipt of aspirin, echocardiography, coronary angiography, referral to cardiac rehabilitation, smoking cessation advice, dietary advice, and prescription on discharge of aspirin, P2Y12 inhibition, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), beta-blocker, and statin., Conclusion: The EORP NSTEMI Registry is an international, prospective registry of care and outcomes of patients treated for NSTEMI, which will provide unique insights into the contemporary management of hospitalised NSTEMI patients, compliance with ESC 2015 NSTEMI Guidelines, and identify potential barriers to optimal management of this common clinical presentation associated with significant morbidity and mortality., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Myocardial infarction is an important cause of cardiovascular mortality and can be precipitated by climatic factors. The temperature dependence of myocardial infarction risk has been well examined in temperate settings. Fewer studies have investigated this in the tropics where thermal amplitudes are narrower. This study investigated how ambient temperature influenced the risk of non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), an increasingly common type of myocardial infarction, in the tropical city-state of Singapore., Methods: All nationally reported NSTEMI cases from 2009 to 2018 were included and assessed for its short-term association with ambient temperature using conditional Poisson regression models that comprised a three-way interaction term with year, month and day of the week and adjusted for relative humidity. The Distributed Lag Non-Linear Modelling (DLNM) was used to account for the immediate and lagged effects of environmental exposures. Stratified analysis by sex and age groups was undertaken to assess potential effect modification., Results: There were 60,643 reports of NSTEMI. Temperature decline (cool effect) was associated with a delayed cumulative, non-linear increase in NSTEMI risk over 10 days post exposure [Relative Risk (RR lag0 - 10, 10th percentile : 1.12, 95%CI: 1.02-1.24)]. Those aged 65 years and above were potentially more susceptible (RR lag0 - 10, 10th percentile : 1.19, 95 % CI: 1.06-1.33) to the cool effect compared to those below that age (RR lag0 - 10, 10th percentile : 1.00, 95 % CI: 0.85-1.18) (p-value for difference = 0.087)., Conclusion: Short-term temperature fluctuations were independently associated with NSTEMI incidence in the tropics, with age as a potential effect modifier of this association. An increase in the frequency of climate change driven temperature events may trigger more instances of NSTEMI in tropical cosmopolitan cities., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2019, several countries have reported a substantial drop in the number of patients admitted with non-ST-segment myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)., Objective: We aimed to evaluate the changes in admissions, in-hospital management and outcomes of patients with NSTEMI in the COVID-19 era in a nationwide survey., Method: A prospective, multicenter, observational, nationwide study involving 13 medical centers across Israel aimed to evaluate consecutive patients with NSTEMI admitted to intensive cardiac care units over an 8-week period during the COVID-19 outbreak and to compare them with NSTEMI patients admitted at the same period 2 years earlier (control period)., Results: There were 624 (43%) NSTEMI patients, of whom 349 (56%) were hospitalized during the COVID-19 era and 275 (44%) during the control period. There were no significant differences in age, gender and other baseline characteristics between the two study periods. During the COVID-19 era, more patients arrived at the hospital via an emergency medical system compared with the control period (P = 0.05). Time from symptom onset to hospital admission was longer in the COVID-19 era as compared with the control period [11.5 h (interquartile range, IQR, 2.5-46.7) vs. 2.9 h (IQR 1.7-6.8), respectively, P < 0.001]. Nevertheless, the time from hospital admission to reperfusion was similar in both groups. The rate of coronary angiography was also similar in both groups. The in-hospital mortality rate was similar in both the COVID-19 era and the control period groups (2.3% vs. 4.7%, respectively, P = 0.149) as was the 30-day mortality rate (3.7% vs. 5.1%, respectively, P = 0.238)., Conclusion: In contrast to previous reports, admission rates of NSTEMI were similar in this nationwide survey during the COVID-19 era. With longer time from symptoms to admission, but with the same time from hospital admission to reperfusion therapy and with similar in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates. Even in times of crisis, adherence of medical systems to clinical practice guidelines ensures the preservation of good clinical outcomes., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

QRS duration (QRSd) is ill-defined and under-researched as a prognosticator in patients with non-ST-segment myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). We analyzed 240,866 adult (≥18 years) hospitalizations with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction using data from the United Kingdom Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project. Clinical characteristics and all-cause in-hospital mortality were analyzed according to QRSd, with 38,023 patients presenting with a QRSd >120 ms and 202,842 patients with a QRSd <120 ms. Patients with a QRSd >120 ms were more frequently older (median age of 79 years vs 71 years, p <0.001), and of white ethnicity (93% vs 91%, p <0.001). Patients with a QRSd <120 ms had higher frequency of use of aspirin (97% vs 95%, p <0.001), P2Y12 inhibitor (93% vs 89%, p <0.001), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (82% vs 81%, p <0.001) and β blockers (83% vs 78%, p <0.001). Invasive management strategies were more likely to be used in patients with QRSd <120 ms including invasive coronary angiography (72% vs 54%, p <0.001), percutaneous coronary intervention (46% vs 33%, p <0.001) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (8% vs 6%, p <0.001). In a propensity score matching analysis, there were no differences between the 2 groups in the adjusted rates of in-hospital all-cause mortality (odds ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.86 to 1.01) or major adverse cardiac events (odds ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 1.02) during the index admission. In conclusion, prolonged QRSd >120 ms in the context of non-ST-segment myocardial infarction is not associated with worse in-hospital mortality or the outcomes of major adverse cardiac events., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Little is known about the association between the type of admission ward and quality of care and outcomes for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)., Methods and Results: We analysed data from 337 155 NSTEMI admissions between 2010 and 2017 in the UK Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) database. The cohort was dichotomised according to receipt of care either on a medical (n = 142,876) or cardiac ward, inclusive of acute cardiac wards and cardiac care unit (n = 194,279) on admission to hospital. Patients admitted to a cardiac ward were younger (median age 70 y vs. 75 y, P &lt; 0.001), and less likely to be female (33% vs. 40%, P &lt; 0.001). Independent factors associated with admission to a cardiac ward included ischaemic ECG changes (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.18-1.23) and prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.16-1.22). Patients admitted to a cardiac ward were more likely to receive optimal pharmacotherapy with statin (85% vs. 81%, P &lt; 0.001) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (91% vs. 88%, P &lt; 0.001) on discharge, undergo invasive coronary angiography (78% vs. 59%, P &lt; 0.001), and receive revascularisation in the form of PCI (52% vs. 36%, P &lt; 0.001). Following multivariable logistic regression, the odds of inhospital all-cause mortality (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.70-0.81) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.78-0.91) were lower in patients admitted to a cardiac ward., Conclusion: Patients with NSTEMI admitted to a cardiac ward on admission were more likely to receive guideline directed management and had better clinical outcomes., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Objective: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the leading causes of death; however, updated data regarding clinical presentation and current management are missing in Greece. This study aimed to prospectively record the demographic and clinical characteristics of a representative sample of patients suffering from AMI, their management, and short-term outcomes., Methods: ILIAKTIS is a national, prospective, multicenter, noninterventional study conducted under the auspices of Hellenic Society of Cardiology (HCS) and the European Initiative Stent - Save a Life. From 1 st April 2020 to 30 th June 2020, consecutive adult patients with STEMI or NSTEMI were enrolled in the 50 participating hospitals, appropriately selected to match the geographical and population distribution in the Greek territory., Results: In total, 1862 patients (mean age: 64.2 ± 13.2 yrs.; 77.2% males) with AMI were enrolled. More patients presented with NSTEMI (56.8%) than with STEMI (43.2%). Primary PCI (pPCI) was the preferable treatment option for STEMI patients in PCI-hospitals (76.9% vs. 39.9% for non-PCI, p < .001) and thrombolysis in non-PCI-hospitals (47.3% vs. 17.9% for PCI-hospitals, p < .001). The mean length of hospital stay was 5.6 days. In-hospital mortality was less likely in NSTEMI compared to that in STEMI patients (aOR = 0.30; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.49). Patients initially admitted in non-PCI-hospitals showed increased risk for in-hospital (aOR = 2.29; 95% CI 1.20 to 4.42) and 30-day mortality (aOR = 1.88; 95% CI 1.20 to 2.96)., Conclusion: This study shows that the proportion of STEMI and NSTEMI patients managed interventionally has significantly increased, resulting in better clinical outcomes compared to previous Greek surveys., (Copyright © 2022 Hellenic Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Little is known about the association between admitting physician specialty and care quality and outcomes for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)., Methods and Results: We identified 288 420 patients hospitalized with NSTEMI between 2010 and 2017 in the UK Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project database. The cohort was dichotomized according to care under a non-cardiologist (n = 146 722) and care under a cardiologist (n = 141 698) within the first 24 h of admission to hospital. Patients admitted under a cardiologist were significantly younger (70 vs. 75 years, P < 0.001), and less likely to be female (32% vs. 39%, P < 0.001). Independent factors associated with admission under a cardiologist included prior history of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [odds ratio (OR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.07; P = 0.04], hypercholesterolaemia (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.15-1.20; P < 0.001), hypertension (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.04; P = 0.01), and admission to an interventional centre (OR 3.90, 95% CI 3.79-4.00; P < 0.001). Patients admitted under cardiology were more likely to receive optimal pharmacotherapy, undergo invasive coronary angiography (79% vs. 60%, P < 0.001), and receive revascularization in the form of PCI (52% vs. 36%, P < 0.001). Following propensity score matching, odds of in-hospital all-cause mortality (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.79-0.85; P < 0.001), re-infarction (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66-0.91; P = 0.001), and major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.78-0.84; P < 0.001) were lower in patients admitted under a cardiologist., Conclusion: Patients with NSTEMI admitted under a cardiologist within 24 h of hospital admission were more likely to receive guideline-directed management and had better clinical outcomes., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)